Advancements in Diagnosis and Multimodal Treatment Strategies for Retroperitoneal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs) encompass both benign and malignant entities, constituting ~0.1% to 0.2% of all malignant tumors, of which 70% to 80% manifest malignancy. Predominantly, retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent the most prevalent subtype among RPT. With over 70 histologic forms identified, liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas emerge as the primary constituents of RPS. Accurate diagnosis of RPTs necessitates preoperative core-needle biopsy and comprehensive imaging assessment. The current staging protocol for RPS relies on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification. Surgical excision remains the established gold standard for treating RPS. Therapeutic approaches vary according to the underlying pathophysiology. Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy exhibit efficacy in managing metastatic and recurrent unresectable RPS, their role in primary RPS remains unresolved, necessitating further clinical trials for validation. Concurrently, ongoing research explores the potential of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research, delineating diagnostic pathways and optimal therapeutic strategies for RPT.

A Phase II Study of Gemcitabine, Vincristine, and Cisplatin As Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (aSTS) typically have a poor prognosis. Patients progressing to doxorubicin-based regimen have limited therapeutic options. Monotherapy with cytotoxic drugs appears to have only modest activity in the second-line setting. The purpose of this phase II study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination regimen with gemcitabine, vincristine, and cisplatin (GVP) as a salvage treatment for patients with aSTS.Eligible patients were female with 18∼75 years old, and had aSTS that had progressed after 1 prior anthracyclines-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients were treated with 1,000 mg/m gemcitabine intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8, 1.4 mg/m (max 2 mg) vincristine IV on day 1 and 25 mg/m cisplatin IV on days 1 through 3 every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), over response rate (ORR) and safety. This trial was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT01192633).A total of 26 patients with a median age 47 years (21-72) were recruited. ORR was 23.1% [1 complete response and 5 partial responses]. The median PFS and OS were 4.8 (95% CI, 0.1-9.5) months and 15.0 (95% CI, 6.1-23.9) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (34.6%), leukopenia (23.1%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%) and anemia (3.8%). No febrile neutropenia and grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred. The most frequent non-hematologic toxicities were nausea/vomiting (50.0%), fatigue (30.8%), and fever (11.5%).We conclude that GVP regimen is effective with a favorable safety profile as the second-line chemotherapy in aSTS patients, which warrants further investigation in a phase III study.

Cost effectiveness of first-line treatment with doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy in the management of advanced soft tissue sarcoma in Italy, Spain, and sweden

Background. Doxorubicin/ifosfamide is a first-line systemic chemotherapy for the majority of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) subtypes. Trabectedin is indicated for the treatment of ASTS after failure of anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide; however it is being increasingly used off-label as a first-line treatment. This study estimated the cost effectiveness of these two treatments in the first-line management of ASTS in Italy, Spain, and Sweden. Methods. A Markov model was constructed to estimate the cost effectiveness of doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy, defined as the cost per QALY gained, in each country. Results. First-line treatment with doxorubicin/ifosfamide resulted in lower two-year healthcare costs and more QALYs than first-line treatment with trabectedin monotherapy in all three countries. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a cost per QALY threshold of €35,000, >90% of a cohort would be cost effectively treated with doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy in all three countries. Conclusion. Within the model's limitations, first-line treatment of patients with ASTS with doxorubicin/ifosfamide instead of trabectedin monotherapy affords a cost-effective use of publicly funded healthcare resources in Italy, Spain, and Sweden and is therefore the preferred treatment in all three countries. These findings support the recommendation that trabectedin should remain a second-line treatment.

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with previously treated advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel and fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with previously treated advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced soft tissue or bone sarcoma, previously treated with ifosfamide and anthracycline-based chemotherapies, were treated with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2) over 60 min) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) over 100 min) on days 1 and 8 of every 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

From September 2008 to August 2010, 30 patients were enrolled; 24 (80.0%) were men and median patient age was 45 years (range 17-70 years). The patients received a total of 136 cycles of therapy (median 4 cycles per patient; range 1-15 cycles). Of these 30 patients, none achieved complete response (CR) and 5 achieved a partial response (PR), making the overall response rate 16.7% (95% CI, 2.5-30.8%). Twelve patients had stable disease (SD), resulting in tumor control (CR or PR or SD) in 17 of 30 patients (56.7%). Median progression-free survival was 2.5 months (range 0.8-15.3 months), and median overall survival was 8.4 months (range 1.4-22.3 months). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were observed in 17 (56.7%), 13 (43.4%), and 4 (13.3%) patients, respectively. None of these patients, however, had febrile neutropenia or bleeding events, and all non-hematologic toxicities were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly docetaxel and fixed dose rate gemcitabine was tolerable and may be an active regimen in patients with previously treated advanced sarcoma.

Outcomes of single-centre experience of hepatic resection and cryoablation of sarcoma liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Liver metastasis from sarcoma in metastatic disease is common and its effect on prognosis remains ill defined. Surgery remains paramount in sarcoma management; however, there is inadequate literature reporting the role of hepatic surgery as treatment for sarcoma liver metastases.

METHODS

Fifteen patients who underwent hepatic resection for metastatic sarcoma between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2009 were identified from a prospective hepatobiliary database. Clinicopathologic, operative, recurrence, and long-term survival data are presented.

RESULTS

Three patients had synchronous liver metastases. The median time to developing liver metastasis was 26 (range, 0-206) months. The overall median survival from hepatic resection of liver metastasis was 103 (95% confidence interval, 6-200) months with a 5- and 10-year survival of 51% and 37%, respectively. The median disease-free survival from hepatic resection was 14 (95% confidence interval, 11-18) months. CD117 positive tumors was associated with an improved survival with a 3-year survival of 80% compared with 33% in CD117 negative tumors (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection for sarcoma liver metastases with or without extrahepatic disease is a reasonable management strategy if a complete resection may be achieved. Concomitant treatment of CD117 positive tumors with imatinib leads to long-term survival.

Phase I study of gemcitabine, docetaxel and imatinib in refractory and relapsed solid tumors

PURPOSE

In a phase I study, the combination of gemcitabine and imatinib was well tolerated with broad anticancer activity. This phase I trial evaluated the triplet of docetaxel, gemcitabine and imatinib.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Imatinib was administered at 400 mg daily on days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19. Gemcitabine was started at 600 mg/m(2) at a rate of 10 mg/min on days 3 and 10 and docetaxel at 30 mg/m(2) on day 10, on a 21-day cycle. Diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI was performed in selected patients.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors were enrolled in this IRB-approved study. The mean age was 64, and mean ECOG PS was 1. Two patients were evaluated by diffusion/perfusion MRI. After two grade 3 hematological toxicities at dose level 1, the protocol was amended to reduce the dose of imatinib. MTDs were 600 mg/ m(2) on days 3 and 10 for gemcitabine, 30 mg/ m(2) on day 10 for docetaxel, and 400 mg daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 for imatinib. Dose limiting toxicities after one cycle were neutropenic fever, and pleural and pericardial effusions. The best response achieved was stable disease, for six cycles, in one patient each with mesothelioma and non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the MTD. Two patients with NSCLC had stable disease for four cycles.

DISCUSSION

An unexpectedly low MTD for this triplet was identified. Our results suggest drug-drug interactions that amplify toxicities with little evidence of improved tumor control.

Cancer treatments: can we find treasures at the bottom of the sea?

Because of the poor results observed after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, research on new strategies for second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is warranted. Current research focuses on the development of new agents and the assessment of a combination of therapies, especially those with different mechanisms of action. PM02734 (elisidepsin, Irvalec) is a compound related to Kahalalide F (KF), a moderately soluble marine product that belongs to a family of dehydro aminobutyric acid-containing peptides isolated from the herbivorous marine mollusk Elysia rufescens. Preclinical and clinical studies showed that KF induces strong cytotoxic activity against different solid tumors, including NSCLC, particularly in patients with squamous histology; in fact, almost 40% of patients treated in the second line were still alive at 1 year after beginning treatment with KF. Analysis of data collected during clinical development has revealed that KF has a predictable and manageable toxicity profile. The toxicities most commonly associated with KF are generally transient and mild or moderate. The absence of hematologic toxicity and cumulative toxic effects suggests that KF may be suitable for combination trials with other anticancer agents. The development of KF could stopped because of the unavailability of a natural source of the compound. PM02734 is a closely related derivative of KF with similar activity and characteristics. Herein, we summarize the studies of PM02734 and future clinical perspectives.