Risk Factors for Recurrence in Patients with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma after Fertility-Sparing Treatments

Efficacy of fertility-sparing treatment with LNG-IUS is associated with different ProMisE subtypes of endometrial carcinoma or atypical endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether proactive molecular risk classifier for endometrial cancer (ProMisE) could be used to assess the prognosis of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 93 AEH or early-stage EC patients who received LNG-IUS to preserve fertility . By immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing, 4 subtypes of ProMisE were identified (p53 wild type [p53 wt], mismatch repair-deficient [MMRd], p53-abnormal, and POLE-mutated). The primary outcome was the time to complete response (CR) after LNG-IUS therapy. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate after CR and success rate of conception.

RESULTS

Among the 93 patients, 15 (16.1%) were classified as MMRd, 6 (6.5%) as POLE-mutated, 5 (5.4%) as p53-abnormal, and 67 (72.0%) as p53 wt. Comparison of serum cancer antigen 125, family history of tumor, and positive rates of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 protein and Ki67 protein in 4 groups showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05). Patients with the p53-abnormal subtype had the lowest overall CR rate (40%) and the highest recurrence rate (2/2). Patients with POLE-mutated subtype had the best prognosis, and all 6 patients achieved CR. When patients achieved complete remission, assisted reproductive technology was more likely to help them conceive than natural conception (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-stage EC or AEH who are more likely to benefit from fertility-sparing treatment can be identified using ProMisE classifier. Patients with POLE-mutated are suitable for fertility-sparing treatment with LNG-IUS.

Radiomics-based fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial carcinoma: a review

In recent years, with the increasing incidence of endometrial carcinoma in women of child-bearing age, to decision of whether to preserve patients' fertility during treatment has become increasingly complex, presenting a formidable challenge for both physicians and patients. Non-fertility-sparing treatment can remove lesions more thoroughly than fertility-sparing treatment. However, patients will permanently lose their fertility. In contrast, fertility-sparing treatment can treat tumors without impairing fertility, but the risk of disease progression is high as compared with non-fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, it is extremely important to accurately identify patients who are suitable for fertility-sparing treatments. The evaluation of prognostic factors, including myometrial invasion, the presence of lymph node metastases, and histopathological type, is vital for determining whether a patient can receive fertility-sparing treatment. As a non-invasive and quantitative approach, radiomics has the potential to assist radiologists and other clinicians in determining more precise judgments with regard to the above factors by extracting imaging features and establishing predictive models. In this review, we summarized currently available fertility-sparing strategies and reviewed the performance of radiomics in predicting risk factors associated with fertility-sparing treatment. This review aims to assist clinicians in identifying patients suitable for fertility-sparing treatment more accurately and comprehensively and informs more appropriate and rigorous treatment decisions for endometrial cancer patients of child-bearing age.Critical relevance statement: Radiomics is a promising tool that may assist clinicians identify risk factors about fertility-sparing more accurately and comprehensively.

Clinical outcomes of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device present during controlled ovarian stimulation in patients with early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia after fertility-sparing treatments: 10-year experience in one tertiary hospital in China

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the oncologic and pregnancy outcomes of patients with early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EMC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) treated with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with or without levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) after fertility-sparing treatment (FSTs).

METHODS

A total of 67 patients with EMC or AEH who achieved complete response after FSTs and underwent COS between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors for recurrence after COS.

RESULTS

The average age was 32.9 ± 3.46 years. 23.9 % of these patients relapsed after COS during the follow-up period. The 2-year cumulative recurrence rate was 14.9 % (9.1 % and 20.6 % in the LNG-IUD and control groups, respectively). Compared with the control group, the recurrence rate was lower in patients with LNG-IUDs present during COS (12.1 % vs 35.5 %, p = 0.027). The clinical pregnancy (42.4 % vs 52.9 %, p = 0.392) and live birth (21.2 % vs 29.4 %, p = 0.444) rates were similar between the LNG-IUD and control groups. Age, body mass index (BMI), histology, FST type and time to complete response were not related to prognosis after COS. After adjusting for age and BMI in a multivariate Cox regression model, the use of LNG-IUD during COS was a favorable factor for better oncologic outcomes after COS (HR 0.263, 95 %CI 0.084-0.822, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early stage EMC and AEH treated with assisted reproductive technology after FSTs might benefit from LNG-IUDs present during COS.

Effect and Management of Excess Weight in the Context of Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Patients With Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: Eight-Year Experience of 227 Cases

Objective

To investigate the oncologic and reproductive outcomes of fertility-sparing treatments (FSTs) in atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial cancer (EC) patients with excess weight (EW).

Methods

This retrospective study comprised patients with AEH or EC who achieved a complete response (CR) after FST from 2010 to 2018. The clinical characteristics, oncological and reproductive outcomes were compared between the excess weight (EW) group (body mass index (BMI)≥25 kg/m²) and normal weight (NW) group (BMI<25 kg/m²). The risk factors associated with recurrence and unsuccessful pregnancy in patients with EW were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 227 patients were enrolled, including 139 (61.2%) in EW group and 88 (38.8%) in NW group. In patients with EW, the pregnancy rate, the live birth rate and the relapse rate were 29.8%, 23.4%, and 30.9%, respectively. In patients with NW, these rates were 61.1%, 47.2%, and 31.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the time to remission (P=0.865) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.750). Patients in NW group achieved a better pregnancy rate than patients in the EW group (P=0.034). The patients with EW using ovulation induction to increase fertility tended to have a shorter time to pregnancy (P=0.042). However, no significant risk factors associated with unsuccessful pregnancy were identified after the multivariate analysis. In terms of DFS, the combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and LNG-IUD was better for patients with EW than GnRH-a or oral progestin therapy alone (P=0.044, adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.432, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.152-1.229), especially for patients with EW diagnosed with EC (P=0.032).

Conclusion

FSTs for overweight and obese patients should be more individualized. GnRH-a and/or LNG-IUD may be options prior to FSTs in patients with EW. Further prospective studies are needed.

The Role of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) in Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) is a decapeptide first described to be secreted by the hypothalamus to regulate pituitary gonadotropin secretion. In this systematic review, we analyze and summarize the data indicating that most EC express GnRH and its receptor (GnRH-R) as part of an autocrine system regulating proliferation, the cell cycle, and apoptosis. We analyze the available data on the expression and function of GnRH-II, its putative receptor, and its signal transduction. GnRH-I and GnRH-II agonists, and antagonists as well as cytotoxic GnRH-I analogs, have been shown to inhibit proliferation and to induce apoptosis in human EC cell lines in pre-clinical models. Treatment with conventional doses of GnRH-agonists that suppress pituitary gonadotropin secretion and ovarian estrogen production has become part of fertility preserving therapy of early EC or its pre-cancer (atypical endometrial hyperplasia). Conventional doses of GnRH-agonists had marginal activity in advanced or recurrent EC. Higher doses or more potent analogs including GnRH-II antagonists have not yet been used clinically. The cytotoxic GnRH-analog Zoptarelin Doxorubicin has shown encouraging activity in a phase II trial in patients with advanced or recurrent EC, which expressed GnRH-R. In a phase III trial in patients with EC of unknown GnRH-R expression, the cytotoxic GnRH doxorubicin conjugate was not superior to free doxorubicin. Further well-designed clinical trials exploiting the GnRH-system in EC might be useful.

Predictors of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a tertiary gynaecological cancer centre in Western Australia

AIM

Our objective was to assess clinical and pathological factors associated with a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia with a particular emphasis on the grading of atypia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review over five years on patients (N = 97) who underwent hysterectomy for a diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a statewide public tertiary gynaecologic oncology centre. Clinical and pathological characteristics were obtained.

RESULTS

The rate of concurrent endometrial carcinoma was 34% (n = 33) with most being stage 1A endometrioid. A significant group difference was reported for age at diagnosis (t = -2.20 P = 0.031 d = 0.43) with carcinoma patients on average older (M_age  = 60.2 (8.9) years) than patients without carcinoma (M_age  = 55.5 (12.3) years). No significant group differences were found for body mass index, endometrial thickness or time between diagnosis and treatment. Significantly higher rates of carcinoma were reported in patients with moderate atypical hyperplasia (27.6%) and severe atypical hyperplasia (66.7%), compared to mild atypical hyperplasia (7.1%). Only severe atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio (OR) = 21.5, 95% CI 2.8-163.1, P = 0.003) and postmenopausal status (OR = 13.2, 95% CI 1.3-139.0, P = 0.032) significantly increased the risk of carcinoma in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Severe atypical hyperplasia and postmenopausal status were significant predictors of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The grading of atypical hyperplasia may be utilised by gynaecologic oncologists in the triage and referral process of managing these patients; however, the grading system requires external validation in larger prospective studies.

Fertility issue in early stage endometrial cancer patients

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common cancer of the female reproductive system in developed countries. The incidence of EC has been increasing in young women. Approximately 4% of cases are aged <40 years. These young women may wish to delay therapy until after they have children. Common complaints in patients with EC include irregular vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain, and enlarged uterus. Imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be utilized in detecting EC. Although the recommended treatment of EC is hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without systemic lymph node dissection, loss of reproductive function is the primary limiting factor of this surgical approach. Some studies have reported favorable results with high-dose oral progestins or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or hysteroscopic tumor resection followed by treatment with high-dose oral progestins. The most widely utilized medical treatment regimens are medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 250–600 mg/day or megestrol acetate (MA) 160–480 mg/day. However, there is still a lack of evidence to establish the optimal dose and duration of progestin treatment. Patients with complete remission (CR) who wish to conceive must be encouraged, and referral to a fertility clinic should be offered as soon as possible. The key aspect of fertility-sparing management in women with EC appears to be the selection of appropriate candidates. Owing to the rarity of this condition, management may often be suboptimal. The aim of this review is to assess the current approaches to management of young women with EC who wish to preserve their fertility.