Selinexor in Combination with R-CHOP for Frontline Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Results of a Phase I Study

A first-in-class inhibitor of HSP110 to potentiate XPO1-targeted therapy in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and classical Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are distinct hematological malignancies of B-cell origin that share many biological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. In particular, the JAK/STAT signaling pathway is a driver of tumor development due to multiple recurrent mutations, particularly in STAT6. Furthermore, the XPO1 gene that encodes exportin 1 (XPO1) shows a frequent point mutation (E571K) resulting in an altered export of hundreds of cargo proteins, which may impact the success of future therapies in PMBL and cHL. Therefore, targeted therapies have been envisioned for these signaling pathways and mutations.

METHODS

To identify novel molecular targets that could overcome the treatment resistance that occurs in PMBL and cHL patients, we have explored the efficacy of a first-in-class HSP110 inhibitor (iHSP110-33) alone and in combination with selinexor, a XPO1 specific inhibitor, both in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

We show that iHSP110-33 decreased the survival of several PMBL and cHL cell lines and the size of tumor xenografts. We demonstrate that HSP110 is a cargo of XPO1wt as well as of XPO1E571K. Using immunoprecipitation, proximity ligation, thermophoresis and kinase assays, we showed that HSP110 directly interacts with STAT6 and favors its phosphorylation. The combination of iHSP110-33 and selinexor induces a synergistic reduction of STAT6 phosphorylation and of lymphoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo. In biopsies from PMBL patients, we show a correlation between HSP110 and STAT6 phosphorylation levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that HSP110 could be proposed as a novel target in PMBL and cHL therapy.

XPO1 blockade with KPT-330 promotes apoptosis in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by activating the p53-p21 and p27 pathways

Dysregulated nuclear-cytoplasmic trafficking has been shown to play a role in oncogenesis in several types of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Exportin 1 (XPO1) is responsible for the nuclear export of several proteins and RNA species, mainly tumor suppressors. KPT-330, a small molecule inhibitor of XPO1, is approved for treating relapsed multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is an extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma with an adverse prognosis and limited treatment options in advanced stages. The effect of therapeutically targeting XPO1 with KPT-330 in CTCL has not been established. We report that XPO1 expression is upregulated in CTCL cells. KPT-330 reduces cell proliferation, induces G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. RNA-sequencing was used to explore the underlying mechanisms. Genes associated with the cell cycle and the p53 pathway were significantly enriched with KPT-330 treatment. KPT-330 suppressed XPO1 expression, upregulated p53, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 and their nuclear localization, and downregulated anti-apoptotic protein (Survivin). The in vivo efficacy of KPT-330 was investigated using a bioluminescent xenograft mouse model of CTCL. KPT-330 blocked tumor growth and prolonged survival (p < 0.0002) compared to controls. These findings support investigating the use of KPT-330 and next-generation XPO1 inhibitors in CTCL.

mtADENet: A novel interpretable method integrating multiple types of network-based inference approaches for prediction of adverse drug events

Identification of adverse drug events (ADEs) is crucial to reduce human health risks and accelerate drug safety assessment. ADEs are mainly caused by unintended interactions with primary or additional targets (off-targets). In this study, we proposed a novel interpretable method named mtADENet, which integrates multiple types of network-based inference approaches for ADE prediction. Different from phenotype-based methods, mtADENet introduced computational target profiles predicted by network-based methods to bridge the gap between chemical structures and ADEs, and hence can not only predict ADEs for drugs and novel compounds within or outside the drug-ADE association network, but also provide insights for the elucidation of molecular mechanisms of the ADEs caused by drugs. We constructed a series of network-based prediction models for 23 ADE categories. These models achieved high AUC values ranging from 0.865 to 0.942 in 10-fold cross validation. The best model further showed high performance on four external validation sets, which outperformed two previous network-based methods. To show the practical value of mtADENet, we performed case studies on developmental neurotoxicity and cardio-oncology, and over 50 % of predicted ADEs and targets for drugs and novel compounds were validated by literature. Moreover, mtADENet is freely available at our web server named NetInfer (http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn/netinfer/). In summary, mtADENet would be a powerful tool for ADE prediction and drug safety assessment in drug discovery and development.

Nuclear Export in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Implications for Targeted XPO1 Inhibitors

Exportin-1 (XPO1) is a key player in the nuclear export pathway and is overexpressed in almost all cancers. This is especially relevant for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), where high XPO1 expression is associated with poor prognosis due to its oncogenic role in exporting proteins and RNA that are involved in cancer progression and treatment resistance. Here, we discuss the proteins and RNA transcripts that have been identified as XPO1 cargo in NHL lymphoma including tumour suppressors, immune modulators, and transcription factors, and their implications for oncogenesis. We then highlight the research to date on XPO1 inhibitors such as selinexor and other selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs), which are used to treat some cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies investigating the anti-cancer effects of SINEs from bench to bedside, both as a single agent and in combination, are also reported. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the current research landscape and future directions to better understand and improve the clinical utility of SINE compounds in NHL.

Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers

Compared with traditional therapies, targeted therapy has merits in selectivity, efficacy, and tolerability. Small molecule inhibitors are one of the primary targeted therapies for cancer. Due to their advantages in a wide range of targets, convenient medication, and the ability to penetrate into the central nervous system, many efforts have been devoted to developing more small molecule inhibitors. To date, 88 small molecule inhibitors have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat cancers. Despite remarkable progress, small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment still face many obstacles, such as low response rate, short duration of response, toxicity, biomarkers, and resistance. To better promote the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting cancers, we comprehensively reviewed small molecule inhibitors involved in all the approved agents and pivotal drug candidates in clinical trials arranged by the signaling pathways and the classification of small molecule inhibitors. We discussed lessons learned from the development of these agents, the proper strategies to overcome resistance arising from different mechanisms, and combination therapies concerned with small molecule inhibitors. Through our review, we hoped to provide insights and perspectives for the research and development of small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment.

Selinexor therapy for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review we highlight the most recent studies furthering the clinical development of selinexor, a novel exportin-1 inhibitor, for the treatment of multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three pivotal trials, the SADAL trial for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and the BOSTON and selinexor treatment of refractory myeloma trials for multiple myeloma, have recently led to the regulatory approval of selinexor monotherapy or combination regimens. They are complemented by several earlier phase clinical trials with iterative combinations, adding selinexor to novel therapies and cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens at various stages in the disease courses. In some, selinexor appears synergistic, occasionally overcoming treatment refractoriness, whereas in other situations appears additive. Consistent issues with tolerability are seen across trials, although consensus guidelines on their preemption and management have recently been adopted which may improve treatment success. While comparative data are lacking, the efficacy of selinexor-based regimens does not approach that of contemporaneous cellular and immunotherapies.

SUMMARY

Selinexor is a novel and potentially synergistic therapy for lymphoid malignancies, although requires refined supportive measures and strategies to improve its efficacy. Likely, for continued success, it will need to identify niches that complement recent advances, such as bridging to cellular therapies or maintenance thereafter.

The efficacy of selinexor (KPT-330), an XPO1 inhibitor, on non-hematologic cancers: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE

Selinexor is a novel XPO1 inhibitor which inhibits the export of tumor suppressor proteins and oncoprotein mRNAs, leading to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells. While selinexor is currently FDA approved to treat multiple myeloma, compelling preclinical and early clinical studies reveal selinexor's efficacy in treating hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies, including sarcoma, gastric, bladder, prostate, breast, ovarian, skin, lung, and brain cancers. Current reviews of selinexor primarily highlight its use in hematologic malignancies; however, this review seeks to summarize the recent evidence of selinexor treatment in solid tumors.

METHODS

Pertinent literature searches in PubMed and the Karyopharm Therapeutics website for selinexor and non-hematologic malignancies preclinical and clinical trials.

RESULTS

This review provides evidence that selinexor is a promising agent used alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in non-hematologic malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical investigation of selinexor treatment for solid malignancies is warranted.

Inhibitor of the Nuclear Transport Protein XPO1 Enhances the Anticancer Efficacy of KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Preclinical Models of KRAS G12C-Mutant Cancers

The identification of molecules that can bind covalently to KRAS G12C and lock it in an inactive GDP-bound conformation has opened the door to targeting KRAS G12C selectively. These agents have shown promise in preclinical tumor models and clinical trials. FDA has recently granted approval to sotorasib for KRAS G12C mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients receiving these agents as monotherapy generally develop drug resistance over time. This necessitates the development of multi-targeted approaches that can potentially sensitize tumors to KRAS inhibitors. We generated KRAS G12C inhibitor-resistant cell lines and observed that they exhibit sensitivity toward selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export protein exportin1 (XPO1), as a single agent. KRAS G12C inhibitors in combination with selinexor suppressed the proliferation of KRAS G12C mutant cancer cell lines in a synergistic manner. Moreover, combined treatment of selinexor with KRAS G12C inhibitors resulted in enhanced spheroid disintegration, reduction in the number and size of colonies formed by G12C mutant cancer cells. Mechanistically, the combination of selinexor with KRAS G12C inhibitors suppressed cell growth signaling and downregulated the expression of cell cycle markers, KRAS and NF-kB as well as increased nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor protein Rb. In an in vivo KRAS G12C cell-derived xenograft model, oral administration of a combination of selinexor and sotorasib was demonstrated to reduce tumor burden and enhance survival. In conclusion, we have shown that the nuclear transport protein XPO1 inhibitor can enhance the anticancer activity of KRAS G12C inhibitors in preclinical cancer models.

Significance

In this study, combining nuclear transport inhibitor selinexor with KRAS G12C inhibitors has resulted in potent antitumor effects in preclinical cancer models. This can be an effective combination therapy for cancer patients that do not respond or develop resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitor treatment.

A drug profile on selinexor for the treatment of refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of selinexor, the first commercially available exportin inhibitor, has been evaluated in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received at least 2 lines of therapy. Its role in treatment of DLBCL requires a review of current evidence.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the pharmacology of selinexor and the clinical trials of the medication for the treatment of patients with DLBCL. To clarify the role of selinexor in the treatment of DLBCL, a PubMed search was performed for articles on currently available treatments for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL.

EXPERT OPINION

Selinexor, which is administered orally, benefits from an advantageous pharmacokinetic profile with toxicity limited to hematological and digestive side effects. It has little or no interaction with other medications and no dose adjustment is required for patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Selinexor has been assessed for treatment of R/R DLBCL in one phase I and one phase II trial. Those studies found a 28% overall response rate, including 12% complete remission, with a median duration of response of 9.3 months. If selinexor's effectiveness as monotherapy is limited, it remains an option when there are no other therapeutic possibilities and can then give long-lasting responses.

Altered pathways and targeted therapy in double hit lymphoma

High-grade B-cell lymphoma with translocations involving MYC and BCL2 or BCL6, usually referred to as double hit lymphoma (DHL), is an aggressive hematological malignance with distinct genetic features and poor clinical prognosis. Current standard chemoimmunotherapy fails to confer satisfying outcomes and few targeted therapeutics are available for the treatment against DHL. Recently, the delineating of the genetic landscape in tumors has provided insight into both biology and targeted therapies. Therefore, it is essential to understand the altered signaling pathways of DHL to develop treatment strategies with better clinical benefits. Herein, we summarized the genetic alterations in the two DHL subtypes (DHL-BCL2 and DHL-BCL6). We further elucidate their implications on cellular processes, including anti-apoptosis, epigenetic regulations, B-cell receptor signaling, and immune escape. Ongoing and potential therapeutic strategies and targeted drugs steered by these alterations were reviewed accordingly. Based on these findings, we also discuss the therapeutic vulnerabilities that coincide with these genetic changes. We believe that the understanding of the DHL studies will provide insight into this disease and capacitate the finding of more effective treatment strategies.

Selective inhibition of nuclear export: a promising approach in the shifting treatment paradigms for hematological neoplasms

Novel targeted therapeutics alone or in rational combinations are likely to dominate the future management of various hematological neoplasms. However, the challenges currently faced are the molecular heterogeneity in driver lesions and genetic plasticity leading to multiple resistance pathways. Thus, progress has overall been gradual. For example, despite the advent of targeted agents against actionable drivers like FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the prognosis remains suboptimal in newly diagnosed and dismal in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, due to other molecular abnormalities contributing to inherent and acquired treatment resistance. Nuclear export inhibitors are of keen interest because they can inhibit several active tumorigenic processes simultaneously and also synergize with other targeted drugs and chemotherapy. XPO1 (or CRM1, chromosome maintenance region 1) is one of the most studied exportins involved in transporting critical cargoes, including tumor suppressor proteins like p27, p53, and RB1. Apart from the TSP cargo transport and its role in drug resistance, XPO1 inhibition results in retention of master transcription factors essential for cell differentiation, cell survival, and autophagy, rendering cells more susceptible to the effects of other antineoplastic agents, including targeted therapies. This review will dissect the role of XPO1 inhibition in hematological neoplasms, focusing on mechanistic insights gleaned mainly from work with SINE compounds. Future potential combinatorial strategies will be discussed.

Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Targeted therapies continue to change the landscape of lymphoma treatment, resulting in improved therapy options and patient outcomes. Numerous agents are now approved for use in the indolent lymphomas and many others under development demonstrate significant promise. In this article, we review the landscape of targeted agents that apply to the indolent lymphomas, predominantly follicular lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia and marginal zone lymphoma. The review covers small molecule inhibitors, immunomodulators and targeted immunotherapies, as well as presenting emerging and promising combination therapies.

Selinexor Enhances NK Cell Activation Against Malignant B Cells via Downregulation of HLA-E

Selinexor is an FDA approved selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein exportin-1 (XPO1) and causes specific cancer cell death via nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins. Design of rational studies for the use of selinexor in combination with other therapeutic agents, such as immunotherapies, requires a fundamental understanding of the effects of selinexor on the immune system. One important emerging area of immunotherapy are natural killer (NK) cell based therapeutics. NK cell function is tightly regulated by a balance of signals derived from multiple activating and inhibitory receptors. Thus in cancer, up-regulation of stress ligands recognised by activating receptors or down-regulation of HLA class I recognised by inhibitory receptors can result in an anti-cancer NK cell response. Changes in XPO1 function therefore have the potential to affect NK cell function through shifting this balance. We therefore sought to investigate how selinexor may affect NK cell function. Selinexor pre-treatment of lymphoma cells significantly increased NK cell mediated cytotoxicity against SU-DHL-4, JeKo-1 and Ramos cells, concurrent with increased CD107a and IFNγ expression on NK cells. In addition, selinexor enhanced ADCC against lymphoma cells coated with the anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and obinutuzumab. In probing the likely mechanism, we identified that XPO1 inhibition significantly reduced the surface expression of HLA-E on lymphoma cell lines and on primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. HLA-E binds the inhibitory receptor NKG2A and in accordance with this, selinexor selectively increased activation of NKG2A+ NK cells. Our data reveals that selinexor, in addition to its direct cytotoxic activity, also activates an anti-cancer immune response via disruption of the inhibitory NKG2A:HLA-E axis.

Survival among patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with single-agent selinexor in the SADAL study

Patients with RR DLBCL who have received ≥ 2 lines of therapy have limited treatment options and an expected overall survival (OS) of < 6 months. The SADAL study evaluated single-agent oral selinexor in patients with RR DLBCL and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.1% with median duration of response (DOR) of 9.3 months. The analyses described here evaluated a number of subpopulations in order to understand how response correlates with survival outcomes in order to identify patients who could most optimally benefit from selinexor treatment. Median age was 67 years; 44.8% of patients were ≥ 70 years of age. The median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.2, 13.7) at a median follow-up of 14.8 months. The median OS was not reached in patients with a CR or PR, while patients who did not respond have a median OS of 4.9 months (p < 0.0001). Patients < 70 years had an OS of 11.1 months compared with 7.8 months in patients ≥ 70 years. Among patients with or without prior ASCT, the median OS was 10.9 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among patients with disease refractory to the most recent DLBCL treatment regimen, the median OS was 7.0 months compared with 11.1 months for disease not refractory to the most recent treatment. In a patient population in which survival is expected to be < 6 months, treatment with single-agent oral selinexor was associated with a median survival of 9 months. Increased median OS observed in patients responding to selinexor was consistent across subgroups regardless of age, prior ASCT therapy, or refractory status. Randomized studies of selinexor in combination with a variety of other anti-DLBCL agents are planned. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02227251) on August 28, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02227251 .

2021 Update on Diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A review of current data and potential applications on risk stratification and management

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common type of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases with different biology, clinical presentations, and response to treatment. R-CHOP remains the mainstay of therapy and can achieve long-term disease control in nearly 90% of patients presenting with limited-stage and in up to 60% of those presenting with advanced stages. Advances on the understanding of the genetic landscape and molecular features of DLBCL have identified high-risk subsets with poor outcomes to chemo-immunotherapy that are actively being studied in clinical trials. Novel therapies could potentially improve outcomes for patients with high-risk disease. Studies evaluating risk-adapted therapy based on classification by cell of origin (COO) and molecular features are ongoing. Developments in the fields of immunotherapy, mostly with adoptive T-cell therapy, have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed refractory disease. In this review, we will summarize the recent data and discuss ongoing efforts to improve DLBCL treatment in the frontline and relapsed refractory settings.