Effects of the AT1 antagonist HR 720 in comparison to losartan on stimulated sympathetic outflow, blood pressure, and heart rate in pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats

An update on non-peptide angiotensin receptor antagonists and related RAAS modulators

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) is an important regulator of blood pressure and fluid-electrolyte homeostasis. RAAS has been implicated in pathogenesis of hypertension, congestive heart failure, and chronic renal failure. Aliskiren is the first non-peptide orally active renin inhibitor approved by FDA. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors are associated with frequent side effects such as cough and angio-oedema. Recently, the role of ACE2 and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) in the formation of an important active metabolite/mediator of RAAS, ang 1-7, has initiated attempts towards development of ACE2 inhibitors and combined ACE/NEP inhibitors. Furukawa and colleagues developed a series of low molecular weight nonpeptide imidazole analogues that possess weak but selective, competitive AT1 receptor blocking property. Till date, many compounds have exhibited promising AT1 blocking activity which cause a more complete RAAS blockade than ACE inhibitors. Many have reached the market for alternative treatment of hypertension, heart failure and diabetic nephropathy in ACE inhibitor intolerant patients and still more are waiting in the queue. But, the hallmark of this area of drug research is marked by a progress in understanding molecular interaction of these blockers at the AT1 receptor and unraveling the enigmatic influence of AT2 receptors on growth/anti-growth, differentiation and the regeneration of neuronal tissue. Different modeling strategies are underway to develop tailor made molecules with the best of properties like Dual Action (Angiotensin And Endothelin) Receptor Antagonists (DARA), ACE/NEP inhibitors, triple inhibitors, AT2 agonists, AT1/TxA2 antagonists, balanced AT1/AT2 antagonists, and nonpeptide renin inhibitors. This abstract gives an overview of these various angiotensin receptor antagonists.

Peripheral sympatholytic actions of four AT1 antagonists: are they relevant for long-term antihypertensive efficacy?

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II causes hypertension not only by direct constriction of vascular smooth muscle, but also by facilitating the release of noradrenaline from sympathetic terminals and by enhancing vascular noradrenaline sensitivity. AT1 receptor antagonists attenuate all these actions, but display some evidence of substance-related selectivities.

OBJECTIVE

The contribution of pre- or postsynaptic impairment of sympathetic transmission to long-term antihypertensive efficacy should be determined for four structurally different, clinically approved AT1 antagonists.

DESIGN

Spontaneously hypertensive rats were treated with candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, or losartan via osmotic minipumps for 4 weeks at doses yielding identical reductions of blood pressure. Maximum efficacy was obtained with a tripled dose of candesartan.

METHODS

In the pithed rat model, stimulus/response dependencies were determined for vasopressor effectivity of preganglionic electrical stimulation, and of intravenous bolus applications of noradrenaline and angiotensin II.

RESULTS

Losartan, irbesartan, eprosartan, and candesartan at doses of 5, 40, 20, and 0.05 mg/kg per day, were equally effective in reducing basal systolic blood pressure (-42 mmHg), and the vasopressor potency of angiotensin II (approximately 10-fold). The efficacies of preganglionic stimulation and exogenous noradrenaline were unaltered, with the exception of irbesartan, which reduced vascular noradrenaline sensitivity. The tripled dose of candesartan further reduced basal and angiotensin II-stimulated blood pressures, and significantly attenuated vascular noradrenaline sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

AT1 antagonists at doses that effectively reduce blood pressure in chronic therapy do not generally suppress peripheral sympathetic function. A potential interaction consists in a reduction of vascular noradrenaline sensitivity, which can be considered as a class effect of AT1 antagonists at high dosage.

Beneficial effect of candesartan treatment on cardiac autonomic nervous activity in patients with chronic heart failure: simultaneous recording of ambulatory electrocardiogram and posture

BACKGROUND

Reclining in the right lateral decubitus position in chronic heart failure (CHF) is a self-protective mechanism for normalizing impaired cardiac autonomic nervous activity (CANA).

HYPOTHESIS

Candesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, exerts beneficial effects on CANA and postural preferences in patients with CHF.

METHODS

We studied 15 patients with CHF due to coronary artery disease. Cardiac autonomic nervous activity was assessed using spectral heart rate variability (HRV) analysis based on 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring before and after an 8-week treatment with candesartan. The patients' posture was simultaneously recorded using a specially devised detector, as the right (R) or left (L) lateral decubitus or supine (S) positions, to evaluate postural modulations of CANA. Normalized high-frequency (0.15 to 0.40 Hz) power (nHF) and the low-frequency (0.04 to 0.15 Hz)/high-frequency power ratio (LF/HF) were used as indices of vagal activity and sympathovagal balance, respectively.

RESULTS

When HRV was analyzed in each position, CANA was changed in L and S, but not in R, from sympathetic to parasympathetic prevalence by the treatment (R, nHF, 50 +/- 20 vs. 52 +/- 19 nu, p = 0.87; LF/HF, 1.39 +/- 1.11 vs. 1.32 +/- 1.32, p =0.93; L, nHF, 28 +/- 13 vs. 47 +/- 19 nu, p = 0.019; LF/HF, 3.34 +/- 2.48 vs. 1.56 +/- 1.39, p = 0.029; S, nHF, 38 +/- 17 vs. 53 +/- 16 nu, p = 0.0023; LF/HF, 2.43 +/- 2.21 vs. 1.03 +/- 0.59, p = 0.025). The fractions of the time in R and L were decreased and increased, respectively, by the treatment (R, 40 +/- 30 vs. 18 +/- 24%, p = 0.0018; L, 11 +/- 20 vs. 27 +/- 26%, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHF, candesartan treatment improves cardiac autonomic balance, and the preference for the right lateral decubitus position disappears after the treatment.

Pressor effects of electrical stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex in unanesthetized rats

The medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) is involved in central nervous system (CNS)-mediated cardiovascular modulation. We compared the cardiovascular effects of electrical stimulation (EE) of the MPFC in unanesthetized rats to those observed after stimulation of the same area in urethane-anesthetized rats. Electrical stimulation (35, 106, 177, 247, 318, and 389 microA rms/10 sec, 60-Hz sine wave) of the MPFC of urethane-anesthetized rats caused depressor responses of stimulus-related intensity. The cardiovascular response to electrical stimulation of the MPFC in unanesthetized rats was characterized by stimulus-related pressor responses. No significant heart rate changes were observed during the EE period in any case. The pressor response to electrical stimulation (106 microA rms/10 sec, 60-Hz sine wave) of the MPFC was not affected by intravenous pretreatment with the vasopressin antagonist dTyr(CH(2))(5)(Me)AVP (50 microg/kg, intravenously), by hypophysectomy, or by intravenous pretreatment with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan (1 mg/kg, intravenously). The pressor response was blocked by intravenous pretreatment with the ganglionic blocker mecamylamine (2 mg/kg, intravenously) but was not affected by adrenal demedullation, thus suggesting involvement of the neural component of the sympathetic nervous system without a major involvement of its hormonal component. Our results confirmed the occurrence of depressor responses after electrical stimulation of the MPFC in urethane-anesthetized rats and evidenced that only pressor responses are observed after its stimulation in unanesthetized rats. The fact that the pressor response to the stimulation of the MPFC was blocked by a ganglioplegic suggests that the MPFC has functional excitatory actions over the sympathetic nervous system.

Sympatho-inhibitory actions of irbesartan in pithed spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats

Angiotensin II (Ang II) can enhance sympathetic neurotransmission by acting on (AT1) receptors that are located on sympathetic nerve terminals. We investigated presynaptic blockade by the selective AT1-receptor antagonist irbesartan in pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). We compared the presynaptic inhibitory dose with that required for the blockade of AT1-receptors on vascular smooth muscle in both strains. To investigate blockade of presynaptic AT1-receptors, we studied the effect of irbesartan on the sequelae of electric stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar sympathetic outflow (0.25-8 Hz). To study the interaction between postsynaptic AT1-blockers and alpha-adrenoceptors, the effects of irbesartan on pressor responses to exogenous noradrenaline (NA) were established. Additionally, we studied the effect of irbesartan on dose-response curves for the vasoconstriction induced by exogenous Ang II. Pressor responses to electrical stimulation of thoracolumbar sympathetic neurones, to exogenous Ang II, as well as to (NA) were enhanced in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) compared with WKY. The stimulation-induced rise in DBP could be dose-dependently reduced by irbesartan (0.3-10 mg/kg) in both SHR and WKY. The pIC50 values (doses which suppress the rise in DBP by 50% compared with control) were 5.60 +/- 0.09 and 5.72 +/- 0.08 for SHR and WKY, respectively (P > 0.05). In SHR, no effect of irbesartan (3 mg/kg) on pressor responses to exogenous NA was observed. In contrast, in WKY, irbesartan (3 mg/kg) caused a rightward shift of the dose-response curve to exogenous NA. Irbesartan (0.3-3 mg/kg) caused a depression of E(max) values and a rightward shift of the dose-response curves to exogenous Ang II in a similar fashion in both SHR and WKY. From these results we conclude that both in SHR and in WKY, Ang II exerts a facilitatory effect on sympathetic neurotransmission, which is mediated by prejunctional AT1-receptors in both strains. Irbesartan displays comparable sympatho-inhibitory potency in the normotensive and hypertensive pithed rat preparations. A facilitatory effect via postsynaptically located AT1-receptors on alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated responses exists in WKY, but not in SHR. In both strains the required dose to inhibit presynaptic effects is somewhat higher than the dose required to inhibit postsynaptic effects. No differences, therefore, seem to exist between the two strains regarding the affinity of irbesartan for pre- and postjunctional AT1-receptors, respectively.

Angiotensin II induces catecholamine release by direct ganglionic excitation

Angiotensin II (ANG) is known to facilitate catecholamine release from peripheral sympathetic neurons by enhancing depolarization-dependent exocytosis. In addition, a direct excitation by ANG of peripheral sympathetic nerve activity has recently been described. This study determined the significance of the latter mechanism for angiotensin-induced catecholamine release in the pithed rat. Rats were anesthetized and instrumented for measuring either hemodynamics and renal sympathetic nerve activity or plasma catecholamine concentrations in response to successively increasing doses of angiotensin infusions. Even during ganglionic blockade by hexamethonium (20 mg/kg), angiotensin dose-dependently elevated sympathetic nerve activity, whereas blood pressure-equivalent doses of phenylephrine were ineffective. Independently of central nervous sympathetic activity and ganglionic transmission, angiotensin (0.1 to 1 microg/kg) also induced an up-to 27-fold increase in plasma norepinephrine levels, reaching 2.65 ng/mL. Preganglionic electrical stimulation (0.5 Hz) raised basal norepinephrine levels 11-fold and further enhanced the angiotensin-induced increase in norepinephrine (4.04 ng/mL at 1 microg/kg ANG). Stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine release were suppressed by candesartan (1 mg/kg) or tetrodotoxin (100 microg/kg), respectively. Angiotensin enhanced plasma norepinephrine, heart rate, and sympathetic nerve activity at similar threshold doses (0.3 to 1 microg/kg), but raised blood pressure at a significantly lower dose (0.01 microg/kg). It is concluded that direct stimulation of ganglionic angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptors arouses electrical activity in sympathetic neurons, leading to exocytotic junctional catecholamine release. In both the absence and presence of preganglionic sympathetic activity, this mechanism contributes significantly to ANG-induced enhancement of catecholamine release.

Involvement of the AT(2)-receptor in angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission

Angiotensin II (Ang II) causes facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission via prejunctionally-located AT(1)-receptors. The pithed rat is a suitable model to study the interactions between endogenously produced Ang II and the sympathetic nervous system at the peripheral level. Previously, we demonstrated that inhibition of the facilitatory actions of Ang II is a class effect of all AT(1)-receptor blockers (ARB). However, all ARBs caused less than maximal inhibition after the highest dose, thus causing a U-shaped dose-response curve with respect to sympatho-inhibition. In the present study, we investigated whether the AT(2)-receptor is involved in this upturn of the dose-response relationship. Accordingly, we studied the effect of the ARB, irbesartan (1 60 mg/kg), on the sequelae of electric stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar sympathetic outflow in the presence and absence of the AT(2)-blocker, PD 123319 (0.5 mg/kg +50 g/kg/min). Additionally, the effect of the combined (non- selective) AT(1)/AT(2)-receptor antagonist saralasin (0.001, 0.003, 0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg/min), on stimulation-induced responses was studied. In addition, we measured PRA-levels after administration of irbesartan, in this model. The stimulation-induced increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) could be dose-dependently reduced by irbesartan. Co-infusion with PD 123319 increased the sympatho-inhibitory potency of irbesartan, possibly through displacement of irbesartan from plasma protein binding sites. The U-shaped dose-response relationship observed with irbesartan, which is illustrative for other ARBs in this model, was not observed when PD 123319 was co-administered with irbesartan, nor with the non-selective AT(1)/AT(2)-blocker, saralasin. PRA-levels increased from 111.0+17.8 to 198.7+22.2 ng/ml/hour after administration of irbesartan. PRA-levels did not differ when measured after the three highest doses of irbesartan.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings indicate a facilitatory role for the AT(2)-receptor, which is unmasked by the highest dose of irbesartan. Different plasma Ang II-levels are unlikely to have caused the less than maximal inhibition after the highest dose of irbesartan.

Prejunctional and postjunctional inhibitory actions of eprosartan and candesartan in the isolated rabbit mesenteric artery

Effects of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists eprosartan and candesartan and AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 on Ang II-induced facilitation of noradrenergic neurotransmission were investigated in isolated rabbit mesenteric artery under isometric conditions. Sympathoinhibitory potency of AT1 blockers was compared with their potency concerning inhibition of direct vasoconstrictor effect of Ang II. To investigate blockade of presynaptic AT1 and AT2 receptors, effects of Ang II on electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contractions in presence or absence of eprosartan, candesartan, or PD123319 were studied. To investigate blockade of postsynaptic AT1 receptors, effects of either eprosartan or candesartan on concentration-response curves of Ang II were studied. In addition, effect of Ang II on postsynaptic alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated responses was studied using noradrenaline. EFS (1, 2, and 4 Hz) caused an increase of contractile force. At stimulation frequencies of 1, 2, and 4 Hz, a subpressor concentration of Ang II (0.5 nM) increased stimulation-induced vasoconstrictor responses by 2.8 +/- 0.5, 2.4 +/- 0.4, and 1.6 +/- 0.1 of control values, respectively (p < 0.05 compared with control for all frequencies). The enhancement could be antagonized by eprosartan (1 nM-0.1 microM) and candesartan (1 nM-0.1 microM). The AT2 antagonist PD123319 (10 nM) did not influence Ang II-induced facilitation of stimulation-induced contractions. Contractile responses to exogenous noradrenaline were unaltered in presence of Ang II 0.5 nM. Ang II (1 nM-0.3 microM) caused a concentration-dependent increase in contractile force, which could be antagonized by eprosartan (pD2; 8.8 +/- 0.19) and candesartan (pD2; 11.3 +/- 0.23). Thus, the facilitating effect of Ang II on noradrenergic neurotransmission is mediated by presynaptically located AT1 receptors and not by AT2 receptors. For eprosartan, sympathoinhibition was achieved at concentrations that also block AT1 receptors on vascular smooth muscle. In contrast, for candesartan, presynaptic inhibitory concentrations were considerably higher than those required for postsynaptic inhibition.

Comparison of the vascular and antiadrenergic activities of four angiotensin II type 1 antagonists in the pithed rat

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II is known to facilitate the release of catecholamines from peripheral sympathetic neurons by stimulating presynaptically located receptors. Although inhibitor studies have revealed these to be angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors, they do in fact appear to display peculiar susceptibilities to various AT1 receptor antagonists, which might correspond to different neuronal and vascular receptor subtypes.

OBJECTIVE

A direct comparison of the pre- and postsynaptic potencies of four AT1 antagonists was performed to characterize these receptors further.

DESIGN

We studied angiotensin II-induced catecholamine release and vasoconstriction in pithed, spontaneously hypertensive rats under the influence of candesartan, eprosartan, EXP 3174, and irbesartan. The effect of AT1 blockade on postsynaptic vascular sensitivity to noradrenaline (NA) was also determined.

METHODS

Pithed rats received repeated intravenous applications of either angiotensin II or NA, preceded by cumulatively increasing doses of the AT1 antagonists. Vasoconstriction and catecholamine release were quantified by the measurement of acute increases in blood pressure and plasma NA, respectively.

RESULTS

All AT1 antagonists dose-dependently suppressed angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction and release of NA. Although the antagonists differed greatly in their inhibitory potencies (ID50 range 7-445 microg/kg), each displayed a similar potency at both neuronal and vascular angiotensin receptors. In a higher dose range, all AT1 antagonists attenuated the blood pressure increase in response to NA by up to 70%. The order of potencies for all inhibitory effects was: candesartan > eprosartan > EXP 3174 > irbesartan.

CONCLUSION

The AT1 antagonists tested do not discriminate between presynaptic neuronal and postsynaptic vascular angiotensin II receptors - a fact that refutes the existence of tissue-specific AT1 receptor subtypes. A marked reduction in vascular sensitivity to NA may contribute to the antihypertensive and cardioprotective mechanisms of AT1 antagonists.

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition increases cardiac catecholamine content and reduces monoamine oxidase activity via an angiotensin type 1 receptor-mediated mechanism

Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are well established and have usually been attributed to the inhibition of angiotensin II (ANG)-mediated effects at vascular or ventricular (angiotensin type 1) AT(1) receptors. One other important mechanism involves ANG-induced interactions with the sympathetic nervous system, which might include alterations of cardiac catecholamine concentrations during ACE inhibition due to a modulation of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity. Tissue catecholamines were studied in spontaneously hypertensive rats that were long-term treated with captopril (50 or 0.5 mg/kg/day), enalapril (10 or 0.1 mg/kg/day), an AT(1) receptor antagonist (candesartan-cilexetil, 3 mg/kg/day), or a calcium antagonist (mibefradil, 18 mg/kg/day). The kinetic parameters of MAO were then determined in vitro in the presence of ANG, captopril, enalaprilat, or candesartan. Noradrenaline and adrenaline contents were doubled in the left ventricle by captopril, enalapril, or candesartan independently of hypotensive potency but not in liver or cortex. In parallel, cardiac MAO activity was reduced by all doses of captopril (49/29%), enalapril (52/24%), or candesartan (38%). Mibefradil, which does not interact with the renin-angiotensin system, did not alter cardiac catecholamines or MAO activity when an equipotent antihypertensive dose was applied. In vitro MAO activity was not influenced by ANG, enalaprilat, or captopril at concentrations of up to 1 mM. It is concluded that diminished AT(1) receptor stimulation decreases cardiac MAO activity, probably by regulating MAO expression, since ANG, ACE inhibitors, and AT(1) antagonists had no effect on MAO activity in vitro. This action contributes to an increase in cardiac catecholamine content that may improve cardiac sympathetic control during therapy.

Mechanisms involved in the water intake-related pressor response in the rat

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to characterize and clarify the mechanisms involved in the acute blood pressure increase observed concomitantly with water intake in moderately dehydrated rats.

DESIGN

Short-term water deprivation was employed as a model to induce controlled water intake to study concomitant cardiovascular responses in the rat.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats were deprived of water for 18-24 h before the experiments and were allowed to drink for 20 s periods during the experimental session. During these periods water intake was accompanied by steady arterial pressure increases. This pressor response was unaffected by topical anesthesia of the oral cavity. Direct administration of water into the stomach did not cause pressor responses. The pressor response was not affected by bilateral adrenal demedullation or by pretreatment with diazepam, homatropine methyl bromide, d(CH2)5 Tyr(Me)AVP, losartan or RX821002. The pressor response was significantly reduced by ganglionic blockade with mecamylamine or pretreatment with the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that: (1) short-term dehydration can be used as a model to study cardiovascular responses associated with water intake in rats; and (2) the sympathetic nervous system and vascular smooth muscle alpha1-adrenoceptors are involved in the pressor response to water intake by dehydrated rats.

Inhibition of facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission and angiotensin II-induced pressor effects in the pithed rat: comparison between valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan

BACKGROUND

In the pithed rat model, endogenously generated angiotensin (Ang) II can enhance sympathetic neurotransmission by acting on Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptors that are located on sympathetic nerve terminals.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the inhibitory potency of candesartan, valsartan, eprosartan and embusartan in blocking presynaptically and postsynaptically located AT1 receptors.

DESIGN

To investigate blockade of presynaptic AT1 receptors, we studied the effect of AT1 receptor blockade on the sequelae of electrical stimulation of the thoracolumbar sympathetic outflow (0.25-8 Hz). To investigate the interaction between postsynaptic AT1 blockers and alpha-adrenoceptors, the effects of these compounds on pressor responses to exogenous noradrenaline were determined. To investigate blockade of postsynaptic AT1 receptors, we studied the effect of the AT1 antagonists on dose-response curves elicited by exogenous Ang II.

RESULTS

The stimulation-induced increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the Ang II-elicited DBP response were dose-dependently reduced by all AT1 receptor blockers. Interestingly, the greatest doses of the AT1 antagonists caused less than maximal reduction in the stimulation-induced increase in DBP, resulting in a U-shaped dose-response relationship. To compare sympathoinhibitory potencies, the doses that, at 2 Hz, reduced the change in DBP by 20 mmHg (ED20 values, expressed as -log mol/kg) were calculated; they were 5.50 +/- 0.12, 5.77 +/- 0.10, 6.32 +/- 0.12 and 5.62 +/- 0.13 for valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan, respectively. The order of potency, therefore, was eprosartan> valsartan = candesartan = embusartan (where > signifies P < 0.05). To compare the order of potency for inhibition of the Ang II-induced increase in DBP, we calculated pA2 values (the X intercept in Schild regression). They were 7.20 +/- 0.17, 8.01 +/- 0.01, 7.20 +/- 0.03 and 7.25 +/- 0.16, for valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan, respectively. Accordingly, the order of potency for inhibition of the direct pressor effects of Ang II was candesartan> valsartan = eprosartan = embusartan (where > signifies P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the pithed rat, the effects on DBP of stimulation of the thoracolumbar spinal cord are partly dependent on endogenously formed Ang II. These effects can be counteracted by blockade of presynaptically located AT1 receptors. No interaction was found between postsynaptically located AT1 receptors and alpha-adrenoceptors. The order of potency of the agents tested for sympathoinhibition clearly differed from that for inhibition of the direct pressor effects of Ang II. These findings suggest considerable differences in affinity of the various AT1 blockers for pre- and postsynaptic AT1 receptors.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1-receptor antagonist restore nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and neuronal NOS expression in the adrenal glands of spontaneously hypertensive rats

During development of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, the activity of adrenal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) was investigated. SHR and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were studied at different ages: 3-4, 7-8 and 12-13 weeks after birth. Basal NOS activity was measured by the ability of homogenate to convert [3H]-L-arginine to [3H]-L-citrulline. At all ages, SHR rats exhibited 50-60% reduction in NOS activity when compared to age-matched WKY rats. In a following study, SHR rats (12-13 weeks) were treated chronically with the angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) captopril or enalapril, or the AT1-receptor antagonist losartan (2 x 25, 10 and 60 mg/kg per day for 10 days, respectively). The total NOS activity and protein expression of NOS isoenzymes from adrenals were determined. The basal NOS activity and protein expression of neuronal NOS (nNOS) was significantly increased in treated SHR rats when compared to control rats. The isoforms endothelial NOS and inducible NOS were undetectable. We conclude that impaired NO synthesis in the adrenal glands of SHR rats may contribute to the onset and maintenance of hypertension. The upregulation of nNOS protein in the adrenal glands may be one of the mechanisms by which ACE inhibitors and AT1-receptor antagonists by restoring the NO synthesis, mediate their antihypertensive effects.

Inhibition of angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission in the pithed rat: a comparison between losartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, and captopril

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have shown that angiotensin II enhances sympathetic nervous transmission. The objective of the present study was to quantify the inhibitory effect of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers losartan, irbesartan and telmisartan and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril on sympathetic neurotransmission and to compare the potency of these agents both at the presynaptic and the postsynaptic levels.

DESIGN

In the male, normotensive pithed rat model, we studied the effect of losartan (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), irbesartan (3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg), telmisartan (0.3, 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) and captopril (1.5, 5, 15 and 45 mg/kg) on electrical stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar spinal cord. To investigate the interaction between postsynaptic AT1-receptors and alpha-adrenoceptors, the effects of these compounds on pressor responses to exogenous noradrenaline were studied.

RESULTS

Stimulation of the thoracolumbar spinal cord caused a stimulation-frequency dependent rise in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that could be dose-dependently reduced by both AT1 receptor blockade and ACE inhibition. Interestingly, the highest doses of the AT1 antagonists caused less than maximal reduction in the rise in DBP. This phenomenon was not observed after ACE inhibition by captopril. In experiments with exogenous noradrenaline, no effect of AT1 blockade or ACE inhibition on alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated blood pressure responses was seen.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, in the pithed rat model, the effects of stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar spinal cord on DBP are counteracted by blockade of presynaptically located AT1 receptors. The order of potency concerning sympatico-inhibition is telmisartan > losartan > irbesartan. Regarding the inhibition of angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission, marked differences were observed between selective AT1 blockade and ACE inhibition. The finding that all three AT1 blockers cause less than maximal inhibition in their highest doses, as opposed to captopril, suggests that this is a class effect of the AT1 antagonists.