Comparison of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization-Radiofrequency Ablation and Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Alone for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macrovascular Invasion Using Propensity Score Analysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Chinese expert consensus on sequential surgery following conversion therapy based on combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic targeted drugs for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (2024 edition)

Up to half of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, for which effective treatment options are lacking, resulting in a poor prognosis. Over the past few years, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic targeted therapy has proven highly efficacious in treating advanced HCC, significantly extending patients' survival and providing a potential for sequential curative surgery. After sequential curative hepatectomy or liver transplantation following conversion therapy, patients can receive long-term survival benefits. In order to improve the long-term survival rate of the overall population with liver cancer and achieve the goal of a 15% increase in the overall 5-year survival rate outlined in the Healthy China 2030 blueprint, the Professional Committee for Prevention and Control of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Chinese Society of Liver Cancer, and the Liver Study Group of Surgery Committee of Beijing Medical Association organized in-depth discussions among relevant domestic experts in the field. These discussions focused on the latest progress since the release of the Chinese expert consensus on conversion therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined antiangiogenic targeted drugs for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 Edition) and resulted in a new consensus on the modifications and supplements to related key points. This consensus aims to further guide clinical practice, standardize medical care, and promote the development of the discipline.

Identification of prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion

OBJECTIVE

Vascular invasion (VI) profoundly impacts the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet the underlying biomarkers and mechanisms remain elusive. This study aimed to identify prognostic biomarkers for HCC patients with VI.

METHODS

Transcriptome data from primary HCC tissues and HCC tissues with VI were obtained through the Genome Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the two types of tissues were analyzed using functional enrichment analysis to evaluate their biological functions. We examined the correlation between DEGs and prognosis by combining HCC transcriptome data and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, along with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method were utilized to develop a prognostic model. The effectiveness of the model was assessed through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration diagram, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

In the GSE20017 and GSE5093 datasets, a total of 83 DEGs were identified. Gene Ontology analysis indicated that these DEGs were predominantly associated with xenobiotic stimulus, collagen-containing extracellular matrix, and oxygen binding. Additionally, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis revealed that the DEGs were primarily involved in immune defense and cellular signal transduction. Cox and LASSO regression further identified 7 genes (HSPA8, ABCF2, EAF1, MARCO, EPS8L3, PLA3G1B, C6), which were used to construct a predictive model in the training cohort. We used X-tile software to calculate the optimal cut-off value to stratify HCC patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. Notably, the high-risk group exhibited poorer prognosis than the low-risk group (P < 0.001). The model demonstrated area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.815, 0.730, and 0.710 at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year intervals in the training cohort, respectively. In the validation cohort, the corresponding AUC values were 0.701, 0.571, and 0.575, respectively. The C-index of the calibration curve for the training and validation cohorts were 0.716 and 0.665. Decision curve analysis revealed the model's efficacy in guiding clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicates that 7 genes may be potential prognostic biomarkers and treatment targets for HCC patients with VI.

Comparison of the Efficacy Among Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)-Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Apatinib, TACE Plus Apatinib, and TACE Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

From December 2015 to June 2018, 175 eligible participants were included in our research. Twenty-four patients who received apatinib plus TACE and RFA were categorized as the TACE + RFA-A group, 82 patients who received apatinib plus TACE were categorized as the TACE-A group, and 69 patients who received TACE alone were categorized as the TACE group. Treatment complications, treatment response, overall survival (OS), and time to progression (TTP) were recorded. Survival analyses were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted to investigate the predictive factors for OS and TTP. A subgroup analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

The median TTP was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.7-9.3) in the TACE + RFA-A, which was longer than the TACE-A group (6.0 months, 95% CI 4.8-7.2) and TACE group (3.0 months, 95% CI 2.3-3.7); the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The median OS was 23.0 months (95% CI 12.6-33.4) in the TACE + RFA-A group, 18.0 months (95% CI 16.2-19.8) in the TACE-A group, and 8.0 months (95% CI 5.3-10.7) in the TACE group; the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was higher in TACE + RFA-A t group (M1, 70.8% vs 65.9% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.023; M3, 58.3% vs. 53.7% vs. 26.1%, P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that treatment strategy and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for the OS and TTP, whereas the Child-Pugh stage was predictive factor of OS. No treatment-related death was observed. The toxicity was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with RFA plus apatinib is a safe three-modality treatment for the intermediate or advanced HCC, and it demonstrated better efficacy than TACE plus apatinib or TACE alone.

Hyperthermia ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus monotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The existing evidence has indicated that hyperthermia ablation (HA) and HA combined with transarterial chemoembolization (HATACE) are the optimal alternative to surgical resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the COVID-19 crisis. However, the evidence for decision-making is lacking in terms of comparison between HA and HATACE. Herein, a comprehensive evaluation was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of HATACE with monotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Worldwide studies were collected to evaluate the HATACE regimen for HCC due to the practical need for global extrapolation of applicative population. Meta-analyses were performed using the RevMan 5.3 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies involving a large sample of 5036 patients were included finally. Compared with HA alone, HATACE produced the advantage of 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (OR:1.90; 95%CI:1.46,2.46; p < 0.05) without increasing toxicity (p ≥ 0.05). Compared with TACE alone, HATACE was associated with superior 5-year OS rate (OR:3.54; 95%CI:1.96,6.37; p < 0.05) and significantly reduced the incidences of severe liver damage (OR:0.32; 95%CI:0.11,0.96; p < 0.05) and ascites (OR:0.42; 95%CI:0.20,0.88; p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis results of small (≤3 cm) HCC revealed that there were no significant differences between the HATACE group and HA monotherapy group in regard to the OS rates (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TACE alone, HATACE was more effective and safe for HCC. Compared with HA alone, HATACE was more effective for non-small-sized (>3 cm) HCC with comparable safety. However, the survival benefit of adjuvant TACE in HATACE regimen was not found for the patients with small (≤3 cm) HCC.