1
|
Landes JR, Moore SA, Bartley BR, Doan HQ, Rady PL, Tyring SK. The efficacy of selinexor (KPT-330), an XPO1 inhibitor, on non-hematologic cancers: a comprehensive review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022. [PMID: 35941226 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Selinexor is a novel XPO1 inhibitor which inhibits the export of tumor suppressor proteins and oncoprotein mRNAs, leading to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells. While selinexor is currently FDA approved to treat multiple myeloma, compelling preclinical and early clinical studies reveal selinexor's efficacy in treating hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies, including sarcoma, gastric, bladder, prostate, breast, ovarian, skin, lung, and brain cancers. Current reviews of selinexor primarily highlight its use in hematologic malignancies; however, this review seeks to summarize the recent evidence of selinexor treatment in solid tumors. METHODS Pertinent literature searches in PubMed and the Karyopharm Therapeutics website for selinexor and non-hematologic malignancies preclinical and clinical trials. RESULTS This review provides evidence that selinexor is a promising agent used alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in non-hematologic malignancies. CONCLUSION Further clinical investigation of selinexor treatment for solid malignancies is warranted.
Collapse
|
2
|
Schuster M, Zijlstra J, Casasnovas RO, Vermaat JSP, Kalakonda N, Goy A, Choquet S, Neste EVD, Hill B, Thieblemont C, Cavallo F, De la Cruz F, Kuruvilla J, Hamad N, Jaeger U, Caimi P, Gurion R, Warzocha K, Bakhshi S, Sancho JM, Follows G, Egyed M, Offner F, Vassilakopoulos T, Samal P, Ku M, Ma X, Corona K, Chamoun K, Shah J, Shacham S, Kauffman MG, Canales M, Maerevoet M. Effect of Prior Therapy and Disease Refractoriness on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): A Post-hoc Analysis of the SADAL Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2022; 22:483-494. [PMID: 35078739 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease. PATIENTS Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly. RESULTS The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%). CONCLUSION Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josée Zijlstra
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Andre Goy
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States
| | | | | | - Brian Hill
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Catherine Thieblemont
- APHP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Hemato-oncology, Paris, France & Diderot University, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Nada Hamad
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | | | - Paolo Caimi
- UH Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | | | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Dr. B. R. A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Priyanka Samal
- Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Odisha, India
| | - Matthew Ku
- St.Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Xiwen Ma
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, United States
| | - Kelly Corona
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, United States
| | | | - Jatin Shah
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Galinski B, Alexander TB, Mitchell DA, Chatwin HV, Awah C, Green AL, Weiser DA. Therapeutic Targeting of Exportin-1 in Childhood Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6161. [PMID: 34944778 PMCID: PMC8699059 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Overexpression of Exportin-1 (XPO1), a key regulator of nuclear-to-cytoplasmic transport, is associated with inferior patient outcomes across a range of adult malignancies. Targeting XPO1 with selinexor has demonstrated promising results in clinical trials, leading to FDA approval of its use for multiple relapsed/refractory cancers. However, XPO1 biology and selinexor sensitivity in childhood cancer is only recently being explored. In this review, we will focus on the differential biology of childhood and adult cancers as it relates to XPO1 and key cargo proteins. We will further explore the current state of pre-clinical and clinical development of XPO1 inhibitors in childhood cancers. Finally, we will outline potentially promising future therapeutic strategies for, as well as potential challenges to, integrating XPO1 inhibition to improve outcomes for children with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basia Galinski
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; (B.G.); (D.A.M.); (C.A.)
| | - Thomas B. Alexander
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| | - Daniel A. Mitchell
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; (B.G.); (D.A.M.); (C.A.)
| | - Hannah V. Chatwin
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Chidiebere Awah
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; (B.G.); (D.A.M.); (C.A.)
| | - Adam L. Green
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Daniel A. Weiser
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; (B.G.); (D.A.M.); (C.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maerevoet M, Zijlstra JM, Follows G, Casasnovas RO, Vermaat JSP, Kalakonda N, Goy A, Choquet S, Van Den Neste E, Hill B, Thieblemont C, Cavallo F, De la Cruz F, Kuruvilla J, Hamad N, Jaeger U, Caimi P, Gurion R, Warzocha K, Bakhshi S, Sancho JM, Schuster M, Egyed M, Offner F, Vassilakopoulos TP, Samal P, Ku M, Ma X, Corona K, Chamoun K, Shah J, Shacham S, Kauffman MG, Canales M. Survival among patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with single-agent selinexor in the SADAL study. J Hematol Oncol 2021; 14:111. [PMID: 34271963 PMCID: PMC8283921 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01122-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with RR DLBCL who have received ≥ 2 lines of therapy have limited treatment options and an expected overall survival (OS) of < 6 months. The SADAL study evaluated single-agent oral selinexor in patients with RR DLBCL and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.1% with median duration of response (DOR) of 9.3 months. The analyses described here evaluated a number of subpopulations in order to understand how response correlates with survival outcomes in order to identify patients who could most optimally benefit from selinexor treatment. Median age was 67 years; 44.8% of patients were ≥ 70 years of age. The median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.2, 13.7) at a median follow-up of 14.8 months. The median OS was not reached in patients with a CR or PR, while patients who did not respond have a median OS of 4.9 months (p < 0.0001). Patients < 70 years had an OS of 11.1 months compared with 7.8 months in patients ≥ 70 years. Among patients with or without prior ASCT, the median OS was 10.9 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among patients with disease refractory to the most recent DLBCL treatment regimen, the median OS was 7.0 months compared with 11.1 months for disease not refractory to the most recent treatment. In a patient population in which survival is expected to be < 6 months, treatment with single-agent oral selinexor was associated with a median survival of 9 months. Increased median OS observed in patients responding to selinexor was consistent across subgroups regardless of age, prior ASCT therapy, or refractory status. Randomized studies of selinexor in combination with a variety of other anti-DLBCL agents are planned. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02227251) on August 28, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02227251 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Maerevoet
- Service Hématologie, Institut Jules Bordet, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Josee M Zijlstra
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Andre Goy
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, USA
| | | | | | | | - Catherine Thieblemont
- APHP, Hemato-oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.,Diderot University, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Nada Hamad
- St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | | | | | - Ronit Gurion
- Rabin MC, Petah Tiqwa, Israel.,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Dr. B. R. A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Priyanka Samal
- Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Matthew Ku
- St.Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Xiwen Ma
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|