Mixed chimerism of erythro- and megakaryopoiesis following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Natural Barcodes for Longitudinal Single Cell Tracking of Leukemic and Immune Cell Dynamics

Blood malignancies provide unique opportunities for longitudinal tracking of disease evolution following therapeutic bottlenecks and for the monitoring of changes in anti-tumor immunity. The expanding development of multi-modal single-cell sequencing technologies affords newer platforms to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these processes at unprecedented resolution. Furthermore, the identification of molecular events that can serve as in-vivo barcodes now facilitate the tracking of the trajectories of malignant and of immune cell populations over time within primary human samples, as these permit unambiguous identification of the clonal lineage of cell populations within heterogeneous phenotypes. Here, we provide an overview of the potential for chromosomal copy number changes, somatic nuclear and mitochondrial DNA mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and T and B cell receptor sequences to serve as personal natural barcodes and review technical implementations in single-cell analysis workflows. Applications of these methodologies include the study of acquired therapeutic resistance and the dissection of donor- and host cellular interactions in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: report from the Committee on Disease-Specific Methods and Strategies for Monitoring Relapse following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Part I: Methods, acute leukemias, and myelodysplastic syndromes

Relapse has become the major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Outcome of patients with clinical relapse after transplantation generally remains poor, but intervention prior to florid relapse improves outcome for certain hematologic malignancies. To detect early relapse or minimal residual disease, sensitive methods such as molecular genetics, tumor-specific molecular primers, fluorescein in situ hybridization, and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) are commonly used after allogeneic stem cell transplantation to monitor patients, but not all of them are included in the commonly employed disease-specific response criteria. The highest sensitivity and specificity can be achieved by molecular monitoring of tumor- or patient-specific markers measured by polymerase chain reaction-based techniques, but not all diseases have such targets for monitoring. Similar high sensitivity can be achieved by determination of donor chimerism, but its specificity regarding detection of relapse is low and differs substantially among diseases. Here, we summarize the current knowledge about the utilization of such sensitive monitoring techniques based on tumor-specific markers and donor cell chimerism and how these methods might augment the standard definitions of posttransplant remission, persistence, progression, relapse, and the prediction of relapse. Critically important is the need for standardization of the different residual disease techniques and to assess the clinical relevance of minimal residual disease and chimerism surveillance in individual diseases, which in turn, must be followed by studies to assess the potential impact of specific interventional strategies.

Mixed chimerism in SCT: conflict or peaceful coexistence?

Stem cell transplants that follow both myeloablative and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens can result in states of mixed chimerism, which can be stable over time. With widespread availability of Y chromosome FISH in sex-mismatched transplantation and DNA-based methodologies for analysis of chimerism in other donor-recipient pairs, further insights have been gained regarding the implications of the mixed chimeric state. In transplants performed for inherited and acquired marrow failure disorders, disease status can be improved with only 10-20% donor cells, and it appears that stable mixed chimerism at that level is an acceptable outcome often leading to a state of tolerance, but an increasing level of recipient cells often precedes graft rejection. In transplants performed for malignant conditions, increasing levels of mixed chimerism may indicate disease relapse, but some cases with stable levels of mixed chimerism have been compatible with prolonged remission states. Understanding when mixed chimerism is an indication of secondary graft failure or impending graft rejection vs a state of tolerance and ongoing propensity for the establishment of a graft-vs-tumor effect is often difficult with currently available technologies and immunologic assays. The ability to understand the implication of mixed chimerism of multiple cell lineages and of varied lymphocyte subsets will remain important areas for future research to best harness the immunologic and other therapeutic benefits of allogeneic transplantation.

Morphology of the bone marrow after stem cell transplantation

In many haematological conditions the only curative option is stem cell (SCT) or bone marrow (BM) transplantation. Little information exists about BM morphology following non-ablative engraftment. During the pretransplantation period and depending on the kind of pretreatment, there may be hypoplasia, residual disease and varying degrees of fibrosis. In the post-transplantation period, after 1-3 weeks of transfusion-dependent pancytopenia, the first signs of successful engraftment are indicated by the recurrence of neutrophils, monocytes and erythrocytes in the peripheral blood. In the BM there is slow regeneration of erythropoiesis, followed by the other lineages of haematopoiesis and increase in reticulin fibres or even a resolution of fibrosis. Diagnostic problems arise when neoplastic lympho- or haematopoiesis are maintained following transplantation. Moreover, there may be a significant graft versus tumour response reaction or an already relapsing disease needing aggressive treatment. On the other hand, a conspicuous dyshaematopoiesis should not be mistaken as representing a myelodysplastic syndrome. The presence of granulomas being treatment-related or a manifestation of intercurrent granulomatous disease has to be considered. More advanced knowledge of the histological features of regenerating BM will certainly aid the recognition of relapsing disease and is needed for the adequate reporting of post-transplant alterations associated with a successful or failing engraftment.

Kinetics of dendritic cell chimerism and T cell chimerism in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients

Dendritic cells (DC) as potent antigen-presenting cells (APC) and T cells as effector cells play an essential role in the pathophysiology of both graft-versus-host (GvH) and graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) reactions after transplantation. Therefore, we determined the kinetics of DC and T-cell chimerism establishment after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in a group of 144 patients, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) or magnetic cell sorting (MACS) followed by FISH or STR-PCR analysis for chimerism evaluation. In all, three cell lines investigated (CD3(+) T cells, CD11c(+) DC1 and CD123(+) DC2), we found a rapid and consistent establishment of complete donor chimerism (CDC) in over 70% of all patients during the first 6 weeks after AHCT. The rate of patients with CDC increased significantly over time within the first year after transplantation. A related donor (P=0.004) as well as an underlying lymphatic leukemia (P=0.03) were found to be significantly associated with development of MC in T cells. No significant correlation between DC or T cell chimerism and GvHD or relapse was detected. Our results thus demonstrate a fast and stable CDC in DC1, DC2 and T cells after AHCT that continuously increases over time in nearly all patients.

How and when should we monitor chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation?

SUMMARY

Chimerism analysis has become an important tool for the peri-transplant surveillance of engraftment. It offers the possibility to realize impending graft rejection and can serve as an indicator for the recurrence of the underlying malignant or nonmalignant disease. Most recently, these investigations have become the basis for treatment intervention, for example, to avoid graft rejection, to maintain engraftment and to treat imminent relapse by pre-emptive immunotherapy. This invited review focuses on the clinical implications of characterization of hematopoietic chimerism in stem cell transplantation.