Effect of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber hemoperfusion on sepsis-induced rhabdomyolysis with acute renal failure

Blood Purification for Adult Patients With Severe Infection or Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive and updated systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the outcome benefits of various blood purification modalities for adult patients with severe infection or sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a search of PubMed, MEDLINE, clinical trial registries, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases with no language restrictions.

STUDY SELECTION

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes were the length of mechanical ventilation (MV) days and ICU stay, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and kidney replacement therapy requirement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included a total of 60 RCTs with 4,595 participants, comparing 16 blood purification modalities with 17 interventions. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion (relative risk [RR]: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86) and plasma exchange (RR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) were associated with low mortality (very low and low certainty of evidence, respectively). Because of the presence of high clinical heterogeneity and intransitivity, the potential benefit of polymyxin-B hemoperfusion remained inconclusive. The analysis of secondary outcomes was limited by the scarcity of available studies. HA330 with high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), HA330, and standard-volume CVVH were associated with shorter ICU stay. HA330 with high-volume CVVH, HA330, and standard-volume CVVH were beneficial in reducing MV days. None of the interventions showed a significant reduction in the incidence of AKI or the need for kidney replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our NMA suggests that plasma exchange and polymyxin-B hemoperfusion may provide potential benefits for adult patients with severe infection or sepsis/septic shock when compared with standard care alone, but most comparisons were based on low or very low certainty evidence. The therapeutic effect of polymyxin-B hemoperfusion remains uncertain. Further RCTs are required to identify the specific patient population that may benefit from extracorporeal blood purification.

The efficacy of renal replacement therapy strategies for septic-acute kidney injury: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is the main treatment for patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SAKI). However, the choice of RRT strategy remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effectiveness of RRT variants in SAKI patients by a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study searched the literature in the PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library databases up to August 18, 2018. The outcomes of the analysis were the survival rate, renal recovery rate, intensive care unit (ICU) duration, and hospital duration.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles were included in the analysis. The results showed that only the negative control was inferior to the regimens of RRT with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber (PMXF), PMXF alone, continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), CVVH plus alkaline phosphatase (AP), continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), high-volume CVVH, and extra high-volume CVVH in terms of the survival rate. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking , RRT with PMXF (84.4%) and PMXF (84.3%) were the treatments most likely to improve the survival rate among SAKI patients, followed by CVVH plus AP (69%). Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), extra high-volume CVVHDF, intermittent venovenous hemodiafiltration (IVVHDF), and low-volume CVVHDF resulted in very similar survival rates. CVVH plus AP conferred relative advantages in the renal recovery rate and ICU duration.

CONCLUSION

CVVH, CVVHD, and their derived RRT strategies can improve survival rates in SAKI patients, but there is no significant difference among the RRT strategies. There was also no significant difference in the survival rate among CVVHDF, IVVHDF, and their derived strategies. More high-quality randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed for further research.

Polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion and mortality in critically ill adult patients with sepsis/septic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

PURPOSE

Polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) is an adjuvant therapy for sepsis or septic shock that clears circulating endotoxin. Prior trials have shown that PMX-HP improves surrogate endpoints. We aimed to conduct an evidence synthesis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PMX-HP in critically ill adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Health Technology Assessment Database, CINAHL, "Igaku Chuo Zasshi", the National Institute of Health Clinical Trials Register, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, the reference lists of retrieved articles, and publications by manufacturers of PMX-HP. The primary outcomes were 28-day all-cause mortality, the number of patients with at least one serious adverse event, and organ dysfunction scores. The GRADE methodology for the certainty of evidence was used.

RESULTS

Six trials (857 participants; weighted mean age 62.5 years) proved eligible. Patient-oriented primary outcomes were assessed. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for 28-day mortality associated with PMX-HP was 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.36; I ² = 25%; n = 797]. The pooled RR for adverse events was 2.17 (95% CI 0.68-6.94; I ² = 0%; n = 717). Organ dysfunction scores over 24-72 h after PMX-HP treatment did not change significantly (standardized mean difference - 0.26; 95% CI - 0.64 to 0.12; I ² = 78%; n = 797). The certainty of the body of evidence was judged as low for both benefit and harm using the GRADE methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to support the routine use of PMX-HP to treat patients with sepsis or septic shock.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42016038356).

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for rhabdomyolysis

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyolysis is a condition that is characterised by the breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue and leakage of intracellular myocyte contents into circulating blood. Rhabdomyolysis can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) and is a potentially life-threatening condition. Studies have indicated that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may provide benefits for people with rhabdomyolysis by removing potentially damaging myoglobin and stabilising haemodynamic and metabolic status.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to: i) assess the efficacy of CRRT in removing myoglobin; ii) investigate the influence of CRRT on mortality and kidney-related outcomes; and iii) evaluate the safety of CRRT for the treatment of people with rhabdomyolysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 6 January 2014 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. We also searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from 1 January 1979 to 16 April 2013) and the Chinese Clinical Trials Register (to 16 April 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that investigated clinical outcomes of CRRT for people with rhabdomyolysis were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. We derived risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the three included studies (101 participants), one evaluated continuous arteriovenous haemodialysis and two investigated continuous venovenous haemofiltration; all included conventional therapy as control.We found significant decreases in myoglobin in patients among whom CRRT therapy was initiated on days four, eight, and 10 (day 4: MD -11.00 (μg/L), 95% CI -20.65 to -1.35; Day 8: MD -23.00 (μg/L), 95% CI -30.92 to -15.08; day 10: MD -341.87 (μg/L), 95% CI -626.15 to -57.59) compared with those who underwent conventional therapy.Although CRRT was associated with improved serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium levels; reduced duration of the oliguria phase; and was associated with reduced time in hospital, no significant differences were found in mortality rates compared with conventional therapy (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.37). The included studies did not report on long-term outcomes or prevention of AKI.Overall, we found that study quality was suboptimal: blinding and randomisation allocation were not reported by any of the included studies, leading to the possibility of selection, performance and detection bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although CRRT may provide some benefits for people with rhabdomyolysis, the poor methodological quality of the included studies and lack of data relating to clinically important outcomes limited our findings about the effectiveness of CRRT for people with rhabdomyolysis.There was insufficient evidence to discern any likely benefits of CRRT over conventional therapy for people with rhabdomyolysis and prevention of rhabdomyolysis-induced AKI.