Combination of conservative and interventional therapy strategies for intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma: a retrospective survival analysis

Multimodal treatment with endoscopic ablation and systemic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are primary malignancies of biliary system and usually unresectable at the time of diagnosis. As a consequence, majority of these cases are candidates for palliative care. With the advances in chemotherapeutic agents and multidisciplinary care, the survival rate has improved in cases with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction. As a consequence, there is a need to provide effective and durable palliative care in these patients. The main role of endoscopic palliation in the vast majority of CCA includes biliary stenting for obstructive jaundice. Recent advances in the endoscopic palliation and multimodal approach appear promising in imparting durable relief of symptoms. Use of radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and intraluminal brachytherapy has been shown to improve the survival rates as well as the patency of biliary stents. Infact, intraductal ablation may act synergistically with chemotherapy by modulating tumour signalling pathways and immune microenvironment.

Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy

Background and aims

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) remains a malignancy with a dismal prognosis. The first-line standard of care includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) and biliary drainage through stenting. Endobiliary ablative techniques, such as photodynamic therapy (ePDT) and radio-frequency ablation (eRFA), have demonstrated feasibility and favorable survival data. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcome in patients treated with SC and concomitant eRFA or ePDT.

Method

All patients with eCCA were evaluated for study inclusion. Sixty-three patients receiving a combination of SC and at least one endobiliary treatment were retrospectively compared.

Results

Patients were stratified into three groups: SC + ePDT (n = 22), SC + eRFA (n = 28), and SC + ePDT + eRFA (n = 13). The median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 14.2 months with no statistically significant difference between the three therapy groups but a trend to better survival for the group receiving ePDT as well as eRFA, during SC (ePDT + SC, 12.7 months; eRFA + SC, 13.8 months; ePDT + eRFA + SC, 20.2 months; p = 0.112). The multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analysis highlighted the beneficial effect of eRFA on OS. Overall, combined therapy was well tolerated. Only cholangitis occurred more often in the SC + eRFA group.

Conclusion

Additional endobiliary ablative therapies in combination with SC were feasible. Both modalities, eRFA and ePDT, showed a similar benefit in terms of survival. Interestingly, patients receiving both regimes showed the best OS indicating a possible synergism between both ablative therapeutic techniques.

American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Although uncommon, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) is a deadly malignancy, and the treatment approaches remain controversial. While surgery remains the only cure, few patients are candidates for resection up front, and there are high rates of both local and distant failure following resection. Herein, we systematically review the available evidence regarding treatment approaches for patients with EHCC, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) framework. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined for specific clinical scenarios encountered by providers in the clinic to guide the management of these patients.

Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Gemcitabine-Resistant Cholangiocarcinoma in vitro and in vivo Through KLF10 and EGFR

Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively rare neoplasm with increasing incidence. Although chemotherapeutic agent such as gemcitabine has long been used as standard treatment for cholangiocarcinoma, the interindividual variability in target and drug sensitivity and specificity may lead to therapeutic resistance. In the present study, we found that photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment inhibited gemcitabine-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cells via repressing cell viability, enhancing cell apoptosis, and eliciting G1 cell cycle arrest through modulating Cyclin D1 and caspase 3 cleavage. In vivo, PDT treatment significantly inhibited the growth of gemcitabine-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cell-derived tumors. Online data mining and experimental analyses indicate that KLF10 expression was induced, whereas EGFR expression was downregulated by PDT treatment; KLF10 targeted the EGFR promoter region to inhibit EGFR transcription. Under PDT treatment, EGFR overexpression and KLF10 silencing attenuated the anti-cancer effects of PDT on gemcitabine-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cells by promoting cell viability, inhibiting apoptosis, and increasing S phase cell proportion. Importantly, under PDT treatment, the effects of KLF10 silencing were significantly reversed by EGFR silencing. In conclusion, PDT treatment induces KLF10 expression and downregulates EGFR expression. KLF10 binds to EGFR promoter region to inhibit EGFR transcription. The KLF10/EGFR axis participates in the process of the inhibition of PDT on gemcitabine-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cells.

The Addition of Transarterial Chemoembolization to Palliative Chemotherapy Extends Survival in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Incidence and mortality of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) have been increasing continuously. Recent studies suggest that the combination of palliative chemotherapy (pCTX) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) improves overall survival (OS). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with TACE and pCTX in unresectable iCCA at our tertiary care center. A group of 14 patients was treated with both pCTX and TACE. The non-randomized control group of 59 patients received pCTX alone. Patients received a median of two pCTX lines in both groups. Those treated with TACE underwent a median number of 3.5 sessions. Median OS from the time of unresectability was 26.2 months in the pCTX + TACE group versus 13.1 months in the pCTX group (p = 0.008). Controlling for albumin, bilirubin, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status, and UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stage, the addition of TACE still conferred an OS benefit of 12.95 months (p = 0.014). A propensity score matching analysis yielded an OS benefit of 14 months from the time of unresectability for the pCTX + TACE group (p = 0.020). The addition of TACE to pCTX may provide an OS benefit for patients with unresectable iCCA. Thus, patients with liver-dominant iCCA undergoing standard-of-care pCTX should be considered for additional treatment with TACE.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Current status of endoscopic approach and additional therapies

The prognosis of patients with advanced or unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is poor. More than 50% of patients with jaundice are inoperable at the time of first diagnosis. Endoscopic treatment in patients with obstructive jaundice ensures bile duct drainage in preoperative or palliative settings. Relief of symptoms (pain, pruritus, jaundice) and improvement in quality of life are the aims of palliative therapy. Stent implantation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is generally preferred for long-term palliation. There is a vast variety of plastic and metal stents, covered or uncovered. The stent choice depends on the expected length of survival, quality of life, costs and physician expertise. This review will provide the framework for the endoscopic minimally invasive therapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, additional therapies, such as brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy by the endoscopic approach, are the nonsurgical methods associated with survival improvement rate and/or local symptom palliation.

Nonsurgical Approaches to Treat Biliary Tract and Liver Tumors

Endoscopic and percutaneous therapies have been shown to prolong life and reduce morbidity for patients with unresectable advanced stages of primary hepatobiliary malignancies. This article reviews pertinent studies published within the last 5 years that involve locoregional techniques to manage hepatocellular carcinoma, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. A major emphasis is placed on photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, irreversible electroporation, and microwave ablation. Technical advances, combinational therapies, and postintervention outcomes are discussed. Despite widespread application, high-quality evidence does not show superiority of any particular locoregional technique for treating advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

Combined photodynamic therapy with systemic chemotherapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the current standard for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Local photodynamic therapy has also demonstrated benefit in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

AIM

To evaluate the benefit of photodynamic therapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy in advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Three hundred and fifty-three patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma between 2004 and 2016 were treated at the University Hospital of Bonn, Germany. Of these, 96 suffering from unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included. Patients were stratified according to treatment: combination photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy (36 patients), photodynamic therapy alone (34 patients), and chemotherapy alone (26 patients).

RESULTS

Combined photodynamic therapy with chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone (P = 0.022). Median survival was 20 months in the combination group (95% CI: 16.38-23.62), 15 months in the photodynamic alone group (95% CI: 10.02-19.98) and 10 months in the chemotherapy alone group (95% CI: 8.45-11.55). In multivariate analysis, combination therapy and photodynamic therapy alone (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, P = 0.006), metal stenting, and radiofrequency ablation were independent predictors of longer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in significantly longer survival than chemotherapy alone. Application of photodynamic therapy significantly correlated with longer survival, demonstrating benefit in advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Thus, photodynamic therapy should be considered during therapeutic decision making in advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma

Background/Aims

Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol.

Results

More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups.

Conclusions

Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC.

Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation Followed by Locoregional Tumor Treatments for Treating Occluded Biliary Stents in Non-Resectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Single-Institution Experience

Objectives

To determine the safety and feasibility of intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) followed by locoregional tumor treatments in patients with non-resectable malignant biliary obstruction and stent re-occlusion.

Methods

Fourteen patients with malignant biliary obstruction and blocked metal stents were studied retrospectively. All had intraductal RFA followed by locoregional tumor treatments and were monitored clinically and radiologically. The practicality, safety, postoperative complications, jaundice remission, stent patency and survival time were analyzed.

Results

Combination treatment was successful for all patients. There were no severe complications during RFA or local treatments. All patients had stent patency restored, with a decline in serum bilirubin. Three patients had recurrent jaundice by 195, 237 and 357 days; two patients underwent repeat intraductal RFA; and one required an internal-external biliary drain. The average stent patency time was 234 days (range 187-544 days). With a median follow-up of 384 days (range 187-544 days), six patients were alive, while eight had died. There was no mortality at 30 days. The 3, 6, 12 and 18 month survival rates were 100%, 100%, 64.3% and 42.9%, respectively.

Conclusion

Intraductal RFA followed by locoregional tumor treatments for occluded metal stents is safe and practically feasible and potential increase stent patency and survival times.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with local-regional therapy: quantitative volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient maps for assessment of tumor response

PURPOSE

To evaluate volumetric changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and contrast material enhancement on contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance (MR) images in hepatic arterial and portal venous phases for assessing early response in cholangiocarcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, including 11 men (mean age, 60 years; standard deviation, 16.8) and 18 women (mean age, 63 years; standard deviation, 11.5) were included in this retrospective institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study; informed consent was waived. Sixty-nine TACE procedures were performed during the observational time (range, one to five TACE sessions). No patients received another form of therapy after treatment with TACE. MR Imaging was performed before and 3-4 weeks after TACE, and images were analyzed with a semiautomatic volumetric software package. Patients were stratified as responders and nonresponders on the basis of overall survival (OS) as the primary end point. Differences between responders and nonresponders were analyzed with paired t tests, and OS was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Significant differences were analyzed with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Mean volumetric ADC increased from 1.54×10(-3) mm2/sec to 1.92×10(-3) mm2/sec (P<.0001), with no significant decrease in mean volumetric enhancement in hepatic arterial (40.6% vs 37.5%, P=.546) and portal venous (79.0% vs 70.0%, P=.105) phases. Patients who demonstrated improved survival of 10 months or more had a significant increase in mean volumetric ADC and volumetric ADC above the threshold level of 1.60×10(-3) mm2/sec (P<.002). Patients with 45% or greater (n=21; log-rank test, P<.02) and 60% or greater (n=12; log-rank test, P<.009) ADC changes for the whole tumor volume demonstrated better OS compared with patients in whom these ADC changes were not achieved.

CONCLUSION

Patients with percentage tumor volume increase in ADC of 45% or greater and 60% or greater above the threshold level of 1.60×10(-3) mm2/sec had favorable response to therapy and improved survival.