1
|
Zhu Z, Xu S, Ren J, Jiang T, Zhang C, Yan Z. Anlotinib affects systemic lipid metabolism and induces lipid accumulation in human lung cancer cells. Lipids Health Dis 2023; 22:134. [PMID: 37612751 PMCID: PMC10464365 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-023-01907-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anlotinib has demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes in the treatment of lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and thyroid carcinoma. Several clinical studies have shown a relationship between anlotinib treatment and the occurrence of hyperlipidemia. The fundamental mechanisms, however, are still largely unclear. Here, the effect of anlotinib on lipid metabolism in an animal model and human cancer cells was evaluated and the role of lipid metabolism in the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib was investigated. METHODS The C57BL/6 J mouse model as well as A549 and H460 human lung cancer cell lines were used to examine the impact of anlotinib on lipid metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. Levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol in serum or cell samples were determined using assay kits. The expression levels of crucial genes and proteins involved in lipid metabolism were measured by quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. Furthermore, exogenous LDL and knockdown of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) were used in H460 cells to investigate the relevance of lipid metabolism in the anticancer efficacy of anlotinib. RESULTS Anlotinib caused hyperlipidemia in C57BL/6 J mice, possibly by downregulating hepatic LDLR-mediated uptake of LDL cholesterol. AMP-activated protein kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition may also be involved. Additionally, anlotinib enhanced sterol response element binding protein 1/2 nuclear accumulation as well as upregulated LDLR expression in A549 and H460 cells, which may be attributable to intracellular lipid accumulation. Knockdown of LDLR reduced intracellular cholesterol content, but interestingly, anlotinib significantly improved intracellular cholesterol accumulation in LDLR-knockdown cells. Both exogenous LDL and LDLR knockdown decreased the sensitivity of cells to anlotinib. CONCLUSIONS Anlotinib modulates host lipid metabolism through multiple pathways. Anlotinib also exerts a significant impact on lipid metabolism in cancer cells by regulating key transcription factors and metabolic enzymes. In addition, these findings suggest lipid metabolism is implicated in anlotinib sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongling Zhu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Shan Xu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Ren
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Teng Jiang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Cai Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhao Yan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
- Department of Continuing Education and Science and Technology Service, China Anti-Cancer Association, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pantano F, Santoni M, Procopio G, Rizzo M, Iacovelli R, Porta C, Conti A, Lugini A, Milella M, Galli L, Ortega C, Guida FM, Silletta M, Schinzari G, Verzoni E, Modica D, Crucitti P, Rauco A, Felici A, Ballatore V, Cascinu S, Tonini G, Carteni G, Russo A, Santini D. The changes of lipid metabolism in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with everolimus: a new pharmacodynamic marker? PLoS One 2015; 10:e0120427. [PMID: 25885920 PMCID: PMC4401714 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to assess the association between the baseline values and treatmentrelated modifications of total serum cholesterol (C), triglycerides (T), body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose level (FBG) and blood pressure (BP) levels and the outcome of patients treated with everolimus for mRCC. Methods 177 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Time to progression (TTP), clinical benefit (CB) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results Basal BMI was significantly higher in patients who experienced a CB (p=0,0145). C,T and C+T raises were significantly associated with baseline BMI (p=0.0412, 0.0283 and 0.0001). Median TTP was significantly longer in patients with T raise compared to patients without T (10 vs 6, p=0.030), C (8 vs 5, p=0.042) and C+T raise (10.9 vs 5.0, p=0.003). At the multivariate analysis, only C+T increase was associated with improved TTP (p=0.005). T raise (21.0 vs 14.0, p=0.002) and C+T increase (21.0 vs 14.0, p=0.006) were correlated with improved OS but were not significant at multivariate analysis. Conclusion C+T raise is an early predictor for everolimus efficacy for patients with mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pantano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Santoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Piazza Roma, 22,60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Mimma Rizzo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardarelli Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Department of Medical Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Conti
- Department of Clinical and Specialist Sciences, Urology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Piazza Roma, 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy
| | - Antonio Lugini
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo De Lellis Hospital, Via John Fitzgerald Kennedy, 17, 02100 Rieti, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Galli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma, 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Cinzia Ortega
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & Treatment (IRCC), Strada Provinciale, 142, 10060 Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Maria Guida
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Silletta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Verzoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Modica
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Pierfilippo Crucitti
- Department of Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Annamaria Rauco
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo De Lellis Hospital, Via John Fitzgerald Kennedy, 17, 02100 Rieti, Italy
| | - Alessandra Felici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Ballatore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & Treatment (IRCC), Strada Provinciale, 142, 10060 Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Piazza Roma, 22,60121 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Carteni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardarelli Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) represent the most frequently exploited targets in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Temsirolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR, and is a unique ester derivative of sirolimus, a macrocyclic lactone, with improved pharmaceutical properties, including stability and solubility. Temsirolimus binds to the cytoplasmic protein FKBP-12, and the complex binds and inhibits mTOR. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the clinical findings and safety of temsirolimus in RCC patients. EXPERT OPINION A Phase III clinical trial has demonstrated that temsirolimus has statistically significant advantages over treatment with IFN-α in RCC patients with poor prognosis, in terms of OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival), and tumor response. Median OS was improved 49% compared to IFN-α, and median PFS was approximately doubled. It is now considered the standard for RCC patients with poor prognostic features. The possibility that this agent is useful in metastatic non-clear cell carcinoma patients has also been suggested by a subset analysis of the pivotal Phase III trial. Studies in untreated favorable and intermediate risk clear cell and refractory mRCC patients are required.
Collapse
|