Orthopaedic injuries following falls by hospital in-patients

Immediate Postoperative Zolpidem Use Increases Risk of Falls and Implant Complication Rates Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Analysis

BACKGROUND

Zolpidem is the most widely used hypnotic in the United States and has known side effects. However, the morbidity of zolpidem use following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well-defined. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effects that zolpidem use has on medical and implant complications, falls, lengths of stay, and medical utilizations following THA.

METHODS

A retrospective query of a nationwide insurance claims database was conducted from 2010 to 2020. All cases of THA and hypnotic use were identified using procedural and national drug codes. Patients who were prescribed zolpidem within 90 days of surgery were matched to hypnotic naive patients 1:5 based on demographic and comorbidity profiles. The 90-day medical complications, falls, fragility fractures, costs, and readmission rates, as well as 2-year implant complications were compared between cohorts. A total of 50,328 zolpidem patients were matched to 251,286 hypnotic naive patients.

RESULTS

The zolpidem group had significantly higher rates of medical complications, falls, and fragility fractures when compared to the hypnotic-naive group. The zolpidem group had significantly higher rates of dislocation, mechanical loosening, and periprosthetic fracture. Likewise, healthcare utilization was significantly greater in the zolpidem group.

CONCLUSION

Zolpidem use following THA is associated with significant risk of medical and implant complications, as well as fall risks, increased costs, lengths of stay, and readmissions. The findings of this study may affect discussions between orthopaedic surgeons and their patients on the benefits of sleep quality in their recovery versus the incurred risks of zolpidem use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective case-control study.

In-Hospital Hip Fractures in a Large Irish Teaching Hospital: Patient Risk Factors and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In-hospital hip fractures follow falls during unrelated admissions. Little data in the Irish setting is available on this vulnerable subset of hip fracture patients. Our objective is to review the incidence of in-hospital hip fractures, identify risk factors, and evaluate outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational review. We collected patient data in St. James' Hospital using the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry database and Electronic Patient Records for in-hospital hip fractures between 10/02/2017 and 22/04/2020. Comorbidity, survival, and discharge destination data were gathered.

RESULTS

We identified 40 fractures, representing 11.5% of all hip fractures treated at our center during the study period. The patients were 60-95 years old. Median age was 77 years for males and 86 years for females. Most (72.5%) were identified as fall risks, and 52% were unwitnessed falls. Many had a history of falls (67.5%), dementia (52.5%), or both (42.5%). Delirium was common (42.5%), and 75% had at least one vascular/coagulation disorder. Mortality was 10.25% at 30 days, 23.1% at 90 days, and 51.4% at 12 months. Although 70% were admitted from home, only 10% were discharged back home. 30% were admitted to a nursing home, and 55% were discharged from a nursing home.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital hip fractures accounted for 11.5% of all hip fractures treated at our center, confirming the need for a well-defined hospital protocol. Patients often present with previous falls, dementia, and cardiovascular disease. Outcomes are poor, with 51.4% mortality at 12 months and significant morbidity reflected by a loss of independent living.

Inpatient Falls and Orthopaedic Injuries in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From a Falls Register

Background Hospital inpatient falls have been a major area of concern in the healthcare setting. This poses a multifaceted challenge to healthcare systems, as elderly patients are at increased risk of harm and significant morbidity secondary to inpatient falls. In addition, hospital admission increases the risk of falls in acutely unwell elderly patients. There remains little consensus on best practices in reducing inpatient falls. With this, lies the risk to life or quality of life to this cohort of patients. Moreover, it is not evident whether orthopaedic injuries sustained by elderly patients in hospital and their management, including rehabilitation, has evolved with time. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort analysis of all inpatient falls over a three-year period in a single UK District General Hospital. A total of 101,183 acute admissions were analysed. All falls were identified and categorised into harm categories according to National Patient Safety Alerts. Patients sustaining moderate harm or more were assessed to determine injuries sustained, patient-associated factors, factors surrounding the fall, management incurred, length of stay, and financial burden incurred. Results A total of 101,183 admissions were analysed revealing a total of 2,453 in-patient falls. The rate of inpatient falls was 2.42%. Of these, 49 (1.98%) patients sustained moderate harm or more. Patient-related factors included age and comorbidities; 82% of patients were above the age of 75, and 78% of patients had three or more medical comorbidities. Fall-related factors leading to moderate harm or more included time of fall and ward. Most falls occurred out of hours (80%) and in acute medical wards (69%). The average length of stay following fall was 2.4 weeks per patient and a combined 110 weeks in the three-year period. In non-deceased patients, increased dependency and reduced mobility at discharge were noted. The total hospital annual financial burden due to moderate harm or more following an inpatient fall was approximately £123,490.00. Length of stay was the major contributor to this (£90,090.00 annually). Conclusions Inpatient falls remain a considerable patient safety issue, with orthopaedic injuries playing a central role in harm to patients following these falls. These also pose considerable service and financial costs to healthcare organisations. Further work is needed to identify best practices in in-hospital fall prevention and streamlining post-fall management and rehabilitation.

Association between Nurse Staffing and In-Hospital Bone Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if sufficient nurse staffing reduced in-hospital fractures in acute care hospitals.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

The Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient (DPC) database from July 2010 to March 2014 linked with the Surveys for Medical Institutions.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the association of inpatient nurse-to-occupied bed ratio (NBR) with in-hospital fractures. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was performed, adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital characteristics.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

We identified 770,373 patients aged 50 years or older who underwent planned major surgery for some forms of cancer or cardiovascular diseases. We used ICD-10 codes and postoperative procedure codes to identify patients with in-hospital fractures. Hospital characteristics were obtained from the "Survey of Medical Institutions and Hospital Report" and "Annual Report for Functions of Medical Institutions."

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Overall, 662 (0.09 percent) in-hospital fractures were identified. Logistic regression analysis showed that the proportion of in-hospital fractures in the group with the highest NBR was significantly lower than that in the group with the lowest NBR (adjusted odd ratios, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.44-0.99; p = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient nurse staffing may be important to reduce postsurgical in-hospital fractures in acute care hospitals.

Decreased risk of knee buckling with adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Femoral nerve (FNB) and adductor canal blocks (ACB) are used in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but neither has been demonstrated to be clearly superior. Although dynamometer studies have shown ACBs spare perioperative quadriceps function when compared to FNBs, ACBs have been widely adopted in orthopaedic surgery without significant evidence that they decrease the risk of perioperative falls.

Methods

All patients who received single-shot FNB (129 patients) or ACB (150 patients) at our institution for unilateral primary TKA from April 2014 to September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed for perioperative falls or near-falls during physical therapy and inpatient care.

Results

There were significantly more “near-falls” with documented episodes of knee buckling in the FNB group (17 vs 3, P = .0004). These patients’ first buckling episode occurred at an average of 21.1 hours postoperatively (standard deviation 5.83, range 13.83-41.15). There were no significant differences in pain scores between the 2 groups at any of the time periods measured; however, patients in the FNB group consumed significantly fewer opioids on postoperative day 1 than the ACB group (59 morphine equivalents vs 73, P = .004).

Conclusions

A significantly higher rate of near-falls with knee buckling during in-hospital physical therapy was discovered in the FNB group. With increasing numbers of TKAs being performed on a “fast-track” discharge model, these results must be seriously considered, particularly in patients planning to go home the same day, to reduce the risk of postoperative falls. These data support the recent clinical data trend favoring ACB over FNB in orthopaedic surgery.

The economic burden of nurse-sensitive adverse events in 22 medical-surgical units: retrospective and matching analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the economic burden of nurse-sensitive adverse events in 22 acute-care units in Quebec by estimating excess hospital-related costs and calculating resulting additional hospital days.

BACKGROUND

Recent changes in the worldwide economic and financial contexts have made the cost of patient safety a topical issue. Yet, our knowledge about the economic burden of safety of nursing care is quite limited in Canada in general and Quebec in particular.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of charts of 2699 patients hospitalized between July 2008 - August 2009 for at least 2 days of 30-day periods in 22 medical-surgical units in 11 hospitals in Quebec.

METHODS

Data were collected from September 2009 to August 2010. Nurse-sensitive adverse events analysed were pressure ulcers, falls, medication administration errors, pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Descriptive statistics identified numbers of cases for each nurse-sensitive adverse event. A literature analysis was used to estimate excess median hospital-related costs of treatments with these nurse-sensitive adverse events. Costs were calculated in 2014 Canadian dollars. Additional hospital days were estimated by comparing lengths of stay of patients with nurse-sensitive adverse events with those of similar patients without nurse-sensitive adverse events.

RESULTS

This study found that five adverse events considered nurse-sensitive caused nearly 1300 additional hospital days for 166 patients and generated more than Canadian dollars 600,000 in excess treatment costs.

CONCLUSION

The results present the financial consequences of the nurse-sensitive adverse events. Government should invest in prevention and in improvements to care quality and patient safety. Managers need to strengthen safety processes in their facilities and nurses should take greater precautions.

Additional Medical Costs Due to Hospital-Acquired Falls

OBJECTIVES

To explore the additional medical costs (AMCs) due to hospital-acquired falls (falls), as well as their impact on clinical services within hospitals under the nationally uniform universal health insurance system in Japan.

METHODS

With the use of administrative profiling data based on accounting systems linked with the Japanese social insurance medical fee schedule, we analyzed data from 2 teaching hospitals: Shimane University Hospital (SUH) and St. Mary's Hospital (SMH). We extracted 588 fall cases from 4669 incident reports in SUH and 1168 fall cases from 7717 incident reports in SMH that potentially incurred AMCs.

RESULTS

Additional medical costs were 364 ± 2129 USD for minor injuries and 4336 ± 3645 USD for major injuries at SUH (P < 0.001) and 114 ± 124 USD for minor injuries and 2267 ± 2811 USD for major injuries at SMH (P < 0.001). Among the clinical services provided, imaging services were the most frequently used, with 89.9% (n = 205) of 228 minor injuries at SUH and 86.7% (n = 339) of 391 minor injuries at SMH; imaging services were used in all major injury cases at both hospitals. Although the number of cases using additional procedure/surgery services was lower than those using imaging services at both hospitals, AMCs for procedure/surgery services accounted for the highest proportions of total AMCs in both hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Although falls with minor injuries outnumbered falls with major injuries, fall-related AMCs for the latter were higher at both teaching hospitals because procedure/surgery services were required for cases with major injuries such as femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. The findings suggest that hospital administrators and policy makers have to take appropriate measures to prevent major injuries inpatients due to hospital-acquired falls.

Prevalence and cost of imaging in inpatient falls: the rising cost of falling

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the type, prevalence, and cost of imaging following inpatient falls, identify factors associated with post-fall imaging, and determine correlates of positive versus negative imaging.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatient falls. Data were collected from the hospital's adverse event reporting system, DrQuality. Age, sex, date, time, and location of fall, clinical service, Morse Fall Scale/fall protocol, admitting diagnosis, and fall-related imaging studies were reviewed. Cost included professional and facilities fees for each study.

SETTING

Four hundred and fifteen bed urban academic hospital over 3 years (2008-2010).

PATIENTS

All adult inpatient falls during the study period were included. Falls experienced by patients aged <18 years, outpatient and emergency patients, visitors to the hospital, and staff were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Five hundred and thirty inpatient falls occurred during the study period, average patient age 60.7 years (range 20-98). More than half of falls were men (55%) and patients considered at risk of falls (56%). Falls were evenly distributed across morning (33%), evening (34%), and night (33%) shifts. Of 530 falls, 178 (34%) patients were imaged with 262 studies. Twenty percent of patients imaged had at least one positive imaging study attributed to the fall and 82% of studies were negative. Total cost of imaging was $160,897, 63% ($100,700) from head computed tomography (CT).

CONCLUSION

Inpatient falls affect patients of both sexes, all ages, occur at any time of day and lead to expensive imaging, mainly from head CTs. Further study should be targeted toward clarifying the indications for head CT after inpatient falls and validating risk models for positive and negative imaging, in order to decrease unnecessary imaging and thereby limit unnecessary cost and radiation exposure.

Delirium markers in older fallers: a case-control study

Background

When a hospitalized older patient falls or develops delirium, there are significant consequences for the patient and the health care system. Assessments of inattention and altered consciousness, markers for delirium, were analyzed to determine if they were also associated with falls.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study from a regional tertiary Veterans Affairs referral center identified falls and delirium risk factors from quality databases from 2010 to 2012. Older fallers with complete delirium risk assessments prior to falling were identified. As a control, non-fallers were matched at a 3:1 ratio. Admission risk factors that were compared in fallers and non-fallers included altered consciousness, cognitive performance, attention, sensory deficits, and dehydration. Odds ratio (OR) was reported (95% confidence interval [CI]).

Results

After identifying 67 fallers, the control population (n=201) was matched on age (74.4±9.8 years) and ward (83.6% medical; 16.4% intensive care unit). Inattention as assessed by the Months of the Year Backward test was more common in fallers (67.2% versus 50.8%, OR=2.0; 95% CI: 1.1–3.7). Fallers tended to have altered consciousness prior to falling (28.4% versus 12.4%, OR=2.8; 95% CI: 1.3–5.8).

Conclusion

In this case-control study, alterations in consciousness and inattention, assessed prior to falling, were more common in patients who fell. Brief assessments of consciousness and attention should be considered for inclusion in fall prediction.

Falls in hospital increase length of stay regardless of degree of harm

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Acute inpatient falls are common and serious adverse events that lead to injury, prolonged hospitalization and increased cost of care. To determine the difference in total acute hospital care length of stay (LOS) for patients with and without an in-hospital fall (IHF), regardless of degree of harm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study at a 728-bed acute care teaching hospital. We used propensity scores to match 292 patients with 330 controls by case mix group, sex, Resource Intensity Weights and week of admission. We used two administrative databases: hospital fall incident reporting system and Discharge Abstract Database. We reviewed all IHF incidents for patients 18 years and older, admitted to inpatient acute care hospital units/programs between 1 November 2009 and 31 August 2011.

RESULTS

The average LOS for IHF cases was 37.2 days [median 26.5 days; interquartile range (IQR) 14, 54] and 25.7 days (median 13 days; IQR 5, 33) for matched control patients. Survival analysis results indicated that patients who did not have an IHF were 2.4 times (95% CI 2.1, 2.7; P < 0.001) more likely to be discharged earlier from acute care than patients who had an IHF.

CONCLUSIONS

Experiencing either an injurious or a non-injurious fall during an acute care hospitalization was associated with prolonged LOS.

Falls prevention in hospitals and mental health units: an extended evaluation of the FallSafe quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

inpatient falls are a major patient safety issue causing distress, injury and death. Systematic review suggests multifactorial assessment and intervention can reduce falls by 20-30%, but large-scale studies of implementation are few. This paper describes an extended evaluation of the FallSafe quality improvement project, which presented key components of multifactorial assessment and intervention as a care bundle.

METHODS

: data on delivery of falls prevention processes were collected at baseline and for 18 months from nine FallSafe units and nine control units. Data on falls were collected from local risk management systems for 24 months, and data on under-reporting through staff surveys.

RESULTS

: in FallSafe units, delivery of seven care bundle components significantly improved; most improvements were sustained after active project support was withdrawn. Twelve-month moving average of reported fall rates showed a consistent downward trend in FallSafe units but not controls. Significant reductions in reported fall rate were found in FallSafe units (adjusted rate ratio (ARR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.84 P < 0.001) in the 12 months following full implementation but not in control units (ARR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.03 P = 0.13). No significant changes in injurious fall rate were found in FallSafe units (ARR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.03 P = 0.11), or controls (ARR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72-1.08 P = 0.13). In FallSafe units, staff certain falls had been reported increased from 60 to 77%.

CONCLUSION

: introducing evidence-based care bundles of multifactorial assessment and intervention using a quality improvement approach resulted in improved delivery of multifactorial assessment and intervention and significant reductions in fall rates, but not in injurious fall rates.

A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial for evaluating rates of falls among inpatients in aged care rehabilitation units receiving tailored multimedia education in addition to usual care: a trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Falls are the most frequent adverse event reported in hospitals. Approximately 30% of in-hospital falls lead to an injury and up to 2% result in a fracture. A large randomised trial found that a trained health professional providing individualised falls prevention education to older inpatients reduced falls in a cognitively intact subgroup. This study aims to investigate whether this efficacious intervention can reduce falls and be clinically useful and cost-effective when delivered in the real-life clinical environment.

METHODS

A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial will be used across eight subacute units (clusters) which will be randomised to one of four dates to start the intervention. Usual care on these units includes patient's screening, assessment and implementation of individualised falls prevention strategies, ongoing staff training and environmental strategies. Patients with better levels of cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination >23/30) will receive the individualised education from a trained health professional in addition to usual care while patient's feedback received during education sessions will be provided to unit staff. Unit staff will receive training to assist in intervention delivery and to enhance uptake of strategies by patients. Falls data will be collected by two methods: case note audit by research assistants and the hospital falls reporting system. Cluster-level data including patient's admissions, length of stay and diagnosis will be collected from hospital systems. Data will be analysed allowing for correlation of outcomes (clustering) within units. An economic analysis will be undertaken which includes an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by The University of Notre Dame Australia Human Research Ethics Committee and local hospital ethics committees.

RESULTS

The results will be disseminated through local site networks, and future funding and delivery of falls prevention programmes within WA Health will be informed. Results will also be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and medical conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry (ACTRN12612000877886).

Serious fall injuries in hospitalized patients with and without cancer

Characteristics of adults hospitalized with and without cancer were compared to determine factors of serious injuries after fall events. More patients with cancer who had a serious injury received corticosteroids (P = .005) and were treated on a palliative care floor. More patients without cancer had higher prevalence of stroke (P = .026) and diabetes (P = .041) history and were treated on a surgical floor. Future research is needed to identify interventions that could prevent serious injuries after fall events.

A pragmatic study of the predictive values of the Morse falls score

BACKGROUND

inpatient falls are an important safety challenge, with around half causing physical injuries that compromise the recovery of older, frailer patients. Falls risk scores are in widespread use, but validation studies of their predictive values are few.

OBJECTIVES

to assess the predictive values of the Morse falls score (MFS) in an acute general hospital.

METHODS

age, admitting speciality, MFS, and any falls in the subsequent 7 days were collected in April 2011 through case note review and incident reporting systems.

RESULTS

a total of 467 inpatients were included in the study; 51% were aged 75+ years; 56% had an MFS ≥25; 23% had an MFS ≥55; 28 fell. An MFS ≥25 was not significantly better than chance in the total sample or in any subgroups considered (YI: -0.01 to 0.15). An MFS ≥55 was significantly better than chance for the total sample (YI: 0.39), patients ≥75 years (YI: 0.31) and geriatrician-led wards (YI 0.37), although either sensitivity or specificity fell below 70% in each of these groups. Other subgroups did not demonstrate significantly better accuracy than chance, but may have been affected by type II error.

CONCLUSIONS

using MFS ≥25 cannot be clinically justified, while using MFS ≥55 would be contingent on an effective intervention that was ethically acceptable to withhold from the patients with an MFS < 55, despite >40% of falls occurring in that group. Given similar limitations of alternative falls risk scores, hospitals should consider directly assessing and acting on individual patients' specific modifiable risk factors for falls.

Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature

Falls are one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity in older adults. Every year, an estimated 30-40% of patients over the age of 65 will fall at least once. Falls lead to moderate to severe injuries, fear of falling, loss of independence and death in a third of those patients. The direct costs alone from fall related injuries are a staggering 0.1% of all healthcare expenditures in the United States and up to 1.5% of healthcare costs in European countries. This figure does not include the indirect costs of loss of income both to the patient and caregiver, the intangible losses of mobility, confidence, and functional independence. Numerous studies have attempted to define the risk factors for falls in older adults. The present review provides a brief summary and update of the relevant literature, summarizing demographic and modifiable risk factors. The major risk factors identified are impaired balance and gait, polypharmacy, and history of previous falls. Other risk factors include advancing age, female gender, visual impairments, cognitive decline especially attention and executive dysfunction, and environmental factors. Recommendations for the clinician to manage falls in older patients are also summarized.

"The balancing act"--licensed practical nurse experiences of falls and fall prevention: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Falls are common in old age and may have serious consequences. There are many strategies to predict and prevent falls from occurring in long-term care and hospitals. The aim of this study was to describe licensed practical nurse experiences of predicting and preventing further falls when working with patients who had experienced a fall-related fracture. Licensed practical nurses are the main caretakers that work most closely with the patients.

METHODS

A qualitative study of focus groups interviews and field observations was done. 15 licensed practical nurses from a rehabilitation ward and an acute ward in a hospital in northern Sweden were interviewed. Content was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The result of the licensed practical nurse thoughts and experiences about risk of falling and fall prevention work is represented in one theme, "the balancing act". The theme includes three categories: "the right to decide", "the constant watch", and "the ongoing negotiation" as well as nine subcategories. The analysis showed similarities and differences between rehabilitation and acute wards. At both wards it was a core strategy in the licensed practical nurse work to always be ready and to pay attention to patients' appearance and behavior. At the rehabilitation ward, it was an explicit working task to judge the patients' risk of falling and to be active to prevent falls. At the acute ward, the words "risk of falling" were not used and fall prevention were not discussed; instead the licensed practical nurses used for example "dizzy and pale". The results also indicated differences in components that facilitate workplace learning and knowledge transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between the wards are most probably rooted in organizational differences. When it is expected by the leadership, licensed practical nurses can express patient risk of falling, share their observations with others, and take actions to prevent falls. The climate and the structure of the ward are essential if licensed practical nurses are to be encouraged to routinely consider risk of falling and implement risk reduction strategies.

The economic burden of patient safety targets in acute care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to determine the quality of literature in costing of the economic burden of patient safety.

METHODS

We selected 15 types of patient safety targets for our systematic review. We searched the literature published between 2000 and 2010 using the following terms: "costs and cost analysis," "cost-effectiveness," "cost," and "financial management, hospital." We appraised the methodologic quality of potentially relevant studies using standard economic methods. We recorded results in the original currency, adjusted for inflation, and then converted to 2010 US dollars for comparative purposes (2010 US$1.00 = 2010 €0.76). The quality of each costing study per patient safety target was also evaluated.

RESULTS

We screened 1948 abstracts, and identified 158 potentially eligible studies, of which only 61 (39%) reported any costing methodology. In these 61 studies, we found wide estimates of the attributable costs of patient safety events ranging from $2830 to $10,074. In general hospital populations, the cost per case of hospital-acquired infection ranged from $2132 to $15,018. Nosocomial bloodstream infection was associated with costs ranging from $2604 to $22,414.

CONCLUSION

There are wide variations in the estimates of economic burden due to differences in study methods and methodologic quality. Greater attention to methodologic standards for economic evaluations in patient safety is needed.

An electronic fall prevention toolkit: effect on documentation quality

BACKGROUND

Nursing documentation is the record of care that is planned and given to patients, yet it is often missing or incomplete. A study of translating results from nurses' assessments of fall risk into tailored interventions using health information technology was used to examine nursing documentation of risk assessment, plans to manage those risks, and interventions to prevent falls.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic fall prevention toolkit for promoting documentation of fall risk status and planned and completed fall prevention interventions.

METHODS

Nursing documentation related to fall risk and prevention was reviewed in 30% of randomly selected medical records for patients on the eight study units (four intervention units; 5,267 patients) and four usual care units (5,116 patients) during three separate study visits.

RESULTS

Patients on the intervention units were more likely to have fall risk documented (89% vs. 64%, p < .0001). There were significantly more comprehensive plans of care for the patients on the interventions documented, although no differences were found related to documentation of completed interventions compared with usual care unit patient records.

DISCUSSION

The documentation of fall risk status and planned interventions tailored to patient-specific areas of risk was significantly better on the intervention units that used the fall prevention toolkit as compared with usual care units. Improved documentation quality did not extend to the documentation of completed interventions.

Estimating the Cost of Serious Injurious Falls in a Canadian Acute Care Hospital

Les chutes représentent 40 pour cent des accidents d’hôpitaux et leurs conséquences vont de zéro à des blessures graves. Le but de cette étude a été d’estimer le coût moyen à l’hôpital de la durée du séjour (DS) associée aux chutes liées aux préjudices graves dans un hôpital de soins actifs. Nous avons utilisé les données de gestion des risques et des bases de données qui représentent les frais associés à une blessure grave après une chute à l’hôpital. On a comparé trente-sept patients blessés à 2,330 contrôles en utilisant le diagnostic le plus responsable médical, et par l’âge et par le sexe des patients. En utilisant les t-tests et la regréssion multivariée, on a comparé le coût et la DS. Les coûts moyens pour ceux qui se sont grièvement blessés en tombant, et pour les contrôles sans chutes, étaient DC 44,203 $ et DC 13,507 $ tandis ceux de la DS était, respectivement, 45 et 11 jours. Le coût des soins d’hospitalisation pour un patient qui a subi une chute résultante en blessures graves était 30,696 $ (95% IC : $25,158 – $36,781) supérieur au coût pour quelqu’un qui ne s’est pas tombé. Les gestionnaires d’hôpitaux jouent un rôle de premier plan en créant des programmes dans le réseau pour prévenir les chutes et réduire les coûts hospitaliers.

Is there a link between the hospital-acquired injurious fall rates in US acute care hospitals and these institutions' implementation levels of computerized systems?

Medicare no longer reimburses acute care hospitals for the costs of additional care required due to hospital-acquired injuries. Consequently, this study explored the effective computerized systems to inform practice for better interventions to reduce fall risk. It provided a correlation between type of computerized system and hospital-acquired injurious fall rates at acute care hospitals in California, Florida, and New York. It used multiple publicly available data sets, with the hospital as the unit of analysis. Descriptive and Pearson correlation analyses were used. The analysis included 462 hospitals. Significant correlations could be categorized into two groups: (1) meaningful computerized systems that were associated with lower injurious fall rates: the decision support systems for drug allergy alerts, drug-drug interaction alerts, and drug-laboratory interaction alerts; and (2) computerized systems that were associated with higher injurious fall rates: the decision support system for drug-drug interaction alerts and the computerized provider order entry system for radiology tests. Future research may include additional states, multiple years of data, and patient-level data to validate this study's findings. This effort may further inform policy makers and the public about effective clinical computerized systems provided to clinicians to improve their practice decisions and care outcomes.

Nurses' caring attitude: fall prevention program implementation as an example of its importance

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM: Fall prevention programs are universally multidisciplinary, but nursing care plays the central role. Since October 2008, Medicare has no longer reimbursed acute care hospitals for the costs of additional care required due to hospital-acquired injuries (e.g., injurious falls).

PROBLEM

However, fall prevention programs for hospitalized patients have had limited success, and multifaceted strategies for implementing fall prevention programs cannot guarantee success. It is possible that cultivating and sustaining a caring attitude among clinicians is often overlooked as an intervention strategy.

METHOD

This article discusses the barriers to implementing fall prevention programs in acute care hospitals. The attributional theory of success and failure is used to analyze these barriers. In addition, the author discusses whether a lack of knowledge and/or a lack of caring attitude play a role as the underlying barriers to implementing a successful fall prevention program. A patient's story illustrates patients' expectations for the care environment to center on their needs. Possible educational strategies as interventions for fall prevention programs are discussed.

FINDINGS

It is suggested that education goals for nurses need to not only promote their professional knowledge and skills in implementing a fall prevention program but also cultivate their caring attitudes.

The cost of serious fall-related injuries at three Midwestern hospitals

BACKGROUND

Consequences of fall-related injuries can be both physically and financially costly, yet without current data, hospitals cannot completely determine the financial cost. As part of the analysis for an initiative to minimize falls with injury, the cost and length of stay attributable to serious fall injury were estimated at three hospitals in a Midwestern health care system

METHODS

In a retrospective case-control study, 57 hospital inpatients discharged between January 1, 2004, and October 16, 2006, who sustained a serious fall-related injury (fracture, subdural hematoma, any injury resulting in surgical intervention, or death) were identified through the incident reporting system and matched to nonfaller inpatient controls by hospital, age within five years, year of discharge, and diagnosis-related group (DRG).

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses indicated that operational costs for fallers with serious injury, as compared with controls, were $13,316 more (p < .01; 95% confidence interval [CI], $1,395-$35,561) and that fallers stayed 6.3 days longer than nonfallers (p < .001; 95% CI, 2.4-14.9). Univariate analyses indicated they were also significantly more likely to have diabetes with organ damage, moderate to severe renal disease, and a higher mean score on the Charlson Comorbidity Index. In optimal bipartite matching (OBM) analyses, fallers with serious injury cost $13,806 more (p < .001; 95% CI, $5,808-$29,450) and stayed 6.9 days longer (p < .001; 95% CI, 2.8-14.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital inpatients who sustained a serious fall-related injury had higher total operational costs and longer lengths of stay than nonfallers. Despite possible limitations regarding the cost allocation methods, the analysis included data from three different hospitals, and supplemental multivariate analyses adjusting for academic hospital status did not meaningfully affect the results.

Preventing falls and fall-related injuries in hospitals

Falls are a widespread concern in hospitals settings, with whole hospital rates of between 3 and 5 falls per 1000 bed-days representing around a million inpatient falls occurring in the United States each year. Between 1% and 3% of falls in hospitals result in fracture, but even minor injuries can cause distress and delay rehabilitation. Risk factors most consistently found in the inpatient population include a history of falling, muscle weakness, agitation and confusion, urinary incontinence or frequency, sedative medication, and postural hypotension. Based on systematic reviews, recent research, and clinical and ethical considerations, the most appropriate approach to fall prevention in the hospital environment includes multifactorial interventions with multiprofessional input. There is also some evidence that delirium avoidance programs, reducing sedative and hypnotic medication, in-depth patient education, and sustained exercise programs may reduce falls as single interventions. There is no convincing evidence that hip protectors, movement alarms, or low-low beds reduce falls or injury in the hospital setting. International approaches to developing and maintaining a fall prevention program suggest that commitment of management and a range of clinical and support staff is crucial to success.

Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance

BACKGROUND

Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compression stockings and conventional socks, in order to determine any traction benefit.

METHODS

Phase one involved slip resistance testing of two commercially available non-slip socks and one compression-stocking sample through an independent blinded materials testing laboratory using a Wet Pendulum Test.Phase two of the study involved in-situ testing among healthy adult subjects (n = 3). Subjects stood unsupported on a variable angle, inclined platform topped with hospital grade vinyl, in a range of foot conditions (bare feet, non-slip socks, conventional socks and compression stockings). Inclination was increased incrementally for each condition until slippage of any magnitude was detected. The platform angle was monitored using a spatial orientation tracking sensor and slippage point was recorded on video.

RESULTS

Phase one results generated through Wet Pendulum Test suggested that non-slip socks did not offer better traction than compression stockings. However, in phase two, slippage in compression stockings was detected at the lowest angles across all participants. Amongst the foot conditions tested, barefoot conditions produced the highest slip angles for all participants indicating that this foot condition provided the highest slip resistance.

CONCLUSION

It is evident that bare feet provide better slip resistance than non-slip socks and therefore might represent a safer foot condition. This study did not explore whether traction provided by bare feet was comparable to 'optimal' footwear such as shoes. However, previous studies have associated barefoot mobilisation with increased falls. Therefore, it is suggested that all patients continue to be encouraged to mobilise in appropriate, well-fitting shoes whilst in hospital. Limitations of this study in relation to the testing method, participant group and sample size are discussed.

Cluster randomised trial of a targeted multifactorial intervention to prevent falls among older people in hospital

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of a targeted multifactorial falls prevention programme in elderly care wards with relatively short lengths of stay.

DESIGN

Cluster randomised trial.

SETTING

24 elderly care wards in 12 hospitals in Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

3999 patients, mean age 79 years, with a median hospital stay of seven days.

INTERVENTIONS

A nurse and physiotherapist each worked for 25 hours a week for three months in all intervention wards. They provided a targeted multifactorial intervention that included a risk assessment of falls, staff and patient education, drug review, modification of bedside and ward environments, an exercise programme, and alarms for selected patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Falls during hospital stay.

RESULTS

Intervention and control wards were similar at baseline for previous rates of falls and individual patient characteristics. Overall, 381 falls occurred during the study. No difference was found in fall rates during follow-up between intervention and control wards: respectively, 9.26 falls per 1000 bed days and 9.20 falls per 1000 bed days (P=0.96). The incidence rate ratio adjusted for individual lengths of stay and previous fall rates in the ward was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.28).

CONCLUSION

A targeted multifactorial falls prevention programme was not effective among older people in hospital wards with relatively short lengths of stay.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRNO 12605000467639.

The Consequences of Falls in Acute and Subacute Hospitals in Australia That Cause Proximal Femoral Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare consequences for patients with proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) sustained in the hospital with patients who sustained PFFs in the community.

DESIGN

Data were collected from inpatient notes and incident reports of patients admitted to hospitals over a 6-year period. All patients aged 75 and older sustaining a PFF in the hospital were identified and matched according to sex, age, and fracture date with patients who sustained a PFF in the community.

SETTING

Illawarra region hospitals, New South Wales, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-three patients with a hospital-acquired PFF and 43 patients with a community-acquired PFF; mean age was 84.0 (range 75-92), and 67% were women.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes at hospital discharge and circumstances of hospital-acquired PFF.

RESULTS

Comparing outcomes of subjects with hospital versus community-acquired PFF revealed that 12 versus four died in the hospital (P=.03), 14 versus five were discharged to long-term nursing care facilities (P=.02), six versus 18 returned to preadmission ambulation (P=.004), and four versus 24 returned to preadmission activity of daily living status (P<.001). The median postfracture length of stay was 46 days for subjects with hospital-acquired PFF versus 32 days for those sustaining a PFF in the community (P<.01). Review of circumstances of the 43 hospital-acquired fractures revealed that 26 occurred in subacute wards, 25 occurred in bedrooms, 25 occurred at night, and 38 occurred while unsupervised.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hospital-acquired PFF have poor outcomes. Adequate supervision, provision of hip protectors in the hospital, and strategies that address fracture circumstances may hold the keys to prevention.