Consensus in Guidelines for Evaluation of DSD by the Texas Children's Hospital Multidisciplinary Gender Medicine Team

"Good practices" in pediatric clinical care for disorders/differences of sex development

PURPOSE

To define, benchmark, and publicize elements of quality care (i.e., "good practices") for pediatric patients with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD).

METHODS

Principles of quality care were identified by literature review; consensus exists for 11 good practices and adherence was evaluated through online survey of 21 North American clinical sites.

RESULTS

Strong uptake was observed for many practices, particularly specialty participation (n ≥ 17 of 21 sites for most core specialties); point of contact (n = 18); expertise in gender dysphoria/dissatisfaction (n = 20); and DSD-specific continuing medical education (n = 18). Greater variability was apparent for frequency of peer support referrals (n = 12 universally practiced); standardized questionnaires for routine assessment of psychosocial adaptation (n = 13) and gender development (n = 10); consistently clarifying patient/family values in decision-making (n = 15); genital exam protocols that exclude trainee education as primary reason (n = 15); and internal patient-tracking efforts (n = 5-10 of 20 sites).

CONCLUSION

This study employed a novel approach to designate DSD good practices and identified areas of consistency and variation in these DSD clinical practices. Good practice benchmarking facilitates quality assessment within and across sites, promotes continuous improvement, and empowers stakeholders in locating and delivering high quality care.

Late Diagnosis of Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome in a Peruvian Child

Disorders of sexual differentiation are congenital pathologies characterized by atypical development of genetic, gonadal, or phenotypic sex. These are caused by the alteration of any primordial phases of sexual development and may be evident at birth or in the later stage of life. Here, we present the case of a nine-year-old Peruvian school patient who has female gender assigned at birth, has no contributory antecedents and was found to have clitoromegaly and hypospadia on physical examination. In the blood tests, anti-Müllerian hormone and testosterone were found, and 46 XY karyotype and sex-determining region Y (SRY) genes were present. On abdominal ultrasound, testicles were found in the inguinal canals. The human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) stimulation test was conducted, which allowed us to rule out defects in testosterone biosynthesis and enzyme defects in dihydrotestosterone production; the main suspected diagnosis was partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS). A multidisciplinary medical meeting was held, accepting the patient’s desire to opt for the male gender, after acceptance by the parents. Thus, the patient underwent bilateral orchidopexy and genitoplasty. He is currently receiving therapy with testosterone, with an adequate response to the treatment and the molecular study confirmed the androgen-receptor gene mutation. In conclusion, we highlight the importance of a timely multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of disorders of sexual differentiation to avoid premature gender assignment and major social and family repercussions that it implies.

Sex Assignment and Diagnostics in Infants with Ambiguous Genitalia - A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Ambiguous genitalia affect 1 in 5,000 live births. Diagnostic procedures can be time-consuming, and often the etiology cannot be established in this group of individuals with differences/disorders of sex development (DSD). We aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, sex assignment, and diagnostic workup in these patients. In this retrospective observational study, we included infants who presented with ambiguous genitalia from 2006 to 2016 at the Radboudumc (Radboud University Medical Center) DSD expert center. Relevant data were collected from patient records. Sixty-two 46,XY and fourteen 46,XX individuals were included. Sex was assigned in the first days of life and based on the combination of presence or absence of a uterus on ultrasound, AMH level, palpable gonads, and the karyotype (corresponded in 96% of the patients). In 86% of the 46,XX DSD subjects, a diagnosis was made, whereas in only 15/62 (24%) of the 46,XY DSD individuals, etiology was determined. In 52 individuals, genetic testing was performed resulting in a diagnosis in 24 patients (46%). AMH, hCG-stimulated testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone levels contributed to determining etiology, whilst basal testosterone and basal dihydrotestosterone did not. Establishing a diagnosis in infants with ambiguous genitalia is complex and challenging; this study aids to enhance this process and improve current practice.

The Nomogram of Penile Length and Circumference in Iranian Term and Preterm Neonates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The normal length of penis in preterm and term neonates is different among different nations, and is affected by various factors. The present study aimed to determine stretched penile length (SPL) values and cutoff level of micropenis in term and preterm Iranian neonates, for the first time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All male neonates born in two general hospitals of Tehran (Akbarabadi, and Rasoul hospitals), center of Iran, with gestational age of 28-42 weeks were included and their SPL and penile circumference (PC) were examined on the first 3 days after birth by the same physician. Birth weight (BW), and height, gestational age, type of delivery, mother's age, twin/multiple pregnancy, drug, and medical history of mother during pregnancy were recorded and cutoff levels of two variables were calculated based on the collected variables for different gestational ages.

RESULTS

Among a total of 587 neonates, 203 neonates were born term and 384 preterm. Mean ± SD of neonates' BW were 2,682.51 ± 739.30 (850-4800) gr. Mean ± SD of their SPL was 22.48 ± 3.34 mm; 25.92 ± 1.54 mm in term and 20.66 ± 2.50 mm in preterm infants (P = 0.001). Mean ± SD of PC was 6.71 ± 1.31 mm; 8.14 ± 0.48 in term and 5.96 ± 0.92 in preterm infants (P = 0.001). SPL and PC were significantly correlated with type of delivery, number of parity, gestational age, BW, and crown-heel length, head circumference (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that SPL in male neonates was 22.48 mm and PC was 6.71 mm, both correlated with gestational age and BW. Due to the ethnical variety of this cutoff points and lack of an appropriate study in Iran, these cutoff points can be used by all physicians as a reference for Iranian newborns (term and preterm), in order to prevent misdiagnosis of micropenis and genital disorders.

Disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs) for primary care: the approach to the infant with ambiguous genitalia

The initial management of the neonate with ambiguous genitalia can be a very stressful and anxious time for families, as well as for the general practitioner or neonatologist. A timely approach must be sensitive and attend to the psychosocial needs of the family. In addition, it must also effectively address the diagnostic dilemma that is frequently seen in the care of patients with disorders of sex development (DSDs). One great challenge is assigning a sex of rearing, which must take into account a variety of factors including the clinical, biochemical and radiologic clues as to the etiology of the atypical genitalia (AG). However, other important aspects cannot be overlooked, and these include parental and cultural views, as well as the future outlook in terms of surgery and fertility potential. Achieving optimal outcomes requires open and transparent dialogue with the family and caregivers, and should harness the resources of a multidisciplinary team. The multiple facets of this approach are outlined in this review.

Unexpected ethical dilemmas in sex assignment in 46,XY DSD due to 5-alpha reductase type 2 deficiency

Sex assignment at birth remains one of the most clinically challenging and controversial topics in 46,XY disorders of sexual development (DSD). This is particularly challenging in deficiency of 5-alpha reductase type 2 given that external genitalia are typically undervirilized at birth but typically virilize at puberty to a variable degree. Historically, most individuals with 5-alpha reductase deficiency were raised females. However, reports that over half of patients who underwent a virilizing puberty adopted an adult male gender identity have challenged this practice. Consensus guidelines on assignment of sex of rearing at birth are equivocal or favor male assignment in the most virilized cases. While a male sex of rearing assignment may avoid lifelong hormonal therapy and/or allow the potential for fertility, female sex assignment may be more consistent with external anatomy in the most severely undervirilized cases. Herein, we describe five patients with 46,XY DSD due 5-alpha-reductase type 2 deficiency, all with a severe phenotype. An inter-disciplinary DSD medical team at one of two academic centers evaluated each patient. This case series illustrates the complicated decision-making process of assignment of sex of rearing at birth in 5-alpha reductase type 2 deficiency and the challenges that arise when the interests of the child, parental wishes, recommendations of the medical team, and state law collide.

Behavioural Problems in Children with 46XY Disorders of Sex Development

The aim of this study is to determine the behavioural problems of children with 46XY disorders of sex development (DSD) with genital ambiguity and to identify the risk factors that may influence behaviour. The 27 participants (aged 6-18 years) consisted of 21 patients raised as boys and 6 patients raised as girls. Control data were obtained from a representative sibling of each patient who was matched for age and gender. The study tool used was the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL), which is a parent-administered questionnaire. The analysis of the behavioural scores revealed that the patient group had poorer scores in the total, externalizing, and internalizing realms. This group also had poorer scores in the anxious-depressed, social, and rule-breaking realms as compared to the control group. In addition, the XY-F group had higher scores (more pathological) than the XY-M group, although the difference in the scores was not statistically significant. A comparison of the prevalence of patients with scores in the clinical range with that of the control group was not statistically significant. These findings support the current recommendations that psychological counselling should be an integral part of the professional support offered to patients with DSD.

46,XY disorder of sex development due to 17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency: a plea for timely genetic testing

BACKGROUND

17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 (17βHSD3) deficiency is a rare cause of disorder of sex development (DSD) due to impaired conversion of androstenedione to testosterone. Traditionally, the diagnosis was determined by βHCG-stimulated ratios of testosterone:androstenedione < 0.8.

CASE PRESENTATION

An otherwise phenotypically female infant presented with bilateral inguinal masses and a 46,XY karyotype. βHCG stimulation (1500 IU IM for 2 days) suggested 17βHSD3 deficiency although androstenedione was only minimally stimulated (4.5 nmol/L to 5.4 nmol/L). Expedient genetic testing for the HSD17B3 gene provided the unequivocal diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

We advocate for urgent genetic testing in rare causes of DSD as indeterminate hormone results can delay diagnosis and prolong intervention.

Complexities of gender assignment in 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency: is there a role for early orchiectomy?

Background

17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type-3 (17βHSD-3) deficiency is a rare cause of 46,XY disorders of sex development. The enzyme converts androstenedione to testosterone, necessary for masculinization of male genitalia in utero. 17βHSD-3 deficiency is frequently diagnosed late, at puberty, following virilization, with consequent female-to-male gender reassignment in 39-64%. The decision for sex of rearing is difficult, especially if diagnosed in early childhood. Consensus guidelines are equivocal or support male gender assignment. Long-term outcomes data to guide decisions are also lacking; however, in the few cases of early diagnosis and orchiectomy, female gender retention appears more likely.

We report two patients with 17βHSD-3 deficiency, who presented at unusual ages, in whom female gender was chosen. We performed a focused literature review and summary of gender outcomes in 17βHSD-3 deficiency following early orchiectomy.

Cases

Patient A was a phenotypic female who presented at one year of age with bilateral inguinal hernias and external female genitalia. Testes were identified at surgery. The karyotype was 46,XY. She was initially diagnosed with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome; however, androgen receptor mutation analysis was negative. Human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation yielded a low testosterone: androstenedione ratio (0.6, normal >0.8). Genetic testing demonstrated compound heterozygosity for two known mutations of the HSD17B3 gene. She underwent bilateral orchiectomy at two years of age.

Patient B was born with female genitalia and virilized at 13 years of age. She did not seek evaluation until 22 years of age. Her karyotype was 46,XY. She had bilateral inguinal testes and low testosterone: androstenedione ratio (0.3). HSD17B3 gene sequencing showed her to be a compound heterozygote for two known mutations. She identified herself as female and underwent bilateral orchiectomy and estrogen replacement therapy.

Conclusions

These two patients highlight the complexities of diagnosis and management in 17βHSD-3 deficiency. Although existing data are limited, early orchiectomy is likely to result in retention of female gender identity, avoiding the complications related to virilization in adolescence. As such, it is important to pursue a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical decisions, and to have the support and long term follow up with an inter-disciplinary disorders of sex development team.

Assessing sex assignment concordance with genotype and phenotype

Objectives

To catalogue patients with DSD and to assess the concordance of genotype and phenotype with sex assignment at birth compared to sex assignment before and following assessment by a Gender Medicine Team (GMT) at one institution, as an initial step in formulating standardized guidelines for management of these conditions.

Design

After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was conducted patients seen in the Gender Medicine Clinic (GMC) between 2006–2009 at Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH), Houston, Texas. McNemar’s test and Kappa agreement provided associations of various factors with sex assignment at birth prior to GMT assessment and after GMT assessment.

Participants

Forty-seven patients seen in the GMC with confirmed DSD.

Results

Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients at the time of GMT evaluation was 9.1+/−6.1 years; 61.7% had male karyotype, and 38.3% had female karyotype; 51.1% had a male external phenotype, 42.6% had a female external phenotype, and 6.4% had phenotypic ambiguity. Sex assignment was concordant with genotype and phenotype in 63.8% and 86.4%, respectively of cases at the time of birth and in 76.6% and 97.7%, respectively, of cases after assessment by GMT.

Conclusion

Long-term outcomes are needed to establish standardized practice guidelines for decision-making.

Challenges of disorders of sex development: diverse perceptions across stakeholders

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex development is atypical. Optimal management is patient- and family-centered and delivered by interdisciplinary teams. The present pilot study elicits concerns held by important stakeholders on issues affecting young patients with DSD and their families.

METHODS

Content from focus groups with expert clinicians (pediatric urologists (n = 7), pediatric endocrinologists (n = 10), mental health professionals (n = 4), DSD patient advocates (n = 4), and interviews with parents of DSD-affected children (newborn to 6 years; n = 11) was coded and content-analyzed to identify health-related quality of life issues.

RESULTS

Key stressors varied across stakeholder groups. In general, family-centered issues were noted more than child-centered. In the child-centered domain, providers worried more about physical functioning; family and advocates emphasized gender concerns and body image. In the family-centered domain, parental concerns about medication management outweighed those of providers. Advocates reported more stressors regarding communication/information than other stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

Variability exists across stakeholder groups in the key concerns affecting young children/families with DSD. Interdisciplinary DSD healthcare team development should account for varying perspectives when counseling families and planning treatment.