1
|
Lin J, Liu H, Liang S, Luo L, Guan S, Wu S, Liu Y, Xu S, Yan R, Xu E. Microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases with ultrasound fusion imaging assistance: a stratified analysis study based on tumor size and location. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:400-408. [PMID: 39090260 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04508-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of ultrasound fusion imaging-assisted microwave ablation (MWA) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) based on stratified analysis of tumor size and location. METHODS Patients with CRLM who underwent ultrasound fusion imaging-assisted MWA in our hospital between February 2020 and February 2023 were enrolled into this retrospective study. Ultrasound fusion imaging was used for detection, guidance, monitoring and immediate evaluation throughout the MWA procedures. Technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic progression and overall survival (OS) were recorded and analyzed. The subgroup analysis of intrahepatic progression of MWA for CRLM was performed according to tumor size and location. RESULTS A total of 51 patients with 122 nodules were enrolled. Both technical success and technique efficacy were acquired in all nodules. In a median follow-up period of 19 months, 2.5% of the nodules (3/122) were observed LTP. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative intrahepatic progression rates were 38.7% and 52.1% respectively. Patients were divided into subgroups according to tumor size (≥ 30 mm, n = 13; < 30 mm, n = 38) and tumor location (perivascular, n = 20; non-perivascular, n = 31 and subcapsular, n = 36; non-subcapsular, n = 15). The cumulative intrahepatic progression rates were similar between the subgroups regarding tumor size and perivascular location, while significantly higher in the subcapsular group than in the non-subcapsular group (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION Ultrasound fusion imaging-assisted MWA exhibited satisfactory local efficacy for CRLM, especially for non-subcapsular tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Lin
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Huahui Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shuang Liang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Liping Luo
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sainan Guan
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shanshan Wu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shuxian Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ronghua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, NO.1120 Lianhua Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Erjiao Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Konstantinoff K, Fraum TJ. Beyond the AJR: Liver MRI Alters Treatment Plans in Select Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 223:e2431006. [PMID: 38380853 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.24.31006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Konstantinoff
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 501 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 501 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dempsey PJ, Farrelly C, Cronin CG, Fenlon HM. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1602-1618. [PMID: 39078288 PMCID: PMC11417391 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has transformed over the past 2 decades. Advances in surgical techniques, systemic therapies, and local treatments have resulted in a paradigm shift. Disease that would once have been considered terminal is now frequently treated aggressively with both a disease-free and overall survival benefit. In line with the expanding range of treatment options, there has been an increase in the volume and complexity of imaging required in the management of these patients to ensure optimal patient selection and outcome. The radiologist plays a pivotal role in interpreting these studies, conveying the relevant information and informing the discussion at multidisciplinary team meetings. The purpose of this review is to provide an update for radiologists on the current surgical management of patients with CRLM highlighting specific imaging information that is required by the multidisciplinary team when assessing resectability and/or the need for additional liver-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Dempsey
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Cormac Farrelly
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Carmel G Cronin
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Helen M Fenlon
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leigh N, Hammill CW. Liver ultrasound: Normal anatomy and pathologic findings. Surg Open Sci 2024; 19:178-198. [PMID: 38800120 PMCID: PMC11127201 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The goal of this article is to give an overview of intraoperative liver ultrasound, including the indications, different ultrasound techniques, and the ultrasound appearance of normal anatomy, more common anatomic variations, and common hepatic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Leigh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Chet W. Hammill
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Araujo RLC, Fonseca LG, Silva RO, Linhares MM, Uson Junior PLS. Molecular profiling and patient selection for the multimodal approaches for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:273-292. [PMID: 38617479 PMCID: PMC11007353 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-22-616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer represents the third most common cancer and about 20% are diagnosed with synchronous metastatic disease. From a historical point of view, surgery remains the mainstream treatment for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Furthermore, disease outcomes are improving due significant advances in systemic treatments and diagnostic methods. However, the optimal timing for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery for CRLM has not yet been established and remains an open question. Thus, patient selection combining image workouts, time of recurrence, positive lymph nodes, and molecular biomarkers can improve the decision-making process. Nevertheless, molecular profiling is rising as a promising field to be incorporated in the multimodal approach and guide patient selection and sequencing of treatment. Tumor biomakers, genetic profiling, and circulating tumor DNA have been used to offer as much personalized treatment as possible, based on the precision oncology concept of tailored care rather than a guideline-based therapy. This review article discusses the role of molecular pathology and biomarkers as prognostic and predictor factors in the diagnosis and treatment of resectable CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael L. C. Araujo
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Hospital e Maternidade Brasil—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Santo André, SP, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leonardo G. Fonseca
- Hospital e Maternidade Brasil—Rede D’Or São Luiz, Santo André, SP, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Raphael Oliveira Silva
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Ministro Costa Cavalcanti, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil
| | | | - Pedro L. S. Uson Junior
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Görgec B, Verpalen IM, Sijberden JP, Abu Hilal M, Bipat S, Verhoef C, Swijnenburg RJ, Besselink MG, Stoker J. Added Value of Liver MRI in Patients Eligible for Surgical Resection or Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Based on CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e401. [PMID: 38883954 PMCID: PMC11175892 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging modality for detection and staging in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in detecting small lesions, guidelines are ambiguous regarding the added value of an additional liver MRI in the surgical workup of patients with CRLM. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical added value of liver MRI in patients eligible for resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT. Methods A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through June 23, 2023. Studies investigating the impact of additional MRI on local treatment plan following CT in patients with CRLM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled weighted proportions for the primary outcome were calculated using random effect meta-analysis. Results Overall, 11 studies with 1440 patients were included, of whom 468 patients (32.5%) were assessed for change in local treatment plan. Contrast-enhanced liver MRI was used in 10 studies, including gadoxetic acid in 9 studies. Liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging was used in 8 studies. Pooling of data found a 24.12% (95% confidence interval, 15.58%-32.65%) change in the local treatment plan based on the added findings of liver MRI following CT. Sensitivity analysis including 5 studies (268 patients) focusing on monophasic portal venous CT followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging showed a change of local treatment plan of 17.88% (95% confidence interval, 5.14%-30.62%). Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis found that liver MRI changed the preinterventional local treatment plan in approximately one-fifth of patients eligible for surgical resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT. These findings suggest a clinically relevant added value of routine liver MRI in the preinterventional workup of CRLM, which should be confirmed by large prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inez M. Verpalen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper P. Sijberden
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Shandra Bipat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Görgec B, Hansen IS, Kemmerich G, Syversveen T, Abu Hilal M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Burgmans MC, Cappendijk VC, D'Hondt M, Edwin B, van Erkel AR, Gielkens HAJ, Grünhagen DJ, Gobardhan PD, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Kint PAM, Kuhlmann K, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, Lutin B, Maas M, Marsman HA, Meijerink M, Meyer Y, Morone M, Peringa J, Sijberden JP, van Delden OM, van den Bergh JE, Vanhooymissen IJS, Vermaas M, Willemssen FEJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bossuyt PM, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Stoker J. MRI in addition to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): an international, multicentre, prospective, diagnostic accuracy trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:137-146. [PMID: 38081200 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines are inconclusive on whether contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetic acid and diffusion-weighted imaging should be added routinely to CT in the investigation of patients with colorectal liver metastases who are scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation, or both. Although contrast-enhanced MRI is reportedly superior than contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterisation of colorectal liver metastases, its effect on clinical patient management is unknown. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI on local treatment plan in patients with colorectal liver metastases amenable to local treatment, based on contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS We did an international, multicentre, prospective, incremental diagnostic accuracy trial in 14 liver surgery centres in the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histological proof of colorectal cancer, a WHO performance status score of 0-4, and primary or recurrent colorectal liver metastases, who were scheduled for local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. All patients had contrast-enhanced CT and liver contrast-enhanced MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid as a contrast agent before undergoing local therapy. The primary outcome was change in the local clinical treatment plan (decided by the individual clinics) on the basis of liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings, analysed in the intention-to-image population. The minimal clinically important difference in the proportion of patients who would have change in their local treatment plan due to an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI was 10%. This study is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NL8039. FINDINGS Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 31, 2021, 325 patients with colorectal liver metastases were assessed for eligibility. 298 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat population, including 177 males (59%) and 121 females (41%) with planned local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. A change in the local treatment plan based on liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings was observed in 92 (31%; 95% CI 26-36) of 298 patients. Changes were made for 40 patients (13%) requiring more extensive local therapy, 11 patients (4%) requiring less extensive local therapy, and 34 patients (11%) in whom the indication for curative-intent local therapy was revoked, including 26 patients (9%) with too extensive disease and eight patients (3%) with benign lesions on liver contrast-enhanced MRI (confirmed by a median follow-up of 21·0 months [IQR 17·5-24·0]). INTERPRETATION Liver contrast-enhanced MRI should be considered in all patients scheduled for local treatment for colorectal liver metastases on the basis of contrast-enhanced CT imaging. FUNDING The Dutch Cancer Society and Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S Hansen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunter Kemmerich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hugo A J Gielkens
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter A M Kint
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Bart Lutin
- Department of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yannick Meyer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Morone
- Department of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jan Peringa
- Department of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Inge J S Vanhooymissen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Banerjee A, Hariharan D. History of liver surgery. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2024; 23:e0237. [PMID: 38919867 PMCID: PMC11199012 DOI: 10.1097/cld.0000000000000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
|
9
|
Marcellinaro R, Spoletini D, Grieco M, Avella P, Cappuccio M, Troiano R, Lisi G, Garbarino GM, Carlini M. Colorectal Cancer: Current Updates and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2023; 13:40. [PMID: 38202047 PMCID: PMC10780254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a frequent neoplasm in western countries, mainly due to dietary and behavioral factors. Its incidence is growing in developing countries for the westernization of foods and lifestyles. An increased incidence rate is observed in patients under 45 years of age. In recent years, the mortality for CRC is decreased, but this trend is slowing. The mortality rate is reducing in those countries where prevention and treatments have been implemented. The survival is increased to over 65%. This trend reflects earlier detection of CRC through routine clinical examinations and screening, more accurate staging through advances in imaging, improvements in surgical techniques, and advances in chemotherapy and radiation. The most important predictor of survival is the stage at diagnosis. The screening programs are able to reduce incidence and mortality rates of CRC. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of incidence, mortality, and survival rate for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Marcellinaro
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Domenico Spoletini
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Michele Grieco
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (P.A.); (M.C.)
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, 81030 Caserta, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (P.A.); (M.C.)
| | - Raffaele Troiano
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Giorgio Lisi
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Giovanni M. Garbarino
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Massimo Carlini
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horkaew P, Chansangrat J, Keeratibharat N, Le DC. Recent advances in computerized imaging and its vital roles in liver disease diagnosis, preoperative planning, and interventional liver surgery: A review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2382-2397. [PMID: 38111769 PMCID: PMC10725533 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The earliest and most accurate detection of the pathological manifestations of hepatic diseases ensures effective treatments and thus positive prognostic outcomes. In clinical settings, screening and determining the extent of a pathology are prominent factors in preparing remedial agents and administering appropriate therapeutic procedures. Moreover, in a patient undergoing liver resection, a realistic preoperative simulation of the subject-specific anatomy and physiology also plays a vital part in conducting initial assessments, making surgical decisions during the procedure, and anticipating postoperative results. Conventionally, various medical imaging modalities, e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, have been employed to assist in these tasks. In fact, several standardized procedures, such as lesion detection and liver segmentation, are also incorporated into prominent commercial software packages. Thus far, most integrated software as a medical device typically involves tedious interactions from the physician, such as manual delineation and empirical adjustments, as per a given patient. With the rapid progress in digital health approaches, especially medical image analysis, a wide range of computer algorithms have been proposed to facilitate those procedures. They include pattern recognition of a liver, its periphery, and lesion, as well as pre- and postoperative simulations. Prior to clinical adoption, however, software must conform to regulatory requirements set by the governing agency, for instance, valid clinical association and analytical and clinical validation. Therefore, this paper provides a detailed account and discussion of the state-of-the-art methods for liver image analyses, visualization, and simulation in the literature. Emphasis is placed upon their concepts, algorithmic classifications, merits, limitations, clinical considerations, and future research trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramate Horkaew
- School of Computer Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Jirapa Chansangrat
- School of Radiology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Nattawut Keeratibharat
- School of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Doan Cong Le
- Faculty of Information Technology, An Giang University, Vietnam National University (Ho Chi Minh City), An Giang 90000, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang JW, Huang SH, Qin JM. Clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022; 30:897-913. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v30.i20.897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system in clinical practice. Due to the anatomical characteristics of the colorectum itself, colorectal cancer is prone to liver metastasis. Approximately 15%-25% of colorectal cancer cases are complicated with liver metastasis at diagnosis, 15%-25% are complicated with liver metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer, and 80%-90% with liver metastasis cannot undergo radical resection initially. The 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, and liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the clinical application of effective chemotherapy and molecular targeted drugs, as well as the rapid development of surgical techniques, an individualized safe, efficient, fast, treatment plan can be formulated according to patients' age, primary colorectal tumor location, degree of differentiation, Ras and B-Raf gene status, tumor size, number and distribution of metastases in the liver. By shrinking the tumor volume in the liver and increasing the residual liver volume, liver metastatic tumors can undergo surgical resection or disease-free status can be achieved in patients with liver metastasis. As a result, patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve a 5-year survival rate of 30%-57%, which greatly improves the prognosis after operation. According to the postoperative adverse factors, individualized preventive measures are worked out to reduce the impact of adverse factors and improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases. In this paper, we systematically discuss the clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases by reviewing the relevant domestic and foreign literature, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the selection of clinical treatment and program for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Wei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - Sun-Hua Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - Jian-Min Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vaz da Silva DG, Bredt LC, Diniz AL, Vieira VHR, Fernandes PHS, Ribeiro R, Ribeiro HSC, Oliveira AF. Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology surgical standards for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:28-36. [PMID: 35689577 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has become complex because of the increasing availability of medical, radiological, and surgical treatment options applied either alone or in combination. However, resection remains the only evidence-based curative therapy. These Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology surgical standards are intended to guide clinicians in the decision-making process for modern surgical management of CRLM within a multidisciplinary team in an evidence-based framework, focusing on resectable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego G Vaz da Silva
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mário Covas State Hospital, Centro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luis C Bredt
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Alessandro L Diniz
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Upper GI and HPB Surgical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Victor H R Vieira
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Rede D'Or São Luiz, Hospital Federal de Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Paulo H S Fernandes
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Héber S C Ribeiro
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Upper GI and HPB Surgical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre F Oliveira
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer, Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Giannone F, Felli E, Cherkaoui Z, Mascagni P, Pessaux P. Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246268. [PMID: 34944887 PMCID: PMC8699460 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence makes surgical resection easier and safer, and, at the same time, can improve oncological results. The robotic system fits perfectly with these more or less diffused technologies, and it seems that this benefit is mutual. In liver surgery, robotic systems help surgeons to localize tumors and improve surgical results with well-defined preoperative planning or increased intraoperative detection. Furthermore, they can balance the absence of tactile feedback and help recognize intrahepatic biliary or vascular structures during parenchymal transection. Some of these systems are well known and are already widely diffused in open and laparoscopic hepatectomies, such as indocyanine green fluorescence or ultrasound-guided resections, whereas other tools, such as Augmented Reality, are far from being standardized because of the high complexity and elevated costs. In this paper, we review all the experiences in the literature on the use of artificial intelligence systems in robotic liver resections, describing all their practical applications and their weaknesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Giannone
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Zineb Cherkaoui
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
| | - Pietro Mascagni
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (F.G.); (E.F.); (Z.C.)
- Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, Inserm U1110, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
- University Hospital Institute (IHU), Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, University of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-369-550-552
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xu YW, Fu H. Application of intraoperative ultrasound in liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2021; 20:501-502. [PMID: 34417143 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Wei Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing 312000, China
| | - Hong Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing 312000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rocca A, Cipriani F, Belli G, Berti S, Boggi U, Bottino V, Cillo U, Cescon M, Cimino M, Corcione F, De Carlis L, Degiuli M, De Paolis P, De Rose AM, D'Ugo D, Di Benedetto F, Elmore U, Ercolani G, Ettorre GM, Ferrero A, Filauro M, Giuliante F, Gruttadauria S, Guglielmi A, Izzo F, Jovine E, Laurenzi A, Marchegiani F, Marini P, Massani M, Mazzaferro V, Mineccia M, Minni F, Muratore A, Nicosia S, Pellicci R, Rosati R, Russolillo N, Spinelli A, Spolverato G, Torzilli G, Vennarecci G, Viganò L, Vincenti L, Delrio P, Calise F, Aldrighetti L. The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1247-1265. [PMID: 34089501 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01100-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
At the time of diagnosis synchronous colorectal cancer, liver metastases (SCRLM) account for 15-25% of patients. If primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases are resectable, good results may be achieved performing surgical treatment incorporated into the chemotherapy regimen. So far, the possibility of simultaneous minimally invasive (MI) surgery for SCRLM has not been extensively investigated. The Italian surgical community has captured the need and undertaken the effort to establish a National Consensus on this topic. Four main areas of interest have been analysed: patients' selection, procedures, techniques, and implementations. To establish consensus, an adapted Delphi method was used through as many reiterative rounds were needed. Systematic literature reviews were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses instructions. The Consensus took place between February 2019 and July 2020. Twenty-six Italian centres participated. Eighteen clinically relevant items were identified. After a total of three Delphi rounds, 30-tree recommendations reached expert consensus establishing the herein presented guidelines. The Italian Consensus on MI surgery for SCRLM indicates possible pathways to optimise the treatment for these patients as consensus papers express a trend that is likely to become shortly a standard procedure for clinical pictures still on debate. As matter of fact, no RCT or relevant case series on simultaneous treatment of SCRLM are available in the literature to suggest guidelines. It remains to be investigated whether the MI technique for the simultaneous treatment of SCRLM maintain the already documented benefit of the two separate surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
- Center for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy.
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Belli
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Berti
- Department of Surgery, Hospital S Andrea La Spezia, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bottino
- Department of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS AOU Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cimino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Division of General Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Degiuli
- Department of Oncology, Digestive and Surgical Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, University of Torino, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Paolo De Paolis
- General Surgery Department, Ospedale Gradenigo, Turin, Italy
| | - Agostino Maria De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ettorre
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, San Camillo-Forlanini General Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Filauro
- General and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Abdominal Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Unit of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, GB Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Divisions of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Laurenzi
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Marini
- The Department of General and Emergency Surgery, San Camillo-Forlanini Regional Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, San Camillo-Forlanini General Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Minni
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Muratore
- General Surgery Unit, E. Agnelli Hospital, Pinerolo, TO, Italy
| | - Simone Nicosia
- Department of Surgery, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Pellicci
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastroenterology Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Giovanni Vennarecci
- Laparoscopic, Hepatic, and Liver Transplant Unit, AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Leonardo Vincenti
- Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology-Abdominal Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Center for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Osei-Bordom DC, Kamarajah S, Christou N. Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases and Biotherapies. Biomedicines 2021; 9:894. [PMID: 34440099 PMCID: PMC8389538 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9080894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the deadliest causes of death by cancer worldwide. Its first main metastatic diffusion spreads to the liver. Different mechanisms such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis are the characteristics of this invasion. At this stage, different options are possible and still in debate, especially regarding the use of targeted therapeutics and biotherapies. (2) Methods: A review of the literature has been done focusing on the clinical management of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer and the contribution of biotherapies in this field. (3) Results: In a clinical setting, surgeons and oncologists consider liver metastasis in CRC into two groups to launch adapted therapeutics: resectable and non-resectable. Around these two entities, the combination of targeted therapies and biotherapies are of high interest and are currently tested to know in which molecular and clinical conditions they have to be applied to impact positively both on survival and quality of life of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel-Clement Osei-Bordom
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; (D.-C.O.-B.); (S.K.)
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Centre for Liver and Gastroenterology Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sivesh Kamarajah
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; (D.-C.O.-B.); (S.K.)
| | - Niki Christou
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; (D.-C.O.-B.); (S.K.)
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
- EA3842 CAPTuR Laboratory “Cell Activation Control, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance”, Faculty of Medicine, 2 Rue du Docteur Marcland, 87025 Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
D'Silva M, Cho JY, Han HS, Yerlan T, Yoon YS, Lee HW, Lee JS, Lee B, Kim M. Management of indeterminate hepatic nodules and evaluation of factors predicting their malignant potential in patients with colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13744. [PMID: 34215816 PMCID: PMC8253834 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93339-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Some liver nodules remain indeterminate despite hepatocyte-specific contrast MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Our objective was to study the natural course and evaluate possible treatment strategies for indeterminate nodules. We retrospectively evaluated patients in whom MRI revealed 'indeterminate' or 'equivocal' nodules between January 2008 and October 2018. Patients were followed up until October 2019 or until death (median, 18 months; (1-130 months)). The incidence of patients with indeterminate nodules on MRI was 15.4% (60 of 389). The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative ultrasound for detecting indeterminate nodules were 73.68% and 93.75%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 96.6%. Over half of the patients followed up had benign nodules (58.8%). By comparing characteristics of patients with benign or malignant nodules in the follow up group, the ratio of positive lymph nodes to total number of lymph nodes resected (pLNR) was significantly greater in patients with malignant nodules (P = 0.006). Intraoperative ultrasound could be considered as an adjunct to MRI in patients with indeterminate nodules owing to its high positive predictive value. The pLNR could be used to help select which patients can undergo conservative therapy, at least in metachronous CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Taupyk Yerlan
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Moonhwan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Di Donato V, Giannini A, D'Oria O, Schiavi MC, Di Pinto A, Fischetti M, Lecce F, Perniola G, Battaglia F, Berloco P, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P. Hepatobiliary Disease Resection in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Role and Optimal Cytoreduction. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:222-230. [PMID: 32779050 PMCID: PMC7752869 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08989-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety in terms of prognostic significance and perioperative morbidity and mortality of cytoreduction in patients affected by advance ovarian cancer and hepato-biliary metastasis. Methods Patients with a least one hepatobiliary metastasis who have undergone surgical treatment with curative intent of were considered for the study. Perioperative complications were evaluated and graded with Accordion severity Classification. Five-year PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve. Results Sixty-seven (20.9%) patients had at least one metastasis to the liver, biliary tract, or porta hepatis. Forty-four (65.7%) and 23 (34.3%) patients underwent respectively high and intermediate complexity surgery according. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 48 (71.6%) patients with hepato-biliary disease. In two patients (2.9%) severe complications related to hepatobiliary surgery were reported. The median PFS for the patients with hepato-biliary involvement (RT = 0 vs. RT > 0) was 19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.2–21.8] and 8 months (95% CI 6.1–9.9). The median OS for the patients with hepato-biliary involvement (RT = 0 vs. RT > 0) 45 months (95% CI 21.2–68.8 months) and 23 months (95% CI 13.9–32.03). Conclusions Hepatobiliary involvement is often associated with high tumor load and could require high complex multivisceral surgery. In selected patients complete cytoreduction could offer survival benefits. Morbidity related to hepatobiliary procedures is acceptable. Careful evaluation of patients and multidisciplinary approach in referral centers is mandatory. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08989-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ottavia D'Oria
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Carlo Schiavi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Pinto
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Fischetti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Lecce
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Battaglia
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecological Hospital Santa Maria Goretti of Latina, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Berloco
- Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3547-3553. [PMID: 32710215 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07817-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative liver ultrasound appears superior to liver-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to stage colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Most of the data come from studies on open surgery. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is technically demanding and its reliability is poor investigated. Aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of LUS staging for CRLMs compared to MRI. METHODS All patients with CRLMs scheduled for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) between 01/2010 and 06/2019 who underwent preoperative MRI were considered for the study. LUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient by patient basis. Reference standards were final pathology and 6 months follow-up results. RESULTS Amongst 189 LLR for CRLMs, 146 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 391 CRLMs were preoperatively detected by MRI. 24 new nodules in 16 (10.9%) patients were found by LUS and resected. Median diameter of new nodules was 5.5 mm (2-10 mm) and 10 (41.6%) were located in the hepatic dome. Pathology confirmed 17 newly detected malignant nodules (median size 4 mm) in 11 (7.5%) patients. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumours differed between LUS and MRI in 9 patients (6.1%). Intraoperative surgical strategy changed according LUS findings in 19 (13%) patients, requiring conversion to open approach in 3 (15.8%) of them. The sensitivity of LUS was superior to MRI (93.1% vs 85.6% whilst specificity was similar (98.6% MRI vs 96.5% LUS). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic liver ultrasound improves liver staging for CRLMs compared to liver-specific MRI.
Collapse
|
20
|
Giglio MC, Logghe B, Garofalo E, Tomassini F, Vanlander A, Berardi G, Montalti R, Troisi RI. Laparoscopic Versus Open Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score-Based Analysis of Local Control of the Ablated Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2370-2380. [PMID: 32060758 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08243-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic ablation (LA) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is frequently performed in combination with laparoscopic liver resection or as a stand-alone procedure. However, LA is technically demanding and whether the results are comparable with those of open ablation (OA) has not been determined to date. This study compared the effectiveness of LA and OA in achieving local tumor control of CRLMs. METHODS Patients undergoing LA or OA of CRLMs at Ghent University Hospital between June 2007 and February 2018 were identified from a prospective database. Lesions treated by LA and OA were matched 1:1 using a propensity score based on lesions (liver segment, size, deepness, proximity to a vessel), patients, and procedural characteristics. Ablation sites were followed up with computed-tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess the completeness of the ablation and ablation-site recurrence (ASR). Analysis of ASR was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS In this study, 163 patients underwent the surgical ablation (78 LA, 85 OA) of 333 CRLMs (143 LA, 190 OA). After matching, 220 lesions (110 LA, 110 OA) were analyzed. Ablation was complete in 93.7% (LA) and 97.3% (OA) of the sites (p = 0.195). No difference in ASR was observed (p = 0.351), with a cumulative risk of ASR at 12 months of 9.1% (LA) and 8.2% (OA). After multivariable analysis, ASR was confirmed to be independent of the surgical approach. CONCLUSION The findings showed that LA and OA achieve a comparable local control of CRLMs. This result further supports the adoption of a laparoscopic approach for the treatment of CRLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Bram Logghe
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eleonora Garofalo
- Student in Erasmus Exchange Programme, Faculty of Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Tomassini
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Aude Vanlander
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
First application of intraoperative MRI of the liver during ALPPS procedure for colorectal liver metastases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:373-379. [PMID: 32458140 PMCID: PMC7272488 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01890-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Intraoperative detection of intrahepatic lesions can be demanding. The use of preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computer tomography (CT) combined with intraoperative ultrasound of the liver is state of the art. Near totally regressed colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or nodules in severely altered liver tissue as steatosis or cirrhosis are often hard to detect during the operative procedure. Especially differentiation between benign atypical nodules and malignant tumors can be very difficult. The intraoperative use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound or intraoperative navigation are helpful tools. However, both methods show relevant limitations. The use of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) can overcome this problem. Relevant structures can be marked within the operative site or immediate control of complete tumor resection can be achieved. This might allow immediate surgical optimization in case of failure. Methods We report the intraoperative application of ioMRI in a case of a 61-year-old male patient suffering from rectal cancer with 10 synchronous bilobar CRLM who was treated stepwise by multimodal treatment and staged hepatectomy. Intraoperative contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver was used during completion procedure of an extended right hemihepatectomy performed as “Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)”. Results ioMRI provided excellent images and showed absence of liver metastases in the liver remnant. Procedure of ioMRI was safe, fast and feasible. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, we describe the first case of intraoperative application of a contrast-enhanced MRI during open liver surgery at the University Hospital of Dresden.
Collapse
|