Acute renal failure due to rifampicin treatment

Modulatory and regenerative potential of transplanted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on rifampicin-induced kidney toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Anti-tuberculosis agent rifampicin is extensively used for its effectiveness. Possible complications of tuberculosis and prolonged rifampicin treatment include kidney damage; these conditions can lead to reduced efficiency of the affected kidney and consequently to other diseases. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) can be used in conjunction with rifampicin to avert kidney damage; because of its regenerative and differentiating potentials into kidney cells. This research was designed to assess the modulatory and regenerative potentials of MSCs in averting kidney damage due to rifampicin-induced kidney toxicity in Wistar rats and their progenies. BMMSCs used in this research were characterized according to the guidelines of International Society for Cellular Therapy.

METHODS

The rats (male and female) were divided into three experimental groups, as follows: Group 1: control rats (4 males & 4 females); Group 2: rats treated with rifampicin only (4 males & 4 females); and Group 3: rats treated with rifampicin plus MSCs (4 males & 4 females). Therapeutic doses of rifampicin (9 mg/kg/day for 3-months) and MSCs infusions (twice/month for 3-months) were administered orally and intravenously respectively. At the end of the three months, the animals were bred together to determine if the effects would carry over to the next generation. Following breeding, the rats were sacrificed to harvest serum for biochemical analysis and the kidneys were also harvested for histological analysis and quantification of the glomeruli size, for the adult rats and their progenies.

RESULTS

The results showed some level of alterations in the biochemical indicators and histopathological damage in the rats that received rifampicin treatment alone, while the control and stem cells treated group showed apparently normal to nearly normal levels of both bio-indicators and normal histological architecture.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of MSCs yielded sensible development, as seen from biochemical indicators, histology and the quantitative cell analysis, hence implying the modulatory and regenerative properties of MSCs.

Hypersensitivity reactions to rifampin. Pathogenetic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, management strategies, and review of the anaphylactic-like reactions

Many of the adverse events induced by rifampin have been considered allergic in origin. The flu-like syndrome and other hypersensitivity reactions seem to be caused by immune complexes, although their pathogenetic mechanisms are not fully elucidated. Many cases have been reported of the flu-like syndrome, thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and renal failure caused by rifampin. In almost all of the patients in whom they were sought, nonreaginic antirifampin antibodies were detected. On the other hand, anaphylactic reactions seem to be IgE-mediated. We have analyzed the 18 reported cases of anaphylactic reactions severe enough to cause marked hypotension. The interval between the onset of treatment and the anaphylactic reaction was highly variable. Most patients presented with prodromes, mainly rash, before the development of anaphylactic symptoms, and, in most cases, the reaction occurred after reexposure to rifampin. Clinical findings include a variety of symptoms, such as fever, exanthem, dyspnea, abdominal pain, and vomiting. Seven of the 9 patients in whom HIV status was known were seropositive, including the only 2 patients who died. We believe that, in case of a non-life-threatening adverse reaction caused by immune complexes, rifampin could be readministered, if necessary, at a more frequent and reduced dose, perhaps with the addition of corticosteroids. In case of anaphylactic reactions the drug should be avoided, although desensitization procedures may be useful. Certain laboratory findings may serve as a clue to predict anaphylactic reactions in patients who have experienced minor adverse events to rifampin. However, the diagnostic value of such findings is not well established and, therefore, patients with previous adverse reactions should be carefully monitored if reexposure to rifampin is essential.

Evaluation of clinical and histological prognostic markers in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis

We analyzed the case records of 19 patients diagnosed to have drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis to assess the clinical profile and role of steroids in renal recovery, and to correlate histological features to outcome. Patients with underlying glomerular diseases, malignancy, obstructive nephropathy, or systemic infections were excluded. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone accounted for 6 cases (group A), whereas antibiotics were the major offender in the remaining patients (group B). In 13/19 (69%) cases, renal failure was severe enough to require dialytic support. Overall 14/19 (74%) of the patients recovered normal renal function within 6 weeks of withdrawal of the offending drugs. Neither the extent of renal recovery nor the time required for it was altered by oral steroids. Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis adversely affected renal recovery. Oliguria, tubular necrosis, interstitial edema, and the density/distribution of interstitial infiltrate did not have any effect on the rate/extent of renal recovery.