Renal hemodynamic changes induced by captopril and angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism

Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Differences in the incidence of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) between ethnicities exist, with an estimated 42% of the variance explained by ethnicity itself. Caucasians have a higher proportion of lobar ICH (LICH, 15.4% of all ICH) than do Asians (3.4%). Alterations in the causal factor exposure between countries justify part of the ethnic variance in ICH incidence. One third of ICH risk can be explained by genetic variation; therefore, genetic differences between populations can partly explain the difference in ICH incidence. In this paper, we review the current knowledge of genetic variants associated with ICH in multiple ethnicities. Candidate gene variants reportedly associated with ICH were involved in the potential pathways of hypertension, vessel wall integrity, lipid metabolism, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, platelet function, and coagulopathy. Furthermore, variations in APOE (in multiple ethnicities), PMF1/SLC25A44 (in European), ACE (in Asian), MTHFR (in multiple ethnicities), TRHDE (in European), and COL4A2 (in European) were the most convincingly associated with ICH. The majority of the associated genes provide small contributions to ICH risk, with few of them being replicated in multiple ethnicities.

A Physiologic Approach to the Pharmacogenomics of Hypertension

Hypertension is a multifactorial condition with diverse physiological systems contributing to its pathogenesis. Individuals exhibit significant variation in their response to antihypertensive agents. Traditional markers, such as age, gender, diet, plasma renin level, and ethnicity, aid in drug selection. However, this review explores the contribution of genetics to facilitate antihypertensive agent selection and predict treatment efficacy. The findings, reproducibility, and limitations of published studies are examined, with emphasis placed on candidate genetic variants affecting drug metabolism, the renin-angiotensin system, adrenergic signalling, and renal sodium reabsorption. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified and replicated in unbiased genome-wide association studies of hypertension treatment are reviewed to illustrate the evolving understanding of the disease's complex and polygenic pathophysiology. Implementation efforts at academic centers seek to overcome barriers to the broad adoption of pharmacogenomics in the treatment of hypertension. The level of evidence required to support the implementation of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice is considered.

The ACE-DD genotype is associated with endothelial dysfunction in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D), the angiotensinogen M235T and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C polymorphisms, and hormone therapy used on endothelial function in postmenopausal women without manifestation of coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

Sixty-four postmenopausal women (42 hormone therapy users and 22 hormone therapy nonusers) without clinical manifestation of coronary artery disease were evaluated using external vascular ultrasonography to measure endothelium-dependent (hyperemic response, flow-mediated dilatation) and -independent (nitroglycerin) dilatation. Genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification.

RESULTS

Women with the ACE-DD genotype displayed a lower flow-mediated dilatation compared to those with the ACE-II genotype (8.4% +/- 3.9% vs 12.6% +/- 5.4%, P = 0.04). Endothelial function was not associated with the angiotensinogen M235T and anglotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C polymorphisms. ACE polymorphism seems to modulate endothelial function among postmenopausal women without hormone therapy (8.2% +/- 5.1% vs 18.4% +/- 5.9% for the DD and the II genotype, respectively, P = 0.02). However, in hormone therapy users, flow-mediated dilatation was similar according to the ACE genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ACE-I/D polymorphism is related to endothelial dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, a potential interaction between estrogen users and ACE polymorphism on endothelial function may be present.

ACE phenotyping as a first step toward personalized medicine for ACE inhibitors. Why does ACE genotyping not predict the therapeutic efficacy of ACE inhibition?

Angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Not all patients respond to ACE inhibitors, and it has been suggested that genetic variation might be a useful marker to predict the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs. In particular, the ACE insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism has been investigated in this regard. Despite a decade of intensive research involving the genotyping of thousands of patients, we still do not know whether ACE genotyping helps in predicting the success of ACE inhibition. This review critically addresses the concept that predictive information on therapeutic efficacy of ACE inhibitors might be obtained based on ACE genotyping. It answers the following questions: Do higher ACE levels really result in higher Ang II levels? Is ACE the only converting enzyme in humans? Does ACE inhibition affect ACE expression? Why does ACE have 2 catalytically active domains? What is the relevance of ACE inhibitor-induced signaling through membrane-bound ACE? The review ends with the proposal that ACE phenotyping may prove to be a better first step toward personalized medicine for ACE inhibitors than ACE genotyping.

Comparison of the effect of enalapril and losartan in conjunction with surgical coronary revascularisation versus revascularisation alone on systemic endothelial function

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of enalapril, losartan, and surgical coronary revascularisation on endothelial function, and the role of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism.

DESIGN

Randomised, controlled, blinded end point study.

SETTING

University tertiary referral cardiac centre.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

49 men awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomly assigned to treatment with losartan, enalapril, or control for two months before and three months after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Endothelial function was blindly analysed by brachial artery flow mediated dilatation (FMD) and ACE I/D genotype was determined.

RESULTS

FMD was impaired at baseline (1.0-1.7%) and after five months had improved to 5.2% with enalapril (p = 0.015), 5.0% with losartan (p = 0.0004), and 3.0% with CABG alone (p = 0.05). Patients with the II genotype had lower baseline FMD than those with DI or DD (0.1% v 1.7%, p = 0.038) and after enalapril or losartan treatment had greater improvement in FMD (mean (SEM) 7.1 (1.1)%) than patients with DI (3.1 (1.3)%, p = 0.024) or DD genotype (3.1 (1.1)%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril and losartan, with surgical coronary revascularisation, significantly improve systemic endothelial function. Revascularisation alone produces a quantitatively smaller, but still significant, improvement. The ACE genotype significantly modulates this response. Patients with the II genotype have a more pronounced impairment in endothelial function at baseline and a greater improvement in response to treatment with these agents.

Nuclear factor-kappaB activation in diabetic rat kidney: evidence for involvement of P-selectin in diabetic nephropathy

Activation of a transcription factor, nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB), is a key step in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. In this study, we investigated the role of P-selectin, a platelet-derived adhesion molecule, in diabetic nephropathy by examining the activation status of NF-kappaB in the renal cortex of streptozotocin (STZ)-treated rats. The STZ treatment induced pathogenetic parameters such as increased creatinine clearance, increased blood glucose and massive albuminuria in a time-dependent manner. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with a specific probe, representing the P-selectin gene promoter, revealed the activation status of NF-kappaB in the STZ-treated rats, as judged by the time-dependent increase in the formation of the specific protein-DNA complexes. This increase was associated with the increased pathogenetic parameters. Supershift assays with specific antibodies revealed that p50, but not p52, p65, Rel B, or c-Rel, may be involved in the activation of NF-kappaB, though the component primarily responsible for the increase could not be determined. Western blot analysis confirmed an increase in P-selectin in STZ-treated rats. Notably, treatment with ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate, an antioxidant and inhibitor of NF-kappaB, inhibited the activation of NF-kappaB in STZ-treated rats and decreased P-selectin in the renal cortical tissue. Our results indicate that expression of the P-selectin gene is induced through the activation of NF-kappaB and that P-selectin may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy.

Relationship between polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and the response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in hypertensive patients

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between polymorphism of the anglotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and the blood pressure response to ACE inhibition in a hypertensive cohort. Imidapril (5-10 mg/day) or benazepril (10-20 mg/day) was administered for 6 weeks to 517 essential hypertensives. ACE gene polymorphism was examined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and the patients were classified as having the 190-bp deletion homozygous (DD) genotype, the 490-bp insertion homozygous (II) genotype, or the 490-bp insertion, 190-bp deletion heterozygous (ID) genotype. The achieved change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) was analyzed for association with genotypes at the ACE gene locus. The DD genotype was observed in 132 patients (25.5%), the ID genotype in 255 patients (49.3%), and the II genotype in 130 patients (25.2%). The SBP reductions in the patients with the DD genotype, II genotype, and ID genotype were -14.5 +/- 12.7 mmHg, -14.3 +/- 13.1 mmHg and -14.0 +/- 12.2 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.94). The DBP reductions in the patients with the DD genotype, II genotype, and ID genotype were -8.7 +/- 7.4 mmHg, -8.7 +/- 7.7 mmHg and -8.5 +/- 6.7 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.96). There was no significant association between the ACE gene polymorphisms and the response to ACE inhibition. These results suggest that ACE genotype does not predict the blood pressure-lowering response to antihypertensive treatment with ACE inhibition.

Pharmacogenomics: the future of drug therapy

Pharmacogenomics aims to optimize patient management by customizing and synthesizing drugs based on genetic variations in drug response. Polymorphisms affecting metabolism, receptors, and absorption can influence drug sensitivity, toxicity, and dosing. The Human Genome Project, DNA chips, and bioinformatics advance the practice of this field by, respectively, identifying polymorphisms related to drug response, determining an individual's profile of polymorphisms, and integrating data to facilitate clinical decision making. Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics include increasing efficacy and preventing adverse drug reactions, thus improving patient care and decreasing costs. These factors imply that a thorough understanding of the principles and applications of pharmacogenomics will be an indispensable part of the future of drug therapy in clinical medicine.

ACE genotype and ACE inhibitor response in kidney disease: a perspective

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce blood pressure and slow the progression of renal diseases. However, a substantial interindividual variability in treatment response also has been noted. The activity of ACE is partially dependent on the presence or absence of a 287-bp element in intron 16, and this insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism accounts for 47% of the total phenotypic variance in plasma ACE; DD subjects have the highest; ID subjects, intermediate; and II individuals, the lowest concentrations. Data suggest that genotype also determines tissue enzyme activity, and, at least under certain conditions, ACE activity is a rate-limiting step for angiotensin II formation. It therefore has been speculated that the ACE polymorphism also might affect therapeutic effects of ACE inhibitors. Unfortunately, clinical studies performed to date do not allow us to draw definite conclusions. Nonetheless, the rapidly evolving area of pharmacogenomics soon will also affect therapeutic decisions in the field of nephrology and hypertension.

Angiotensin converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism and cardiovascular disease: therapeutic implications

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in Westernised societies. It is well known that the aetiology of this devastating disorder involves both genetic and environmental factors. Sequence variants of the components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the kallikrein-kinin system are suggested to have significant influences on cardiovascular homeostasis. Both gene targeting and transgenic studies in mice have clearly suggested a critical role of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene in blood pressure regulation. Furthermore, an up-regulation of myocardial ACE gene expression has been observed in patients with heart failure. Thus, the ACE gene has been recognised as a top candidate gene for cardiovascular research. Over the past decade, the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of a 287-bp Alu element in intron 16 of the ACE gene has attracted significant attention and has been extensively investigated in a spectrum of cardiovascular phenotypes, because of its correlation with serum ACE activity. A large majority of previous studies have shown a positive association between the DD genotype and an increased risk of myocardial infarction, but results in hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyopathy and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty remain quite controversial. Since ACE inhibitors are widely used in hypertension and congestive heart failure, we also review the literature on the relationship of ACE I/D polymorphism with ACE inhibitor response. It appears that this polymorphism has some moderate impact on the cardiovascular response to ACE inhibitors but there is no consensus as to which allele confers a more pronounced effect. In addition, previous data are suggestive of an association between the ACE I allele and a greater risk of increased occurrence of ACE inhibitor-induced cough, but such a relationship needs further confirmation. Overall, since ACE I/D is only an intronic marker, the true locus that controls the ACE enzyme activity remains to be identified, and could be located within either the ACE gene or another nearby gene such as the human growth hormone gene. We note that since associations tend to vary across different gender or ethnic groups, or across different socio-ecological settings, consideration of potential gene-gene and gene-environment interactions should be made. Furthermore, the dissection of the genetic underpinning of cardiovascular disease needs delineation of all molecular variants of the key physiological pathways that influence cardiovascular function.

Pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and cardiovascular therapeutics: the way forward

The completion of sequencing of the human genome will be the vanguard for numerous advances in medicine. The first discernible application is likely to occur in pharmacogenomics, a field focused on the influence of genetic differences on the variability in patients' response to medications. While an inherited basis for drug response has been recognized for some time, it is the confluence of molecular biology, high-throughput genotyping, and bioinformatics that has made it practical to study the genetic basis of variability to medications on a large scale. Pharmacogenomics may enable clinicians to prospectively identify patients most likely to derive benefit from a drug, with minimal likelihood of adverse events. This DNA-based approach to predicting clinical drug efficacy and toxicity would shift the current prescribing paradigm from its empirical nature to a more patient-specific model, ushering in a new era of personalized medicine. Polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes, drug targets, and disease pathogenesis genes are associated with therapeutic effect to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. Moreover, pharmacogenomics and functional genomics are expected to have a profound impact on the process of drug discovery and development. Finally, pharmacogenomics is likely to transform the way clinical trials are conducted by allowing for the selection of a more homogeneous study population, thereby reducing the size and cost of clinical investigation.

Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy

There is great heterogeneity in the way humans respond to medications, often requiring empirical strategies to find the appropriate drug therapy for each patient (the "art" of medicine). Over the past 50 years, there has been great progress in understanding the molecular basis of drug action and in elucidating genetic determinants of disease pathogenesis and drug response. Pharmacogenomics is the burgeoning field of investigation that aims to further elucidate the inherited nature of interindividual differences in drug disposition and effects, with the ultimate goal of providing a stronger scientific basis for selecting the optimal drug therapy and dosages for each patient. These genetic insights should also lead to mechanism-based approaches to the discovery and development of new medications. This review highlights the current status of work in this field and addresses strategies that hold promise for future advances in pharmacogenomics.

Add-on angiotensin receptor blockade with maximized ACE inhibition

BACKGROUND

Prolonged angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy leads to angiotensin I (Ang I) accumulation, which may "escape" ACE inhibition, generate Ang II, stimulate the Ang II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor, and exert deleterious renal effects in patients with chronic renal diseases. We tested the hypothesis that losartan therapy added to a background of chronic (>3 months) maximal ACE inhibitor therapy (lisinopril 40 mg q.d.) will result in additional Ang II antagonism in patients with proteinuric chronic renal failure with hypertension.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with proteinuric moderately advanced chronic renal failure completed a two-period, crossover, randomized controlled trial. Each period was one month with a two-week washout between periods. In one period, patients received lisinopril 40 mg q.d. along with other antihypertensive therapy, and in the other, losartan 50 mg q.d. was added to the previously mentioned regimen. Hemodynamic measurements included ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABP; Spacelabs 90207), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with iothalamate clearances and cardiac outputs by acetylene helium rebreathing technique. Supine plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone and 24-hour urine protein were measured in all patients.

RESULTS

Twelve patients had diabetic nephropathy, and four had chronic glomerulonephritis. The mean age (+/- SD) was 53 +/- 9 years. The body mass index was 38 +/- 5.7 kg/m(2), and all except two patients were males. Seated cuff blood pressure was 156 +/- 18/88 +/- 12 mm Hg. The pulse rate was 77 +/- 11 per min, and the cardiac index was 2.9 +/- 0.5 L/min/m(2). Mean log 24-hour protein excretion/g creatinine or overall ABPs did not change. Mean placebo subtracted, losartan-attributable change in protein excretion was +1% (95% CI, -20% to 28%, P = 0.89). Similarly, the change in systolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was 4.6 mm Hg (-5.7 to 14.9, P = 0.95), and diastolic ABP was 1.5 mm Hg (-4.5 to 7.6, P = 0.59). No change was seen in cardiac output. However, there was a mean 14% increase (95% CI, 3 to 26%, P = 0.017) in GFR attributable to losartan therapy. A concomitant fall in plasma renin activity by 32% was seen (95% CI, -15%, - 45%, P = 0.002). No hyperkalemia, hypotension, or acute renal failure occurred in the trial. These results were not attributable to sequence or carryover effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Add-on losartan therapy did not improve proteinuria or ABP over one month of add on therapy. Improvement of GFR and fall in plasma renin activity suggest that renal hemodynamic and endocrine changes are more sensitive measures of AT1 receptor blockade. Whether add-on AT1 receptor blockade causes antiproteinuric effects or long-term renal protection requires larger and longer prospective, randomized controlled trials.

Relationship between the angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and the forearm vasodilator response to estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the relationship between the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotype and the change in forearm vasoreactivity in response to a three-month course of oral estrogen in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND

The ACE genotype is a known predictor of the response to an ACE inhibitor drug; however, it is not clear whether it can modify the effect of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on endothelial function in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Fifty-five postmenopausal women received 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen daily for three months. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography.

RESULTS

Twenty-one, 25 and 9 patients had the insertion/deletion (ID), II and DD genotypes, respectively. Plasma ACE activity was significantly higher at baseline in patients with either the DD or ID genotype than in those with the II genotype (p < 0.05). A significant decrease in plasma ACE activity with ERT was seen in the ID and II genotypes (p < 0.05), but not in the DD genotype. There were no significant differences in the FBF responses to reactive hyperemia at baseline between the three groups. Estrogen replacement therapy did not alter the FBF response to reactive hyperemia in the DD genotype (4.0 +/- 1.3%), although ERT significantly increased the FBF response in the ID and II genotypes (32.6 +/- 7.5% and 30.6 +/- 6.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). Forearm blood flow after administration of sublingual nitroglycerin did not change over three months in any of the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the effect of ERT in postmenopausal women on forearm endothelial function may be determined in part by the genotype of the ACE gene.

Antihypertensive pharmacogenetics: getting the right drug into the right patient

Pharmacogenetic investigation seeks to identify genetic factors that contribute to interpatient and interdrug variation in responses to antihypertensive drug therapy. Classical studies have characterized single gene polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes that are responsible for large interindividual differences in pharmacokinetic responses to several antihypertensive drugs. Progress is being made using candidate gene and genome scanning approaches to identify and characterize many additional genes influencing pharmacodynamic mechanisms that contribute to interindividual differences in responses to antihypertensive drug therapy. Knowledge of polymorphic variation in these genes will help to predict individual patients' blood pressure responses to antihypertensive drug therapy and may also provide new insights into molecular mechanisms responsible for elevation of blood pressure.

Renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms: potential mechanisms for their association with cardiovascular diseases

Since the first description of the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism more than a decade ago, many hundreds of investigations have reported associations between this polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases. Subsequently, similar studies were performed in relationship with several other renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms, most notably the angiotensinogen M235T polymorphism and the angiotensin AT(1) receptor A1166C polymorphism. Surprisingly however, especially in view of the many contradictory results that have been obtained, very little attention has been paid to the mechanism(s) that may link these genetic variants and respective diseases. Here, we review the limited evidence that is currently available on the functional consequences (including compensatory mechanisms) of the above three renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms, in order to provide an explanation for the reported associations (or lack thereof) between these polymorphisms and cardiovascular diseases.

Advances in pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics

Large differences among normal human subjects in the efficacy and safety of many therapeutic agents are caused by genetically controlled polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and drug receptors. Development of pharmacogenomics as a new field has accelerated progress in pharmacogenetics by elucidating at the level of the human genome the inherited basis for those large interindividual variations. Examples discussed in this review illustrate how this approach can be used not only to guide new drug discovery but also to individualize therapy. Adverse drug reactions, often attributable to large differences among subjects in drug response, constitute a leading cause of death in the USA. Such high morbidity and mortality could be reduced by application of the principles of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, defined broadly as the study of genetically caused variability in drug response.

Comparative study of ACE-inhibition, angiotensin II antagonism, and calcium channel blockade on flow-mediated vasodilation in patients with coronary disease (BANFF study)

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition on brachial flow-mediated vasodilation.

BACKGROUND

Quinapril, an ACE inhibitor with high affinity, has been shown to improve coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. The effectiveness of different vasoactive agents to improve human endothelial function is unknown.

METHODS

High resolution ultrasound was used to assess endothelium-dependent brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in patients with coronary disease. We studied 80 patients (mean age 58 +/- 0.9 years) in a partial-block, cross-over design trial. Patients were randomized to one of four different drug sequences to receive quinapril 20 mg, enalapril 10 mg, losartan 50 mg or amlodipine 5 mg daily. Each patient received three drugs with a two-week washout period between treatments. The primary end point was the absolute difference in FMD after eight weeks of each study drug compared with their respective baselines analyzed in a blinded fashion.

RESULTS

There was mild impairment of FMD at baseline (7.3 +/- 0.6%). The change in FMD from baseline was significant only for quinapril (1.8 +/- 1%, p < 0.02). No change was seen with losartan (0.8 +/- 1.1%, p = 0.57), amlodipine (0.3 +/- 0.9%, p = 0.97) or enalapril (-0.2 +/- 0.8%, p = 0.84). No significant change in nitroglycerin-induced dilation occurred with drug therapy. The improvement in quinapril response was not seen in those with the DD ACE genotype (0.5 +/- 2.1%) but was seen in those with the ID and II genotype (3.3 +/- 1.2 and 3.2 +/- 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Only quinapril was associated with significant improvement in FMD, and this response is related to the presence of the insertion allele of the ACE genotype.

Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics

Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, receptors, and other drug targets have been linked to interindividual differences in the efficacy and toxicity of many medications. Pharmacogenomic studies are rapidly elucidating the inherited nature of these differences in drug disposition and effects, thereby enhancing drug discovery and providing a stronger scientific basis for optimizing drug therapy on the basis of each patient's genetic constitution.

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme genotype significantly affects progression of IgA glomerulonephritis in an italian population

To evaluate the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the progression of immunoglobulin A glomerulonephritis (IgA-GN), genotype distribution in 81 biopsy-proven cases of IgA-GN was studied. A logistic regression model showed that the risk for homozygous DD was not significantly elevated in patients with IgA-GN compared with healthy subjects (odds ratio = 1.16; confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 3.3). However, the 5-year (78% v 90%) and 10-year (52% v 82%) renal survival rates for 47 patients with serum creatine (Cr) levels of 1.5 mg/dL or less at biopsy was significantly less in DD patients (n = 18; chi2 = 5.41; P = 0.02). The hazard ratio (HR) for DD (multivariate analysis from Cox proportional model after adjustment for known factors of progression, such as hypertension [HPT] and proteinuria [PTO]) was 3.07 (CI, 1.1 to 9.4). The HR for heavy PTO was 6.1 (CI, 1.9 to 19). The association of DD genotype with progression was even more striking when patients with other risk factors (heavy proteinuria) were excluded, as shown by DD-related risk in the absence (HR = 3.6; CI, 1.1 to 12) and presence (HR = 2; CI, 0.4 to 10) of PTO. The risk ratio was further increased by the coexistence of DD + PTO (HR = 9.16; CI, 1.8 to 15.7). Furthermore, in a cross-sectional study among patients with IgA-GN, a logistic regression model showed that the risk for homozygous DD was greater, although not at a statistically significant level in the end-stage renal failure subgroup compared with the normal renal function subgroup (odds ratio = 3.16; CI, 0.7 to 13.7) after adjustment by sex, age at biopsy, HPT, PTO, and therapy. Last, DD was significantly more frequent in those patients who started hemodialysis at an earlier age (chi2 for trend = 6.81; P = 0.009). Our study further supports that ACE genotype is a risk factor not for the development, but for the worsening of IgA-GN clinical course. However, on the basis of current knowledge, we cannot exclude that I/D polymorphism may simply serve as a prognostic marker, eventually linked with other discrete loci involved in the progression of renal damage.

Effect of the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene on response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure

There is marked interindividual variation in serum and tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels for which the insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism in intron 16 of the ACE gene is a marker. ACE inhibitors have important effects on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. The influence of this polymorphism on the response to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure is not known. We studied response by ACE genotype of 34 subjects in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study comparing 6 weeks of lisinopril (10 mg, o.d.) or captopril (25 mg, t.d.s.) on 24-h blood pressure (BP) profile and on renal function in patients with symptomatic heart failure [mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 24%]. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 99mTc diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), and ambulatory 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP; Spacelabs 90207) were assessed at the beginning and end of treatment periods. There was a significant relation between ACE genotype and change in MAP with captopril (mm Hg; DD group, -0.5; ID, -4.7; II, -7.4; p = 0.02) but not to lisinopril (mm Hg DD, -6.0; ID, -6.6; II, -7.4; p = 0.89) in these patients. There was no significant relation between genotype and change in GFR with captopril (percentage change from baseline: DD, +7.9; ID, +13.1; II, -0.6; p = 0.45) or lisinopril (percentage change from baseline: DD, -0.1; ID, -3.0; II, -13.3; p = 0.39), but the decline in renal function tended to be greatest in II subjects. Whereas the results are not conclusive, there may be a significant interaction between ACE genotype and response to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and risk of sarcoidosis

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of sarcoidosis. Serum ACE levels in normal and sarcoidosis patients are influenced by an insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism in the ACE gene. To elucidate the role of this ACE gene polymorphism in sarcoidosis, we conducted a case-control study in African Americans and Caucasians. The ACE gene (I/D) polymorphism did not differ between 60 Caucasian cases and 48 control subjects (p = 0.577). In contrast, a comparison of 183 African-American cases and 111 control subjects resulted in a marked difference in genotypic distributions (p = 0.005). In African Americans, the risk for sarcoidosis was 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 2. 36) for ID heterozygotes, and 3.17 (95% CI = 1.50 to 6.71) for deletion/deletion (DD) homozygotes. The risk associated with the DD homozygotes was even greater in African Americans when cases were restricted to those with a positive family history (odds ratio = 4. 83; 95% CI = 1.86 to 12.59). Further analyses of African-American cases showed that the ACE genotype was not associated with disease severity, extrathoracic involvement, or overall radiographic change 2 to 4 yr after diagnosis. We did find a moderate association between the II genotype and radiographic progression (OR = 2.97; 95% CI = 1.01 to 8.76). Our results suggest the ACE genotype may play a more important role in sarcoidosis susceptibility and progression in African Americans than Caucasians.

Angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphisms and renal disease

In the past year there has been a profusion of reports identifying a possible association between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme and renal diseases. Rather than clarifying the situation, it has become more difficult to interpret its significance owing to small sample sizes and concerns over methodology; hence, studies are frequently contradictory. Despite these concerns there is evidence for a role of this polymorphism in progressive renal disease. This review summarizes the major studies in this field and suggests future strategies that might be employed to identify useful genetic markers in nephrology, for which the angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphism has acted as an important paradigm.