The efficacy of non-anesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation with a target-controlled infusion system during double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

BACKGROUND

The sedation method used during double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DB-ERCP) differs among countries and/or facilities, and there is no established method. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-anesthesiologist-administered propofol (NAAP) sedation using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system during DB-ERCP.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between May 2017 and December 2020 at an academic center. One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients who underwent DB-ERCP were sedated by gastroenterologists using diazepam (n = 77) or propofol with a TCI system (n = 79), depending on the period. The primary endpoint was a comparison of poor sedation rates between the two groups. Poor sedation was defined as a condition requiring the use of other sedative agents or discontinuation of the procedure. Secondary endpoints were sedation-related adverse events and risk factors for poor sedation.

RESULTS

Poor sedation occurred significantly more often in the diazepam sedation group (diazepam sedation, n = 12 [16%] vs. propofol sedation, n = 1 [1%]; P = 0.001). Vigorous body movements (3 or 4) (diazepam sedation, n = 40 [52%] vs. propofol sedation, n = 28 [35%]; P = 0.038) and hypoxemia (< 85%) (diazepam sedation, n = 7 [9%] vs. propofol sedation, n = 1 [1%]; P = 0.027) occurred significantly more often in the diazepam sedation group. In the multivariate analysis, age < 70 years old (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 1.57-66.98; P = 0.015), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR, 11.96; 95% CI, 1.67-85.69; P = 0.014), and propofol sedation (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.58; P = 0.015) were associated factors for poor sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

NAAP sedation with the TCI system during DB-ERCP was safer and more effective than diazepam sedation.

Clinical characteristics of Dieulafoy's lesion in the small bowel diagnosed and treated by double-balloon endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding refers to bleeding for which the source cannot be ascertained even through balloon-assisted endoscopy. In certain instances, Dieulafoy's lesion in the small bowel is presumed to be the underlying cause.

AIM

This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of Dieulafoy's lesion in the small bowel as diagnosed via double-balloon endoscopy while also exploring the feasibility of predicting bleeding from Dieulafoy's lesion prior to endoscopy in cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

A comprehensive analysis of our database was conducted, identifying 38 patients who received a diagnosis of Dieulafoy's lesion and subsequently underwent treatment via double-balloon endoscopy. The clinical background, diagnosis, and treatment details of patients with Dieulafoy's lesion were carefully examined.

RESULTS

The median age of the 38 patients was 72 years, and 50% of the patients were male. A total of 26 (68%) patients exhibited a high comorbidity index. The upper jejunum and lower ileum were the most frequently reported locations for the occurrence of Dieulafoy's lesion in the small bowel. The detected Dieulafoy's lesions exhibited active bleeding (n = 33) and an exposed vessel with plaque on the surface (n = 5). Rebleeding after endoscopic treatment occurred in 8 patients (21%, median period: 7 days, range: 1-366 days). We conducted an analysis to determine the definitive nature of the initial double-balloon endoscopy diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that hematochezia of ≥ 2 episodes constituted the independent factor associated with ≥ 2 double-balloon endoscopy diagnoses. Additionally, we explored factors associated with rebleeding following endoscopic treatment. Although the number of hemoclips utilized displayed a likely association, multivariate analysis did not identify any independent factor associated with rebleeding.

CONCLUSION

If a patient encounters multiple instances of hematochezia, promptly scheduling balloon-assisted endoscopy, equipped with optional instruments without delay is advised, after standard endoscopic evaluation with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy is unrevealing.

Balloon-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating small intestinal lipomas: Report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Most small intestinal lipomas are treated surgically, and some require repeated surgeries for multiple lipomas. However, application of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technology in the deep small intestine is rarely reported owing to the special anatomical structure of the small intestine, medical equipment limitations, and the lack of relevant experience among endoscopists.

CASE SUMMARY

Two patients with small intestinal lipomas treated at the Air Force Medical Center from November 2015 to September 2019 were selected to undergo balloon-assisted ESD to treat the lipomas and explore the technical feasibility and safety of ESD for treating small intestinal lipomas. The two patients successfully underwent balloon-assisted ESD to treat four small intestinal lipomas, with a complete resection rate of 100% (4/4), without intraoperative or postoperative bleeding, perforation, or other complications. After 3-6 mo of postoperative follow-up, the clinical symptoms caused by the lipomas were significantly relieved or disappeared after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Balloon-assisted ESD is a safe and reliable new method for treating deep intestinal lipomas and shows good clinical feasibility.

Management of difficult or failed biliary access in initial ERCP: A review of current literature

Selective bile duct cannulation is the prerequisite for all endoscopic biliary therapeutic interventions, but this cannot always be achieved easily. Despite advances and new developments in endoscopic accessories, selective biliary access fails in 5%-15% of cases, even in expert high volume centers. Various techniques - such as double-guidewire induced cannulation, pre-cut papillotomy or transpancreatic sphincterotomy with or without placement of a pancreatic stent - have been used to improve cannulation success rates. Repeated and prolonged attempts at cannulation increase the risk of pancreatitis. Repeating the ERCP within a few days after initial failed pre-cut is a successful strategy and should be tried before contemplating more invasive, alternative interventions such as percutaneous-endoscopic or endoscopic ultrasound guided rendezvous procedure, percutaneous transhepatic or surgical intervention. However, standard guidelines or sequential protocol has not been existed up to now. In certain circumstances, there are unique clinical indications for which invasive, alternative interventions should be preferred. We present and discuss the methods that can be used in difficult or failed initial ERCP, therefore to provide practical advice for endoscopists, especially those who are inexperienced.

Rectal biopsy, rather than ileal, is appropriate to confirm the diagnosis of early gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

OBJECTIVE

Once gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it may be life-threatening. Therefore, an earlier accurate diagnosis of macroscopic and microscopic features using an appropriate modality improves the prognosis of patients with suspected GI-GVHD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In patients experiencing watery diarrhea within 100 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, we evaluated the severity of mucosal injury at the proximal ileum, terminal ileum, and rectum according to previously reported criteria using transanal single balloon endoscopy. GI-GVHD was diagnosed by the presence of gland apoptosis without inflammatory or infectious factors in the biopsied specimens obtained from their respective site regardless of the mucosal lesion.

RESULTS

Consecutive suspected GI-GVHD patients with watery diarrhea (11 men and 5 women, mean age: 45.6 years, coexistent symptoms: nausea [38%] and exanthema [69%]) were enrolled. GI-GVHD was identified pathologically in 11 patients (69%), all of whom had pathological findings of GI-GVHD at the rectum. However, eight patients (73%) had pathological findings of GI-GVHD at both the ileum and the rectum and none had pathological findings of GI-GVHD at the ileum alone. The accuracies for a pathological diagnosis of GI-GVHD based on endoscopic features were 44%, 44%, and 38% at the proximal ileum, terminal ileum, and rectum, respectively. The severity of mucosal injury had no association with the diagnostic rate of pathological GI-GVHD at any site.

CONCLUSIONS

A pathological evaluation of the rectum but not the ileum may be important and useful for the accurate diagnosis of early GI-GVHD.

Comparison of Risk Factors Between Small Intestinal Ulcerative and Vascular Lesions in Occult Versus Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The detailed risk factors such as bleeding pattern, comorbidities, and medication usage of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) are largely unknown. We evaluated the risk factors related to ulcerative and vascular lesions of the small intestine diagnosed by capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted endoscopy in OGIB cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 390 OGIB cases (occult, n = 101; overt, n = 289) in our hospital between January 2005 and March 2011 using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the related risk factors.

RESULTS

In occult (n = 36) and overt (n = 120) OGIB cases, some lesions were detected in the small intestine. Ulcerative and vascular lesions were detected in both occult (n = 25, 69.4 %; n = 8, 22.2 %, respectively) and overt (n = 57, 47.5 %; n = 39, 32.5 %, respectively) cases. For ulcerative lesions, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as a risk factor in overt cases [odds ratio (OR) 2.974, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.522-5.809, P = 0.001]. For vascular lesions, lowest hemoglobin level (OR 0.634, 95 % CI 0.422-0.953, P = 0.028) and hematologic disease (OR 8.575, 95 % CI 1.076-68.309, P = 0.042) were identified as risk factors in occult cases, whereas hemodialysis (OR 3.71, 95 % CI 1.315-10.467, P = 0.013) was identified in overt cases. Additionally, liver cirrhosis was noted as a risk factor in both occult (OR 7.453, 95 % CI 1.213-45.773, P = 0.013) and overt (OR 4.900, 95 % CI 2.099-11.443, P < 0.001) OGIB cases.

CONCLUSION

There are differences in risk factors related to ulcerative versus vascular lesions in the small intestine in occult and overt OGIB cases. Differences were seen in both medication usage and comorbidities.

Application of balloon-assisted endoscopy in treatment of small intestinal diseases

For its special physiological structure, the small intestine had been regarded as an area inaccessible by digestive endoscopy for the detection and therapy. Recently, the clinical application of balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE) help realize the direct observation and endoscopic therapy for the total small intestine, which greatly improves the diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal diseases. In the current editorial, we provide several typical cases and give an overview of the application of BAE in the therapy of small intestinal diseases, which includes polypectomy for small intestinal polyps, dilatation and stenting for small intestinal strictures, endoscopic therapy for small intestinal bleeding and BAE assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).