Effect of probucol on hyperlipidemia in patients with nephrotic syndrome

Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with renal disease

A growing number of clinical trials have examined the effects of different lipid lowering strategies in patients with renal disease. We carried out a meta-analysis to compare and contrast the relative efficacy of various antilipemic therapies in different renal disease settings. Studies that investigated one or more therapies designed to lower serum lipids were combined using weighted multiple linear regression. The analysis adjusted treatment effects for differences in baseline lipid levels and possible placebo effects. The results showed that antilipemic therapies generally had similar effects on lipids in different renal disease settings. In nephrotic syndrome the greatest and most consistent reductions in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were seen with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (regression coefficient with 95% confidence interval in mg/dl = -63, -79 to -46). Similar results were seen for LDL in renal transplant (-51, -57 to -45), renal insufficiency (-62, -82 to -42), hemodialysis (-65, -80 to -50) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (-84, -104 to -64). Fibric acid analogues had less effect on LDL, but caused greater reductions in triglycerides: -132, -178 to -87, in nephrotic syndrome; -69, -93 to -45 in transplant: -107, -169 to -45 in renal insufficiency; -72, -120 to -24 in hemodialysis; and -96, -162 to -30 in CAPD. In general, the effects of diet and other therapies were less consistent. Despite possible limitations of this meta-analysis, the results provide a useful framework for choosing antilipemic therapy, and point to areas for future long-term studies examining the safety and efficacy of lipid lowering strategies in patients with renal disease.

The role of lipids in nephrosclerosis and glomerulosclerosis

Hyperlipidemia and lipoprotein abnormalities are often encountered in patients with nephrotic syndrome or chronic renal disease and also in those undergoing haemodialysis and with renal transplant. Even though the significance of lipid deposition in renal tissue and the role of lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of renal disease in man is unclear, experimental and clinical data indicate a possible damaging effect of a disturbed lipid metabolism on the kidney. In humans, glomerular lipid deposition is observed in genetic diseases such as Fabry's disease, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity (LCAT) deficiency and arteriohepatic dysplasia, and in diseases with acquired disturbance of lipid metabolism such as nephrotic syndrome and cholestatic liver disease. Studies on animals with lupus nephritis, aminonucleoside nephrosis, reduced renal mass, diabetes mellitus or systemic hypertension have shown that cholesterol can increase the incidence of glomerulosclerosis. As most of these studies have been performed in the rat, which has a different lipoprotein profile to that of man, these results should be carefully interpreted with regard to their relevance for humans. In vitro cell culture studies on human glomerular cells have given some preliminary insights into the cellular mechanisms of lipid induced glomerular damage. Apo E-containing lipoproteins, which are pathologically elevated in many renal diseases, are avidly taken up by human mesangial cells. These cells seem to play a central role in the initiation of glomerulosclerosis by inducing proliferation and production of excess extracellular matrix. Lipoproteins are able to stimulate DNA synthesis in these cells, and increase the synthesis of mitogens and extracellular matrix protein. The pathogenic role of oxidized lipoproteins has not yet been defined. Human mesangial cells do not seem to take up these modified lipoproteins. However, macrophages infiltrate glomeruli and may constitute the stimulus for the generation of minimally modified lipoproteins and their cellular uptake. The data from animal experiments suggest that treatment that corrects hyperlipidemia may have an ameliorative effect on renal function. Thus, there are strong indications that lipoproteins may play a critical role in mediating the development of glomerulosclerosis.

Lipid abnormalities in the nephrotic syndrome: causes, consequences, and treatment

Hyperlipidemia so commonly complicates heavy proteinuria that it has come to be regarded as an integral feature of the nephrotic syndrome (NS). Characteristically, total plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels are elevated, as are very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Although high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations may be normal, HDL subtypes are abnormally distributed, with a reduction of HDL2 and an increase in HDL3. In addition, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] levels may be elevated. The mechanisms underlying these abnormalities are multifactorial, involving both increased rates of lipoprotein synthesis and defective clearance and catabolism of circulating particles. Although recent dietary and therapeutic studies have demonstrated that nephrotic hyperlipidemia can be effectively treated, the need for such intervention has not been clearly established. This pattern of lipoprotein abnormality is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population, and several studies have suggested that nephrotic individuals are more likely to develop atherosclerosis. However, no prospective trials have evaluated the relationship between deranged lipid metabolism and coronary or cerebral artery disease in patients with NS. In addition, although recent experimental studies suggest that lipid abnormalities may accelerate renal injury and that lipid-lowering agents may protect renal function, there is little current evidence to suggest that such intervention is of value in preserving residual renal function in humans. Further studies are clearly required to assess the potential long-term benefits of lipid-lowering intervention in individuals with NS. In the meantime, based on data generated from other population groups, a rational approach to the clinical management of hyperlipidemia in these patients is presented.

Hyperlipidemia in childhood nephrotic syndrome

Hyperlipidemia is an important characteristic of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Elevation of plasma total cholesterol, or more specifically low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, is the major lipid abnormality in NS, although hypertriglyceridemia may develop as the disorder progresses. The pathophysiology of nephrotic hyperlipidemia is complex. The prevailing view is that both hepatic synthesis of lipids and of apolipoproteins is increased, and that the clearance of chylomicrons and very low-density lipoproteins is reduced. The precise contribution of increased lipogenesis and decreased lipid catabolism to hyperlipidemia, and their relationship to urinary protein loss, hypoalbuminemia and reduced serum oncotic pressure remain controversial. There are two potential risks of elevated plasma lipids: atherosclerosis and progression of glomerular injury. Although neither of these complications has been proved with certainty, there is growing evidence that both may be long-term consequences of NS. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of lipid abnormalities, important aspects of the management of nephrotic children, is summarized here to provide pediatric nephrologists with an informed choice.

The increased risk of coronary heart disease associated with nephrotic syndrome

Patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) are believed to be at increased risk of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease (CHD), although existing evidence for this association has not been persuasive. The risk of CHD among 142 persons with NS documented by protein-uria > or = 3.5 g daily was compared with that among 142 matched controls randomly selected from the membership of a large Northern California health plan. Controls were matched for sex, year of birth, and presence in the health plan when the referent case was diagnosed. No diabetics were included in this study. Mean follow-up for nonfatal CHD events was 5.6 years for NS subjects and 11.2 years for controls. Among the NS subjects myocardial infarction (MI) developed in 11, and there were 58 deaths, seven because of CHD. Among the controls, there were four MIs and 10 deaths, three because of CHD. In matched-pair analysis, there were 11 MIs among NS subjects and none among controls [P = 0.001, lower bound of 95% confidence interval for relative risk (CI), 2.8]. In an unmatched analysis adjusted for hypertension and smoking at diagnosis of NS, the relative risk of MI was 5.5 (95% CI 1.6 to 18.3) and the relative risk of coronary death was 2.8 (95% CI 0.7 to 11.3). Omitting data of NS subjects with minimal change disease and systemic lupus erythematosus yielded similar results. These data suggest that persons with NS are at increased risk of CHD.

Treatment of hyperlipidemia in the nephrotic syndrome: the effects of pravastatin therapy

The hyperlipidemia of the nephrotic syndrome is characterized by an elevation of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), with a normal or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and an increase in triglycerides (TGs) later in the course of the disease. If sustained, this lipid profile probably places these patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Despite extensive trials of diet and drug therapy in patients with primary hyperlipidemias, few such trials exist in patients with the nephrotic syndrome. We conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of pravastatin, the newest cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, in the treatment of the hyperlipidemia of the nephrotic syndrome. After dietary modification was implemented, 13 patients received pravastatin and eight received placebo. All patients were maintained on a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet for the duration of the trial (24 weeks). The dose of pravastatin was increased from the initial 20 mg/d to 40 mg/d at week 10 or 18 if TC remained elevated (> 50th percentile). A bile acid sequestrant was added at week 18 if TC remained elevated and if the patient was already receiving the maximal pravastatin dosage. Dietary modification did not significantly change the lipid profile. Pravastatin (20 mg/d) reduced TC by 22% from a baseline of 301 +/- 28 mg/dL (P < 0.05) and LDLC by 28% from a baseline of 222 +/- 28 mg/dL (P < 0.05). When used at 40 mg/d (in six patients) no further change in the lipid profile was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lovastatin retards the progression of established glomerular disease in obese Zucker rats

Considerable experimental evidence indicates that hyperlipidemia can induce glomerular injury. The importance of lipids in the progression of established glomerular disease has not been established and is of clinical relevance because of the frequent association of lipid abnormalities with human renal disease. In the present study, 26-week-old hyperlipidemic obese Zucker rats (OZRs) with established nephropathy were treated for a period of 18 weeks with daily injections of the cholesterol synthesis inhibitor lovastatin (4 mg/kg). Compared with control OZRs treated with vehicle, lovastatin-treated OZRs had significantly (P < 0.05) lower serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels throughout the treatment period. Blood pressure and urine albumin excretion in lovastatin-treated OZRs were reduced over the first 12 weeks of therapy, but increased toward the levels in the control OZRs at the end of the protocol. After 18 weeks of therapy, the incidence of glomerulosclerosis in lovastatin-treated OZRs (23.2% +/- 5.8%) was approximately half of that in vehicle-treated OZRs (44.6% +/- 7.7%) (P < 0.05). The reduction in glomerular injury in lovastatin-treated OZRs was not associated with changes in either glomerular area or glomerular macrophage content. In separate experiments, mesangial cells were cultured from glomeruli isolated from 26-week-old proteinuric OZRs. Lovastatin (5 to 40 mumol/L) caused a significant dose-dependent inhibition of serum-stimulated mesangial cell DNA synthesis. The inhibitory effects of lovastatin were completely prevented in the presence of exogenous mevalonate (100 mumol/L). Thus, lovastatin retarded the progression of established glomerular disease in OZRs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A clinical overview of dyslipidemias: treatment strategies

The strong epidemiologic relationship between specific lipoprotein levels (such as elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and the future development of coronary heart disease has been well documented. Within the past several years, landmark clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that the incidence of coronary heart disease events is reduced when lipoprotein abnormalities are corrected via pharmacologic therapy. These findings have prompted clinicians to become more vigilant with regard to recognition of dyslipidemias and institution of treatment. This review focuses on the more common primary and secondary dyslipidemias and the currently available lipid-lowering therapies for each disorder. Results of recent coronary angiographic trials are discussed, and implications for the medical management of established coronary heart disease are assessed.

Lipid changes in the nephrotic syndrome: new insights into pathomechanisms and treatment

The abnormalities of lipid metabolism in nephrotic syndrome consist in an increase in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoproteins B (ApoB), C-II and C-III, associated in patients with heavier or marked hypoalbuminemia with an increase in triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, while the high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are distributed abnormally (increased HDL3 fraction and decreased HDL2 fraction) and the Apo A-I to Apo B ratio is reduced. Both increased hepatic lipoprotein synthesis and reduced removal capacity contribute to this hyperlipidemia. Proteinuria may lead to the lipoprotein abnormalities through stimulation of VLDL synthesis by the liver induced by hypoalbuminemia, although it has been more recently suggested that urinary protein loss is associated with the urinary loss of some important cofactor for the regulation of lipid synthesis or catabolism. Treatment of lipid abnormalities in patients with long-lasting heavy proteinuria is mandatory, because they may cause or contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis, but also because they appear to accelerate progression of renal disease by favouring mesangial sclerosis. Four groups of lipid-lowering drugs have been tested: 1) bile acid-binding resins; 2) fibric acid; 3) probucol; 4) inhibitors of HMG CoA reductase. The drugs of the last group appear to be effective and safe in short-term experiments, but long-term studies are necessary to confirm their validity. A dietary approach, consisting in a strictly vegetarian soy diet, very rich in poly- and monounsaturates fatty acids, has been recently tested by the author, with very promising results.

[Pathophysiology and therapy of lipid metabolism disorders in kidney diseases]

Nephrotic syndrome, uremia, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation are accompanied by alterations in lipoprotein metabolism In nephrotic patients, total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL and triglycerides are elevated, while HDL may be increased, normal, or decreased. The pathophysiology includes increased hepatic synthesis of VLDL and cholesterol, decreased activity of lipoprotein lipase, and increased urinary excretion of HDL. The risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) is increased in nephrotic patients and elevated LDL-cholesterol may contribute to this risk. Cholesterol lowering diet and drugs are indicated. Presently, Lovastatin and Simvastatin are the most potent cholesterol lowering drugs in nephrotic patients with good evidence of long-term safety. Most patients with impaired renal function or on hemodialysis have moderate hypertriglyceridemia due to decreased lipoprotein lipase activity. HDL may be slightly decreased. Although the risk of CHD is increased in these patients, triglyceride lowering drugs are not indicated, since no benefit can be expected. Peritoneal dialysis is accompanied by elevated VLDL in addition to hypertriglyceridemia. Reabsorption of large amounts of glucose from peritoneal dialysis fluid increases the carbohydrate load and stimulates hepatic VLDL synthesis. Cholesterol lowering therapy may be advantageous, but the experience is very limited. Side effects of lipid lowering drugs may be aggravated in renal failure. Total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides are elevated in 50% of patients following renal transplantation. Corticosteroids and cyclosporin are major causes of hyperlipidemia. Cholesterol lowering therapy is indicated since the incidence of CHD is increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Probucol: pharmacology and clinical application

Increased levels of cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and VLDL-cholesterol are known risk factors for the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Probucol is an orally active agent that can reduce total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol. The drug also reduces HDL-cholesterol. However, it may modify the lipoprotein in such a way that removal of cholesterol from peripheral tissues is still enhanced. Probucol also has antioxidant activity, which may inhibit the oxidative modification of LDL that contributes to lipid deposition in blood vessel walls. Probucol is a well tolerated agent. However, its ability to prolong life in human subjects still needs to be determined.

The effects of lovastatin in hyperlipidemic patients with the nephrotic syndrome

Hypercholesterolemia may pose a substantial risk for cardiovascular disease. The present investigation was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, lovastatin, in 13 nephrotic patients with 5.6 +/- 0.7 g/24 h of albuminuria. All patients were maintained on a low cholesterol diet throughout the study. After a 4-week placebo period, lovastatin was administered, 20 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. Lovastatin reduced total cholesterol by 27% from 8.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/L (331 +/- 24 mg/dL) to 6.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/L (242 +/- 17 mg/dL) (P less than 0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 27%, from 5.8 +/- 0.5 mmol/L (223 +/- 20 mg/dL) to 4.2 +/- 0.6 mmol/L (163 +/- 22 mg/dL) (P less than 0.01), and apolipoprotein B by 29%, from 153 +/- 12 mg/dL to 109 +/- 8 mg/dL to 109 +/- 8 mg/dL P less than 0.01). Triglycerides and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels were also reduced by 30% and 37%, respectively (P less than 0.01). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and apolipoproteins A-1 and A-2 were not significantly altered. Renal function and urine protein excretion were not affected by lovastatin. Although one patient developed diarrhea and discontinued treatment before completing 6 weeks of lovastatin, the other 12 patients had no adverse effects. In this short-term study, lovastatin therapy had few side effects and had favorable effects on the lipoprotein profile of nephrotic syndrome patients.

Treatment of nephrotic hyperlipoproteinemia with gemfibrozil

Hypercholesterolemia is a known complication of the nephrotic syndrome. Patients with persistent proteinuria and prolonged hypercholesterolemia are probably at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Until recently there has been no safe and effective treatment for this disorder. The effects of gemfibrozil on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic patients with the nephrotic syndrome were therefore studied. Eleven patients with the nephrotic syndrome were studied in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with six-week treatment periods. Gemfibrozil 600 mg or placebo was administered twice a day. There was a third unblinded period in which seven patients received gemfibrozil plus the bile acid-binding resin, colestipol, 10 grams twice a day. Gemfibrozil treatment produced a marked reduction in plasma triglyceride (51%, P = 0.001) and a 15% decrease in plasma total cholesterol (P = 0.003). Low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased 13% (P greater than 0.05), high density lipoprotein cholesterol increased 18% (P = 0.006) and the ratio of low density lipoprotein to high density lipoprotein cholesterol fell 26% (P = 0.01). Apolipoprotein A-l was unchanged while apolipoprotein B decreased 26% (P = 0.006). Four patients were unable to complete period 3 because of gastrointestinal symptoms. The remaining patients had further improvement in plasma lipids and lipoproteins with the combined therapy: total cholesterol further decreased 26%, triglycerides decreased 17%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased 36%, high-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol fell 33%. Gemfibrozil improved lipid and lipoprotein cardiovascular risk factors without major toxicity. Persistent elevations in total plasma and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol during gemfibrozil treatment, however, indicate the need for individualized drug therapy.

Probucol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in hypercholesterolaemia

Probucol is a lipid-regulating agent structurally dissimilar to other known agents, with a unique pharmacodynamic and clinical profile. It is effective in the treatment of primary Type IIa and IIb hyperlipoproteinaemias, including polygenic (non-familial) hypercholesterolaemia and both heterozygous and homozygous forms of familial hypercholesterolaemia, with reductions in plasma total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels of about 10 to 20% being attained. Marked effects on cutaneous and tendinous xanthomas have been observed, with significant regression often apparent after 2 or 3 months' therapy. Preliminary trials also indicate efficacy in hyperlipoproteinaemia secondary to nephrotic syndrome and diabetes mellitus. The mechanism of the reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels is yet to be fully elucidated, but it is thought that the decrease results from enhanced catabolism, and there is preliminary evidence of an independent antioxidant effect. In contrast with all other known lipid-lowering agents, probucol also effects a consistent reduction in serum high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels, of around 20 to 30%; the clinical significance of this observation is unclear, although some preliminary investigations suggest a beneficial effect in enhancing reverse cholesterol transport. The influence of probucol treatment on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remains to be fully investigated; a large trial quantifying the potential effect of probucol against the development of atherosclerotic lesions is currently in progress. Adverse effects of probucol are generally mild, seldom requiring treatment withdrawal, with gastrointestinal effects such as diarrhoea predominating. However, indications of an increased frequency of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in association with QT interval prolongation in some animals have prompted some concern. Although there is evidence of a degree of QT prolongation in a number of trials in humans, the nature and clinical significance of this effect requires clarification, as no increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias is apparent. Thus, probucol appears to be of benefit in primary and secondary hyperlipoproteinaemia of Types IIa and IIb, and particularly in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, with marked effects on xanthomas, and a generally favourable adverse effect profile. There is no evidence to date causally relating occasional QT interval prolongation in patients to any incidence of arrhythmias or sudden death. Pharmacodynamic investigations are likely to clarify further the place of probucol in therapy, particularly with respect to its distinctive lowering of plasma HDL-cholesterol levels.

Effects of simvastatin and cholestyramine on lipoprotein profile in hyperlipidaemia of nephrotic syndrome

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of simvastatin (20 mg twice a day) in the treatment of hyperlipidaemia due to unremitting nephrotic syndrome was compared with that of cholestyramine (8 g twice a day) in a crossover trial in ten patients. Two patients were taken off the protocol, one because he could not tolerate cholestyramine and one because of non-compliance with the cholestyramine regimen. No clinical or laboratory adverse experiences were noticed during the study in the other eight patients. Simvastatin was significantly more effective than cholestyramine in reducing the hyperlipidaemia--it produced a 36% decrease in total cholesterol and a 39% decrease in low density (LDL)-cholesterol, whereas cholestyramine reduced total cholesterol by 8% and LDL-cholesterol by 19%. With simvastatin the apolipoprotein B level decreased by 30%, whereas the apolipoprotein A level increased by 10%.