Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging in non-tumoral hypopituitarism in children

Neonatal Hypopituitarism: Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment

Hypopituitarism is defined as a decreased release of hypophyseal hormones, which may be caused by disease of the pituitary gland disease or hypothalamus. The clinical findings of neonatal hypopituitarism depend on the causes and on presence and extent of hormonal deficiency. Patients may be asymptomatic or may demonstrate non-specific symptoms, but may still be at risk for development of pituitary hormone deficiency over time. Patient history, physical examination, endocrinological, radiological and genetic evaluations are all important for early diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this paper was to present a review of etiological factors, clinical findings, diagnosis and treatment approaches in neonatal hypopituitarism.

Frequent development of combined pituitary hormone deficiency in patients initially diagnosed as isolated growth hormone deficiency: a long term follow-up of patients from a single center

BACKGROUND

Children initially diagnosed with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) have a variable rate to progress to combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) during follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the development of CPHD in a group of childhood-onset IGHD followed at a single tertiary center over a long period of time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 83 patients initially diagnosed as IGHD with a mean follow-up of 15.2 years. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the temporal progression and to identify risk factors to development of CPHD over time.

RESULTS

From 83 patients initially with IGHD, 37 (45%) developed CPHD after a median time of follow up of 5.4 years (range from 1.2 to 21 years). LH and FSH deficiencies were the most common pituitary hormone (38%) deficiencies developed followed by TSH (31%), ACTH (12%) and ADH deficiency (5%). ADH deficiency (3.1 ± 1 years from GHD diagnosis) presented earlier and ACTH deficiency (9.3 ± 3.5 years) presented later during follow up compared to LH/FSH (8.3 ± 4 years) and TSH (7.5 ± 5.6 years) deficiencies. In a Cox regression model, pituitary stalk abnormalities was the strongest risk factor for the development of CPHD (hazard ratio of 3.28; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated a high frequency of development of CPHD in patients initially diagnosed as IGHD at childhood. Half of our patients with IGHD developed the second hormone deficiency after 5 years of diagnosis, reinforcing the need for lifelong monitoring of pituitary function in these patients.

Usefulness of magnetic resonance findings of the hypothalamic-pituitary region in the management of short children with growth hormone deficiency: evidence from a longitudinal study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the hypothalamic-pituitary (H-P) region and response to recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment in short children with growth hormone deficiency, basing on changes of auxologic parameters, as well as to answer the question if MRI may serve for selecting and monitoring the rhGH responders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 85 children treated with rhGH, aged 7.3-18.7 years, followed for the mean period of 3.2 years (range, 2.1-9.5 years). Auxologic parameters (height deficit hSDS, deviation from the mid-parental height hSDS-mpSDS, bone delay index bone age/chronological age ratio (BA/CA)) were assessed before, during and at the end of rhGH treatment; growth velocity was calculated before and during rhGH therapy. Parameters were correlated with the MRI of the H-P region.

RESULTS

Structural anomalies of the H-P region were found in 22 (25.9%) children: empty sella syndrome (ESS) in 12 (14.1%) patients, ectopic posterior pituitary (EPP) in ten (11.8%). Patients' height deficit and their deviation from parental height before rhGH therapy was significantly greater in the EPP group (median hSDS = -3.8; hSDS-mpSDS = -2.5), bone age delay was the greatest in the ESS group (median BA/CA = 0.69), after therapy - in the EPP group (median BA/CA = 0.82). Growth velocity improved in the first year of the rhGH therapy in all groups; however, the most significant acceleration was observed in the EPP group (median delta hSDS = 0.9), then stabilised and was comparable in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI may be helpful in predicting response to the rhGH treatment, providing midline abnormalities are taken into account.

Can auxology, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements followed by MRI and genetic tests replace GH stimulation tests in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in children?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

GH levels < 10 ng/ml in response to two different GH stimulation tests (GHSTs) are traditionally used to identify children with GH deficiency (GHD). Since GHSTs are imprecise, other diagnostic tools have been proposed. We assessed whether auxology, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements followed by brain MRI and genetic analysis can replace the current diagnostic approach.

METHODS

Fifty-three children diagnosed with GHD by two different GHSTs. GH-1 gene was sequenced.

RESULTS

At presentation, 17% of patients were with height above -1.5 SD and 28% above -2.0 SD; 50% had IGF-1 concentration above -1.5 SD and 58% above -2.0 SD; 59% had pituitary anomalies demonstrated by MRI. Fourteen patients harbored the heterozygous R183H mutation, one patient had the N47D mutation and one had a novel F25Y mutation in GH-1. Using cut-off levels of -1.5 SD for height, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 excluded the diagnosis of GHD in 17, 68 and 79% of the children, respectively; a cut-off of -2 SD excluded 28, 88 and 96%, respectively. Further brain MRI and genetic tests excluded 81-96% and 96-100%, respectively, of children currently diagnosed with GH.

CONCLUSION

Use of the tested approach, which avoids carrying out two GHSTs, would exclude most children currently diagnosed with GHD. Until better tools become available, we recommend identifying GHD in children by an integrated approach combining phenotype, auxological parameters, hormonal measurements and two separate GHSTs, with MRI and genetic tests to support the diagnosis.

Genetic forms of hypopituitarism and their manifestation in the neonatal period

The anterior pituitary gland is a central regulator of growth, reproduction and homeostasis. The development of the pituitary gland depends on the sequential temporal and spatial expression of transcription factors and signalling molecules. Naturally occurring and transgenic murine models have demonstrated a role for many of these molecules in the aetiology of congenital hypopituitarism. These include the transcription factors HESX1, PROP1, POU1F1, LHX3, LHX4, PITX1, PITX2, OTX2, SOX2 and SOX3. Mutations in any of the genes involved in pituitary development may result in congenital hypopituitarism, which manifests as the deficiency in one or more pituitary hormones. The phenotype can be highly variable and may consist of isolated hypopituitarism, or more complex disorders such as septo-optic dysplasia (SOD) and holoprosencephaly. Neonates with congenital hypopituitarism may present with non-specific symptoms, with or without associated developmental defects such as ocular, midline and genital abnormalities. Alternatively, they may be initially asymptomatic but at risk of developing pituitary hormone deficiencies over time. The overall incidence of mutations in known transcription factors in patients with hypopituitarism is low, indicating that many genes remain to be identified. Their characterization will further elucidate the pathogenesis of this complex condition and will shed light on normal pituitary development.

[Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism]

Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is defined by reduced steroid hormone synthesis and secretion due to low LH and FSH secretion. It is a rare disease with an unknown prevalence (about 1/5000). It results from a fetal defect in GnRH neuron migration, a defect of pituitary development or from a functional defect of the hypothalamopituitary axis between GnRH neurons and gonadotropic cells. The diagnosis should be considered at birth in males with micropenis, during adolescence in case of delayed puberty or absent puberty, and during adulthood in case of infertility. It may be restricted to the gonadotropic axis, combined with other endocrine system defects or be part of a complex syndrome. Several gene defects have now been described. Molecular studies should be performed to confirm the diagnosis and to help provide appropriate genetic counseling. Treatment to induce puberty should be provided at adolescence, followed by hormonal substitution treatment during adulthood. Specific infertility treatment may also be proposed but patients with the dominant form of gonadotropic deficiency should be informed of the risk of transmission.