Comparative Effects of Pranidipine with Amlodipine in Rats with Heart Failure

Diabetic cardiomyopathy: molecular mechanisms, detrimental effects of conventional treatment, and beneficial effects of natural therapy

ABSTARCT

Diabetic complications are among the largely exigent health problems currently. Cardiovascular complications, including diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), account for more than 80% of diabetic deaths. Investigators are exploring new therapeutic targets to slow or abate diabetes because of the growing occurrence and augmented risk of deaths due to its complications. Research on rodent models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and the use of genetic engineering techniques in mice and rats have significantly sophisticated for our understanding of the molecular mechanisms in human DCM. DCM is featured by pathophysiological mechanisms that are hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, left ventricular hypertrophy, damaged left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions, myocardial fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, myocyte cell death, autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum stress. A number of molecular and cellular pathways, such as cardiac ubiquitin proteasome system, FoxO transcription factors, hexosamine biosynthetic pathway, polyol pathway, protein kinase C signaling, NF-κB signaling, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling, Nrf2 pathway, mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, and micro RNAs, play a major role in DCM. Currently, there are a few drugs for the management of DCM and some of them have considerable adverse effects. So, researchers are focusing on the natural products to ameliorate it. Hence, in this review, we discuss the pathogical, molecular, and cellular mechanisms of DCM; the current diagnostic methods and treatments; adverse effects of conventional treatment; and beneficial effects of natural product-based therapeutics, which may pave the way to new treatment strategies. Graphical Abstract.

Therapies to limit myocardial injury in animal models of myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Current myocarditis guidelines do not advocate treatment to prevent myocardial injury and scar deposition in patients with myocarditis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to ascertain the utility of beta blockers, calcium channel blockers and antagonists of the renin–angiotensin system in ameliorating myocardial injury, scar formation and calcification in animal in vivo models of myocarditis. The project was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews (CRD42018089336). Primary outcomes (necrosis, fibrosis and calcification) were meta-analysed with random-effects modelling. 52 studies were systematically reviewed. Meta-analysis was performed compared with untreated controls. In each study, we identified all independent comparisons of treatment versus control groups. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) indicated treatment reduced necrosis by 16.9% (71 controlled analyses, 95% CI 13.2–20.7%; P < 0.001), however there was less evidence of an effect after accounting for publication bias. Treatment led to a 12.8% reduction in fibrosis (73 controlled analyses, 95% CI 7.6–18.0%; P < 0.001). After accounting for publication bias this was attenuated to 7.8% but remained significant. Treatment reduced calcification by 4.1% (28 controlled analyses, 95% CI 0.2–8.0%; P < 0.0395). We observed significant heterogeneity in effect size in all primary endpoints, which was predominantly driven by differences between drug categories. Beta blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were the only agents that were effective for both necrosis and fibrosis, while only ACE inhibitors had a significant effect on calcification. This study provides evidence for a role for ACE inhibitors and beta blockers to prevent myocardial injury and scar deposition in in vivo models of myocarditis. There is a need for further well-designed studies to assess the translational application of these treatments.

Established and novel treatment options in acute myocarditis, with or without heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Acute myocarditis is a disorder characterized by an unpredictable clinical course which ranges from asymptomatic, incidentally discovered forms, to cases with fulminant course and adverse outcome. The most challenging issues in the context of acute myocarditis are the appearance of difficult to treat heart failure in the acute phase and the potential progression in the long-term to dilated cardiomyopathy. Areas covered: With respect to available treatment options in acute myocarditis, in the absence of specific guidelines, management is supportive and overall empirical, especially for the oligo- or asymptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction. Haemodynamically instable patients should be treated in referral centers with capability of advanced cardiopulmonary support. Patients with heart failure but without haemodynamic impairment should be treated according to the heart failure guidelines. Endomyocardial biopsy may be performed in an individualized basis both for diagnostic purposes and to guide treatment, based on the detection or not of viral genome. Expert commentary: Apart from the already established treatments, novel therapies against several targets are currently investigated and are expected to contribute to a more efficacious management options in the future. Increased awareness among medical professionals is essential for the early diagnosis and best care of acute myocarditis patients.

Update on myocarditis

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart frequently resulting from viral infections and/or post-viral immune-mediated responses. It is one of the important causes of dilated cardiomyopathy worldwide. The diagnosis is presumed on clinical presentation and noninvasive diagnostic methods such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for in vivo diagnosis of myocarditis. The therapeutic and prognostic benefits of endomyocardial biopsy results have recently been demonstrated in several clinical trials. Although remarkable advances in diagnosis, understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment of acute myocarditis were gained during the last years, no standard treatment strategies could be defined as yet, apart from standard heart failure therapy and physical rest. In severe cases, mechanical support or heart transplantation may become necessary. There is some evidence that immunosuppressive and immunomodulating therapy are effective for chronic, virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Further investigations by controlled, randomized studies are needed to definitively determine their role in the treatment of myocarditis.

Nifedipine inhibits the activation of inflammatory and immune reactions in viral myocarditis

AIMS

The aim of study is to investigate the effect of nifedipine on viral myocarditis in an animal model.

MAIN METHODS

Four-week-old male DBA/2 mice were inoculated with 2 pfu of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and randomized to nifedipine (n=10) or control (n=10) group. The control group was fed by regular chow and the nifedipine group contained 0.01% of nifedipine. Mast cell density was counted, and expressions of messenger RNAs of stem cell factor (SCF), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), pro-collagen I, mast cell proteases, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated by RT-PCR.

KEY FINDINGS

The area of myocardial necrosis was smaller in the nifedipine vs the control group (mean+/-SD, 1.2+/-1.3% vs 3.8+/-1.8%, respectively, P<0.005). The mast cell density (count/mm(2)) was lower in the nifedipine vs the control group (mean+/-SD, 0.23+/-0.16 vs 1.08+/-0.45, respectively, P<0.0005). The expressions of MMPs, mast cell proteases, TNF-alpha, IL-6, SCF and pro-collagen I were lower in the nifedipine group than in the control group (P<0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Nifedipine inhibited the activation of various participants in inflammatory and immune reactions in EMCV myocarditis.