1
|
Jain N, Mamgain M, Chowdhury SM, Jindal U, Sharma I, Sehgal L, Epperla N. Beyond Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in mantle cell lymphoma: bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, CAR T-cells, and novel agents. J Hematol Oncol 2023; 16:99. [PMID: 37626420 PMCID: PMC10463717 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-023-01496-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Mantle cell lymphoma is a B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), representing 2-6% of all NHLs and characterized by overexpression of cyclin D1. The last decade has seen the development of many novel treatment approaches in MCL, most notably the class of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). BTKi has shown excellent outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and is now being studied in the first-line setting. However, patients eventually progress on BTKi due to the development of resistance. Additionally, there is an alteration in the tumor microenvironment in these patients with varying biological and therapeutic implications. Hence, it is necessary to explore novel therapeutic strategies that can be effective in those who progressed on BTKi or potentially circumvent resistance. In this review, we provide a brief overview of BTKi, then discuss the various mechanisms of BTK resistance including the role of genetic alteration, cancer stem cells, tumor microenvironment, and adaptive reprogramming bypassing the effect of BTK inhibition, and then provide a comprehensive review of current and emerging therapeutic options beyond BTKi including novel agents, CAR T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Jain
- Division of Cancer Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002 India
| | - Mukesh Mamgain
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| | - Sayan Mullick Chowdhury
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Udita Jindal
- Division of Cancer Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002 India
| | - Isha Sharma
- Division of Cancer Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India
| | - Lalit Sehgal
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Narendranath Epperla
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suite 7198, 2121 Kenny Rd, Columbus, OH 43221 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Similar Findings on 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in a Patient With Widespread Metastatic Hepatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:179-181. [PMID: 36252734 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A patient with suspected malignant tumor underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Based on the findings, the patient was suspected of having multiple myeloma. Then the patient underwent 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT, which showed similar results to 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Finally, the patient was eventually diagnosed with neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Collapse
|
3
|
The Role of [ 68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT or PET/MRI in Lymphoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153814. [PMID: 35954476 PMCID: PMC9367619 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate published data about the role of gallium-68 Pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients affected by lymphoma. A comprehensive computer literature search of the Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted including articles indexed up to June 2022. In total, 14 studies or subsets in studies were eligible for inclusion. From the analyses of the selected studies, the following main findings have been found: (1) lymphomas can be considered [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor avid diseases, also in cases of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]FDG-not avid forms such as lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL); (2) among lymphomas, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and MZL are those with highest [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor uptake; (3) [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT or PET/MRI is a useful tool for the staging and treatment response evaluation; (4) [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET seems to have a better diagnostic performance than [18F]FDG PET in evaluating lymphomas. Despite several limitations affecting this analysis, especially related to the heterogeneity of the included studies, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET may be considered a useful imaging method for staging and treatment response evaluation of several lymphomas, especially MZL, CNSL and LPL.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwon D, Zhang Z, Zeisler J, Kuo HT, Lin KS, Benard F. Reducing the Kidney Uptake of High Contrast CXCR4 PET Imaging Agents via Linker Modifications. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14071502. [PMID: 35890397 PMCID: PMC9316317 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is highly expressed in many subtypes of cancers, notably in several kidney-based malignancies. We synthesized, labeled, and assessed a series of radiotracers based on a previous high contrast PET imaging radiopharmaceutical [68Ga]Ga-BL02, with modifications to its linker and metal chelator, in order to improve its tumor-to-kidney contrast ratio. Methods: Based on the design of BL02, a piperidine-based cationic linker (BL06) and several anionic linkers (tri-Aad (BL17); tri-D-Glu (BL20); tri-Asp (BL25); and tri-cysteic acid (BL31)) were substituted for the triglutamate linker. Additionally, the DOTA chelator was swapped for a DOTAGA chelator (BL30). Each radiotracer was labeled with 68Ga and evaluated in CXCR4-expressing Daudi xenograft mice with biodistribution and/or PET imaging studies. Results: Of all the evaluated radiotracers, [68Ga]Ga-BL31 showed the most promising biodistribution profile, with a lower kidney uptake compared to [68Ga]Ga-BL02, while retaining the high imaging contrast capabilities of [68Ga]Ga-BL02. [68Ga]Ga-BL31 also compared favorably to [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor, with superior imaging contrast in all non-target organs. The other anionic linker-based radiotracers showed either equivocal or worse contrast ratios compared to [68Ga]Ga-BL02; however, [68Ga]Ga-BL25 also showed lower kidney uptake, as compared to that of [68Ga]Ga-BL02. Meanwhile, [68Ga]Ga-BL06 had high non-target organ uptake and relatively lower tumor uptake, while [68Ga]Ga-BL30 showed significantly increased kidney uptake and similar tumor uptake values. Conclusions: [68Ga]Ga-BL31 is an optimized CXCR4-targeting radiopharmaceutical with lower kidney retention that has clinical potential for PET imaging and radioligand therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kwon
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (Z.Z.); (J.Z.); (H.-T.K.); (K.-S.L.)
| | - Zhengxing Zhang
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (Z.Z.); (J.Z.); (H.-T.K.); (K.-S.L.)
| | - Jutta Zeisler
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (Z.Z.); (J.Z.); (H.-T.K.); (K.-S.L.)
| | - Hsiou-Ting Kuo
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (Z.Z.); (J.Z.); (H.-T.K.); (K.-S.L.)
| | - Kuo-Shyan Lin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (Z.Z.); (J.Z.); (H.-T.K.); (K.-S.L.)
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Francois Benard
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; (D.K.); (Z.Z.); (J.Z.); (H.-T.K.); (K.-S.L.)
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-604-675-8206
| |
Collapse
|