Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies

A 1-year review of anti-Ro/La autoantibody testing in an obstetric population

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate current anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibody ordering patterns, clinical indications for performing these tests, and potential cost-benefit analysis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent autoantibody testing over 1 year were included. Necessary information was obtained from patient electronic records.

RESULTS

In total 47 patients underwent anti-Ro/La autoantibody testing. Of those tested, 11/47 (2%) had positive results and testing was clinically indicated in 26/47 (55%) patients, indicating minimal cost-benefits. The total rate of the cost prescription was €1644.96. The mean time to process tests was 5 days. In those with positive autoantibodies, two infants were diagnosed with congenital heart block and had pacemakers inserted after delivery.

CONCLUSION

This study found anti-Ro/La autoantibody tests were appropriately ordered in accordance with clinical guidelines. By identifying patients who were autoantibody negative, economic benefits were gained, in terms of antenatal management including reduced frequency of antenatal visits and fetal heart surveillance.

Should We Adopt Increased Dilutions for Indirect Immunofluorescence in Pediatric Anti-Centromere Antibody Testing? Insights from a Three-Year Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) pose diagnostic challenges, particularly in pediatric populations, due to their diverse presentations and overlapping symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic concordance between indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) at different dilution levels (1/80 and 1/640) and immunoblot findings for anti-centromere antibody (ACA) positivity. Additionally, the clinical significance of ACA positivity and its association with SARDs in pediatric patients was assessed.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 58 pediatric patients evaluated for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing at Ege University Hospital from 2019 to 2021. IIF was performed using HEp-20-10 cells and immunoblot testing was conducted to assess CENP-B reactivity. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, correspondence analysis, and regression modeling to explore the relationship between IIF titers, immunoblot findings, and SARD diagnoses.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 62.1% were diagnosed with SARD. Higher IIF titers (≥1/640) were strongly associated with CENP-B 3+ immunoblot positivity, while lower titers (1/80 and 1/320) correlated with CENP-B 1+. Patients with IIF positivity at 1/80 were 15.89 times more likely to have SARD (p < 0.001). Correspondence analysis revealed significant associations between IIF dilution levels and immunoblot reactivity (χ2 = 37.574, p < 0.000). Gender and age were not significant predictors of SARD positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the diagnostic value of higher IIF dilution levels (≥1/640) in improving ACA detection and SARD diagnosis in pediatric patients. Incorporating complementary diagnostic tools, such as immunoblot testing, can enhance diagnostic accuracy. These findings support adopting higher IIF cutoff levels in clinical practice for pediatric populations.

Mitigating overuse of antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing through educational intervention: a study in internal medicine and neurology departments

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Overuse of antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests leads to increased costs, false positives, and unnecessary treatments. This study evaluated ANA overuse in internal medicine and neurology departments and assessed the impact of an educational intervention.

METHOD

This quality improvement educational intervention study examined ANA test overuse in five internal medicine departments and one neurology department at a university-affiliated medical center. The educational intervention included a session focusing on ANA testing appropriateness. Outcome measures comprised the ANA/new patient ratio (APR) and the percentage of positive ANA test results. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-intervention periods (both 6 months).

RESULTS

The intervention took place in December 2021. The APR decreased from 43% in the pre-educational intervention period to 27% in the post-intervention period in the neurology department (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, confidence interval [95% CI] 0.37-0.63, P < 0.0001) and from 2.6% to 2.2% in the internal medicine departments (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73-1.10, P = 0.28). The percentage of positive ANA tests increased from 43% pre-intervention to 53% in the post-intervention period (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.90-2.46, P = 0.12) in the neurology department and from 48% to 59% (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.99-2.44, P = 0.0543) in the internal medicine departments.

CONCLUSION

A simple educational intervention reduced unnecessary ANA testing in the neurology department but not in internal medicine departments, improving patient selection and potential cost savings. The results underscore the importance of targeted education to promote evidence-based behavior among healthcare professionals. Further research with longer follow-up is needed to assess the sustainability of these improvements.

Antinuclear antibodies do not affect euploidy rate in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do antinuclear antibodies affect the blastocyst aneuploidy rate during preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles?

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of 259 patients who underwent PGT-A and immunological screening at the study centre between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients were divided into an antinuclear-antibody-negative group (213 cycles) and an antinuclear-antibody-positive group (46 cycles) based on the presence/absence of antinuclear antibodies, and embryo outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between antinuclear-antibody-negative and antinuclear-antibody-positive patients in terms of paternal age (34 versus 37 years; P = 0.032), maternal age (33 versus 35 years; P = 0.046) and duration of infertility (2 versus 3 years; P = 0.009). No significant differences were found in the number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, available embryos, high-quality embryos, blastocysts biopsied, euploid blastocysts, MII oocyte rate, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate and euploidy rate. Multiple linear regression revealed that, in infertile couples who underwent PGT-A, maternal age was an independent factor influencing the euploidy rate (regression coefficient -0.009), whereas the presence of antinuclear antibodies was not an independent factor influencing the euploidy rate.

CONCLUSION

In couples who underwent PGT-A, the presence of antinuclear antibodies did not affect the euploidy rate. This study did not observe any negative effects of antinuclear antibodies on oocyte or embryo outcomes.

Biomarkers reflecting the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and guide therapeutic approach in systemic sclerosis: a narrative review

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a progressive autoimmune disorder that mainly affects the skin. There are other clinical manifestations as renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal tract involvements. Based on the skin involvement there are two subtypes of SSc, as limited cutaneous SSc (lSSc) which involves the acral part of the body and diffuse cutaneous SSc (dSSc) resulting in significant skin thickening of the body. Despite of the extensive research the pathomechanism is not fully clarified, how Ssc develops, moreover identifying biomarkers to predict the clinical outcome and prognosis still remains challenging. Circulating biomarkers can be crucial to define the diagnosis, to predict the prognosis and monitor the clinical course. However, only some patients are responsive to the therapy in SSc, and there is a need to reach the ideal therapy for any individual to prevent or slow down the progression in early stages of the disease. In this narrative review, our purpose was to summarize the potential biomarkers in Ssc, describe their role in the diagnosis, pathomechanism, clinical course, organ manifestations, as well as the response to the therapy. Biomarkers assessment aids in the evaluation of disease progression, and disease outcome.

Reflecting on a decade of the international consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP): Accomplishments and challenges from the perspective of the 7th ICAP workshop

The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) is an ongoing international initiative dedicated to harmonizing technical and interpretation aspects of the HEp-2 IFA test. Comprised of internationally recognized experts in autoimmunity and HEp-2 IFA testing, ICAP has operated for the last 10 years by promoting accurate reading, interpretation, and reporting of HEp-2 IFA images by professionals involved in various areas related to autoimmune diseases, such as clinical diagnostic laboratories, academic research, IVD industry, and patient care. ICAP operates through continuous information exchange with the international community and encourages the participation of younger experts from all over the world. The 7th ICAP workshop has addressed several aspects that originated from this interaction with the international community and has effectively established objective goals and tasks to be delivered over the next two years. Some of these are outlined in this article, including the planning of three audio-visual educational modules to be posted at the www.anapattern.org website, the classification of two novel HEp-2 IFA patterns, the implementation of a project dedicated to continuously updating the information on the clinical and immunologic relevance of the HEp-2 IFA patterns, and the launch of two additional branches of the HEp-2 Clinical and Immunological (HEp-2 CIC) project.

Autoantibodies in COVID-19 and Other Viral Diseases: Molecular, Cellular, and Clinical Perspectives

Autoantibodies are immune system-produced antibodies that wrongly target the body's cells and tissues for attack. The COVID-19 pandemic has made it possible to link autoantibodies to both the severity of pathogenic infection and the emergence of several autoimmune diseases after recovery from the infection. An overview of autoimmune disorders and the function of autoantibodies in COVID-19 and other infectious diseases are discussed in this review article. We also investigated the different categories of autoantibodies found in COVID-19 and other infectious diseases including the potential pathways by which they contribute to the severity of the illness. Additionally, it also highlights the probable connection between vaccine-induced autoantibodies and their adverse outcomes. The review also discusses the therapeutic perspectives of autoantibodies. This paper advances our knowledge about the intricate interaction between autoantibodies and COVID-19 by thoroughly assessing the most recent findings.

Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibody testing by indirect immunofluorescence or solid-phase assays in a Spanish population: the Camargo Cohort

Autoantibodies are the hallmark of autoimmunity, and specifically, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are one of the most relevant antibodies present in systemic autoimmune diseases (AID). In the present study, we evaluate the relationship between ANA and sociodemographic and biobehavioral factors in a population with a low pre-test probability for systemic AID. ANA were determined in serum samples at baseline visit from 2997 participants from the Camargo Cohort using indirect immunofluorescence assay, and two solid phase assays (SPA), addressable laser bead immunoassay, and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay. Sociodemographic and biobehavioral features of the subjects were obtained at baseline visit using a structured questionnaire. The prevalence of ANA positive results was significantly higher when indirect immunofluorescence assay was used as screening method in comparison with SPAs, being higher in females, older subjects, and those with higher C-reactive protein levels. Considering biobehavioral features, the prevalence was higher in those individuals with a sedentary lifestyle, and in ex- and non-alcohol users. Moreover, considering the relevance of the antibody load using ANA Screen, the prevalence of the antibody load also increased with age, especially in females. In conclusion, the prevalence of ANA varies depending on sociodemographic and biobehavioral features of the subjects, which could be relevant specifically in a population with a low pre-test probability for systemic AIDs.

Harmonization of ANA testing challenge: quantification strategy to accurately predict end-point titers avoiding serial dilution

Despite the advantages of automated systems for antinuclear antibody (ANA) analysis, the prediction of end-point titers avoiding serial dilutions is still in progress. The aims of this study were to set a conversion table providing discriminant ranges of fluorescence signal intensity values (FI) corresponding to the end-point titers and validate this tool in a real-life laboratory setting. Eight hundred ninety-four serum samples were analyzed for ANA using Image Navigator System. In order to classify FI into non-overlapping groups corresponding to conventional end-point titers, statistical discriminant analysis was used. Validation study was performed calculating agreement and error rates between visual readings and conversion table of 1119 routine ANA positive samples. Setting of FI ranges corresponding to the end-point titers for different staining patterns was computed. For samples showing single pattern, the overall agreement between visual readings and conversion table was 98.4% for all titers ranging from 1:160 to 1:2560, of which 68.0% had the same titer and 30.4% were within ± one titer difference. Concordance rates according to ANA patterns were as follows: (1) nuclear 98.4%, of which 67.0% had the same titer and 31.4% ± one titer; (2) cytoplasmic 100%, of which 72.7% had the same titer and 27.3% than ± one titer; (3) mitotic 66.6%, of which 33.3% had more ± one titer. Our study developed a quantification method for autoantibodies titers assessment based on just one single sample dilution instead of traditional serial dilution approach, providing significant advantages in routine laboratory in terms of reduction in hand-on time and harmonization of results.

Recognition of rare antinuclear antibody patterns based on a novel attention-based enhancement framework

Rare antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern recognition has been a widely applied technology for routine ANA screening in clinical laboratories. In recent years, the application of deep learning methods in recognizing ANA patterns has witnessed remarkable advancements. However, the majority of studies in this field have primarily focused on the classification of the most common ANA patterns, while another subset has concentrated on the detection of mitotic metaphase cells. To date, no prior research has been specifically dedicated to the identification of rare ANA patterns. In the present paper, we introduce a novel attention-based enhancement framework, which was designed for the recognition of rare ANA patterns in ANA-indirect immunofluorescence images. More specifically, we selected the algorithm with the best performance as our target detection network by conducting comparative experiments. We then further developed and enhanced the chosen algorithm through a series of optimizations. Then, attention mechanism was introduced to facilitate neural networks in expediting the learning process, extracting more essential and distinctive features for the target features that belong to the specific patterns. The proposed approach has helped to obtained high precision rate of 86.40%, 82.75% recall, 84.24% F1 score and 84.64% mean average precision for a 9-category rare ANA pattern detection task on our dataset. Finally, we evaluated the potential of the model as medical technologist assistant and observed that the technologist's performance improved after referring to the results of the model prediction. These promising results highlighted its potential as an efficient and reliable tool to assist medical technologists in their clinical practice.

A Retrospective Study on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients and Its Correlation With Serological Markers

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease. Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) aids in the diagnosis of SLE. The indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay is often used a routine screening test for the detection of ANA. The pathogenic role and significance of various patterns produced in IIF is yet to be explored.

AIM

This study aimed to detect ANA patterns generated by IIF and correlate these patterns with specific antibodies detected by line immunoassay. We also investigated the significance of each ANA pattern and its association with specific serological SLE markers, such as complement molecules, anti-dsDNA, antiphospholipid antibody, and C-reactive protein (CRP), along with associations with direct Coombs test (DCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that included 204 patients newly diagnosed with SLE according to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria. The detection and pattern determination of ANA was performed by IIF using HEp-20-10. Furthermore, line immunoassay was performed, and the antibody profile of each sample was obtained. Other immunodiagnostic markers were analyzed, including C3, C4, anti-dsDNA, antiphospholipid antibodies (anti-cardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I, and lupus anticoagulant), CRP, and DCT.

RESULTS

Of the 204 samples, the most frequent ANA pattern observed was nucleus speckled (52.9%), followed by nucleus homogenous (27.5%), mixed (13.7%), and cytoplasm speckled (5.9%). The nucleus homogenous pattern showed the most pathogenic immune profile due to its close association with markers of disease activity, namely, high anti-dsDNA titer, low C3 level, and DCT positivity.  Conclusion: This study showed that the most common pattern associated with SLE is nucleus speckled, followed by the nucleus homogenous pattern. Based on associations with specific serological markers, the nucleus homogenous pattern may be linked to a high disease activity in SLE.

Extended autoantibody panel in Turkish patients with early-stage systemic sclerosis: Coexpressions and their influences on clinical phenotypes

BACKGROUND/AIM

To investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of an extended autoantibody profile in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, serum from 100 consecutive patients was subjected to indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) (HEp-20-10/primate liver mosaic) and Systemic Sclerosis Profile by EUROIMMUN to evaluate anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and autoantibodies against 13 different autoantibodies in patients with SSc less than 3 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-three of 100 patients were positive for ANA by IIF. Fifty-three patients showed single positivity, 26 anti-topoisomerase antibodies (anti-Scl70 ab), 16 anticentromere antibodies (ACAs), six anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies (anti-RNAPIII ab), one anti-Ku antibody, one anti-PM/Scl100 antibody, two anti-PM/Scl75 antibodies, one anti-Ro52 antibody, whereas 32 patients had multiple autoantibody positivities. Among classic SSc-specific autoantibodies, anti-Scl70 and anti-RNAPIII abs showed the highest cooccurrence (n = 4). One patient was simultaneously positive for anti-RNAPIII ab and ACA, and one was positive for ACA and anti-Scl70 ab. The clinical features were not statistically different between single and multiple autoantibody-positivity for classic SSc-specific autoantibodies (ACA, anti-Scl70 ab, and anti-RNAPIII ab), except for digital ulcer in the multiantibody positive ACA group (p = .019).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, coexpression of autoantibodies is not uncommon in SSc patients. Although autoantibodies specific to SSc in early disease show generally known clinical features, it remains to be investigated how the coexpression of autoantibodies will affect clinical presentation.

Discriminating between Homogeneous (AC-1) and Dense Fine Speckled (AC-2) Antinuclear Antibody Patterns: Re-Evaluation of Immunofluorescence Imaging

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are essential diagnostic markers in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Among the 30 ANA patterns, homogeneous (AC-1) and dense fine speckled (AC-2) should be focused on owing to their somewhat indistinct presentation in immunofluorescence imaging and distinct correlation with clinical conditions. This study aimed to develop a flowchart to guide discrimination between AC-1 and AC-2 patterns and to re-evaluate ANA samples according to this flowchart to verify its detection ability. We re-evaluated immunofluorescence imaging of 62 ANA blood samples simultaneously subjected to solid-phase assays for autoantibodies against dsDNA, nucleosomes, histones, and DFS70. The results showed statistically significant odd ratios (ORs) of detection of anti-DFS70 using AC-2 after re-evaluation of total samples (OR 101.9, 95% CI 11.7-886.4, p-value < 0.001) and subgroup analysis of patients' samples (OR 53.8, 95% CI 5.9-493.6, p-value < 0.001). The OR of anti-nucleosome/histone/dsDNA detection using AC-1 in re-evaluated data increased to 5.43 (95% CI 1.00-29.61, p-value = 0.05). In the analysis of specific autoantibodies, more than half of the samples with an AC-2 pattern (54.2%) had specific autoantibodies other than anti-DFS70. We conclude that the flowchart for discriminating between AC-1 and AC-2 ANA patterns in this study is a viable practical guide for other laboratories when encountering equivocal ANA results.

Autoantibodies in psoriatic disease

Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease affecting over 8 million people in the US and Canada. Approximately, a quarter of psoriasis patients have an inflammatory arthritis termed psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Psoriatic disease encompassing both psoriasis and PsA is regarded as an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, exhibiting both autoimmune and autoinflammatory features. A review of the current literature on the presence and clinical significance of autoantibodies found in psoriatic disease are presented. The frequency of several autoantibodies in psoriasis and PsA patients as well as their clinical significance regarding disease diagnosis, disease activity and treatment response are reviewed. Additionally, the basic principles of antibody assays are presented, and the methods used for each study are analyzed. Despite historically described as a rheumatoid factor negative (seronegative) disease, an array of autoantibodies has been identified in patients with psoriatic disease. This points to an autoimmune component potentially playing a role in psoriatic disease; however, additional evidence is needed to determine the clinical utility of these autoantibodies.

Predictive factors for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease in anti-synthetase syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). Progressive fibrosing ILD (PF-ILD) may develop in ILD with autoimmune features. Data on PF-ILDs in ASS as a group are scarce. This study aimed to explore the characteristics and predictors of PF-ILD in ASS patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 96 ASS-ILD patients. Baseline clinical data were collected. PF-ILD assessments were conducted at every hospital visit during windows of 24 months after initial diagnosis. Phenotypic, survival features and predictors of PF-ILD were estimated through SPSS 22.0.

RESULTS

The results revealed that 35.42% (34/96) were evaluated to be PF-ILD with a median interval time of 14.73 months. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia was the most common radiological pattern of PF-ILD. Ground glass opacity (GGO), traction bronchiectasis and reticulation were representative high-resolution computed tomography findings of this group. Compared with the non-progressive group, PF-ILD patients had higher frequencies of anti-Ro-52 antibodies (91.18% vs 66.13%, P = 0.007) and GGO in the lower + middle and lower + middle + upper zones of the left lung, as well as lower + middle zones in the right lung (85.30% vs 54.84%, P = 0.003; 64.71% vs 38.71%, P = 0.015; 82.35% vs 58.06%, P = 0.016). Multivariate Cox analysis identified that anti-Ro-52 antibody (hazards ratio [HR] 3.55, 95% CI 1.06-11.90, P = 0.040) and GGO in left lower + middle lung zones (HR 22.11, 95% CI 1.95-250.90, P = 0.012) were independent risk factors for PF-ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

PF-ILD was associated with poor prognosis. Over one-third of ASS-ILD patients may develop to PF-ILD. Anti-Ro-52 antibody positivity and GGO in left lower + middle lung zones were independent risk factors for PF-ILD in ASS patients.

Anti-Ki/anti-PA28γ autoantibodies contribute to the HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence nuclear speckled pattern

OBJECTIVES

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are associated with several autoimmune diseases. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on human epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells is the golden standard for ANA detection in the clinic. In case of a positive HEp-2 IIF test result, follow-up tests are done to determine autoantibody specificity. For a fraction of the HEp-2 IIF-positive samples, the nature of the autoantigens remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to characterize autoantigens in such samples.

METHODS

To characterize autoantigens in an unbiased way, we combined protein immunoprecipitation with liquid chromatography (LC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) sequencing.

RESULTS

Using such approach we detected the Ki antigen, also referred to as PA28γ, in the immunoprecipitate of serum samples of three individuals with an autoimmune disease. The HEp-2 nuclear speckled IIF fluorescent signal of all three serum samples was abolished after pre-absorption of the serum with recombinant Ki antigen, confirming that autoantibodies against Ki underlie the HEp-2 IIF signal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that anti-Ki autoantibodies can underlie a nuclear speckled HEp-2 IIF pattern.

Interference of Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) in Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IIFA)-Based Perinuclear Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (pANCA) Interpretation

Background

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) based on antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing is a commonly employed test for diagnosing autoimmune vasculitis. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) can give rise to a false interpretation of perinuclear-ANCA (pANCA) in ethanol-fixed granulocyte substrates. Analytical interference could frequently occur in setups where ethanol-fixed substrates are used alone. Here, we intend to investigate this ANA interference in pANCA interpretation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we studied anti-MPO-negative but ANA-positive and pANCA (IIFA based) samples. We also correlated immunoblot results (where data were available) and checked the association between grades of blot positivity (an indicator of the concentration of ANA) and frequency of pANCA interpretation. Data were analyzed by appropriate statistical techniques (Chi-square and kappa statistics).

Results

About 19.2% of ANA blot (ENA-blot) positive samples displayed a pANCA positive pattern in the ethanol-fixed substrate, while this positivity in ENA-blot negatives was 6.5%. In positive ANA-IIFA samples, about 14.7% yielded pANCA patterns (on ethanol fixed substrates). Out of this, nuclear homogenous pattern yielding samples gave the highest frequency pANCA, that is, in 31.5% followed by speckled (11.1%), DFS (10.3%), and centromere (6.7%).The association of the nuclear homogenous pattern was statistically significant.

Conclusions

ANA-positive results may interfere with the interpretation of pANCA as observed in ANA-IIFA and ENA-blot positive samples. ANA-IIFA patterns like nuclear homogenous may strongly associate this pANCA interpretation. This can help laboratories perform ANCA testing more effectively, ruling out ANA interference in ANCA screening.

Anti-Ro52 Autoantibody Is Common in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Correlating with Worse Outcome when Associated with interstitial lung disease in Systemic Sclerosis and Autoimmune Myositis

This review highlights the 30 plus years research progress since the discovery of autoantibody to Ro52/TRIM21 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's syndrome (SjS). After the initial expression cloning of the Ro52 cDNA, it has taken many years to the current understanding in the interesting biological function of Ro52 as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and its role in innate immune clearance of intracellular IgG-bound complex. Early observations show that anti-Ro52, mostly associated with anti-SS-A/Ro60 and/or anti-SS-B/La, is commonly found in SLE (40-70%), SjS (70-90%), neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLE, 75-90%), and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (50-60%). Anti-Ro52 has long been postulated to play a direct pathogenic role in congenital heart block in NLE as well as in the QT interval prolongation in some adults. The widespread availability of the anti-Ro52 assay has led to the detection of anti-Ro52 in other diseases including autoimmune hepatitis (20-40%), systemic sclerosis (10-30%), and autoimmune myositis (20-40%). More than ten studies have pointed to an association of anti-Ro52 with interstitial lung disease and, more importantly, correlating with poor outcome and worse survival. Other studies are implicating an interesting role for anti-Ro52 in the diagnosis of certain cancers. Future studies are needed to examine the mechanism in the pathogenesis of anti-Ro52 and carefully documenting its causal relationships in different disease conditions.

Detection of Autoantibodies in Saliva as New Avenue for the Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Patients

(1) Background: Autoimmune diseases are characterized by autoantibodies directed to a large number of antigenic targets and are measured using serum as sample matrix. Although serum is a very common specimen type, it comes with certain drawbacks. Most importantly, it depends on venous puncture and requires medical personnel for sampling. This is of particular importance in light of the limited healthcare access of patients with autoimmune diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, alternative sample matrices are being explored for the measurement of autoantibodies. Our study aimed to establish the feasibility of measuring autoantibodies in saliva samples using a novel and highly sensitive method for the detection of autoantibodies. (2) Methods: A total of 48 serum/saliva pairs were collected and tested using a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) system for the presence of a wide range of autoantibodies. (3) Results: A high level of correlation was observed between the results obtained with serum and saliva (Spearman’s rho = 0.725). Study participants clearly preferred saliva over serum sampling as part of the usability assessment. (4) Conclusions: Saliva represents a promising alternative sample matrix for the detection of autoantibodies. The usability study showed a clear preference of saliva over serum as a sample matrix.

The influence of demography and referral medical specialty on the detection of autoantibodies to HEP-2 cells in a large sample of patients

Background

The prevalence of anti-cell autoantibodies detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2-IIFA) increases with age and is higher in female sex. The number of medical specialties that use HEp-2-IIFA in the investigation of autoimmune diseases has increased lately. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and patterns of autoantibodies on HEp-2-IIFA according to demographics variables and referring medical specialties.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the HEp-2-IIFA carried out between January and June of 2017 was performed. The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibodies Patterns (ICAP) and the Brazilian Consensus on Autoantibodies were used for patterns definition on visual reading of the slides. Anti-cell (AC) codes from ICAP and Brazilian AC codes (BAC) were used for patterns classification.

Results

From 54,990 samples referred for HEp-2-IIF testing, 20.9% were positive at titer ≥ 1/80. HEp-2-IIFA positivity in females and males was 24% and 12%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The proportion of positive results in the 4 age groups analyzed: 0–19, 20–39, 40–59, and ≥ 60 years was 23.3, 20.2, 20.1, and 22.8%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Considering all positive sera (n = 11,478), AC-4 nuclear fine speckled (37.7%), AC-2 nuclear dense fine speckled (21.3%), BAC-3 nuclear quasi-homogeneous (10%) and mixed/composite patterns (8.8%) were the most prevalent patterns. The specialties that most requested HEp-2-IIFA were general practitioner (20.1%), dermatology (15%), gynecology (9.9%), rheumatology (8.5%), and cardiology (5.8%). HEp-2-IIFA positivity was higher in patients referred by rheumatologists (35.7% vs. 19.6%) (p < 0.0001). Moderate (46.4%) and high (10.8%) titers were more observed in patients referred by rheumatologists (p < 0.0001). We observed a high proportion of mixed and cytoplasmic patterns in samples referred by oncologists and a high proportion of BAC-3 (nuclear quasi-homogeneous) pattern in samples referred by pneumologists.

Conclusions

One-fifth of the patients studied were HEp-2-IIFA-positive. The age groups with more positive results were 0–19 and ≥ 60 years. AC-4, AC-2, BAC-3 and mixed/composite patterns were the most frequent patterns observed. Rheumatologists requested only 8.5% of HEp-2-IIFA. Positive results and moderate to high titers of autoantibodies were more frequent in patients referred by rheumatologists.

Pediatric Antinuclear Antibody Negative Full-House Nephropathy: A Clinical Conundrum

Introduction: Lupus nephritis is common in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The presence of full-house immunoglobulin deposits is a unique feature for histopathological diagnosis in lupus nephritis. Our case report highlights two cases with antinuclear antibody (ANA) negative full-house nephropathy (FHN), their clinical phenotypes and intermediate long-term renal outcome. A review of the pediatric literature on this clinical entity ensued. Case Presentation: Two girls, aged three and nine years old presented with acute onset of kidney impairment. One needed temporary dialysis support. Both showed hypocomplementemia and biopsies concurred with FHN. Notably, ANA was absent in both patients. They achieved complete remission soon after introducing immunosuppressive therapy and the disease remained quiescent for many years thereafter. ANA remained negative during surveillance. Conclusions: There have been reports on a possible incomplete form when the characteristic of FHN is seen in isolation. Although natural history of this entity remains uncertain, most literature reports apparent long-term remission following the initial episode. ANA positivity, as an obligatory criterion of diagnosing lupus nephritis (LN), recommended in the new EULAR/ACR 2019 guideline, may raise many uncertainties for this group of patients. There is a need to elucidate whether this should continue to be perceived as part of a lupus continuum or it may be considered a unique clinical entity? Such uncertainties possibly subject the child and his/her caregivers to perpetual mental stress.

An indirect comparison of automated indirect immunofluorescence vs automated solid-phase immunoassays for antinuclear antibody detection: A meta-analysis and adjusted indirect comparison of diagnostic test accuracy

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated indirect immunofluorescence (automated-IIF) and fully automated solid-phase immunoassays (solid-phase assays), compared with gold standard conventional manual indirect immunofluorescence (manual-IIF) for antinuclear antibody (ANA) detection.

METHODS

Indirect meta-comparison was performed using prospective studies reporting comparative data between automated-IIF and fully automated solid-phase assays individually to conventional manual-IIF. Diagnostic tests regarding different automated solid-phase assays and automated-IIF for ANA detection were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG electronic databases from their inception to January 2022. Assessment of the quality of the studies was undertaken using a second version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The investigated diagnostic indices including pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), pooled negative likelihood ratio (NLR), pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of automated-IIF and solid-phase assays, respectively. Relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOR) was calculated to indirectly compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated-IIF and solid-phase assays. To visualize results, we provide forest plots showing the RDOR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the 2 methods against the "gold standard" manual-IIF by R software. Deeks' funnel was used to investigate the publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 6111 subjects were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled PLR, pooled NLR, pooled DOR and the AUC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.86), 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.84), 14.22 (95% CI 8.55-23.65), 0.06 (95% CI 0.03-0.12), 287.0 (95% CI 124.30-662.68) and 0.983 for automated-IIF respectively, and as for solid-phase assays those were 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.75), 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), 5.66 (95% CI 3.33-9.62), 0.30 (95% CI 0.20-0.47), 19.14 (95% CI 8.00-45.79) and 0.894. The results of indirect comparison indicated that automated-IIF had statistically significant higher accuracy for the detection of ANA.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis and indirect comparison suggest that automated-IIF should be recommended as an alternative assay for ANA screening under the condition of increased demand for ANA testing in clinical immunology laboratories.

Advances in SLE classification criteria

This year, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1982 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) celebrate their 40th anniversary. From this start, the quest for optimal SLE criteria has led to the 1997 ACR update, the 2012 publication of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria, and, in 2019, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR classification criteria. The latter have since been externally validated in more than two dozen studies and have become the gold standard inclusion criterion of SLE clinical trials. This comprehensive review attempts to follow the evolving success story of SLE classification, highlighting relevant decisions and their rationale, and discussing consequences for the way SLE is defined and managed.

Analytical and clinical performance of different platforms simultaneously detecting 15 antinuclear antibodies

Background

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are invaluable biomarkers for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases (AIDs). This study aims to compare the performances of line immunoassay (LIA), multiplex bead‐based flow fluorescent immunoassay (MBFFI), and magnetic bar code immunofluorescence assay (MBC‐IF) to detect ANA‐Profile‐15S.

Methods

In total, 184 samples from AID patients and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were collected. Fifteen ANAs (anti‐dsDNA, nucleosome, histone, Sm, PCNA, ribosomal‐P, SS‐A/Ro52, SS‐A/Ro60, SS‐B/La, centromere B [CENP‐B], Scl‐70, U1‐snRNP, AMA‐M2, Jo‐1, and Pm/Scl) were subjected to parallel detection by the LIA, MBFFI, and MBC‐IF. The consistency between assays was analyzed. The discrepant results were further examined by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA).

Results

Anti‐SS‐A/Ro52 and SS‐A/Ro60 autoantibodies were the most common autoantibodies in ANA positive‐profiles, and were detected with equal efficiency by the LIA, MBFFI, and MBC‐IF (p = 0.101 and p = 0.732, respectively). The three assays showed excellent agreement (consistency range: 66.5%–97.5%), and total consistency was 85.8%. The MBFFI and MBC‐IF assays were in good agreement in terms of ANA‐Profile‐15S determination; the kappa coefficient ranged from 0.59 to 0.95, except for the PCNA and PM‐Scl. Of the 262 re‐assessed divergent results, 124 (47.33%) were positive on CLIA; the various autoantibodies exhibited variable patterns. More importantly, the ANA‐Profile‐15S results of the MBFFI and MBC‐IF accurately identified patients with AID; the area under the curves ranged from 0.642 to 0.919.

Conclusions

The novel MBFFI and MBC‐IF assay performed well in detecting ANA‐Profile‐15S. The application of MBFFI and MBC‐IF play important roles in laboratory diagnosis of AIDs.

The Past, Present, and Future in Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA)

Autoantibodies are a hallmark of autoimmunity and, specifically, antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are the most relevant autoantibodies present in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Over the years, different methods from LE cell to HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), solid-phase assays (SPAs), and finally multianalyte technologies have been developed to study ANA-associated SARDs. All of them provide complementary information that is important to provide the most clinically valuable information. The identification of new biomarkers together with multianalyte platforms will help close the so-called "seronegative gap" and to correctly classify and diagnose patients with SARDs. Finally, artificial intelligence and machine learning is an area still to be exploited but in a next future will help to extract patterns within patient data, and exploit these patterns to predict patient outcomes for improved clinical management.

Rational development and application of biomarkers in the field of autoimmunity: A conceptual framework guiding clinicians and researchers

Clear guidance is needed in the development and implementation of laboratory biomarkers in medicine. So far, no standardized phased approach is established that would pilot researchers and clinicians in this process. This leads to often incompletely validated biomarkers, which can bear the consequence of wrong applications, misinterpretation and inadequate management in the clinical context.

In this conceptual article, we describe a stepwise approach to develop and comprehensively validate laboratory biomarkers. We will delineate basic steps including technical performance, pre-analytical issues, and biological variation, as well as advanced aspects of biomarker utility comprising interpretability, diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, and health-care outcomes. These aspects will be illustrated by using well-known examples from the field of immunology.

The application of this conceptual framework will guide researchers in conducting meaningful projects to develop and evaluate biomarkers for the use in clinical practice. Furthermore, clinicians will be able to adequately interpret pre-clinical and clinical diagnostic literature and rationally apply biomarkers in clinical practice. Improvement in the implementation and application of biomarkers might relevantly change the management and outcomes of our patients for the better.

Correlation of ANA Characteristics with pANCA IFA Interference

BACKGROUND

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing by the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is important for the diagnosis of autoimmune vasculitis. A common analytical interference for ANCA-IFA is the presence of an antinuclear antibody (ANA), which can cause an apparent perinuclear ANCA (pANCA) result on ethanol-fixed neutrophils. Here, the association of ANA patterns, titers, and concentrations with pANCA interference is investigated.

METHODS

Samples positive for ANA by IFA with homogeneous, speckled, dense fine speckled (DFS), and centromere patterns were tested for ANA by enzyme immunoassay (EIA)] and for ANCA by IFA on ethanol-fixed neutrophils. Titers and concentrations were determined for the ANA-IFA and EIA, respectively, and correlated with the frequency of pANCA interpretations.

RESULTS

For ANA-EIA positive samples (≥1.1U), 20.0% led to a pANCA interpretation compared to 5.1% for negative samples (≤1.0U). For samples positive by ANA-IFA, 12.9% resulted in a pANCA interpretation. Interference on pANCA correlated with ANA-IFA titer, with ANA titers ≥1:1280 identified as pANCA positive in 20.9% of samples compared to 9.7% for titers <1:1280. There was also a correlation with ANA pattern, as homogeneous samples were most likely to be called positive for pANCA (31.7%), followed by speckled (8.8%), DFS (6.8%), and centromere (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Positivity for ANA by EIA is associated with increased prevalence of pANCA interpretation. Samples positive for ANA by IFA also demonstrated this association, particularly with higher-titer, homogeneous patterns. Laboratories can use this information to determine an optimal workflow for when investigating potential pANCA interferences.

Autoantibodies in the disease criteria for systemic sclerosis: The need for specification for optimal application

The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) entail three autoantibodies: anti-centromere antibodies (ACA), anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA), and anti-RNA-polymerase III antibodies (ARA). The importance of ACA and ATA in the classification criteria is evidence based, but the diagnostic value is overestimated by clinicians. Fortunately, these autoantibodies are characterized by good agreement between different immuno-assays. Inclusion of ARA, however, is based on limited evidence and is related to limited agreement between different immuno-assays. Harmonization of immuno-assays in terms of interpretation based on likelihood ratio's may improve future classification criteria for SSc and this needs to be achieved by close collaboration between clinicians, laboratory specialists and the diagnostic industry.

Artificial intelligence and the future of radiographic scoring in rheumatoid arthritis: a viewpoint

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune condition that predominantly affects the synovial joints, causing joint destruction, pain, and disability. Historically, the standard for measuring the long-term efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has been the assessment of plain radiographs with scoring techniques that quantify joint damage. However, with significant improvements in therapy, current radiographic scoring systems may no longer be fit for purpose for the milder spectrum of disease seen today. We argue that artificial intelligence is an apt solution to further improve upon radiographic scoring, as it can readily learn to recognize subtle patterns in imaging data to not only improve efficiency, but can also increase the sensitivity to variation in mild disease. Current work in the area demonstrates the feasibility of automating scoring but is yet to take full advantage of the strengths of artificial intelligence. By fully leveraging the power of artificial intelligence, faster and more sensitive scoring could enable the ongoing development of effective treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Multiparametric autoantibody analysis: a new paradigm for the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases

BACKGROUND

In patients affected by connective tissue diseases (CTDs), the identification of wide autoantibody profiles may prove useful in early diagnosis, in the evaluation of prognosis (risk stratification), and in predicting response to therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of multiparametric autoantibody analysis performed by a new fully automated particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) digital system in a large multicenter cohort of CTD patients and controls.

METHODS

Serum samples from 787 patients with CTD (166 systemic lupus erythematosus; 133 systemic sclerosis; 279 Sjögren's syndrome; 106 idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; 103 undifferentiated CTD), 339 patients with other disorders (disease controls) (118 infectious diseases, 110 organ-specific autoimmune diseases, 111 other rheumatic diseases), and 121 healthy subjects were collected in 13 rheumatologic centers of the FIRMA group. Sera were analyzed with the Aptiva-PMAT instrument (Inova Diagnostics) for a panel of 29 autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Multiparametric logistic regression showed that enlarged antibody profiles have a higher diagnostic efficiency than that of individual antibodies or of antibodies that constitute classification criteria for a given disease and that probability of disease increases with multiple positive autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that analyzes the clinical and diagnostic impact of autoantibody profiling in CTD. The results obtained with the new Aptiva-PMAT method may open interesting perspectives in the diagnosis and sub-classification of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Clinical Performance of Two Automated Immunoassays, EliA CTD Screen and QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus, for Antinuclear Antibody Screening

Background

Recently, two fully automated immunoassays for antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening were introduced EliA CTD Screen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Freiburg, Germany) and QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus (Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, USA). We evaluated their clinical performance in comparison with the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) and analyzed samples with discrepant results.

Methods

In total, 406 serum samples (206 from patients undergoing routine checkups and 200 from rheumatology clinic patients) were assayed using EliA, QUANTA Flash, and IIFA. We evaluated assay concordance and agreement and confirmed the presence of anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies in samples with discrepant automated immunoassay and IIFA results. Additionally, we compared the clinical performance of each assay in diagnosing ANA-associated rheumatic disease (AARD) and adjusted the cut-off values.

Results

In rheumatology clinic samples, the concordance and agreement were 91.5% and strong between EliA and QUANTA Flash, 79.0% and weak between EliA and IIFA, and 80.5% and moderate between QUANTA Flash and IIFA, respectively. In automated immunoassay-positive, IIFA-negative samples (N=15), all anti-ENA antibodies detected (6/15) were anti-Sjögren’s syndrome antigen A/Ro (Ro60) antibodies. The automated immunoassays and IIFA showed high accuracy for diagnosing AARD, and adjusted cut-off values improved their sensitivities (EliA with 0.56 ratio, 82.9% sensitivity; QUANTA Flash with 9.7 chemiluminescent units, 87.8% sensitivity).

Conclusions

The two automated immunoassays showed reliable performance compared with IIFA and can be efficiently used with the IIFA in clinical immunology laboratories. Clinical cut-off values can be adjusted according to the workflow in each laboratory.

Profiling of Myositis Specific Antibodies and Composite Scores as an Aid in the Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Myopathies

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) represent important diagnostic and stratification tools in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients. Here we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of MSA profiled by a novel particle based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in IIM and subsets thereof. (2) Methods: 264 IIM patients and 200 controls were tested for MSA using PMAT (Inova Diagnostics, research use only). Diagnostic performance was analyzed and composite scores were generated. (3) Results: The sensitivity/specificity of the individual MSA were: 19.7%/100% (Jo-1), 7.2%/100.0% (Mi-2), 3.0%/99.0% (NXP2), 3.8%/100.0% (SAE), 2.7%/100.0% (PL-7), 1.9%/99.5 (PL-12), 1.1%/100.0% (EJ), 15.5%/99.5% (TIF1γ), 8.3%/98.5% (MDA5), 6.1%/99.0% (HMGCR) and 1.9%/98.5% (SRP). Of all IIM patients, 180/264 tested positive for at least one of the MSAs. In the individual control group, 12/200 (6.0%) tested positive for at least one MSA, most of which had levels close to the cut-off (except one SRP and one PL-12). Only 6/264 (2.3%) IIM patients were positive for more than one antibody (MDA5/HMGCR, EJ/PL-7, 2 x MDA5/TIF1γ, EJ/SAE, SAE/TIF1γ). The overall sensitivity was 68.2% paired with a specificity of 94.0%, leading to an odds ratio of 33.8. The composite scores showed good discrimination between subgroups (e.g., anti-synthetase syndrome). (4) Conclusion: MSA, especially when combined in composite scores (here measured by PMAT), provide value in stratification of patients with IIM.

Comparison study of bead-based and line-blot multiplex ANA immunoassays in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is increasingly substituted by multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBA) and line-blot immunoassay (LIA). This study is to compare the diagnostic performance of MBA and LIA ANA assays on clinically characterized patient samples.

METHODS

A total of 728 serum samples from 385 patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), 204 patients with non-SARD diseases, and 139 apparently healthy subjects were tested with the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen and EuroLine ANA Profile 3 as the representative MBA and LIA technologies and HEp-2 ANA IFA. Clinical data were collected independent of laboratory analysis and later related to the ANA test results. The clinical diagnostic performances were analyzed using Analyse-it software.

RESULTS

The MBA demonstrated higher area under curve (AUC) compared to LIA (0.814 vs 0.761, p = 0.002) and HEp-2 IFA (0.814 vs 0.771, p = 0.008). The MBA and LIA ANA methods showed higher specificity (83.8% and 77.0% vs 67.6%, p < 0.001 and p = 0.005) but lower sensitivity (79.0% and 75.3% vs 86.5%, p < 0.001) compared to HEp-2 IFA. The MBA and LIA ANA revealed substantial to excellent agreements on specific antinuclear antibodies except anti-dsDNA, with the total agreement from 92.3 to 99.9% and Cohen's kappa from 0.71 to 0.98. The MBA demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (58.1% vs 19.8%, p < 0.001) and comparable specificity (95.9% vs 97.5%, p = 0.221) on anti-dsDNA assay for the diagnosis of SLE compared to LIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBA and LIA ANA assays have higher specificity but lower sensitivity compared to HEp-2 IFA. There are good agreements between MBA and LIA ANA for the specific antinuclear antibodies except for anti-dsDNA. The MBA ANA demonstrated better assay performance compared to LIA as the MBA possesses higher sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of SARD. Key Points • The multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBA) ANA outperformed line-blot immunoassay (LIA) and traditional HEp-2 IFA. • There are good agreements between the MBA BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen and LIA EuroLine ANA Profile 3 for the most of specific antinuclear antibodies except anti-dsDNA. • Additional anti-dsDNA testing is suggested when EuroLine ANA Profile 3 is used for the aid of SLE diagnosis and management. • The positive predictive value of both multiplex ANA assays can be substantially increased without significantly affecting negative predictive value by using at least two specific antinuclear antibodies for reporting a positive ANA result.

Assessment of antinuclear antibodies (ANA): National recommendations on behalf of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) represent a family of autoantibodies targeting ubiquitous cellular constituents and are a hallmark of systemic inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic diseases named connective tissue diseases (CTD). The gold standard method for ANA determination is indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on the human laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma cell line type 2 substrate (HEp-2), but with increasing demand for ANA testing, novel methods eased for automation emerged, which allows testing by staff less experienced in this specific field of laboratory diagnostic. In 2016 The working group (WG) for laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune diseases as part of the Committee for the Scientific Professional Development of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CSMBLM) published the data of a survey regarding general practice in laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune diseases in Croatia. Results indicated high diversity in the performance of autoantibody testing as well as reporting of the results and indicated the need of creating recommendations for the assessment of ANA that would help harmonize diagnostics of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases in Croatia. This document encompasses twenty-seven recommendations for ANA testing created concerning indications for ANA testing, preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical issues, including rational algorithm and quality control assurance. These recommendations are based on the relevant international recommendations and guidelines for the assessment of ANA testing and relevant literature search and should help to harmonize the approach in ANA testing and clarify differences in interpretation of the results obtained using different methods of determination.

Standardization and Quality Assessment Under the Perspective of Automated Computer-Assisted HEp-2 Immunofluorescence Assay Systems

The recent availability of automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems for the reading and interpretation of the anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) test performed with the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method on HEp-2 cells, has improved the reproducibility of the results and initiated a process of harmonization of this test. Furthermore, CAD systems provide quantitative expression of fluorescence intensity, allowing the introduction of objective quality control procedures to the monitoring of the entire process. The calibration of the reading systems and the automated image interpretation are essential prerequisites for obtaining reproducible and harmonized IIF test results and form the basis for standardization, regardless of the computer algorithms used in the different systems. The use of automated CAD systems, facilitating control procedures, represents a step forward for the quality certification of the laboratory.

Integrating quality assurance in autoimmunity: the changing face of the automated ANA IIF test

OBJECTIVES

Currently available computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for the detection of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay enable a standardized measurement of system-specific fluorescent intensity (FI) measures. We aimed to evaluate an internal quality control (iQC) program that controls the total ANA IIF process in routine practice.

METHODS

In addition to the kit iQC materials, supplemental quality indicators were integrated in a total quality assurance (QA) program: patient-derived iQC's samples (negative, 1/160 fine speckled and 1/160 homogeneous), median sample FI per run and percentage of ANA IIF positive samples per run. Analytical rejection criteria were based on the imprecision of the positivity index (PI) measure of the Zenit PRO system (Menarini). Clinical rejection criteria were based on changes in FI that correspond to a change in ANA IIF titer of ≥2. To evaluate the QA program, different artificial errors were introduced during the ANA IIF process. After every run, quality indicators were evaluated and compared to the pre-set target values.

RESULTS

Rescanning the ANA IIF slides five times, using an old conjugate and a needle obstruction resulted in analytically and even clinically relevant errors in ANA IIF results. All errors were correctly detected by the different defined quality indicators. Traditional Westgard rules, including analytically (and clinically) defined rejection limits were useful in monitoring quality indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of a total process iQC program in CAD systems, based on the specific FI measurands and performance criteria of the system, adds value to QA.

[Antinuclear antibodies : Practical diagnostic recommendations for dermatologists]

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a common diagnostic finding in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. In patients with typical clinical symptoms, the determination of ANA is of both diagnostic and prognostic importance. However, if ANA were determined due to unspecific symptoms, the interpretation of ANA findings can be problematic. In these cases, misjudgements with severe consequences for the patients are possible. Many systemic autoimmune diseases have prominent early skin involvement and the dermatologist can be the first physician that such a patient sees. Therefore, knowledge of ANA diagnostics is important for dermatologists. Basic principles of autoantibody diagnostics, guidance for the interpretation of laboratory results and new developments are discussed in this overview.

The significance of cytoplasmic antinuclear antibody patterns in autoimmune liver disease

We aimed to determine the significance of cytoplasmic antinuclear antibody (ANA) patterns using computer-aided immunofluorescence microscopy in patients with autoimmune liver diseases (AILD). ANA staining pattern was identified by treating cultured human epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells with the sera of the patients. Medical records of patients with suspected AILD who had positive cytoplasmic ANA patterns between February 2017 and November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for clinical, laboratory, and immunological data. Cytoplasmic ANA patterns of AILD and non-AILD groups were compared. Further subgroup analysis of patients with AILD who had reticular or speckled cytoplasmic ANA patterns was conducted. We found that among the 196 patients with positive cytoplasmic ANA patterns, 113 (57.6%) were diagnosed with AILD. The percentage of reticular cytoplasmic pattern was higher in the AILD group than that in the non-AILD group (64.0% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with AILD who exhibited a reticular ANA pattern demonstrated a higher positive rate for anti-mitochondrial antibodies (66.7% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001) than those who exhibited the speckled ANA pattern. Moreover, AILD patients with the reticular ANA pattern displayed a lower positive rate for anti-smooth muscle antibodies (0% vs. 45%, p < 0.001) and nuclear ANA pattern (73.2% vs. 97.5%, p = 0.003) than those with the speckled ANA pattern. Therefore, cytoplasmic ANA patterns could be used to guide AILD characterization in suspected AILD cases, especially as the reticular ANA pattern is strongly associated with AILD. Thus, it is important to check cytoplasmic ANA patterns for AILD evaluation, even when nuclear ANA patterns are negative.

Evaluation of a Fully Automated Antinuclear Antibody Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay in Routine Use

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells as a substrate is the gold standard for detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in patient serum. However, the ANA IFA has labor-intensive nature of the procedure and lacks adequate standardization. To overcome these drawbacks, the automation has been developed and implemented to the clinical laboratory. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the analytical performance of a fully automated Helios ANA IFA analyzer in a real-life laboratory setting, and to compare the time and the cost of ANA IFA testing before and after adopting the Helios system. A total of 3,276 consecutive serum samples were analyzed for ANA using the Helios system from May to August 2019. The positive/negative results, staining patterns, and endpoint titers were compared between Helios and visual readings. Furthermore, the turnaround time and the number of wells used were compared before and after the introduction of Helios system. Of the 3,276 samples tested, 748 were positive and 2,528 were negative based on visual readings. Using visual reading as the reference standard, the overall relative sensitivity, relative specificity, and concordance of Helios reading were 73.3, 99.4, and 93.4% (κ = 0.80), respectively. For pattern recognition, the overall agreement was 70.1% (298/425) for single patterns, and 72.4% (89/123) for mixed patterns. For titration, there was an agreement of 75.9% (211/278) between automated and classical endpoint titers by regarding within ± one titer difference as acceptable. Helios significantly shortened the median turnaround time from 100.6 to 55.7 h (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, routine use of the system reduced the average number of wells used per test from 4 to 1.5. Helios shows good agreement in distinguishing between positive and negative results. However, it still has limitations in positive/negative discrimination, pattern recognition, and endpoint titer prediction, requiring additional validation of results by human observers. Helios provides significant advantages in routine laboratory ANA IFA work in terms of labor, time, and cost savings. We hope that upgrading and developing softwares with more reliable capabilities will allow automated ANA IFA analyzers to be fully integrated into the routine operations of the clinical laboratory.

Infusion of anti-DFS70 antibodies prolonged survival of lupus-prone mice

BACKGROUND

Systemic-lupus-nephritis is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by immune complex deposition and a flare of autoantibodies and leading to renal injury.

OBJECTIVES

To expose anti-Dense-Fine-Speckled-70 (DFS70)-antibodies to genetically-prone-lupus-mice.

METHODS

NZBXW/F1 female mice were monitored for the onset of glomerulonephritis by proteinuria upon infusion of anti-DFS70 (40 μg/mouse), commercial-human-IgG (cIgG) or phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) as controls. The survival time was detected by mice death. Circulating anti-dsDNA were tested by ELISA. Proteinuria, was defined by a standard semi-quantitative-Bayer-Multistix-dipstick. Kidney histology was analyzed by periodic-acid-Schiff-PAS staining.

RESULTS

A significantly higher percentage of anti-DFS70-infused mice exhibited prolonged survival time as compared with cIgG and PBS-subjected mice (p < 0.022). One mouse out of 10 mice injected with anti-DFS70-antibodies died at week 36, whereas, 6 out of 10 mice subjected with PBS found dead at this time. Eighty percent of anti-DFS70 injected mice did not show severe glomerulonephritis by histology.

CONCLUSIONS

anti-DFS70 attenuated the progression of glomerulonephritis and prolonged the survival time. Circulating anti-DFS70-autoantibodies may confer a protective role against renal injury in murine-lupus-nephritis. Our data may propose a novel therapy approach for lupus patients.

Understanding and interpreting antinuclear antibody tests in systemic rheumatic diseases

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are valuable laboratory markers to screen for and support the diagnosis of various rheumatic diseases (known as ANA-associated rheumatic diseases). The importance of ANA testing has been reinforced by the inclusion of ANA positivity as an entry criterion in the 2019 systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria. In addition, specific ANAs (such as antibodies to Sm, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), SSA/Ro60, U1RNP, topoisomerase I, centromere protein B (CENPB), RNA polymerase III and Jo1) are included in classification criteria for other rheumatic diseases. A number of techniques are available for detecting antibodies to a selection of clinically relevant antigens (such as indirect immunofluorescence and solid phase assays). In this Review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques, as well as the clinical relevance of the differences between the techniques, to provide guidance in understanding and interpreting ANA test results. Such understanding not only necessitates insight into the sensitivity and specificity of each assay, but also into the importance of the disease context and antibody level. We also highlight the value of titre-specific information (such as likelihood ratios).

Evaluation of a novel latex enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for detecting autoantibody against extractable nuclear antigens

Detection of autoantibody against extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune diseases.In this study, we assessed the performance of LETIA in detecting anti-ENAs. Total 606 serum samples from the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were collected. Anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Sm, anti-U1-snRNP, and anti-Sm/RNP were parallelly detected by LETIA and line immunoblot (LIA). Besides, this study assessed LETIA for its repeatability in detecting anti-ENAs autoantibodies, and consistency with LIA. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was drawn to assess the accuracy of LETIA. The LETIA and LIA showed high coincidence rate in detecting anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Sm, anti-U1-snRNP, and anti-Sm/RNP autoantibodies, with the results being 87.22%, 96.61%, 97.03%, 88.28%, and 92.06%, respectively. Almost perfect consistency (kappa > 0.8) were found in the detection of anti-SSB and anti-Sm by LETIA and LIA. While in the detection of anti-SSA, anti-U1-snRNP, and anti-Sm/RNP, moderate consistency (0.6 ⩽ kappa ⩽ 0.8) were shown. The AUCs of anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Sm, anti-U1-snRNP, and anti-Sm/RNP detected by LETIA were 0.972 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.941–1.000, p < 0.001), 0.986 (95% CI: 0.967–1.000, p < 0.001), 0.912 (95% CI: 0.763–1.000, p < 0.001), 0.829 (95% CI: 0.731–0.928, p < 0.001), and 0.828 (95% CI: 0.715–0.941, p < 0.001), respectively. LETIA and LIA showed considerable consistency in detecting anti-ENAs. Moreover, with the pronounced advantages of automatic and rapid detection, and high universality, LETIA can meet the requirements for quantitative detection of anti-ENAs.

The clinical relevance of anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by the Elia™ dsDNA assay in patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence on the HEp-2 cell

OBJECTIVES

Data on the clinical importance of the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence on the HEp-2 cell (IIF) are sparse and are especially not available for all common commercially available assays. This study aimed to assess the clinical significance of anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by the Elia™ dsDNA assay in patients with negative IIF.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the medical records of 234 consecutive subjects with detectable anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by the Elia™ dsDNA assay.

RESULTS

A total of 124 subjects with detectable anti-dsDNA autoantibodies were IIF-negative, but yielded positive or borderline results in the Elia™ CTD screen assay for antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Within this group, 6/49 IIF-negative patients (12%) with ANA-associated systemic autoimmune rheumatic disorders (AASARD) and 118/185 subjects (64%) with various other diseases (Non-AASARD) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference with regard to the concentrations of anti-dsDNA antibodies (p=0.53) between the AASARD and the Non-AASARD group. Within the AASARD group, four patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, treated), discoid lupus erythematosus (untreated), indetermined connective tissue disease (untreated) and polymyositis (treated) had positive anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, whereas two patients with treated SLE, thereby one in remission, had borderline concentrations of anti-dsDNA antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies in IIF-negative patients can be of clinical relevance in some cases. Our results further support the combined use of IIF and solid-phase assays in screening algorithms for ANA, in order to avoid overlooking potentially important autoantibody entities.

Autoantibodies to stratify systemic sclerosis patients into clinically actionable subsets

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic disease of unknown etiology characterized by vascular abnormalities and fibrosis involving the skin and internal organs, especially the gastrointestinal tract, lung, heart and kidneys. Although the disease was historically stratified according to the extent of skin involvement, more recent approaches place more emphasis on patterns and extent of internal organ involvement. Despite numerous clinical trials, disease-modifying treatment options are still limited resulting in persistent poor quality of life and high mortality. This review provides an overview of autoantibodies in SSc and novel approaches to stratify the disease into clinically actionable subsets.

A new diagnostic algorithm for pattern-oriented autoantibody testing according to the ICAP nomenclature: A pilot study

The commercial tests currently available as second-level tests to detect ANA sub-specificities are generally used independently from the ANA immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the use of a customizable pattern-oriented antigenic panel by immunoblot (IB) using the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) classification scheme, in order to introduce a novel and updated autoimmune diagnostic flowchart. 710 sera referred for routine ANA testing were selected on the basis of the ANA pattern according to the ICAP nomenclature (nuclear speckled AC-2,4,5; nucleolar AC-8,9,10,29; cytoplasmic speckled AC-18,19,20) and on an IIF titer ≥1:320. They were then assayed by three experimental IB assays using a panel of selected antigens. ICAP-oriented IB detected 515 antibody reactivities vs. 457 of traditional anti-ENA in the nuclear speckled pattern group, 108 vs. 28 in the nucleolar pattern group, and 43 vs. 34 in the cytoplasmic speckled pattern. This pilot study may lead the way for a new approach introducing an ICAP pattern-oriented follow up testing as a valid alternative to the existing standard panels, thus enabling more patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease to be accurately diagnosed.