Benefits from the use of a pimecrolimus-based treatment in the management of atopic dermatitis in clinical practice. Analysis of a Swiss cohort

Cancer risk with topical calcineurin inhibitors, pimecrolimus and tacrolimus, for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is a prevalent condition in children and can be effectively managed with medications such as topical calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus or tacrolimus). A key unresolved safety concern is whether use of topical calcineurin inhibitors is associated with cancer. We systematically reviewed the risk of cancer in patients with atopic dermatitis exposed to topical calcineurin inhibitors.

METHODS

As part of the 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters atopic dermatitis guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, the Índice Bibliográfico Espanhol de Ciências da Saúde database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the US Food and Drug Administration database, the European Medicines Agency database, company registers, and relevant citations from inception to June 6, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials and comparative and non-comparative non-randomised studies in any language addressing cancer risk in patients with atopic dermatitis using topical calcineurin inhibitors. We excluded split-body studies and studies with less than 3 weeks of follow-up. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. We used Bayesian models to estimate the probability for cancer due to topical calcineurin inhibitor exposure and the GRADE approach to determine the certainty of the evidence. Patients, advocacy groups, and care providers set a priori thresholds of important effects. This study is registered with Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/v4bfc.

FINDINGS

We identified and analysed 110 unique studies (52 randomised controlled trials and 69 non-randomised studies [11 were non-randomised study extensions of randomised controlled trials]) including 3·4 million patients followed up for a mean of 11 months (range 0·7-120). The absolute risk of any cancer with topical calcineurin inhibitor exposure was not different from controls (absolute risk 4·70 per 1000 with topical calcineurin inhibitors vs 4·56 per 1000 without; odds ratio 1·03 [95% credible interval 0·94-1·11]; moderate certainty). For all age groups and using data from observational studies and randomised controlled trials, the use of pimecrolimus (OR 1·05 [95% credible interval 0·94-1·15]) or tacrolimus (0·99 [0·89-1·09]) is likely to have had little to no association with cancer compared with no topical calcineurin inhibitor exposure. For pimecrolimus versus tacrolimus, the finding was similar (0·95 [95% credible interval 0·83-1·07]). Findings were similar in infants, children, and adults, and robust to trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses.

INTERPRETATION

Among individuals with atopic dermatitis, moderate-certainty evidence shows that topical calcineurin inhibitors do not increase the risk of cancer. These findings support the safe use of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the optimal treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis.

FUNDING

American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology via the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters.

What Is the Risk of Harm Associated With Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors?

The topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus (Protopic) and pimecrolimus (Elidel), were approved in the early 2000s and were widely used as a nonsteroid treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) in adult and pediatric populations. In 2005, the addition of a boxed warning was mandated for TCIs based on a potential risk of malignancy, and there was subsequently a substantial decline in their use. Since then, evidence has mounted to support the safety of this class of medications and suggests that the increased risk of malignancy remains theoretical. This review aims to dispel some of the common myths surrounding the safety of TCIs by evaluating the key evidence regarding their safety and tolerability in adult and pediatric populations. Four major themes are addressed in a practical question-and-answer format: the risk of harm associated with TCIs including common and serious adverse events; warnings and precautions for their use including the risk of systemic absorption, immunosuppression, and malignancy; the comparative safety of TCIs; and suggestions for counselling patients about the risk of harm with TCIs. Based on the available evidence, international professional dermatological organizations and regulatory authorities have concluded that the benefits of TCIs outweigh their potential risks when used in the appropriate patient populations for the recommended duration of time.

Tolerability of Topical Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that is accompanied by increased sensitivity to itch-provoking and pain-provoking stimuli. Patients with AD experience skin pain before initiation of therapy and have also reported painful application site reactions in clinical trials of emollients and prescription topical therapies, including topical corticosteroids (TCSs), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), and a topical phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor. To compare the sensory tolerability of prescription topical therapies for AD, a comprehensive literature search and analysis of published clinical trials was conducted. Sensory tolerability issues such as application site pain, burning, stinging, and pruritus were often among the most common adverse events or treatment-related adverse events in clinical trials for prescription topical therapies. Tolerability issues occurred at highest rates in trials of TCIs, followed by trials of the PDE4 inhibitor crisaborole and TCSs, although direct comparisons are not possible because of differences in study design. Tolerability issues in these clinical trials were generally mild to moderate and transient. This article also reviews published strategies for managing sensory tolerability issues in AD patients during treatment with topical therapies.

Funding: Pfizer Inc., New York, NY.

A Systematic Scoping Literature Review of Publications Supporting Treatment Guidelines for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis in Contrast to Clinical Practice Patterns

INTRODUCTION

Treatment guidelines endorse a variety of strategies for atopic dermatitis (AD) which may vary from published data and clinical practice patterns. The objective of this review was to quantify the volume of available medical literature supporting pediatric AD treatments and compare these patterns to those recommended by published guidelines and/or clinical practice patterns.

METHODS

Searches of Embase (2005-2016) and abstracts from selected meetings (2014-2016) related to AD treatment in patients younger than 17 years of age yielded references that were assessed by study design, primary treatment, age groups, and AD severity.

RESULTS

Published literature partially supports clinical guidelines, with emollients and topical medications being the most investigated. There were disproportionately more publications for topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) compared with topical corticosteroids (TCS); however, the search interval may have biased the results toward treatments approved near the beginning of the time frame. In contrast, publications documenting clinical practice patterns reflect greater use of emollients and TCS (over TCI), as well as systemic corticosteroids. Data is relatively limited for long-term and combination treatment, treatment of severe AD, and patients younger than 2 years of age, and completely lacking for systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review demonstrates that available medical literature largely supports published guidelines for topical therapy; however, clinical practice patterns are less aligned. There is a lack of data for older, more frequently used generic treatments, including oral antihistamines, oral antibiotics, and systemic corticosteroids. Overall, literature is lacking for long-term treatment, treatment for patients younger than 2 years of age, and for systemic treatment for severe disease.

FUNDING

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.

PRINCIPLES THERAPY OF ATOPIC DERMATITIS IN CHILDHOOD IN THE ASPECT OF MODERN CONCEPTS OF THE PATHOGENESIS OF THE DISEASE

The article contains data on the key links in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis in children. The authors of the article have covered modern approaches to topical therapy of atopic dermatitis in children. Modern algorithms of proactive therapy and control over the course of the disease are presented.

Systematic review of published trials: long-term safety of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Many clinicians have concerns about the safety of atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments, particularly in children requiring long-term daily maintenance therapy. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) have been widely used for >5 decades. Long-term TCS monotherapy has been associated with adverse cutaneous effects including atrophy, rebound flares, and increased percutaneous absorption with potential for adverse systemic effects. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, available for 1-2 decades, are not associated with atrophy or increased percutaneous absorption after prolonged use and have much lower potential for systemic effects. However, since 2006 TCIs have carried a controversial Boxed Warning based on a theoretical risk of malignancy (eg, skin and lymphoma) that has limited TCI use for standard-of-care maintenance therapy.

METHODS

A comparative systematic search of PubMed was done for long-term (≥12 week) clinical trials of TCS or TCI treatment in patients <12 years with AD. Citations were reviewed for inclusion based on MeSH terms, abstracts, and relevant article text. Studies were excluded if they did not encompass subjects <12 years, or were <12 weeks' duration, retrospective, meta-analyses, or limited to anecdotal case reports.

RESULTS

Of 27 trials meeting criteria, 21 included 5825 pediatric patients treated with TCIs, and 6 included 1999 patients treated with TCS. TCS studies were limited to low- to mid-potency products, and all but one study lacked a vehicle control. Eight TCI studies were vehicle-controlled, and safety data were well reported, with ≤5 % of patients reporting discontinuation due to adverse effects (DAEs). Cutaneous and systemic adverse events (AEs) were similar in TCI and vehicle groups, with no reports of lymphoma. Safety data in TCS trials were less well reported. DAE incidence was addressed in just 2 trials, and systemic and cutaneous AEs were mostly unreported.

CONCLUSIONS

Data supporting long-term use of TCIs are robust, documenting safety and efficacy, while data supporting long-term TCS use are limited to low- to mid-potency products. Our review identifies a lack of information on the safety of commonly prescribed, long-term monotherapy with mid- to high-potency TCS in pediatric AD, and supports standard-of-care maintenance therapy with TCIs and intermittent use of low- to mid-potency TCS for flares.

Calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic disease characterized by periods of remission and relapse. Therapeutic objectives for AD should be to quickly reduce disease symptoms by targeting pathophysiological pathways, and to provide long-term management by reducing recurrences.

OBJECTIVE

Calcineurin inhibitors currently appear to be one of the most promising alternative systemic and topical compounds to treat AD. This review focuses on new developments of topical calcineurin inhibitors, therapeutic regimens including long-term management, and prophylaxis of AD.

METHODS

The published clinical studies that present data on treatment of AD with calcineurin inhibitors were assessed.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Topical calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus provide an effective treatment for AD. They are useful for long-term management and prophylaxis of AD. Safety concerns with regard to increased risk for lymphomas or skin cancer could not be confirmed but will remain under careful observation.

Steroid-sparing effect of pimecrolimus cream 1% in children with severe atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if pimecrolimus cream 1% reduces the need for steroids in the long-term management of severe pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

A total of 184 pediatric patients (aged 2-17 years) with a history of severe AD according to Rajka and Langeland were enrolled. Patients were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream or vehicle cream for a 24-week period. Prednicarbate 0.25% was applied as rescue medication.

RESULTS

Patients on pimecrolimus required steroids on a mean of 29% of study days, compared with 35% of patients on vehicle (p = 0.1841). On the head and neck only, the respective figures were 10 versus 19% (p = 0.0009). In patients enrolled with acute severe disease (Investigator's Global Assessment > or = 4), steroids were used on 28% of the days in the pimecrolimus group compared to 45% in the control group (p = 0.0024). On the head and neck, steroids were used on 10% of study days with pimecrolimus versus 30% with vehicle (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the need for topical steroids on the head and neck is reduced with pimecrolimus cream 1% in the management of severe pediatric AD according to the definition of Rajka and Langeland.

Extracorporeal photopheresis as a treatment for patients with severe, refractory atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex disease with a variety of possible treatment regimens. The study objective was to demonstrate that methoxsalen used in conjunction with the Uvar XTS photopheresis system (Therakos, Exton, Pa., USA) is safe and can have a clinical effect on the skin manifestations and the quality of life in patients with severe, refractory AD.

METHODS

Single-arm, open-label treatment using the Uvar XTS photopheresis system. Seven patients (4 male and 3 female, median age: 47 years) with severe (SCORAD >45) AD of at least 12 months duration who in the preceding 12 months had been refractory to all 3 of the first-line therapies for AD, i.e. topical steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors and one form of phototherapy (UVA, UVB or PUVA), or to one of the second-line therapies like systemic steroids or cyclosporine were included in the study. Treatment consisted of two extracorporeal photopheresis treatments (ExP) on successive days every 2 weeks for a minimum of 12 weeks to a maximum of 20 weeks. Quality of life assessment was performed with the SF-36 Health Survey and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACT-G Survey. Clinical improvement was documented with SCORAD assessment.

RESULTS

ExP led to a significant decrease in the SCORAD score from 77.7 after 10 cycles to 55.6. Patients reported that they had begun to notice improvement of their skin conditions after 5 cycles of photopheresis. The FACT-G score showed significant improvement from 64.8 to 72.9 (p < 0.05) and the SF-36 Health Survey showed significant improvement in the emotional well-being subscores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ExP can have a significant therapeutic effect on the skin and quality of life improvement in a selected group of patients with severe AD who are refractory to conventional forms of therapy. However, larger studies are needed to further evaluate its therapeutic potential.

Pimecrolimus 1% Cream in Non-Specific Inflammatory Recurrent Balanitis

BACKGROUND

Non-specific balanitis is a common inflammatory dermatosis with frequent relapses and considerable impact on male sexual life.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus 1% cream in recurrent non-specific balanitis.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with recurrent flares of non-specific balanitis were randomly assigned to 1 group applying pimecrolimus cream 1% and 1 group applying placebo on the glans twice daily for 7 days. The patients were assessed on day 14. They were instructed to continue applying the agent whenever symptoms initialized for the following 90 days and take account of the cumulative days with symptoms.

RESULTS

Seven out of the 11 (63.6%) patients in the pimecrolimus group and 1 out of 11 (9%) in the control group were free of all symptoms and lesions after 14 days, 3 (27.3%) in both groups reported improvement, while 1 (9.1%) in the pimecrolimus and 7 (63.6%) in the control group remained unaffected. (chi(2) = 9.0, d.f. = 2, p = 0.011). Days with symptoms during the 90-day follow-up period were 7.50 +/- 3.02 for the pimecrolimus and 17.62 +/- 4.40 for the control group (p = 0.000064).

CONCLUSIONS

Pimecrolimus 1% cream is promising in relieving symptoms and signs of non-specific balanitis during flares and controlling the disease during long-term follow-up.

Atopic Dermatitis: Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients and Their Partners

BACKGROUND

The impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) on the patient's quality of life is relatively well known. However, the influence on the patient's spouse has never been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of AD on the quality of life, sleeping and sexual life of patients and their partners.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients and their partners completed a number of questionnaires asking about their general health and their quality of life [Short Form 12, Epworth, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)] and completed an idiosyncratic measure asking about their sexual functioning. AD severity was clinician rated using Scoring atopic dermatitis (SCORAD).

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients were included. The mean DLQI score was 8.8. The physical and mental composite 12 scores were 50.7 and 39.5, respectively. These 3 scores were significantly related to SCORAD. A decrease in sexual desire due to AD was noted in 57.5% of patients. The quality of life of partners did not appear to be particularly impaired, but 36.5% reported that the appearance of eczema had an impact on their sex life.

CONCLUSION

The influence of AD on sex life is significant both for the patients and their partners.