Pretreatment with Low-Dose Esketamine for Reduction of Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of etomidate added to propofol target-controlled infusion in bidirectional endoscopy: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Propofol has been widely used in bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation; however, it frequently leads to cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression. Propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) can provide safe sedation but may require higher dosages of propofol. On the contrary, etomidate offers hemodynamic stability.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of different dose etomidate added to propofol TCI sedation during same-visit bidirectional endoscopy.

METHODS

A total of 330 patients from Fujian Provincial Hospital were randomly divided into three groups: P, 0.1EP, and 0.15EP. Patients in the P group received propofol TCI only, with an initial effect-site concentration of the propofol TCI system of 3.0 mg/mL. Patients in the 0.1EP and 0.15EP groups received 0.1 and 0.15 mg/kg etomidate intravenous injection, respectively, followed by propofol TCI.

RESULTS

Patients in the 0.15EP group had higher mean blood pressure after induction than the other groups (P group: 78 mmHg, 0.1EP group: 82 mmHg, 0.15EP group: 88 mmHg; P < 0.05). Total doses of propofol consumption significantly decreased in the 0.15EP group compared with that in the other groups (P group: 260.6 mg, 0.1EP group: 228.1 mg, 0.15EP group: 201.2 mg; P < 0.05). The induction time was longer in the P group than in the other groups (P group: 1.9 ± 0.7 minutes, 0.1EP group: 1.2 ± 0.4 minutes, 0.15EP group: 1.1 ± 0.3 minutes; P < 0.01). The recovery time was shorter in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups (P group: 4.8 ± 2.1 minutes, 0.1EP group: 4.5 ± 1.6 minutes, 0.15EP group: 3.9 ± 1.4 minutes; P < 0.01). The incidence of hypotension (P group: 36.4%, 0.1EP group: 29.1%, 0.15EP group: 11.8%; P < 0.01) and injection pain was lower in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of respiratory depression was lower in the 0.15EP group than in the P group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the satisfaction of the patient, endoscopist, and anesthesiologist was higher in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that 0.15 mg/kg etomidate plus propofol TCI can significantly reduce propofol consumption, which is followed by fewer cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression, along with higher patient, endoscopist, and anesthesiologist satisfaction.

Preoperative Anxiety's Impact on the Median Effective Dose of Esketamine for Alleviating Propofol Injection Pain in Patients Undergoing Painless abortion: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Background

Propofol injection pain (PIP) is a frequent adverse effect during anesthesia induction, impacting patient comfort and satisfaction. Esketamine has been shown to alleviate PIP, but the optimal dose, especially in relation to preoperative anxiety levels, remains unclear. Preoperative anxiety may heighten pain perception and influence analgesic requirements.

Methods

A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted at The Affiliated Women and Children's Hospital of Ningbo University. A total of 150 eligible patients scheduled for painless abortion were assessed using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory - State form (STAI-S) and categorized into non-anxious (STAI-S score <40) and anxious (STAI-S score ≥40) groups. Patients were randomized using a computer-generated random number table to receive one of five escalating doses of esketamine (0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.17, or 0.20 mg/kg) prior to propofol administration. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PIP, assessed using Ambesh's four-point pain scale. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters and adverse events such as hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxemia.

Results

A clear dose-response relationship was observed, with higher doses of esketamine significantly reducing the incidence of PIP in both groups. Anxious patients required higher doses of esketamine to achieve comparable pain relief to non-anxious patients. The effective dose for 50% of patients (ED50) in the non-anxious group was 0.114 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.096-0.129 mg/kg), whereas it was 0.133 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.117-0.146 mg/kg) in the anxious group, with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of adverse events or hemodynamic stability.

Conclusion

Preoperative anxiety significantly increases the ED50 of esketamine required to alleviate propofol injection pain in patients undergoing painless abortion. Anxious patients require higher doses of esketamine to achieve effective analgesia. Individualizing esketamine dosing based on preoperative anxiety levels may enhance patient comfort and optimize pain management during anesthesia.

Pretreatment with Esketamine Reduces Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus During the Induction of Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Myoclonus is a common problem during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. A variety of agents, including opioids and lidocaine, reduced the incidence of myoclonus. However, there is no reported literature evaluating the effect of esketamine pretreatment on etomidate-induced myoclonus. We investigated the influence of pretreatment with esketamine on the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus.

Methods

This is a prospective, double-blind, and randomized controlled trial. One hundred patients aged 18-65 scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia (including urology surgery, gynaecology surgery, general surgery, and thoracic surgery) were randomly allocated into two groups, each consisting of 50 patients. Esketamine was pretreated with 0.1 mg/kg 60 s before the initiation of etomidate in Group ESK, while normal saline was administered as the placebo (Group C). During the first 1 minute after etomidate administration, myoclonus incidence and severity were assessed. In addition, we measured the hemodynamic changes and side effects of esketamine before administering etomidate.

Results

In group ESK, 14 patients (28%) had myoclonus (degrees of myoclonus: mild 2, moderate 7, severe 5), and 32 patients (64%) in group C (mild 6, moderate 5, severe 21) (P< 0.001). In group ESK, myoclonus incidence and severity were significantly lower than in group C (P< 0.001).

Conclusion

Esketamine 0.1mg/kg IV pretreatment significantly reduce the incidence and the severity of severe myoclonus of etomidate-induced myoclonus without significant adverse effects.

Efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

We explored the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation in painless colonoscopy.

METHODS

A total of 195 patients who underwent painless colonoscopy surgery were randomly divided into three groups: the propofol deep sedation group (group DS), the sufentanil combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS1) and the esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation (group CS2). The primary outcomes of this study included the incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia and excellent and good rates of anaesthesia during colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes included perioperative changes in vital signs (MAP, HR, and SpO2), anaesthesia induction time, dischargeable time, patient and endoscopist satisfaction scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), drowsiness, dizziness, propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation and vasoactive medications.

RESULTS

The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 7.081, P = 0.029). The incidence of hypotension in the CS2 group was significantly lower than that in the DS and CS1 groups (χ2 = 16.278, P < 0.001). The risk of hypoxemia was 5.727 times higher in Group DS than in Group CS2 (OR 5.727; 95%CI 1.203-27.273), and the risk of hypotension was 9.864 times higher in Group DS than in Group CS2 (OR 9.864; 95%CI 2.770-35.120). The risk of hypotension in Group CS1 was 5.167 times that in Group CS2 (OR 5.167; 95%CI 1.396-19.117). The incidence of propofol injection pain, assisted ventilation, ephedrine usage and drowsiness in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (χ2 = 57.618, P < 0.001; χ2 = 9.544, P = 0.008; χ2 = 14.820, P = 0.001; χ2 = 37.257, P < 0.001). The incidence of dizziness during recovery in the CS1 group was significantly greater than that in the DS and CS2 groups (χ2 = 6.594, P = 0.037). The dischargeable time in the DS group was significantly greater than that in the CS1 and CS2 groups (F = 53.039, P < 0.001). The satisfaction scores of the endoscopist and patients in the DS group were significantly lower than those in the CS1 and CS2 groups (F = 17.390, P < 0.001; F = 19.282; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, esketamine combined with propofol for conscious sedation can be safely and effectively used for painless colonoscopy and has fewer complications.It is recommended for painless colonoscopy.

Effective dose of propofol combined with intravenous esketamine for smooth flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in two distinct age groups of preschool children

BACKGROUND

There is limited research on the combined use of propofol and esketamine for anesthesia induction during flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) in pediatric patients, and the effective dosage of propofol for FLMA smooth insertion remains unclear. We explored the effective dose of propofol combined with intravenous esketamine for the smooth insertion of FLMA in two distinct age groups of preschool children.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observer-blind, interventional clinical study. Based on age, preschool children scheduled for elective surgery were divided into group A (aged 1-3 years) and group B (aged 3-6 years). Anesthesia induction was started with intravenous administration of esketamine (1.0 mg.kg- 1) followed by propofol administration. The FLMA was inserted 2 min after propofol administration at the target dose. The initial dose of propofol in group A and group B was 3.0 mg.kg- 1 and 2.5 mg.kg- 1, respectively. The target dose of propofol was determined with Dixon's up-and-down method, and the dosing interval of propofol was 0.5 mg.kg- 1. If there was smooth insertion of FLMA in the previous patient, the target dose of propofol for the next patient was reduced by 0.5 mg.kg- 1; otherwise, it was increased by 0.5 mg.kg- 1. The median 50% effective dose (ED50) for propofol was estimated using Dixon's up-and-down method and Probit analysis, while the 95% effective dose (ED95) was estimated through Probit analysis. Vital signs and adverse events during induction were recorded.

RESULTS

Each group included 24 pediatric patients. Using Dixon's up-and-down method, the ED50 of propofol combined with esketamine for smooth insertion of FLMA in group A was 2.67 mg.kg- 1 (95%CI: 1.63-3.72), which was higher than that in group B (2.10 mg. kg- 1, 95%CI: 1.36-2.84) (p = 0.04). Using Probit analysis, the ED50 of propofol was calculated as 2.44 (95% CI: 1.02-3.15) mg.kg- 1 in group A and 1.93 (95% CI: 1.39-2.32) mg.kg- 1 in group B. The ED95 of propofol was 3.72 (95%CI: 3.07-15.18) mg.kg- 1 in group A and 2.74 (95%CI: 2.34-5.54) mg.kg- 1 in group B. In Group B, one pediatric patient experienced laryngospasm.

CONCLUSION

The effective dose of propofol when combined with intravenous esketamine for smooth insertion of FLMA in children aged 1-3 years is 2.67 mg.kg- 1, which is higher than that in children aged 3-6 years (2.10 mg. kg- 1).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100044317; Registration Date: 2021/03/16).

Esketamine use is associated with shortened postoperative hospital stay in patients after knee arthroscopic surgery: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have examined anesthetics to improve postoperative prognosis after knee arthroscopic surgery. However, it is currently unknown whether perioperative anesthetics can influence postoperative hospital stay. We investigated the impact of esketamine after knee arthroscopic surgery on post-operative length of stay, fever and surgical site infection.

METHODS

This study included 455 patients who underwent knee surgery between January2020 and August 2021at a tertiary hospital in China. Patient characteristics, preoperative laboratory values, intra-operative anesthetic data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with or without propensity score matching were performed to identify factors related to post-operative discharge within 3 days(PD3).

RESULTS

A total of 297 cases met our inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 42 ± 14 years, mean body mass index, 24.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2, 157(53%) patients were male. Meniscus-related procedures accounted for the most part of all the procedures with a percentage of 40.4%, followed by combined procedures of 35.4%. After we adjusted for demographic and intraoperative characteristics with propensity score matching, esketamine use was significantly associated with PD3 with the highest odds ratio of 2.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-4.41, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Esketamine use was associated with PD3 in patients underwent knee arthroscopic surgery. The findings of this study will be useful to anesthesiologists in making informed decisions regarding the choice of anesthetics for knee joint diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval No.:2023-041-01) of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University and retrospectively registered.

The effects of esketamine on blood pressure and hypotension incidence during induction of bariatric surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of obesity is high. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity; however, the induction phase of anesthesia in these patients poses a risk of hypotension. Esketamine, known for its sympathetic nervous system stimulation, may stabilize blood pressure during induction. This study aimed to investigate the effects of esketamine on blood pressure in bariatric surgery patients.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included 145 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive esketamine or a control intervention during induction. Blood pressure and other vital signs were measured and compared between the 2 groups using statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Administration of esketamine increased blood pressure before intubation (T2). The incidence of hypotension was lower in the esketamine group at multiple time points during induction. Postoperatively, the esketamine group exhibited lower pain scores at 24 hours and a reduced need for rescue analgesics.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of 0.2 mg/kg esketamine during the induction phase of bariatric surgery can improve blood pressure stability and decrease the incidence of hypotension. Furthermore, it is associated with reduced postoperative pain. Future studies could explore the effects of higher esketamine doses and validate these findings in a larger and more diverse patient population.

Effect of Esketamine Gargle on Postoperative Sore Throat in Patients Undergoing Double-Lumen Endobronchial Intubation: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Background

Postoperative sore throat is a frequent adverse event after double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) intubation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether esketamine gargle has a preventive effect on the incidence of postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing DLT intubation.

Methods

This trial included 140 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery at the third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Patients were randomly allocated into the following two groups of 70 patients each: the control group, gargling with saline of 30 mL, and the esketamine group, gargling with an esketamine solution of 30 mL (2 mL/50 mg esketamine in 28 mL saline), 5 min prior to anaesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of sore throat 24 h after surgery. The main secondary outcomes included the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness at 1 h and 48 h after surgery, as well as the intraoperative haemodynamic responses.

Results

The incidence of sore throat was significantly higher in the control group (47.1%, 33/70 patients) compared with the esketamine group (12.9%, 9/70 patients) at 24 h after surgery (RD, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.57; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of sore throat at 1 h (p = 0.027), 24 h (p = 0.019), and seventh day (p = 0.031) as well as hoarseness at 1 h (p = 0.027), 24 h (p = 0.019), and 48 h (p = 0.031) after surgery were reduced in the esketamine group. Significant differences were seen in the peak levels of systolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate between the groups during the intubation (p < 0.05). Besides, no patient developed an adverse reaction to esketamine.

Conclusion

Preoperative gargling of esketamine can provide an effect against sore throat after DLT intubation without adverse side effects and effectively inhibit sharp elevations in heart rate and blood pressure during double-lumen intubation procedures.

Remimazolam versus propofol in combination with esketamine for surgical abortion: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine with a short half-life, good efficacy, and safety profiles in general anesthesia. Combining esketamine with propofol (P + E) could reduce propofol consumption and injection pain. It is, however, unclear if a low dose of remimazolam co-administrated with esketamine (R + E) is comparable to the increasingly used P + E for surgical abortion with general anesthetic. We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of R + E and P + E. Two hundred patients scheduled for a surgical abortion were randomized to receive remimazolam 0.3 mg/kg plus esketamine 0.3 mg/kg (R + E), and propofol 2 mg/kg plus esketamine 0.3 mg/kg (P + E). Sedative effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the time to lose consciousness (LOC), recovery time, and successful sedation rate. Safety was assessed by hemodynamics and adverse events during and postoperation. The time to LOC and recovery time in R + E was 5 s shorter and 1 min longer than that in P + E, respectively (both p < 0.001). Success sedation rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.73). Bradycardia incidence and injection site pain were less frequent in the R + E group than that in the P + E group. More rash was observed in the R + E group compared with the P + E group (32% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), but all were mild (only chest rash) and resolved subsequently. Low dose of remimazolam when combined with esketamine has favorable profiles with rapid onset and recovery, but mild hemodynamic side effects and adverse events. It can be used as an alternative for surgical abortion with general anesthetic.

Esketamine prevents propofol-induced injection pain: Randomized controlled trial

Background: Propofol is widely used during anesthesia. However, propofol-induced injection pain (PIP) is considered an unpleasant perioperative outcome. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a mixture of esketamine and propofol in preventing propofol injection pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, and randomized controlled trial. We included 252 adult patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to II who underwent surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to four groups (n = 63 per group). Group NS received a mixture of 1% propofol (20 ml) and 0.9% normal saline (1 ml), group ESK-4 received a mixture of 1% propofol (20 ml) and esketamine 4 mg (diluted with 0.9% normal saline, 1 ml), group ESK-12 received a mixture of 1% propofol (20 ml) and esketamine 12 mg (diluted with 0.9% normal saline, 1 ml), and group ESK-20 received a mixture of 1% propofol (20 ml) and esketamine 20 mg (diluted with 0.9% normal saline, 1 ml) as sedative drugs during anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence and distribution of different degrees of PIP. The secondary outcomes were vital signs, characteristics of surgery and anesthesia, and adverse events.

Results: The incidence of PIP in group ESK-20 (33.3%) was significantly lower than that in groups NS, ESK-4, and ESK-12 (63.3%, 62.2%, and 49.1%, respectively; p &lt; 0.01). The incidence of moderate PIP in group NS (33.3%) and group ESK-4 (22.6%) was higher than that in groups ESK-12 (7.5%) and ESK-20 (6.7%). The incidence of severe PIP in group NS (6.7%) and group ESK-4 (9.4%) was higher than that in groups ESK-12 (1.9%) and ESK-20 (0%). There were no differences in the vital signs, characteristics of surgery and anesthesia, or adverse events between the groups.

Conclusion: Our results indicated that the esketamine–propofol admixture reduced the incidence of PIP in patients undergoing general anesthesia without severe side effects.