The mode of innervation following thalamotomy and subthalamotomy

Subthalamotomy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: clinical aspects and mechanisms of action

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition that can be pharmacologically treated with levodopa. However, important motor and nonmotor symptoms appear with its long-term use. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is known to be involved in the pathophysiology of PD and to contribute to levodopa-induced complications. Surgery is considered in patients who have advanced PD that is refractory to pharmacotherapy and who display disabling dyskinesia. Deep brain stimulation of the STN is currently the main surgical procedure for PD, but lesioning is still performed. This review covers the clinical aspects and complications of subthalamotomy as one of the lesion-based options for PD patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Moreover, the authors discuss the possible effects of subthalamic lesioning.

THE POSTERIOR SUBTHALAMIC AREA IN THE TREATMENT OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS

THE INTRODUCTION OF thalamotomy in 1954 led naturally to exploration of the underlying subthalamic area, with the development of such procedures as campotomy and subthalamotomy in the posterior subthalamic area. The most popular of these procedures was the subthalamotomy, which was performed in thousands of patients for various movement disorders. Today, in the deep brain stimulation (DBS) era, subthalamic nucleus DBS is the treatment of choice for Parkinson's disease, whereas thalamic and pallidal DBS are mainly used for nonparkinsonian tremor and dystonia, respectively. The interest in DBS in the posterior subthalamic area has been quite limited, however, with a total of 95 patients presented in 14 articles. During recent years, interest has increased, and promising results have been published concerning both Parkinson's disease and nonparkinsonian tremor. We reviewed the literature to investigate the development of surgery in the posterior subthalamic area from the lesional era to the present.

Neuromodulation of prelemniscal radiations in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), tetrapolar electrodes were implanted in the prelemniscal radiations (RAPRL) to treat tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia. Fifteen patients were implanted unilaterally and five patients bilaterally and followed-up for one year. The selection criteria included the presence of unilateral pronounced tremor and rigidity in patients implanted unilaterally or bilateral symptoms including severe bradykinesia in patients implanted bilaterally. In the operating room, the tremor decreased significantly or was abolished following the insertion of the electrode in the RAPRL. This effect was temporary and subsided when the stimulation was off. However, when the stimulator was turned on, the severity of the symptoms and signs decreased significantly. The post-implantation MRI confirmed that the electrode contacts used for stimulation were inserted in RAPRL, a group of fibers located between the red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus, above the substantia nigra, medially to the zona incerta and below the thalamus. The patients were evaluated using the UPDRS part III, before implantation and every 3 months during the first year. Global scores decreased significantly. The pre- and postoperative median values (range in round brackets) were as follows: tremor improved from 3 (2-16) to 1 (2-3) (p<0.001); rigidity was either abolished or decreased markedly from 2 (1-16) to 0 (0-4) (p< 0.001); bradykinesia improved from 2 (0-4) to 1 (0-2) (p<0.001). We conclude that RAPRL, an area anatomically different from STN, is a good target for electrical stimulation in order to treat effectively all the main symptoms of PD.

Lesion therapy for Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders: Update and controversies

An analysis of the international literature on lesioning for movement disorders was undertaken to review lesion therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other movement disorders and to highlight important controversies surrounding this surgical technique. Lesions have been placed throughout the neuraxis with varying approaches and success. Our understanding of the pathophysiological basis underlying the development of PD and other movement disorders has led to a better understanding of why lesioning certain portions of the nervous system should improve motor function. Advances in imaging technology and electrophysiological techniques used for localization of brain structures, such as microelectrode mapping, have improved the ability to accurately identify and lesion target structures deep in the brain. This improvement has led to an increase in the degree and consistency of clinical benefit. The major controversies in lesion therapy include: (1) which target for which disorder; (2) determination of the optimal lesion site and whether the external globus pallidus (GPe) should be included in the pallidotomy lesion for PD; (3) determination of the size of the lesion; (4) whether bilateral lesions can be placed without the high incidence of side effects reported by some investigators; (5) whether microelectrodes aid in the ability to improve clinical outcomes or increase the risk of side effects by making multiple microelectrode penetrations; (6) whether the subthalamic nucleus (STN) should be explored further as a lesioning target; and (7) whether lesioning should be abandoned entirely in favor of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Many important questions and controversies regarding lesion therapy remain unanswered. It is unlikely given the pro-DBS environment that these questions will be answered in the near future. We should, however, be careful not to abandon an effective therapy before fully exploring through randomized trials the relative effect of different surgical approaches for the treatment of patients with movement disorders.