The Prometheus device for extracorporeal support of combined liver and renal failure

Hepatorenal Syndrome-Novel Insights into Diagnostics and Treatment

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a disorder associated with cirrhosis and renal impairment, with portal hypertension as its major underlying cause. Moreover, HRS is the third most common cause of acute kidney injury, thus creating a major public health concern. This review summarizes the available information on the pathophysiological implications of HRS. We discuss pathogenesis associated with HRS. Mechanisms such as dysfunction of the circulatory system, bacterial infection, inflammation, impaired renal autoregulation, circulatory, and others, which have been identified as critical pathways for development of HRS, have become easier to diagnose in recent years. Additionally, relatively recently, renal dysfunction biomarkers have been found indicating renal injury, which are involved in the pathophysiology of HRS. This review also summarizes the available information on the management of HRS, focusing on vasoconstrictive drugs, renal replacement therapy, and liver transplant together with currently being investigated novel therapies. Analyzing new discoveries for the underlying causes of this condition assists the general research to improve understanding of the mechanism of pathophysiology and thus prevention of HRS.

Efficiency and safety of total plasma exchange in critically ill cirrhotic patients with acute on chronic liver failure: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment of patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted to the ICU is very limited. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficiency on liver function and safety of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in critically ill cirrhotic patients admitted with ACLF in a liver ICU.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort of patients with ACLF grade > 2 treated by TPE admitted to the ICU that was matched to a control group. TPE was performed using a plasma filter (TPE2000, BAXTER®) on a CRRT machine (Prismaflex®, Baxter®). Ratio and type of fluid replacement were 50 % with 5 % albumin solution followed by 50 % with fresh frozen plasma.

RESULTS

Seven patients with a mean age of 50.6 ± 7.8 years (all males) and 14 controls matched to age, sex, etiology and cause of decompensation were recruited. At ICU admission, mean MELD score was 39.1 ± 2.7, mean SOFA score was 11.6 ± 5.2 and mean CLIF SOFA score was 12.9 ± 2.6. The grade of ACLF was 3 for 3 patients (42.9 %) and 2 for 4 patients (57.1 %). The TPE group had significantly higher levels of bilirubin (392.3 ± 117.1μmol/l vs. 219 ± 185μmol/l , p = 0.04), and INR values (5.7 ± 3.4 vs. 3.5 ± 0.9, p < 0.005) compared to the control group. Patient survival was respectively 28.6 % and 14.3 % at 30 and 90 days in the TPE group and 35.7 % and 7.14 % in the control group respectively (HR: 1 (95 % CI 0.19- 5.2; p = 1). One patient in the TPE group had a liver transplantation 13 days after admission to ICU and is still alive and none in the control group. Two (28.6 %) patients died from complications related to the double lumen catheter used for TPE.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study of TPE in patients with ACLF grade 2 and 3 showed a marked but transient improvement in liver function tests. TPE worth to be evaluated in large trials in ACLF patients, with a liver transplant project, and less organ failure.

Liver replacement therapy with extracorporeal blood purification techniques current knowledge and future directions

Clinically, it is highly challenging to promote recovery in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Despite recent advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms of ALF and ACLF, standard medical therapy remains the primary therapeutic approach. Liver transplantation (LT) is considered the last option, and in several cases, it is the only intervention that can be lifesaving. Unfortunately, this intervention is limited by organ donation shortage or exclusion criteria such that not all patients in need can receive a transplant. Another option is to restore impaired liver function with artificial extracorporeal blood purification systems. The first such systems were developed at the end of the 20^th century, providing solutions as bridging therapy, either for liver recovery or LT. They enhance the elimination of metabolites and substances that accumulate due to compromised liver function. In addition, they aid in clearance of molecules released during acute liver decompensation, which can initiate an excessive inflammatory response in these patients causing hepatic encephalopathy, multiple-organ failure, and other complications of liver failure. As compared to renal replacement therapies, we have been unsuccessful in using artificial extracorporeal blood purification systems to completely replace liver function despite the outstanding technological evolution of these systems. Extracting middle to high-molecular-weight and hydrophobic/protein-bound molecules remains extremely challenging. The majority of the currently available systems include a combination of methods that cleanse different ranges and types of molecules and toxins. Furthermore, conventional methods such as plasma exchange are being re-evaluated, and novel adsorption filters are increasingly being used for liver indications. These strategies are very promising for the treatment of liver failure. Nevertheless, the best method, system, or device has not been developed yet, and its probability of getting developed in the near future is also low. Furthermore, little is known about the effects of liver support systems on the overall and transplant-free survival of these patients, and further investigation using randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses is needed. This review presents the most popular extracorporeal blood purification techniques for liver replacement therapy. It focuses on general principles of their function, and on evidence regarding their effectiveness in detoxification and in supporting patients with ALF and ACLF. In addition, we have outlined the basic advantages and disadvantages of each system.

Position paper on liver and kidney diseases from the Italian Association for the Study of Liver (AISF), in collaboration with the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN)

Liver and kidney are strictly connected in a reciprocal manner, in both the physiological and pathological condition. The Italian Association for the Study of Liver, in collaboration with the Italian Society of Nephrology, with this position paper aims to provide an up-to-date overview on the principal relationships between these two important organs. A panel of well-recognized international expert hepatologists and nephrologists identified five relevant topics: 1) The diagnosis of kidney damage in patients with chronic liver disease; 2) Acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis; 3) Association between chronic liver disease and chronic kidney disease; 4) Kidney damage according to different etiology of liver disease; 5) Polycystic kidney and liver disease. The discussion process started with a review of the literature relating to each of the five major topics and clinical questions and related statements were subsequently formulated. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were graded according to the GRADE system. The statements presented here highlight the importance of strong collaboration between hepatologists and nephrologists for the management of critically ill patients, such as those with combined liver and kidney impairment.

Artificial liver support systems

Artificial liver systems are used to bridge between transplantation or to allow a patient's liver to recover. They are used in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure. There are five artificial systems currently in use: molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), Prometheus, selective plasma filtration therapy, and hemodiafiltration. The aim is to compare existing data on the efficiency of these devices. A literature search was conducted using online libraries. Inclusion criteria included randomized control trials or comparative human studies published after the year 2000. A systematic review was conducted for the five individual devices with a more detailed comparison of the biochemistry for the SPAD and MARS systems. Eighty-nine patients were involved in the review comparing SPAD and MARS. Results showed that there was an average reduction in bilirubin (-53 μmol/L in MARS and -50 μmol/L in SPAD), creatinine (-19.5 μmol/L in MARS and -7.5 μmol/L in SPAD), urea (-0.9 mmol/L in MARS and -0.75 mmol/L in SPAD), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (-0.215 μmol/L·s in MARS and -0.295 μmol/L·s in SPAD) in both SPAD and MARS. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in the two systems. This review demonstrated that both MARS and SPAD aid recovery of ALF. There is no difference between the efficiency of MARS and SPAD. Because of the limited data, there is a need for more randomized control trials. Evaluating cost and patient preference would aid in differentiating the systems.

Extracorporeal Mass Exchange Technology Platform for Temporary Liver Support: A Clinical Feasibility Study on a Device and the Cell Source Primary Human Liver Cells

Clinical feasibility phase-I study data are discussed on the use and the safety of a modular mass exchanger for temporary extracorporeal treatment of liver failure; and the use of the cell source primary human liver cells isolated from discarded transplant organs as a metabolic module in this mass exchanger. This technology platform can be compared with the mass exchange functions of a human placenta before giving birth. The "maternal blood side" can be used with various sources/modules of metabolic support including artificial (e.g. absorber) or biological elements (e.g. cells), separated by membrane compartments. These keep the source of metabolic support from contact with the patient, including the immune cells, while allowing exchange of soluble or protein-bound plasma components for therapy. Each of the multiple independent membrane compartments are bundled towards the in/outlets but interwoven to form a decentralized multi-compartment mass exchanger within an effector module compartment. The use of liver cells as a metabolic module in this compartment results in its function as a bioreactor. A combination with further modules outside of the mass exchanger was demonstrated through a continuous SPAD for detoxification. Nine patients (5 m, 4 f) with a median age of 43 years (range 11-55 years) were treated with a total of 11 metabolic modules in 12 sessions, with overall treatment times ranging from 11 to 216 hours. Patients suffered from acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF, n=3), acute liver failure (ALF, n=3) and primary non-function graft after liver transplantation (PNF, n=3). Treatment resulted in a one-year survival of 78%. The results showed a significant decrease in thrombocytes and fibrinogen. No severe adverse effects were found. One patient (AoCLF) recovered without transplantation and remained alive for the one-year follow-up. Six patients (3 ALF, 2 PNF, and 1 AoCLF) were successfully bridged to transplantation, and two (1 AoCLF, 1 PNF) died within ten days after termination of therapy. Total and conjugated bilirubin, ammonia, urea and creatinine were significantly reduced by the end of therapy, compared to baseline. The MELD score decreased significantly, whereas no significant improvements were observed in APACHE-II, APACHE-III, SOFA and Child-Pugh scores. Conclusion: The mass exchanger technology platform, the Core Module used with primary human liver cells as Metabolic Module, proved to be clinically feasible and safe. Further clinical studies are required to prove the efficacy of such therapies. However, the clinical impact of using human liver cells as a Metabolic Module is limited and a reliable, biocompatible and effective metabolic source is in need.

Hepatorenal syndrome in the era of acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of patients with advanced cirrhosis that it is associated with increased hospital admissions and decreased survival. The definition of AKI in cirrhosis has been recently modified and the new diagnostic criteria are based on small changes in serum creatinine with respect to previous values, occurring within a short period of time. The use of this new definition may lead to an earlier identification of renal impairment and better prognostic stratification. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a unique form of AKI developing in patients with end-stage liver disease. Systemic circulatory dysfunction and marked kidney vasoconstriction play a key role in the development of HRS. The modification of the definition of AKI has also led to a change in the diagnostic criteria of HRS. The new diagnostic criteria are based on AKI stages and there is no need to reach a specific serum creatinine threshold. According to these new criteria, treatment with vasoconstrictors and albumin for the management of HRS will be started at lower serum creatinine values, with expected higher response rates. Finally, there are consistent data showing that some urine biomarkers, particularly NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin), may be useful in daily clinical practice for the differential diagnosis of the cause of AKI in cirrhosis.

Prometheus: From Legend to the Real Liver Support Therapy

Background

A large number of patients develop liver disease that may evolve into progressive chronic failure. Artificial liver support systems (e.g., MARS and Prometheus) are considered in the framework of the steady increase in the number of patients who could possibly benefit from these blood purification devices. Albumin dialysis and adsorption are now two integrated concepts. The present know-how enabling us to appropriately modify several intrinsic characteristics of the adsorbents - e.g., their chemical nature, the particle and pore size distribution, as well as a larger surface offered to adsorption - has helped in better fine-tuning liver support systems to improve adsorption kinetics and flow characteristics specifically for the intended clinical application. These properties together with an improved biocompatibility have made possible the development of adsorptive techniques for which clearances and total removal rates of target compound would be unthinkable with conventional hemodialysis or hemofiltration. Several adsorptive techniques are already available commercially for the treatment of sepsis and septic shock and of acute liver failure, but controlled studies with clinical end points are still lacking.

Nomenclature for renal replacement therapy and blood purification techniques in critically ill patients: practical applications

This article reports the conclusions of the second part of a consensus expert conference on the nomenclature of renal replacement therapy (RRT) techniques currently utilized to manage acute kidney injury and other organ dysfunction syndromes in critically ill patients. A multidisciplinary approach was taken to achieve harmonization of definitions, components, techniques, and operations of the extracorporeal therapies. The article describes the RRT techniques in detail with the relevant technology, procedures, and phases of treatment and key aspects of volume management/fluid balance in critically ill patients. In addition, the article describes recent developments in other extracorporeal therapies, including therapeutic plasma exchange, multiple organ support therapy, liver support, lung support, and blood purification in sepsis. This is a consensus report on nomenclature harmonization in extracorporeal blood purification therapies, such as hemofiltration, plasma exchange, multiple organ support therapies, and blood purification in sepsis.

Extracorporeal support for patients with acute and acute on chronic liver failure

The number of patients developing liver failure; acute on chronic liver failure and acute liver failure continues to increase, along with the demand for donor livers for transplantation. As such there is a clinical need to develop effective extracorporeal devices to support patients with acute liver failure or acute-on-chronic liver failure to allow time for hepatocyte regeneration, and so avoiding the need for liver transplantation, or to bridge the patient to liver transplantation, and also potentially to provide symptomatic relief for patients with cirrhosis not suitable for transplantation. Currently devices can be divided into those designed to remove toxins, including plasma exchange, high permeability dialyzers and adsorption columns or membranes, coupled with replacement of plasma proteins; albumin dialysis systems; and bioartificial devices which may provide some of the biological functions of the liver. In the future we expect combinations of these devices in clinical practice, due to the developments in bioartificial scaffolds.

Hepatorenal syndrome: aetiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Acute renal impairment is common in patients with chronic liver disease, occurring in approximately 19% of hospitalised patients with cirrhosis. A variety of types of renal impairment are recognised. The most important of these is the hepatorenal syndrome, a functional renal impairment due to circulatory and neurohormonal abnormalities that underpin cirrhosis. It is one of the most severe complications of cirrhosis with survival often measured in weeks to months. A variety of treatment options exist with early diagnosis and appropriate treatment providing the best hope for cure. This paper provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review of hepatorenal syndrome and lays out the topic according to the following sections: pathophysiology, historical developments, diagnostic criteria and limitations, epidemiology, precipitating factors, predictors, clinical and laboratory findings, prognosis, treatment options, prophylaxis, and conclusion.

Liver dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: current and future perspectives

Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are known to have a very high mortality rate as the majority of these patients succumb to multiorgan failure. Liver transplant remains the only option for these patients; however, there are problems with its availability, cost and also the complications and side effects associated with immunosuppression. Unlike advanced decompensated liver disease, there is a potential for hepatic regeneration and recovery in patients with ACLF. A liver support system, cell or non-cell based, logically is likely to provide temporary functional support until the donor liver becomes available or the failing liver survives the onslaught of the acute insult and spontaneously regenerates. Understanding the pathogenesis of liver failure and regeneration is essential to define the needs for a support system. Removal of hepatotoxic metabolites and inhibitors of hepatic regeneration by liver dialysis, a non-cell-based hepatic support, could help to provide a suitable microenvironment and support the failing liver. The current systems, i.e., MARS and Prometheus, have failed to show survival benefits in patients with ACLF based on which newer devices with improved functionality are currently under development. However, larger randomized trials are needed to prove whether these devices can enable restoration of the complex dysregulated immune system and impact organ failure and mortality in these patients.

Hepatorenal Syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most serious hepatorenal disorder and one of the most difficult to treat. To date, the best treatment options are those that reverse the mechanisms underlying HRS: portal hypertension, splanchnic vasodilation, and/or renal vasoconstriction. Therefore, liver transplantation is the preferred definitive treatment option. The role of other therapies is predominantly to prolong survival sufficiently to allow patients to undergo transplantation. Terlipressin with the addition of adjunctive albumin volume expansion is the preferred pharmacologic therapy for the treatment of patients with HRS. Norepinephrine and vasopressin are acceptable alternatives in countries where terlipressin is not yet available. For patients with Type II HRS, midodrine plus octreotide appears to be an effective pharmacologic regimen that can be administered outside of an intensive care unit setting. Regardless of chosen vasoconstrictor therapy, careful monitoring is needed to ensure tissue ischemia and severe adverse effects do not occur. Artificial hepatic support devices, renal replacement therapy, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are non-pharmacologic options for patients with HRS. However, hepatic support devices and renal replacement therapies have not yet demonstrated improved outcomes and TIPS is difficult to be employed in patients with Type I HRS due to contraindications in the majority of patients. Despite advances in our understanding of hepatorenal syndrome, the disease is still associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. More evidence is urgently needed to help improve patient outcomes in this difficult-to-treat population.

Acute kidney injury in acute liver failure: a review

Acute liver failure is a rare and often devastating condition consequent on massive liver cell necrosis that frequently affects young, previously healthy individuals resulting in altered cognitive function, coagulopathy and peripheral vasodilation. These patients frequently develop concurrent acute kidney injury (AKI). This abrupt and sustained decline in renal function, through a number of pathogenic mechanisms such as renal hypoperfusion, direct drug-induced nephrotoxicity or sepsis/systemic inflammatory response contributes to increased morbidity and is strongly associated with a worse prognosis. Improved understanding of the pathophysiology AKI in the context of acute liver failure may be beneficial in a number of areas; the development of new and sensitive biomarkers of renal dysfunction, refining prognosis and organ allocation, and ultimately leading to the development of novel treatment strategies, these issues are discussed in more detail in this expert review.

Cerebral microdialysis reflects the neuroprotective effect of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption in acute liver failure better and earlier than intracranial pressure: a controlled study in pigs

BACKGROUND

Cerebral edema is a well-recognized and potentially fatal complication of acute liver failure (ALF). The effectiveness of treatments that address intracranial hypertension is generally assessed by measuring intracranial pressure (ICP). The aim of this study was to determine the role of cerebral microdialysis in monitoring the efficacy of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA) treatment for ALF. We hypothesized that in ALF cerebral microdialysis reflects the benefits of FPSA treatment on cerebral edema before ICP.

METHODS

A surgical resection model of ALF was used in 21 pigs. We measured plasma ammonia concentration, brain concentrations of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glutamine, and ICP. Animals were randomized into three groups: in one group eight animals received 6 hours of FPSA treatment 2 hours after induction of ALF; in another group 10 animals received supportive treatment for ALF only; and in the final group three underwent sham surgery.

RESULTS

The ICP was significantly higher in the ALF group than in the FPSA group 9 hours after surgery. The lactate/pyruvate (L/P) ratio was significantly lower in the FPSA group than the ALF group 5 hours after surgery, before any significant difference in ICP was detected. Indeed, significant changes in the L/P ratio could be observed within 1 hour of treatment. Glutamine levels were significantly lower in the FPSA group than the ALF group between 6 hours and 10 hours after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain lactate/pyruvate ratio and concentration of glutamine measured by cerebral microdialysis reflected the beneficial effects of FPSA treatment on cerebral metabolism more precisely and rapidly than ICP in pigs with fulminant ALF. The role of glutamine as a marker of the efficacy of FPSA treatment for ALF appears promising, but needs further evaluation.

Artificial and bioartificial liver support

The fact that liver failure constitutes a life-threatening condition and can, in most cases, only be overcome by orthotopic liver transplantation, lead to the development of various artificial and bioartificial liver support devices. While artificial systems are based on the principles of adsorption and filtration, the more complex concept of bioartificial devices includes the provision of liver cells. Instead of solely focussing on detoxification, these concepts also support the failing organ concerning synthetic and regulative functions.The systems were evaluated in a variety of clinical studies, demonstrating their safety and investigating the impact on the patient's clinical condition. This review gives an overview over the most common artificial and bioartificial liver support devices and summarizes the results of the clinical studies.

Kidneys in chronic liver diseases

Acute kidney injury (AKI), defined as an abrupt increase in the serum creatinine level by at least 0.3 mg/dL, occurs in about 20% of patients hospitalized for decompensating liver cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis are susceptible to developing AKI because of the progressive vasodilatory state, reduced effective blood volume and stimulation of vasoconstrictor hormones. The most common causes of AKI in cirrhosis are pre-renal azotemia, hepatorenal syndrome and acute tubular necrosis. Differential diagnosis is based on analysis of circumstances of AKI development, natriuresis, urine osmolality, response to withdrawal of diuretics and volume repletion, and rarely on renal biopsy. Chronic glomerulonephritis and obstructive uropathy are rare causes of azotemia in cirrhotic patients. AKI is one of the last events in the natural history of chronic liver disease, therefore, such patients should have an expedited referral for liver transplantation. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is initiated by progressive portal hypertension, and may be prematurely triggered by bacterial infections, nonbacterial systemic inflammatory reactions, excessive diuresis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, diarrhea or nephrotoxic agents. Each type of renal disease has a specific treatment approach ranging from repletion of the vascular system to renal replacement therapy. The treatment of choice in type 1 hepatorenal syndrome is a combination of vasoconstrictor with albumin infusion, which is effective in about 50% of patients. The second-line treatment of HRS involves a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, renal vasoprotection or systems of artificial liver support.

Effects of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption on survival in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA) is an extracorporeal procedure that supports liver function by removing endogenous toxins that cause complications from acute-on-chronic liver failure (AOCLF). We performed a randomized trial to investigate survival of patients with AOCLF treated with FPSA.

METHODS

Patients with AOCLF were randomly assigned to groups given a combination of FPSA and standard medical therapy (SMT) (FPSA group, n = 77) or only SMT (SMT group, n = 68). The Prometheus liver support system was used to provide 8 to 11 rounds of FPSA (minimum of 4 hours each) for 3 weeks. Primary end points were survival probabilities at days 28 and 90, irrespective of liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical parameters and number of transplant patients were similar between study arms. Serum bilirubin level decreased significantly in the FPSA group but not in the SMT group. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the probabilities of survival on day 28 were 66% in the FPSA group and 63% in the SMT group (P = .70); on day 90, they were 47% and 38%, respectively (P = .35). Baseline factors independently associated with poor prognosis were high SOFA score, bleeding, female sex, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, intermediate increases in serum creatinine concentration, and combination of alcoholic and viral etiology of liver disease. There were no differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Among all patients with AOCLF, extracorporeal liver support with FPSA does not increase the probability of survival. Further studies are needed to assess whether therapy might be beneficial in specific subsets of patients.

Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group

Introduction

Renal dysfunction is a common complication in patients with end-stage cirrhosis. Since the original publication of the definition and diagnostic criteria for the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), there have been major advances in our understanding of its pathogenesis. The prognosis of patients with cirrhosis who develop HRS remains poor, with a median survival without liver transplantation of less than six months. However, a number of pharmacological and other therapeutic strategies have now become available which offer the ability to prevent or treat renal dysfunction more effectively in this setting. Accordingly, we sought to review the available evidence, make recommendations and delineate key questions for future studies.

Methods

We undertook a systematic review of the literature using Medline, PubMed and Web of Science, data provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the bibliographies of key reviews. We determined a list of key questions and convened a two-day consensus conference to develop summary statements via a series of alternating breakout and plenary sessions. In these sessions, we identified supporting evidence and generated recommendations and/or directions for future research.

Results

Of the 30 questions considered, we found inadequate evidence for the majority of questions and our recommendations were mainly based on expert opinion. There was insufficient evidence to grade three questions, but we were able to develop a consensus definition for acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis and provide consensus recommendations for future investigations to address key areas of uncertainty.

Conclusions

Despite a paucity of sufficiently powered prospectively randomized trials, we were able to establish an evidence-based appraisal of this field and develop a set of consensus recommendations to standardize care and direct further research for patients with cirrhosis and renal dysfunction.

Artificial extracorporeal liver support therapy in patients with severe liver failure

Severe liver failure is common and carries a high mortality risk in patients with both acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure. The failing liver constitutes a medical emergency, and in many cases liver transplantation is the only definite treatment. Extracorporeal liver support can be employed as a strategy for bridging to transplantation or recovery. This article focuses on options for artificial (nonbiological) extracorporeal treatment: single-pass albumin dialysis, fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus(®)) and the molecular adsorbent recirculatory system. Their different principles, potential advantages and indications are discussed. Despite proven biochemical efficacy, there are little data regarding clinical end points. Thus far, molecular adsorbent recirculatory system therapy in acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure showed no survival benefit compared with standard medical therapy. Prometheus therapy showed reduced mortality in subgroups of higher severity of disease compared with standard medical therapy. Nevertheless, the value of extracorporeal liver support remains to be corroborated by further clinical studies that include the optimal timing, mode, intensity and duration of this treatment.

The treatment of acute liver failure with fractionated plasma separation and adsorption system: Experience in 85 applications

INTRODUCTION

Artificial liver support systems represent a potential useful option for the treatment of liver failure. The outcomes of patients treated with the fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA) system are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FPSA was performed 85 times for 27 patients (median 3 treatments/patient) with liver failure [85.2% acute liver failure (ALF) and 14.8% acute-on-chronic liver failure] using the Prometheus 4008H (Fresenius Medical Care) unit. Citrate was used for anticoagulation. A variety of clinical and biochemical parameters were assessed. Comparisons between pretreatment and post-treatment data were performed using paired t-test.

RESULTS

The 85 sessions had a mean duration of 6 h. There were significant decreases in total bilirubin (13.18 +/- 9.46 mg/dL vs. 9.76 +/- 7.05 mg/dL; P < 0.0001), ammonia (167.6 +/- 75 mg/dL vs. 120 +/- 43.8 mg/dL; P < 0.0001), blood urea nitrogen (BUN; 12.55 +/- 13.03 mg/dL vs. 8.18 +/- 8.15 mg/dL; P < 0.0001), creatinine (0.54 +/- 0.47 mg/dL vs. 0.46 +/- 0.37 mg/dL; P = 0.0022) levels, and in pH (7.48 +/- 0.05 vs. 7.44 +/- 0.08; P = 0.0045). Four patients (14.8%) received liver transplantation after the treatments; in nine patients, transplantation was not necessary anymore (33%); the remaining 14 patients did not receive a transplantation because they were either not appropriate candidates or no organ was available. Overall survival was 48.1% (4 transplanted and 9 treated patients). No hematological complications related to FPSA were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

FPSA system is a safe and effective detoxification method for patients with liver dysfunction, including ALF. The system is useful as a symptomatic treatment before liver transplantation; in up to 1/3 of the cases, it can even be used as a sole method of treatment.

Removal of asymmetric dimethylarginine during artificial liver support using fractionated plasma separation and adsorption

OBJECTIVE

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is the most potent endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. Elevated ADMA levels have been linked to increased mortality in different patient populations. Key regulation of ADMA levels mainly takes place in the liver. Hence, ADMA is elevated in liver disease. There is no specific pharmacological treatment to lower the elevated ADMA levels. Hemodialysis is of limited efficiency in removing ADMA as it is highly protein bound. Prometheus is an extracorporeal liver support system which allows the removal of protein-bound toxins. We assessed the efficiency of the Prometheus system in reducing high ADMA levels in patients with liver failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied nine patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and concomitant renal failure already necessitating hemodialysis. Seven patients needed intensive care treatment. Two consecutive sessions of Prometheus therapy of each 4 h were performed in all patients. ADMA and its structural isomer symmetrical dimethylarginine (SDMA) were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

ADMA levels correlated to model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score (r(s) = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Before Prometheus was started, levels of ADMA and SDMA were elevated (1.36 +/- 0.5 micromol/l and 1.90 +/- 0.4 micromol/l, respectively). During Prometheus treatments, plasma levels of ADMA dropped by a mean 25% (p < 0.0001) and SDMA levels by 22% (p < 0.0001). However, there was a significant rebound of ADMA levels between the two therapy sessions (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows for the first time that plasma levels of ADMA can be effectively lowered by an artificial liver support system (Prometheus). Effective elimination of ADMA might explain some of the beneficial clinical effects of these systems in patients with liver failure.

[Evaluation of extracorporeal liver support systems in the treatment of liver failure. A systematic review]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MARS and Prometheus extracorporeal liver support systems in the treatment of liver failure.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to June 2009 in the Medline, Embase, HTA, DARE, NHSEED, Cochrane Library Plus, Clinical Trials Registry and HSRPROJ databases. Study selection was based on a series of previously established inclusion criteria related to the study design, population, type of intervention, language, and outcome measures.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients with acute liver failure or acute exacerbations of chronic liver failure treated with the MARS or Prometheus systems.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data on safety, long-term survival, clinical effects and biochemical and hemodynamic variables.

RESULTS

We selected 22 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the MARS and Prometheus systems. Adequate evaluation of these techniques was hampered by the heterogeneity of the studies and their methodological limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal liver support systems are able to purify both hydrosoluble and protein-bound substances. However, current data show that only the MARS system reduces mortality in acute liver failure and in acute exacerbations of chronic liver failure, although this reduction is non-significant. These techniques can be considered safe, with adverse effects similar to those of the control group. Their main indication is severe liver failure, for short periods while the liver recovers or a liver transplant becomes available.

Treatment of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a type of renal failure that occurs in patients with advanced cirrhosis. It is a result of splanchnic arterial vasodilation, renal vasoconstriction, reduced effective arterial volume, and potentially reduced cardiac output. Often, HRS is a fatal complication, and the only definitive treatment currently available is liver or liver-kidney transplantation. A number of other treatment modalities have been tested for the management of HRS, but most evidence is derived from small noncontrolled studies. The primary role of these treatment options is to provide a bridge to liver transplantation. Treatment may also provide acute reversal of renal failure and some symptomatic relief, but relapse is a common occurrence. The best therapeutic options appear to be those that reverse portal hypertension, splanchnic vasodilation, and/or renal vasoconstriction. Vasopressin analogs, particularly terlipressin, have emerged as the preferred pharmacologic therapies for management of HRS. Albumin is an appropriate adjunctive therapy to terlipressin and can be used to prevent HRS in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may provide a surgical option for qualified patients with HRS. Octreotide is ineffective as monotherapy but may be used as adjunctive therapy to other vasoactive agents. Dopamine agonists, endothelin antagonists, natriuretic peptides, and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors have not been effective for reversing HRS. Artificial hepatic support therapies have demonstrated the ability to improve laboratory abnormalities in patients with HRS, but their effect on clinical outcomes has not been determined. The role of renal replacement therapies or the newer artificial hepatic support therapies need further evaluation before they can be routinely recommended.

Liver support systems today

A májelégtelenség – akár korábbi májbetegség fennállása nélkül alakult ki (akut májelégtelenség), akár krónikus májbetegség akut dekompenzációja („akut a krónikuson” májelégtelenség) következménye – magas halálozással jár. A végállapotú májbetegségek következtében kialakult májelégtelenség egyetlen kuratív megoldása ma a májtranszplantáció. Ennek fő gátját a rendelkezésre álló donorszervek hiánya képezi, emiatt sok, várólistán szereplő beteg exitál. A transzplantáció korlátai tették szükségessé olyan májtámogató rendszerek kifejlesztését, amelyek alkalmasak a beteg életben tartására a szervátültetésig vagy a máj regenerációjáig. A korai próbálkozások (hemodialízis, hemoperfúzió, cseretranszfúzió, kereszthemodialízis, keresztkeringés, plazmaferézis stb.) elégtelennek bizonyultak. Napjainkban a májpótló kezelésnek két fő iránya alakult ki: a sejtalapú, úgynevezett bioarteficiális és a nem sejtalapú, úgynevezett arteficiális rendszerek. A bioarteficiális rendszerek élő állati májsejteket vagy emberi májtumorsejteket tartalmaznak. Jellegzetességük, hogy a beteg vérét vagy szeparált plazmáját a májsejteket tartalmazó bioreaktoron áramoltatják át. Elviekben a májműködést ezek a metodikák modellezik a legtökéletesebben, mert a máj szintetizáló- és detoxikálófunkcióját egyaránt pótolják. Jelenlegi formájukban azonban még távol állnak az ideális megoldástól, alkalmazásuk számos immunológiai, infektológiai, onkológiai és financiális problémát vet fel, ezért egyelőre csak kísérleti célra állnak rendelkezésre. Az arteficiális rendszerek a klinikum számára már elérhetőek, bár széles körben még nem terjedtek el. Csak a máj detoxikálófunkcióját pótolják, a szintetikus funkció részben a hiányzó anyagok (plazmaproteinek, alvadási faktorok) szubsztitúciójával pótolható. Idetartozik a hemodiabszorpció, amely az Amerikai Egyesült Államokban terjedt el (liver dialysis unit), valamint a főleg Európában használatos albumindialízis és a legújabban kifejlesztett frakcionált plazmaszeparáció és -adszorpció (FPSA). Az albumindialízis egyszerű módszere a „single pass albumin dialysis” (SPAD), ennek továbbfejlesztett változata a „molecular adsorbent recirculating system” (MARS). Az FPSA high-flux hemodialízissel kiegészített változata a Prometheus-rendszer. Bár a felsorolt módszerek hatásosságát számos kísérleti és klinikai tanulmány támasztja alá, a konzervatív kezeléssel szemben a túlélésre kifejtett előnyös hatásuk bizonyítására még nagy esetszámot felölelő, randomizált, kontrollált vizsgálatok elvégzésére van szükség.

Extracorporeal albumin dialysis

Patients with liver failure still present a high mortality. It can only be significantly improved by the rare resource of liver transplantation. Extracorporeal liver support devices have been developed to temporarily support liver detoxification. Artificial devices without hepatocytes ("liver dialysis" or "albumin dialysis") are already widely used in Europe. The two best-known systems, MARS and Prometheus, use a different technical approach to remove water-soluble as well as albumin-bound toxins from the blood. In MARS, toxins diffuse along a concentration gradient through an albumin-impermeable membrane into a secondary circuit that is pre-filled with an albumin solution. The albumin is continuously "recycled" inside the secondary circuit by different adsorber and low flux dialysis. In contrast, Prometheus includes an albumin-permeable filter allowing separation of the albumin fraction into the secondary circuit where the albumin-bound toxins are directly removed by two adsorbers. Thereafter, high flux dialysis is performed inside the primary circuit. For both extracorporeal systems, an improvement of hepatic encephalopathy and biochemical markers such as bilirubin is consistently reported. In-vivo comparisons of both systems showed significantly higher extraction capacities for protein-bound and water-soluble substances under Prometheus than under MARS treatment. Possible pathophysiological mechanisms could be a reduction of portal pressure or a removal of vasoactive cytokines. However, only few randomised controlled trials with low patient numbers and conflictive results regarding patient survival exist. Nevertheless, a Cochrane meta-analysis revealed a significant survival benefit for extracorporeal liver support devices in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Other promising indications are severe refractory cholestatic pruritus, intoxication with protein-bound substances and graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. As large randomised controlled multi-center trials are currently underway, better evidence will be available soon to define the clinical role of extracorporeal liver support devices.

Acute liver failure including acetaminophen overdose

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a dramatic, highly unpredictable clinical syndrome defined by the sudden onset of coagulopathy and encephalopathy. Acetaminophen overdose, the leading cause of ALF in the United States, has a 66% chance of recovery with early N-acetylcysteine treatment and supportive care. Cerebral edema and infectious complications are difficult to detect and treat in these patients and may cause irreversible brain damage and multiorgan failure. One-year survival after emergency liver transplantation is 70%, but 20% of listed patients die, highlighting the importance of early referral of patients who have ALF with a poor prognosis to a transplant center.

The hepatorenal syndrome

The onset of renal failure in a patient with cirrhosis or acute liver failure is alarming because it raises the possibility of the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Periodic surveillance of renal function is helpful in patients with severe liver disease to detect HRS early and to help correct reversible contributing factors. Once established, HRS responds relatively poorly to medical management, although recent advances have brought hope for an improved prognosis. In this article the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management of HRS are discussed in detail, with an emphasis on recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances.

Liver support devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver support devices are used either as a bridge to liver transplantation or liver recovery in patients with acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure. The review analyzes the recent literature and asks if the current enthusiasm for these devices is justified.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many liver support devices exist and are discussed. Clinical data on artificial devices are rapidly emerging, especially on the molecular adsorbents recirculating system, and fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus). While hepatic encephalopathy is improved by the molecular adsorbents recirculating system and probably Prometheus too, neither system has been shown to improve survival. Less clinical data exist for bioartificial support devices. These may use human hepatocytes, such as the extracorporeal liver assist device, although most devices use porcine hepatocytes, such as HepatAssist.

SUMMARY

Enthusiasm in liver support devices is justified as many nonrandomized studies have suggested some biochemical and clinical benefits. The results of several ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trials are anxiously awaited. Meanwhile, because mortality without liver transplantation remains high despite the use of liver support devices, these devices should only be used in the research setting or by experts proficient in their use and as a bridge to liver transplantation rather than liver recovery.

Bench-to-bedside review: current evidence for extracorporeal albumin dialysis systems in liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure (AoCLF) carry a high mortality. The rationale for extracorporeal systems is to provide an environment facilitating recovery or a window of opportunity for liver transplantation. Recent technologies have used albumin as a scavenging molecule. Two different albumin dialysis systems have been developed using this principle: MARS (Molecular Adsorbent Recirculation System) and SPAD (Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis). A third system, Prometheus (Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption), differs from the others in that the patient's albumin is separated across a membrane and then is run over adsorptive columns. Although several trials have been published (particularly with MARS), currently there is a lack of controlled studies with homogenous patient populations. Many studies have combined patients with ALF and AoCLF. Others have included patients with different etiologies. Although MARS and Prometheus have shown biochemical improvements in AoCLF and ALF, additional studies are required to show conclusive benefit in short- and long-term survival. The appropriate comparator is standard medical therapy rather than head-to-head comparisons of different forms of albumin dialysis.

What's new in the treatment of ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

In recent years, there have been important advances in the clinical management of ascites and its related complications, such as hyponatremia, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Moreover, new drugs are currently being investigated for their potential usefulness in managing these complications. This article is not intended to comprehensively review all the literature published in recent years; rather, the authors discuss only studies they believe represent a potentially significant advance in this field. The following review is divided into two parts; the first discusses ascites and renal function abnormalities, including hyponatremia and HRS, and the second discusses SBP management.

Sorbent-based artificial liver devices: principles of operation, chemical effects and clinical results

Devices for support of patients with liver failure are of two types: bioartificial livers and artificial livers. Bioartificial livers include hepatocytes in bioreactors to provide both excretory and synthetic liver functions. Artificial livers use nonliving components to remove toxins of liver failure, supply nutrients and macromolecules. Current artificial liver devices use columns or suspensions of sorbents (including adsorbents and absorbents) to selectively remove toxins and regenerate dialysate, albumin-containing dialysate, plasma filtrate or plasma. This article reviews three artificial liver devices. Liver Dialysis uses a suspension of charcoal and cation exchangers to regenerate dialysate. MARS uses charcoal and an anion exchanger to regenerate dialysate with albumin. Prometheus uses neutral and anion exchange resins to regenerate a plasma filtrate containing albumin and small globulins. We review the operating principles, chemical effects, clinical effects and complications of use of each type of artificial liver. These devices clearly improve the clinical condition of patients with acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Further randomized outcome studies are necessary to prove clinical outcome benefit of the artificial liver support devices, and define what types of patients appear most amenable to therapy.

The therapeutical efficiency of the newest extracorporal elimination procedure (Prometheus® treatment) in acute liver failure caused by intoxication

Az akut májelégtelenség mortalitása az intenzív terápia ellenére májtranszplantáció nélkül 60–90%. Az átültethető szervek korlátozott száma miatt azonban a betegek jelentős része a várólistán exitál. A mortalitás csökkentése érdekében számos próbálkozás történt a májelégtelenségben felhalmozódó albuminhoz kötött és vízoldékony méreganyagok eltávolítására, elősegítve ezzel a máj spontán regenerációját, illetve a beteg életben tartását a májtranszplantációig. A Prometheus®-kezelés egy viszonylag új technika, a frakcionált plazmaszeparáció és -adszorpció (FPSA) és egy high-flux dialízis kombinációja. Az eljárás során a beteg saját, szeparált, albuminban gazdag plazmája speciális adszorbereken halad keresztül, lehetővé téve az albuminhoz kötött toxinok eliminációját, miközben a vízoldékony toxinok eltávolítása hemodialízissel történik. Célkitűzés: A szerzők szándéka az volt, hogy a Prometheus®-kezelés hatékonyságát igazolják mérgezés okozta akut májelégtelenségben. Betegek és módszer: A Prometheus®-kezelést három, konzervatív kezeléssel nem uralható akut májelégtelenségben szenvedő, súlyos, paracetamol-, káliumpermanganát- és Amanita phalloides-mérgezett beteg esetében alkalmazták. Eredmények: A három nőbetegnél 10 kezelés történt. Súlyos szövődményt nem észleltek. A kezelések során az albuminhoz kötött (indirekt bilirubin p = 0,048; epesav p = 0,001) és a vízoldékony (direkt bilirubin p = 0,002; kreatinin p = 0,007) toxinok szignifikáns csökkenését tapasztalták. Az ammónia, a karbamid, a fibrinogén és az antitrombin III szint szignifikánsan nem változott. Mindhárom beteg májtranszplantáció nélkül meggyógyult. Következtetés: A Prometheus®-kezelés hatékonyan távolítja el az akut májelégtelenségben akkumulálódó toxinokat. Biztonságos eljárás. Konzervatív terápiával nem uralható esetekben lehetővé teszi a beteg életben tartását a máj spontán regenerációjáig vagy a májtranszplantációig.

Technology Insight: artificial extracorporeal liver support—how does Prometheus® compare with MARS®?

Artificial extracorporeal liver support or 'liver dialysis' has been used in patients with severe liver failure with increasing frequency since the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS), a variant of albumin dialysis, was introduced in 1999. Nevertheless, liver dialysis must still be thought of as experimental because its contribution to improved patient survival has not been proven in large randomized trials. Prometheus is a novel device for fractionated plasma separation via an albumin-permeable filter that was developed to improve removal of albumin-bound toxins. Initial studies have proven clinical use of Prometheus to be feasible and safe. Head-to-head comparisons of Prometheus and MARS have shown treatment with the former to be more efficient with respect to removal of most albumin-bound and water-solved markers. As controlled studies with clinical end points are lacking, it is not known whether the observed greater detoxification capacity of Prometheus will translate into clinical benefit; two small studies indicate that there might be a beneficial effect in hepatic encephalopathy and pruritus. In a recent randomized comparison of MARS and Prometheus, however, hemodynamic improvement was observed in response to MARS, but not Prometheus, treatment. A large randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of Prometheus on survival--the HELIOS study--has been initiated. First results are expected in 2008 and will be crucial to establishing a role for Prometheus in the field of extracorporeal liver support.

How can liver toxins be removed? Filtration and adsorption with the Prometheus system

The application of extracorporeal blood circuits in liver failure therapy has its roots in the two functions of the liver, first as a detoxifying and second as a synthetizing organ. In contrast to hydrophilic uremic toxins, most liver toxins are hydrophobic and bind preferentially to blood proteins. Consequently, the majority of these compounds cannot be removed by hemodialysis or similar dialytic procedures. Current systems use albumin as a transport vehicle for hydrophobic compounds across high flux membranes (e.g. albumin-dialysis, molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS)). In contrast to these devices, the Prometheus system (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) applies filtration across highly permeable membranes with a molecular weight cut-off of >300.000. These membranes facilitate a direct filtration of most of the toxin-bearing proteins. In a secondary circuit these toxins are then removed by adsorber beads assembled in specially designed cartridges. The protein-containing toxin-free solution returns to the primary circuit. Clinical testing of the Prometheus system's safety and efficacy parameters showed that cell counts and coagulation factors were not significantly affected. Total bilirubin-, bile acid- and plasma ammonia-levels were reduced in vivo by -21%, -43% and -40%, respectively. First successful therapeutic results have been obtained for patients treated for drug abuse and for patients waiting for transplantation. Thus, a combination of plasma fractionation with highly permeable membranes followed by a secondary circuit with adsorber cartridges proves to be the most effective method of removing toxic waste in liver failure. Further investigations will follow in order to extend the application of the Prometheus system to larger cohorts of patients.

Review article: clinical experience with Prometheus

Prometheus is a new extracorporeal liver support device which facilitates the combined removal of both albumin-bound and water-soluble toxins based upon the method of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA). The pilot trial included 11 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and concomitant renal failure. Prometheus therapy was found to be safe except for a reversible decrease of blood pressure. In three patients, clotting of the secondary system occurred. Prometheus treatment significantly improved blood levels of protein-bound (conjugated bilirubin, bile acids, ammonia) and water-soluble (creatinine, urea) substances. Thus, Prometheus might be a new therapeutic option in patients with severe hepatorenal syndrome. Furthermore, there is some preliminary experience with Prometheus in the treatment of refractory cholestatic pruritus and in successful bridging to liver transplantation. In order to compare extraction capacities of Prometheus and the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), five patients were crossover-treated with both systems. Prometheus resulted in significantly higher reduction ratios of bilirubin, ammonia and urea. Another study closely monitored whether the device causes an unselective removal. Neither important cytokines nor coagulation factors were found to be removed. In conclusion, Prometheus seems to be a new therapeutic option in artificial liver support. A significant improvement of the biochemical milieu was already observed after two treatments. The potential to remove protein-bound and water-soluble substances has been shown without signs of a significant unselective removal.

Treatment of severe refractory pruritus with fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus)

OBJECTIVE

Severe pruritus is a serious complication of cholestatic liver disease. Prometheus is a recently introduced extracorporeal liver support system with direct toxin adsorption of the patient's albumin fraction (FPSA; fractionated plasma separation and adsorption). Here we report on the effect of Prometheus therapy in patients with intractable cholestatic pruritus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seven patients with different liver diseases and severe pruritus refractory to all medical treatment efforts for more than 4 weeks were treated with Prometheus (3-5 times, 18+/-3 h total). Pruritus intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS; from 0 = no pruritus to 10 = unbearable pruritus), and VAS, serum bile acids and total bilirubin were evaluated directly before and after Prometheus treatment, as well as 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

After Prometheus therapy, VAS values had dropped significantly from 9+/-1 to 3+/-3 (p<0.001). Likewise, serum bile acids decreased (from 248+/-192 to 101+/-85 micromol/l; p<0.03). All patients, with the exception of one with no initial bile acid elevation, reported a pronounced improvement in pruritus with Prometheus therapy, although in two anicteric patients the amelioration lasted only a few days. In the other four patients a distinct benefit was still observed 4 weeks after the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Prometheus therapy significantly improved refractory pruritus in all patients with elevated bile acid levels, but in some patients the clinical benefit was of short duration. The clinical findings suggest that we have to better characterize those patients who might derive a long-lasting benefit from this invasive and expensive treatment.

Therapy insight: Management of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a feared complication of advanced cirrhosis, is characterized by functional renal failure, secondary to renal vasoconstriction in the absence of underlying kidney pathology. Extreme underfilling of the arterial circulation, caused by arterial vasodilation of the splanchnic circulation, activates vasoconstrictor systems, which lead to intense renal vasoconstriction and HRS. Factors predictive for the development of HRS include intense urinary sodium retention, dilutional hyponatremia, low blood pressure, decreased cardiac output, and increased activity of systemic vasoconstrictors. The prognosis for patients with HRS is extremely poor, especially for those with the acute, progressive (type 1) form. Liver transplantation is the best treatment for suitable candidates and should always be the management option considered first. Pharmacologic therapies are aimed at improving renal function to enable patients to survive until transplantation is possible. These therapies are based on plasma expansion with albumin, combined with the use of either vasopressin analogs or alpha-adrenergic agonists. Other nonpharmacologic therapies, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and albumin dialysis show promise, but experience with these treatments is limited. For prevention of HRS, albumin infusion is recommended in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and pentoxifylline treatment is recommended in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis.

Hepatorenal syndrome

Among the many causes of renal failure in patients who have advanced liver disease, functional renal failure occurring in the absence of parenchymal kidney disease, better known as hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), is the most frequent cause of renal dysfunction in patients who have cirrhosis. This article focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostic approach, and current treatment of HRS in cirrhosis.