The Effects of Immunosuppressive Factors on Primary Dendritic Cells from C57BL/6 and CBA Mice

Intraperitoneal injection of mesenchymal stem cells-conditioned media (MSCS-CM) treated monocyte can potentially alleviate motor defects in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis female mice; An original experimental study

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS), as a destructive pathology of myelin in central nervous system (CNS), causes physical and mental complications. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is laboratory model of MS widely used for CNS-associated inflammatory researches. Cell therapy using macrophage M2 (MPM2) is a cell type with anti-inflammatory characteristics for all inflammatory-based neuropathies. This experimental study investigated the probable therapeutic anti-inflammatory effects of intraperitoneal (IP) injection of MPM2 on alleviation of motor defect in EAE-affected animals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

24 C57/BL6 female mice were divided into four groups of EAE, EAE + Dexa, EAE + PBS, and EAE + MP2. EAE was induced through deep cervical injection of spinal homogenate of guinea pigs. MPM2 cells were harvested from bone marrow and injected (106cells/ml) in three days of 10, 13 and 16 post-immunizations (p.i). Clinical score (CS), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10), pro-inflammatory gene expression (TNF-α, IL-1β) and histopathological investigations (HE, Nissl and Luxol Fast Blue) were considered. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (v.19) and p < 0.05 was considered significant level.

RESULTS

During EAE induction, the mean animal weight was decreased (p < 0.05); besides, following MPM2 injection, the weight gain was applied (p < 0.05) in EAE + MPM2 groups than control. Increased (p < 0.05) levels of CS was found during EAE induction in days 17-28 in EAE animals; besides, CS was decreased (p < 0.05) in EAE + MPM2 group than EAE animals. Also, in days 25-28 of experiment, the CS was decreased (p < 0.05) in EAE + MPM2 than EAE + Dexa. Histopathological assessments revealed low density of cell nuclei in corpus callosum, microscopically. LFB staining also showed considerable decrease in white matter density of corpus callosum in EAE group. Acceleration of white matter density was found in EAE + MPM2 group following cell therapy procedure. Genes expression of TNF-α, IL-1β along with IL-4 and IL-10 were decreased (p < 0.05) in EAE + MPM2 group.

CONCLUSION

IP injection of MPM2 to EAE-affected female mice can potentially reduce the CNS inflammation, neuronal death and myelin destruction. MPM2 cell therapy can improve animal motor defects.

Unique Features of the Immune Response in BTBR Mice

Inflammation plays a considerable role in the pathogenesis of many diseases, including neurodegenerative and psychiatric ones. Elucidation of the specific features of an immune response in various model organisms, and studying the relation of these features with the behavioral phenotype, can improve the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of many psychopathologies. In this work, we focused on BTBR mice, which have a pronounced autism-like behavioral phenotype, elevated levels of oxidative-stress markers, an abnormal immune response, several structural aberrations in the brain, and other unique traits. Although some studies have already shown an abnormal immune response in BTBR mice, the existing literature data are still fragmentary. Here, we used inflammation induced by low-dose lipopolysaccharide, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid, or their combinations, in mice of strains BTBR T+Itpr3tf/J (BTBR) and C57BL6/J. Peripheral inflammation was assessed by means of a complete blood count, lymphocyte immunophenotyping, and expression levels of cytokines in the spleen. Neuroinflammation was evaluated in the hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex by analysis of mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor, Tnf), (interleukin-1 beta, Il-1β), and (interleukin-6, Il-6) and of markers of microglia activation (allograft inflammatory factor 1, Aif1) and astroglia activation (glial fibrillary acidic protein, Gfap). We found that in both strains of mice, the most severe inflammatory response was caused by the administration of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid, whereas the combined administration of the two toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists did not enhance this response. Nonetheless, BTBR mice showed a more pronounced response to low-dose lipopolysaccharide, an altered lymphocytosis ratio due to an increase in the number of CD4+ lymphocytes, and high expression of markers of activated microglia (Aif1) and astroglia (Gfap) in various brain regions as compared to C57BL6/J mice. Thus, in addition to research into mechanisms of autism-like behavior, BTBR mice can be used as a model of TLR3/TLR4-induced neuroinflammation and a unique model for finding and evaluating the effectiveness of various TLR antagonists aimed at reducing neuroinflammation.

Roles of type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells in allergen-specific immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment for allergic diseases by modification of the immune response to allergens. A key feature of AIT is to induce immunotolerance to allergens by generating antigen-specific regulatory T (Treg) cells in allergic patients. Type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells and forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3)-expressing Treg cells are well known among Treg cell subsets. Foxp3 was identified as a master transcription factor of Treg cells, and its expression is necessary for their suppressive activity. In contrast to Foxp3⁺ Treg cells, the master transcription factor of Tr1 cells has not been elucidated. Nevertheless, Tr1 cells are generally considered as a distinct subset of Treg cells induced in the periphery during antigen exposure in tolerogenic conditions and can produce large amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-β, followed by down-regulation of the function of effector immune cells independently of Foxp3 expression. Since the discovery of Tr1 cells more than 20 years ago, research on Tr1 cells has expanded our understanding of the mechanism of AIT. Although the direct precursors and true identity of these cells continues to be disputed, we and others have demonstrated that Tr1 cells are induced in the periphery by AIT, and the induced cells are re-activated by antigens, followed by suppression of allergic symptoms. In this review, we discuss the immune mechanisms for the induction of Tr1 cells by AIT and the immune-suppressive roles of Tr1 cells in AIT.