Asthma worsenings: approaches to prevention and management from the Asthma Worsenings Working Group

Health outcomes after stopping long-term mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: COMET

Asthma worsening and symptom control are clinically important health outcomes in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. This analysis of COMET evaluated whether stopping versus continuing long-term mepolizumab therapy impacted these outcomes.

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with ≥3 years continuous mepolizumab treatment (via COLUMBA (NCT01691859) or COSMEX (NCT02135692) open-label studies) were eligible to enter COMET (NCT02555371), a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomised 1:1 to continue mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks or to stop mepolizumab, plus standard of care asthma treatment. Patients could switch to open-label mepolizumab following an exacerbation. Health outcome endpoints included time to first asthma worsening (composite endpoint: rescue use, symptoms, awakening at night and morning peak expiratory flow (PEF)), patient and clinician assessed global rating of asthma severity and overall perception of response to therapy, and unscheduled healthcare resource utilisation.

Patients who stopped mepolizumab showed increased risk of and shorter time to first asthma worsening compared with those who continued mepolizumab (hazard ratio (HR) 1.71; 95% CI 1.17–2.52; p=0.006), including reduced asthma control (increased risk of first worsening in rescue use (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.00–1.84; p=0.047) and morning PEF (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.21–2.59; p=0.003). There was a higher probability of any unscheduled healthcare resource use (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.31–2.49; p<0.001), and patients and clinicians reported greater asthma severity and less favourable perceived response to therapy for patients who stopped versus continued mepolizumab.

These data suggest that patients with severe eosinophilic asthma continuing long-term mepolizumab treatment sustain clinically important improvements in health outcomes.

The COMET study investigated whether stopping long-term mepolizumab had an impact on health outcomes in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma; data suggest those who continue long-term mepolizumab treatment sustain clinically important improvementshttps://bit.ly/3A0bvwu

Development and validation of a prediction index for recent mortality in advanced COPD patients

The primary barrier to initiating palliative care for advanced COPD patients is the unpredictable course of the disease. We enroll 752 COPD patients into the study and validate the prediction tools for 1-year mortality using the current guidelines for palliative care. We also develop a composite prediction index for 1-year mortality and validate it in another cohort of 342 patients. Using the current prognostic models for recent mortality in palliative care, the best area under the curve (AUC) for predicting mortality is 0.68. Using the Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score and oxygen saturation to define the combined dyspnea and oxygenation (DO) index, we find that the AUC of the DO index is 0.84 for predicting mortality in the validated cohort. Predictions of 1-year mortality based on the current palliative care guideline for COPD patients are poor. The DO index exhibits better predictive ability than other models in the study.

Impact of influenza infection on the short- and long-term health of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Influenza is a common cause of acute respiratory infection that leads to exacerbation of underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To elucidate the short- and long-term effects of influenza in patients with COPD, we examined health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs up to 13 months following influenza infection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using U.S. insurance claims data from MarketScan. Patients with an influenza diagnosis during the 2012-2014 influenza seasons and continuous enrollment in a health plan from 12 months before to 13 months after the index influenza diagnosis were identified and propensity score-matched 1:5 to controls without evidence of influenza. COPD- and pneumonia-related outcomes were assessed over 13 months following influenza diagnosis.

RESULTS

COPD-associated outcomes after diagnosis were significantly worse in patients with influenza (n = 7,087) vs. controls (n = 35,435) during the first month (exacerbation: 16.1 vs. 3.4%; outpatient visits: 57.1 vs. 35.2%; emergency department (ED) visits: 10.5 vs. 1.8%; and inpatient visits: 5.6 vs. 0.7%) and months 2-13 (exacerbation: 25.1 vs. 21.1%; outpatient visits: 86.1 vs. 85.8%; ED visits: 20.0 vs. 15.7%; and inpatient visits: 6.5 vs. 5.3%). COPD- and pneumonia-associated costs for months 1 and 2-13 were higher in patients with influenza.

LIMITATIONS

The study was subject to a residual imbalance between cohorts despite propensity score matching. The use of diagnostic codes to select patients and identify complications could introduce inaccuracies in estimating events.

CONCLUSIONS

HRU and costs were higher in COPD patients with influenza during the first month and over the entire year following infection. This suggests influenza has an impact on respiratory health in patients with COPD that lasts beyond the acute infection.

Efficacy and safety of as-needed albuterol/budesonide versus albuterol in adults and children aged ≥4 years with moderate-to-severe asthma: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind, active-controlled MANDALA study

Introduction

Uncontrolled asthma is associated with substantial morbidity. While fast-acting bronchodilators provide quick relief from asthma symptoms, their use as rescue fails to address the underlying inflammation. Combining a short-acting beta₂-agonist, such as albuterol (salbutamol), with an inhaled corticosteroid, such as budesonide, in a single inhaler as rescue therapy could help control both bronchoconstriction and inflammation, and reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations.

Methods and analysis

The Phase 3 MANDALA study was designed to determine the efficacy of albuterol in combination with budesonide (albuterol/budesonide 180/160 µg or 180/80 µg, two actuations of 90/80 µg or 90/40 µg, respectively) versus albuterol (180 µg, two actuations of 90 µg) as rescue therapy in adult, adolescent and paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. This event-driven study enrolled symptomatic patients (3000 adults/adolescents and 100 children aged 4–11 years) who experienced ≥1 severe asthma exacerbation in the previous year and were receiving maintenance therapy for ≥3 months prior to study entry. The primary efficacy endpoint was time-to-first severe asthma exacerbation.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, and that are consistent with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and Good Clinical Practice and the applicable regulatory requirements.

Trial registration

NCT03769090.

Perceptions and experiences of a manual therapy trial: a qualitative study of people with moderate to severe COPD

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents with physical, emotional and social difficulties that affect quality of life. Multimodal management includes both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays an important role. Recent research has suggested that manual therapies may improve perceptions of dyspnea for people with COPD.

Methods

Focus group interviews were conducted as part of a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of implementing a manual therapy technique—muscle energy technique (MET)—as an adjunct to PR for people with moderate to severe COPD. Focus group interviews were conducted to examine trial participants views of the intervention and the trial design. A thematic analysis was undertaken to explore the data.

Results

Twelve participants with moderate to severe COPD participated in three focus groups. Participants were motivated to participate in the trial to be proactive about their health. They perceived MET to be a gentle, comfortable form of stretching that allowed them to ‘breathe easier’ and prepared them for PR. A small number of participants reported mild muscular discomfort during MET, but this was short-lasting and was not bothersome. Participants enjoyed the one-on-one contact with researchers and learned more about their breathing while performing spirometric testing. Most participants wanted longer and more frequent MET sessions, and some requested ‘homework’ stretching exercises.

Conclusions

The findings of this study show that a manual therapy intervention was received well by participants in a clinical trial setting. A small number of participants reported mild musculoskeletal discomfort in relation to the MET treatment. Participant preferences for additional and longer treatment sessions should be carefully considered against available resources in future clinical trials.

Trial registration

ANZCTR, ACTRN12618000801213. Registered 11 May 2018 - Retrospectively registered. http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374643&isReview=true

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00387-0.

Specialist Care in Individuals With Asthma Who Required Hospitalization: A Retrospective Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Patients who are at risk for severe asthma exacerbations should receive specialist care. However, the care pattern for such patients in the real world is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pattern of care among individuals with asthma who required hospitalization, and to identify factors associated with receiving asthma specialist care.

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based study using health administrative data from two Canadian provinces. Individuals aged 14 to 45 years who were newly diagnosed with asthma between 2006 and 2016 and had at least one hospitalization for asthma at or within 5 years after the initial asthma diagnosis were included. First, we calculated frequencies of primary and specialist care around the asthma diagnosis: 1 year before and 2 years after in a 6-month period. Next, among individuals diagnosed with asthma by a primary care physician, we used multivariable Cox regressions to identify factors associated with receiving specialist care.

RESULTS

For 1862 individuals included, we found that most (≥71% per time period) were cared for by primary care physicians 1 year before and 2 years after the asthma diagnosis; the percentage of individuals seen at least once by a specialist for asthma and/or asthma-related respiratory conditions during the first 6 months since the diagnosis did not exceed 40%. Among 1411 of 1862 individuals who were under primary care before the asthma diagnosis (76%), controlling for covariates, living in a rural area or a low-income neighborhood was associated with less likelihood of receiving specialist care.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations, more than half of individuals with asthma who required hospitalization did not receive specialist care during the first 2 years since the diagnosis. Identified factors associated with receiving asthma specialist care suggested that access is an important barrier to receiving recommended care.

Predictors of Opioid-related Adverse Pulmonary Events among Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Although opioids are frequently prescribed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is poor understanding regarding which individuals will experience pulmonary harm upon exposure.Objectives: We sought to identify patient characteristics and opioid drug properties predictive of opioid-related adverse pulmonary events among older adults with chronic COPD.Methods: A retrospective, population-based, cohort study design was used, analyzing Ontario heath administrative data. Individuals aged 66 years and older, with validated, physician-diagnosed COPD receiving a new opioid drug were included. Adverse pulmonary events (defined as an emergency room visit, hospitalization, or death related to either COPD or pneumonia) occurring within 30 days following new opioid receipt were considered. Multivariable-adjusted, cause-specific hazard modeling was used to identify predictors of adverse pulmonary events.Results: Out of 169,517 older adults with COPD receiving a new opioid, 4,861 (2.9%) experienced an adverse pulmonary event within 30 days. Factors independently predisposing to adverse pulmonary events included older age (≥85 yr old: hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.49), long-term-care home residence (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21-1.44), severe COPD exacerbation within the preceding year (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.77-3.17), comorbidities (including non-COPD lung disease [HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.23], congestive heart failure [HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.30], sleep disorder [HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.30], and dementia [HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24]); other psychoactive medication receipt, including benzodiazepines (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35) and serotonergic antidepressants (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19), and receipt of an opioid-only agent (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.26-1.46). Factors that independently protected from adverse pulmonary events included female sex (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.82), surgery within the preceding year (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.77), and musculoskeletal disease (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80). No significant associations were observed between adverse pulmonary events and opioid half-life duration or opioid daily dosage.Conclusions: Patient and opioid drug factors predictive of opioid-related adverse pulmonary events among older adults with COPD were identified, which may assist with safer opioid prescribing.

The Relationship Between the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge-20" Questionnaire and Clinical Factors in Patients with COPD: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

Inhaler therapy is the mainstay of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. Poor adherence causes disease exacerbation and affects patient mortality. Although the Adherence Starts with Knowledge-20 (ASK-20) questionnaire is a reliable tool for assessing medication adherence, the relationship between the ASK-20 and clinical factors in patients with COPD remains unknown. We investigated the relationship between the ASK-20 and clinical factors, and assessed real-world inhaler therapy use.

Patients and Methods

A multicenter, cross-sectional study of outpatients with COPD undergoing inhaler treatment who completed the ASK-20 questionnaire was performed. We investigated COPD-related health status using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression), respiratory function, patient satisfaction levels, and real-world inhaler therapy use.

Results

Of the total 319 patients, 87% were male with a median age of 74 years. Most patients had mild or moderate COPD, according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage. The total ASK-20 scores correlated significantly with the CAT, HADS-anxiety, and HADS-depression scores (r = 0.27, 0.33, and 0.29, respectively, p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that CAT and HADS-anxiety scores had an independent and significant impact on the ASK-20 scores [β, standardized regression coefficient: 0.18 (95% CI, 0.03–0.35; p = 0.02), and 0.29 (95% CI, 0.17–0.42; p < 0.01), respectively]; however, the ASK-20 scores were not correlated with age, sex, body mass index, cohabitation, modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale score, pulmonary function, disease duration, number of COPD exacerbations per year, comorbidities, inhaler numbers, nor inhaler components.

Conclusion

The ASK-20 scores in patients with COPD were significantly associated with CAT and HADS scores. In Japan, Respimat was prescribed to younger patients and patients with lower CAT scores. The ASK-20, a simple evaluation method, is useful for identifying clinical factors affecting adherence in patients with COPD.

COPD is Associated with Higher Prevalence of Back Pain: Results of a Population-Based Case-Control Study, 2017

Objective

We aimed to assess whether patients suffering from COPD have a higher prevalence of chronic back pain (neck and low back pain) than age-, sex-, and residence-matched non-COPD controls. We also aimed to identify which variables are associated with chronic neck pain (CNP) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) among COPD patients.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective case-control study using data obtained from the Spanish National Health Survey conducted in 2017.

Results

We analyzed data from 1034 COPD and 1034 matched non-COPD controls. The prevalence of CNP and CLBP was 38.20% and 45.16%, respectively, among COPD patients and 22.82% and 28.34% for non-COPD controls, respectively (p<0.001 for both). Multivariable analysis showed that COPD patients had a 1.62-fold (95% CI 1.50-1.74) higher risk of CNP and a 1.83-fold (95% CI 1.73-1.91) higher risk of CLBP than non-COPD controls. Experiencing one type of pain greatly increased the risk of having the other. Factors associated with the presence of both types of pain among COPD patients included female sex, "fair/poor/very poor" self-rated health, migraine or frequent headache and use of pain medication. Being aged from 70 to 79 years was a risk factor for CLBP, and suffering from a mental disorder was a risk factor for CNP.

Conclusion

The prevalence of CNP and CLBP was significantly higher among COPD patients than among non-COPD controls after adjusting for age, sex and other relevant clinical variables. Our findings add new data to the knowledge of chronic pain in COPD patients.

Asthma exacerbations and worsenings in patients aged 1-75 years with add-on tiotropium treatment

This review explores the effect of tiotropium Respimat® add-on therapy on asthma exacerbations and worsenings, adverse events (AEs) related to exacerbations and symptoms and any effects on seasonality across the 10 UniTinA-asthma® clinical trials comprising over 6000 patients. When added on to inhaled corticosteroids ± additional therapies, tiotropium significantly reduced the risk of exacerbations and worsenings in adults with symptomatic severe asthma and provided a non-significant improvement in worsenings in adults with symptomatic moderate and mild asthma, which was significant for patients with moderate asthma receiving tiotropium 2.5 µg once daily vs. placebo. Trials in paediatric patients were not powered to assess exacerbations or worsenings, but when AEs related to asthma exacerbations and symptoms were grouped into a composite endpoint and pooled, tiotropium improved outcomes vs. placebo (rate ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.63, 0.93). The reduction in exacerbations with tiotropium is apparent across all patients during the observed seasonal peaks of these events.

Bringing asthma care into the twenty-first century

Despite access to diagnostic tests and effective therapies, asthma often remains misdiagnosed and/or poorly controlled or uncontrolled. In this review, we address the key issues of asthma diagnosis and management, recent evidence for levels of asthma control, the consequences of poor control and, in line with that, explore the potential reasons for poor asthma control and acute exacerbations. Based on recent evidence and current guidelines, we also aim to provide practical answers to the key questions of how to improve asthma management, with the best possible prevention of exacerbations, addressing the basics-adherence, inhaler misuse, obesity and smoking-and how to facilitate a new era of asthma care in the twenty-first century. We hope this review will be useful to busy primary care clinicians in their future interactions with their patients with both suspected and proven asthma.

Patterns and predictors of low physical activity in patients with stable COPD: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Despite the frequency and negative impact of low physical activity among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), little is known about how it persists and remits over time or the factors predicting new states of low physical activity. The aim of the study was to determine the probability of a transition between states of low and nonlow physical activity in a cohort of patients with stable COPD followed for 2 years. We also investigated different potentially modifiable factors to determine whether they can predict new states of low physical activity.

METHODS

We prospectively included 137 patients with stable COPD (mean age 66.9 ± 8.3 years). Physical activity was measured at baseline and at 1 and 2 years of follow up. Low physical activity was defined according to energy expenditure by cut-off points from the Fried frailty model. The likelihood of annual transition towards new states and recovery was calculated. We evaluated demographic, frailty, nonrespiratory, and respiratory variables as potential predictors, using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

At baseline, 37 patients (27%) presented with low physical activity. During the study period, a total of 179 annual transitions were identified with nonlow physical activity at the beginning of the year; 17.5% transitioned to low physical activity. In contrast, 34.3% of the 67 transitions that started with low physical activity recovered. Predictors of transition to new states of low physical activity were dyspnea ⩾2 (odds ratio = 3.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-8.61) and poor performance on the five sit-to-stand test (odds ratio = 4.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.30-17.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The change between levels of low and nonlow physical activity is dynamic, especially for recovery. Annual transitions toward new states of low physical activity are likely among patients with dyspnea or poor performance on the five sit-to-stand test. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids for treating asthma-COPD overlap: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and effectiveness of current pharmacotherapies consisting of long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA) and/or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma-COPD overlap.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to June 2018.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Only studies comparing the safety and effectiveness of LABA and/or ICS in patients with asthma-COPD overlap were included. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using Inverse Variance Random-effects model.

RESULTS

From a total of 3382 articles retrieved, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), six cohort studies (CS), one nested case control study fulfilled the inclusion criteria for three independent meta-analyses representing 181,603 participants. Three CS results show LABA was associated with decreased risk of myocardial infarction (combined RR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87) versus non-LABA use; ICS/LABA was associated with a lower risk of death or hospitalization (combined RR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90) compared to no use. Results from RCTs, no clear difference in lung function decline in FEV₁ was found (combined mean difference: 0.08, 95% CI 0.15-0.32) in patients receiving ICS and/or LABA compared to placebo. However, due to lack of data, exacerbations, fractures and nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease outcomes were not meta-analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with asthma-COPD overlap, LABA is associated with decreased risk of myocardial infarction; and the combination therapy of ICS/LABA appears to reduce the risk of death or hospitalization. More studies of quality data and larger number of patients are needed.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42018090863).

The Effect of Defining Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by the Lower Limit of Normal of FEV1/FVC Ratio in Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat Participants

RATIONALE

There is continuing debate about whether to define airflow obstruction by a post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC) below 0.70, or by ratio values falling below the age-dependent lower limit of normal (LLN) derived from general population data.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether using the LLN criterion affects the classification and outcomes of patients previously defined as having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by the fixed FEV₁/FVC ratio.

METHODS

We applied the LLN definition to pooled data from the Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat study that used the fixed FEV₁/FVC ratio for the clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

RESULTS

A total of 17,072 patients were analyzed; of these, 1,807 (10.6%) patients had a ratio greater than or equal to LLN. Patients with a ratio greater than or equal to LLN had similar risks of death from any cause and fatal major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event as those below LLN. Patients with a ratio below LLN had a significantly lower risk of major adverse CV events (hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-0.86; P = 0.001), and had significantly greater risks of moderate to severe exacerbation (rate ratio = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.36-1.61; P < 0.0001) and severe exacerbation (rate ratio = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.68-2.40; P < 0.0001) when compared with patients greater than or equal to LLN. Study outcomes by treatment arm (5 μg tiotropium Respimat vs. 18 μg HandiHaler) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the LLN to define airflow obstruction would have excluded patients in the Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat study with a higher risk of nonfatal major adverse CV events and a lower risk of exacerbation; study outcomes by treatment arm (2.5 μg/5 μg tiotropium Respimat vs. 18 μg HandiHaler) remained similar. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01126437).

The impact of integrated disease management in high-risk COPD patients in primary care

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a reduced quality of life (QoL) and exacerbations that drive health service utilization (HSU). A majority of patients with COPD are managed in primary care. Our objective was to evaluate an integrated disease management, self-management, and structured follow-up intervention (IDM) for high-risk patients with COPD in primary care. This was a one-year multi-center randomized controlled trial. High-risk, exacerbation-prone COPD patients were randomized to IDM provided by a certified respiratory educator and physician, or usual physician care. IDM received case management, self-management education, and skills training. The primary outcome, COPD-related QoL, was measured using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Of 180 patients randomized from 8 sites, 81.1% completed the study. Patients were 53.6% women, mean age 68.2 years, post-bronchodilator FEV1 52.8% predicted, and 77.4% were Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease Stage D. QoL-CAT scores improved in IDM patients, 22.6 to 14.8, and worsened in usual care, 19.3 to 22.0, adjusted difference 9.3 (p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes including the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, Bristol Knowledge Questionnaire, and FEV1 demonstrated differential improvements in favor of IDM of 1.29 (p < 0.001), 29.6% (p < 0.001), and 100 mL, respectively (p = 0.016). Compared to usual care, significantly fewer IDM patients had a severe exacerbation, -48.9% (p < 0.001), required an urgent primary care visit for COPD, -30.2% (p < 0.001), or had an emergency department visit, -23.6% (p = 0.001). We conclude that IDM self-management and structured follow-up substantially improved QoL, knowledge, FEV1, reduced severe exacerbations, and HSU, in a high-risk primary care COPD population. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02343055.

Repeated exacerbation of asthma: An intrinsic phenotype of uncontrolled asthma

Asthma is a chronic disease of the airways affecting a large number of people across the globe. Uncontrolled asthma poses an emotional as well as the physical burden on patients and results in a great economic burden. “Exacerbation-prone phenotype” asthmatics are a cluster of patients who may suffer from more frequent and severe exacerbations than other asthmatics. Factors such as inadequate symptom control, improper adherence to medications, and incorrect use of inhalers are responsible for frequent asthma exacerbations. Caring for the patient with “exacerbation-prone asthma” needs participation from both the doctor as well as the patient. Self-management, improving knowledge about the disease, control of comorbidities, and a stepwise approach with the use of a single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy in patients with severe asthma could help in delivering better care for the “exacerbation-prone phenotype” of asthmatics.

A pilot randomized controlled trial on the impact of text messaging check-ins and a web-based asthma action plan versus a written action plan on asthma exacerbations

OBJECTIVE

We compared electronic asthma action plans (eAAP) supported by automated text messaging service (SMS) with written asthma action plans (AAP) on assessing acceptability and asthma control improvement. We hypothesized that the patients in eAAP group would have more improvements in their quality of life, asthma control and decreased asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

Patients with physician-diagnosed asthma having at least one asthma exacerbation in the previous 12 months were recruited. Participants received individualized action plans and were randomly assigned into either the intervention (eAAP) or control (AAP) group. Intervention participants received weekly SMS, triggering assessment of asthma control and viewing their eAAP. We assessed applicability of Telehealth platform on asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and quality of life over a 12-month period.

RESULTS

106 patients were enrolled (eAAP = 52, AAP = 54). The cumulative response rate to all weekly SMS check-ins was 68.4%. Overall, 28% of patients checked into their eAAP during the intervention period. There were fewer exacerbations in the eAAP group (18%) compared to the AAP group (RR = 0.82 [95%CI 0.49, 1.36]), (P = 0.44). The mean scores for asthma control and quality of life were higher in the eAAP group compared to the AAP group by 4% (RR = 1.04 [95%CI 0.83, 1.30]), (P =  0.73) and 5.5% (RR = 1.06 [95%CI 0.87, 1.28]), (P = 0.59), respectively, but were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the eAAP presented improved asthma control outcomes, but as expected the sample size was inadequate to show a significant difference, but based on this pilot study we plan a larger appropriately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Symbicort® Maintenance and Reliever Therapy (SMART) and the evolution of asthma management within the GINA guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) annual report summarizes the latest evidence for asthma management. GINA recommends stepwise pharmacological treatment, advocating inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus rapid, long-acting β₂-agonists (LABA) delivered in a single inhaler for maintenance and relief at Steps 3 (moderate persistent asthma requiring 1-2 controllers plus as-needed reliever), 4 (severe persistent asthma requiring ≥2 controllers plus as-needed reliever), and 5 (higher level care and/or add-on treatment). Areas covered: Randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence demonstrate that flexibly dosed budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and relief (Symbicort® Maintenance And Reliever Therapy [SMART]) is associated with reductions in severe exacerbations, prolongs time to first exacerbation, and provides fast symptom relief. Expert commentary: SMART provides greater or equal levels of sustained asthma control than similar or higher fixed doses of ICS/LABA plus short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) as needed or higher ICS plus SABA as needed, with lower overall ICS doses and cost. The simplified dosing strategy may improve adherence and overall asthma control but relies on patient education. Budesonide/formoterol as needed in mild asthma (patients qualifying for regular low-dose ICS) is currently under investigation in two double-blind randomized studies, SYGMA1/2 (NCT02149199/NCT02224157), comparing budesonide/formoterol as needed with budesonide plus SABA and SABA alone.

Multidimensional approach for the proper management of a complex chronic patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with comorbidities occurring either independently or as consequences of COPD. Areas covered: This review examines the interactions between the pathophysiology of COPD and the most frequent comorbidities, and highlights the need for multidimensional clinical strategies to manage COPD patients with comorbidities. Expert commentary: Most COPD patients need to be approached in a complex and multifactorial scenario. The diagnosis of COPD is necessarily based on the presence of chronic respiratory symptoms and poorly reversible airflow obstruction, but exacerbations and comorbidities need to be considered in the evaluation of disease severity and prognosis in individual patients. More importantly, defining the precise relationship between COPD and comorbidities for each patient is the basis for a correct therapeutic approach.

The development, implementation and evaluation of clinical pathways for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan: protocol for an interrupted times series evaluation

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has substantial economic and human costs; it is expected to be the third leading cause of death worldwide by 2030. To minimize these costs high quality guidelines have been developed. However, guidelines alone rarely result in meaningful change. One method of integrating guidelines into practice is the use of clinical pathways (CPWs). CPWs bring available evidence to a range of healthcare professionals by detailing the essential steps in care and adapting guidelines to the local context.

METHODS/DESIGN

We are working with local stakeholders to develop CPWs for COPD with the aims of improving care while reducing utilization. The CPWs will employ several steps including: standardizing diagnostic training, unifying components of chronic disease care, coordinating education and reconditioning programs, and ensuring care uses best practices. Further, we have worked to identify evidence-informed implementation strategies which will be tailored to the local context. We will conduct a three-year research project using an interrupted time series (ITS) design in the form of a multiple baseline approach with control groups. The CPW will be implemented in two health regions (experimental groups) and two health regions will act as controls (control groups). The experimental and control groups will each contain an urban and rural health region. Primary outcomes for the study will be quality of care operationalized using hospital readmission rates and emergency department (ED) presentation rates. Secondary outcomes will be healthcare utilization and guideline adherence, operationalized using hospital admission rates, hospital length of stay and general practitioner (GP) visits. Results will be analyzed using segmented regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

Funding has been procured from multiple stakeholders. The project has been deemed exempt from ethics review as it is a quality improvement project. Intervention implementation is expected to begin in summer of 2017. This project is expected to improve quality of care and reduce healthcare utilization. In addition it will provide evidence on the effects of CPWs in both urban and rural settings. If the CPWs are found effective we will work with all stakeholders to implement similar CPWs in surrounding health regions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03075709 ). Registered 8 March 2017.

Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Contributes to the Burden of Health Care Use. Data from the CanCOLD Study

RATIONALE

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains undiagnosed in many individuals with persistent airflow limitation. These individuals may be susceptible to exacerbation-like respiratory events that consume health care resources.

OBJECTIVES

To compare exacerbation-like respiratory events, event prevalence, and differences in the odds of using medication and/or health services between subjects with diagnosed and undiagnosed COPD.

METHODS

Subjects sampled from the general population participating in the CanCOLD (Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease) study, with at least 12 months of exacerbation-event follow-up who were classified as having physician-diagnosed or undiagnosed COPD were assessed. Exacerbation-like respiratory events were captured using a questionnaire administered every 3 months.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 355 subjects were undiagnosed and 150 were diagnosed with COPD. Undiagnosed subjects were less symptomatic and functionally impaired, had been prescribed fewer respiratory medications, and had better health status. The incidence of reported exacerbation-like events was higher in diagnosed subjects and increased in both groups with the severity of airflow obstruction. Although subjects with diagnosed COPD were more often prescribed medication for exacerbation events, health service use for exacerbation events was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Most subjects with COPD in Canada remain undiagnosed. These subjects are less symptomatic and impaired, which may partly explain lack of diagnosis. Although patients with undiagnosed COPD experience fewer exacerbations than those with diagnosed COPD, they use a similar amount of health services for exacerbation events; thus, the overall health system burden of exacerbations in those with undiagnosed COPD is considerable.

Optimizing bronchodilation in the prevention of COPD exacerbations

The natural disease course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often punctuated by exacerbations: acute events of symptom worsening associated with significant morbidity and healthcare resource utilization; reduced quality of life; and increased risk of hospitalization and death. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommend that patients at risk of exacerbations (GOLD Groups C and D) receive a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/LAMA combination, respectively, as preferred initial treatments. The latter recommendation is based on recent trial evidence demonstrating the superior efficacy of a fixed-dose LABA/LAMA over an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA in exacerbation prevention. ICS in combination with a LABA is also indicated for prevention of exacerbations, but the use of ICS is associated with an increased risk of adverse events such as pneumonia, and offers limited benefits beyond those provided by LABA or LAMA monotherapy. In this review, we examine evidence from a number of pivotal studies of LABAs and LAMAs, administered as monotherapy or as part of dual or triple combination therapy, with a specific focus on their effect on exacerbations. We also discuss a new proposed treatment paradigm for the management of COPD that takes into account this recent evidence and adopts a more cautious approach to the use of ICS. In alignment with GOLD 2017, we suggest that ICS should be reserved for patients with concomitant asthma or in whom exacerbations persist despite treatment with LABA/LAMA.

Results of Physiotherapy Treatments in Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review

Purpose: The objective of this study was to review clinical trials of the effectiveness of physiotherapy compared with standard care, focused mainly on the functional status of patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods: Search strategies were developed for each of the databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). The study eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) The objective was to assess the effect and efficacy of physiotherapy compared with standard care (which included only medical and pharmacological treatment); (2) adults subjects had AECOPD; (3) one of the outcome measures was functional status, defined as an individual's ability to perform the normal daily activities required to meet basic needs, fulfill usual roles, and maintain health and well-being; (4) it was a clinical trial; (5) it was written in English; (6) it was published between January 2009 and February 2016; and (7) the full-text article was available. Results: The review revealed that for patients hospitalized for AECOPD, exercise, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, breathing exercises, and chest therapy significantly improved their functional status compared with standard care. Conclusions: A variety of physiotherapy modalities have been shown to improve functional status compared with standard care among patients hospitalized for AECOPD; other outcome measures also showed improvements.

Home oxygen therapy: evidence versus reality

INTRODUCTION

LTOT is a well-established treatment option for hypoxemic patients. Scientific evidence for its benefits of LTOT dates back to the 1980s, when two randomized controlled trials showed prolonged survival in COPD-patients undergoing LTOT for at least 15 hours/day. In contrast, the potential benefits of LTOT in non-COPD-patients has not been well researched and the recommendations for its application are primarily extrapolated from trials on COPD-patients. Recently, a large trial confirmed that COPD-patients who don't meet classic indication criteria, and have moderate desaturation at rest or during exercise, do not benefit from oxygen therapy. Also the significant technical evolution of LTOT devices has improved its application. Areas covered: A literature research was performed in pubmed regarding home oxygen therapy (terms: LTOT, ambulatory oxygen therapy, short burst oxygen therapy, nocturnal oxygen therapy). Expert commentary: LTOT proved a survival benefit for COPD patients about 30 years ago. Whether the results of these trials are still valid for patients under modern treatment guidelines remains unknown. Nevertheless, the classic indication criteria for LTOT still persist in guidelines, since there is a lack of updated evidence for the effects of LTOT in more severe hypoxemic patients.

History of Asthma in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Comparative Study of Economic Burden

RATIONALE

A diagnosis of asthma is considered an independent risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, little is known about health service use patterns in patients with COPD who have a history of asthma in comparison with those without such a history, especially regarding comorbid conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the excess costs of COPD in patients with a history of asthma (COPD+asthma) versus those with COPD without such a history (COPD-only); to estimate excess costs attributable to inpatient care, outpatient care, medications, and community care; and to estimate excess costs attributable to comorbid conditions.

METHODS

We used vital statistics, inpatient and outpatient encounters, filled prescription records, and community care data of patients in British Columbia, Canada, from 1997 to 2012 to create propensity score-matched COPD+asthma and COPD-only cohorts. We calculated and compared the excess medical costs (in 2012 Canadian dollars [$]) between the two groups on the basis of billing information. Comorbidities were ascertained from the inpatient and outpatient records and were classified on the basis of major categories of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 22,565 individuals within each group (mean age at baseline, 67.9 yr; 57.0% female; average follow-up, 4.07 yr). Excess costs of COPD+asthma were $540.7 per patient-year (PY) (95% confidence interval [CI], $301.7-$779.8; P < 0.001). Costs of medications ($657.9/PY; P < 0.001) and outpatient services ($127.6/PY; P < 0.001) were higher in COPD+asthma, but costs of hospitalizations were lower (-$271.0/PY; P = 0.002). Community care costs in the two groups were similar (P = 0.257). The excess cost of respiratory-related conditions was $856.2/PY (P < 0.001), with $552.6/PY being due to respiratory-related medications (P < 0.001); costs of all other conditions combined were lower in COPD+asthma, mainly due to lower costs of cardiovascular diseases (-$201.8/PY; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with COPD with a previous history of asthma consume more health care resources than those with COPD alone, but there are important differences in cost components and costs attributable to comorbid conditions. Further research is required to examine whether the lower costs of cardiovascular disease in these patients is due to lower levels of related risk factors or to intrinsic differences in COPD phenotypes.

Effects of clinical pathways for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on patient, professional and systems outcomes: protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory syndrome characterized by progressive, partially reversible airway obstruction and lung hyperinflation. COPD has a substantial burden which is seen in both patient quality of life and healthcare costs. One proposed method of minimizing this burden is the implementation of clinical pathways (CPWs). CPWs aim to guide evidence-based practice and improve the interaction between health services. They bring the best available evidence to a range of healthcare professionals by adapting evidence-based clinical guidelines to a local context and detailing the essential steps in the assessment and care of patients.

METHODS

The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize existing literature on the effects of CPWs for the treatment or management of COPD. We will screen search hits from search strategies developed for a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) systematic review on the use of CPWs in primary care and a Cochrane EPOC review on the use of CPWs in hospitals. These searches were run in a range of databases. Studies will be screened independently by two reviewers. All studies identified by our search strategy will be considered regardless of study design as long as they meet the operational definition for clinical pathways developed by Kinsman et al. (BMC Medicine 8, 2010) and focus on the treatment or management of COPD. All included studies will be evaluated for risk of bias utilizing methodologies set out by the Cochrane collaboration. Data regarding patient, professional and systems outcomes will be extracted from all included studies. Data will be presented in both narrative and tabular form.

DISCUSSION

The systematic review outlined in this protocol aims to identify, assess and synthesise all available evidence on the effects of CPWs regarding the treatment and management of COPD. As a result, this review will provide an evidence base for decision makers regarding the practicality, cost effectiveness, patient benefit and best practices regarding the implementation of CPWs for the care of COPD.

Office-Based Case Finding for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Older Adults in Primary Care

Background. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed in primary care. Aim. To explore the utility of proactive identification of COPD in patients 75 years of age and older in a Canadian primary care setting. Methods. Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) screening questions were administered to patients with a smoking history of 20 pack-years or more; those with a positive screen were referred for postbronchodilator spirometry. Results. A total of 107 patients (21%), of 499 screened, had a 20-pack-year smoking history; 105 patients completed the CTS screening. Forty-four (42%) patients were positive on one or more questions on the screening; significantly more patients with a previous diagnosis of COPD (64%) were positive on the CTS compared to those without a previous diagnosis of COPD (30%). Of those who were not previously diagnosed with COPD (N = 11), four (36%) were newly diagnosed with COPD. Conclusion. A systematic two-stage method of screening for COPD, using CTS screening questions followed by spirometric confirmation, is feasible in the context of a busy primary care setting. More research is needed to assess the value of restricting screening to patients with a smoking history of 20 pack-years and on the sensitivity and specificity of these measures.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and HIV: are we appropriately screening?

Individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) represent a population that is at a higher risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we sought to determine the effects of smoking on respiratory symptoms and diseases among HIV-positive patients and to determine if symptomatic patients are being appropriately screened for COPD. HIV-positive individuals completed a self-administered questionnaire. The effects of smoking on respiratory symptoms and diseases were reported as odds ratios (ORs). The COPD screening criteria were adapted from the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) guidelines. Two hundred and forty-seven participants were recruited. The median age was 49 years; 75% were male and 92% were on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Smokers represented 66% of the population. Smoking had a statistically significant effect on respiratory symptoms including wheeze (OR 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-14.2]), phlegm production (OR 4.9 [95% CI: 2.2-10.5]), cough (OR 7.0 [95% CI: 3.0-16.2]), and dyspnea (OR 7.2 [95% CI: 1.7-31.2]). Smoking had a higher odds of respiratory diseases including COPD (OR 4.9 [95% CI: 1.1-21.9]) and bronchitis (OR 3.8 [95% CI: 1.9-7.7]). Among HIV-positive smokers, 40% met the CTS screening criteria, while only 12% self-reported a diagnosis of COPD. The burden of smoking in the HIV population is significant. HIV-positive smokers are more likely to report both respiratory symptoms and diseases than HIV-positive non-smokers. A discrepancy exists between patients who met the CTS screening criteria and those who were diagnosed with COPD, raising the concern for under-recognition and under-diagnosis of COPD in this population.

Pharmacological management of breathlessness in COPD: recent advances and hopes for the future

INTRODUCTION

Activity-related breathlessness is often the dominant symptom in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and usually persists despite optimal medical therapy. Currently, our inability to meaningfully alter the pathophysiology of the underlying disease means that we must focus our attention on relieving this distressing symptom so as to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

The current review examines the neurobiology of breathlessness and constructs a solid physiological rationale for amelioration of this distressing symptom. We will examine the efficacy of interventions which: 1) reduce the increased central drive to breathe (opioids); 2) improve the respiratory system's ability to appropriately respond to this increased demand (bronchodilators); and 3) address the important affective dimension of breathlessness (anxiolytics). Expert commentary: Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of activity-related breathlessness in COPD, and its measurement in the clinical domain, now set the stage for the development of effective management strategies on an individual patient basis.

The Expert Patient and Chronic Respiratory Diseases

The concept of “expert patient” has been developed in the last two decades to define a patient who has a significant knowledge of his/her disease and treatment in addition to self-management skills. However, this concept has evolved over the last years, and these patients are now considered, not only to be more efficient in the management of their own condition and communicating effectively with health professionals, but to also act as educators for other patients and as resources for the last, provide feedback on care delivery, and be involved in the production and implementation of practice guidelines, as well as in the development and conduct of research initiatives. There are some barriers, however, to the integration of this new contributor to the health care team, and specific requirements need to be considered for an individual to be considered as an expert. This new player has, however, a potentially important role to improve current care, particularly in respiratory health.

Multidisciplinary COPD disease management program: impact on clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized performance improvement interventions would improve COPD guideline-recommended care and decrease COPD exacerbations in primary care clinic practices.

METHODS

We initiated a performance improvement project in 12 clinics to improve COPD outcomes incorporating physician education, case management, web-based decision support (CareManager(TM)), and performance feedback. We collected baseline and one-year follow up data on 242 patients who had COPD with acute exacerbations. We analyzed data by two methods. First, the 12 clinics were cluster randomized to 4 intervention (117 patients) and 8 control (125 patients) clinics which all had access to CareManager(TM) but only intervention clinic physicians received case management, academic detailing, and decision support assistance. Exacerbation rates and guideline adherence were compared. Second, data from all 12 clinics were pooled in a quasi-experimental design comparing baseline and post-implementation of CareManager(TM) to determine the value of system-wide performance improvement during the study period.

RESULTS

In the randomized analysis, baseline demographics were similar. No differences (p = 0.79) occurred in exacerbation rates between intervention and control clinics although both groups had decreased numbers of exacerbations from baseline to follow up (p < 0.05). The pooled data from all 12 clinics demonstrated a reduction (p < 0.05) in mean exacerbations/patient from 2.3 (CI 2.0-2.6) during baseline to 1.4 (CI 1.1-1.7) at one-year follow up. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations/patient decreased (p = 0.003). Patients naïve at study start to depression screening, pneumococcal vaccination, inhaled control medications or smoking cessation had fewer (p < 0.05) exacerbations after these interventions.

CONCLUSION

We observed no difference in exacerbation rates between clinics receiving case management, academic detailing, and ongoing assistance with decision support and controls. Implementation of a web-based disease management system (CareManager(TM)) along with health system-wide COPD performance improvement efforts was associated with fewer COPD exacerbations and increased adherence to guideline recommendations.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: an epidemiologic cohort study from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mostly managed within primary care, but there is little Canadian evidence from this setting. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD in primary care practices, and the degree of comorbidity with other chronic conditions, and to assess patterns of medication prescribing.

METHODS

The Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network is a national "network of networks" whose member practices use electronic medical records (EMRs). At the time of the study, it included data from 444 physicians from 10 networks in 8 provinces. We conducted an epidemiologic cohort study of all patients who had EMR data collected by the network at the end of 2012. Validated case-finding algorithms were used to identify cases of COPD. We used descriptive statistics and multivariate modelling analyses to calculate the prevalence of COPD, its association with key demographic factors and comorbidities, and patterns of medication prescribing.

RESULTS

The observed prevalence of COPD was 4.0% (10 043/250 346), which represents a population prevalence of 3.4% using age-sex standardization. Comorbidity was common, with prevalence ratios ranging from 1.1 for the presence of a single comorbid condition to 1.9 for 4 or more comorbid conditions. Anticholinergic agents (63%), short- (48%) and long-acting (38%) β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (41%) were the most commonly used medications.

INTERPRETATION

The prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD in Canadian primary care practices was similar to that reported in other practice-based studies at about 3%-4%. Most patients had comorbid conditions and were taking multiple medications. EMR data may be useful to assess both the epidemiology and management of COPD in primary care practices.

Quality assurance of spirometry in a population-based study -predictors of good outcome in spirometry testing

BACKGROUND

The assurance of high-quality spirometry testing remains a challenge.

METHODS

Spirometry training consisted of standardized coaching followed by certification for 35 spirometry-naïve and 9 spirometry-experienced research assistants. Spirometry was performed before and after bronchodilator (BD) in random population samples of 5176 people aged 40 years and older from 9 sites in Canada. using the hand-held EasyOne spirometer (ndd Medical Technologies Inc., Andover, MA, USA). Pulmonary function quality assurance with over reading was conducted centrally in Vancouver: spirograms were reviewed and graded according to ATS/ERS standards with prompt feedback to the technician at each site. Descriptive statistics were calculated for manoeuvre acceptability and repeatability variables. A logistic regression model was constructed for the predictors of spirometry quality success.

RESULTS

95% of test sessions achieved pre-determined quality standards for back extrapolated volume (BEV), time to peak flow (PEFT) and end of test volume (EOTV). The mean forced expiratory time (FET) was 11.2 seconds. Then, 90% and 95% of all manoeuvres had FEV1 and FVC that were repeatable within 150 ml and 200 ml respectively. Test quality was slightly better for post-BD test sessions compared with pre-BD for both groups of research assistants. Independent predictors of acceptable test quality included participant characteristics: female sex, younger age, greater BD responsiveness; but not study site or prior experience in completing spirometry by the technologist.

CONCLUSIONS

Good quality spirometry tests are attainable in large multicenter epidemiological studies by trained research assistants, irrespective of their prior experience in spirometry.

Improving early-stage diagnosis and management of COPD in primary care

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease, but it often remains undetected in its mild and moderate forms. Patients frequently remain undiagnosed and untreated until the disease has become severe and debilitating, greatly impacting their quality of life. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are most often the first point of contact, and therefore they are in the best position to identify patients at risk of COPD in the early stages. Consequently, they play a critical role in the management of the disease, particularly smoking cessation. One of the earliest symptoms is activity-related dyspnea and subsequent exercise intolerance, often compensated for by reduction in physical activity. This review addresses the approaches used to identify COPD in the primary care setting, including simple tools such as handheld spirometers and questionnaires. A recent study demonstrated that, compared with usual care, use of the COPD Population Screener questionnaire alone and in combination with the copd-6 handheld spirometer significantly improved the odds of referral of patients with suspected COPD for pulmonary function testing or to a pulmonologist. Identification of patients suspected of having the disease and differentiation of COPD from asthma are important in order that treatment can be initiated in the mild stages to slow or prevent disease progression and reduce the risk of exacerbations. The review also discusses the evidence to date on pharmacologic treatment using short-acting and long-acting anticholinergics and β2-agonists, and nonpharmacologic interventions, such as smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in patients with mild and moderate COPD.

Impact of adherence to treatment with tiotropium and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases patients

OBJECTIVE

Poor adherence to treatment may contribute to the treatment gap in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). The aim of the current study was to describe the association between adherence to treatment and the risk of COPD moderate (ME) and severe (SE) exacerbations, and health care utilization.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Observational single cohort study utilizing the Quebec Provincial Health Insurance databases. All patients older than 40 years with a diagnosis of COPD between 2001 and 2010 were entered in the study cohort at the time of their first prescription for tiotropium (TIO) alone or co-administered with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (TIO + FSC). Follow-up continued to the last known claim or death. Adherence was measured by the medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% and persistence defined as no treatment gap ≥30 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ME was defined as use of an oral corticosteroid or antibiotic, SE as COPD related hospitalization or an emergency room (ER) visit. COPD related health care resource utilization ascertained was prescription of rescue medications, ER visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, intubations, and general practitioner (GP) and respirologist visits.

RESULTS

There were 23,707 patients included in this study. Compliance and persistence with TIO for monotherapy patients were 61.1% and 47.6% respectively. For patients treated with TIO + FSC, compliance and persistence for TIO were 62.9% and 45.3% respectively, and for FSC they were 35.4% and 33.0%. Multivariate analyses showed a significant (P < 0.001) adjusted odds ratios for ME (OR(ME)) and SE (OR(SE)) for TIO compliant vs. non-compliant patients (TIO: OR(ME) = 0.543, OR(SE) = 0.712; TIO + FSC: OR(ME) = 0.436, OR(SE) = 0.570). Similarly for FSC compliance: OR(ME) = 0.546; OR(SE) = 0.749. Similar results were observed for persistence. Compliance and persistence with TIO and FSC were associated with significantly reduced rates of health care utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the typical limitations of an administrative database study, the results of this large population-based study have shown that reduced adherence to treatment with TIO and FSC is associated with increased risk for exacerbations and higher health care utilization in COPD patients.

Recent advances in COPD disease management with fixed-dose long-acting combination therapies

Combinations of two long-acting bronchodilators and long-acting bronchodilators with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended therapies in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Three fixed-dose combination products have recently been approved for the treatment of COPD (the long-acting β2-agonist plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LABA/LAMA] combinations glycopyrronium/indacaterol [QVA149] and umeclidinium/vilanterol, and the LABA/ICS fluticasone furoate/vilanterol), with others currently in late-stage development. LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS combination therapies demonstrate positive effects on both lung function and patient-reported outcomes, with significant improvements observed with LABA/LAMA combinations compared with placebo, each component alone and other comparators in current use. No new safety concerns have been observed with combinations of long-acting bronchodilators. Combinations of two long-acting bronchodilators represent a new and convenient treatment option in COPD. This review summarizes published efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of both LABA/LAMA and novel LABA/ICS combinations in patients with COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exacerbations: clinician insights from the global Hidden Depths of COPD survey

OBJECTIVE

This real-life, global study aimed to investigate current views of and clinical practice in the management of COPD and its exacerbations, among clinicians from both the primary and secondary care settings.

METHODOLOGY

We devised an online questionnaire about COPD management and invited 13,613 general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory specialists to respond. Participating clinicians, recruited from an established research panel, treated a minimum of 10 (GPs) or 20 (respiratory specialists) patients with COPD per month. Completed responses were collected from 1400 clinicians from 14 countries.

RESULTS

A third of GPs and respiratory specialists reported that the main goal of COPD management was to improve patients' quality of life; only 14% of GPs thought that the prevention of exacerbations was a priority. The study showed a strong preference for inhaled corticosteroids in combination with other treatments, rather than as sole therapy, in line with global guidelines. Fewer GPs than respiratory specialists routinely recommended anticholinergics, pulmonary rehabilitation or oxygen therapy. Clinicians reported that 55% (GPs) and 57% (respiratory specialists) of their COPD patients had experienced an exacerbation in the previous 12 months. Although higher than those reported in clinical trials, these rates were lower than patients' own estimates from a corresponding patient survey, even in mild COPD patients (62%; 80% in severe patients). Despite this, 74% of GPs and 67% of respiratory physicians reported satisfaction with therapies to prevent exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

This global survey revealed that clinicians' main goal when managing COPD was to improve the lives of their patients, and that few viewed reducing exacerbations as a priority. Despite a relatively high level of adherence to treatment recommendations, it appears that clinicians, particularly GPs, underestimate the frequency and impact of exacerbations. These results suggest a need to raise awareness of exacerbations among both GPs and respiratory specialists.

Do isolated leg exercises improve dyspnea during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Dyspnea, the subjective feeling of shortness of breath, is a hallmark feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs aim to improve dyspnea, thereby increasing exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Exercise training is proven to be an essential component of PR; however, there is no consensus regarding which training modality confers the greatest therapeutic benefit. Secondary to pulmonary impairment, many COPD patients develop limb muscle dysfunction (LMD), particularly in the leg muscles. Mounting evidence suggests that peripheral limitation to exercise as a result of LMD is frequent in patients with COPD. LMD of the legs, or lower limb muscle dysfunction, has been shown to markedly influence ventilatory and dyspnea responses to exercise. Accordingly, isolated training of leg muscles may contribute to reducing dyspnea and increase exercise tolerance in patients with COPD. Indeed, relative to the largely irreversible impairment of the pulmonary system, the leg muscles are an important site by which to improve patients’ level of function and quality of life. Isolated leg exercises have been shown to improve LMD and may constitute an effective training modality to improve dyspnea and exercise tolerance in COPD within the context of PR.

Effect of physical training on airway inflammation in bronchial asthma: a systematic review

Background

The majority of the global population cannot afford existing asthma pharmacotherapy. Physical training as an airway anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma could potentially be a non-invasive, easily available, affordable, and healthy treatment modality. However, effects of physical training on airway inflammation in asthma are currently inconclusive. The main objective of this review is to summarize the effects of physical training on airway inflammation in asthmatics.

Methods

A peer reviewed search was applied to Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and DARE databases. We included all observational epidemiological research studies and RCTs. Studies evaluating at least one marker of airway inflammation in asthmatics after a period of physical training were selected. Data extraction was performed in a blinded fashion. We decided a priori to avoid pooling of the data in anticipation of heterogeneity of the studies, specifically heterogeneity of airway inflammatory markers studied as outcome measures.

Results

From the initial 2635 studies; 23 studies (16 RCTs and 7 prospective cohort studies) were included. Study sizes were generally small (median sample size = 30). There was a reduction in C-reactive protein, malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, sputum cell counts and IgE in asthmatics with physical training. Mixed results were observed after training for fractional excretion of nitric oxide and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The data was not pooled owing to significant heterogeneity between studies, and a funnel plot tests for publication bias were not performed because there were less than 10 studies for almost all outcome measures. Physical training intervention type, duration, intensity, frequency, primary outcome measures, methods of assessing outcome measures, and study designs were heterogeneous.

Conclusion

Due to reporting issues, lack of information and heterogeneity there was no definite conclusion; however, some findings suggest physical training may reduce airway inflammation in asthmatics.

Diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Swiss guidelines. Official guidelines of the Swiss Respiratory Society

The new Swiss Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Guidelines are based on a previous version, which was published 10 years ago. The Swiss Respiratory Society felt the need to update the previous document due to new knowledge and novel therapeutic developments about this prevalent and important disease. The recommendations and statements are based on the available literature, on other national guidelines and, in particular, on the GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) report. Our aim is to advise pulmonary physicians, general practitioners and other health care workers on the early detection and diagnosis, prevention, best symptomatic control, and avoidance of COPD as well as its complications and deterioration.

Opioid therapy for refractory dyspnea in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patients' experiences and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea that is refractory to conventional treatments affects up to 50% of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although professional societies recommend opioids in this setting, evidence supporting their use over months is limited. We conducted a multicentre mixed-methods study to understand patients' experiences when opioids are added to optimized conventional treatments for advanced COPD.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients (median age 74, range 51-89 years) agreed to participate in this 6-month study. After baseline assessments, immediate-release morphine sulfate syrup (initially 0.5 mg twice daily) was slowly titrated upward based on weekly assessments of symptoms. We conducted semistructured interviews and collected contemporaneous measures of health-related quality of life, severity of dyspnea, anxiety, depression, global ratings of opioid "helpfulness" and adverse effects before, at 2 months and at 4-6 months after opioids were started.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients, 32 (73%) completed the trial; 27 (90%) of 30 patients reported the opioid treatment as very (43%) or somewhat (47%) helpful. Three main themes emerged from the patients' overall positive experiences: small gains have big impact; realign hopes with reality; and "try it." Significant improvements were observed in median (interquartile range) scores between baseline and 4-6 months' assessment for health-related quality of life (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: 3.5 [2.8-4.0] v. 4.2 [3.6-4.8]; and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Dyspnea domain: 2.8 [2.3-3.6] v. 3.9 [2.8-4.5]) and decreases in severity of dyspnea (numerical rating scale: 7.0 [5.0-8.0] v. 5.0 [4.0-6.0]). Adverse effects were minimal for most patients.

INTERPRETATION

Opioids were a helpful and acceptable intervention for refractory dyspnea in patients with advanced COPD. Many of the patients experienced sustained benefits over months, which supports recent recommendations to consider opioids in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov, no. NCT00982891.