Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critical Care Setting. Crit Care Res Pract. 2019;2019:6948710. [PMID: 31396416 PMCID: PMC6664494 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6948710]

A Retrospective Study on the Start and End of Continuous Hemodialysis using a Polymethylmethacrylate Hemofilter for Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Objective We previously reported the successful outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) after continuous hemodialysis using a polymethylmethacrylate hemofilter (PMMA-CHD). The present study makes informative suggestions regarding the initiation and termination of PMMA-CHD. Methods We retrospectively studied 63 patients with SAP admitted to the intensive-care unit between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, including 30 who received PMMA-CHD therapy for renal dysfunction. Statistical significance was evaluated using a multiple logistic regression analysis for severity scores, prognostic factor scores in the Japanese severity criteria, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage, and the lung injury score (LIS). Results At the onset of blood purification therapy using PMMA-CHD, a significant increase in the KDIGO stage was shown, with a cutoff value of 2.0. The prognostic factor score and LIS at the start of blood purification therapy were significantly high, with a cutoff value of 3.0. Analyses of severity scores, the KDIGO stage, and the LIS before the start of PMMA-CHD were also increased significantly, with cutoff values of +2.0, +1.0, and +3.0, respectively. Furthermore, on analyses of improvements in values after starting PMMA-CHD, the value of KDIGO staging significantly decreased, and the cutoff value was -2.0. The prognostic factor score was also significantly decreased, with a cutoff value of -2.0. Conclusion Prognostic factor scores of the Japanese severity criteria and LIS, as well as the KDIGO stage, are valuable indicators for determining the start and end of PMMA-CHD therapy.

Anticoagulation practices for continuous renal replacement therapy: a survey of physicians from the United States

BACKGROUND

During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), anticoagulants are recommended for patients at low risk of bleeding and not already receiving systemic anticoagulants. Current anticoagulants used in CRRT in the US are systemic heparins or regional citrate. To better understand use of anticoagulants for CRRT in the US, we surveyed nephrologists and critical care medicine (CCM) specialists.

METHODS

The survey contained 30 questions. Respondents were board certified and worked in intensive care units of academic medical centers or community hospitals.

RESULTS

150 physicians (70 nephrologists and 80 CCM) completed the survey. Mean number of CRRT machines in use increased ∼30% from the pre-pandemic era to 2022. Unfractionated heparin was the most used anticoagulant (43% of estimated patients) followed by citrate (28%). Respondents reported 29% of patients received no anticoagulant. Risk of hypocalcemia (52%) and citrate safety (42%) were the predominant reasons given for using no anticoagulant instead of citrate in heparin-intolerant patients. 84% said filter clogging was a problem when no anticoagulant was used, and almost 25% said increased transfusions were necessary. Respondents using heparin (n = 131) considered it inexpensive and easily obtainable, although of moderate safety, citing concerns of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bleeding. Anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution was the most used citrate. Respondents estimated that 37% of patients receiving citrate develop hypocalcemia and 17% citrate lock.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the increased use of CRRT and the lack of approved, safe, and effective anticoagulant choices for CRRT in the US, effective use of current and other anticoagulant options needs to be evaluated.

Acute Kidney Injury among Hospital-Admitted COVID-19 Patients: A Study from Jordan

Objective

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients have been admitted to hospitals with severe respiratory disease and suffered complications. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is among the more dangerous complications contributing to morbidity and mortality among patients.

Methods

This retrospective study focused on all hospital-admitted COVID-19 patients between September and December 2020. A total of 1,044 patients were enrolled. Patient demographics, medical records, and laboratory data were gathered. Patients were split into two groups: AKI and non-AKI. Comparisons comprised demographics, labs, ICU transfer, need for ventilation and oxygen therapy, medications, hospital stay, and deaths.

Results

AKI incidence in the cohort was 25.3%, and a majority were stage 1 (53.3%). Among these, hemodialysis was started in 1.8%. Higher age (P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (P=0.001), hypertension (P=0.001), ACEI/ARB use (P=0.008), erythrocyte-sedimentation rate (P=0.002), CRP (P<0.0001), and ferritin (P=0.01) were predictors of AKI. Among all admitted COVID-19 patients, 30.2% died in hospital. Among those with AKI, 75.9% died in comparison to 24.1% of non-AKI patients (P<0.001). Among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, 80.5% died: 70.5% were from the AKI group and 29.5% from the non-AKI group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

High mortality and morbidity is associated with COVID-19 infection, and AKI is contributing significantly to the outcomes of hospitalized patients with the infection. Early recognition of and treatment for AKI will decrease mortality and hospitalization in patients with COVID-19.

Overview of Renal Replacement Therapy Use in a General Intensive Care Unit

Objectives. Population-based studies regarding renal replacement therapy (RRT) used in critical care populations are useful to understand the trend and impact of medical care interventions. We describe the use of RRT and associated outcomes (mortality and length of intensive care stay) in a level 1 hospital. Design. A retrospective descriptive observational study. Patients. Critically ill patients admitted to the ICU from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Interventions. Age, gender, ward of admission, primary organ dysfunction at admission, length of hospital stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation, APACHE, SOFA and ISS scores, the use of vasopressors, transfusion, RRT and the number of RRT sessions were extracted. Results. 1703 critically ill patients were divided into two groups: the RRT-group (238 patients) and the non-RRT group (1465 patients). The mean age was 63.58 ± 17.52 (SD) in the final ICU studied patients (64.72 ± 16.64 SD in the RRT-group), 60.5% being male. Patients admitted from general surgery ward needing RRT were 41.4%. The specific scores, the use of vasopressors, transfusions and mortality were higher in the RRT-group. The ICU LOS was superior in the RRT-group, regardless of the primary organ dysfunction. Conclusions. RRT was practiced in 13.9% of patients (especially after age of 61), with mortality being the outcome for 66.8% of the RRT-group patients. All analyzed data were higher in the RRT group, especially for multiple trauma and surgical patients, or patients presenting cardiac or renal dysfunctions at admission. We found significant increased ISS scores in the RRT-group, a significant association between the need of vasopressors or transfusion requirement and RRT use, and an association in the number of RRT sessions and LOS (p < 0.001).

Outcomes of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in a Community Health System

OBJECTIVE

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly used in critically ill, hemodynamically unstable patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). This procedure is resource intensive with reported high in-hospital mortality. We evaluated mortality with CRRT in our healthcare system and markers associated with decreased survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study collected data on patients 18 years or older, without prior history of end stage kidney disease (ESKD), who received CRRT in the intensive care units at one of three hospitals in our health system in Columbus, OH from July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2019. Data included demographics, presenting diagnosis, comorbidities, laboratory markers, and patient disposition. In-hospital mortality rates and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated. We then compared information between two groups (patients who died during hospitalization and survivors) using univariate comparisons and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 56.8% (95%CI: 53.4-60.1) among patients who received CRRT. Mean SOFA scores did not differ between survival and mortality groups. The odds for in-patient mortality were increased for patients age ≥60 (OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.23-2.44), first bilirubin >2 mg/dL (OR = 1.73, 95%CI: 1.12-2.69), first creatinine < 2 mg/dL (OR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.04-2.37), first lactate > 2 mmol/L (OR = 2.08, 95%CI: 1.43-3.04). The odds for in-patient mortality were decreased for patients with cardiogenic shock (OR = .32, 95%CI: .17-.58) and hemorrhagic shock (OR = .29, 95%CI: .13-.63).

CONCLUSIONS

We report in-hospital mortality rates of 56.8% with CRRT. Unlike prior studies, higher mean SOFA scores were not predictive of higher in-hospital mortality in patients utilizing CRRT.

Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury in French Intensive Care Units: A Nationwide Survey of Practices

BACKGROUND

The frequency of acute kidney injury (AKI) can be as high as 50% in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the publication of national guidelines in France in 2015 for the use of RRT, there are no data describing the implementation of these recommendations in real-life.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide survey of practices from November 15, 2019, to January 24, 2020, in France. An electronic questionnaire based on the items recommended in the national guidelines was sent using an online survey platform, to the chiefs of all ICUs in France. The questionnaire comprised a section for the Department Chief about local organization and facilities, and a second section destined for individual physicians about their personal practices.

RESULTS

We contacted the Department Chief in 356 eligible ICUs, of whom 88 (24.7%) responded regarding their ICU organization. From these 88 ICUs, 232/285 physicians (82%) completed the questionnaire regarding individual practices. The practices reported by respondent physicians were as follows: intermittent RRT was first-line choice in >75% in a patient with single organ (kidney) failure at the acute phase, whereas continuous RRT was predominant (>75%) in patients with septic shock or multi-organ failure. Blood and dialysate flow for intermittent RRT were 200-300 mL/min and 400-600 mL/min, respectively. The dose of dialysis for continuous RRT was 25-35 mL/kg/h (65%). Insertion of the dialysis catheter was mainly performed by the resident under echographic guidance, in the right internal jugular vein. The most commonly used catheter lock was citrate (53%). The most frequently cited criterion for weaning from RRT was diuresis, followed by a drop in urinary markers (urea and creatinine).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a satisfactory level of reported compliance with French guidelines and recent scientific evidence among ICU physicians regarding initiation of RRT for AKI in the ICU.

A Review for the Practicing Clinician: Hepatorenal Syndrome, a Form of Acute Kidney Injury, in Patients with Cirrhosis

The hepatorenal syndrome type of acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), formerly known as type 1 hepatorenal syndrome, is a rapidly progressing renal failure that occurs in many patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites. Accumulating evidence has led to a recent evolution of diagnostic criteria for this serious complication of end-stage liver disease. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of disease-related characteristics and therapeutic management of patients with HRS-AKI. Relevant literature was compiled to support discussion of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis, associated conditions, prevention, treatment, and management of HRS-AKI. Onset of HRS-AKI is characterized by sudden severe renal vasoconstriction, leading to an acute reduction in glomerular filtration rate and rapid, potentially life-threatening, renal deterioration. Although our understanding of disease pathophysiology continues to evolve, etiology of HRS-AKI likely involves systemic hemodynamic changes caused by liver disease, inflammation, and damage to renal parenchyma. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis, which typically involves a clinical workup, abdominal imaging, and laboratory assessments. The current consensus definition of HRS-AKI includes proposed diagnostic criteria based on changes in serum creatinine levels tailored for high sensitivity, and rapid detection to accelerate diagnosis and treatment initiation. The only potential cure for HRS-AKI is liver transplantation; however, vasoconstrictive agents and other supportive measures are used as needed to help maintain survival for patients who are awaiting or are ineligible for transplantation. The severity of HRS-AKI, complex pathology, limited treatment options, and range of associated conditions pose significant challenges for both patients and care providers.

Patients with Severe Lactic Acidosis in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study of Contributing Factors and Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hyperlactatemia is a regular condition in the intensive care unit, which is often associated with adverse outcomes. Control of the triggering condition is the most effective treatment of hyperlactatemia, but since this is mostly not readily possible, extracorporeal renal replacement therapy (RRT) is often tried as a last resort. The present study aims to evaluate the factors that may contribute to the decision whether to start RRT or not and the potential impact of the start of RRT on the outcome in patients with severe lactic acidosis (SLA) (lactate ≥5 mmol/L).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort analysis over a 3-year period including all patients with a lactate level ≥5 mmol/L. Patients were considered as treated with RRT because of SLA if RRT was started within 24 h after reaching a lactate level ≥5 mmol/L.

RESULTS

Overall, 90-day mortality in patients with SLA was 34.5%. Of the 1,203 patients who matched inclusion/exclusion criteria, 11% (n = 133) were dialyzed within 24 h. The propensity to receive RRT was related to the lactate level and to the SOFA renal and cardio score. The most frequently used modality was continuous RRT. Patients who were started on RRT versus those who did not have 2.3 higher odds of mortality, even after adjustment for the propensity to start RRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis confirms the high mortality rate of patients with SLA. It adds that odds for mortality is even higher in patients who were started on RRT versus not. We suggest keeping an open mind to the factors that may influence the decision to start dialysis and bear in mind that without being a bridge to correction of the underlying condition, dialysis is unlikely to affect the outcome.

Kidney injury in COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to affect millions of people around the globe. As data emerge, it is becoming more evident that extrapulmonary organ involvement, particularly the kidneys, highly influence mortality. The incidence of acute kidney injury has been estimated to be 30% in COVID-19 non-survivors. Current evidence suggests four broad mechanisms of renal injury: Hypovolaemia, acute respiratory distress syndrome related, cytokine storm and direct viral invasion as seen on renal autopsy findings. We look to critically assess the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of kidney injury in COVID-19.

Factors Associated with In-Hospital Mortality after Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a broadly-accepted treatment for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury to optimize fluid and electrolyte management. Despite intensive dialysis care, there is a high mortality rate among these patients. There is uncertainty regarding the factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients requiring CRRT. This review evaluates how various risk factors influence the in-hospital mortality of critically ill patients who require CRRT. Five databases were surveyed to gather relevant publications up to 30 June 2020. We identified 752 works, of which we retrieved 38 in full text. Finally, six cohort studies that evaluated 1190 patients were eligible. The in-hospital mortality rate in these studies ranged from 38.6 to 62.4%. Our meta-analysis results showed that older age, lower body mass index, higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, decreased serum creatinine level, and increased serum sodium level were significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients who received CRRT. These results suggest that there are multiple modifiable factors that influence the risk of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT. Further, healthcare professionals should take more care when CRRT is performed on older adults.