Effect of referral systems on costs and outcomes after hip fracture surgery in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

To explore the economic burdens of hip fracture surgery in patients referred to lower-level medical institutions and to evaluate how referral systems affect costs and outcomes of hip fracture surgery.

DESIGN

A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

All hospitals in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 7500 patients who had received hip fracture surgery (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes 820.0 ∼ 820.9 and procedure codes 79.15, 79.35, 81.52, 81.53) performed in 1997 to 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total costs including outpatient costs, inpatient costs and total medical costs and medical outcomes including 30-day readmission, 90-day readmission, infection, dislocation, revision and mortality.

RESULTS

The patients were referred to a lower medical institution after hip fracture surgery (downward referral group) and 3034 patients continued treatment at the same medical institution (non-referral group). Demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics and institutional characteristics were significantly associated with postoperative costs and outcomes (P < 0.05). On average, the annual healthcare cost was New Taiwan Dollars (NT$)2262 per patient lower in the downward referral group compared with the non-referral group. The annual economic burdens of the downward referral group approximated NT$241 million (2019 exchange rate, NT$30.5 = US$1).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative costs and outcomes of hip fracture surgery are related not only to demographic and clinical characteristics, but also to institutional characteristics. The advantages of downward referral after hip fracture surgery can save huge medical costs and provide a useful reference for healthcare authorities when drafting policies for the referral system.

Acute Care Referral Systems in Liberia: Transfer and Referral Capabilities in a Low-Income Country

Introduction Following two decades of armed conflict in Liberia, over 95% of health care facilities were partially or completely destroyed. Although the Liberian health system has undergone significant rehabilitation, one particular weakness is the lack of organized systems for referral and prehospital care. Acute care referral systems are a critical component of effective health care delivery and have led to improved quality of care and patient outcomes. Problem This study aimed to characterize the referral and transfer systems in the largest county of Liberia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, health referral survey of a representative sample of health facilities in Montserrado County, Liberia was performed. A systematic random sample of all primary health care (PHC) clinics, fraction proportional to district population size, and all secondary and tertiary health facilities were included in the study sample. Collected data included baseline information about the health facility, patient flow, and qualitative and quantitative data regarding referral practices.

RESULTS

A total of 62 health facilities-41 PHC clinics, 11 health centers (HCs), and 10 referral hospitals (RHs)-were surveyed during the 6-week study period. In sum, three percent of patients were referred to a higher-level of care. Communication between health facilities was largely unsystematic, with lack of specific protocols (n=3; 5.0%) and standardized documentation (n=26; 44.0%) for referral. While most health facilities reported walking as the primary means by which patients presented to initial health facilities (n=50; 81.0%), private vehicles, including commercial taxis (n=37; 60.0%), were the primary transport mechanism for referral of patients between health facilities.

CONCLUSION

This study identified several weaknesses in acute care referral systems in Liberia, including lack of systematic care protocols for transfer, documentation, communication, and transport. However, several informal, well-functioning mechanisms for referral exist and could serve as the basis for a more robust system. Well-integrated acute care referral systems in low-income countries, like Liberia, may help to mitigate future public health crises by augmenting a country's capacity for emergency preparedness. Kim J , Barreix M , Babcock C , Bills CB . Acute care referral systems in Liberia: transfer and referral capabilities in a low-income country. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):642-650.

Initiating a Standardized Regional Referral and Counter-Referral System in Guatemala: A Mixed-Methods Study

Background:Few data exist for referral processes in resource-limited settings. We utilized mixed-methods to evaluate the impact of a standardized algorithm and training module developed for locally identified needs in referral/counter-referral procedures between primary health centers (PHCs) and a Guatemalan referral hospital. Methods: PHC personnel and hospital physicians participated in surveys and focus groups pre-implementation and 3, 6, and 12 months post-implementation to evaluate providers’ experience with the system. Referred patient records were reviewed to evaluate system effectiveness. Results: A total of 111 initial focus group participants included 96 (86.5%) from PHCs and 15 from the hospital. Of these participants, 53 PHC physicians and nurses and 15 hospital physicians initially completed written surveys. Convenience samples participated in follow-up. Eighteen focus groups achieved thematic saturation. Four themes emerged: effective communication; provision of timely, quality patient care with adequate resources; educational opportunities; and development of empowerment and relationships. Pre- and post-implementation surveys demonstrated significant improvement at the PHCs (P < .001) and the hospital (P = .02). Chart review included 435 referrals, 98 (22.5%) pre-implementation and 337 (77.5%) post-implementation. There was a trend toward an increased percentage of appropriately referred patients requiring medical intervention (30% vs 40%, P = .08) and of patients requiring intervention who received it prior to transport (55% vs 73%, P = .06). Conclusions: Standardizing a referral/counter-referral system improved communication, education, and trust across different levels of pediatric health care delivery. This model may be used for extension throughout Guatemala or be modified for use in other countries. Mixed-methods research design can evaluate complex systems in resource-limited settings.

Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: describing complex pathways in referral management interventions

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in innovative methods to carry out systematic reviews of complex interventions. Theory-based approaches, such as logic models, have been suggested as a means of providing additional insights beyond that obtained via conventional review methods.

METHODS

This paper reports the use of an innovative method which combines systematic review processes with logic model techniques to synthesise a broad range of literature. The potential value of the model produced was explored with stakeholders.

RESULTS

The review identified 295 papers that met the inclusion criteria. The papers consisted of 141 intervention studies and 154 non-intervention quantitative and qualitative articles. A logic model was systematically built from these studies. The model outlines interventions, short term outcomes, moderating and mediating factors and long term demand management outcomes and impacts. Interventions were grouped into typologies of practitioner education, process change, system change, and patient intervention. Short-term outcomes identified that may result from these interventions were changed physician or patient knowledge, beliefs or attitudes and also interventions related to changed doctor-patient interaction. A range of factors which may influence whether these outcomes lead to long term change were detailed. Demand management outcomes and intended impacts included content of referral, rate of referral, and doctor or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The logic model details evidence and assumptions underpinning the complex pathway from interventions to demand management impact. The method offers a useful addition to systematic review methodologies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42013004037.