Custom-Made Antibiotic Cement Nails in Orthopaedic Trauma: Review of Outcomes, New Approaches, and Perspectives

Antibiotic cement-coated rigid locked nails in infected femoral and tibial nonunion. Reoperation rates of commercial versus custom-made nails

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study is to assess bone union, infection control, and reoperation rates in a series of patients with infected femoral or tibial nonunion treated with antibiotic-cement-coated rigid nails and to compare the results obtained with custom-made nails versus commercial nails.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a series of consecutive patients with infected nonunion of the femur or the tibia treated with antibiotic-cement-coated rigid nails between January 2010 and 2020. We assessed patients' distinctive characteristics, initial injury, type of nail used (custom-made nail with vancomycin or commercial nail with gentamicin), success rate (bone union + infection control), reoperation rate, and failure rate. Comparative analyses were conducted between reoperated and non-reoperated patients regarding the type of nail used. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the risk variables that impacted reoperation rates.

RESULTS

We included 54 patients with 22 (40.74%) infected femoral nonunions and 32 (59.25%) tibial nonunions, who were treated with 38 (70.37%) custom-made antibiotic-cement coated nails and 16 (29.62%) commercial nails. Bone union and infection control were achieved in 51 (94.44%) cases. The reoperation rate was 40.74% (n = 22), and the failure rate was 5.55% (n = 3). The use of custom-made nails was associated with a higher risk of reoperation (Odds Ratio 4.71; 95% Confidence Interval 1.10 - 20.17; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic-cement-coated nails reached a 94.44% success rate. Nails manufactured in the OR coated with vancomycin cement were associated with a higher risk of reoperation than commercial nails loaded with gentamicin cement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III comparative, observational, non-randomized.

Comparison of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement coverage versus vacuum sealing drainage in semi-open bone grafting using for tibial fracture with infected bone and soft tissue defect: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare antibiotic-impregnated bone cement coverage (bone cement surface technique; BCS-T) versus vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) for tibial fracture with infected bone and soft tissue defect.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis compared the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing BCS-T (n = 16) versus VSD (n = 15) for tibial fracture with infected bone and soft tissue defect at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from March 2014 to August 2019. For BCS-T group, osseous cavity was filled with autograft bone graft after debridement, and then the wound was covered with a 3-mm layer of bone cement impregnated with vancomycin and gentamycin. The dressing was changed every day in the first week, and every 2 ~ 3 days in the second week. For VSD group, a negative pressure of -150 ~ -350 mmHg was maintained, and the dressing was changed every 5-7 days. All patients received antibiotics treatment based on bacterial culture results for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

The 2 groups did not differ in age, sex and key baseline characteristics, including type of Gustilo-Anderson classification, size of the bone and soft tissue defect, the percentage of primary debridement, bone transport, and the time from injury to bone grafting. The median follow-up was 18.9 months (range:12-40). The time to complete coverage of bone graft by granulation tissue was 21.2 (15.0-44.0) and 20.3 (15.0-24.0) days in the BCS-T and VSD groups, respectively (p = 0.412). The 2 groups also did not differ in wound healing time (3.3 (1.5-5.5) versus 3.2(1.5-6.5) months; p = 0.229) and bone defect healing time (5.4(3.0-9.6) versus 5.9(3.2-11.5) months; p = 0.402). However, the cost of covering material was significantly reduced in the BCS-T group (2071 ± 134 versus 5542 ± 905 yuan; p = 0.026). Paley functional classification at 12 months did not differ between the 2 groups (excellent in 87.5% versus 93.3% in the 2 groups; p = 0.306).

CONCLUSION

BCS-T could achieve clinical outcomes similar to VSD in patients receiving bone graft for tibial fracture with infected bone and soft tissue defect, but material cost was significantly reduced. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our finding.

The effectiveness of antibiotic cement-coated nails in post-traumatic femoral and tibial osteomyelitis - comparative analysis of custom-made versus commercially available nails

Background: The first objective of this retrospective study was to assess infection control rates in patients with chronic post-traumatic osteomyelitis (CPTO) of the femur or tibia treated with antibiotic cement-coated nails. The second objective was to compare the efficacy of custom-made nails versus commercially available antibiotic-coated nails in terms of infection control and need for reoperation. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of CPTO patients treated with antibiotic-coated nails who had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We recorded the characteristics of the initial injury, the type of nail used, cement–nail debonding, infecting microorganisms, operating time, infection control, need for reoperation, and failure rate. We performed a comparative analysis between nails manufactured in the operating room (i.e., custom-made) and those commercially available. Results: Thirty patients were included. The affected bones were the femur (n=15) and the tibia (n=15). Twenty-one of the 30 initial injuries were open fractures. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated microorganism (50 %). Sixteen patients were treated with custom-made nails and 14 with commercially available antibiotic-coated nails. At the time of extraction, four out of five custom-made antibiotic-coated nails experienced cement–bone debonding. Commercial nails were associated with shorter operating times (p<0.0001). The overall infection control rate was 96.66 %. Eight (26.66 %) patients needed reoperation. There was one failure (3.33 %) in the group treated with custom-made antibiotic-coated nails. We did not find significant differences between nail types in terms of reoperation, infection control, and failure rate. Conclusions: The use of antibiotic cement-coated nails proved useful in CPTO treatment. Commercially available nails had significantly shorter operating times and did not present cement–bone debonding during removal. Our results seem to indicate that both nail types are similar in terms of infection control and reoperation rates.

Antibiotic cement coating in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of reported clinical techniques

Background

Antibiotic-containing cement and bone graft substitute-coated orthopedic implants provide the advantages of simultaneous local antibiotic delivery and internal stable fixation, aiding in both infection eradication and osseous healing. Standardized protocols pertaining to implant coating techniques in various clinical and particularly intraoperative settings are scarce, and available literature is limited. This systematic review aims to provide a summary of the available current literature reporting on custom-made coating techniques of orthopedic implants, indications, outcomes, and associated complications in clinical use.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles reporting specifically on custom-made coating techniques of orthopedic implants in a clinical setting were eligible.

Results

A total of 41 articles with a cumulative total number of 607 cases were included. Indications for treatment mostly involved intramedullary infections after previous plate osteosynthesis or nailing. A variety of implants ranging from intramedullary nails, plates, wires, and rods served as metal cores for coating. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement was most commonly used, with vancomycin as the most frequently added antibiotic additive. Chest tubes and silicone tubes were most often used to mold. Common complications are cement debonding and breakage of the metallic implant.

Conclusion

Adequate coating techniques can reduce the burden of treatment and be associated with favorable outcomes. Lack of general consensus and heterogeneity in the reported literature indicate that the perfect all-in-one implant coating method is yet to be found. Further efforts to improve implant coating techniques are warranted.

Level of evidence

III.

Cement beads and cement spacers: indications, techniques, and clinical results

Objectives

To report our experience on the use of antibiotic coated nails (ACN) and cement beads for the management of bone infections.

Materials and methods

Infected nonunion (INU) cases were classified as: Type I (mild infection with no gap), Type II (moderate with good alignment, severe infection, gap <3 cm, no deformity), Type III (severe infection with gap ≥3 cm, deformity and limb shortening). Treatment involved either the insertion of ACN and cast (Type I), insertion of ACN, beads and external fixator (Type II), or Ilizarov methodology (Type III). A subset of 28 open fractures were admitted with severe contamination or delayed presentation with established infection and treated with debridement, ACN insertion, and antibiotic beads placed in soft tissue dead space areas.

Results

Results of 133 cases were classified excellent, good, and poor. Type I INU reported 40 excellent and 22 good results. Type II INU reported 28 (39%) excellent, 30 (43%) good, and 13 (18%) poor results. Poor results were due to uncontrolled infection and knee stiffness. Three patients required knee fusion and 1 required amputation. Fracture union was reported in 68 cases. Four of the 28 Gustilo grade III open fractures treated with ACN developed infected nonunion and had poor function caused by stiff knees.

Conclusions

An antibiotic impregnated cement nail (ACN) fills the dead space and elutes high concentrations of antibiotics providing some mechanical stability. We recommend the adjunct use of an ACN for the management of INU cases and for use in select cases of Gustilo grade III open fractures.

Coated nails: is their use supported by the literature?

Antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails have been popularized in recent decades for treating long-bone infections. They are especially useful in treating diaphyseal infections requiring stability, such as those involving fractures and nonunions. The nails are made by injecting antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate or "cement" around a metal core using a silicone tube as a mold. There are a variety of techniques that can be used to customize the nail to the affected site. Antibiotic cement has long been demonstrated as an effective local antibiotic delivery system. It is able to elute high concentrations of antibiotics while having little systemic toxicity. Several case series have reported good outcomes using this technique, defined by bone union and infection control. Further research is needed to determine the amount of weight that can safely be transferred through the nail and to optimize antibiotic elution.

Custom-Made Antibiotic Cement-Coated Nail for the Treatment of Infected Bone Defect

Background

Longbone infected bone defect remains a great challenge due to multiple surgeries, long-term treatment duration, and uncertain prognosis. Treatment principles include eradication/debridement, stabilization, and antibiotic administration. An antibiotic cement-coated nail has shown great prospects due to both local antibiotic elution and stabilization of bone defects. However, the current fabrication technique remains to be improved.

Methods

For the first time, we described a new method for custom-made cement-coated nail fabrication based on a 3D printing technique. A retrospective study of 19 consecutive patients with long bone infected bone defects from one medical center was conducted who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria from November 2016 to May 2020. The treatment involved thorough debridement, custom-made antibiotic cement-coated nail filling, and culture-specific systemic antibiotic treatment guided by a multidisciplinary team. Clinical and radiographic examinations (X-ray and CT scans) were used to evaluate bony union. Clinical and laboratory examinations were used to evaluate the infection control. The SF-36 score was used to evaluate patients' quality of life pre- and postoperatively.

Results

The mean follow-up was 98.8 weeks (ranging from 40 to 192). All cases achieved infection control, 3 cases achieved bone healing after one-stage operation, and 12 cases achieved bone healing after a two-stage bone graft procedure. At the last follow-up, none of the 19 patients had infection recurrence or 1 case had failure of the protective plate. The pre- and postoperative SF-36 score showed that there were statistical differences in all the 9 aspects.

Conclusions

The precise custom-made antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nail through the 3D printing technique used in this study is an effective strategy for the treatment of infected bone defects of long bone. This technique may help to increase the infection control rate and promote bone healing.

Antibiotic-Impregnated Intramedullary Cement Nail-Induced Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis and Septic Shock: A Case Report

CASE

A 28-year-old woman with an infected proximal femur nonunion was treated with an antibiotic-coated intramedullary nail. Shortly after discharge, the patient presented to the emergency department and was readmitted with a morbilliform rash sparing the left lower extremity. She became hemodynamically unstable, despite cessation of intravenous antibiotics, requiring transfer to the intensive care unit and urgent removal of her antibiotic nail. She improved after surgery, and biopsy results from the rash confirmed acute generalized examthematous pustulosis.

CONCLUSION

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is a rare, dermatologic crisis that can be precipitated by antibiotics, even in the form of antibiotic cement.

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Local Antimicrobial Strategies and Dead Space Management in Fracture-Related Infection

Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a challenging complication that imposes a heavy burden on orthopaedic trauma patients. The surgical management eradicates the local infectious focus and if necessary facilitates bone healing. Treatment success is associated with debridement of all dead and poorly vascularized tissue. However, debridement is often associated with the formation of a dead space, which provides an ideal environment for bacteria and is a potential site for recurrent infection. Dead space management is therefore of critical importance. For this reason, the use of locally delivered antimicrobials has gained attention not only for local antimicrobial activity but also for dead space management. Local antimicrobial therapy has been widely studied in periprosthetic joint infection, without addressing the specific problems of FRI. Furthermore, the literature presents a wide array of methods and guidelines with respect to the use of local antimicrobials. The present review describes the scientific evidence related to dead space management with a focus on the currently available local antimicrobial strategies in the management of FRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intramedullary reaming modality for management of postoperative long bone infection: a prospective randomized controlled trial in 44 patients

Background

Studies addressing the management of intramedullary infection are mainly retrospective and with a limited number of cases. Reaming can be performed using either conventional reaming or using the reamer/irrigator/aspirator (RIA) system. Until now there have been no comparative prospective studies between these two methods. We aimed to compare the efficacy of RIA with conventional reaming followed by insertion of antibiotic-loaded cement, for the treatment of intramedullary nail infection of long bones. We assessed the rate of remission between groups after two-year follow-up and identified microorganisms using tissue cultures and sonication of explanted intramedullary nail (IMN).

Methods

A noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was carried out between August 2013 and August 2015 involving 44 patients of whom a locked IMN implant of the femur and/or tibia was retrieved and who all met the clinical and radiological criteria for IMN-associated osteomyelitis. Patients were randomized into two groups: RIA alone versus conventional reaming followed by antibiotic-loaded cement insertion. Both groups also underwent six-weeks of antibiotic treatment according to the results of the antibiogram. Patients were evaluated after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months for radiological and clinical follow-up.

Results

After 24 months, the rate of infection remission was similar between the two groups, 87% in the RIA group and 95.5% in the conventional reaming group (p = 0.60). Among four patients who had recurrence of infection, the time to reappearance of symptoms varied from 20 days to twenty-two months. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci were isolated in 23 (40.4%) and 13 (22.9%) patients, respectively. Interestingly, we identified 20% (9/45) of polymicrobial infection.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the RIA system alone, is noninferior to conventional reaming followed by antibiotic cement spacer in the treatment of IMN infection. However, RIA shows greater efficacy in the collection of infected medullary bone tissue, mainly in cases of infected retrograde nail of the femur.

Trial registration

ISRCTN82233198. Retroactively registered on July 29, 2019.

Commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered locking nails for the treatment of fracture-related infections - A retrospective case analysis of 10 cases

Introduction: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) are a devastating complication. FRIs are challenging and should be addressed with a multidisciplinary approach. An FRI should be addressed surgically by non-viable bone debridement, local antibiotic deposition, minimization of dead space and fracture stabilization. Antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered nails are a viable option to face these complications. To demonstrate the safety and utility of commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered nails, we performed a review of the cases operated in our institution and a cost analysis to compare the cost of a commercial nail to other available alternatives.

Material and methods: We designed a retrospective study of consecutive cases to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered commercial nails and designed a cost analysis of commercial coated nails compared to other custom-made alternatives.

Results: We treated seven tibias and three femurs. Nine patients fully fit the criteria for FRI. There was one case of reintervention because of persistent drainage. All fractures healed, and in the first year post-intervention, there were no signs or symptoms of infection. There were no complications related to the commercially available nail that was used. There is a small increase in the direct quantifiable cost in commercially available nails, but non-quantifiable cost should be assessed individually.

Conclusions: Commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered nails are a safe and useful treatment option for complicated cases of lower limb long bone reconstruction. The low complication rate and the straightforward technique compensate for the direct cost increase in most situations.

Infection after fracture fixation: Current surgical and microbiological concepts

One of the most challenging complications in trauma surgery is infection after fracture fixation (IAFF). IAFF may result in permanent functional loss or even amputation of the affected limb in patients who may otherwise be expected to achieve complete, uneventful healing. Over the past decades, the problem of implant related bone infections has garnered increasing attention both in the clinical as well as preclinical arenas; however this has primarily been focused upon prosthetic joint infection (PJI), rather than on IAFF. Although IAFF shares many similarities with PJI, there are numerous critical differences in many facets including prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Admittedly, extrapolating data from PJI research to IAFF has been of value to the trauma surgeon, but we should also be aware of the unique challenges posed by IAFF that may not be accounted for in the PJI literature. This review summarizes the clinical approaches towards the diagnosis and treatment of IAFF with an emphasis on the unique aspects of fracture care that distinguish IAFF from PJI. Finally, recent developments in anti-infective technologies that may be particularly suitable or applicable for trauma patients in the future will be briefly discussed.

The Antibiotic Nail in the Treatment of Long Bone Infection: Technique and Results

Antibiotic cement nails provide a useful and relatively simple technique to treat intramedullary osteomyelitis of the long bones. These devices provide stability as well as local, targeted antibiotics, which are both critical aspects of osteomyelitis management. Additionally, the use of a threaded core is a critical component of successful cement nail assembly. With adherence to the simple principles outlined in this review, surgeons can expect reliably good results using these drug-delivery implants.

The use of Reamer-irrigator-aspirator in the management of long bone osteomyelitis: an update

Purpose

Reamer–irrigator–aspirator (RIA) is an innovative device that its indications have recently been expanded to the management of long bone infections.

Methods

In this narrative review, we summarise the most important studies in the field and we present the current open questions pertaining to the use of RIA in the management of osteomyelitis of long bones.

Results

The relevant literature is sparse and low quality. Nevertheless, the use of RIA for infected cases has yielded promising outcomes in specialised centres. Technical aspects that merit special attention in osteomyelitis of long bones are its inapplicability in small diameter long bones, the inadequate debridement of wide metaphyseal areas and the potential bleeding sequelae. The use of RIA in open fracture management to reduce infection risk has not gained acceptance. The antibiotic impregnated nails and rods constitute a complimentary strategy for the management of infections.

Conclusions

The use of RIA for the management of long bone infections is an innovative and promising strategy. High quality studies are needed to shed light in its efficacy compared to conventional methods of management of osteomyelitis of long bones.