Response to Standard Therapies and Comprehensive Genomic Analysis for Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions

Debate on first-line treatment strategies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: An expert panel meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The front-line treatment options and regulatory approval scenario for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have rapidly evolved in the recent months, with newly presented positive trial results of novel compounds and combination strategies in the setting of common activating mutations, uncommon mutations, and exon 20 insertions. In this context, international lively debate is emerging on how to choose among the available regimens, based on efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel was held in July 2024 to review data on front-line regimens in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, including common, uncommon and exon 20 insertions. The panel discussed available evidence, and reached common considerations for clinical practice and clinical research.

RESULTS

In the setting of EGFR common activating mutations, all panelists agreed that single agent osimertinib, the combination of osimertinib with platinum-pemetrexed, and the combination of amivantamab and lazertinib, are first-line treatment options. Overall, panelists defined characteristics of patients in which combination treatments should be avoided. Subsequent treatment strategies at disease progression were discussed according to the different front-line options. With regards to uncommon EGFR mutations, panelists agreed that afatinib remains the only drug with phase 3 results available, and that afatinib and osimertinib are the preferred first-line options. In EGFR exon20 insertion positive disease, the combination of carboplatin, pemetrexed and amivantamab has been identified as the preferred front-line treatment, with second-line amivantamab to be used in the second-line setting whenever not available in front-line. The panelists defined priorities in clinical research, with high priority attributed to investigating resistance mechanisms, novel generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and selection biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Different toxicity profiles and sequential strategies were considered, together with efficacy results, to reach common considerations for the front-line treatment strategies in EGFR mutant NSCLC, however clinical research should be prioritized to identify further selection features.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy may be efficacious for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20: A retrospective analysis

ObjectiveThe sensitivity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy is low in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins). This study aims at investigating the effectiveness of the combination of ICI and chemotherapy (ICI-combined regimen) in a real-world population of NSCLC patients harboring near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins from April 2016 to March 2021 at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, China. A total of 126 cases of EGFR ex20ins were screened from 1610 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and 62 cases were further analyzed for different therapeutic efficacy.ResultsThe first-line ICI-combined regimen showed marked efficacy for near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20, with an ORR of 71.4% and a mPFS of 11.5 months, compared to ORRs of 12.5% for traditional targeted therapy (P = .003) and 18.8% for chemotherapy (P = .013). The first-line mPFS of traditional EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy were only 5.6 and 5.8 months, respectively. Similar results were observed for any-line therapy of ICI-combined regimen, with an ORR of 80%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of any-line therapy of ICI-combined regimen was 11.5 months, which were significantly longer than that of traditional targeted therapy (4.5 months, P = .026) and chemotherapy (5.0 months, P = .013).ConclusionsICI-combined regimen may be superior compared to targeted therapy and chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC with near-loop insertions of EGFR exon 20. Further exploration is warranted to confirm the efficacy of ICI-combined regimen.

Tumor immune microenvironment of NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions may predict efficacy of first-line ICI-combined regimen

OBJECTIVES

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were resistant to monotherapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, recent reports have shown that the combination of ICI and chemotherapy (ICI-combined regimen) exhibited certain efficacy for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. The mechanisms behind this phenomenon have not been thoroughly clarified. Hence, we conducted this study tofind correlations between the tumor immune microenvironment of EGFR ex20ins and the efficacy of ICI-combined regimen.

METHODS

We performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence staining (mIF) to investigate the immune microenvironment of NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, L858R, and EGFR wild-type. We analyzed 15 treatment-naïve NSCLC samples utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Another 30 cases of EGFR L858R and 4 cases of wild-type were recruited to compare the immune microenvironment with that of EGFR ex20ins (28 cases) by mIF.

RESULTS

We observed that cell components, function and interactions varied between EGFR ex20ins, L858R, and wild-type NSCLC.We discovered similar T cell and CD8+ T cell distributions among groups but found noninferior or even better T cell activation in ex20ins patients. Infiltrating CD8+ FOXP3- T cells were significantly lower in the tumor region of EGFR ex20ins compared to wild-type. T cells from the ex20ins group had a greater tendency to promote cancer cell inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) compared to wild-type group. For macrophages, there were more M2-like macrophages in ex20ins patients. M1-like macrophages in ex20ins group produced fewer antitumor cytokines than in other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The immune microenvironment of EGFR ex20ins is more suppressive than that of L858R and wild-type, suggesting that ICI monotherapy may not be sufficient for these patients. ICI-combined regimen might be a treatment option for EGFR ex20ins due to tumor-promoting inflammation and noninferior T cell functions in the immune microenvironment.

Comparison of Clinicopathogenomic Features and Treatment Outcomes of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Single-Institution Experience

PURPOSE

Exon 20 insertion mutations (E20ins) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become more important with emergence of novel agents targeting E20ins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC patients with E20ins were included. EGFR E20ins was identified by two methods, next-generation sequencing (NGS) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while HER2 E20ins was done by NGS only.

RESULTS

Between December 2013 and July 2021, E20ins were identified in 107 patients at Asan Medical Center; 67 EGFR E20ins and 40 HER2 E20ins. Out of 32 patients with EGFR E20ins who had tested both PCR and NGS, 17 were identified only through NGS and the other 15 through both tests, giving a discordance rate of 53.1%. There was no clinically significant difference in clinicopathologic features between EGFR and HER2 E20ins; both were observed more frequently in adenocarcinoma, female and never-smokers. Brain metastases were evident at diagnosis in 31.8% of EGFR E20ins and 27.5% of HER2 E20ins, respectively. Platinum-based doublets demonstrated objective response rates (ORR) of 13.3% with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months for EGFR E20ins and 35.3% with 4.7 months for HER2 E20ins, respectively. In contrast, novel EGFR E20ins-targeted agents exhibited an ORR of 46.2% with a median PFS of 5.4 months, while HER2-targeted agents showed an ORR of 50% with that of 7.0 months.

CONCLUSION

Identification of EGFR and HER2 E20ins is more important as their targeted therapies improved outcomes. Upfront NGS test as a comprehensive molecular approach is strongly warranted.

Current status and breakthroughs in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Recently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged as effective treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This progress has been facilitated by the rapid development of diagnostic and therapeutic technologies and the continuous research and development of new drugs, leading to a new era in precision medicine for NSCLC. This is a breakthrough for patients with common mutations in the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in NSCLC. Consequently, the use of targeted drugs has significantly improved survival. Nevertheless, certain rare genetic mutations are referred to as EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations, which differ in structure from conventional EGFR gene mutations, namely, exon 19 deletion mutations (19-Del) and exon 21 point mutations. Owing to their distinct structural characteristics, patients harboring these EGFR ex20ins mutations are unresponsive to traditional tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. This particular group of patients did not fall within the scope of their applicability. However, the activating A763_Y764insFQEA mutation elicits a more pronounced response than mutations in the near and far regions of the C-helix immediately following it and should, therefore, be treated differently. Currently, there is a lack of effective treatments for EGFR ex20ins mutations NSCLC. The efficacy of chemotherapy has been relatively favorable, whereas the effectiveness of immunotherapy remains ambiguous owing to inadequate clinical data. In addition, the efficacy of the first- and second-generation targeted drugs remains limited. However, third-generation and novel targeted drugs have proven to be effective. Although novel EGFR-TKIs are expected to treat EGFR ex20ins mutations in patients with NSCLC, they face many challenges. The main focus of this review is on emerging therapies that target NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins and highlight major ongoing clinical trials while also providing an overview of the associated challenges and research advancements in this area.

Uncommon and Rare EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with a Focus on Exon 20 Insertions and the Phase 3 PAPILLON Trial: The State of the Art

Uncommon (ucEGFRmuts) and rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations account for 10-15% of diagnosed cases and consist of a heterogeneous group represented by several clusters within exons 18-21 (e.g., exon 18 point mutations, exon 21 L861X, exon 20 S768I), as well as exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins). Their incidence is under molecular and clinical investigation following recent findings that reported an increase of sensitivity and specificity of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods. Consequently, their detection allows for the selection of emerging treatment options to significantly improve patients' outcomes in these particular subgroups of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Specifically, this commentary is focused on the notable progress of the Phase 3 PAPILLON study that showed primary efficacy results from amivantamab, a bispecific antibody with specific binding and affinity to extracellular domains of EGFR and MET, plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting for EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients, as compared with chemotherapy alone, thus becoming the new standard of care in this group of patients.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation

The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has greatly changed the clinical outlook for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unlike the most common EGFR mutations, such as exon 19 deletion (del19) and exon 21 L858R point mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (EGFR ex20ins) is a rare mutation of EGFR. Due to its structural specificity, it exhibits primary resistance to traditional epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), leading to poor overall survival prognosis for patients. In recent years, there has been continuous progress in the development of new drugs targeting EGFR ex20ins, bringing new hope for the treatment of this patient population. In this regard, we conducted a systematic review of the molecular characteristics, diagnostic advances, and treatment status of EGFR ex20ins. We summarized the latest data on relevant drug development and clinical research, aiming to provide reference for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and drug development.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of YK-029A in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: A Phase 1 Trial

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations are limited. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of YK-029A, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the preliminary efficacy of YK-029A in treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation.

METHODS

This multicenter, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion phase 1 clinical trial enrolled patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. During the dose-escalation phase, YK-029A was orally administered using the traditional 3+3 principle at 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg/d. In the dose-expansion phase, treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations were enrolled and administered YK-029A 200 mg/d. The primary end point was safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

The safety analysis included 108 patients. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (50.9%), diarrhea (49.1%), and rash (34.3%). There was minimal drug accumulation after multiple doses. A total of 28 treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations were enrolled in the dose-expansion and 26 were included in the efficacy analysis. According to the independent review committee evaluation, the objective response rate was 73.1% (95% confidence interval: 52.21%-88.43%), and the disease control rate was 92.3% (95% confidence interval: 74.87%-99.05%).

CONCLUSIONS

YK-029A was found to have manageable safety and be tolerable in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and have promising antitumor activity in untreated patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations.

Evaluating the Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Exon 20 Insertions

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins), an uncommon mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can induce poor patient response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the clinical features and prognosis of patients with EGFR ex20ins are not clearly understood. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients treated at Fujian Cancer Hospital were consecutively recruited from June 1, 2014 to December 20, 2021 and retrospectively examined. EGFR ex20ins was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and patient outcomes were retrieved from the hospital database. The progression-free survival (PFS)  and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen mutation subtypes of EGFR ex20ins were identified in the 24 enrolled patients, with EGFR ex20ins mutation more prevalent in non-smoking women. A763_Y764insFQEA and A767_V769dup (12.5% for both) were the most common mutation subtypes. Notably, no significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the first-line targeted therapy group [PFS: 257 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 116-397 days; OS: not reached] and chemotherapy-based combination therapy group (PFS: 182 days, 95% CI: 156-207 days; OS: 998 days, 95% CI: 674-1321 days). TP53 mutation was the commonest concomitant mutation (62%), followed by EGFR amplification (25%). Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with high PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

For NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, limited therapeutic benefits can be gleaned from either EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy-based combination therapy.

Targeting EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: Changes in Treatment Strategies are Coming

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations are the third most frequent EGFR mutation type, following only exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R point mutations. EGFR ex20ins mutations are found in approximately 4%-12% of all EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Unlike classical EGFR mutations, EGFR ex20ins mutations display remarkable subtype diversity and heterogeneity. Patients harboring these mutations generally have an inferior prognosis because of insensitivity to conventional treatment approaches such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Consequently, there remains a significant unmet medical need for efficacious treatments. Recently, amivantamab and sunvozertinib have demonstrated notable efficacy as first-line treatments, and several other promising novel targeted drugs are also challenging the status quo of traditional first-line platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. These developments are anticipated to further improve survival outcomes for NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations. Hence, this review summarizes the epidemiology, molecular attributes, detection methodologies, and therapeutic advancements for EGFR ex20ins mutations in NSCLC, and briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug resistance.

Amivantamab compared with real-world therapies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations after platinum-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In the single-arm CHRYSALIS trial, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (Exon 20ins) showed durable responses to amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody targeting tumors with EGFR Exon 20ins. This study compared the effectiveness of amivantamab to real-world systemic anti-cancer therapies in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

External control patients were selected by applying CHRYSALIS eligibility to Japanese patients from LC-SCRUM-Asia. External control patients were included for every qualifying line of therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. Propensity score weighting was applied to external control patients to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Outcomes were compared between external control patients, and all and Asian-only CHRYSALIS patients using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next therapy (TTNT), and overall survival (OS), and generalized estimating equations with repeated measurements for overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen CHRYSALIS and 94 external control patients were identified. Compared to external control patients, amivantamab-treated patients had significantly longer OS (median OS 19.88 vs 14.09 months, HR [95% CI] 0.59 [0.40-0.88]), PFS (median PFS 6.74 vs 4.73 months, HR 0.59 [0.45-0.78]), TTNT (median TTNT 12.16 vs 5.09 months, HR 0.39 [0.29-0.53]), and significantly higher ORR (41.7% vs 14.1%). Analyses of amivantamab-treated Asian patients (n = 61) showed similar clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of clinical evidence from randomized clinical trials, this study reflects the benefit of amivantamab after platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR Exon 20ins, compared to current real-world therapies.

Poor Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Exon 20 Insertion

BACKGROUND

EGFR and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion (Ex20ins) account for a small fraction of patients with EGFR mutations. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for these patients was still controversial.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled lung cancer patients harboring either EGFR or ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations. All the patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICIs, or platinum-based chemotherapy. The demographic features and clinical outcome of each patient were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

When treated with immunochemotherapy, patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations (n = 31) had poor PFS compared with those without EGFR mutations (n = 141, 5.0 mon and 11.2 mon, p < 0.001). When compared with those with EGFR classic mutations who received immunotherapy as the salvage therapy (n = 24), these patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations had similar PFS (5.0 mon and 4.1 mon, p = 0.625), ORR (37.5% vs. 48.4%), and DCR (70.8% vs. 77.4%). In the patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations, the PFS of those treated with chemotherapy (n = 54) and those treated with immunochemotherapy (n = 31) was 6.5 mon vs. 5.0 mon (p = 0.066). In the EGFR Ex20ins subgroup, the PFS of addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy (n = 20) and chemotherapy alone (n = 16) was 8.8 mon and 5.2 mon, respectively (p = 0.082) or immunochemotherapy (n = 15, 8.8 mon and 5.0 mon, p = 0.097). Similarly, in the ERBB2 subgroup, the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy achieved a numerically longer PFS over chemotherapy alone (9.1 mon and 4.5 mon, p = 0.253), but there was no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICIs had limited efficiency compared to platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins. Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab may be a potential scheme for these patients.

Real-World Response and Outcomes in Patients With NSCLC With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Introduction

This study describes treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins) in the United States.

Methods

The Flatiron Health electronic health record database was used to select three cohorts among patients diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins (January 1, 2011-February 29, 2020): (1) first-line (1L) or patients receiving 1L therapy after documented EGFRex20ins; (2) second or later-line (≥2L) or patients receiving ≥2L therapy after documented EGFRex20ins; and (3) ≥2L postplatinum trial-aligned, or ≥2L patients previously treated with platinum chemotherapy whose baseline characteristics aligned with key eligibility criteria (initiating new treatment after documented EGFRex20ins and ≥1 previous treatment excluding mobocertinib or amivantamab) of the mobocertinib trial NCT02716116. Real-world end points were confirmed overall response rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival.

Results

Of 237 patients with EGFRex20ins-mutated NSCLC, 129 and 114 patients were included in the 1L and ≥2L cohorts, respectively. In 1L patients, platinum chemotherapy plus nonplatinum chemotherapy (31.0%) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (28.7%) were the most common regimens. In ≥2L patients, immuno-oncology monotherapy (28.1%) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (17.5%) were the most common index treatments. For any 1L, ≥2L, and ≥2L postplatinum trial-aligned patients, the confirmed overall response rate was 18.6%, 9.6%, and 14.0%, respectively; the median overall survival was 17.0, 13.6, and 11.5 months; the median progression-free survival was 5.2, 3.7, and 3.3 months, respectively.

Conclusions

The outcomes for patients with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins were poor. This real-world study provides a benchmark on treatment outcomes in this patient population and highlights the unmet need for improved therapeutic options.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Since their first introduction in clinical practice, immune checkpoint inhibitors showed limited benefit in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. With the rationale of increasing immune activation, combinatorial ICI strategies have been evaluated also in this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on efficacy of ICI-based strategies in EGFR-mutant NSCLC according to most updated evidence.

RESULTS

Overall, ICI monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy confirm to be ineffective in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas the combination of ICI with antiangiogenic and chemotherapy showed promising results. Limited data are available with alternative ICI combination strategies, driven by strong biological rationale of modulating the tumor immune microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, the available evidence do not support the use of ICI in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Clinical trials are ongoing to define which is the best timing and exploring novel combinations with ICI in this specific disease.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions

PURPOSE

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) are associated with poor prognosis and resistance to traditional therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to elucidate the characteristics and treatment patterns to improve outcomes among this population in Taiwan.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins from 2011 to 2021 were reviewed. The treatment groups were classified as platinum-based chemotherapy (PtC), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and others. The response to therapy, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and factors associated with survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 71 patients, most were never-smoking males with stage IVB adenocarcinoma. The most common first-line (1L) regimen was PtC, followed by TKI. The most common second-line (2L) regimen was TKI. The median PFS of 1L treatment was 5.03 months, and the median OS was 18.43 months. Compared with that of TKI, 1L PtC use was associated with a higher ORR (26.3% vs. 9.1%) and DCR (60.5% vs. 18.2%) and a longer PFS (5.37 vs. 3.13 months, p = 0.044). PFS was also significantly longer in the 2L PtC group than in the 2L TKI group (4.73 vs. 2.25 months, p = 0.047). No patients receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimen exhibited a therapeutic response.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the heterogeneous clinical characteristics and treatment pattern of NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, underscoring the need for more effective therapies for this distinct molecular subtype.

A real-world study of the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

BACKGROUND

Furmonertinib is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A phase Ib study (FAVOUR, NCT04858958) initially demonstrated the efficacy of furmonertinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins). This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins having complete follow-up data, who were treated with furmonertinib from April 14, 2021, to March 15, 2022, at our institution and multiple hospitals in China. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

This study included 53 patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. A767_V769dup (28.3%) and S768_D770dup (11.3%) are the major variants. The ORR and DCR were 37.7% (20/53) and 92.5% (49/53), respectively. The 6-month PFS rate was 69.4% (95% CI 53.7-85.1%). The ORR of patients in the 240 mg once-daily dosage group was higher (42.9%) than that of patients in the 80 mg once-daily (25.0%) and 160 mg once-daily (39.5%) groups, but with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.816). The ORR of furmonertinib is not dependent on insertion location (P = 0.893). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline responded similarly to those without CNS metastases (ORR: 33.3% vs. 40.6%, P = 0.773). The most common AEs were diarrhea (26.4%) and rash (26.4%). No grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were observed. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of TRAEs between dosage groups (P = 0.271).

CONCLUSIONS

Furmonertinib has shown encouraging antitumor activity and CNS activity in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. Moreover, furmonertinib had a good safety profile and no dose-dependent toxicity.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes for Patients with EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertion-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

(1) Background: Exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) in EGFR and HER2 are uncommon driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a poor prognosis and few targeted therapy options, and there are limited real-world data. Here, we report the clinicopathologic features and outcomes for patients with ex20ins NSCLC across British Columbia, Canada. (2) Methods: NSCLC patients with ex20ins in EGFR or HER2 were identified via tumour testing between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2021 (n = 7233). Data were collected by chart review. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test. (3) Results: A total of 131 patients were identified. The median age was 66. Thirty-three percent of patients had brain metastases. For the EGFR cohort, the median OS was 18.6 months for patients who received any systemic therapy (ST) vs. 2.6 months for patients who did not (p < 0.001). Median OS was similar for patients treated with ex20ins-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) vs. other STs (18.6 vs. 15.9 months; p = 0.463). The median first-line PFS was 4.1 vs. 7.4 months for patients treated with a TKI vs. other ST (p = 0.744). For the HER2 cohort, the median OS was 9.0 months for patients who received any ST vs. 4.9 months for patients who did not (p = 0.015). The median OS was 23.0 months for patients treated with an ex20ins TKI vs. 5.6 months for patients who were not (p = 0.019). The median first-line PFS was 5.4 vs. 2.1 months for patients treated with a TKI vs. other ST (p = 0.343). (4) Conclusions: Overall survival was significantly longer among ex20ins patients who received any systemic therapy vs. those who did not. Overall survival was significantly better among HER2 ex20ins patients who received ex20ins-specific TKIs.

An Adjusted Treatment Comparison Comparing Amivantamab Versus Real-World Clinical Practice in Europe and the United States for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) have poor prognoses, exacerbated by a previous lack of specific treatment guidelines and unmet need for targeted therapies. Amivantamab, an EGFR and MET bispecific antibody, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with Exon20ins following platinum-based therapy in CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776; Cohort D+). Since CHRYSALIS was single-arm, individual patient data (IPD)-based adjusted analyses versus similar patients in real-world clinical practice (RWCP) were conducted to generate comparative evidence.

METHODS

RWCP cohorts were derived from seven European and US real-world sources, comprising patients fulfilling CHRYSALIS Cohort D+ eligibility criteria. Amivantamab was compared with a basket of RWCP treatments. Differences in prognostic characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability weighting (IPW; average treatment effect among the treated [ATT]). Balance between cohorts was assessed using standardized mean differences (SMDs). Overall response rate (ORR; investigator- [INV] and independent review committee-assessed [IRC]), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS; INV and IRC) and time-to-next treatment (TTNT) were compared. Binary and time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using weighted logistic regression and proportional hazards regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Pre-adjustment, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. IPW ATT-adjustment improved comparability, giving closely matched characteristics. ORR (INV) was 36.8% for amivantamab versus 17.0% for the adjusted EU + US cohort (response rate ratio [RR]: 2.16). Median OS, PFS (INV) and TTNT were 22.77 versus 12.52 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47; p < 0.0001), 6.93 versus 4.17 months (HR: 0.55; p < 0.0001) and 12.42 versus 5.36 months (HR: 0.44; p < 0.0001) for amivantamab versus the adjusted EU + US cohort, respectively. Results were consistent versus EU- and US-only cohorts, and when using IRC assessment.

CONCLUSION

Adjusted comparisons demonstrated significantly improved outcomes for amivantamab versus RWCP, highlighting the value of amivantamab in addressing unmet need in patients with advanced EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC following platinum-based therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CHRYSALIS: NCT02609776.

FDA Approval Summary: Mobocertinib for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

On September 15, 2021, the FDA granted accelerated approval to mobocertinib (Exkivity, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.) for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test, whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. The approval was based on data from Study AP32788-15-101 (NCT02716116), an international, non-randomized, multi-cohort clinical trial that included patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations. The overall response rate in 114 patients whose disease had progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy was 28% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20%-37%] with a median duration of response of 17.5 months (95% CI, 7.4-20.3). The most common adverse reactions (>20%) were diarrhea, rash, nausea, stomatitis, vomiting, decreased appetite, paronychia, fatigue, dry skin, and musculoskeletal pain. Product labeling includes a Boxed Warning for QTc prolongation and torsades de pointes. This is the first approval of an oral targeted therapy for patients with advanced EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive NSCLC.

Advances in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is one of the key oncogenic mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer with adenocarcinoma histology. Exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R substitutions account for 90%, while EGFR exon 20 insertions constitute 4-10% of EGFR mutations and are the third most prevalent activating EGFR mutations. EGFR exon 20 insertions are associated with decreased sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and, until recently, effective targeted therapy against these tumours remained an unmet clinical need and chemotherapy was the only treatment of choice available. The approval of amivantamab and mobocertinib for patients who have progressed after chemotherapy represents an important step forward in the management of these patients. Here in this review, we summarize the epidemiology, structure and the tumour microenvironment of EGFR exon 20 insertion and also review the systemic treatments, including targeted therapies and ongoing clinical trials in EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, as well as detection methods for EGFR exon 20 insertion. Lastly, resistant mechanisms and future directions are addressed.

Targeting exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The application of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has successfully changed the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) positive non-small cell lung cancer. However, clinical survivals for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions have failed to improve over the long period and the mutation appeared resistant to EGFR -TKIs. This overview focused on the current treatment strategies, summarized the emerging regimens for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions, and demonstrated historical challenges and future development.

RECENT FINDING

Current clinical trials suggested that several regimens selectively-targeted EGFR exon 20 insertions presented potent antitumor activity, like mobocertinib and the bispecific anti- EGFR-MET monoclonal antibody amivantamab and were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in patients progressed beyond first-line treatment. Novel treatments, including DZD9008, CLN-081, revealed modest clinical efficacy as well and clinical trials are underway, which may lead to improvement of survival outcomes.

SUMMARY

Recent clinical evidence indicates that targeted therapies could improve survival benefits to some extent. More efforts on drug development are underway to bring higher response rates both extracranial and intracranial, sustained clinical remission, and better survival benefits.

First-line immunotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertions: Real-world evidence from China

BACKGROUND

Currently, survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) is controversial, though it generally indicates poor response and activity. Compared with standard chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab, first-line chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins remains elusive and lacks real-world evidence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective real-world study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes of chemotherapy alone (C), chemotherapy plus ICI (C + I), or chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors (C + A) as first-line strategies for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins. Investigator-assessed response and survival outcomes were compared between subgroups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was conducted to reveal concomitant alterations and explore the molecular landscape of ex20ins.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were screened, identifying 35 kinds of ex20ins, and 122 cases treated with C, C + I, and C + A were finally included in the first-line analysis. C + A achieved much better objective response rate (ORR, 38.1% vs. 18.2%) and significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with C (median, 7.73 vs.5.93 months, HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.90, p = 0.014), and it showed similar ORR (38.1% vs. 40.0%), but higher disease control rate (DCR, 96.8% vs. 80.0%) and numerically longer median PFS (7.73 vs. 6.53 months, HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.44-1.56, p = 0.30) than C + I. There was no PFS difference between C + I and C, despite of PD-L1 expression or tumor mutational burden. KEGG analysis revealed concomitant upregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic resistance to ICI in ex20ins.

CONCLUSION

First-line chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors might yield more survival benefits than chemotherapy alone for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins, whereas, it suggests that chemotherapy in combination with ICI might not obtain a better survival benefit for this subset of patients. Activation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic immunosuppression in NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins.

Non-small cell lung carcinomas with diffuse coexpression of TTF1 and p40: clinicopathological and genomic features of 14 rare biphenotypic tumours

Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) and p40 are widely-utilized diagnostic markers of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), respectively. Diffuse coexpression of TTF1 and p40 has been described in only rare case reports. In a multi-institutional study, we collected the largest cohort of these unusual tumours to-date (n = 14), with the goal of elucidating their clinicopathological and genomic characteristics. Lung tumours with diffuse coexpression (labelling 50-100% tumour cells) of TTF1 clone 8G7G3/1 and p40 clone BC28 were identified. Detailed clinicopathological and immunohistochemical parameters were analyzed. Eight tumours were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the results were compared to those in > 9 K LUAD and > 1 K LUSC. All tumours with diffuse TTF1/p40 coexpression were poorly differentiated non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC), 42% of which had basaloid features. Some tumours exhibited focal keratinization (14%), napsin A and/or mucicarmine labelling (46%) or both squamous and glandular features (7%). NGS revealed a uniquely high rate of FGFR1 amplifications (70%) compared to either LUAD (0.7%, P < 0.0001) or LUSC (11%, P = 0.001). LUAD-type targetable driver alterations were identified in 38% of cases (one EGFR, two KRAS G12C). The tumours were clinically aggressive, exhibiting metastatic disease in most patients. Lung carcinomas with diffuse TTF1/p40 coexpression represent poorly differentiated NSCLCs with frequent basaloid features, but some show evidence of focal squamous, glandular or dual differentiation with a distinctly high rate of FGFR1 amplifications. The presence of targetable LUAD-type alterations (EGFR, KRAS G12C) emphasizes the importance of molecular testing in these tumours.

Review of novel and supplemental approvals of the targeted cancer drugs by the Food and Drug Administration in 2021

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to present the most recent results from clinical trials of targeted cancer drugs that led to the Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021 and reflect the changing treatment landscape of solid malignancies.

DATA SOURCES

Novel approvals and supplemental approvals in 2021 were retrieved from the official web page of the Food and Drug Administration (Drugs@FDA). This review did not include approvals for generics, biosimilars, imaging, and diagnostics agents.

DATA SUMMARY

This review included 10 novel drugs approved for 11 indications and 10 already-approved drugs approved for 21 indications by the Food and Drug Administration in 2021. Novel approvals mainly were related to treating an orphan disease. In addition, one-third of the supplemental approvals were given for neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, while the number of indications for each tumor site was as follows: gastrointestinal (7), genitourinary (5), skin (3), lung (2), breast (2), thyroid (1), and cervix (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted cancer treatments are gaining more importance than ever in treating malignant diseases. As the approval of targeted cancer drugs provides a possibility for patients and this trend is expected to continue in the future, it remains vital for healthcare providers to stay up-to-date with newer therapeutic options.

Comparative Clinical Outcomes Between EGFR Ex20ins and Wildtype NSCLC Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) has not been closely examined due to the frequent exclusion of patients with EGFR mutations from large immunotherapy-based NSCLC trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A real-world, retrospective study was conducted to compare outcomes of ICI-treated patients with EGFR ex20ins and wildtype NSCLC (wt-NSCLC; defined as EGFR and ALK test negative). Patients with advanced NSCLC from the Flatiron Health database (2015-2020) were included in the analysis. Real-world time to next therapy (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS), stratified by ICI initiation line of therapy, were the prespecified primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 59 patients with EGFR ex20ins NSCLC and 5365 with wt-NSCLC, ICI treatment was received as first-line therapy in 25% and 39%, respectively. Patients with EGFR ex20ins had a 58% increased risk of shorter time to next-line therapy compared with wt-NSCLC (adjusted hazard ratio of 1.58 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.1]; P = .0012). The median rwTTNT for first ICI line was 3.7 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.9) for EGFR ex20ins NSCLC compared with 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.6-6.0) for wt-NSCLC. No meaningful difference in rwOS between the groups was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI therapy may be less effective for patients with EGFR ex20ins compared with wt-NSCLC. Consistent with prior data on exon 19 deletion and L858R substitution, tumors harboring ex20ins appear to be less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition than wt-NSCLC.

Biomarker-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignancies and the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite many therapeutic advances in the past decade, NSCLC remains an incurable disease for the majority of patients. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies have significantly improved the prognosis of NSCLC. However, the vast majority of advanced NSCLC develop resistance to current therapies and eventually progress. In this review, we discuss current and potential therapies for NSCLC, focusing on targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We highlight the future role of metabolic therapies and combination therapies in NSCLC.

Real-world clinical treatment outcomes in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Background

EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFR ex20ins) constitute a heterogeneous subset of EGFR-activating alterations. However, the effectiveness of standard therapy in patients with EGFR ex20ins remains poor.

Methods

In our study, we retrospectively collected next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from 7,831 Chinese NSCLC patients and analyzed the relationship between EGFR ex20ins variations and medical records.

Results

Our data showed that EGFR ex20ins account for up to 3.5% of all EGFR mutation non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 1.6% of all NSCLC patients in China. Thirty-eight different variants of EGFR ex20ins were identified in 129 NSCLC patients. We observed that the patients with EGFR ex20ins may benefit from the anti-angiogenesis agents significantly (P = 0.027). In the EGFR ex20ins near-loop group, patients who received second-/third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy treatment as first-line treatment had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than those who initiated treatment with first-generation EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy. Patients with co-mutations of EGFR ex20ins near-loop and TP53 tended to have a shorter OS in second-/third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy (P = 0.039). Additionally, median PFS was significantly longer in patients harboring EGFR ex20ins far-loop variants who received chemotherapy as a first-line setting (P = 0.037).

Conclusions

Overall survival was significantly longer in EGFR ex20ins patients with anti-angiogenesis agents. For the choice of first-line strategy, NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins near-loop variants may benefit from second-/third-generation EGFR-TKI, while patients harboring EGFR ex20ins far-loop variants might have better outcomes from chemotherapy. TP53 could serve as a potential predictive marker in poor prognosis for EGFR ex20ins near-loop patients.

Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Signatures of m6ARNA Methylation Regulators in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Development of a Risk Scoring System

The recent application of targeted immunotherapy has greatly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), but drug resistance continues to emerge, and to evaluate and to improve patient prognosis are arduous. The diagnostic and prognostic value of N6-methyladenosine (M6A) in LUAD has attracted increasing attention. We systematically studied correlations among important M6A methylation regulators, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and immune infiltration in clinical and sequencing data from the LUAD cohort of the cancer genome map (TCGA). The molecular subtype clusters 1 and 2 were identified by the consensus clustering of 16 M6A regulatory factors. Clinical prognosis, M6A regulatory factor expression, TMB, pathway enrichment, and immune cell infiltration significantly differed between clusters 1 and 2. Compared with other clinical traits, a prognostic risk score system constructed using the M6A regulatory factors HNRNPA2B1 and HNRNPC can serve as an independent prognostic method for LUAD, with higher predictive sensitivity and specificity. Risk scores were significantly higher for cluster 2 than 1, which was consistent with the trend towards a better prognosis in cluster 1. Overall, our findings revealed an important role of M6A methylation regulators in LUAD, and our risk scoring system involving these regulators might help to screen groups at high risk for LUAD and provide important theoretical bioinformatic support for evaluating the prognosis of such patients.

Non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes

INTRODUCTION

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rare, has a poor prognosis, and outcomes are not fully established. We describe and evaluate outcomes from real-world and clinical evidence in these patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) identified interventional and real-world evidence (RWE) studies reporting clinical outcomes for EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive NSCLC. Meta-analyses were conducted by line of therapy to synthesize pooled survival and response outcomes across RWE. Published evidence from interventional studies was summarized individually.

RESULTS

The SLR identified 23 RWE and 19 original interventional studies. In the meta-analysis of RWE, pooled response and survival outcomes were low for first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immuno-oncology (IO) agents. First-line chemotherapy resulted in a pooled ORR 25.7%, pooled PFS 5.6 months, and pooled OS 18.3 months. Pooled outcomes were further reduced in second or later lines (≥2 L): pooled ORR was 5.0%, 3.3%, and 13.9%; pooled PFS was 2.1 months, 2.3 months, and 4.4 months; and pooled OS was 14.1 months, 8.8 months, and 17.1 months (not a pooled result) for EGFR-TKIs, IO agents, and chemotherapy, respectively. Interventional studies reported outcomes for TKIs (mobocertinib, poziotinib, osimertinib, afatinib, CLN-081, DZD9008), a monoclonal antibody (amivantamab), and a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor (luminespib). While there is limited RWE for the recently approved agents mobocertinib and amivantamab, which specifically target exon 20 insertion mutations, interventional evidence supports their potential as effective treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional treatments used in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive NSCLC have limited efficacy, though chemotherapy appeared to be associated with better response and survival outcomes than non-exon 20 targeting EGFR-TKIs and IO agents. This supports the need to identify EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations as the availability of new targeted treatments may offer additional therapeutic options to these patients.

Optimizing diagnosis and treatment of EGFR exon 20 insertions mutant NSCLC

The Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon (ex) 20 insertions (ins) has been considered as an "undruggable target" for a long time, with platinum-pemetrexed combination recommended as upfront standard treatment for newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Recent preliminary data from early phase clinical trials have demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of EGFRex20ins is possible, offering new treatment opportunities to 1-2% of advanced NSCLC patients harboring such hard-to-treat molecular alteration. Among the different drugs under clinical investigation, both amivantamab and mobocertinib have received regulatory approval in the United States, by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), while amivantamab has been recently approved also in Europe, for the clinical treatment of advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFRex20ins who failed at least one prior line of systemic therapy, representing a major breakthrough in lung cancer treatment over the last year. With novel effective targeted options on the horizon, there is a renewed interest on optimizing the molecular screening of advanced NSCLC, and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genotyping is currently considered the gold standard approach to profile advanced NSCLC patients, as recommended by international guidelines. Herein we provide an updated overview of the most recent findings and upcoming challenges regarding both molecular detection and therapeutic management of EGFR ex20ins mutant advanced NSCLC patients.

Uncommon EGFR mutations in lung carcinoma: features and treatment outcomes in a retrospective French cohort

Background

The best management for rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains uncertain. The literature indicates that response to usual treatment could differ in certain subgroups such as exon 20 insertion/duplication (E20ID), other single uncommon mutation (OSUM), and EGFR complex mutation (ECM).

Methods

In this observational, regional, multi-center, retrospective study, we gathered data on uncommon EGFR mutations in NSCLC from 2007 to 2021. We analyzed patient characteristics, prognostic factors and treatment outcomes [objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)].

Results

Among 119 patients with an uncommon EGFR mutant, 34 harbored E20ID, 23 ECM, and 62 OSUM. There were significantly more non-smokers in E20ID. Female gender and performance status <2 were associated with a better prognosis. Among the 97 metastatic patients with available data for 1st line treatment, median estimated OS was 21 months (95% CI: 18-31 months), with better non-significant OS for ECM. Median estimated PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 4-9 months). We found significant differences in ORR, DCR and PFS favoring 1st line chemotherapy for E20ID, whereas the outcomes for OSUM and ECM were more favorable for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (mainly 2nd and 3rd generation).

Conclusions

There were variations in treatment outcomes among subgroups in our cohort. Exon 20 insertions showed better ORR and PFS with 1st line chemotherapy compared to TKI. Conversely, other rare EGFR mutations including ECM had better ORR and PFS with TKI than chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in OS among treatment groups overall or within rare mutation subgroups.

Various Subtypes of EGFR Mutations in Patients With NSCLC Define Genetic, Immunologic Diversity and Possess Different Prognostic Biomarkers

Based on data analysis of 9649 Chinese primary NSCLC patients, we calculated the exact proportion of EGFR subtypes in NSCLC and evaluated the TMB level, PD-L1 expression level and tumor immune microenvironment among different EGFR mutation subtypes. Postoperative follow-up data for 98 patients were collected and analyzed. The results showed that several uncommon EGFR mutation subtypes have a higher proportion of TMB-high or strong positive PD-L1 expression than the total EGFR mutation group. In addition, different subtypes have different characteristics related to the immune microenvironment, such as G719 mutations being associated with more CD8⁺ T cell infiltration into tumors; except for EGFR 19del, CD8⁺ T cell infiltration into tumors of other EGFR mutation subtypes were similar to that of wildtype EGFR. Moreover, follow-up results revealed that components of the immune microenvironment have prognostic value for NSCLC patients, with different prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC patients with and without EGFR mutations. These results suggest that patients with different EGFR mutations need to be treated differently. The prognosis of NSCLC patients may be assessed through components of tumor immune microenvironment, and ICIs treatment may be considered for those with some uncommon EGFR mutation subtypes.

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: current status and perspectives

Platinum-based chemotherapy was previously the first-choice treatment for lung cancer. The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations and the development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) marked the beginning of the targeted therapy era for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty percent of NSCLC patients carry EGFR gene mutations. For these advanced NSCLC patients, EGFR-TKIs are currently preferred for their superior activity and survival benefits over platinum-based chemotherapy. However, therapeutic efficacy is quite different in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations versus common mutations. Patients with ex20ins mutations are insensitive to EGFR-TKIs and have poor prognosis. Some drugs targeting EGFR ex20ins mutations have been approved. Here, we systematically reviewed the recent clinical research of and treatments used for EGFR ex20ins mutations, summarized the latest data on emerging therapies, and discussed future prospects and treatments.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A review of phase II and III trials

INTRODUCTION

EGFR is one of the most common driver gene mutations in lung cancer. EGFR-TKI monotherapy and EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenesis drugs have significantly prolonged the survival of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, disease progression caused by acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs is inevitable. And patients with EGFR exon 20ins showed limited efficacy to EGFR-TKIs.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we initially evaluated the efficacy of existing treatments for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Second, we reviewed the ongoing phase II and III clinical trials, provide the latest results, discuss the scientific rationale of these trials and the potential development issues.

EXPERT OPINION

The application of EGFR-TKIs has greatly changed the therapeutic strategies for advanced and resected NSCLC with EGFR mutations, and the 5-year OS rate for advanced NSCLC was close to 40%. The current research direction for the treatment of patients with EGFR mutations focuses on the following three aspects: uncommon EGFR mutation subtypes NSCLC, brain metastases, and EGFR TKI-based combination therapy. Future studies on EGFR-mutant NSCLC therapy will focus on overcoming EGFR-TKI-related resistance, preventing drug resistance in advance, and developing bispecific antibody drugs. ADCs may be the promising strategy for patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Immunotherapy-based combination strategies for treatment of EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC

The rapid development of molecular targeted therapy brings hope to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, drug resistance inevitably occurs during treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, shows a favorable prognosis in T790M-positive NSCLC. Unfortunately, acquired resistance is still a challenge for both patients and clinicians. There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment. PD-1 and its ligand receptor 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have yielded great progress, especially in patients with no actionable mutations. In this review, the authors take stock of the relationship between EGFR mutations and PD-L1 expression and summarize the important clinical studies on immunotherapy-inhibitor-based treatment in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC.

Comprehensive Comparative Molecular Characterization of Young and Old Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Young lung cancer as a small subgroup of lung cancer has not been fully studied. Most of the previous studies focused on the clinicopathological features, but studies of molecular characteristics are still few and limited. Here, we explore the characteristics of prognosis and variation in young lung cancer patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

A total of 5639 young lung cancer samples (NSCLC, age ≤40) were screened from the SEER and the same number of the old (NSCLC, age ≥60) were screened by propensity score matching to evaluate the prognosis of two groups. 165 treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with NSCLC were enrolled to explore the molecular feature difference between two age-varying groups. CCLE cell line expression data was used to verify the finding from the cohort of 165 patients.

RESULTS

The overall survival of the young lung cancer group was significantly better than the old. Germline analysis showed a trend that the young group contained a higher incidence of germline alterations. The TMB of the young group was lower. Meanwhile, the heterogeneity and evolutionary degrees of the young lung cancer group were also lower than the old. The mutation spectrums of two groups exhibited variance with LRP1B, SMARCA4, STK11, FAT2, RBM10, FANCM mutations, EGFR L858R more recurrent in the old group and EML4-ALK fusions, BCL2L11 deletion polymorphism, EGFR 19DEL, 20IN more recurrent in the young group. For the base substitution, the young showed a lower fraction of transversion. Further, we performed a pathway analysis and found the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance pathway enriched in the young lung cancer group, which was validated in gene expression data later.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significantly different molecular features of the young lung cancer group. The young lung cancer group had a more simple alteration structure. Alteration spectrums and base substitution types varied between two groups, implying the different pathogenesis. The young lung cancer group had more potential treatment choices. Although young lung patients had better outcomes, there were still adverse factors of them, suggesting that the young group still needs more caution for treatment choice and monitoring after the treatment to further improve the prognosis.

Case Report: Partial Response Following Nivolumab Plus Docetaxel in a Patient With EGFR Exon 20 Deletion/Insertion (p.N771delinsGF) Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Transdifferentiated From Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The histological transformation from lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and p. N771delinsGF mutations in EGFR exon 20 (ex20) are exceedingly rare in non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). EGFR ex20 mutations are insensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC. Here, we present a 76-year-old male smoker harboring LUAD with a novel p. N771delinsGF deletion/insertion mutation in EGFR ex20 transdifferentiating from advanced LUSC after chemoradiotherapy. The patient presented reduced hydrothorax and relieved tightness with the treatment of nivolumab plus docetaxel and carboplatin after the failure of second-line chemotherapy. The case highlights the importance of rebiopsy and molecular retesting after the progression of lung cancer and supports the idea that the combination of immune checkpoint blockade and chemotherapy may be an attractive option for patients with EGFR ex20 mutations associated with LUSC–LUAD transformation.

EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions in solid tumours: from biology to treatment

Protein tyrosine kinases of the human epidermal growth factor receptor family, including EGFR and HER2, have emerged as important therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung, breast and gastroesophageal cancers, and are of relevance for the treatment of various other malignancies (particularly colorectal cancer). Classic activating EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 mutations, and HER2 amplification and/or overexpression, are predictive of response to matched molecularly targeted therapies, translating into favourable objective response rates and survival outcomes. By comparison, cancers with insertion mutations in exon 20 of either EGFR or HER2 are considerably less sensitive to the currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies targeting these receptors. These exon 20 insertions are structurally distinct from other EGFR and HER2 mutations, providing an explanation for this lack of sensitivity. In this Review, we first discuss the prevalence and pan-cancer distribution of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions, their biology and detection, and associated responses to current molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We then focus on novel approaches that are being developed to more effectively target tumours driven by these non-classic EGFR and HER2 alterations.

Molecular charcterization of lung adenocarcinoma combining whole exome sequencing, copy number analysis and gene expression profiling

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide; lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) corresponds to about 40% of lung cancers. LUAD is a genetically heterogeneous disease and the definition of this heterogeneity is of fundamental importance for prognosis and treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Based on primary literature, this review provides an updated analysis of multiomics studies based on the study of mutation profiling, copy number alterations and gene expression allowing for definition of molecular subgroups, prognostic factors based on molecular biomarkers, and identification of therapeutic targets. The authors sum up by providing the reader with their expert opinion on the potentialities of multiomics analysis of LUADs.

EXPERT OPINION

A detailed and comprehensive study of the co-occurring genetic abnormalities characterizing different LUAD subsets represents a fundamental tool for a better understanding of the disease heterogeneity and for the identification of subgroups of patients responding or resistant to targeted treatments and for the discovery of new therapeutic targets. It is expected that a comprehensive characterization of LUADs may provide a fundamental contribution to improve the survival of LUAD patients.

Discovery, Development, Inventions, and Patent Trends on Mobocertinib Succinate: The First-in-Class Oral Treatment for NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions

The majority of lung cancers are non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) having a low survival rate. Recent studies have indicated the involvement of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) oncogene mutations like EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins) mutation among NSCLC patients. The response of patients of NSCLC with the EGFRex20ins mutation to the currently available EGFR inhibitor is negligible. Mobocertinib is the first oral treatment that has been approved by the USFDA, on 15 September 2021, to treat NSCLC with the EGFRex20ins mutation. This patent review discusses the inventions and patent literature of mobocertinib that will help the scientific community to develop additional and improved inventions related to mobocertinib. The structure of mobocertinib was first reported in 2015. Therefore, this article covered the patents/patent applications related to mobocertinib from 2015 to 25 October 2021. The patent search revealed 27 patents/patent applications related to compound, method of treatment, salt, polymorph, process, composition, and drug combinations of mobocertinib. The authors foresee an exciting prospect for developing a treatment for NSCLC with EGFRex20ins mutation, and other cancers employing a combination of mobocertinib with other approved anticancer agents. The inventions related to novel dosage forms, processes, and intermediates used in the synthesis of mobocertinib are also anticipated.

Comparative clinical outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and common EGFR mutations

INTRODUCTION

Real-world clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion (exon20ins) mutations have not been extensively studied. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes of EGFR exon20ins compared with common EGFR (cEGFR) mutations.

METHODS

Adults with advanced NSCLC harboring any EGFR mutations in the NSCLC Flatiron registry (2011 through May 2020) were included. To compare the relative prognosis (prognostic value) of exon20ins vs cEGFR, real-world overall survival (rwOS) was the primary endpoint. Separately, to compare the relative response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment (predictive value), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

For the prognostic value analysis, 3014 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC (cEGFR, n = 2833; EGFR exon20ins, n = 181) were eligible. The median (95% CI) rwOS was 16.2 (11.04-19.38) months in the EGFR exon20ins cohort vs 25.5 (24.48-27.04) months in the cEGFR cohort (adjusted HR, 1.75 [1.45-2.13]; p < 0.0001); 5-year rwOS was 8% and 19%, respectively. For the predictive value analysis, 2825 patients received TKI treatment and were eligible (cEGFR, n = 2749; EGFR exon20ins, n = 76). The median (95% CI) rwPFS from start of the first TKI was 2.9 (2.14-3.91) months in the EGFR exon20ins cohort vs 10.5 (10.05-10.94) months in the cEGFR cohort (adjusted HR, 2.69 [2.05-3.54]; p < 0001). Among patients with EGFR exon20ins, the most common prescribed first-line therapy was platinum-based chemotherapy (61.3%) followed by EGFR TKIs (21.5%); second-line treatments were varied, with no clear standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EGFR exon20ins have poor prognosis and receive little benefit from EGFR TKI treatment. More effective therapies are needed in this difficult-to-treat population.

Front-Line ICI-Based Combination Therapy Post-TKI Resistance May Improve Survival in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutation

BACKGROUND

Data on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation are limited. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of ICIs in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and explore the relevant influential factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant clinical data of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who had received ICIs were collected from multiple hospitals. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and relevant influential factors.

RESULTS

A total of 122 advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were included in the final analysis. The total cohort had an objective response rate (ORR) of 32.0%, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.0 months, and a median overall survival (mOS) of 14.4 months. Among 96 patients with common EGFR mutations (19Del, 52 patients; L858R, 44 patients), those who were administered front-line ICI exhibited better survival benefits than those who received later-line ICI after disease progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment (mPFS: 7.2 months vs. 3.4 months, respectively, P < 0.0001; mOS: 15.1 months vs. 8.4 months, respectively, P <0.0001). Moreover, the efficacy of ICI-based combination therapy was better than that of ICI monotherapy (mPFS: 5.0 months vs. 2.2 months, respectively, P = 0.002; mOS: 14.4 months vs. 7.0 months, respectively, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that ICI-based combination therapy and front-line ICI administration after progression on EGFR-TKI were associated with significant improvements in both PFS and OS (P < 0.05). A high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score, TPS≥50%) and the EGFR L858R mutation were only significantly associated with a better PFS (P <0.05). A better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status was independently associated with a favorable OS (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, combination immunotherapy in front-line was associated with improvement of survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients post-TKI resistance. Further prospective studies with large sample sizes are required to identify the optimal combinatorial treatment strategy.

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion variants in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions occur rarely among different cancer types, with the highest frequency reported among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, particularly adenocarcinomas (ADCs). Exon 20 insertions fall back in the tyrosine kinase domain, and can be clustered into two principal groups represented by in frame insertions and three to 21 bp (corresponding to 1-7 amino acids) duplications within amino acids 762 and 774. The identification of these alterations is key for an adequate management of NSCLC patients due to the possibility to treat these patients with specific targeted therapies. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, able to detect several hotspot gene mutations for different patients simultaneously, is the best detection approach due to its higher sensitivity and specificity compared to other techniques. Here we reviewed the principal biological characteristics, the main detection technologies and treatment options for NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertions.

A Real-World Study of Patients with Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

In Europe, few data regarding the characteristics of EGFR exon 20 insertion (20ins) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are available.

OBJECTIVE

Using a large real-world cohort, we assessed the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with non-squamous (nsq) NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20ins.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics advanced and metastatic lung cancer data platform including advanced/metastatic nsqNSCLC patients from January 2015 was analyzed (cut-off date: June 30, 2020). Characteristics, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and other mutations, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were assessed for patients harboring EGFR exon 20ins, common EGFR mutations, other EGFR mutations, and wild-type EGFR. Survival parameters were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method in these four groups.

RESULTS

Out of 9435 nsqNSCLC patients tested for EGFR, 1549 (16.4%) had a mutation, including 61 with EGFR exon 20ins (3.9% of all mutated EGFR). These 61 patients had a mean age of 63.6 years, were mostly female (68.9%) and non-smokers (55.7%), with de novo stage IV disease (73.8%) and performance status 0-1 (76.9%). Almost all patients (95.1%) with exon 20ins received systemic therapy (median, three lines). First-line systemic treatments consisted mainly of combination chemotherapy (70.7%), single-agent EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (10.3%), and single-agent immunotherapy (5.2%). After a median follow-up of 25.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.3-32.4) months, the median real-world overall survival was 24.3 (19.1-32.6) months in patients with exon 20ins compared to 35.4 (95% CI 32.6-37.5) in patients with common EGFR mutation (n = 1049) (p = 0.049) and 19.6 (95% CI 18.6-20.5) in patients with wild-type EGFR (n = 7866) (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

This large national study in nsqNSCLC patients confirms that EGFR exon 20ins is a rare condition (0.6%). The prognosis associated with exon 20ins appears to be in line with that of wild-type EGFR, but worse than common EGFR mutations, highlighting the need for advancements for this rare population.

Clinical characteristics of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) account for 4–12% of all EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Data on the differences in clinical characteristics between patients with Exon20ins and major mutations (M-mut) such as exon 19 deletion and L858R are limited. We retrospectively reviewed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, who were treated with systemic therapy between January 2011 and December 2019. We identified 23 patients with Exon20ins and 534 patients with M-mut. In Exon20ins patients, the median age was 60 (range 27–88) years, and females and never-smokers were predominant. Clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. In Exon20ins patients, 17 patients received platinum doublet as first-line therapy, and the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 11.8% and 8.9 months. Additionally, seven patients received conventional EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and eight patients anti-PD-1 antibodies in any-line therapy. ORR and mPFS of EGFR-TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies were 0%, 2.2 months and 25%, 3.1 months, respectively. Overall survival was significantly shorter in Exon20ins patients than in M-mut patients (29.3 vs. 43.4 months, p = 0.04). The clinical outcomes in Exon20ins patients were not satisfactory compared to M-mut patients.

Targeting EGFR Exon 20 Insertions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Recent Advances and Clinical Updates

Approximately 10% of EGFR-activating mutations occur as in-frame insertion mutations in exon 20 of the EGFR kinase domain (EGFR ins20). EGFR ins20 mutations have not demonstrated the same sensitivity to early generations of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as canonical activating EGFR mutations such as del19 and L858R. Development of effective therapies for this subset of patients has been challenging, but recent years have seen more rapid progress in these efforts. In this review, we describe the molecular and clinicopathologic features of EGFR ins20 mutations and summarize recent data on emerging therapies for patients with this subtype of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SIGNIFICANCE: When activating mutations in EGFR were first discovered in lung cancer, the lack of sensitivity of tumors harboring EGFR ins20 mutations to early-generation EGFR TKIs resulted in this subset of EGFR-mutant tumors being initially classified as an untargetable or intrinsically resistant subpopulation. In addition, the diversity of mutations within EGFR exon 20 and resultant challenges identifying them on routine clinical genotyping tests led to underestimation of their frequency. However, recent scientific progress in targeting EGFR ins20 mutations as well as more effective identification of this clinical cohort has enhanced our ability to develop effective therapies for patients with this subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

The evolving paradigm of precision medicine in lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we report a complete and updated summary of the most recent treatment advances in the fields of oncogene-addicted disease and provide expert perspectives on the evolving paradigm of precision medicine in lung cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of innovative genome sequencing technologies is rapidly increasing the number of targetable molecular alterations in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), leading to the introduction of novel selective inhibitors into the clinical arena, showing unprecedent tumor responses against rare and elusive NSCLC targets. The results of the ADAURA trial suggested that targeting EGFR pathway in the adjuvant setting is a feasible and effective strategy. The routine use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently recommended as new standard approach to profile advanced NSCLC samples while recent findings suggest the potential application of a plasma-based first approach for tumor genotyping. Innovative umbrella trials provide the right infrastructure to investigate the role of precision medicine in advanced NSCLC, but failed to show clinical benefit.

SUMMARY

Implementing NGS-based molecular screening, increasing patients' access to biomarker driven-clinical trials, ensuring equal access to molecular testing and innovative treatments, overcoming disparities and preserve health systems' financial sustainability represents the main challenges of precision medicine worldwide.