Protection by indomethacin against acute radiation esophagitis

Amomum subulatum fruits protect against radiation-induced esophagitis by regulating antioxidant status and inflammatory responses

Radiation esophagitis (RE) is an inimical event that requires proper management while carrying out radiotherapy for thoracic cancers. The present study investigates the protective effect of dry fruits of the culinary and folkloric spice Amomum subulatum against experimental thoracic radiation-induced esophagitis. C57BL/6 mice were subjected to 25 Gy whole thorax irradiation and administered with 250 mg/kg body weight of methanolic extract of A. subulatum dry fruits (MEAS) orally for four consecutive weeks. Changes in tissue antioxidant activities, oxidative stress parameters, expression of antioxidant, inflammation, and fibrosis-related genes were observed. Administration of MEAS boosted antioxidant status, thereby reducing radiation-induced oxidative stress in the esophagus. PCR (polymerase chain reaction) results showed decreased expression of apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis-associated genes as well as increased expression of vital cytoprotective and antioxidant genes in MEAS-treated mice, manifesting its protective effect against radiation-induced oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and fibrosis in the esophagus. Further, histopathology, immunohistochemistry (Cyclooxygenase-2), and Masson's Trichrome staining ascertained the protective effect of MEAS in alleviating radiation-induced esophageal injury. The synergistic effect of bioactive phytochemicals in MEAS with potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory efficacies might have contributed to its mitigating effect against RE. Taken together, our results ascertained the radioprotective potential of MEAS, suggesting its possible nutraceutical application as a radiation countermeasure.

Transcriptome Profiling Unveils a Critical Role of IL-17 Signaling-Mediated Inflammation in Radiation-Induced Esophageal Injury in Rats

Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms involving the initiation and progression of radiation-induced esophageal injury (RIEI) is important for prevention and treatment. Despite ongoing advances, the underlying mechanisms controlling RIEI remain largely unknown. In the present study, RNA-seq was performed to characterize mRNA profiles of the irradiated rat esophagus exposed to 0, 25, or 35 Gy irradiation. Bioinformatics analyses including dose-dependent differentially expressed genes (DEGs), Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome (KEGG) pathway, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, and immune infiltration were performed. 134 DEGs were screened out with a dose-dependent manner (35 Gy > 25 Gy > control, or 35 Gy < 25 Gy < control). GO and KEGG analyses showed that the most significant mechanism was IL-17 signaling-mediated inflammatory response. 5 hub genes, Ccl11, Cxcl3, Il17a, S100a8, and S100a9, were identified through the intersection of the DEGs involved in inflammatory response, IL-17 pathway, and PPI network. Additionally, immune infiltration analysis showed the activation of macrophages, monocytes, T cells, NKT cells, and neutrophils, among which macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils might be the main sources of S100a8 and S100a9. Thus, these findings further our understanding on the molecular biology of RIEI and may help develop more effective therapeutic strategies.

Lycopene in the Prevention of Radiation-Induced Esophagitis

We aimed to research whether lycopene (L) could prevent radiation-induced acute esophageal toxicity in Wistar albino rats. 60 rats were placed in five groups as follows: control, L, radiotherapy (RT), L before RT (L + RT), and L before and after RT (L + RT + L). 6 mg/kg bw/day L was administered 7 days in the L group, 7 days before RT in the L + RT group, and 7 days before and after in the L + RT + L group. 35 Gy thoracic RT was performed. Serum L levels were measured, and the esophagi were evaluated histopathologically for intraepithelial degenerative changes-necrosis, vacuole formation, inflammation, regeneration-mitosis, and subepithelial bulla formation. L levels were significantly higher in the L receiving groups. All histopathologic results were significantly worse in the RT group than in the none-RT groups. The L + RT and the L + RT + L groups had better results than the RT group. Grade 2-3 degenerative changes-necrosis and vacuole formation were significantly lesser in the L + RT and the L + RT + L groups than those in the RT group. There was a trend toward decreased subepithelial bulla formation and inflammation in the L + RT and the L + RT + L groups compared to the RT group. Regeneration-mitosis was insignificantly lesser in the L + RT and significantly fewer in the L + RT + L groups than that in the RT group.

Development of Antioxidant COX-2 Inhibitors as Radioprotective Agents for Radiation Therapy-A Hypothesis-Driven Review

Radiation therapy (RT) evolved to be a primary treatment modality for cancer patients. Unfortunately, the cure or relief of symptoms is still accompanied by radiation-induced side effects with severe acute and late pathophysiological consequences. Inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are potentially useful in this regard because radioprotection of normal tissue and/or radiosensitizing effects on tumor tissue have been described for several compounds of this structurally diverse class. This review aims to substantiate the hypothesis that antioxidant COX-2 inhibitors are promising radioprotectants because of intercepting radiation-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in normal tissue, especially the vascular system. For this, literature reporting on COX inhibitors exerting radioprotective and/or radiosensitizing action as well as on antioxidant COX inhibitors will be reviewed comprehensively with the aim to find cross-points of both and, by that, stimulate further research in the field of radioprotective agents.

Effect of topical chamomile on immunohistochemical levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of topical chamomile and corticosteroid treatment on the profile of tissue cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) in 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters.

METHODS

Thirty-six hamsters were randomly separated into three groups (12 animals each): Group I--without treatment (control); Group II-treatment with chamomile (Ad-Muc(®)); and Group III--treatment with corticosteroid (betamethasone elixir- Celestone(®)). The animals received an intraperitoneal injection of 5--fluorouracil on Days 0 and 2. On Days 3 and 4, the buccal mucosa was scratched and therapy was initiated on Day 5. Three animals from each group were killed on Days 0, 5, 10, and 14 and the buccal mucosa was removed. The streptavidin-biotin complex method was used to delineate the in situ distribution, localization, and semiquantitative analysis of IL-1β and TNF-α. Data from the semiquantitative analysis of immunohistochemical staining were comparatively analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test.

RESULTS

The distribution and localization of IL-1β and TNF-α immunolabeling were similar. These proteins exhibited a diffuse pattern distributed throughout the connective tissue. The epithelium and adipose tissue were negative for both proteins. The semiquantitative analysis revealed that immunolabeling of IL-1β and TNF-α increased in all groups with the development of mucositis. On Day 10 (period of peak mucositis), the group treated with chamomile had lower scores for both pro-inflammatory cytokines.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with topical chamomile reduced the tissue levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, thereby demonstrating anti-inflammatory action in oral mucositis in hamsters.

Healing action of topical chamomile on 5-fluoracil induced oral mucositis in hamster

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis is a common complication in the treatment of cancer. Its management and prevention are seen as high priority in cancer patient care. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of topical chamomile in the treatment of oral mucositis induced by 5-fluoracil (5-FU) in hamsters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred five hamsters were randomly separated into three groups (35 animals each): group I--without treatment (control); group II--treatment with chamomile (Ad-Muc®); and group III--treatment with corticoid (betamethasone elixir--Celestone®). The animals received an intraperitoneal injection of 5-FU on days 0 and 2. On days 3 and 4, the buccal mucosa was scratched and therapy was initiated on day 5. Three animals were sacrificed on days 0, 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16, weighed, and the buccal mucosa removed for clinical and histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

The animals that developed mucositis and were treated with chamomile or the corticoid agent weighed significantly less than those in the control group. The group treated with the corticoid agent exhibited a more severe clinical condition, whereas the group treated with chamomile exhibited mild mucositis throughout the experiment. The group treated with chamomile had a 12-fold greater chance of scoring zero (absence of mucositis) than the control group. Analysis of the histopathological results demonstrated that the group treated with chamomile exhibited a lesser degree of mucositis throughout the evaluation period in comparison to the control and corticoid groups.

CONCLUSION

Chamomile proved effective in the treatment of oral mucositis in a hamster model. However, well-designed clinical studies are needed to confirm the clinical efficacy of this medicine in humans.

Amelioration of the pathological changes induced by radiotherapy in normal tissues

Damage to normal tissues remains the most important limiting factor in the treatment of cancer by radiotherapy. In order to deliver a radiation dose sufficient to eradicate a localised tumour, the normal tissues need to be protected. A number of pharmacological agents have been used experimentally, and some clinically, to alleviate radiation damage to normal tissues but at present there is no effective clinical treatment to protect normal tissues against radiation injury. This paper reviews the efficacy of pharmacological substances used after radiation exposure. The limited evidence available suggests that radiation insult, like many other tissue injuries, is amenable to pharmacological intervention. However, care must be taken in the administration of these substances for the management of different aspects of radiation damage because there appears to be a tissue-specific response to different pharmacological agents. Also, one must be aware of the limitations of results obtained from animal models, which do not necessarily correlate to benefits in the clinic; the conflicting results reported with some modifiers of radiation damage; and the toxicity of these substances and radiation doses used in published studies. Conflicting results may arise from differences in the pathophysiologic processes involved in the development of radiation lesions in different tissues, and in the markers used to assess the efficacy of treatment agents.

Effect of selective inhibitors of inflammation on oral mucositis: preclinical studies

OBJECTIVE

Oral mucositis is a severe, dose-limiting side effect of radio(chemo)therapy for head and neck tumors. The epithelial radiation response (ulceration) is accompanied by inflammatory changes. Their interaction with the epithelial processes remains unclear. The present study was initiated to determine the effect of inhibition of TNF-alpha or COX-2 on the epithelial radiation response in the mouse tongue model.

METHODS

Daily fractionated irradiation was given with 5 x 3 Gy/week over one (days 0-4) or two weeks (days 0-4, 7-11). Each protocol was terminated by graded test doses (5 dose groups, 10 animals each) to a defined area of the lower tongue surface to generate full dose-effect curves for mucosal ulceration. A TNF-alpha inhibiting antibody (Infliximab) or a COX-2 inhibitor (Celecoxib) was administered.

RESULTS

No effect of Infliximab or Celecoxib was found in any of the protocols. Isoeffective doses for ulcer induction were unchanged. Also, the time course of the response was largely unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of TNF-alpha or COX-2, two dominating inflammatory pathways, did not result in modulation of the response of oral epithelium during fractionated irradiation. This suggests that the inflammatory changes mediated through TNF-alpha or COX-2 are not relevant for the epithelial radiation response of oral mucosa.

Concurrent celecoxib versus placebo in patients with stage II–III non-small cell lung cancer: A randomised phase II trial

In several pre-clinical models, cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors increase radio-sensitivity of tumours, whilst not affecting normal tissues. A randomised phase II trial comparing concurrent radiotherapy with either celecoxib or placebo in patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer was therefore initiated. Because of poor recruitment, the study was stopped after the enrollment of 41 patients, instead of the foreseen 102. None of the endpoints differed significantly between both groups. However, due to the limited number of patients, no definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Anti-inflammatory agents in the management of alimentary mucositis

BACKGROUND

Alimentary mucositis is a significant complication of cancer therapy, with important clinical and economic implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In June 2005, the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology conducted an evidence-based review of the literature on alimentary mucositis. The goal of this literature review was to update previously published guidelines for the management of mucositis.

RESULTS

This article reports the findings of the subgroup charged with reviewing the literature related to anti-inflammatory interventions. Considerable preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that the use of anti-inflammatory agents may be a promising approach to reduce the severity of mucositis. However, there was not enough evidence to support any new guidelines advocating the use of any specific anti-inflammatory intervention.

CONCLUSION

Thus, there is a need for well-designed clinical trials evaluating the use of anti-inflammatory agents in the management of mucositis.

Selective COX-2 inhibition is associated with decreased mucosal damage induced by acid and pepsin in rabbit esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of COX-1 and/or COX-2 inhibition in a model of chronic esophagitis in rabbits.

METHODS

Both high- and low-grade esophagitis were induced in rabbits by the perfusion of acidified pepsin. Rabbits were treated with either a selective COX-2 inhibitor (DFU[3-(3-Fluorophenyl)-4-(4-Methanesulfonyl)-5,5-Dimethyl-5H-Furan-2-One];30 mg/Kg/day), a nonspecific COX inhibitor (indomethacin; 2 mg/Kg/day), or a COX-1 preferential inhibitor (piroxicam; 2 mg/Kg/12 h).

RESULTS

Prostaglandins are derived from COX-1 activity in the normal esophagus. Both low- and high-grade esophagitis are associated with a progressive increase of COX activity, which is partially dependent on the COX-2 isoform. DFU reduced muscosal damage in both models of esophagitis. However, indomethacin did not affect significantly mucosal damage, and piroxicam increased damage in low-grade esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

COX-1 activity is constitutive in the rabbit esophageal mucosa, but both COX-2 and COX-1 activity are increased under the impact of acidified pepsin. Treatment with the COX-2 inhibitor DFU is associated with improvement of mucosal damage, which may have therapeutic implications.

Endoscopy in patients receiving radiation therapy to the thorax

Radiation therapy for thoracic malignancies is often complicated by radiation-induced esophagitis. Symptoms of radiation esophagitis are nonspecific and include dysphagia, odynophagia, and chest pain. Patients receiving radiation therapy are also at risk for infectious esophagitis, which can be indistinguished clinically from radiation-induced esophagitis. We retrospectively reviewed data on patients who had esophagitis symptoms during or after thoracic radiation therapy and were referred for upper endoscopy. We sought to determine how often infectious esophagitis or cancer was present, as compared to radiation-induced esophagitis alone. Twenty-four upper endoscopies were performed on 16 patients over a three-year period to evaluate esophagitis symptoms. Forty-four percent of the patients endoscoped had infectious esophagitis or recurrent cancer diagnosed by endoscopy. No complications occurred from the procedures. Esophagoscopy is a safe procedure that should be considered, to exclude infection or cancer, in patients who develop esophagitis symptoms during or after thoracic radiation.

Pharmacological and dietary prophylaxis and treatment of acute actinic esophagitis during mediastinal radiotherapy

Our purpose was to evaluate a pharmacological and dietary protocol of prophylaxis and treatment of acute actinic esophagitis during mediastinal radiotherapy. This phase II study was conducted on 29 patients affected by cancer not directly involving the esophagus. The irradiated volume included at least 10 cm of esophagus with a median dose of 46 Gy and the incidence of clinical acute esophagitis was scored with RTOG-EORTC tables. During the entire course of radiation therapy all patients were subjected to prophylaxis pharmacological therapy in addition to dietetic rules commonly used. All patients were evaluable, 9 (31%) had no acute esophageal toxicity, 20 (69%) had toxicity of degree 1, and no patient showed a toxicity of degree 2, 3, or 4, there were no toxicity-related related interruptions of the radiotherapy course. In conclusion, this low cost protocol seems to reduce the incidence and degree of acute radiation esophagitis (without added morbidity), compared with literature reports.

Prostaglandin E2 is the major arachidonic acid metabolite secreted by esophageal mucosal cells in rabbits

Unlike gastric mucosa, it has been considered that lipoxygenase metabolites protect the esophageal mucosa and that prostaglandins are only secreted in the presence of esophageal inflammation. The aim of this study was to determine the profile of arachidonic acid metabolites and their response to regulatory compounds in rabbit esophageal mucosal cells in culture. Eicosanoids secreted into the medium were extracted and identified by HPLC and RIA. Esophageal mucosal cells in culture metabolized arachidonic acid mainly through the cycloxygenase pathway and PGE2 was the major arachidonic acid metabolite secreted. The addition of IL-1 beta and A23187 (calcium ionophore) stimulated PGE2 synthesis. In basal conditions neither leukotrienes nor HETEs were detected. However, the addition of the NDGA induced the secretion of lipoxygenase metabolites identified as 12-15 HETEs. In conclusion, rabbit esophageal epithelial cells in culture metabolize arachidonic acid via both cycloxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways. In our system, PGE2 was the main arachidonic acid metabolite.

[The therapeutic management of radiogenic oral mucositis]

BACKGROUND

Acute reactions of oral mucosa are a frequent side effect of radiotherapy, which often necessitates interruption of the treatment. Marked proliferation of tumor stem cells during treatment interruptions may occur in squamous cell carcinomata, which represent the majority of tumors in the head and neck area. Hence a fatal consequence of treatment breaks may be a significant decrease in tumor cure rates. Furthermore, marked acute responses frequently result in increased late sequelae ("consequential damage"). Therefore, amelioration of the mucosal response aiming at avoiding treatment breaks and at reduction of late reactions could definitely increase the therapeutic success of radiation treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Various possibilities for the therapeutic management of radiation-induced oral mucositis with a symptomatic or radio- and epithelial biological background are summarized and presented systematically.

RESULTS

A variety of prophylactic and therapeutic methods have been proposed for the management of acute radiation reactions of the oral mucosa. Frequently, their efficacy has been established for chemotherapy or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. Hence, systematical rather than local effects have to be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, prophylaxis of oral mucositis is mainly based on dental restoration or edentation, in combination with frequent oral hygienic measures after the meals and with antiseptic mouthwashes. Intensive personal care is recommended. The necessity of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostoma is dependent on the status of the patient and on size and localization of the treatment area, i.e. the impairment of food uptake which is to be expected. Therapeutic intervention is restricted to local or systemic treatment of pain and local application of antimycotics and antibiotics.

Modulatory effect of esophageal intraluminal mechanical and chemical stressors on salivary prostaglandin E2 in humans

As has been demonstrated, infusion of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and pepsin into the human esophageal lumen, which mimics the natural gastroesophageal reflux, results in a significant increase in salivary volume, salivary bicarbonate and epidermal growth factor. However, the impact of intraluminal acid/pepsin solution on salivary prostaglandin E2 (sPGE2), the major protective factor of the upper alimentary tract, has never been explored. Therefore, using the newly developed esophageal perfusion model, the impact of both mechanical and chemical stimuli of the esophagus on sPGE2 secretion in humans was studied. Salivary PGE2 was assessed in saliva collected during basal conditions, chewing of parafilm, placement of intraesophageal tubing, inflation of intraesophageal balloons, and perfusion with sodium chloride, HCl, or HCl/pepsin solutions. The concentration of sPGE2 was measured using the RIA kit from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL) after the solid-phase extraction and derivatization. The concentration of sPGE2 in the basal saliva was (mean +/- standard error of mean) 186 +/- 31 pg/mL and was similar during the chewing of parafilm (171 +/- 32 pg/mL). The placement of intraesophageal tubing, however, resulted in a significant decline of sPGE2 concentration to the value of 91 +/- 22 pg/mL (P < 0.01). This decline was maintained when intraesophageal balloons, which compartmentalized a 7.5 cm perfused segment of the esophagus, were inflated (86 +/- 17 pg/mL; P < 0.01). This decline was potentiated further when subsequent perfusion with saline was implemented to reach the lowest value of 46 +/- 17 pg/mL (P < 0.001 versus basal and P < 0.05 versus tubing and balloon evoked values) at the end of the perfusing procedure. Esophageal perfusion with acid and acid/pepsin solution, however, partly restored the significant decline in sPGE2 concentration observed during prolonged perfusion with saline. The sPGE2 output during basal conditions was 89 +/- 13 pg/min and increased dramatically during stimulation by placement of intraesophageal tubing (241 +/- 48 pg/min; P < 0.01) and inflation of intraesophageal balloons (244 +/- 48 pg/min; P < 0.01). Subsequent esophageal perfusion with saline resulted in a gradual decline of sPGE2 output evoked by mechanical stimuli that reached the final value of 178 +/- 39, which was not significantly different from that observed in the basal condition (P < 0.1 versus basal value). Introduction of HCl and pepsin into the perfusing solution significantly prevented the decline of sPGE2 output observed during perfusion with saline (252 +/- 36 pg/min; P < 0.01 versus basal). The modulatory impact of mechanical and chemical stimulation on sPGE2, demonstrated for the first time in humans, may suggest the potential contribution of salivary prostanoids to the maintenance of the integrity of the esophageal mucosa.

Morphology and pathology of radiation-induced esophagitis. Double-blind study of naproxen vs placebo for prevention of radiation injury

Radiation-induced esophagitis can cause substantial morbidity. Experiments in lab animals have shown that pretreatment with indomethacin protects the esophagus from radiation damage. We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of naproxen vs placebo in patients undergoing thoracic radiation therapy for lung cancer. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, of which 26 completed the study. Sixteen patients were given a short course of radiation (30 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks), and 10 patients were given a longer course and a larger dose (40-50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks). Half of the irradiated patients were treated with naproxen, 375 mg, taken orally twice a day, and half were given an identical placebo. All patients were given ranitidine 300 mg, taken orally once a day. Study drugs were taken throughout the course of radiation. Endoscopy with esophageal biopsies and brushings was performed before and on the last day of treatment. Patients kept a daily diary for symptom scoring. Symptoms such as chest pain, dysphagia, odynophagia, and/or heartburn were reported in 15 patients from both subgroups, resulting in diet restriction to liquids only in eight patients and requiring temporary discontinuation of radiation therapy in one of them. Approximately half the patients in each subgroup developed esophagitis, usually mild and usually limited to the proximal esophagus. Severity of symptoms was not proportional to the severity of esophagitis. Candidiasis was documented in eight patients, but only four had symptoms that were severe in one. We conclude that acute radiation injury to the esophagus is observed in approximately half the patients receiving radiation therapy and can result in substantial morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

On radiation damage to normal tissues and its treatment. II. Anti-inflammatory drugs

In addition to transiently inhibiting cell cycle progression and sterilizing those cells capable of proliferation, irradiation disturbs the homeostasis effected by endogenous mediators of intercellular communication (humoral component of tissue response to radiation). Changes in the mediator levels may modulate radiation effects either by assisting a return to normality (e.g., through a rise in H-type cell lineage-specific growth factors) or by aggravating the damage. The latter mode is illustrated with reports on changes in eicosanoid levels after irradiation and on results of empirical treatment of radiation injuries with anti-inflammatory drugs. Prodromal, acute and chronic effects of radiation are accompanied by excessive production of eicosanoids (prostaglandins, prostacyclin, thromboxanes and leukotrienes). These endogenous mediators of inflammatory reactions may be responsible for the vasodilatation, vasoconstriction, increased microvascular permeability, thrombosis and chemotaxis observed after radiation exposure. Glucocorticoids inhibit eicosanoid synthesis primarily by interfering with phospholipase A2 whilst non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prevent prostaglandin/thromboxane synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase. When administered after irradiation on empirical grounds, drugs belonging to both groups tend to attenuate a range of prodromal, acute and chronic effects of radiation in man and animals. Taken together, these two sets of observations are highly suggestive of a contribution of humoral factors to the adverse responses of normal tissues and organs to radiation. A full account of radiation damage should therefore consist of complementary descriptions of cellular and humoral events. Further studies on anti-inflammatory drug treatment of radiation damage to normal organs are justified and desirable.

The modulation of radiation-induced damage to pig skin by essential fatty acids

The ability of essential fatty acids (EFAs) to modulate radiation-induced normal tissue injury was assessed in pig skin. Female Large White pigs (approximately 25 Kg) received 3 ml/day orally of either an 'active' oil [So-1100, containing 9% gamma-linolenic acid (GLA)] or a 'placebo' oil (So-1129) for just 4 weeks before or for 4 weeks before and for 16 weeks after irradiation; localised irradiation of skin was with single doses of beta-rays from 22.5 mm diameter 90Sr/90Y plaques. The severity of the acute reaction, assessed in terms of erythema or moist desquamation, was significantly less in those pigs that received So-1100 both before and after irradiation, as compared with those receiving that oil only prior to irradiation and the 'placebo' groups. Dose modification factors (DMFs) of between 1.13-1.24 were obtained. A similar reduction in the severity of acute skin injury was seen in pigs receiving So-1100 for only 10 weeks after irradiation. Late skin damage, assessed in terms of late erythema or dermal necrosis, was also reduced with So-1100, with DMFs of 1.14-1.51. No such modification was observed if So-1100 was only administered for 4 weeks prior to irradiation. No adverse side-effects were apparent as a result of EFA administration. So-1100 may represent a safe and valuable method of increasing the therapeutic gain in radiotherapy.

The effect of indomethacin on acute radiation induced gastrointestinal injury: a morphologic study

Radiation-induced intestinal injury is a dose limiting factor in the treatment of pelvic, abdominal, and retroperitoneal malignancies with radiation therapy. In experimental models, radiation has been associated with increased intestinal prostaglandin activity and in clinical trials prostaglandin inhibitors have been demonstrated to improve the symptoms of acute radiation enteritis. This study was conducted to determine if the prostaglandin inhibitor indomethacin could prevent the morphologic changes of acute radiation induced intestinal injury. Twenty-four male rats received either parenteral indomethacin at doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg per dose every 12 hours or saline from 24 hours pre-radiation exposure until sacrifice 48 hours later. Twenty-four control animals received identical drug dosages and anesthesia but no radiation. Radiation produced a decreased villus/crypt ratio and increased acute inflammation and degeneration. Indomethacin treated animals demonstrated significantly less polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration and decreased degeneration. Villus/crypt ratio was not affected by indomethacin.