1
|
A Comparative Update on the Neuroendocrine Regulation of Growth Hormone in Vertebrates. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:614981. [PMID: 33708174 PMCID: PMC7940767 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.614981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Growth hormone (GH), mainly produced from the pituitary somatotrophs is a key endocrine regulator of somatic growth. GH, a pleiotropic hormone, is also involved in regulating vital processes, including nutrition, reproduction, physical activity, neuroprotection, immunity, and osmotic pressure in vertebrates. The dysregulation of the pituitary GH and hepatic insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) affects many cellular processes associated with growth promotion, including protein synthesis, cell proliferation and metabolism, leading to growth disorders. The metabolic and growth effects of GH have interesting applications in different fields, including the livestock industry and aquaculture. The latest discoveries on new regulators of pituitary GH synthesis and secretion deserve our attention. These novel regulators include the stimulators adropin, klotho, and the fibroblast growth factors, as well as the inhibitors, nucleobindin-encoded peptides (nesfatin-1 and nesfatin-1-like peptide) and irisin. This review aims for a comparative analysis of our current understanding of the endocrine regulation of GH from the pituitary of vertebrates. In addition, we will consider useful pharmacological molecules (i.e. stimulators and inhibitors of the GH signaling pathways) that are important in studying GH and somatotroph biology. The main goal of this review is to provide an overview and update on GH regulators in 2020. While an extensive review of each of the GH regulators and an in-depth analysis of specifics are beyond its scope, we have compiled information on the main endogenous and pharmacological regulators to facilitate an easy access. Overall, this review aims to serve as a resource on GH endocrinology for a beginner to intermediate level knowledge seeker on this topic.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chapter 3 Diseases Associated with Growth Hormone‐Releasing Hormone Receptor (GHRHR) Mutations. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2009; 88:57-84. [DOI: 10.1016/s1877-1173(09)88003-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
3
|
Abstract
Lewis dwarf (dw/dw) rats exhibit growth hormone (GH) deficiency and growth retardation linked to a malfunction of GHRH signaling. In this study, GHRH-receptor (GHRH-R) binding and mRNA in the pituitary of adult male dw/dw and age-matched normal Lewis rats was measured by radioligand binding assay and real-time PCR. Only one of nine pools of dw/dw pituitary membranes revealed detectable binding of [His(1), 125I-Tyr(10), Nle(27)]hGHRH(1-32) amide (B(max); 4.3 fmol/mg protein). In contrast, GHRH-R binding was 22.4 +/- 2.60 fmol/mg protein in normal Lewis rats. mRNA for GHRH-R was detectable in all dw/dw rat pituitaries examined, averaging 21% that of Lewis rats. Low expression of GHRH-R reflects reduced GHRH-R mRNA as well as a possible reduction in translation of the receptor protein.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
To understand the capacity of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) to regulate expression of the GHRH receptor, we studied the effects of GHRH on GHRH receptor mRNA expression in immature and adult rats by use of pituitary cell culture and immunoneutralization approaches. Pituitary cell cultures from neonatal (2-day-old) and adult (70-day-old) rats were treated with GHRH for 4, 24, or 72 h. The effect of GHRH on GHRH receptor mRNA expression depended on the duration of GHRH exposure in both age groups; short-term (4 h) GHRH treatment significantly reduced GHRH receptor mRNA expression (P < 0.05), whereas intermediate treatment (24 h) restored GHRH receptor mRNA to basal levels, and long-term treatment (72 h) stimulated GHRH receptor mRNA expression (P < 0.02). The long-term stimulatory effect of GHRH on GHRH receptor mRNA expression required the presence of serum in the culture medium, and, in the absence of serum, the stimulatory effect was completely abolished. Moreover, the capacity of the pituitary to increase GHRH receptor mRNA expression in response to 72-h GHRH treatment was age dependent, with neonatal pituitaries exhibiting a much greater stimulatory effect than adult pituitaries (P < 0.025). Immunoneutralization of endogenous GHRH significantly reduced GHRH receptor mRNA expression in neonatal (P < 0.004), juvenile (P < 0.003), and mature (P < 0.004) pituitaries compared with age-matched controls. Taken together, these results indicate that GHRH is a potent regulator of GHRH receptor gene expression in immature and mature pituitaries; however, the nature and direction of GHRH regulation of its receptor depend significantly on several variables, including the duration of GHRH exposure, the presence of permissive components in serum, and the developmental stage of the pituitary.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The pattern of long-term GHRH administration capable of stimulating GH release without depleting pituitary GH content has been investigated using two experimental approaches. In experiment 1, recently weaned male lambs were treated for 3 weeks as follows: Group A) control; B) subcutaneous (sc) continuous infusion of GHRH (1200 mg/day) using a slow release pellet; C) the same as B plus 1 daily sc injection of long acting somatostatin (SS) (octreotide, 20 mg) ; D) 3 daily sc GHRH (250 mg) injections ; E) 2 daily sc injections of GHRH (250 mg) and 2 of natural SS (250 mg). In experiment 2, recently weaned male lambs were continuously GHRH-treated using sc osmotic minipumps (900 mg/day) alone or combined with a daily sc injection of octreotide (20 mg) for 4 weeks. Basal plasma GH levels were increased after chronic pulsatile GHRH treatment but not after any kind of continuous GHRH administration. This increment was maintained during the 3 weeks of experimentation and appeared accompanied by a pituitary GH content similar to controls. A marked GH response to the iv GHRH challenge was observed in controls and in lambs receiving both types of continuous sc GHRH infusions, whereas pulsatile sc GHRH-treated animals did not respond to the iv GHRH challenge in the first and second weeks of the study but did so in the third week of treatment. These data demonstrate that long-term pulsatile GHRH administration is capable of stimulating GH release in growing male lambs, without producing pituitary desensitization.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Repeated stimulation of pituitary cell cultures with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) results in diminished responsiveness, a phenomenon referred to as homologous desensitization. One component of GHRH-induced desensitization is a reduction in GHRH-binding sites, which is reflected by the decreased ability of GHRH to stimulate a rise in intracellular cAMP. In the present study, we sought to determine if homologous down-regulation of GHRH receptor number is due to a decrease in GHRH receptor synthesis. To this end, we developed and validated a quantitative RT-PCR assay system that was capable of assessing differences in GHRH-R messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in total RNA samples obtained from rat pituitary cell cultures. Treatment of pituitary cells with GHRH, for as little as 4 h, resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in GHRH-R mRNA levels. The maximum effect was observed with 0.1 and 1 nM GHRH, which reduced GHRH-R mRNA levels to 49 +/- 4% (mean +/- SEM) and 54 +/- 11% of control values, respectively (n = three separate experiments; P < 0.05). Accompanying the decline in GHRH-R mRNA levels was a rise in GH release; reaching 320 +/- 31% of control values (P < 0.01). Because of the possibility that the rise in medium GH level is the primary regulator of GHRH-R mRNA, we pretreated pituitary cultures for 4 h with GH to achieve a concentration comparable with that induced by a maximal stimulation with GHRH (8 micrograms GH/ml medium). Following pretreatment, cultures were stimulated for 15 min with GHRH and intracellular cAMP accumulation was measured by RIA. GH pretreatment did not impair the ability of GHRH to induce a rise in cAMP concentrations. However, as anticipated, GHRH pretreatment (10 nM) significantly reduced subsequent GHRH-stimulated cAMP to 46% of untreated controls. These data suggest that GHRH, but not GH, directly reduces GHRH-R mRNA levels. To determine whether this effect was mediated through cAMP, cultures were treated with forskolin, a direct stimulator of adenylate cyclase. Forskolin (10 microM) significantly reduced GHRH-R mRNA concentrations (37 +/- 6% of control values) indicating that GHRH acts through the cAMP-second messenger system cascade to regulate GHRH-R mRNA. The somatostatin analogue, octreotide (10 nM), which has been previously reported to decrease adenylate cyclase activity, did not affect GHRH-R mRNA levels. Taken together, these results indicate that GHRH inhibits the production of its own receptor by a receptor-mediated, cAMP-dependent reduction of GHRH-R mRNA accumulation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is secreted by corticotrophic cells in pulsatile bursts. This paper reviews the extant literature on the phenomenon of pulsatile ACTH after addressing basic issues of hormone pulsatility in neuroendocrine systems. The following themes emerged from reviewing 51 studies measuring plasma ACTH at intervals of 20 min or less: marked inter-individual variability in the pattern of ACTH, the dependence of pulse identification on sampling frequency, the similarity in ACTH pulse amplitude and frequency across species, and the predominance of amplitude over frequency changes in ACTH pulses in altered physiological states. As the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis plays a critical role in orchestrating adaptation and survival, the ability to modulate the shape of ACTH signals may prove to be an important means of transmitting complex information to ACTH responsive cells. The clinical and neurobiological significance of temporal alterations in ACTH secretion represents an area for future investigation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Effect of chronic administration of a new potent agonist of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 on linear growth and GH responsiveness in rats. REGULATORY PEPTIDES 1996; 65:197-201. [PMID: 8897642 DOI: 10.1016/0167-0115(96)00099-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The effects of a repeated or continuous administration of a potent agonistic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH), [Dat1, Thr8, Orn12,21, Abu15, Nle27, Asp28, Agm29] hGH-RH(1-29)(JI-36), on the linear growth and the GH responses to bolus injections of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 were investigated in male rats about 7 weeks old. Body weight and tail length were monitored. Basal serum GH and IGF-I concentrations and GH responses to GH-RH(1-29)NH2 were measured by RIA. Chronic administration of GH-RH agonist JI-36 by continuous release from osmotic minipumps at the rate of 0.2 microgram/h or twice daily injections of 0.5 and 5 micrograms/rat for 4 weeks significantly speeded up the growth of rats as measured by the tail length. The acceleration of growth was similar in the 3 groups and was associated with stimulation of IGF-I secretion. The GH response to bolus injection of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 was preserved in all groups and no attentuation of the response occurred in rats treated for 4 weeks with agonist JI-36 as compared with the control group. Our results indicate that chronic administration of GH-RH agonist JI-36 significantly increases the growth rate without affecting somatotroph responsiveness in rats. It is therefore likely that this class of GH-RH agonists may be useful clinically.
Collapse
|
9
|
Effects of long-term infusion of growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor on pulsatile GH secretion in the male rat. Life Sci 1994; 54:79-86. [PMID: 8277821 DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00777-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The effects of long-term infusion of GRF on pulsatile GH secretion were investigated in conscious, freely-moving male rats. GH-releasing factor (GRF) was intravenously administered for 14 days using an osmotic minipump. Six-hour iv infusion of 0.5 microgram/h GRF significantly increased mean GH concentration in the conscious rats. In contrast, 14-day iv infusion of 0.5 microgram/h GRF significantly inhibited pulsatile GH secretion. The pituitary GH content was significantly increased by the 14-day treatment. The GH response to bolus injection of 1 microgram GRF under urethane anesthesia was enhanced by the 14-day infusion of GRF. Pretreatment with somatostatin (SS) antiserum did not restore the inhibited GH secretion in rats treated with 14-day infusion of GRF. These results suggest that neither pituitary GH depletion nor high somatostatin tone is involved in the GRF-induced GH inhibition.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Acute recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) administration (1-250 micrograms/kg; IP) decreased locomotor activity (LA) in a dose-dependent manner, F(5, 43) = 3.55, p < 0.009, with maximum effect at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg [control = 1655 +/- 659 inputs/outputs (I/O); r-hGH = 909 +/- 436 I/O; p < 0.05]. The daily treatment with r-hGH (10 micrograms/kg/day; 5 days; IP) reduced LA counts during the first trial, with no apparent changes in motor behavior after habituation. In contrast, growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF; 10 micrograms/rat/day; 5 days; IP) enhanced LA (control = 1045 +/- 566 I/O; GRF = 2284 +/- 894 I/O; p < 0.01) during the 5-day treatment period, inhibiting habituation. Moreover, the individual differences in LA persisted during the treatment period in response to GRF or r-hGH, but not in control rats. These results seem to indicate that the effects of GRF on LA are not mediated by the release of peripheral GH, and suggest that GRF might influence psychomotor behavior by a central mechanism.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Suppressed pulsatile GH secretion in food-deprived rats has been hypothesized to be due to an increase in hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. We investigated this hypothesis and the role of GHRH in regulating GH secretion during food deprivation using two different models. In experiment one, rats were food deprived for 72h during which time they received a saline infusion (n = 5). At the same time rats were normal fed for 72h during which time they received a somatostatin infusion (5 micrograms/h, n = 7). After the 72h infusion period, all rats received two iv injections of GHRH (1 microgram/rat) at 2h intervals. GH concentrations in food-deprived rats rose from approximately 10 ng/ml to 400-800 ng/ml in response to both GHRH injections. This increase was significantly greater (p < 0.01) than the GH response (100-400 ng/ml) observed in somatostatin-infused animals. The significantly higher GH response observed in food-deprived rats as compared to somatostatin-infused, normal-fed rats suggests that somatostatin concentrations may decrease during food deprivation. In experiment two, rats were infused for 5h with either saline (n = 6) or GHRH (10 micrograms/h, n = 9) at the end of a 72h fast. GH concentrations did not change in saline-infused animals. In contrast, GH concentrations significantly increased (p < 0.01) upon initiation of the continuous GHRH infusion. Yet, this release of GH was pulsatile in nature. Pulsatile GH secretion in the presence of a constant GHRH infusion suggests that pulsatile somatostatin release from the hypothalamus is maintained during food deprivation. These studies suggest that during food deprivation in the rat 1) absolute concentrations of somatostatin decrease, but its pattern of secretion remains pulsatile, and 2) decreased GHRH release may be responsible for the absence of spontaneous GH pulses.
Collapse
|
12
|
Autoradiographic demonstration of in vivo 125I-growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) binding by human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas transplanted on athymic nude mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1992; 85:157-64. [PMID: 1634014 DOI: 10.1016/0303-7207(92)90254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
This study was designed for the purpose of investigating a method for in vivo tumor labelling of human GH (hGH) secreting pituitary adenomas. Pituitary adenoma tissue removed from four acromegalic patients was transplanted into 62 athymic nude mice. After positive GHRH stimulation tests 125I-GHRH(1-44) NH2 was injected intravenously (i.v.) in ten nude mice. 10 min after 125I-GHRH injection, the nude mice were sacrificed, the transplants excised and prepared for light microscopical autoradiography. The mouse pituitary and skeletal muscle specimens served as controls. After the i.v. injection of 125I-GHRH we observed a marked accumulation of silver grains within the adenoma tissue indicating tumor labelling. This study is a first step in investigating a new method for labelling small residues of hGH secreting pituitary adenomas intraoperatively.
Collapse
|
13
|
Effects of somatostatin on the growth hormone-releasing factor-induced growth hormone secretion in rats with electrical and chemical inhibitions of endogenous growth hormone-releasing factor and somatostatin. J Neuroendocrinol 1990; 2:555-61. [PMID: 19215388 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1990.tb00447.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Abstract The episodic pattern of growth hormone (GH) secretion of the male rat was simulated in rats exhibiting impaired GH-releasing factor (GRF) and Somatostatin (SRIF) secretion, by administering various combinations of human GRF-(1-44)NH(2) (hGRF) and SRIF. Electrical lesions of the arcuate nucleus resulted in a marked decrease in the amplitude of GH secretory bursts, while the administration of cysteamine (200 mg/kg) did not change the GH secretory profile in rats with arcuate nucleus lesions. Immunohistochemical examinations revealed a marked decrease of GRF and SRIF immunoreactivity in the median eminence of the cysteamine-treated rats with arcuate nucleus lesions. The intravenous injection of 5 mug of hGRF every 3 h caused equivalent surges of GH in the cysteamine-treated rats with arcuate nucleus lesions. The additional infusion of 4 mug/h of SRIF during the trough periods of GH secretion did not affect the amplitude of the GH surges. Hourly injection of 5 mug of hGRF caused transient desensitization to hGRF. Interestingly, the additional infusion of 4 mug/h of SRIF every 3 h enhanced the amplitude of the GH bursts induced by the fourth and the seventh hGRF injections. However, the more frequent injection of 5 mug of hGRF every 30 min caused constant desensitization to hGRF with time, and the additional infusion of 4 mug/h of SRIF every 3 h did not change the attenuated responses to hGRF. These results indicated that the simultaneous administration of hourly GRF and continuous SRIF with brief pauses was most effective for producing high GH peaks. This simulation model suggests that SRIF may play an important role not only in the production of GH troughs, but also in the maintenance of GH surges with distinct peaks in the male rat.
Collapse
|
14
|
The effects of a growth hormone-releasing Peptide and growth hormone-releasing factor in conscious and anaesthetized rats. J Neuroendocrinol 1989; 1:249-55. [PMID: 19210437 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1989.tb00112.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Abstract The growth hormone (GH) releasing ability of GH-releasing factor (GRF) and a GH-releasing hexapeptide, CHRP, have been studied in anaesthetized and conscious male and female rats. The GH responses to GHRP in anaesthetized rats were inconsistent, and this peptide was much less potent than GRF. Continuous iv infusions of GRF or GHRP both caused an initial GH release which was not maintained, and further GH release could be elicited by injection of GRF during an infusion of GHRP and vice versa. In contrast, conscious rats were much more sensitive to GHRP. Infusions of GHRP or GRF both caused an initial GH release. With GRF infusions, GH release continued in the normal episodic pattern whereas with GHRP infusion, GH secretion remained elevated over baseline and the normal pulsatile rhythm was disrupted. Plasma GH levels fell after stopping GHRP infusion, without an immediate resumption of normal GH pulsatility. Conscious male rats responded intermittently to injections of GRF given iv every 45 min, but when such serial injections of GRF were given during a continuous iv infusion of GHRP, the GH responses to GRF became regular and more uniform. These results suggest that GHRP prevents the normal cyclic refractoriness to GRF in male rats by disrupting cyclic somatostatin release. The greater potency of GHRP in conscious rats may also depend on the release of endogenous GRF since passive immunization with an anti-GRF serum reduced the plasma GH response to GHRP infusion. Thus in the conscious animal, GHRP may release GH by complex actions at both a hypothalamic and pituitary level.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The effects of GRF-induced desensitization of somatotropes on GH gene expression were investigated on pituitary cells derived from male rats. Pretreatment of monodispersed cells for 18 hr with GRF abolished both the acute release of GH and the stimulation of GH gene expression in response to a subsequent 4 hr challenge with GRF. Concomitant preincubation with GRF and SS resulted in restoration of the ability of GRF to stimulate release of GH but not to augment GH gene expression. These results demonstrate that desensitization by GRF affects both the release of GH and GH gene expression, whereas the resensitizing effects of SS appear to be directed exclusively at the release mechanism.
Collapse
|
16
|
Periodic interactions of GH-releasing factor and somatostatin can augment GH release in vitro. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY 1987; 253:E508-14. [PMID: 2891301 DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1987.253.5.e508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Growth hormone (GH) is secreted as pulses in vivo. To understand the signals governing this periodicity, we have established a perifusion-based model of pulsatile GH release. Male rat anterior pituitaries were dispersed and perifused with pulses of human growth hormone-releasing factor-(1--40) (GHRF), with or without a continuous or discontinuous somatostatin tonus. An experiment was composed of a 1-h base-line collection followed by four 3-h cycles; each contained single or paired 10-min infusion(s) of 3 nM GHRF. In testing the impact of somatostatin, the protocol was identical except that 0.3 nM somatostatin was added 30 min into the base-line period and then was either continued throughout the study or withdrawn during the periods of GHRF infusion. GH base lines with somatostatin were lower than vehicle base lines (P less than 0.05). GHRF pulses generated consistent peaks of GH release between 200 and 300 ng. min-1. (10(7) cells)-1, and these peaks were not altered by continuous somatostatin. In contrast, withdrawal of somatostatin during GHRF administration elicited markedly higher GH peaks (P less than 0.05) and more total GH release (P less than 0.05). This response could not be accounted for by the additive effects of GHRF and somatostatin withdrawal.
Collapse
|
17
|
Effect of long-term administration of an analog of growth hormone-releasing factor on the GH response in rats. Life Sci 1987; 40:2437-44. [PMID: 2884550 DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(87)90759-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The effect of the repeated or continuous administration of an analog of GH releasing factor (GH-RF), D-Tyr-1, D-Ala-2, Nle-27, GH-RF(1-29)-NH2 (DBO-29), on the subsequent response to this peptide was investigated in pentobarbital-anesthetized male rats. A sc administration of this analog induced a greater and more prolonged GH release than doses 10 times larger of GH-RF(1-29). The GH increase after sc injection of 10 micrograms/kg bw of the analog was greater than that induced by iv administration of 2 micrograms/kg bw of GH-RF(1-44). Pretreatment with 10 micrograms/kg bw of the analog did not affect the pituitary response to a strong stimulus (20 micrograms/kg bw) of GH-RF(1-44), 24 h later. Pretreatment with the analog in doses of 10 micrograms/kg bw, sc twice a day, 5 days per week for 4 weeks, significantly diminished the GH release in response to a sc injection of the analog (10 micrograms/kg bw), as compared to vehicle-pretreated controls (P less than 0.01). On the other hand, a continuous sc administration of 0.4 micrograms/h of the analog to intact rats for 7 days did not result in a decrease in GH response to a sc injection of the analog (10 micrograms/kg bw). Since the rats injected repeatedly with the analog for 4 weeks still showed a marked, although somewhat reduced response, analogs of this type may be useful clinically.
Collapse
|