Effect of passive eye movement on retinogeniculate transmission in the cat

Joint coding of visual input and eye/head position in V1 of freely moving mice

Visual input during natural behavior is highly dependent on movements of the eyes and head, but how information about eye and head position is integrated with visual processing during free movement is unknown, as visual physiology is generally performed under head fixation. To address this, we performed single-unit electrophysiology in V1 of freely moving mice while simultaneously measuring the mouse's eye position, head orientation, and the visual scene from the mouse's perspective. From these measures, we mapped spatiotemporal receptive fields during free movement based on the gaze-corrected visual input. Furthermore, we found a significant fraction of neurons tuned for eye and head position, and these signals were integrated with visual responses through a multiplicative mechanism in the majority of modulated neurons. These results provide new insight into coding in the mouse V1 and, more generally, provide a paradigm for investigating visual physiology under natural conditions, including active sensing and ethological behavior.

Beyond the labeled line: variation in visual reference frames from intraparietal cortex to frontal eye fields and the superior colliculus

We accurately perceive the visual scene despite moving our eyes ~3 times per second, an ability that requires incorporation of eye position and retinal information. In this study, we assessed how this neural computation unfolds across three interconnected structures: frontal eye fields (FEF), intraparietal cortex (LIP/MIP), and the superior colliculus (SC). Single-unit activity was assessed in head-restrained monkeys performing visually guided saccades from different initial fixations. As previously shown, the receptive fields of most LIP/MIP neurons shifted to novel positions on the retina for each eye position, and these locations were not clearly related to each other in either eye- or head-centered coordinates (defined as hybrid coordinates). In contrast, the receptive fields of most SC neurons were stable in eye-centered coordinates. In FEF, visual signals were intermediate between those patterns: around 60% were eye-centered, whereas the remainder showed changes in receptive field location, boundaries, or responsiveness that rendered the response patterns hybrid or occasionally head-centered. These results suggest that FEF may act as a transitional step in an evolution of coordinates between LIP/MIP and SC. The persistence across cortical areas of mixed representations that do not provide unequivocal location labels in a consistent reference frame has implications for how these representations must be read out. NEW & NOTEWORTHY How we perceive the world as stable using mobile retinas is poorly understood. We compared the stability of visual receptive fields across different fixation positions in three visuomotor regions. Irregular changes in receptive field position were ubiquitous in intraparietal cortex, evident but less common in the frontal eye fields, and negligible in the superior colliculus (SC), where receptive fields shifted reliably across fixations. Only the SC provides a stable labeled-line code for stimuli across saccades.

The multifunctional lateral geniculate nucleus

Providing the critical link between the retina and visual cortex, the well-studied lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) has stood out as a structure in search of a function exceeding the mundane 'relay'. For many mammals, it is structurally impressive: Exquisite lamination, sophisticated microcircuits, and blending of multiple inputs suggest some fundamental transform. This impression is bolstered by the fact that numerically, the retina accounts for a small fraction of its input. Despite such promise, the extent to which an LGN neuron separates itself from its retinal brethren has proven difficult to appreciate. Here, I argue that whereas retinogeniculate coupling is strong, what occurs in the LGN is judicious pruning of a retinal drive by nonretinal inputs. These nonretinal inputs reshape a receptive field that under the right conditions departs significantly from its retinal drive, even if transiently. I first review design features of the LGN and follow with evidence for 10 putative functions. Only two of these tend to surface in textbooks: parsing retinal axons by eye and functional group and gating by state. Among the remaining putative functions, implementation of the principle of graceful degradation and temporal decorrelation are at least as interesting but much less promoted. The retina solves formidable problems imposed by physics to yield multiple efficient and sensitive representations of the world. The LGN applies context, increasing content, and gates several of these representations. Even if the basic concentric receptive field remains, information transmitted for each LGN spike relative to each retinal spike is measurably increased.

On the impact of attention and motor planning on the lateral geniculate nucleus

Although the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) is one of the most thoroughly characterized thalamic nuclei, its functional role remains controversial. Traditionally, the LGN in primates has been viewed as the lowest level of a set of feedforward parallel visual pathways to cortex. These feedforward pathways are pictured as connected hierarchies of areas designed to construct the visual image gradually - adding more complex features as one marches through successive levels of the hierarchy. In terms of synapse number and circuitry, the anatomy suggests that the LGN can be viewed also as the ultimate terminus in a series of feedback pathways that originate at the highest cortical levels. Since the visual system is dynamic, a more accurate picture of image construction might be one in which information flows bidirectionally, through both the feedforward and feedback pathways constantly and simultaneously. Based upon evidence from anatomy, physiology, and imaging, we argue that the LGN is more than a simple gate for retinal information. Here, we review evidence that suggests that one function of the LGN is to enhance relevant visual signals through circuits related to both motor planning and attention. Specifically, we argue that major extraretinal inputs to the LGN may provide: (1) eye movement information to enhance and bind visual signals related to new saccade targets and (2) top-down and bottom-up information about target relevance to selectively enhance visual signals through spatial attention.

Motor-related signals in the intraparietal cortex encode locations in a hybrid, rather than eye-centered reference frame

The reference frame used by intraparietal cortex neurons to encode locations is controversial. Many previous studies have suggested eye-centered coding, whereas we have reported that visual and auditory signals employ a hybrid reference frame (i.e., a combination of head- and eye-centered information) (Mullette-Gillman et al. 2005). One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that sensory-related activity, which we studied previously, is hybrid, whereas motor-related activity might be eye centered. Here, we examined the reference frame of visual and auditory saccade-related activity in the lateral and medial banks of the intraparietal sulcus (areas lateral intraparietal area [LIP] and medial intraparietal area [MIP]) of 2 rhesus monkeys. We recorded from 275 single neurons as monkeys performed visual and auditory saccades from different initial eye positions. We found that both visual and auditory signals reflected a hybrid of head- and eye-centered coordinates during both target and perisaccadic task periods rather than shifting to an eye-centered format as the saccade approached. This account differs from numerous previous recording studies. We suggest that the geometry of the receptive field sampling in prior studies was biased in favor of an eye-centered reference frame. Consequently, the overall hybrid nature of the reference frame was overlooked because the non-eye-centered response patterns were not fully characterized.

Representation of eye position in primate inferior colliculus

We studied the representation of eye-position information in the primate inferior colliculus (IC). Monkeys fixated visual stimuli at one of eight or nine locations along the horizontal meridian between -24 and 24 degrees while sounds were presented from loudspeakers at locations within that same range. Approximately 40% of our sample of 153 neurons showed statistically significant sensitivity to eye position during either the presentation of an auditory stimulus or in the absence of sound (Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05). The representation for eye position was predominantly monotonic and favored contralateral eye positions. Eye-position sensitivity was more prevalent among neurons without sound-location sensitivity: about half of neurons that were insensitive to sound location were sensitive to eye position, whereas only about one-quarter of sound-location-sensitive neurons were also sensitive to eye position. Our findings suggest that sound location and eye position are encoded using independent but overlapping rate codes at the level of the IC. The use of a common format has computational advantages for integrating these two signals. The differential distribution of eye-position sensitivity and sound-location sensitivity suggests that this process has begun by the level of the IC but is not yet complete at this stage. We discuss how these signals might fit into Groh and Sparks' vector subtraction model for coordinate transformations.

Eye-centered, head-centered, and complex coding of visual and auditory targets in the intraparietal sulcus

The integration of visual and auditory events is thought to require a joint representation of visual and auditory space in a common reference frame. We investigated the coding of visual and auditory space in the lateral and medial intraparietal areas (LIP, MIP) as a candidate for such a representation. We recorded the activity of 275 neurons in LIP and MIP of two monkeys while they performed saccades to a row of visual and auditory targets from three different eye positions. We found 45% of these neurons to be modulated by the locations of visual targets, 19% by auditory targets, and 9% by both visual and auditory targets. The reference frame for both visual and auditory receptive fields ranged along a continuum between eye- and head-centered reference frames with approximately 10% of auditory and 33% of visual neurons having receptive fields that were more consistent with an eye- than a head-centered frame of reference and 23 and 18% having receptive fields that were more consistent with a head- than an eye-centered frame of reference, leaving a large fraction of both visual and auditory response patterns inconsistent with both head- and eye-centered reference frames. The results were similar to the reference frame we have previously found for auditory stimuli in the inferior colliculus and core auditory cortex. The correspondence between the visual and auditory receptive fields of individual neurons was weak. Nevertheless, the visual and auditory responses were sufficiently well correlated that a simple one-layer network constructed to calculate target location from the activity of the neurons in our sample performed successfully for auditory targets even though the weights were fit based only on the visual responses. We interpret these results as suggesting that although the representations of space in areas LIP and MIP are not easily described within the conventional conceptual framework of reference frames, they nevertheless process visual and auditory spatial information in a similar fashion.

Surfing a spike wave down the ventral stream

Numerous theories of neural processing, often motivated by experimental observations, have explored the computational properties of neural codes based on the absolute or relative timing of spikes in spike trains. Spiking neuron models and theories however, as well as their experimental counterparts, have generally been limited to the simulation or observation of isolated neurons, isolated spike trains, or reduced neural populations. Such theories would therefore seem inappropriate to capture the properties of a neural code relying on temporal spike patterns distributed across large neuronal populations. Here we report a range of computer simulations and theoretical considerations that were designed to explore the possibilities of one such code and its relevance for visual processing. In a unified framework where the relation between stimulus saliency and spike relative timing plays the central role, we describe how the ventral stream of the visual system could process natural input scenes and extract meaningful information, both rapidly and reliably. The first wave of spikes generated in the retina in response to a visual stimulation carries information explicitly in its spatio-temporal structure: the most salient information is represented by the first spikes over the population. This spike wave, propagating through a hierarchy of visual areas, is regenerated at each processing stage, where its temporal structure can be modified by (i). the selectivity of the cortical neurons, (ii). lateral interactions and (iii). top-down attentional influences from higher order cortical areas. The resulting model could account for the remarkable efficiency and rapidity of processing observed in the primate visual system.

The functions of the proprioceptors of the eye muscles

This article sets out to present a fairly comprehensive review of our knowledge about the functions of the receptors that have been found in the extraocular muscles--the six muscles that move each eye of vertebrates in its orbit--of all the animals in which they have been sought, including Man. Since their discovery at the beginning of the 20th century these receptors have, at various times, been credited with important roles in the control of eye movement and the construction of extrapersonal space and have also been denied any function whatsoever. Experiments intended to study the actions of eye muscle receptors and, even more so, opinions (and indeed polemic) derived from these observations have been influenced by the changing fashions and beliefs about the more general question of how limb position and movement is detected by the brain and which signals contribute to those aspects of this that are perceived (kinaesthesis). But the conclusions drawn from studies on the eye have also influenced beliefs about the mechanisms of kinaesthesis and, arguably, this influence has been even larger than that in the converse direction. Experimental evidence accumulated over rather more than a century is set out and discussed. It supports the view that, at the beginning of the 21st century, there are excellent grounds for believing that the receptors in the extraocular muscles are indeed proprioceptors, that is to say that the signals that they send into the brain are used to provide information about the position and movement of the eye in the orbit. It seems that this information is important in the control of eye movements of at least some types, and in the determination by the brain of the direction of gaze and the relationship of the organism to its environment. In addition, signals from these receptors in the eye muscles are seen to be necessary for the development of normal mechanisms of visual analysis in the mammalian visual cortex and for both the development and maintenance of normal visuomotor behaviour. Man is among those vertebrates to whose brains eye muscle proprioceptive signals provide information apparently used in normal sensorimotor functions; these include various aspects of perception, and of the control of eye movement. It is possible that abnormalities of the eye muscle proprioceptors and their signals may play a part in the genesis of some types of human squint (strabismus); conversely studies of patients with squint in the course of their surgical or pharmacological treatment have yielded much interesting evidence about the central actions of the proprioceptive signals from the extraocular muscles. The results of experiments on the eye have played a large part in the historical controversy, now in at least its third century, about the origin of signals that inform the brain about movement of parts of the body. Some of these results, and more of the interpretations of them, now need to be critically re-examined. The re-examination in the light of recent experiments that is presented here does not support many of the conclusions confidently drawn in the past and leads to both new insights and fresh questions about the roles of information from motor signals flowing out of the brain and that from signals from the peripheral receptors flowing into it. There remain many lacunae in our knowledge and filling some of these will, it is contended, be essential to advance our understanding further. It is argued that such understanding of eye muscle proprioception is a necessary part of the understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of eye movement control and that it is also essential to an account of how organisms, including Man, build and maintain knowledge of their relationship to the external visual world. The eye would seem to provide a uniquely favourable system in which to study the way in which information derived within the brain about motor actions may interact with signals flowing in from peripheral receptors. The review is constructed in relatively independent sections that deal with particular topics. It ends with a fairly brief piece in which the author sets out some personal views about what has been achieved recently and what most immediately needs to be done. It also suggests some lines of study that appear to the author to be important for the future.

The anatomical organization of the macaque pregeniculate complex

Saccade-related activity recorded in the primate pregeniculate nucleus, and its anatomical connections with the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) and superior colliculus (SC), suggest that it plays a role in visual-ocular motor integration. To study this role, a clearer understanding of pregeniculate organization is required. Based on its connectivity and neurotransmitter immunocytochemistry, we demonstrate that this nucleus is composed of several subnuclei, suggesting the term, pregeniculate complex (PrGC). The PrGC includes a weakly developed dorsal lamina, rostrally, and a well-developed ventral lamina. The ventral lamina includes the retinorecipient and superior sublayers, rostrally, and the medial division, caudally. A thin lamina of cells lateral to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus is contiguous with the PrGC; we term this the lateral division. The PrGC and the lateral division each project to the SC/NOT; the superior sublayer and medial division of the PrGC are connected reciprocally to the SC/NOT. Immunocytochemistry for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and substance P (SP) further delineate the PrGC subnuclei. The retinorecipient sublayer stains most intensely for GABA and SP. The superior sublayer and medial division also stain strongly for GABA and SP. Essentially all neurons in the lateral division are GABA-positive. The combination of tract tracing and immunocytochemistry demonstrate differences in the connectivity of the PrGC subnuclei and the lateral division with the SC/NOT. This, combined with the differential localization of GABA in the PrGC, provides a basis for further study of its functional role.

Afferent signals from the extraocular muscles affect the gain of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in the alert pigeon

We have shown previously that the gain of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (HVOR) is modified by afferent signals from extraocular muscle proprioceptors in the decerebrate pigeon. We have now analysed the variability of the HVOR in intact, alert pigeons and, using the artificial vestibulo-ocular reflex method, have found that in all of the pigeons tested afferent signals from the extraocular muscle proprioceptors modify the gain, but not the phase, of the HVOR. While this effect was seen in a given bird only on some occasions, when present it was consistent in magnitude and direction and closely similar to our previous observations on decerebrate pigeons. These results from alert, intact birds strengthen the evidence that extraocular muscle afferent signals play a part in the control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Proprioceptive and retinal afference modify postsaccadic ocular drift

Drift of the eyes after saccades produces motion of images on the retina (retinal slip) that degrades visual acuity. In this study, we examined the contributions of proprioceptive and retinal afference to the suppression of postsaccadic drift induced by a unilateral ocular muscle paresis. Eye movements were recorded in three rhesus monkeys with a unilateral weakness of one vertical extraocular muscle before and after proprioceptive deafferentation of the paretic eye. Postsaccadic drift was examined in four visual states: monocular viewing with the normal eye (4-wk period); binocular viewing (2-wk period); binocular viewing with a disparity-reducing prism (2-wk period); and monocular viewing with the paretic eye (2-wk period). The muscle paresis produced vertical postsaccadic drift in the paretic eye, and this drift was suppressed in the binocular viewing condition even when the animals could not fuse. When the animals viewed binocularly with a disparity-reducing prism, the drift in the paretic eye was suppressed in two monkeys (with superior oblique pareses) but generally was enhanced in one animal (with a tenotomy of the inferior rectus). When drift movements were enhanced, they reduced the retinal disparity that was present at the end of the saccade. In the paretic-eye-viewing condition, postsaccadic drift was suppressed in the paretic eye and was induced in the normal eye. After deafferentation in the normal-eye-viewing state, there was a change in the vertical postsaccadic drift of the paretic eye. This change in drift was idiosyncratic and variably affected the amplitude and velocity of the postsaccadic drift movements of the paretic eye. Deafferentation of the paretic eye did not affect the postsaccadic drift of the normal eye nor did it impair visually mediated adaptation of postsaccadic drift. The results demonstrate several new findings concerning the roles of visual and proprioceptive afference in the control of postsaccadic drift: disconjugate adaptation of postsaccadic drift does not require binocular fusion; slow, postsaccadic drift movements that reduce retinal disparity but concurrently increase retinal slip can be induced in the binocular viewing state; postsaccadic drift is modified by proprioception from the extraocular muscles, but these modifications do not serve to minimize retinal slip or to correct errors in saccade amplitude; and visually mediated adaptation of postsaccadic drift does not require proprioceptive afference from the paretic eye.

Extraocular muscle proprioceptors and proprioception

Uncertainty of the roles of proprioception and efference copy in visual spatial perception persists. Proprioception has won back some support recently mainly on the evidence gained from physiological experiments in man, and rather than being mutually exclusive, the two mechanisms have been presented as collaborating. Another view supported by human and animal experiments states that current visual spatial perception may be served by efference copy whereas proprioception is responsible for temporal adaptations of the system. Certain characteristics of visuomotor cells of the monkey cortex can be explained assuming an efference copy input. Anatomical data from different sources are not easily reconciled. Disagreement about the nerve pathway of muscle afferents weakens arguments based on the results of open loop experiments involving nerve lesions in monkeys. The assumed presence of Golgi tendon organs in human extraocular muscles is no longer tenable and instead, palisade endings similar to those of cats and monkeys and other, irregular nerve endings are described. But man differs in having a limited and patchy distribution of neurotendonous endings and moreover, they may develop only after infancy. The allocation of a sensory function to palisade endings in myotendinous cylinders appears secure, at least in cats. Detailed examination of muscle spindles in man reveals anomalies of structure sufficient to question their capacity to provide useful proprioceptive information. One of the anomalies is the atrophy of intrafusal muscle fibres, present in both infant and adult muscles, and it is proposed that the redundant sensory endings, which do not appear to degenerate, search for new targets and may account for the random presence of tendon nerve endings. These observations place the role of proprioception in human extraocular muscles in jeopardy; they are unsupportive of the recent physiological studies and favour efference copy.

Signals of eye position and velocity in the first-order afferents from pigeon extraocular muscles

Responses of first-order afferents from the extraocular muscles of the pigeon were studied by extracellular recording in the ophthalmic part of the trigeminal ganglion of decerebrate, paralysed pigeons. The afferents responded to both the amplitude and velocity of ramp displacements of the intact eye with amplitude sensitivities ranging from 0.9 to 8 impulses/s/deg of eye displacement beyond the response threshold. Once a new stable position had been reached, the afferent signal depended only upon the absolute position of the eye within the orbit. The responses adapted in seconds rather than minutes so these units would not provide a continuous signal of the position of an immobile eye; they are best described as signalling position and velocity in relation to eye movements.

Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision

The progressive frontalization of both eyes in mammals causes overlap of the left and right visual fields, having as a consequence a region of binocular field with single vision and stereopsis. The horizontal separation of the eyes makes the retinal images of the objects lying in this binocular field have slight horizontal and vertical differences, termed disparities. Horizontal disparities are the main cue for stereopsis. In the past decades numerous physiological studies made on monkeys, which have in many aspects a similar visual system to humans, showed that a population of visual cells are capable of encoding the amplitude and sign of horizontal disparity. Such disparity detectors were found in cortical visual areas V1, V2, V3, V3A, VP, MT (V5) and MST of monkeys and in the superior colliculus of the cat and opossum. According to their disparity tuning function, these cells were first grouped into tuned excitatory, tuned inhibitory, near and far sub-groups. Subsequent studies added two more categories, tuned near and tuned far cells. Asymmetries between left and right receptive field position, on and off regions, and intra-receptive field wiring are believed to be the neural mechanisms of disparity detection. Because horizontal disparity alone is insufficient to compute reliable stereopsis, additional information about fixation distance and angle of gaze is required. Thus, while there is unequivocal evidence of cells capable of detecting horizontal disparities, it is not known how horizontal disparity is calibrated. Sensitivity to vertical disparity and information about the vergence angle or eye position may be the source of this additional information.

Effects of saccades on the activity of neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

Effects of saccades on individual neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were examined under two conditions: during spontaneous saccades in the dark and during stimulation by large, uniform flashes delivered at various times during and after rewarded saccades made to small visual targets. In the dark condition, a suppression of activity began 200-300 ms before saccade start, peaked approximately 100 ms before saccade start, and smoothly reversed to a facilitation of activity by saccade end. The facilitation peaked 70-130 ms after saccade end and decayed during the next several hundred milliseconds. The latency of the facilitation was related inversely to saccade velocity, reaching a minimum for saccades with peak velocity >70-80 degrees /s. Effects of saccades on visually evoked activity were remarkably similar: a facilitation began at saccade end and peaked 50-100 ms later. When matched for saccade velocity, the time courses and magnitudes of postsaccadic facilitation for activity in the dark and during visual stimulation were identical. The presaccadic suppression observed in the dark condition was similar for X and Y cells, whereas the postsaccadic facilitation was substantially stronger for X cells, both in the dark and for visually evoked responses. This saccade-related regulation of geniculate transmission appears to be independent of the conditions under which the saccade is evoked or the state of retinal input to the LGN. The change in activity from presaccadic suppression to postsaccadic facilitation amounted to an increase in gain of geniculate transmission of approximately 30%. This may promote rapid central registration of visual inputs by increasing the temporal contrast between activity evoked by an image near the end of a fixation and that evoked by the image immediately after a saccade.

The distribution and morphology of LGN K pathway axons within the layers and CO blobs of owl monkey V1

The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of primates contains three classes of relay cells, the magnocellular (M), parvocellular (P), and koniocellular (K) cells. At present, very little is known about either the structure or function of the K relay cells in New or Old World monkeys (simian primates). In monkeys, K cells are located between the main LGN layers and adjacent to the optic tract. For convenience, these intercalated cell layers are numbered K1-K4 starting closest to the optic tract with K1. The objective of this study was to examine the details of K axon morphology in the primary visual cortex (V1) of owl monkeys and to determine if different K layers give rise to distinct axon types. For this purpose, injections of WGA-HRP or PHA-L were made into specific K LGN layers and the distribution and morphology of the resulting labeled axons were analyzed. Injections of fluorescent tracers also were made within the superficial layers of V1 to further document connections via analysis of the patterns of retrogradely labeled cells in the LGN. Our main finding is that K axons in owl monkeys terminate as delicate focused arbors within single cytochrome oxidase (CO) blob columns in cortical layer III and within cortical layer I. Overall, the morphology of the K axons in these monkeys is quite similar to what we described previously for K geniculocortical axons in the distantly related bush baby (prosimian primate), suggesting that the basic features of this pathway are common to all primates. Our results also provide evidence that the axon arbors from different K layers are morphologically distinct; axons from LGN layer K1 project mainly to cortical layer I, while axons from LGN layer K3 chiefly terminate in cortical layer III. Taken together, these results imply that the basic features of axons within the K pathway are conserved across primates, and that the K axons from different K layers are likely to differ in function based upon their different morphologies.

Eye position effects in monkey cortex. II. Pursuit- and fixation-related activity in posterior parietal areas LIP and 7A

We studied the effect of eye position on pursuit-related discharges and activity during fixation in darkness for neurons of monkey visual cortical areas (lateral intraparietal area) LIP and 7A. In a first step, neurons were tested for direction-specific activity related to pursuit eye movements while the monkey tracked a moving target. In consecutive trials the pursuit target moved in random order in one of four directions on a translucent screen. For 39% of the neurons, located mostly in a dorsoposterior region of area LIP, as well as 42% of the neurons tested in area 7A, a direction-specific pursuit-related activity could be found. To test whether responsiveness of these neurons was modulated by eye position, we employed a pursuit paradigm. In this paradigm, the monkey had to track a target that started to move in the preferred direction with constant speed from five different locations on the screen in random order. For the majority of cells in both areas, pursuit-related activity was modulated by eye position. Most of the neurons tested also revealed an influence of eye position on their spontaneous activity during fixation in darkness (fixation paradigm). For the majority of cells (> 50%) recorded in both areas, two-dimensional regression planes could be approximated significantly (P < 0.05) or nearly significantly (P < 0.1) to the neuronal discharges observed on the fixation paradigm and pursuit paradigm. For 79% of the LIP neurons and 83% of the 7A neurons tested in both experimental paradigms, the directions of the gradients of the regression planes pointed into the same hemifield, suggesting a common neuronal mechanism mediating the eye position effect regardless of the behavioral task the monkey was performing. The observed effects very much resemble the effects of eye position on light-sensitive and saccade-related responses already described for areas LIP and 7A. Regarding also our results observed for the middle temporal and medial superior temporal areas, it is suggested that the observed modulatory effect of eye position on neuronal activity is a common phenomenon in the macaque visual cortical system subserving an internal representation of the external space in a nonretinocentric frame of reference.

The primary afferent pathway of extraocular muscle proprioception in the pigeon

Recent physiological experiments in our laboratory suggest that extraocular muscle proprioceptive signals are involved in oculomotor control in the pigeon [e.g., Knox and Donaldson (1993) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253, 77-82]; the present results provide information about the primary afferent pathway involved in these actions. In other physiological experiments [Hayman et al. (1993) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 254, 115-122] we have shown that extraocular muscle afferent signals modify vestibularly driven neck reflexes in the pigeon; the present results suggest an anatomical substrate for these effects. The localization of the cell bodies and of the central terminations of afferent fibres from the extraocular muscles of the pigeon was examined using transport of horseradish peroxidase. The results showed that primary afferent cell somata subserving extraocular muscle proprioception are located within the ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion. The presence of heavily labelled brainstem neurons reported in a previous study [Eden et al. (1982) Brain Res. 237, 15-21] was confirmed; however, these cells were shown to be accessory abducens motoneurons innervating the quadratus muscle, and presumably the pyramidalis muscle also, and not proprioceptive afferent somata as had been suggested. The central projections of extraocular muscle afferent neurons were found consistently in a restricted area of the external cuneate nucleus. This is in contrast to findings in a number of mammals in which the terminal label has been seen to cluster in portions of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. The presence of a lateral trigeminal tract in the pigeon, through which the afferent axons course, which terminates exclusively in the ventral portion of the external cuneate nucleus may explain this finding.

Influence of the superior colliculus on responses of lateral geniculate neurons in the cat

The superior colliculus (SC) projects to all layers of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and thus is in a position to influence information transmission through the LGN. We investigated the function of the tecto-geniculate pathway by studying the responses of cat LGN neurons before, during, and after inactivating the SC with microinjections of lidocaine. The LGN cells were stimulated with drifting sine-wave gratings that varied in spatial frequency and contrast. Among 71 LGN neurons that were studied, 53 showed a statistically significant change in response during SC inactivation. Control experiments with mock injections indicated that some changes could be attributed to slow waxing and waning of responsiveness over time. However, this could not account for all of the effects of SC inactivation that were observed. Forty cells showed changes that were attributed to the removal of tecto-geniculate influences. About equal numbers of cells showed increases (22 cells) and decreases (18 cells) in some aspect of their response to visual stimuli during SC inactivation. The proportion of cells that showed tecto-geniculate influences was somewhat higher in the C layers (68% of the cells) than in the A layers (44% of the cells). In addition, among cells that showed a significant change in maximal response to visual stimulation, the change was larger for cells in the C layers (64% average change) than in the A layers (26% average change) and it was larger for W cells (61% average change) than for X and Y cells (29% average change). Nearly all of the X cells that showed changes had an increase in response, and nearly all of the Y cells had a decrease in response. In addition, across all cell classes, 80% of the cells with receptive fields < 15 deg from the area centralis had an increase in response, and 80% of the cells with receptive fields > or = 15 deg from the area centralis had a decrease in response. None of the LGN cells had significant changes in spatial resolution, and only three cells had changes in optimal spatial frequency. Ten cells had a change in contrast threshold, 25 cells had a change in contrast gain, and 29 cells had a change in the maximal response to a high-contrast stimulus. Thus, our results suggest that the tecto-geniculate pathway has little or no effect on spatial processing by LGN neurons. Rather, the major influence is on maximal response levels and the relationship between response and stimulus contrast.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Eye proprioception and visual localization in humans: influence of ocular dominance and visual context

It has been previously established that the application of low amplitude mechanical vibrations to the inferior rectus muscle of human subjects results in an illusory upward movement of a luminous spot fixated in total darkness, and in a corresponding overshooting of the target when the subject is asked to point to this spot. In the first experiment described here, we compared the effects of applying vibrations to each eye separately and to both eyes simultaneously, under monocular and binocular viewing conditions, in left- and right-eyed subjects. The results confirmed that proprioceptive signals arising from both eyes are involved in egocentric visual localization. A proprioceptive dominance was observed however since vibration of the dominant eye gave rise to larger pointing displacements. In addition, whichever eye was stimulated, the pointing shift induced by vibrating a covered eye was of smaller amplitude than that which occurred when vibrations were applied to the viewing eye. The second experiment showed that both the vibration induced illusions and the pointing shifts disappeared in a structured visual context, which suggests that the processes involved when the target is viewed in darkness might differ from those occurring in structured surroundings.

Dendritic development in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of ferrets in the postnatal absence of retinal input: a Golgi study

In order to determine the ongoing role of retinal fibers in the development of dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) neurons during postnatal development, the development of dLGN neurons in the postnatal absence of retinal input was studied in pigmented ferrets using the Golgi-Hortega technique. The development of four dLGN cell classes, defined on the basis of somatic and dendritic morphology, was described previously in normal ferrets (Sutton and Brunso-Bechtold, 1991, J. Comp. Neurol. 309:71-85). The present results indicate that the morphological development of dLGN neurons is strikingly similar in normal and experimental ferrets. The exuberant dendritic appendages that appear after eye opening in normal ferrets are overproduced and eliminated in the postnatal absence of retinal input; however, the final reduction of these transient appendages is delayed. Because exuberant appendages develop in the absence of retinal input, their production cannot depend upon visual experience. Differences in cell body size between normal and experimental ferrets are apparent only after neurons can be classified at the end of the first postnatal month. Cell body size is markedly reduced for class 1 neurons; class 2 cells also are reduced in size but to a far lesser extent. As there is a general trend for class 1 neurons to have the functional properties of Y-cells, it is likely that the dLGN neurons most affected by the absence of retinal input also are Y-cells.

The anatomical substrate for cat extraocular muscle proprioception

The localization of cell bodies and of the central terminal projections of extraocular muscle afferent neurons was examined in adult cats using transport of horseradish peroxidase. The results confirm that primary afferent cell somata subserving extraocular muscle proprioception are located within the medial portion of the ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion. Occasional labeling of cell bodies in the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve occurred only in association with evidence of spread of tracer beyond the eye muscles. These results, taken together with work of others, make it unlikely that the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus participates significantly in eye muscle proprioception. The central projections of extraocular muscle afferent neurons were found consistently in a restricted area in the ventral portion of the pars interpolaris of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. This corresponds exactly with their site of termination in the monkey [Porter (1986) J. comp. Neurol. 247, 133-143]. Terminal labeling was restricted to this area in cases in which there was no evidence of spread of the tracer beyond the extraocular muscles. In contrast to previous findings in the monkey, the cat did not exhibit a second muscle afferent representation in the cuneate nucleus. Though it is known that extraocular muscle afferent signals interact with both retinal and vestibular signals, and thus probably are involved in both visual processing and oculomotor control, the details of their roles in these processes are not yet clear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)