1
|
Karam E, Hollenbach M, Ali EA, Auriemma F, Gulla A, Heise C, Regner S, Gaujoux S, Regimbeau JM, Kähler G, Seyfried S, Vaillant JC, De Ponthaud C, Sauvanet A, Birnbaum D, Regenet N, Truant S, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Bruzzi M, Lupinacci RM, Brunel M, Belfiori G, Barbier L, Salamé E, Souche FR, Schwarz L, Maggino L, Salvia R, Gagniére J, Del Chiaro M, Leung G, Hackert T, Kleemann T, Paik WH, Caca K, Dugic A, Muehldorfer S, Schumacher B, Albers D. Outcomes of rescue procedures in the management of locally recurrent ampullary tumors: A Pancreas 2000/EPC study. Surgery 2023; 173:1254-1262. [PMID: 36642655 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ampullary lesions are rare and can be locally treated either with endoscopic papillectomy or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy. Management of local recurrence after a first-line treatment has been poorly studied. METHODS Patients with a local recurrence of an ampullary lesion initially treated with endoscopic papillectomy or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy were retrospectively included from a multi-institutional database (58 centers) between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were included, 21 (20.4%) treated with redo endoscopic papillectomy, 14 (13.6%) with transduodenal surgical ampullectomy, and 68 (66%) with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Redo endoscopic papillectomy had low morbidity with 4.8% (n = 1) severe to fatal complications and a R0 rate of 81% (n = 17). Transduodenal surgical ampullectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy after a first procedure had a higher morbidity with Clavien III and more complications, respectively, 28.6% (n = 4) and 25% (n = 17); R0 resection rates were 85.7% (n = 12) and 92.6% (n = 63), both without statistically significant difference compared to endoscopic papillectomy (P = .1 and 0.2). Pancreaticoduodenectomy had 4.4% (n = 2) mortality. No deaths were registered after transduodenal surgical ampullectomy or endoscopic papillectomy. Recurrences treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy were more likely to be adenocarcinomas (79.4%, n = 54 vs 21.4%, n = 3 for transduodenal surgical ampullectomy and 4.8%, n = 1 for endoscopic papillectomy, P < .0001). Three-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable. CONCLUSION Endoscopy is appropriate for noninvasive recurrences, with resection rate and survival outcomes comparable to surgery. Surgery applies more to invasive recurrences, with transduodenal surgical ampullectomy rather for carcinoma in situ and early cancers and pancreaticoduodenectomy for more advanced tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Karam
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Tours University Hospital, France.
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- University of Leipzig Medical Center, Medical Department II-Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology, and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy
| | - Aiste Gulla
- Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; Johns Hopkins University, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, General Surgery, Washington, DC
| | - Christian Heise
- Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Department of Medicine I-Gastroenterology, Pulmonology, Halle, Germany
| | - Sara Regner
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Center Hospitalo-Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Georg Kähler
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Surgery, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Surgery, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jean C Vaillant
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Charles De Ponthaud
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Clichy, France
| | - David Birnbaum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Regenet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Deparment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lille, France
| | | | - Matthieu Bruzzi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Renato M Lupinacci
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Martin Brunel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital André Mignot, Versailles, France
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Louise Barbier
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Tours University Hospital, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Tours University Hospital, France
| | - Francois R Souche
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, France
| | - Laura Maggino
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics, and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics, and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Johan Gagniére
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France; U1071 Inserm / Clermont-Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO
| | - Galen Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, PA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kleemann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Germany
| | - Woo H Paik
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Diabetes and Infectious Diseases, RKH Clinic Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Ana Dugic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Steffen Muehldorfer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | | | - David Albers
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Contilia Clinic Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu F, Cheng JL, Cui J, Xu ZZ, Fu Z, Liu J, Tian H. Surgical method choice and coincidence rate of pathological diagnoses in transduodenal ampullectomy: A retrospective case series study and review of the literature. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:717-726. [PMID: 30968036 PMCID: PMC6448071 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i6.717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transduodenal ampullectomy (TDA) is not in wide clinical use due to its low radical effect and a high recurrence rate of tumors. However, TDA is still an effective treatment method; it has great clinical value in cases of duodenal benign tumors, precancerous lesions, and benign and malignant borderline tumors, and can avoid the risks associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy with larger resection range and greater thoroughness than endoscopic papillectomy.
AIM To investigate the surgical method choice and the coincidence rate of pathological diagnoses in TDA for ampullary neoplasms.
METHODS Ten patients with ampullary neoplasms underwent TDA based on the fact that their endoscopic biopsy results suggested benign lesions, and the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-assessed tumors were resectable. All cases underwent duodenal ampullary lesion endoscopic biopsy, intraoperative frozen-section pathological examination, and postoperative pathological examination.
RESULTS This study included seven patients with benign tumors and three with malignant tumors (1 pTis, 2 pT1), according to the postoperative pathology results. The coincidence rate of the postoperative pathology results with the intraoperative frozen-section biopsy results was 100% (10/10), and the coincidence rate with the endoscopic biopsy results was 70% (7/10) based on pathological characteristics. The endoscopic biopsy false-negative rate was 30% (3/10). All patients were followed for 6 to 70 mo without tumor recurrence or metastasis.
CONCLUSION The coincidence rate of postoperative pathology results, intraoperative frozen-section pathology results, and endoscopic biopsy results is the restraining factor of TDA clinical application. Endoscopic biopsy results and EUS have importance relevance to surgical planning. Intraoperative frozen-section pathology results have a significant influence on the choice of surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jia-Lin Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
- Taishan Medical University, Tai’an 271016, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jing Cui
- Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zong-Zhen Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zhen Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
| | - Ju Liu
- Medical Research Center, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hu Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Brock A, Conaway MR, Yoshida C, Moskaluk CA, Adams RB, Tokar J, Yeaton P. Factors predictive of malignancy and endoscopic resectability in ampullary neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:2335-9. [PMID: 15571579 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40391.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic treatment of ampullary lesions has been well described, though it remains uncertain if specific features predict malignancy, and whether identifiable factors are associated with successful endoscopic resection of benign lesions. METHODS Fifty-six consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation of ampullary neoplasia between March 2000 and May 2004 were included in the study. Clinical presentation, underlying medical conditions, endoscopic treatment, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to define extent of local involvement, pathology results, and outcome were documented. Data elements for analysis included EUS findings, lesion lifting with submucosal injection, age, gender, tumor size, and endoscopic intervention. Analyses were performed to determine the ability to predict malignancy and the ability to extirpate benign lesions. RESULTS Thirty-one males and 25 females were included; mean age was 62 yr. Final diagnoses included 29 adenomas, 20 adenocarcinomas, 4 adenomyomas, 2 paragangliomas, and 1 neuroendocrine tumor. Thirty of 35 patients with benign lesions had extirpation with a mean of two endoscopic procedures. Complications of endoscopic resection included cholangitis (1), bleeding (2), and pancreatitis (4). The presence of malignancy was associated by multivariate analysis with the inability to obtain a cleavage plane with saline injection. Univariate analysis also identified EUS T stage as a predictor of malignancy. In benign lesions, none of the analyzed variables predicted successful endoscopic resection. CONCLUSION In ampullary lesions, failure to achieve a cleavage plane with submucosal injection is the strongest predictor of malignancy followed by EUS T stage. Endoscopic treatment of benign ampullary neoplasia is effective; no factor was predictive of successful extirpation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Kahaleh
- Departments of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0708, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martin JA, Haber GB. Ampullary adenoma: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13:649-69. [PMID: 14986792 DOI: 10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00101-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Ampullary adenomas occur sporadically and in the setting of familial polyposis syndromes. In either case, and whether symptomatic at presentation or found asymptomatically in the setting of endoscopic screening programs, they are premalignant lesions with risk for malignant degeneration to carcinoma following the adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence that is well recognized in colonic adenocarcinoma. Accordingly, many experts advocate excision, although others cite the low rate of histologic progression suggested by some recent studies as justification for close endoscopic surveillance rather than excision before demonstration of dysplastic change. This recommendation, however, is complicated by considerable data underscoring the limited accuracy of endoscopic forceps biopsy in detecting occult foci of carcinoma within ampullary adenoma. Thus, the optimal management of these lesions continues to generate considerable controversy. Indications for excision of an ampullary adenoma include treatment of immediate symptoms as well as prevention of malignant degeneration. Although pancreaticoduodenectomy has long been considered the standard procedure for ampullary carcinoma, much controversy exists regarding the procedure of choice for ampullary adenoma. Radical surgery (pancreaticoduodenectomy) possesses the advantage of low recurrence rate but at the expense of higher morbidity (25%-65%) and mortality (0%-10%). Local surgical excision (surgical ampullectomy) possesses the advantages of lower morbidity (0%-25%), essentially nil mortality, and possibly decreased length of hospital stay, but decidedly higher recurrence rates (generally 5%-30%) and the need for postoperative endoscopic surveillance. Snare ampullectomy is a newer endoscopic excisional technique for which limited data are available; advantages compared with radical surgery mirror those of local surgical excision, with apparent lower mortality (0%-1%) and lower morbidity (12%). Presumed advantages compared with local surgical excision include lack of necessity for general anesthesia and laparotomy with comparable morbidity. Disadvantages seem to include limited availability of experienced operators, procedural complexity sometimes requiring adjunctive modalities such as fulguration, the need for multiple procedures (mean, 2.0 procedures) to effect complete excision, and recurrence rates approaching 30%, with a requirement for continued endoscopic surveillance. Ultimately, choice is driven by availability of local expertise, patient tolerance of or expected compliance with long-term endoscopic surveillance programs, presence or absence of coexisting familial polyposis syndromes, medical comorbidities, and overall life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Martin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|