FDA's Approval of the First Biosimilar to Bevacizumab

Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is a complex and dynamic process regulated by various pro- and anti-angiogenic molecules, which plays a crucial role in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. With the advances in molecular and cellular biology, various biomolecules such as growth factors, chemokines, and adhesion factors involved in tumor angiogenesis has gradually been elucidated. Targeted therapeutic research based on these molecules has driven anti-angiogenic treatment to become a promising strategy in anti-tumor therapy. The most widely used anti-angiogenic agents include monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. However, the clinical benefit of this modality has still been limited due to several defects such as adverse events, acquired drug resistance, tumor recurrence, and lack of validated biomarkers, which impel further research on mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis, the development of multiple drugs and the combination therapy to figure out how to improve the therapeutic efficacy. Here, we broadly summarize various signaling pathways in tumor angiogenesis and discuss the development and current challenges of anti-angiogenic therapy. We also propose several new promising approaches to improve anti-angiogenic efficacy and provide a perspective for the development and research of anti-angiogenic therapy.

A bibliometric analysis of research progress on pharmacovigilance and cancer from 2002 to 2021

The complexity of cancer itself and treatment makes pharmacovigilance critical in oncology. Despite rapid progress on pharmacovigilance and cancer research in the past two decades, there has been no bibliometric analysis in this field. Therefore, based on the Web of Science database, we used CiteSpace, VOS-viewer and R-bibliometrix to analyze and visualize publications, and described the development trend and research hot spots in this field. 502 publications were included. The development of pharmacovigilance and cancer research has continued to grow. The USA has the largest number of publications and citations, followed by France and UK. Vanderbilt University and Sorbonne University are the institutions that contribute the most papers, and 5 of the top 10 high-yield institutions are from France. Salem JE and Lebrun-Vignes B of Sorbonne University have published the most papers, and they have a strong cooperative relationship. Salem JE has the highest H index. Drug Safety has the largest number of publications in the field of pharmacovigilance and cancer, with a high impact factor (IF). In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been identified as a hot topic and will continue to be maintained. This paper can help researchers get familiar with the current situation and trend of pharmacovigilance and cancer research, and provide valuable reference for the selection of future research directions.

Biosimilars in Oncology: Latest Trends and Regulatory Status

Biologic-based medicines are used to treat a variety of diseases and account for around one-quarter of the worldwide pharmaceutical market. The use of biologic medications among cancer patients has resulted in substantial advancements in cancer treatment and supportive care. Biosimilar medications (or biosimilars) are very similar to the reference biologic drugs, although they are not identical. As patent protection for some of the most extensively used biologics begins to expire, biosimilars have the potential to enhance access and provide lower-cost options for cancer treatment. Initially, regulatory guidelines were set up in Europe in 2003, and the first biosimilar was approved in 2006 in Europe. Many countries, including the United States of America (USA), Canada, and Japan, have adopted Europe's worldwide regulatory framework. The use of numerous biosimilars in the treatment and supportive care of cancer has been approved and, indeed, the count is set to climb in the future around the world. However, there are many challenges associated with biosimilars, such as cost, immunogenicity, lack of awareness, extrapolation of indications, and interchangeability. The purpose of this review is to provide an insight into biosimilars, which include various options available for oncology, and the associated adverse events. We compare the regulatory guidelines for biosimilars across the world, and also present the latest trends and challenges in medical oncology both now and in the future, which will assist healthcare professionals, payers, and patients in making informed decisions, increasing the acceptance of biosimilars in clinical practice, increasing accessibility, and speeding up the health and economic benefits associated with biosimilars.

Predictive value of chromosome 18q11.2-q12.1 loss for benefit from bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer; a post-hoc analysis of the randomized phase III-trial AGITG-MAX

The VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody bevacizumab is currently recommended for first‐line treatment of all metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Cost‐benefit ratio and side‐effects however necessitate patient selection. A large retrospective yet nonrandomized study showed that patients with loss of chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 in the tumor and treated with bevacizumab have 3 months improved median progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit compared to patients without this loss and/or treatment modality. Implementation for loss of chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 as a marker in clinical practice mandates evidence in a randomized controlled trial for bevacizumab. Of the trials with randomization of chemotherapy vs chemotherapy with bevacizumab, the AGITG‐MAX trial was the only one with tumor materials available. Chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 copy number status was measured for 256 AGITG‐MAX trial patients and correlated with PFS according to a predefined analysis plan with marker‐treatment interaction as the primary end‐point. Chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 losses were detected in 71% of patients (181/256) characteristic for mCRC. Consistent with the nonrandomized study, significant PFS benefit of bevacizumab was observed in patients with chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 loss (P = .009), and not in patients without 18q loss (P = .67). Although significance for marker‐treatment interaction was not reached (P_interaction = .28), hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of this randomized cohort (HR_interaction = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.39‐1.32) shows striking overlap with the nonrandomized study cohorts (HR_interaction = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.32‐0.8) supported by a nonsignificant Cochrane χ² test (P = .11) for heterogeneity. We conclude that post hoc analysis of the AGITG‐MAX RCT provides supportive evidence for chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 as a predictive marker for bevacizumab in mCRC patients.

Use of Biosimilar Medications in Oncology

PURPOSE

The increased number and expanded utilization of biosimilars raise important considerations for their safe and appropriate use in oncology practice. This report provides an update on currently approved oncology biosimilars and identifies current knowledge gaps in the management of patients with cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel was convened to review the medical literature and to provide a practical summary of currently approved biosimilar therapeutics for cancer treatment or supportive care in the United States.

RESULTS

A total of 17 cancer or cancer-related biosimilar products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2015. Despite years of clinical experience with oncology biosimilars, variance in their use persists. ASCO supports that biosimilars and reference products are considered equally efficacious for the purpose of inclusion in ASCO clinical practice guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The use of biosimilars might provide competitive, lower-cost alternatives to biologics used in cancer care, and specific mention in ASCO guidelines and other evidence products is supported where appropriate.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of LY01008, a candidate bevacizumab biosimilar, with its reference product Avastin® in healthy Chinese male subjects

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab, an inhibitor of angiogenesis, has been approved in several anti-cancer therapies. This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, safety, and immunogenicity of a bevacizumab biosimilar, LY01008, with those of European Union - approved bevacizumab (Avastin®) in healthy Chinese males.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this double-blind, open-label, parallel-group study, healthy Chinese male subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either LY01008 or Avastin® 3 mg/kg intravenously. Primary study endpoints were PK parameters such as the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞), AUC from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-t), and maximum serum concentration (C_max). Secondary study endpoints included safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve subjects were randomized to receive LY01008 (n = 56) or Avastin® (n = 56). The 90% CIs of the GMRs of AUC_0-t, AUC_0-∞, and C_max of LY01008 to Avastin® were all within the bioequivalence margin. Other PK parameters, safety, and immunogenicity profiles were comparable across the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated equivalent PK, comparable safety, and similar immunogenicity of LY01008 to Avastin® in healthy subjects, thus paving the way for further clinical evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT05110118).

Anti-angiogenesis Function of Ononin via Suppressing the MEK/Erk Signaling Pathway

Angiogenesis is a complicated pathological process and plays an important role in modulating tumor development. Flavonoids, sharing the basic functional group with estrogen, have been utilized as chemopreventive agents to inhibit endothelial cell angiogenesis and also suppress tumor cell proliferation. Ononin, also referred to as formononetin-7-O-β-d-glucoside, is one of the bioactive chemicals found within many functional food or plants. The anticancer functions of ononin have been reported both in vitro and in vivo. However, the anti-angiogenetic properties of ononin have not been reported. The possible efficacies of ononin against angiogenesis was verified in cultured endothelial cells. Ononin suppressed vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced HUVEC migration, invasion. and tube formation activity after 48 h. The apoptosis rate and specific markers, i.e., Bax/Bc-2 ratio, cleaved caspase 3/9 (Cl-caspase 3/9), and cytochrome c (Cyto c), were enhanced in the ononin-treated group. On the other hand, the protein expressions levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) were restricted after ononin treatment for 2 days in VEGF-pretreated endothelial cells. In summary, ononin acts as a candidate for angiogenetic-related disease prevention and treatment.

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of HLX04 Versus Reference Bevacizumab in Combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Study

Background

HLX04 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab.

Objective

This phase III study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of HLX04 compared with reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

In this double-blind, parallel-group study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive HLX04 or bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks when combined with XELOX; 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks when combined with mFOLFOX6). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at week 36 (PFSR_36w) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Prespecified equivalence margins of PFSR_36w were set as − 11 to 15% (rate difference) and 0.8 to 1.25 (rate ratio). Secondary endpoints included efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics.

Results

A total of 677 patients were randomized (HLX04 n = 340; bevacizumab n = 337) between April 2018 and April 2020. PFSR_36w was 46.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.1–51.8) with HLX04 and 50.7% (95% CI 45.4–56.1) with bevacizumab. The rate difference (− 4.2%; 90% CI − 10.6 to 2.1) and rate ratio (0.92; 90% CI 0.80–1.05) both fell within the prespecified equivalence margins. No notable differences were observed between treatment groups in any efficacy endpoints or their subgroup analyses. Safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between the two treatment groups.

Conclusions

HLX04 demonstrated equivalent efficacy with similar safety and immunogenicity profiles to reference bevacizumab among patients with recurrent/metastatic CRC, thus offering an alternative treatment option to patients.

Trial registration

Chinadrugtrials.org.cn, CTR20171503 (18 March 2018); ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03511963 (30 April 2018).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-021-00484-9.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. Approximately 20% of patients with CRC have metastases at their first visit. Bevacizumab is a biologic antibody approved in many countries for the treatment of metastatic CRC. However, high treatment costs significantly limit patient access to bevacizumab. Therefore, HLX04, a potential bevacizumab biosimilar, which is almost identical to bevacizumab but less expensive and more accessible, has been developed. This randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy (ability of a drug to produce the desired treatment effects), safety, and immunogenicity (ability of a drug to induce immune response that would affect its efficacy and safety) of HLX04 compared with the reference bevacizumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic CRC. Efficacy of the tested drug was evaluated by comparing the proportion of patients without disease progression or death at week 36 (PFSR_36w). Safety was monitored using adverse events and other clinical evaluations. Immunogenicity was assessed by the incidence of antidrug antibodies. Of the 677 patients enrolled in the study, 340 received HLX04 and 337 received bevacizumab. Statistical analyses showed that HLX04 was equivalent to bevacizumab in efficacy evaluations (the difference in PFSR_36w between the two treatment groups fell within the prespecified “equivalence margins”). Moreover, the two treatments were similar with respect to safety and immunogenicity evaluations. In summary, patients responded equally well to HLX04 and bevacizumab, supporting the development of HLX04 as a proposed biosimilar to bevacizumab for patients with recurrent/metastatic CRC.

A pharmacokinetics study of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O vs EU-bevacizumab and US-bevacizumab

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-specific angiogenesis in some cancers. MYL-1402O is a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar.

METHODS

The primary objective of this single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, phase 1 study in healthy male volunteers was to evaluate bioequivalence of MYL-1402O to EU and US-reference bevacizumab, and EU-reference bevacizumab to US-reference bevacizumab. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0-∞). Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using general linear models of analysis of variance. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 111 enrolled subjects, 110 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis (MYL-1402O, n = 37; EU-reference bevacizumab, n = 36; US-reference bevacizumab, n = 37). Bioequivalence was demonstrated between MYL-1402O and EU-reference bevacizumab, MYL-1402O and US-reference bevacizumab, and between EU- and US-reference bevacizumab where least squares mean ratios of AUC_0-∞ were close to 1, and 90% CIs were within the equivalence range (0.80-1.25). Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC from 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC_0-t], peak serum concentration [C_max], time to C_max, elimination rate constant, and elimination half-life) were also comparable, with 90% CIs for ratios of AUC_0-t and C_max within 80-125%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all three treatment groups and were consistent with clinical data for bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

MYL-1402O was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to EU-reference bevacizumab and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers. No new significant safety issues emerged (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02469987; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT, 2014-005621-12; June 12, 2015).

Arterial aneurysm and dissection with systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: A review of cases reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and published in the literature

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved multiple systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors since 2004 to treat various malignancies. Inhibition of the VEGF signaling pathway can result in impairment of vascular wall integrity through medial degeneration and endothelial dysfunction, potentially resulting in arterial (including aortic) aneurysm/dissection. We performed a postmarketing review to evaluate arterial aneurysm/dissection as a potential safety risk for patients with cancer treated with VEGF inhibitors. We searched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and literature for reports of arterial (including aortic) aneurysm/dissection with VEGF inhibitors currently approved by the FDA for a cancer indication. We identified 240 cases of arterial aneurysm/dissection associated with VEGF inhibitors. The median time to onset of an arterial aneurysm/dissection event from the initiation of a VEGF inhibitor was 94 days (range 1-1955 days). Notably, 22% (53/240) of cases reported fatal outcomes related to arterial aneurysm/dissection. We determined the drug-event association as probable in 15 cases that lacked relevant confounding factors for arterial aneurysm/dissection, which is supported by unremarkable computed tomography (CT) findings prior to starting VEGF inhibitor therapy, despite nondrug-associated background arterial aneurysm/dissection generally demonstrating preexisting arterial abnormalities. FAERS and literature case-level evidence suggests that VEGF inhibitors may have contributed to arterial aneurysm/dissection, as a class effect, based on short onset relative to natural history of disease and biologic plausibility. Cardiovascular and oncology healthcare professionals should be aware of this rare, but life-threatening safety risk associated with VEGF inhibitors.

Equivalent efficacy study of QL1101 and bevacizumab on untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

This phase 3 study aimed to test equivalence in efficacy and safety for QL1101, a bevacizumab analogue in Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with either QL1101 or bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg every 3-week for 6 cycles. This was followed by maintenance treatment with single agent QL1101 every 3-week. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end-points being progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Of 675 patients, 535 eligible patients were randomized to the QL1101 group (n = 269) and bevacizumab group (n = 266). ORRs were 52.8% and 56.8%, respectively, for the QL1101 and bevacizumab groups, with an ORR hazard ratio 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.8-0131.1). The PFS, OS, DCR, and AEs were comparable between the 2 groups, which remained the same after stratification according to epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or smoking history.

CONCLUSIONS

QL1101 showed similar efficacy and safety profiles as compared to bevacizumab among Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Clinical and treatment characteristics of patients treated with the first therapeutic oncology biosimilars bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns in the US

Background:

In July 2019, bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns were marketed in the USA as the first therapeutic oncology biosimilars. We aimed to investigate the initial real-world use of bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns for cancer management in US oncology practices.

Methods:

A retrospective, observational analysis of data from US cancer patients (⩾18 years of age) was carried out to describe the use of bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns during the first 12 months following their market entry, using structured data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database.

Results:

A total of 2952 and 2997 patients with recorded use of bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns, respectively, were included in the analysis. The first use of bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns was in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) within 10 days of market availability and in a patient with early stage breast cancer (eBC) within 4 days, respectively. The use of these biosimilars was observed across all approved cancer indications; 68% of bevacizumab-awwb users were those diagnosed with mCRC and 72% of trastuzumab-anns users were those diagnosed with eBC. Approximately half the patients were previously exposed to reference product (RP) prior to initiation of bevacizumab-awwb or trastuzumab-anns. Among pre-exposed patients, the majority received the biosimilars [bevacizumab-awwb (63–85%) or trastuzumab-anns (75–81%)] within 28 days of the last infusion of the RP. For both biosimilars, no major differences were observed in patient characteristics between RP-naïve and pre-exposed patients.

Conclusion:

Initial evidence from the first 12 months following market entry suggests rapid clinical adoption of bevacizumab-awwb and trastuzumab-anns across all approved tumor types. Usage of these two biosimilars was observed in both RP-naïve patients and patients who were previously treated with RP, with no distinctive differences in patient characteristics between the two groups.

A video abstract is available for this article as part of the Kanjintionline supplemental material.

Possible Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for the Management of Cervical Cancer

Introduction:

Cervical cancer is the most prevalent cancer in the world due to unusual extension of cervical cell. Cervical cancer occurs due to exposure of HPV (Human papillomavirus). According to WHO, it is the 4th most ordinary cancer in women. In 2018, approx 6.6% of population was affected around the world and 570,000 new cases were reported. In low and middle-income countries, 90% of cervical cancer deaths occur.

Methods:

Despite various factors that cause cervical cancer are included exposure to HPV, dysregulation of CASPASE enzyme, elevated expression of IAPs (Inhibitor apoptotic protein), E6 and E7 gene of HPV, inhibition of p53, BAK, p16 upregulation, CDK-inactivation causing cervical cancer, role of VEGF, role of estrogen and its receptor in cervical cancer.

Results:

Cervical cancer can be screened by Pep test. There are various therapies that can be used to treat cervical cancer. As these therapies have various side effects, so the world is moving to herbal formulations to treat cervical cancer.

Conclusion:

In this study, we will discuss cervical cancer, its cause, symptoms, pathophysiology and treatments. Early screening and detection can help in reducing the overall burden of cervical cancer in the near future.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1101 with bevacizumab in healthy male subjects

PURPOSE

This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics of QL1101, a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, with Avastin^® sourced from Roche Diagnostics GmbH.

METHODS

In this double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study, healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1101 or Avastin^® 3 mg/kg intravenously. Pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted for 85 days, with additional safety and immunogenicity assessments until day 90. Primary study endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-last), and maximum serum concentration (C_max). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was shown if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the C_0-max, AUC_0-last, and AUC_0-∞ were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80-125.00%.

RESULTS

A total of 82 subjects were randomized to the following groups: 42 to QL1101 and 40 to Avastin^®. The 90% CIs of the GMRs of AUC_0-∞, AUC_0-last, and C_max of QL1101 and Avastin® were (97.8%, 107.0%), (94.5%, 106.9%), and (94.1%, 107.3%), respectively, which were all within the bioequivalence margin. The incidence of adverse events was 90.5% and 95.0% in the QL1101 and Avastin® groups, respectively. Mean serum concentration-time profiles, secondary pharmacokinetic parameters, and safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable across the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated the pharmacokinetic equivalence of QL1101 to Avastin^®. QL1101 (3 mg/kg, iv) is safe and tolerable in healthy Chinese subjects. These data support the further clinical evaluation of QL1101 as a bevacizumab biosimilar.

Current and future roles of biosimilars in oncology practice

Biologics have been used increasingly in the treatment and supportive care of cancer; however, their high cost places a significant burden on healthcare systems. The expiration of patents for biologics has led to the development of biosimilars, with the aim of reducing cost and increasing accessibility to novel treatments, which are affordable for a greater number of patients. Biosimilars are highly similar but not identical to the reference products; therefore, strict regulatory requirements have been formed for their approval. This ensures that there are no clinically meaningful differences compared with respective biologics, with regard to purity, safety and efficacy. In 2003, a regulatory framework for the approval of biosimilars was established in Europe, whereas the USA did not implement a framework until 2009, when the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act was formed. A number of biosimilars have currently been approved in oncology and the number is expected to rise in the near future. More than 10 years of evidence has revealed that biosimilars are safe and effective; however healthcare professionals need to be further educated to eliminate potential misconceptions and integrate biosimilars into routine clinical practice. The present review aims to provide an overview of the biosimilars used in Europe and the USA, present their main benefits and challenges, and discuss their current and future roles in medical oncology.

Part 1: Physicochemical characterization of bevacizumab in undiluted 25 mg/mL drug product solutions: Comparison of originator with a biosimilar candidate

The biosimilarity assessment of the physicochemical properties of high-concentration biopharmaceuticals is usually performed with measurements on diluted solutions, at concentrations below 1 mg/mL. In this study 13 orthogonal, spectroscopy and particle size determination methods were used to characterize the structure and aggregation of undiluted, 25 mg/mL bevacizumab drug products Avastin® manufactured in the USA and in Europe, and ABX-BEV, a bevacizumab biosimilar candidate produced by Apobiologix Inc. Secondary structure, conformation and the potential occurrence of chemical degradation of the monoclonal antibodies were characterized and compared using infrared spectroscopy, intrinsic fluorescence and ANS fluorescence spectroscopy. Protein aggregation and particulate matter in the monoclonal antibody solutions were compared using UV-Vis absorbance, 90° light-scattering, nanoparticle tracking analysis, Nile red fluorescence microscopy, particle flow imaging, ultrasound resonance technology and a new scanner-based method that visualizes protein aggregates inside unopened vials. A data wheel representation was used to plot in one figure the results from the multiple analytical methods and to highlight differences between samples. The 25 mg/mL Avastin® drug product is stored at 2-8 °C during its 2-year shelf life. After a thermal stress of 4 weeks at 40 °C the ABX-BEV solution was turbid, containing particles of 20-100 μm diameter, accompanied by strong changes in antibody structural properties. Characterization of unstressed samples stored at 2-8 °C showed that the physicochemical properties of bevacizumab in ABX-BEV and the two originator drug products were similar, the observed differences between the originators being in the same range as those between ABX-BEV and the originator. To investigate the similarity of the antibodies under stress conditions, a freeze-thaw study was performed. Although freeze-thawing of bevacizumab products is prohibited by the package insert, after two freeze-thaw cycles (24 °C to -80 °C) small changes in the structural and aggregation properties of bevacizumab were observed, changes that were similar for the originator and ABX-BEV. Our study showed a good similarity of the investigated physicochemical properties of bevacizumab in originator and ABX-BEV products. It also provides an analytical approach, based on orthogonal methods, to compare high-concentration formulations of monoclonal antibodies.

What Does the Pipeline Promise about Upcoming Biosimilar Antibodies in Oncology?

The introduction of biosimilars of biological agents for which the patents and exclusivity periods have expired is an attractive way of reducing healthcare spending through price competition with the reference product. In oncology, biosimilars of growth factors for supportive therapy were the pioneers; now, monoclonal antibody biosimilars are conquering the market. In Europe, this is currently limited to biosimilars of the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and rituximab. However, the pipeline is full and several monoclonal antibody biosimilars in oncology are now in late-stage development. We are expecting not only more biosimilar versions of the top 3 blockbuster monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab, rituximab and bevacizumab, to enter the market; as patent expiration of multiple other cancer biologicals will occur in the next few years, the biosimilar landscape will become much more diversified. Several biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies used in targeted therapy such as cetuximab, pertuzumab, or denosumab are in early development.

High-Throughput Bioanalysis of Bevacizumab in Human Plasma Based on Enzyme-Linked Aptamer Assay Using Anti-Idiotype DNA Aptamer

We propose a highly selective, sensitive, accurate, and high-throughput bioanalysis method for bevacizumab utilizing an anti-idiotype DNA aptamer. With this method, bevacizumab in a plasma sample was reacted in a 96-well plate immobilized with the aptamer and further reacted with a protein A-HRP conjugate. The resulting HRP activity was colorimetrically detected using a microplate reader. The calibration curve of bevacizumab ranged from 0.05 to 5.0 μg/mL, and showed a good correlation coefficient ( r² = 1.000). The limit of detection was 2.09 ng/mL. We also demonstrated both the possibility of highly sensitive detection using luminol chemiluminescence and the repeated use of affinity plates. The proposed method is applicable for planning optimal therapeutic programs and for an evaluation of the biological equivalencies in the development of biosimilars.

A comparative pharmacokinetic study of DRL_BZ, a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab, with Avastin® (EU and US) in healthy male subjects

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRL_BZ with that of EU-approved (reference medicinal product; RMP) and US-licensed (reference product; RP) bevacizumab (Avastin^® ) in healthy male subjects.

METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1 study (BZ-01-001), men aged 20-45 years were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion of 1 mg kg^-1 of bevacizumab as DRL_BZ, RMP or RP. A total of 149 subjects were randomized (DRL_BZ, 50; RMP, 50; RP, 49). Primary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (C_max ), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinity (AUC_(0-∞) ), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to last quantifiable concentration (AUC_(0-t) ). Secondary objectives were to compare the safety and immunogenicity of DRL_BZ with those of the reference products.

RESULTS

Primary PK parameters were comparable across groups, and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of the primary PK endpoints were within the pre-specified equivalence margins (80-125%) for all pairwise comparisons (DRL_BZ vs. RMP, DRL_BZ vs. RP and RMP vs. RP). No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. Similar numbers of subjects reported similar numbers of treatment-emergent adverse events in the three treatment groups. One subject who received DRL_BZ had anti-drug antibodies at the Day 85 visit; however, no anti-drug antibodies were detected in this subject at the 12-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

PK, safety and immunogenicity of DRL_BZ were comparable to EU-approved and US-licensed bevacizumab in healthy male subjects.