Recognise and Acknowledge Us: Views of Traditional Birth Attendants on Collaboration with Midwives for Maternal Health Care Services

Experiences of Birth Attendants on Upward Obstetric Emergency Referrals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Every day, approximately 800 women die from pregnancy-related causes, alongside 2.6 million stillbirths and 2.8 million neonatal deaths annually. Inadequate referral by skilled birth attendants hinders timely access to necessary emergency obstetric care, challenging progress toward the maternal health Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3. The COVID-19 pandemic further disrupted care in low- and middle-income countries, forcing women to rely on traditional birth attendants, thereby affecting the referral system. It is crucial to understand the experiences of both skilled and traditional birth attendants regarding upward referrals in emergency obstetric care to identify barriers and facilitators within these systems in low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to map existing evidence on the experiences of skilled and traditional birth attendants regarding upward referral systems in emergency obstetric care within low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

We will conduct a scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodological framework. Studies will be included if they report on experiences with upward referral in obstetrical emergencies. We will consider studies published in English and French from 2016 to July 2024. The literature search will be conducted in databases including PubMed, EBSCOhost (Academic Search Complete and CINAHL with full text), Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Identified citations will be managed using EndNote version 21 (Clarivate Analytics) and Rayyan. Two independent reviewers will screen eligible studies and resolve disagreements through discussion with a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a validated form and analyzed through content analysis, with findings presented narratively. This protocol aligns with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The review will offer a comprehensive narrative of upward referral systems in obstetrical emergencies, focusing on transitions from traditional birth attendants to health care facilities and from lower to higher levels of health care.

RESULTS

The preliminary search was completed in August 2024, and the database search will be conducted within the next 6 months. Findings will be disseminated through medical education conferences and publications.

CONCLUSIONS

This review contributes a comprehensive narrative of upward referral systems in obstetrical emergencies, aiming to enhance understanding and improve transitions from traditional birth attendants to health care facilities and between different health care levels. It could significantly impact maternal and neonatal care by identifying the referral experiences of both skilled and traditional birth attendants. The insights may inform interventions that integrate traditional birth attendants into health care systems, potentially reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. The results will guide future research aimed at developing a model to improve upward referrals for obstetric emergencies in sub-Saharan Africa.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework 4HAVZ; https://osf.io/4havz.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/64886.

Ninety-one years of midwifery continuity of care in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Midwifery continuity of care during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum is essential for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), however, challenges such as healthcare worker shortages, limited infrastructure, poor healthcare access, and cultural barriers often hinder the effective provision of midwifery services. These issues contribute to unsustainable and inadequate care, adversely affecting maternal and newborn health. This study examines the impact of these challenges on the midwifery continuity of care and its subsequent effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We analyzed 43 articles published between 1932 and 2023 across four databases. Included studies were conducted in LMICs, focused on continuous care models, and published in English. The review aimed to capture the varied impacts of midwifery care on health outcomes.

RESULTS

The review found that midwifery continuity of care in LMICs significantly improves maternal and newborn health by reducing medical interventions, increasing physiological births, and enhancing maternal satisfaction and breastfeeding rates. The approach also lowers newborn mortality and morbidity. Success factors include community acceptance, midwives' cultural competence, and collaboration with traditional birth attendants. Barriers such as insufficient funding and resistance to change persist. Midwife-led continuity of care (MLCC) was associated with a 16% reduction in neonatal loss and a 24% reduction in pre-term births. Also, MLCC decreases newborn mortality by 10-20% and increases breastfeeding rates by up to 30%. Effective implementation requires integrating midwifery services into existing health systems, securing funding, expanding training, and strengthening community partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

Midwifery continuity of care enhances maternal and neonatal health in LMICs by minimizing unnecessary medical interventions and improving maternal satisfaction and breastfeeding outcomes. However, cultural and socioeconomic factors influence its acceptance. Further research is needed to integrate traditional birth attendants into formal health systems, overcome resistance to change, and develop strategies for effective collaboration between traditional and professional care providers.

Maternal and Child Health Training of Traditional Birth Attendants and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In remote communities, maternal and child health is often compromised due to limited access to healthcare. Simultaneously, these communities historically rely greatly on traditional birth attendants (TBAs). However, optimal integration of these traditional methods with modern healthcare practices remains a topic of debate. We assessed the effect of maternal and child health training of traditional birth attendants on adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer the above research question. We independently screened studies using databases like PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. Due to fewer original studies in this field, we considered both pre-post and between-group differences to assess the effect of differences. These were synthesised separately, assessed against a p-value function, and subjected to sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

We included six interventional studies. Training TBAs reduced the risk of perinatal mortality [0.69, 0.61-0.78] and 7-day neonatal mortality [0.65, 0.53-0.80] but not stillbirth [0.70, 0.39-1.26]. In randomized controlled trials, there is a lower risk of perinatal mortality [0.73, 0.67-0.79] and neonatal mortality [0.70, 0.62-0.80] but not stillbirth [0.81, 0.56-1.18] with trained traditional birth attendants. There are methodological concerns with most existing studies, including domains like allocation concealment.

DISCUSSION

There is some evidence of the benefit of training TBAs, though of a low to very low certainty. Due to fewer studies, inconsistent estimates for different critical outcomes, and concerns with the existing studies, further well-designed studies can give more insights. They can also help optimize the contents of TBA training interventions.

PROTOCOL

CRD42023412935 (PROSPERO).

Knowledge and attitudes of midwives towards collaboration with traditional birth attendants for maternal and neonatal healthcare services in rural communities in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the knowledge and attitude of registered midwives towards collaborating with traditional birth attendants for maternal and neonatal healthcare services in rural communities.

DESIGN

A descriptive cross-sectional survey was followed in this study.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered midwives in selected clinics in the City of Tshwane Municipality. Participants were recruited by stratified random sampling. Data was collected at the Thirty-four primary healthcare facilities in Gauteng province, South Africa.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

A self-assessment questionnaire was administered to 304 registered midwives. Two-hundred and sixty respondents returned the questionnaire representing a response rate of 86.6 % which was statistically significant. The majority of Midwives in South Africa displayed a low level of knowledge (mean = 41.8, SD=1.7) on the role and practices of traditional birth attendants). Only 30.8 % (n = 80) of midwives knew of the roles of traditional birth attendants for maternal and neonatal healthcare (MNH) services. With respect to knowledge, there was significant associated with the Professional category (p < 0.015). In terms of attitude, registered midwives displayed negative attitudes towards collaborating with traditional birth attendants (mean = 46.8, SD=2.1). Approximately half (54.2 %, n = 140) of midwives were amenable towards collaborating in the provision of antenatal care, and 70.4 % (n = 183) of midwives agreed to collaborate with traditional birth attendants for extended roles such as accompanying women to health facilities. Association of demographic data and level of attitude showed there was significant relationship (p < 0.05) between registered midwives' level of education and their attitude towards collaboration.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Midwives demonstrated positive attitude towards collaborating with traditional birth attendants at the antenatal care level only. Midwives were not amenable to collaboration at the level of intrapartum and postpartum care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Based on our results, collaboration should be at antenatal care level to allow for early detection, treatment, and prevention of antenatal complications thus reducing maternal mortality and morbidity.

An Inclusive Framework for Collaboration between Midwives and Traditional Birth Attendants and Optimising Maternal and Child Healthcare in Restricted Rural Communities in South Africa: Policy Considerations

Collaboration between midwives and traditional birth attendants for maternal and child healthcare is a challenge in rural South African communities due to the absence of a guiding framework. To address this, this study sought to develop and validate an inclusive framework informed by the Donabedian structure-process-outcome (SPO) framework for collaboration between these healthcare professionals.

METHOD

Key stakeholders were invited to participate in a co-creation workshop to develop the framework. Twenty (20) participants were purposively sampled based on their maternal and child healthcare expertise. A consensus design using the nominal group technique was followed.

RESULTS

Participants identified the components needed in the framework, encompassing (i) objectives, (ii) structures, (iii) processes, and (iv) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This paper will contribute to the development of an inclusive healthcare framework, providing insights for stakeholders, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to improve maternal and child healthcare outcomes in resource-constrained, rural settings. Ultimately, the proposed framework will create a sustainable and culturally sensitive model that optimises the strengths of midwives and TBAs and fosters improved healthcare delivery to rural South African communities.

Reframing the Three Delays framework: factors influencing referrals to facilities by matrones in rural Haiti

In Haiti, there has been limited research on the experiences of traditional birth attendants/matrones when they decide to refer and accompany pregnant women to the facility for giving birth. Understanding this contextualised experience could help to strengthen programming aimed at improving maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) outcomes in rural Haiti. This paper describes the qualitative findings from seven focus group discussions (FGDs) with matrones regarding their experience of referring pregnant women to facilities in Haiti's Central Plateau. Each FGD was conducted in Haitian Kreyol and audio recorded. Recordings were transcribed, translated to English, and thematically analysed. A conceptual model visualising factors influencing matrone decision-making was then developed using an adapted version of the Three Delays framework. Findings from this study show that matrones face a complex, multilayered web of intertwining factors related to attitudes and beliefs around their role, resource availability, and perceptions around quality of care and treatment. Each factor corresponds to a delay in the Three Delays framework. The factors can occur at the same time or each can occur individually at different times, and influence the decision to refer. The complexity of factors identified reflects the need to reassess the Three Delays framework so that it accounts for the intertwining, cyclical complexities faced by those trying to access the facility amidst the backdrop of both time and the community/social contexts. Results further reflect the need for strengthened health systems that better facilitate matrone facility-based referrals, improving outcomes for all parties involved and bridging the gap between homes/ communities and facilities. This calls for better integration of the matrones into the formal health system to systematically strengthen the continuum of MNCH health services provided from home to facility.