Mao XY, Zhang YF, Mao GP, Ning SB. Diagnostic value of balloon-assisted endoscopy and capsule endoscopy in emergency obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2014;
22:5360-5364. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v22.i34.5360]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To compare the diagnostic value of balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) in emergency obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with emergency OGIB treated at our hospital from July 2011 to May 2014 were included in this study. Ten cases underwent CE examination before BAE examination, and 34 cases underwent BAE in 72 h after diagnosis.
RESULTS: The detection rate of emergency OGIB by CE was 30% (3/10), among which one case was diagnosed as small intestinal diverticulum, and two cases as stromal tumors. Of the other seven cases which were negative in CE examination, four were small intestinal diverticulum, two were vascular disease and one was small intestine anastomotic ulcer. The detection rate of emergency OGIB by BAE was 88.23% (30/34), among which the numbers of cases of small intestinal diverticulum, stromal tumor, vascular disease, small intestine anastomotic ulcer and intestine ulcer were 16, 4, 4, 4 and 2, respectively. The detection rate of emergency OGIB by BAE was significantly higher than that by CE (88.23% vs 30.00%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of BAE for emergency OGIB is higher than that of CE. BAE is safe and effective in the diagnosis of emergency OGIB.
Collapse