Discharge against Medical Advice in Surgical Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Case Report Series Illustrating Unique Challenges

A 15-year review of characteristics and outcomes of patients leaving against medical advice

PURPOSE

Discharging against medical advice can have significant, detrimental effects on burn patient outcomes as well as higher hospital readmission rates and healthcare expenditures. The goal of this study is to identify characteristics of patients who left against medical advice and suggest solutions to mitigate these factors. Data were collected at our American Burn Association verified Burn Unit over a 15-year period.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2022, 37 patients were identified as having left against medical advice from the burn unit. The average patient age was 37 years old with 64.9% being male, and 70.2% were identified as having a substance abuse history. The majority (51.4%) had Medicaid or State health insurance, 29.7% had no insurance, and 18.9% had private insurance. The mechanism of injury was most commonly frostbite (43.2%). The majority sustained < 1% total body surface area injuries. Most (83.7%) had social work and/or case management involved during their admission, and all (100%) had their involvement if the length of admission was greater than one day. Over half (59.5%) returned to the ED within 2 weeks with complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that patients discharging against medical advice from the burn unit suffered from smaller injuries, often due to cold related injuries. These patients had comorbid substance abuse or psychiatric histories, and the majority had Medicaid or state health insurance. Recruiting interdisciplinary care members, including social work, psychiatry, and addiction medicine, early may help these patients by encouraging completion of their hospital care and setting up crucial follow-up care.

A step-by-step approach to patients leaving against medical advice (AMA) in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

Patients leaving against medical advice (AMA) can be distressing for emergency physicians trying to navigate the medical, social, psychological, and legal ramifications of the situation in a fast-paced and chaotic environment. To guide physicians in fulfilling their obligation of care, we aimed to synthesize the best approaches to patients leaving AMA.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review across various fields of work, research context and methodology to synthesize the most relevant strategies for emergency physicians attending patients leaving AMA. We searched Medline, CINAHL, PSYCHO Legal Source, PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA, Psychological and Behavioural Sciences collection, SocIndex and Scopus. Search strategies included controlled vocabulary (i.e., MESH) and keywords relevant to the subject chosen by a team of four people, including two specialized librarians.

RESULTS

The literature review included 34 relevant papers about approaches to patients leaving AMA: 8 case presentations, 4 ethical case analyses, 10 legal letters, 4 reviews and 8 original studies. The main identified strategies were prioritizing a patient-centered approach, proposing alternative discharge and reducing harm while properly documenting the encounter.

CONCLUSION

A systematic approach to patients leaving AMA could help improve patient care, support physicians and decrease stigmatization of this population. We advocate that emergency physicians should receive training on how to approach patients leaving AMA to limit the impact on this vulnerable population.