Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in portal hypertensive gastropathy

Role of plasma von Willebrand factor antigen in prediction of esophageal varices in pediatric and adolescent patients with portal hypertension

Background

Ruptured esophageal varices (EVs) are a leading cause of death in Portal hypertension (PHT), it has been a big concern of research to screen EVs through non-invasive approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the role of plasma von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF-Ag) assay for early detection of EVs in patients with portal hypertension. This was a cross-sectional study, done on 47 portal hypertensive children and adolescents who were collected from the Pediatrics Hepatology Clinic, Children Hospital, Ain Shams University. All patients were subjected to comprehensive history taking, thorough clinical examination, routine investigations, abdominal ultrasound, upper GI endoscopy, and measurement of plasma VWF-Ag level. The patients were divided based on their endoscopic findings into two groups; a varices group which included 37 patients, and a non-varices group which included 10 patients.

Results

VWF-Ag rise significantly in patients with EVs, revealing a direct positive association with the degree of EVs.

Conclusion

The plasma VWF-Ag can be applied as a non-invasive evidence of the presence and grading of EVs.

Role of the posterior mucosal defense barrier in portal hypertensive gastropathy

Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is a complication of cirrhotic or noncirrhotic portal hypertension. PHG is very important in the clinic because it can cause acute or even massive blood loss, and its treatment efficacy and prognosis are poor. Currently, the incidence of PHG in patients with cirrhosis is 20-80%, but its pathogenesis is complicated and poorly understood. Studies have shown that portal hypertension can cause changes in gastric mucosal microcirculation hemodynamics, leading to changes in gastric mucosal histology and function and thereby weakening the mucosal defense barrier. However, no specific drug treatment plans are currently available. This article reviews the current literature to further our understanding of the mechanism underlying PHG and the relationship between PHG and the posterior mucosal defense barrier and to explore new therapeutic targets.

Placental growth factor levels neither reflect severity of portal hypertension nor portal-hypertensive gastropathy in patients with advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Experimental data indicates that placental growth factor (PLGF) is involved in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension (PH) due to advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). We investigated serum levels of PLGF and its "scavenger", the receptor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT1, or sVEGFR1), in ACLD patients with different severity of PH and portal-hypertensive gastropathy (PHG).

METHODS

PLGF and sVEGFR1 were measured in ACLD patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥6 mmHg (n = 241) and endoscopic evaluation of PHG (n = 216). Patients with pre-/posthepatic PH, TIPS, liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (13%) patients had HVPG 6-9 mmHg, 128 (53%) 10-19 mmHg and 81 (34%) ≥20 mmHg; 141 (59%) had decompensated ACLD (dACLD). PLGF (median 17.2 vs. 20.8 vs. 22.4 pg/mL; p = 0.002), sVEGFR1 (median 96.0 vs. 104.8 vs. 119.3 pg/mL; p < 0.001) levels increased across HVPG strata, while PLGF/sVEGFR1 ratios remained similar (0.19 vs. 0.20 vs. 0.18 pg/mL; p = 0.140). The correlation between PLGF and HVPG was weak (Rho = 0.190,95%CI 0.06-0.31; p = 0.003), and the PLGF/sVEGFR1 ratio did not correlate with HVPG (p = 0.331). The area-under-the-receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) for PLGF to detect clinically significant PH (CSPH;i.e. HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) yielded only 0.688 (0.60-0.78; p < 0.001). When compared to ACLD patients without PHG, PLGF levels (20 without vs. 21.4 with mild vs. 17.1 pg/mL with severe PHG, respectively; p = 0.005) and PLGF/sVEGFR1 ratios (0.20 vs. 0.19 vs. 0.17; p = 0.076) did not increase with mild and severe PHG.

CONCLUSION

While PLGF levels tended to increase with severity of PH, the PLGF/sVEGFR1 ratio remained stable across HVPG strata. Neither PLGF nor the PLGF/sVEGFR1 ratio had diagnostic value for prediction of CSPH. The severity of PHG was also not associated with stepwise increases in PLGF levels or PLGF/sVEGFR1 ratio.

Portal hypertensive vasculopathy - An entity worth remembering with non-neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions

Portal hypertensive vasculopathy (PHV) represents an increase in the pressure in the portal circulation. This increased pressure leads to changes in the mucosa that can be appreciated endoscopically as well as histopathologically. Lesions can be observed in the entire gastrointestinal tract (GIT) including stomach, duodenum, jejunum and colon. The histological changes are appreciated mainly in the mucosal and submucosal blood vessels. A knowledge of these lesions as well as the changes helps in separating them from other close differentials with specific treatment to be instituted. The pathogenesis of the hemodynamic changes is not well-understood. The underlying factor is increased portal pressure. Studies indicate, that besides increased portal pressure other factors in combination led to the observed changes. Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is seen in the gastric body and fundus, while varices are noted in the cardia and fundus. Changes may be seen in the small intestine and throughout the colon with anorectal varices. Histopathological changes include dilated, congested and ectatic capillaries and edema in the lamina propria besides a large spectrum of other histopathological changes. Mucosal capillaries with thick irregular wall show absence of red blood cells in the lumen. Thickening of the vessel wall serves as a better marker than the vascular diameter when portal hypertension (PHT) is considered. Long standing cases may show fibrosis in lamina propria. At times, these changes may lead to occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Important differentials need to be ruled out in all the cases as the treatment and the outcome of all differs. Endoscopically or histopathologically if the mucosal changes are observed they should not be overlooked and a detailed work-up must be carried out.

Portal hypertensive gastropathy: A systematic review of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history and therapy

AIM

To describe the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history, and therapy of portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) based on a systematic literature review.

METHODS

Computerized search of the literature was performed via PubMed using the following medical subject headings or keywords: "portal" and "gastropathy"; or "portal" and "hypertensive"; or "congestive" and "gastropathy"; or "congestive" and "gastroenteropathy". The following criteria were applied for study inclusion: Publication in peer-reviewed journals, and publication since 1980. Articles were independently evaluated by each author and selected for inclusion by consensus after discussion based on the following criteria: Well-designed, prospective trials; recent studies; large study populations; and study emphasis on PHG.

RESULTS

PHG is diagnosed by characteristic endoscopic findings of small polygonal areas of variable erythema surrounded by a pale, reticular border in a mosaic pattern in the gastric fundus/body in a patient with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Histologic findings include capillary and venule dilatation, congestion, and tortuosity, without vascular fibrin thrombi or inflammatory cells in gastric submucosa. PHG is differentiated from gastric antral vascular ectasia by a different endoscopic appearance. The etiology of PHG is inadequately understood. Portal hypertension is necessary but insufficient to develop PHG because many patients have portal hypertension without PHG. PHG increases in frequency with more severe portal hypertension, advanced liver disease, longer liver disease duration, presence of esophageal varices, and endoscopic variceal obliteration. PHG pathogenesis is related to a hyperdynamic circulation, induced by portal hypertension, characterized by increased intrahepatic resistance to flow, increased splanchnic flow, increased total gastric flow, and most likely decreased gastric mucosal flow. Gastric mucosa in PHG shows increased susceptibility to gastrotoxic chemicals and poor wound healing. Nitrous oxide, free radicals, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and glucagon may contribute to PHG development. Acute and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding are the only clinical complications. Bleeding is typically mild-to-moderate. Endoscopic therapy is rarely useful because the bleeding is typically diffuse. Acute bleeding is primarily treated with octreotide, often with concomitant proton pump inhibitor therapy, or secondarily treated with vasopressin or terlipressin. Nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, particularly propranolol, are used to prevent bleeding after an acute episode or for chronic bleeding. Iron deficiency anemia from chronic bleeding may require iron replacement therapy. Transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt and liver transplantation are highly successful ultimate therapies because they reduce the underlying portal hypertension.

CONCLUSION

PHG is important to recognize in patients with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension because it can cause acute or chronic GI bleeding that often requires pharmacologic therapy.

Hemodynamic changes in splanchnic blood vessels in portal hypertension

Portal hypertension (PHT) is associated with a hyperdynamic state characterized by a high cardiac output, increased total blood volume, and a decreased splanchnic vascular resistance. This splanchnic vasodilation is a result of an important increase in local and systemic vasodilators (nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, prostacyclin, endocannabinoids, and so on), the presence of a splanchnic vascular hyporesponsiveness toward vasoconstrictors, and the development of mesenteric angiogenesis. All these mechanisms will be discussed in this review. To decompress the portal circulation in PHT, portosystemic collaterals will develop. The presence of these portosystemic shunts are responsible for major complications of PHT, namely bleeding from gastrointestinal varices, encephalopathy, and sepsis. Until recently, it was accepted that the formation of collaterals was due to opening of preexisting vascular channels, however, recent data suggest also the role of vascular remodeling and angiogenesis. These points are also discussed in detail.

Reduction of ethanol-induced injury in portal hypertensive gastric mucosa of rats by induction of heat shock protein 72 by geranylgeranylacetone

Portal hypertensive (PHT) gastropathy has an increased susceptibility to damage due to noxious factors. Heat shock protein (HSP) 72 has a protective effect against gastric mucosal injury and geranylgeranylacetone (GGA) is an inducer of HSP 72. However, it remains unclear how HSP 72 influences the PHT gastric mucosa. The aim of the present study was to investigate HSP 72 induction by GGA and the protective effect to gastric mucosa in PHT rats. PHT rats were produced by staged portal vein occlusion, and GGA 200 mg/kg was orally administered. Expression of HSP 72 protein in the gastric mucosa was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and gastric mucosal damage against 70% ethanol (10 mL/kg) following GGA or vehicle treatment was also estimated. Expression of mucosal HSP 72 after vehicle administration was significantly higher in the PHT rats compared with the sham-operated rats. After GGA treatment, portal pressure did not change but HSP 72 was significantly increased in the gastric mucosa of both groups. Ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage was significantly decreased due to GGA treatment in the PHT rats, but not in the sham-operated rats. These findings suggest that HSP 72 expression is enhanced in PHT gastric mucosa and plays an important role in gastric mucosal protection. The induction of HSP 72 by GGA may therefore effectively prevent mucosal injury in the PHT stomach.

N/A

N/A

Expression of TNF-α and VEGF in the esophagus of portal hypertensive rats

AIM: To investigate the expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the development of esophageal varices in portal hypertensive rats.

METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats in the model group in which a two-stage ligation of portal vein plus ligation of the left adrenal vein was performed, were divided into three subgroups (M₇, M₁₄, and M₂₁) in which the rats were kiued on the seventh day, the 14^th d and the 21 d after the complete portal ligation. Thirty male SD rats, which underwent the sham operation in the control group, were also separated into three subgroups (C₇, C₁₄ and C₂₁) corresponding to the models. The expression of TNF-α and VEGF in the esophagus of all the six subgroups of rats were measured with immunohistochemical SP technique.

RESULTS: The portal pressure in the three model subgroups was significantly higher than that in the corresponding control subgroups (23.82±1.83 vs 11.61±0.86 cmH₂O, 20.90±3.27 vs 11.43±1.55 cmH₂O and 20.68±2.27 vs 11.87±0.79 cmH₂O respectively, P<0.01), as well as the number (9.3±1.6 vs 5.1±0.8, 11.1±0.8 vs 5.4±1.3 and 11.7±1.5 vs 5.2±1.1 respectively, P<0.01) and the total vascular area (78972.6±3527.8 vs 12993.5±4994.8 μm², 107207.5±46461.4 vs 11862.6±5423.2 μm² and 110241.4±49262.2 vs 11973.7±3968.5 μm² respectively, P<0.01) of submucosal veins in esophagus. Compared to the corresponding controls, the expression of TNF-α and VEGF in M₂₁ was significantly higher (2.23±0.30 vs 1.13±0.28 and 1.65±0.38 vs 0.56±0.30 for TNF-α and VEGF respectively, P <0.01), whereas there was no difference in M₇ (1.14±0.38 vs 1.06±0.27 and 0.67±0.35 vs 0.50±0.24 for TNF-α and VEGF respectively, P>0.05) and M₁₄ (1.20±0.25 vs 1.04±0.26 and 0.65±0.18 vs 0.53±0.25 for TNF-α and VEGF respectively, P>0.05). And the expression of TNF-α and VEGF in M₂₁ was significantly higher than that in M₇ (2.23±0.30 vs 1.14±0.38 and 1.65±0.38 vs 0.67±0.35 for TNF-α and VEGF respectively, P<0.01) and M₁₄ (2.23±0.30 vs 1.20±0.25 and 1.65±0.38 vs 0.65±0.18 for TNF-α and VEGF respectively, P<0.01), but there was no difference between M₇ and M₁₄ (1.14±0.38 vs 1.20±0.25 and 0.67±0.35 vs 0.65±0.18 for TNF-α and VEGF respectively, P >0.05).

CONCLUSION: In the development of esophageal varices in portal hypertensive rats, increased TNF-α and VEGF may be not an early event, and probably play a role in weakening the esophageal wall and the rupture of esophageal varices.

Anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibody prevents portal-systemic collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive mice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Portal hypertension is a frequent syndrome that develops in patients with chronic liver diseases, which are one of the most common causes of death in adults worldwide. The most serious clinical consequences of portal hypertension are related to the development of portal-systemic collateral vessels. Those include hepatic encephalopathy and massive bleeding from ruptured gastroesophageal varices. The high relevance of these collateral vessels prompted us to investigate the mechanism underlying its formation in a murine model of portal hypertension.

METHODS

To determine whether the development of portal-systemic collateral vessels in portal hypertension is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent angiogenic process, we assessed the effects of a monoclonal antibody against VEGF receptor-2 on the formation of these collateral vessels in mice with portal hypertension induced by partial portal vein ligation. We also studied the effects of a selective and specific inhibitor of VEGF receptor-2 autophosphorylation in partial portal vein-ligated rats.

RESULTS

A significant and marked inhibition in the formation of portal-systemic collateral vessels was observed in both partial portal vein-ligated mice and rats treated with anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibodies or with the inhibitor of VEGF receptor-2 autophosphorylation, respectively, compared with animals receiving control solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study shows that formation of collateral vessels is an angiogenesis-dependent process that can be markedly inhibited by blockade of the VEGF signaling pathway. These findings will make angiogenesis a focal point of research in portal hypertension and may lead to novel approaches for therapy of patients with chronic liver diseases.

Role of acute elevation of portal venous pressure by exogenous glucagon on gastric mucosal injury in rats with portal hypertension

Time-course studies revealed the increased susceptibility of the gastric mucosa to noxious injury in portal hypertension correlates with the level of elevated portal venous pressure and hyperglucagonemia. Whether acute elevation of portal venous pressure by exogenous glucagon aggravates such injury is not known. We tested the hypothesis that glucagon in a dose sufficient to acutely elevate portal venous pressure aggravates noxious injury of the gastric mucosa in rats with portal hypertension. Infusion of a portal hypotensive dose of somatostatin should reverse these changes. In anesthetized rats with portal vein ligation, glucagon, somatostatin or the combination was administered intravenously in a randomized, coded fashion. Acidified ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury was determined. Portal venous pressure and gastric mucosal perfusion and oxygenation (reflectance spectrophotometry) were monitored to confirm the effects of the respective intravenous treatments. Exogenous glucagon exacerbated acidified ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury. The exacerbation was attenuated by somatostatin. These changes paralleled the portal hypertensive and hypotensive effects of glucagon and somatostatin, respectively. Our data suggest that a unique mechanism is triggered with the onset of portal hypertension. In an antagonistic manner, glucagon and somatostatin modulate this novel mechanism that controls portal venous pressure and susceptibility of the gastric mucosa to noxious injury.

Comparison of the efficacy of octreotide, vasopressin, and omeprazole in the control of acute bleeding in patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy: a controlled study

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertensive gastropathy is an important complication of liver cirrhosis and it contributes to acute gastric bleeding. Effective management of this condition remains a clinical challenge. We assessed and compared the efficacy of octreotide, vasopressin, and omeprazole in the treatment of acute bleeding in patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy were randomized into Octreotide, Vasopressin, and Omeprazole groups. Bleeding was monitored by observing the contents of the nasogastric tube. Blood transfusion requirements and side-effects of drugs were recorded. Repeat endoscopies were scheduled 2 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Complete bleeding control after 48 h of drug infusion was achieved in all patients receiving octreotide (100%), 14/22 patients receiving vasopressin (64%), and 13/22 patients receiving Omeprazole (59%). Octreotide required much less time and significantly fewer blood transfusions to control bleeding. Patients receiving vasopressin experienced more side-effects than those receiving octreotide and omeprazole. In the 17 patients whose bleeding was not controlled within 48 h by either vasopressin or omeprazole, complete bleeding control was achieved by combined use of these two agents. Follow-up endoscopy showed dramatic improvement in gastric mucosal erosions, superficial ulceration and erythema.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide appeared to be more effective in controlling acute bleeding in patients with hypertensive gastropathy, with significantly rapid action, smaller transfusion requirements, and minor side-effects. Simultaneous administration of vasopressin and omeprazole appeared to have additive effects.

Gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy

Gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) are an important complication of both generalized and segmental portal hypertension. The natural history and risk factors for bleed from GV are not extensively studied as that for esophageal varices. Recently, effective therapy for gastric variceal bleed in form of tissue adhesives, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices (BRTO) has been developed. Further advances are still needed regarding natural history, risk factors, bleeding, and mechanism of GV rupture.