1
|
Benyettou F, Das G, Boitet M, Varghese S, Khair M, Das AK, Matouk Z, Prakasam T, Bazin P, Sharma SK, Thomas S, He Y, Straubinger R, Garai B, Jagannathan R, Gándara F, El-Roz M, Trabolsi A. Freezing-Activated Covalent Organic Frameworks for Precise Fluorescence Cryo-Imaging of Cancer Tissue. J Am Chem Soc 2025; 147:8188-8204. [PMID: 40013936 PMCID: PMC11912341 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c13848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 02/07/2025] [Indexed: 02/28/2025]
Abstract
Cryosurgery represents a transformative approach in the treatment of resistant tumors, utilizing extreme cold to selectively ablate malignant tissue. However, the clinical success of this technique is constrained by the limited ability of current imaging techniques to differentiate effectively between cancerous and healthy tissues with high spatial resolution. To overcome this challenge, we present a nanoscale Covalent Organic Framework, nTG-DFP-COF, specifically designed to enhance fluorescence-guided cryo-imaging. This framework exhibits a unique temperature-dependent luminescence, that results in enhanced fluorescence emission under cryogenic conditions, enabling precise tissue differentiation during surgical procedures. Engineered for biocompatibility and water dispersibility, nTG-DFP-COF demonstrates minimal cytotoxicity and exceptional specificity toward cancer cells. Comprehensive in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo evaluations confirm its structural stability and functional efficacy under cryogenic conditions. This innovation not only enhances the precision and safety of cryosurgical procedures but also advances the integration of diagnostic and therapeutic functionalities into a unified platform. By substantially improving tumor targeting accuracy, the use of nTG-DFP-COF will reduce the need for repeat surgeries, facilitate faster recovery, and minimize healthcare costs, thus setting a new standard in oncologic imaging and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Benyettou
- Chemistry
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Gobinda Das
- Chemistry
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Maylis Boitet
- Core
Technology Platforms, New York University
Abu Dhabi, 129188 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sabu Varghese
- Core
Technology Platforms, New York University
Abu Dhabi, 129188 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mostafa Khair
- Core
Technology Platforms, New York University
Abu Dhabi, 129188 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Akshaya Kumar Das
- Chemistry
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Zineb Matouk
- Technology
Innovative Institute, Abu Dhabi 9639, United Arab
Emirates
| | - Thirumurugan Prakasam
- Chemistry
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Philippe Bazin
- Normandie
Univ, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, CNRS, LCS, Caen 14000, France
| | - Sudhir Kumar Sharma
- Engineering
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sneha Thomas
- Core
Technology Platforms, New York University
Abu Dhabi, 129188 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Yao He
- Core
Technology Platforms, New York University
Abu Dhabi, 129188 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rainer Straubinger
- Core
Technology Platforms, New York University
Abu Dhabi, 129188 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Bikash Garai
- Chemistry
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ramesh Jagannathan
- Engineering
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| | - Felipe Gándara
- Instituto
de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid-CSIC, C. Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Mohamad El-Roz
- Normandie
Univ, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, CNRS, LCS, Caen 14000, France
| | - Ali Trabolsi
- Chemistry
Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martins FE, Lumen N, Holm HV. Management of the Devastated Bladder Outlet after Prostate CANCER Treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:149-162. [PMID: 38750347 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Devastating complications of the bladder outlet resulting from prostate cancer treatments are relatively uncommon. However, the combination of the high incidence of prostate cancer and patient longevity after treatment have raised awareness of adverse outcomes deteriorating patients' quality of life. This narrative review discusses the diagnostic work-up and management options for bladder outlet obstruction resulting from prostate cancer treatments, including those that require urinary diversion. RECENT FINDINGS The devastated bladder outlet can be a consequence of the treatment of benign conditions, but more frequently from complications of pelvic cancer treatments. Regardless of etiology, the initial treatment ladder involves endoluminal options such as dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy, with or without intralesional injection of anti-fibrotic agents. If these conservative strategies fail, surgical reconstruction should be considered. Although surgical reconstruction provides the best prospect of durable success, reconstructive procedures are also associated with serious complications. In the worst circumstances, such as prior radiotherapy, failed reconstruction, devastated bladder outlet with end-stage bladders, or patient's severe comorbidities, reconstruction may neither be realistic nor justified. Urinary diversion with or without cystectomy may be the best option for these patients. Thorough patient counseling before treatment selection is of utmost importance. Outcomes and repercussions on quality of life vary extensively with management options. Meticulous preoperative diagnostic evaluation is paramount in selecting the right treatment strategy for each individual patient. The risk of bladder outlet obstruction, and its severest form, devastated bladder outlet, after treatment of prostate cancer is not negligible, especially following radiation. Management includes endoluminal treatment, open or robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction, and urinary diversion in the worst circumstances, with varying success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, University of Lisbon, School of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário, Lisboa Norte (CHULN), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chinenov DV, Shpot EV, Chernov YN, Gerasimov AN, Kazachevskaya LY, Lyapichev KA, Ismailov HM, Tsukkiev ZK, Korolev DO, Rapoport LM. Evaluation of functional and oncological outcomes of localized prostate cancer after different minimally invasive therapeutic methods: A single center experience. Urologia 2024; 91:311-319. [PMID: 38247121 DOI: 10.1177/03915603231226366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the functional and oncological results of minimally invasive treatment methods: cryoablation, brachytherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy of localized prostate cancer in a single hospital. METHODS One hundred sixty patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with minimally invasive methods (53, 52, 55 patients with cryoablation, brachytherapy and HIFU therapy, respectively). Prostate-specific antigen and evaluation of post-procedure biopsies were used as an assessment. The review of functional indicators and quality of life was made with International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. RESULTS Patients after cryoablation showed worse results of oncological control according to positive repeat biopsies, best indicators were observed after brachytherapy. When considering the IPSS results, there were statistically significantly worse scores in the brachytherapy group in the early postoperative period, these differences do not reach statistical significance in the late period in the brachytherapy and cryoablation groups. Patients in the cryoablation group showed worse indicators of IIEF-5; in the early postoperative period; in the late follow-up period, the indicators of erectile function in patients in the cryoablation group did not statistically significantly differ from those in patients after brachytherapy. Patients after HIFU therapy showed fewer cases of de novo erectile dysfunction during the follow-up period of 3 years, higher average IIEF-5 scores, lower IPSS scores and better QoL results. CONCLUSION The recurrence of prostate cancer was statistically significantly higher in the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 3 grade group. HIFU therapy had better urination indicators compared to other groups, that can be associated with the laser enucleation of prostatic hyperplasia. The advantage was noted in patients after HIFU therapy when comparing the parameters to the IIEF-5 thus, HIFU treatment had a better impact on patients' QoL with localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D V Chinenov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - E V Shpot
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Y N Chernov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Gerasimov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - L Y Kazachevskaya
- The Pathology Residency Program at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - K A Lyapichev
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - H M Ismailov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Z K Tsukkiev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - D O Korolev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - L M Rapoport
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mokbel K, Kodresko A, Ghazal H, Mokbel R, Trembley J, Jouhara H. Cryogenic Media in Biomedical Applications: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. In Vivo 2024; 38:1-39. [PMID: 38148045 PMCID: PMC10756490 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
This paper explores the crucial role of cryogenic mediums in driving breakthroughs within the biomedical sector. The objective was to investigate, critically discuss, and present the current knowledge and state-of-the-art practices, along with the challenges and perspectives of the most common applications. Through an extensive literature review, this work aims to supplement existing research, offering a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of the subject. Biomedical research involving cryogenic mediums is advancing on multiple fronts, including the development of advanced medical technologies, clinical treatments for life-threatening conditions, high-quality biospecimen preservation, and antimicrobial interventions in industrial food processing. These advances open new horizons and present cutting-edge opportunities for research and the medical community. While the current body of evidence showcases the impressive impact of cryogenic mediums, such as nitrogen, helium, argon, and oxygen, on revolutionary developments, reaching definitive conclusions on their efficiency and safety remains challenging due to process complexity and research scarcity with a moderate certainty of evidence. Knowledge gaps further underline the need for additional studies to facilitate cryogenic research in developing innovative technological processes in biomedicine. These advancements have the potential to reshape the modern world and significantly enhance the quality of life for people worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kefah Mokbel
- The London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London, U.K
| | - Alevtina Kodresko
- Heat Pipe and Thermal Management Research Group, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University, London, U.K
| | - Heba Ghazal
- Kingston University, School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston Upon Thames, U.K
| | - Ramia Mokbel
- The Princess Grace Hospital, part of HCA Healthcare UK, London, U.K
| | - Jon Trembley
- Air Products PLC, Hersham Place Technology Park, Surrey, U.K
| | - Hussam Jouhara
- Heat Pipe and Thermal Management Research Group, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University, London, U.K.;
- Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deivasigamani S, Kotamarti S, Rastinehad AR, Salas RS, de la Rosette JJMCH, Lepor H, Pinto P, Ahmed HU, Gill I, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Wysock J, Feller JF, Crouzet S, Kumar M P, Seguier D, Adams ES, Michael Z, Abreu A, Jack Tay K, Ward JF, Shinohara K, Katz AE, Villers A, Chin JL, Stricker PD, Baco E, Macek P, Ahmad AE, Chiu PKF, Crawford ED, Rogers CG, Futterer JJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Robertson CN, Hadaschik B, Marra G, Valerio M, Chong KT, Kasivisvanathan V, Tan WP, Lomas D, Walz J, Guimaraes GC, Mertziotis NI, Becher E, Finelli A, Kasraeian A, Lebastchi AH, Vora A, Rosen MA, Bakir B, Arcot R, Yee S, Netsch C, Meng X, de Reijke TM, Tan YG, Regusci S, Benjamin TGR, Olivares R, Noureldin M, Bianco FJ, Sivaraman A, Kim FJ, Given RW, Dason S, Sheetz TJ, Shoji S, Schulman A, Royce P, Shah TT, Scionti S, Salomon G, Laguna P, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Aminsharifi A, Cathelineau X, Gontero P, Stabile A, Grummet J, Ledbetter L, Graton M, Stephen Jones J, Polascik TJ. Primary Whole-gland Ablation for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focal Therapy Society Best Practice Statement. Eur Urol 2023; 84:547-560. [PMID: 37419773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whole-gland ablation is a feasible and effective minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Previous systematic reviews supported evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but oncological outcomes were inconclusive owing to limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the real-world data on the mid- to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with clinically localized PCa, and to provide expert recommendations and commentary on these findings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library publications through February 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. As endpoints, baseline clinical characteristics, and oncological and functional outcomes were assessed. To estimate the pooled prevalence of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes, and to quantify and explain the heterogeneity, random-effect meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-nine studies were identified, including 14 on cryoablation and 15 on HIFU with a median follow-up of 72 mo. Most of the studies were retrospective (n = 23), with IDEAL (idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term study) stage 2b (n = 20) being most common. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival rates at 10 yr were 58%, 96%, 63%, 71-79%, and 84%, respectively. Erectile function was preserved in 37% of cases, and overall pad-free continence was achieved in 96% of cases, with a 1-yr rate of 97.4-98.8%. The rates of stricture, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, rectourethral fistula, and sepsis were observed to be 11%, 9.5%, 8%, 0.7%, and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mid- to long-term real-world data, and the safety profiles of cryoablation and HIFU are sound to support and be offered as primary treatment for appropriate patients with localized PCa. When compared with other existing treatment modalities for PCa, these ablative therapies provide nearly equivalent intermediate- to long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes, as well as excellent pad-free continence rates in the primary setting. This real-world clinical evidence provides long-term oncological and functional outcomes that enhance shared decision-making when balancing risks and expected outcomes that reflect patient preferences and values. PATIENT SUMMARY Cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound are minimally invasive treatments available to selectively treat localized prostate cancer, considering their nearly comparable intermediate- to long term cancer control and preservation of urinary continence to other radical treatments in the primary setting. However, a well-informed decision should be made based on one's values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srinath Kotamarti
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Wysock
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Denis Seguier
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Eric S Adams
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zoe Michael
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katsuto Shinohara
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aaron E Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Joseph L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eduard Baco
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Ardalan E Ahmad
- Department of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter K F Chiu
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cary N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Service of Urology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek Lomas
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anup Vora
- Chesapeake Urology, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Department of Urology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rohit Arcot
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Samuel Yee
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Stefano Regusci
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Swiss International Prostate Centelenor, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ruben Olivares
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Fernando J Bianco
- Urological Research Network, Urologist Specialist Group, Miami Lakes, FL, USA
| | - Arjun Sivaraman
- Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tyler J Sheetz
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Department of Urology, Maimonides Health Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Royce
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Alireza Aminsharifi
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leila Ledbetter
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Graton
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jain DP, Dinakar YH, Kumar H, Jain R, Jain V. The multifaceted role of extracellular vesicles in prostate cancer-a review. CANCER DRUG RESISTANCE (ALHAMBRA, CALIF.) 2023; 6:481-498. [PMID: 37842237 PMCID: PMC10571058 DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2023.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most prominent form of cancer in men and confers the highest mortality after lung cancer. The term "extracellular vesicles" refers to minute endosomal-derived membrane microvesicles and it was demonstrated that extracellular vesicles affect the environment in which tumors originate. Extracellular vesicles' involvement is also established in the development of drug resistance, angiogenesis, stemness, and radioresistance in various cancers including prostate cancer. Extracellular vesicles influence the general environment, processes, and growth of prostate cancer and can be a potential area that offers a significant lead in prostate cancer therapy. In this review, we have elaborated on the multifaceted role of extracellular vesicles in various processes involved in the development of prostate cancer, and their multitude of applications in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer through the encapsulation of various bioactives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Prakash Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570015, India
| | - Yirivinti Hayagreeva Dinakar
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570015, India
| | - Hitesh Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570015, India
| | - Rupshee Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570015, India
| | - Vikas Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570015, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kumar D, Nath K, Lal H, Gupta A. Noninvasive urine metabolomics of prostate cancer and its therapeutic approaches: a current scenario and future perspective. Expert Rev Proteomics 2021; 18:995-1008. [PMID: 34821179 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2021.2011225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The sensitive, specific, fast, robust and noninvasive biomarkers for the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) remain elusive in medical research. However, efforts are in full sway to investigate and resolve these puzzles for clinical practice. Advances in modern analytical techniques, sample processing, and the emergence of multiple omics approaches have created a great hope for the development of better detection modalities for PC. The objective of the present review is to provide a concise overview of the PC metabolomics-based potential discriminating molecules in urine samples using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. AREA COVERED A literature search was executed to find the studies reporting the noninvasive urine-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of underlying disease. Most studies have extensivelyreported PC discriminating molecules with their respective controls. Additionally, pathophysiology and the treatment paradigm of PC are summarized and related to the insights underpinning the therapeutic intervention of PC. EXPERT OPINION With multi-centric, global, comprehensive omics approaches via either a non- or least-invasive bio-matrix may open new avenues of research for PC biomarker discovery, backed by a molecular mechanistic outline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Kumar
- Centre of Biomedical Research, SGPGIMS Campus, Lucknow, India
| | - Kavindra Nath
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hira Lal
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Centre of Biomedical Research, SGPGIMS Campus, Lucknow, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Martins FE, Holm HV, Lumen N. Devastated Bladder Outlet in Pelvic Cancer Survivors: Issues on Surgical Reconstruction and Quality of Life. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4920. [PMID: 34768438 PMCID: PMC8584541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder outlet obstruction following treatment of pelvic cancer, predominantly prostate cancer, occurs in 1-8% of patients. The high incidence of prostate cancer combined with the long-life expectancy after treatment has increased concerns with cancer survivorship care. However, despite increased oncological cure rates, these adverse events do occur, compromising patients' quality of life. Non-traumatic obstruction of the posterior urethra and bladder neck include membranous and prostatic urethral stenosis and bladder neck stenosis (also known as contracture). The devastated bladder outlet can result from benign conditions, such as neurogenic dysfunction, trauma, iatrogenic causes, or more frequently from complications of oncologic treatment, such as prostate, bladder and rectum. Most posterior urethral stenoses may respond to endoluminal treatments such as dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy, and occasionally urethral stents. Although surgical reconstruction offers the best chance of durable success, these reconstructive options are fraught with severe complications and, therefore, are far from being ideal. In patients with prior RT, failed reconstruction, densely fibrotic and/or necrotic and calcified posterior urethra, refractory incontinence or severe comorbidities, reconstruction may not be either feasible or recommended. In these cases, urinary diversion with or without cystectomy is usually required. This review aims to discuss the diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for patients with bladder outlet obstruction with a special emphasis on patients unsuitable for reconstruction of the posterior urethra and requiring urinary diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E. Martins
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Santa Maria/CHULN, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Does the type of cryoprobe affect oncological and functional outcomes in men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with primary whole gland prostate cryoablation? Curr Urol 2021; 15:79-84. [PMID: 34168524 PMCID: PMC8221007 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of primary whole gland cryoablation of the prostate using the variable ice cryoprobe (V-Probe®) and the conventional fixed-size ice probe. Materials and methods We reviewed the Cryo On-Line Data Registry for men who were treated with primary whole gland prostate cryoablation from 2000 through 2017. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare timing to biochemical recurrence between the V-Probe® and fixed-size ice probe after adjusting for preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, preoperative Gleason score, and preoperative T stage. Results A total of 1124 men were included. Median age, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA were 70 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 65-74 years), 7 (IQR: 6-7) and 5.9 ng/mL (IQR: 4.6-8.1 ng/mL), respectively. The median follow-up time was 25.0 months (IQR: 11.2-48.6 months). V-Probes® were used in 269 (23.9%) cases and fixed-size ice probes in 858 (76.1%) cases. After adjusting for clinical T stage, PSA, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and preoperative Gleason score, on the multivariate Cox regression model, we found that there was no significant difference between the type of probe and timing to biochemical recurrence (p = 0.35). On multivariate logistic regression, using the V-Probe® was associated with a 91% increase in postoperative urinary retention compared to the fixed-size ice probe (p = 0.003). Conclusions The use of the V-Probe® versus conventional fixed-size ice probe was not associated with a difference in biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing primary cryoablation of the prostate.
Collapse
|
10
|
Applewhite J, Barker J, Vestal JC. Successful Use of Absorbable Hydrogel Rectal Spacers (SpaceOAR) Before Salvage Radiation Therapy After Previous Prostate Cryotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100647. [PMID: 33748548 PMCID: PMC7966841 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
11
|
McNiel D, Hennemeyer C, Woodhead G, McGregor H. Gallbladder Cryoablation: A Novel Option for High-Risk Patients with Gallbladder Disease. Am J Med 2021; 134:326-331. [PMID: 33181108 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Management of high-risk surgical patients with cholecystitis poses a significant clinical problem. These patients are often left with the options of permanent cholecystostomy tube drainage or high-risk surgery. Numerous attempts have been made over the past 4 decades to fulfill the need for a minimally invasive, definitive treatment option for such gallbladder disease. These attempts have largely focused on endoluminal ablation with a variety of sclerosants and have been unable to reliably achieve permanent gallbladder devitalization. The advent of modern percutaneous devices and techniques have provided further opportunity to develop minimally invasive treatment options for high-risk patients. Cryoablation, a thermal ablation modality that induces cell death through tissue freezing, has recently emerged as a promising potential option to treat gallbladder disease. Early studies have demonstrated good technical and clinical success, and a prospective trial is ongoing. This manuscript explains the clinical need for gallbladder cryoablation, briefly revisits historical minimally invasive treatments, describes cryoablation technology and why it is well suited for the gallbladder, and reviews the preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of gallbladder cryoablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David McNiel
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | | | - Greg Woodhead
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Hugh McGregor
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cryotherapy is an available treatment option for localized prostate cancer (PC) included on minimal invasive therapies but still under evaluation. We started our cryotherapy program in 2008 for selected patients with localized PC. Our objective is to evaluate the oncologic and functional outcomes of primary cryotherapy in men with clinically localized PC. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent primary cryotherapy for localized PC treatment at our center between January 2008 and December 2017. In order to downsize prostates between 40 and 60cc neoadjuvant 3-month hormonal therapy was administered. Primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) rate as defined by the Phoenix criteria. Secondary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), patient reported functional outcomes and complication rates. Factors influencing de BPFS were evaluated individually using Kaplan-Meyer and Cox regression models and in a multivariate model using Cox regression. RESULTS During the mentioned period, a total of 177 men were treated with cryotherapy. With a mean follow-up of 60 months (SD 32.9), the Kaplan-Meier analysis shows an overall BPFS rate was 67%. BPFS by risk group was 70.2%, 70.3% and 50.0% for the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively (p = 0.925). Overall time to BR was 93.67 months (SD 2.84, IC95%: 88.10-99.24): 95.91 (SD 3,44), 93.23 (SD 4.81) and 89.77 (SD 6.67) months for the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, the only predictor of biochemical progression was de PSA nadir (HR 1.56 IC95%: 1.50-1.63). Continence was fully maintained in 95% of patients after the procedure. Postoperative complications included UTI (17.5%), hematuria (9.6%), perineal hematoma (11%) and postoperative pain (4.5%). No fistulas were reported. 8.5% of patients had acute urinary retention solved conservatively. CONCLUSION Cryotherapy is a safe option for selected patients with localized prostate cancer that provides competitive oncologic outcomes and a low morbidity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Mercader
- Urology Department, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Agustín Franco
- Urology Department, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María J Ribal
- Urology Department, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barqawi A, Pessoa RR, Al-Musawi M, MacDermott T, O'Donnell CI. The Impact of Performing a 3D Mapping Biopsy Prior to Primary Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Urology 2020; 144:171-176. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
14
|
Scheltema MJ, Chang JI, van den Bos W, Gielchinsky I, Nguyen TV, Reijke TDM, Siriwardana AR, Böhm M, de la Rosette JJ, Stricker PD. Impact on genitourinary function and quality of life following focal irreversible electroporation of different prostate segments. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 24:268-275. [PMID: 30211680 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.17374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the genitourinary function and quality of life (QoL) following the ablation of different prostate segments with irreversible electroporation (IRE) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Sixty patients who received primary focal IRE for organ-confined PCa were recruited for this study. Patients were evaluated for genitourinary function and QoL per prostate segment treated (anterior vs. posterior, apex vs. base vs. apex-to-base, unilateral vs. bilateral). IRE system settings and patient characteristics were compared between patients with preserved vs. those with impaired erectile function and urinary continence. Data were prospectively collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using the expanded prostate cancer index composite, American Urological Association symptom score, SF-12 physical and mental component summary surveys. Difference over time within segments per questionnaire was evaluated using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Outcome differences between segments were assessed using covariance models. Baseline measurements included questionnaire scores, age, and prostate volume. RESULTS There were no statistically significant changes over time for overall urinary (P = 0.07-0.89), bowel (P = 0.06-0.79), physical (P = 0.18-0.71) and mental (P = 0.45-0.94) QoL scores within each segment. Deterioration of sexual function scores was observed at 6 months within each segment (P = 0.001-0.16). There were no statistically significant differences in QoL scores between prostate segments (P = 0.08-0.97). Older patients or those with poor baseline sexual function at time of treatment were associated with a greater risk of developing erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSION IRE is a feasible modality for all prostate segments without any significantly different effect on the QoL outcomes. Older patients and those with poor sexual function need to be counseled regarding the risk of erectile dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John I Chang
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst; St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Willemien van den Bos
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst., St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Ilan Gielchinsky
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia, St Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Tuan V Nguyen
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia,. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Amila R Siriwardana
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maret Böhm
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jean J de la Rosette
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Urology, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kahokehr AA, Peterson AC, Lentz AC. Posterior urethral stenosis after prostate cancer treatment: contemporary options for definitive management. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:580-592. [PMID: 30211048 PMCID: PMC6127549 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.04.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Posterior urethral stenosis (PUS) is an uncommon but challenging problem following prostate cancer therapy. A review of the recent literature on the prevalence of PUS and treatment modalities used in the last decade was performed. A summative narrative of current accepted techniques in management of PUS is presented, and supplement with our own experience and algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arman A Kahokehr
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Andrew C Peterson
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Aaron C Lentz
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shah S, Young HN, Cobran EK. Comparative Effectiveness of Conservative Management Compared to Cryotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients. Am J Mens Health 2018; 12:1681-1691. [PMID: 29877137 PMCID: PMC6142136 DOI: 10.1177/1557988318781731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The high frequency of treatment-related side effects for men with localized prostate cancer creates uncertainty for treatment outcomes. This study assessed the comparative effectiveness of treatment-related side effects associated with conservative management and cryotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted, using the linked data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare, which included patients diagnosed from 2000 through year 2013, and their Medicare claims information from 2000 through 2014. To compare the differences in baseline characteristics and treatment-related side effects between the study cohorts, χ2 tests were conducted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between treatment selection and side effects. There were 7,998 and 3,051 patients in the conservative management and cryotherapy cohort, respectively. The likelihood of erectile dysfunction, lower urinary tract obstruction, urinary fistula, urinary incontinence, and hydronephrosis was reported to be significantly lower (53%, 35%, 69%, 65%, and 36%, respectively) in the conservative management cohort. Conservative management had a lower likelihood of treatment-related side effects compared to cryotherapy. However, further research is needed to compare other significant long-term outcomes such as costs associated with these treatment choices and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Shah
- 1 Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Health Services, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Henry N Young
- 1 Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Health Services, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Ewan K Cobran
- 1 Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Health Services, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Murray KS, Akin O, Coleman JA. Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Cancer as Salvage Treatment Following Prior Radiation and Cryotherapy. Rev Urol 2018; 19:268-272. [PMID: 29472832 DOI: 10.3909/riu0755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Salvage treatment options after localized primary treatment failure of prostate cancer are limited and associated with risk for serious complications. We report on the management details of a 57-year-old African American man treated with partial-gland ablation using irreversible electroporation following local recurrence after brachytherapy and prior salvage cryoablation. Therapeutic and functional outcomes were assessed by conventional means, including serum prostate-specific antigen values and prostate biopsy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie S Murray
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri Columbia, MO
| | - Oguz Akin
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barqawi AB, Huebner E, Krughoff K, O'Donnell CI. Prospective Outcome Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Partial and Complete Cryoablation in Organ-confined Prostate Cancer. Urology 2018; 112:126-131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
19
|
Zhang Q, Zhang S, Zhang S, Wang W, Zhao X, Deng Y, Lian H, Guo H. Transperineal cryotherapy for unresectable muscle invasive bladder cancer: preliminary experience with 7 male patients. BMC Urol 2017; 17:81. [PMID: 28888228 PMCID: PMC5591566 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0270-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and urinary diversion (UD) is considered the standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In a part of patients, RC procedure is aborted due to unresectable disease, other followed treatment like systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy or cryotherapy may be a better option. The aim of present study was to report the preliminary results of transperineal cryotherapy for unresectable muscle invasive bladder cancer. METHODS From January 2011 to August 2013, 7 male patients with pT4b unresectable bladder cancer underwent bilateral ureterocutaneostomy. Two performed a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Then primary transperineal cryosurgery for preserved bladder at the guidance of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) was performed. All patients underwent a dual freeze-thaw cycle using third-generation cryotechnology with ultrathin 17-gauge cryoneedles. Computer tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance image (MRI)were performed at 3 month intervals after cryosurgery to determine whether progression or recurrence occurred. RESULTS All cryosurgery was performed successfully, mean operation time was 76.43 ± 25.12 min (range 50-120 min), mean blood loss was 19.29 ± 15.92 ml (range 5-50 ml). Mean hospital stay was 3.86 ± 1.68 day (range 2-7 days). No operative related deaths occurred. Four patients dead due to the metastasis disease at the follow up time of 8, 15, 18 and 37 months, respectively. Six patients received postoperative therapy, of whom 5 patients were treated with combined chemoradiation, and the other one received chemotherapy alone. The progression free survival (PFS) of the 7 patients was 22.00 ± 14.61 months (range 3-40 months). The one, two and three year overall survival (OS) was 85.7%, 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that cryosurgery combination with chemoradiotherapy provide a safe and effective alternative method for unresectable pT4b bladder cancer. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine the sustained efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiwei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Shun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaozhi Zhao
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongming Deng
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Huibo Lian
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hypothermie und ihr Einfluss auf das Tumorwachstum. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00398-016-0132-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Nicholson HL, Al-Hakeem Y, Maldonado JJ, Tse V. Management of bladder neck stenosis and urethral stricture and stenosis following treatment for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:S92-S102. [PMID: 28791228 PMCID: PMC5522805 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to examine all urethral strictures and stenoses subsequent to treatment for prostate cancer, including radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and cryotherapy. The overall majority respond to endoscopic treatment, including dilatation, direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) or bladder neck incision (BNI). There are adjunct treatments to endoscopic management, including injections of corticosteroids and mitomycin C (MMC) and urethral stents, which remain controversial and are not currently mainstay of treatment. Recalcitrant strictures are most commonly managed with urethroplasty, while recalcitrant stenosis is relatively rare yet almost always associated with bothersome urinary incontinence, requiring bladder neck reconstruction and subsequent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, or urinary diversion for the devastated outlet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L. Nicholson
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Yasser Al-Hakeem
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Vincent Tse
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, University of Sydney, Australia
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buethe JY, Abboud S, Brock K, Nizialek G, Rezaee R, Wasman J, Frankel J, Nakamoto DA. Percutaneous CT–Guided Cryoablation of the Salivary Glands in a Porcine Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27:1907-1912. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
23
|
McCammack KC, Raman SS, Margolis DJA. Imaging of local recurrence in prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2401-2415. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after therapy with curative intent currently depends primarily on biochemical serum analyses. When recurrence is suspected, further treatment decisions rely heavily on the confirmation of disease presence and determination of its extent. This is complicated by the fact that benign conditions can mimic biochemical recurrence, and serum studies do not reliably discriminate between local and distant recurrence. This review discusses the contemporary imaging paradigm for the evaluation of local PCa recurrence. The multidisciplinary implications for urologists, radiation oncologists and radiologists are examined. Emerging techniques and future directions of PCa imaging research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C McCammack
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Steven S Raman
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Daniel JA Margolis
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen ML, Correa AF, Santucci RA. Urethral Strictures and Stenoses Caused by Prostate Therapy. Rev Urol 2016; 18:90-102. [PMID: 27601967 DOI: 10.3909/riu0685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The number of patients with prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia is on the rise. As a result, the volume of prostate treatment and treatment-related complications is also increasing. Urethral strictures and stenoses are relatively common complications that require individualized management based on the length and location of the obstruction, and the patient's overall health, and goals of care. In general, less invasive options such as dilation and urethrotomy are preferred as first-line therapy, followed by more invasive substitution, flap, and anastomotic urethroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mang L Chen
- California Pacific Medical Center, Davies Campus San Francisco, CA
| | - Andres F Correa
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Richard A Santucci
- Michigan State College of Medicine, The Center for Urologic Reconstruction, Detroit Medical Center Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cryosurgery would be An Effective Option for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Sci Rep 2016; 6:27490. [PMID: 27271239 PMCID: PMC4895342 DOI: 10.1038/srep27490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cryosurgery (CS) has been used on patients with clinically localized PCa for more than 10 years. However, clinical studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety have reported conflicting results. This systematic assessment was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of CS compared with those of radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP), respectively. All controlled trials comparing CS with RT or RP and single-arm studies reporting results of CS therapy were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Ten publications from seven trials, with totally 1252 patients, were included in the meta-analysis, which revealed no significant differences in comparisons of CS vs RT and CS vs RP for overall survival and disease specific survival. However, a significantly lower disease-free survival could be observed for CS than RP. Moreover, a systematic review of literature focusing on comparative data of databases and materials of single-arm trials revealed satisfactory survival results in both primary and salvage CS. Our results showed that cryosurgery would be a relatively effective method for clinically localized prostate cancer with survival results comparable to radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. However, the large percentage of complications caused by cryosurgery should be carefully monitored.
Collapse
|
26
|
Shah TT, Ahmed H, Kanthabalan A, Lau B, Ghei M, Maraj B, Arya M. Focal cryotherapy of localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015; 14:1337-47. [PMID: 25367324 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.965687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Radical/whole gland treatment for prostate cancer has significant side-effects. Therefore focal treatments such as cryotherapy have been used to treat localized lesions whilst aiming to provide adequate cancer control with minimal side-effects. We performed a systematic review of Pubmed/Medline and Cochrane databases' to yield 9 papers for primary focal prostate cryotherapy and 2 papers for focal salvage treatment (radio-recurrent). The results of 1582 primary patients showed biochemical disease-free survival between 71-93% at 9-70 months follow-up. Incontinence rates were 0-3.6% and ED 0-42%. Recto-urethral fistula occurred in only 2 patients. Salvage focal cryotherapy had biochemical disease-free survival of 50-68% at 3 years. ED occurred in 60-71%. Focal cryotherapy appears to be an effective treatment for primary localized prostate cancer and compares favorably to radical/whole gland treatments in medium-term oncological outcomes and side-effects. Although more studies are needed it is also effective for radio-recurrent cancer with a low complications rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taimur Tariq Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
van Leeuwen MCE, Bulstra AEJ, van Leeuwen PAM, Niessen FB. A new argon gas-based device for the treatment of keloid scars with the use of intralesional cryotherapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67:1703-10. [PMID: 25257046 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2014] [Revised: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 08/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intralesional (IL) cryotherapy is a new promising technique for the treatment of keloid scars, in which the scar is frozen from inside. Multiple devices are available, mostly based on a simple liquid nitrogen Dewar system, which have a limited freezing capacity. Argon gas-based systems ensure accurate and highly controlled freezing and have shown to be effective within the field of oncologic surgery. However, this technique has never been used for the treatment of keloid scars. OBJECTIVE This prospective study evaluates an argon gas-based system for the treatment of keloids in a patient population including all Fitzpatrick skin types with a 1-year follow-up. METHODS Twenty-five patients with 30 keloid scars were included and treated with a device called Seednet (Galil Medical, Yokneam, Israel). Scar quality and possible scar recurrence were assessed before treatment and post treatment (6 and 12 months) with objective devices determining scar color, scar elasticity, scar volume, and patient's skin type. In addition, scars were evaluated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. RESULTS After 12 months, a significant volume reduction of 62% was obtained, p = 0.05. Moreover, complaints of pain and itching were alleviated and scar quality had improved according to the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Scar pigmentation recovered in 62% of all keloid scars within 12 months. Five out of 30 (17%) scars recurred within 12 months, three of which had previously been treated with liquid nitrogen-based IL cryotherapy. Both recurrent and persistent hypopigmentation were mainly seen in Afro-American patients. CONCLUSIONS IL cryotherapy with the use of an argon gas-based system proves to be effective in the treatment of keloid scars, yielding volume reduction and low recurrence rates. Although hypopigmentation recovered in most cases, it is strongly related to non-Caucasian patients. Finally, additional treatment of keloid scars previously unresponsive to IL cryotherapy is predisposed to a high recurrence rate. TRIAL NUMBER NCT02063243.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel C E van Leeuwen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne-Eva J Bulstra
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank B Niessen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|