Health-Related Quality of Life Impact from Adding Bevacizumab to Cisplatin-Pemetrexed in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the MAPS IFCT-GFPC-0701 Phase III Trial

Association between Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) treatment and depression among cancer patients in China: An outpatient-based cross-sectional study

Depression is a prevalent condition among cancer patients and significantly impacts their quality of life. Traditional Chinese Medicine, particularly Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM), has shown potential in both anti-tumor and anti-depressive effects. However, there is a dearth of scientific literature exploring the association between CHM treatment and depression in cancer patients. This study aims to investigate the relationship between CHM treatment and depression in cancer patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer outpatients at Longhua Hosiptal, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from June 2020 to April 2021 (Ethical approval number: 2020LCSY057). All patients signed informed consent and completed The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Hamilton depression scale was evaluated depression by psychiatrists. The power of the sample size was determined using Gpower statistical and SPSS were used for statistical analysis. A total of 809 completed the study. Gender, medical insurance, the classification of time since diagnosis, ECOG, cancer stage, metastasis, gene mutation, treatment plan and CHM treatment were an important factor affecting depression (P < .05). Further analysis investigated the impact of CHM treatment on depression. There were 374 enrolled in CHM group and 435 enrolled in Non-CHM group. The assessment results of Hamilton depression scale and EORTC QLQ-C30 in CHM group were superior to those in Non-CHM group. The morbidity of depression is 50.27% in CHM group and 66.44% in Non-CHM group. After adjusting for potential confounders (gender, medical insurance, cancer stage, etc.), CHM treatment indicated negative correlation with depression (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5-0.9, P = .020). The interaction effects within each subgroup were no significantly affect the relationship between CHM treatment and depression (P > .05). CHM treatment was an independent protective factor for depression in cancer patients, and lead to better quality of life for cancer patients.

Identification and Characterisation of Infiltrating Immune Cells in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Using Spatial Transcriptomics

Increasing evidence strongly supports the key role of the tumour microenvironment in response to systemic therapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The tumour microenvironment is a complex tapestry of immune cells, some of which can suppress T-cell immunity to negatively impact ICI therapy. The immune component of the tumour microenvironment, although poorly understood, has the potential to reveal novel insights that can impact the efficacy and safety of ICI therapy. Successful identification and validation of these factors using cutting-edge spatial and single-cell technologies may enable the development of broad acting adjunct therapies as well as personalised cancer immunotherapies in the near future. In this paper we describe a protocol built upon Visium (10x Genomics) spatial transcriptomics to map and characterise the tumour-infiltrating immune microenvironment in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Using ImSig tumour-specific immune cell gene signatures and BayesSpace Bayesian statistical methodology, we were able to significantly improve immune cell identification and spatial resolution, respectively, improving our ability to analyse immune cell interactions within the tumour microenvironment.

Immunotherapy vs. Chemotherapy in Subsequent Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Which Is Better?

(1) Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive tumor arising from the pleural surface. For relapsed MPM, there is no accepted standard of- are for subsequent treatment. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy, targeting drugs, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as subsequent therapy for relapsed MPM. (2) Methods: The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched several acknowledged databases. Primary outcomes were defined as overall median progressive survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) in different treatment groups. Secondary outcomes were defined as objective response rate (ORR), the proportion of stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). (3) Results: Ultimately, 43 articles were selected for the meta-analysis. According to the results of a pooled analysis of single-arm studies, ICIs showed a slight advantage in mOS, while chemotherapy showed a slight advantage in mPFS (mOS: 11.2 m vs. 10.39 m and mPFS: 4.42 m vs. 5.08 m for ICIs group and chemotherapy group, respectively). We identified only a few studies that directly compared the efficacy of ICIs with that of chemotherapy, and ICIs did not show significant benefits over chemotherapy based on mOS. (4) Conclusions: Based on current evidence, we considered that immunotherapy might not be superior to chemotherapy as a subsequent therapy for relapsed MPM. Although several studies investigated the efficacy of ICIs, targeting drugs, and chemotherapy in relapsed MPM, there was still no standard of care. Further randomized control trials with consistent criteria and outcomes are recommended to guide subsequent therapy in relapsed MPM and identify patients with certain characteristics that might benefit from such subsequent therapy.

Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life.

RESULTS

A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants' tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.

Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies

In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.

Mesothelioma Risk Score: A New Prognostic Pretreatment, Clinical-Molecular Algorithm for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

Prognostic models for malignant pleural mesothelioma have been limited to demographics, symptoms, and laboratory values. We hypothesize higher accuracy using both tumor and patient characteristics. The mesothelioma prognostic test (MPT) and molecular subtype based on claudin-15-to-vimentin expression ratio are molecular signatures associated with survival. Tumor volume (TV) has improved performance compared with clinical staging, whereas neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is prognostic for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

Tumor specimens and clinical data were collected prospectively from patients who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy and decortication (PD) during 2007 to 2014. MPT and claudin-15-to-vimentin ratio were determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, whereas TV was assessed from preoperative scans. Risk groups were derived from combinations of adverse factors on the basis of the Cox model. Predictive accuracy was assessed using Harrell's c-index.

RESULTS

MPT, molecular subtype, TV, and NLR were independently prognostic in patients with EPP (N = 191), suggesting equal weighting in a final three-group model (c = 0.644). In the PD cohort (N = 193), MPT poor risk combined with TV greater than 200 cm³ was associated with triple the risk compared with other subgroups (hazard ratio = 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.70-5.09, p < 0.001) persisting when adjusted for molecular subtype, NLR, performance status, and serum albumin to yield a final three-group model (c = 0.641). The EPP and PD models achieved higher accuracy than published models (c ≤ 0.584, c ≤ 0.575) and pathologic staging (c = 0.554, c = 0.571).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel models use pretreatment parameters obtained from minimally invasive biopsy, imaging, and blood tests to evaluate the expected outcome of each type of surgery in newly diagnosed patients and improve stratification on clinical trials.

A Review of Pharmacologic Management in the Treatment of Mesothelioma

OPINION STATEMENT

Mesothelioma is a rare and severe form of cancer that is associated with asbestos exposure. Approximately 2500 Americans die annually from this condition with a median survival of 1 year. The latency period of this disease ranges anywhere from 20 to 70 years, with shorter latency periods associated with a higher exposure intensity to asbestos. Therefore, cases of mesothelioma are expected in the coming decades. This highlights the need for clinicians to understand the pharmacologic regimens available for treating this rare, yet serious malignancy. With multiple treatment regimens available in the treatment of this condition, clinicians should take an evidence-based approach and consider the totality of evidence and safety information while considering the best patient-centered approach for treatment. This article provides a review of current pharmacologic treatment options available for mesothelioma and goes into detail about the recommended medication regimens and dosages and the available evidence of efficacy, effectiveness, and/or safety and estimates the annual cost of treatment for these medications on the U.S. healthcare system per patient. A brief introduction is provided for several promising agents currently under investigation for mesothelioma as well.

Evaluation of long-term living conditions in patients treated for localised prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the evolution of living conditions (LC) in long-term survivors of localised prostate cancer 10 years after treatment compared with those of a same-age control group from the general population.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-seven patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2001 were selected in 11 French cancer registries. They were matched with controls randomly selected for age and residency. Both patients and controls completed a self-administered LC questionnaire concerning their familial, social and professional life, and general and specific quality of life (QoL) and anxiety and depression questionnaires.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, patients reported more sexual modifications (p < .0001), but without any difference in marital status. Patients' circle of friends was more stable than that of the controls (91% vs. 63%; p < .0001) and patients reported fewer friendship modifications than controls (p < .0006). Their professional and physical activities were also preserved. They reported more anxiolytic intake (p = .002) but did not consult their general practitioner more often. Type of specialist consulted differed in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated for localised prostate cancer had the same living conditions as men of the same age. Their social life was satisfying on the whole, albeit they reported more sexual difficulties than their counterparts.

Antiangiogeneic Strategies in Mesothelioma

There is a strong rationale for inhibiting angiogenesis in mesothelioma. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an autocrine growth factor in mesothelioma and a potent mitogen for mesothelial cells. Further, the abnormal tumor vasculature promotes raised interstitial pressure and hypoxia, which may be detrimental to both penetration and efficacy of anticancer agents. Antiangiogenic agents have been trialed in mesothelioma for close to two decades, with early phase clinical trials testing vascular targeting agents, the VEGF-A targeting monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, and numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors, many with multiple targets. None of these have shown efficacy which has warranted further development as single agents in any line of therapy. Whilst a randomized phase II trial combining the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib with platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy was positive, these results were not confirmed in a subsequent phase III study. The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed with bevacizumab, in appropriately selected patients, remains the only anti-angiogenic combination showing efficacy in mesothelioma. Extensive efforts to identify biomarkers of response have not yet been successful.