Genetic Polymorphism and Expression of CXCR4 in Breast Cancer

Gene Variations of Chemokine and Chemokine Receptor CXCL12/CXCR4 in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer in the world and about 1 million people die from lung cancer every year in the world. Inflammation is an important factor in the onset, progression and metastasis of lung cancer. The most important regulators of inflammation are chemokines and chemokine receptors. Chemokines induce the proliferation of cancer cells and prevent their apoptosis. Chemokines may indirectly affect tumor growth by inducing growth and release of angiogenic factors from cells in the tumor microenvironment. CXCL12/CXCR4 are chemokine and chemokine receptors predicted to be involved in lung cancer pathogenesis. This study aimed to determine the relationship between CXCL12/CXCR4 gene variations and CXCL12 serum levels in disease pathogenesis in lung cancer. For this purpose, DNA samples isolated from 90 lung cancer patients (36 squamous cell carcinomas, 18 small cell carcinomas and 36 adenocarcinomas) and 90 control individuals were genotyped by PCR-RFLP method for CXCL12 (rs1801157) and CXCR4 (rs2228014). CXCL12 protein levels were determined from serum samples by the enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA) method. Results were evaluated using IBM SPSS Statistics 21 software and FINNETI program. As a result, there was no significant difference between the genotype frequencies of the CXCL12 rs1801157 variant and the risk of lung cancer (P = 0.396). CXCR4 rs2228014 genotypes were significantly associated with lung cancer risk (P < 0.001). Lung cancer patients had significantly elevated serum CXCL12 levels than controls (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the rs2228014 variants localized on the chemokine receptors CXCR4 gene was found to be closely related to lung cancer risk.

Molecular Characterization of CF33 Canine Cell Line and Evaluation of Its Ability to Respond against Infective Stressors in Sight of Anticancer Approaches

Simple Summary

Canine mammary cancer is very common and has many similarities with human breast cancer. Risk factors, physiological and pathological behaviors, and the clinical course in dogs are very similar to humans. Several molecular similarities have also been reported, such as overexpression of EGF, proliferation markers, metalloproteinase and cyclooxygenase, TP53 mutations, and CXCR4/SDF1 axis activation. These common characteristics make these breast tumors resistant to conventional therapies. It is therefore necessary to study therapeutic alternatives. Cell lines could be helpful to test in vitro immunomodulant anti-cancer therapies, allowing a reduction of laboratory animals’ involvement in the preliminary tests and achieving results in a shorter time. Although the canine mammary carcinoma cell line CF33 has been widely used in many studies on dog mammary cancer, characterization of its gene expression profile and of the influence of infective stressors of this cell line is poor. Our study shows the interaction of CF33 and Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) as an infective stressor, indicating that these cells may represent an in vitro model for assessing novel therapeutic approaches using bacteria.

Abstract

Spontaneous mammary tumors are the most frequent neoplasms in bitches and show similarities with human breast cancer in risk factors, clinical course, and histopathology. The poor prognosis of some cancer subtypes, both in human and dog, demands more effective therapeutic approaches. A possible strategy is the new anticancer therapy based on immune response modulation through bacteria or their derivatives on canine mammary carcinoma cell lines. The aim of the present study was to analyze the CF33 cell line in terms of basal expression of immune innate genes, CXCR4 expression, and interaction with infectious stressors. Our results highlight that CF33 maintains gene expression parameters typical of mammary cancer, and provides the basal gene expression of CF33, which is characterized by overexpression of CXCR4, CD44, RAD51, LY96, and a non-continuous expression of TP53 and PTEN. No mutations appeared in the CXCR4 gene until the 58th passage; this may represent important information for studying the CXCR4 pathway as a therapeutic target. Moreover, the CF33 cell line was shown to be able to interact with Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) (an infective stressor), indicating that these cells could be used as an in vitro model for developing innovative therapeutic approaches involving bacteria.

PET imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in patients with primary and recurrent breast carcinoma

Background

CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor frequently overexpressed in invasive breast cancer that has been shown to play a major role in signaling pathways involved in metastasis. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the diagnostic performance of CXCR4-directed PET imaging in patients with breast cancer using the recently introduced CXCR4-targeted PET probe ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor.

Results

Thirteen patients with first diagnosis of breast cancer, four patients with recurrent disease after primary breast cancer, and one patient with axillary lymph node metastasis of unknown primary underwent CXCR4-targeted PET imaging using ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background (T/B) ratios of tumor lesions were measured and compared with pathological prognostic factors and molecular subtypes. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images were available in 8/18 cases and were compared semi-quantitatively. Comparison with CXCR4 expression determined by immunohistochemistry was performed in 7/18 patients.

Nine of 13 primary breast cancers were visually detectable on ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor PET images (mean SUVmax of 3.0). The visually undetectable lesions included both cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and two cases of invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) without any hormone receptor and HER2 expression (triple negative). Metastases of recurrent breast cancer and unknown primary cancer were visually detectable in all five cases, exhibiting a mean SUVmax of 3.5. ¹⁸F-FDG PET demonstrated higher SUVmax in all patients compared to ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor PET. A correlation between SUVmax obtained from ⁶⁸Ga-Pentixafor PET and prognostic factors including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, proliferation index, tumor grade, or molecular subtypes was not observed.

Conclusions

CXCR4-directed PET imaging in patients with primary and recurrent breast cancer is feasible; however, tumor detectability is significantly lower compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Moreover, we did not find any correlation between aforementioned prognostic factors of breast cancer and CXCR4-targeted tracer accumulation. Based on these results in a small patient cohort, CXCR4-targeted PET imaging does not seem to be suitable as a general diagnostic tool for imaging of breast cancer. Future CXCR4 imaging studies should investigate whether this modality might be useful in more specific applications, e.g., in therapeutic approaches especially under the view of current developments in targeted immune cell and immune checkpoint inhibitory therapy.

CXCL12 chemokine and CXCR4 receptor: association with susceptibility and prognostic markers in triple negative breast cancer

CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling has been implicated in breast carcinogenesis, and genetic polymorphisms in these molecules have been associated with different types of cancer. The present study analyzed genetic polymorphisms in CXCL12 (rs1801157, G > A) and CXCR4 (rs2228014, C > T) and CXCR4 immunostaining in tumor tissues from patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) aiming to evaluate their possible role in its' susceptibility and prognosis. Genetic polymorphisms were analyzed in 59 TNBC patients and 150 control women; age-adjusted logistic regression showed no association when variants were considered in isolation; however, a statistically significant interaction was noted for heterozygosis for both allelic variants increasing the odds for TNBC (CXCL12-GA by CXCR4-CT: OR 7.23; 95% CI 1.15-45.41; p = 0.035). CXCL12 polymorphism was correlated negatively with proliferation index (Ki67) (Tau-b = - 0.406; p = 0.006). CXCR4 immunostaining was evaluated in 37 TNBC patients (22 with paired tumor-normal adjacent tissue). CXCR4 was detected more intensely in cell cytoplasm than in membrane, and was more expressed in tumor than in normal adjacent tissues, although not statistically significant. CXCR4 expression on the membrane of tumor cells was correlated positively with histopathological grade (Tau-b = 0.271; p = 0.036) and negatively with lymph node metastasis (Tau-b = - 0.478; p = 0.036). The present study indicates that CXCL12 and CXCR4 polymorphisms and CXCR4 immunostaining might have susceptibility and prognostic roles in TNBC pathogenesis.

An Investigation of SDF1/CXCR4 Gene Polymorphisms in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Family-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have a complex pathophysiology including genetic, inflammatory and neurodevelopmental components. We aim to investigate the relationship between ASD and gene polymorphisms of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and its receptor CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4), which may affect inflammatory and neurodevelopmental processes.

METHODS

101 children diagnosed with ASD aged 2-18 and their biological parents were included in the study. All participants were assessed using an information form and the Children were assessed using Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). SDF-1 G801→A and CXCR4 C13→T polymorphisms were detected by genetic techniques. The results were evaluated using the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) and haplotype relative risk (HRR).

RESULTS

Following TDT evaluation for CXCR4, the assumption of equality was not rejected (χ²=1.385, p=0.239). HRR for the C allele was 1.037 [HRR (95%CI)=0.937 (0.450-2.387), χ²=0.007, p=0.933] and HRR for the T allele was 0.965 [HRR (95%CI)=0.965 (0.419- 2.221), χ²=1.219, p=0.270], but the findings were statistically insignificant. Based on TDT evaluation for SDF1, the assumption of equality cannot be rejected (χ²=0, p=0.999). HRR for the A allele was 0.701 [HRR (95%CI)=0.701 (0.372-1.319), χ²=1.219, p=0.270] and HRR for the G allele was 1.427 [HRR (95%CI)=1.427 (0.758-2.686), χ²=1.219, p=0.270], but the findings were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

The genetic screening of blood samples from mother, father and child trios could not show a significant association between SDF1/CXCR4 genes and ASD on the basis of TDT and HRR tests. More extensive genetic studies are now needed to investigate the relationship between SDF1/CXCR4 gene polymorphisms and ASD.

Genetic variation of CXCR4 and risk of coronary artery disease: epidemiological study and functional validation of CRISPR/Cas9 system

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death worldwide, while coronary artery disease (CAD) account for a large part of CVDs. Vascular CXCR4 could limit atherosclerosis by maintaining arterial integrity. Here, we conducted a population-based, case-control study to evaluate the associations of common genetic variation within the CXCR4 gene (rs2228014, rs117600832, rs2471859, and rs2322864) with CAD risk in a Chinese population. We found that CXCR4 rs2228014 was significantly associated with 1.29-fold increased risk of CAD (A vs G: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.07–1.55; P = 0.007). The subjects with genotype AA (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.03–3.81; P = 0.041) and AG (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.02–1.58; P = 0.030) have higher risk of CAD, compared with those with genotype GG. Furthermore, both in the CAD patients with diabetes and those without diabetes, rs2228014 was significantly associated with increased risk of CAD (P < 0.05). Additionally, we also validated the significant association for rs2322864 (C vs T: OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.00–1.44; P = 0.046). Knockout of CXCR4 gene could significantly impair the capacity of cholesterol efflux (P < 0.01). These findings strongly suggest that CXCR4 polymorphisms might contribute to CAD susceptibility, and the exact biological mechanism awaits further research.

CXCR4 polymorphism predicts progression-free survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy

We analyzed associations between CXCR4/CXCL12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who underwent first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. A total of 874 patients were included in this study: 144 treated with bevacizumab and FOLFOX or XELOX (training cohort), 653 treated with bevacizumab and FOLFIRI or FOLFOXIRI (validation cohort A or B) and 77 treated with cetuximab- and oxaliplatin-based regimens (control cohort). One CXCR4 polymorphism (rs2228014) and two CXCL12 polymorphisms (rs1801157 and rs3740085) were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. Patients with a C/C genotype had a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those with any T allele (P=0.030) in the training cohort. Similarly, patients with the C/C genotype had a superior PFS in the validation cohorts, but not in the control cohort. Our findings suggest that a common genetic variant, CXCR4 rs2228014, could predict PFS and may guide therapeutic decisions in mCRC patients receiving first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.