Renal transplantation in asymptomatic carriers of hepatitis B surface antigen

Systematic review of hepatocellular carcinoma mortality rates among hepatitis B virus-infected renal transplant recipients, with supplemental analyses of liver failure and all-cause mortality

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review was to compare the mortality rates for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-seropositive renal transplant (RT) patients versus HBsAg-seropositive persons of the general population.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed to identify cohort studies of HBsAg-seropositive RT patients with at least 4 years of follow-up. Data were analyzed as outlined below. HCC was a rare event in regions of low and intermediate seroprevalence of HBsAg. Subsequently, studies from low and intermediate seroprevalence areas were analyzed separately from those of high seroprevalence areas.

RESULTS

Thirty-one retrospective studies that followed 1277 seropositive RT patients were identified for inclusion. The studies were pooled and compared to four different general population studies that included 12558 seropositive persons using Poisson methods. The mortality rate of HCC was increased in low and intermediate seroprevalence areas (RR 7.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.93-15.0; RR 9.92, 95% CI 5.38-18.3). In high seroprevalence areas, the mortality rate of HCC was increased compared to one population study, but not another (RR 2.76, 95% CI 1.64-4.63; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.61-1.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality due to HCC was increased in low and intermediate seroprevalence areas, but the evidence was inconclusive for high seroprevalence areas.

HBsAg seropositive status and survival after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of observational studies

The natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after renal transplantation (RT) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the published medical literature on the impact of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity on survival of RT recipients. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality and graft loss in HBsAg positive RT recipients across the published studies. We identified six observational studies (6050 unique patients); all of them being cohort, retrospective studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated that HBsAg in serum was an independent and significant risk factor for death after RT; the summary estimate for relative risk was 2.49 with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 1.64-3.78. A test for homogeneity of the relative risk across the studies gave a p-value of <0.0001. HBsAg seropositivity was an independent and significant risk factor for graft failure after RT; the summary estimate was 1.44 with a 95% CI of 1.02-2.04 (homogeneity test, p <0.0001). This meta-analysis shows that HBsAg positive RT recipients have an increased risk for mortality and graft failure compared to seronegative patients.

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and oncogenesis. Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses after transplantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, quantitative molecular tests allow the individualization of antiviral therapies for prevention and treatment of infection. This advance is most prominent in the management of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses. Diagnostic advances have not been accompanied by the development of specific and nontoxic anti-viral agents or effective antiviral vaccines. Vaccines, where available, should be given to patients as early as possible and well in advance of transplantation to optimize the immune response. Studies of viral latency, reactivation, and the cellular effects of viral infection will provide clues for future strategies in prevention and treatment of viral infections.

Cadaveric renal transplantation in hepatitis B antigen–positive recipients using hepatitis B antigen–positive donor organs with lamivudine treatment

Although renal transplantation has been regarded as the best renal replacement therapy in end-stage renal disease patients, there have never been enough organ donors. Therefore, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients are often given priority over HBsAg-positive patients. We performed cadaveric renal transplantation in six HBsAg-positive recipients given HBsAg-positive donor organs who were on lamivudine treatment. Donors were found to have normal renal function by serum and urine laboratory tests. All recipients underwent liver biopsies before transplantation; those with liver cirrhosis were excluded. All recipients were treated with 100 mg lamivudine once daily because of positive titers of hepatitis B viral (HBV) DNA (three patients), and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (three patients). During the follow-up period, one patient died from hepatic failure at 50 months after transplantation without deterioration of graft function. The remaining five patients showed sustained normal ALT levels. Decreases in HBV DNA titer were observed among patients who were positive before transplantation, but did not reverse to negative. Acute rejection developed in two patients: one was treated successfully with steroid pulse therapy, and the other had two bouts of acute rejection within a 33-month interval. The first was successfully treated with steroid pulse therapy, but the second failed. The four remaining patients have maintained normal renal function for a considerable time. HBsAg-positive donor organs must be used carefully in renal transplantation of HBsAg-positive recipients.

Excellent outcome of Lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic renal failure and hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and renal transplant recipients. Lamivudine (3TC) has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication. It appears to be safe and effective in patients with CRF, though experience is still limited. We describe 4 patients with CRF on hemodialysis who showed a rapid and full response to 3TC, administered for a median of 10 months. All patients had serum alanine transferase (ALT) levels 3 to 6 times the upper limit of normal prior to treatment, and different degrees of histologic inflammatory activity (Knodell score 4 to 8, median 6). All were serum HBsAg- and HBeAg-positive, with serum HBV DNA 1-3.9 x 107 copies/mL (median 1 x 107 copies/mL). Within 4 to 8 weeks of initiation of therapy, HBV DNA became undetectable and serum ALT normalized. Serum HBeAg disappeared in all 4 patients, with the emergence of anti-HBeAb in 3 of them. Three patients also lost HBsAg with the evolution of a protective anti-HBsAb titer. One patient has already undergone successful kidney transplantation with no evidence of HBV recurrence (serum HBV DNA negative) 16 months postoperatively. Although our study sample is small, these data suggest that 3TC can induce a complete biochemical, virological and serological response in patients with CRF and HBV infection. Its use may enable safe kidney transplantation in selected patients.

Patterns of hepatitis B prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: the DOPPS

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B (HBV) historically has been a public health issue within hemodialysis units. This study estimates HBV prevalence and seroconversion rates across seven countries and investigates associations with facility level practice patterns.

METHODS

The study sample was from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), a cross-sectional, prospective, observational study of adult hemodialysis patients randomly selected from 308 dialysis facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the United States. Logistic regression was used to model the odds ratio (OR) of HBV prevalence, and Cox regression was used to model time from entry into the study to HBV seroconversion.

RESULTS

In this sample, mean HBV facility prevalence was 3.0% with a median of 1.9%. The percentage of facilities with an HBV prevalence 0% to 5% was 78.5%. Adjusted HBV prevalence was higher in France, Germany, and Italy and lower in Japan and the United Kingdom. The majority of facilities (78.1%) had a seroconversion rate of 0 conversions per 100 patient-years. Presence of a protocol for HBV-infected patients was significantly associated with HBV seroconversion in the separate practice pattern model [risk ratio (RR) = 0.52, P = 0.03] and in the combined practice pattern model (RR = 0.44, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There are differences in HBV prevalence and rate of seroconversion both at the country and the hemodialysis facility level. Presence of a protocol for HBV-infected patients was strongly and significantly associated with decreased risk for seroconversion. The observed variation suggests opportunities for improved HBV outcomes with further definition of optimal practice patterns at the facility level.

Perspectives on hepatitis B infections and the efficacy of vaccination (hepatitis B and pneumococci) in dialysis patients

Hepatitis B is a well known problem in dialysis units. We therefore examined the historical frequency of hepatitis B carriers in our unit, our vaccination program to hepatitis B virus (HBV), the response to hepatitis B vaccine, the IgG subclass response of anti-HBs and the response and IgG subclass response to pneumococcal vaccination (another vaccine) in dialysis patients. From 1970 and onwards 23 HBV carriers were found, but no new cases of hepatitis B occurred during the study period, i.e. from 1980 and onwards. Only one of the carriers was alive by the end of 2001. In four patients liver disease (in one of them liver cirrhosis) may have been a concomitant cause of death. The antibody response to hepatitis B vaccine was significantly lower in patients than in staff. In four patients a fourth injection was cancelled due to transplantation and bad health, while such data were lacking in 8 cases. In anti-HBs positive patients and controls a significant difference in the response of healthy adults was observed in anti-HBs IgG1 (p < 0.001) vs all other IgG subclasses. Dialysis patients had low levels, or negative findings, in all cases, with IgG1 as the highest proportion found (3/11 patients). An antibody response to pneumococcal vaccination was registered in 25 out of 29 dialysis patients (in all 86%). The IgG-subclass vaccination response to pneumococci in 28 dialysis patients was mainly IgG2 and IgG1 but also occurred in IgG3 and IgG4. Prevaccination antibody levels of the controls were higher in IgG1 and IgG2 (p < 0.01) (n = 21) than in dialysis patients (n = 28). Hepatitis B is nowadays a rare, but still dangerous disease in nephrology units. Dialysis patients have a reduced response to hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination schedules should be started early as some patients otherwise may not receive a fourth injection. The adequate antibody response to pneumococcal vaccination mainly due to IgG2 and IgG1 antibodies indicates that the antigen involved is important in vaccination responses in dialysis patients.

Lamivudine is effective for the treatment of reactivation of hepatitis B virus and fulminant hepatic failure in renal transplant recipients

Lamivudine is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. The aim of this study is to elucidate the effectiveness of lamivudine for the treatment of HBV reactivation with or without fulminant hepatic failure in renal transplant recipients. Forty-two renal transplant recipients (30 men, 12 women) were enrolled onto this study. Eight patients presented with HBV reactivation without fulminant hepatic failure and were administered lamivudine (group I), 5 patients presented with HBV and hepatic failure and were administered lamivudine (group II), 5 patients presented with HBV and hepatic failure but were not administered lamivudine (group III), and 24 patients were asymptomatic HBV carriers who were not administered lamivudine (group IV). Lamivudine was administered at a dose of 100 or 150 mg once daily. A greater prevalence of recent use of a combination of antilymphocyte immunoglobulin (ALG) and methylprednisolone (MP) occurred in patients with hepatic failure (groups II and III) than those without hepatic failure (30% versus 6.3%; P = 0.043). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MP use alone (20% versus 25%; P = 0.746). Mortality rates for groups I, II, and III were significantly different (12.5%, 40%, 100%; P = 0.008). One patient in group I died of sepsis without evidence of HBV DNA, even in the terminal event. In group II, 3 of 5 patients (60%) were rescued by lamivudine therapy. In group III, without lamivudine treatment, there was a 100% mortality rate despite intensive plasmapheresis. HBV DNA was not detectable after lamivudine treatment in 7 of 8 patients in group I and 3 of 5 patients in group II. Creatinine levels did not change significantly during lamivudine treatment. Hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rates after lamivudine treatment were 7.7% and 37.5%, respectively. We conclude that ALG is a potent trigger of HBV-related fulminant hepatic failure in renal transplant recipients, whereas lamivudine is an effective and lifesaving treatment. Prompt use of lamivudine is recommended in renal transplant recipients with evidence of HBV reactivation to prevent catastrophic fulminant hepatic failure.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

An open-label study of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B in six patients with chronic renal failure before and after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after kidney transplantation is aggressive, with a high mortality rate from liver disease mainly in patients who were serum hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) or HBV DNA-positive before transplantation. Lamivudine has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication. The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy and safety of lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic renal failure and chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

The study population consisted of six potential candidates for kidney or combined kidney and liver transplantation aged 25-49 yr (four patients had already undergone a kidney transplantation and developed chronic rejection). All were serum HBeAg and/or HBV DNA-positive and had been maintained on hemodialysis for 3 months to 3 yr. The duration of HBV infection was 7 months to 14 yr. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels ranged from 72 to 610 U/L (median, 158 U/L). Liver histological evaluation showed mild to moderate chronic hepatitis (n = 4) or liver cirrhosis (n = 2). None of the patients was infected with hepatitis C or D viruses. In four patients, treatment consisted of 10 mg of oral lamivudine per day. In the other two patients, a virological and biochemical response could be achieved only when the dose was increased to 40 mg/day.

RESULTS

Lamivudine treatment was associated with 1) normalization of serum ALT levels and rapid disappearance of serum HBV DNA (by hybridization) (five patients, one of whom died from sepsis); 2) seroconversion: disappearance of HBeAg (three patients) and HBsAg (two patients); 3) minor side effects: abdominal pain and nausea (one patient); 4) clinically asymptomatic lamivudine resistance 8 months after treatment (one patient); and 5) successful combined kidney and liver transplantation with no evidence of recurrent HBV infection at 6-8 months postoperatively (two patients with cirrhosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine therapy is effective as an HBV replication inhibitor in patients with chronic renal failure and HBV infection. Prospective studies of lamivudine pharmacokinetics and dosing in renal failure are needed to be able to treat patients appropriately. Although our study is small and further follow-up is needed, our data suggest that lamivudine therapy may enable selected patients with chronic hepatitis B to undergo kidney or combined kidney and liver transplantation in patients with established cirrhosis.

Outcomes in patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen-positive before transplantation: an analysis and study using the joint ISHLT/UNOS thoracic registry

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B surface antigenemia (HBsAg) has been considered at least a relative contraindication for heart transplantation, yet patients have undergone liver transplantation for hepatitis B-induced chronic liver disease, albeit with poorer results than for other liver diseases. The impact of asymptomatic hepatitis B infection on heart transplant outcome is not known.

METHODS

To examine this question, we queried the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/United Network of Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry for all patients undergoing heart transplantation who had been identified as positive for HBsAg before transplantation. We then sent a 4-question data instrument to the centers responsible for the identified patients. Seventy-eight patients were identified. Of the 78 data forms sent, 53 forms were returned with the requested data. Of the 53 data forms returned, the centers incorrectly identified 23 patients as positive for HBsAg, resulting in 30 patients who were confirmed as HBsAg positive and who served as the final cohort for this analysis.

RESULTS

The cohort included 24 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 46 +/- 16 years (range 0 to 68 years). Eleven patients had coronary artery disease, 14 had dilated cardiomyopathy, and 5 patients had a variety of other cardiac diseases. Of those tested at most recent follow-up, 20 of 25 patients continued to be positive for HBsAg, whereas 7 of 21 patients studied had converted and were hepatitis B serum antibody-positive. Approximately 37% of the patients had evidence of active hepatic inflammation or cirrhosis. We found a statistically significant correlation between positivity for hepatitis C antibodies and clinical liver disease (p = 0.0105). No difference in survival could be demonstrated between the study cohort and a reference heart transplant cohort, yet 5 of the 9 deaths were considered to be related to hepatitis B.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that clinical liver disease is common post-transplantation in HBsAg+ patients who presumably have no overt liver disease at the time of transplantation. Despite the inability to show a survival difference in this cohort, the fact that the majority of deaths were related to hepatitis B should suggest caution in accepting HBsAg+ patients for cardiac transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of lamivudine on replication of recurrent hepatitis B after cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of lamivudine therapy in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive/DNA-positive renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Six HBV DNA-positive cadaveric renal transplant recipients ranging in age from 49+/-6 years were administered lamivudine, at 100 mg/day for a period of at least 6 months, on a compassionate-use basis. Lamivudine is the (-) enantiomer of 3'-thiacytidine, which is known to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication. All of the patients but one were on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

RESULTS

The mean serum creatinine was 134+/-44 micromol/L. The mean duration of HBV infection was 230+/-54 months (156-288). All of the patients but one had high serum alanine aminotransferase levels (122+/-52 IU/L; range, 45-243). Histological evaluation showed the presence of either chronic active hepatitis (n=4) or cirrhosis (n=2). All of the patients but one were hepatitis B e antigen negative/hepatitis B e antibody positive, but none were coinfected with either hepatitis C virus or hepatitis D virus.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine therapy was associated with (i) a normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels in four of five patients when these levels were increased at the beginning (n=5); (ii) a rapid disappearance of HBV DNA from the serum (detected by hybridization) in all of the patients; (iii) the negativity of HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction in four patients; and (iv) no change in renal function and in proteinuria when present (one patient). Finally, no adverse effects were noted. When lamivudine therapy was stopped for four patients after 6 months, it was associated with a biochemical and virological relapse within the weeks that followed. Lamivudine therapy was therefore resumed for these patients.