Diagnosis of anal carcinoma--doctor's finger still the best?

Two cases of anal squamous cell carcinoma achieving complete response after docetaxel + cisplatin + S-1 (DCS) induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is an uncommon tumor. However, its incidence is increasing worldwide. Surgical resection of locally advanced cases requires permanent anal prosthesis. Thus, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is preferred as the first-line treatment; however, high local recurrence rate remains an issue. Here, we describe two cases of locally advanced ASCC treated with docetaxel + cisplatin + S-1 (DCS) followed by CRT with S-1 that showed complete response. The two patients, aged 69 and 65 years, were diagnosed with ASCC (cStage IIIB) at our hospital. Due to extensive lymph node metastases, the patients were treated with triple induction chemotherapy (DCS) followed by CRT with S-1. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography performed six months after starting the treatment showed disappearance of tumors, indicating a complete response. The patients continued to receive S-1 for one year and achieved relapse-free long-term survival since the completion of treatment. Therefore, induction chemotherapy with DCS, prior to CRT with S-1 may benefit patients with locally advanced ASCC.

Definitive Radiotherapy for Patients With Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Anal squamous cell carcinoma accounts for less than 2-3% of all digestive system carcinomas. The present study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients at our institution.

Methodology

We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with definitive radiotherapy in our department between July 2009 and July 2020. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8-2 Gy daily fractions to a whole pelvic dose ranging from 45 to 50 Gy, followed by boost radiotherapy of 10-15 Gy, resulting in a total dose of approximately 60 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy included 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C or 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin.

Results

A total of 14 patients with a median age of 61.5 years (range: 45-85 years) were analyzed. There were nine women and five men. The clinical T stage was T1 in two patients, T2 in six patients, T3 in two patients, and T4 in four patients. The clinical N stage was N0 in four patients and N1 in 10 patients. Patients with clinical stage III disease comprised 79% of the entire study population. For the entire cohort, the five-year overall survival rate was 83.3% and the five-year progression-free survival rate was 48.5%. One patient experienced grade 3 fecal incontinence, and the others experienced no radiation-induced severe delayed adverse events.

Conclusions

The results of our study demonstrated that definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma is an effective and feasible treatment.

A CARE-compliant article: a case report of primary adenocarcinoma of the anal glands: Review of literature

RATIONALE

Adenocarcinoma of the anal canal is an uncommon malignancy. Primary adenocarcinoma, in particular, is extremely rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 61-year-old man was referred to our institution with complaints of repeated hematochezia.

DIAGNOSIS

Digital rectal examination revealed a hard palpable ulcer in the anal canal, measuring 2 cm × 2 cm in size, at the 5 o'clock direction (in the lithotomy position). The pelvic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed anal verge occupying mass. A diagnosis of carcinoma of the anal canal was considered. Colonoscopic examination revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the anal canal.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) of the rectum, and was administered 6 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX.

OUTCOMES

The patient was followed up for more than 1 year after operation, and no local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred.

LESSONS

The diagnosis and treatment of this disease is still a huge challenge because its incidence is very low. A study of more cases is required for uniformity in diagnosis and for the development of treatment protocols.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare cancer and accounts for approximately 4% of all cancers of the lower alimentary tract. The dominant etiology is infection with human papilloma virus (HPV), which is the most common sexually transmitted disease in the United States. Integration of HPV DNA into the host genome seems to be the driving mechanism behind carcinogenesis. Vaccines directed against oncogenic HPV serotypes exist, and their utility for preventing anal neoplasia is under investigation. Additional risk factors for developing SCC include HIV infection, anal receptive intercourse, smoking, and immunosuppression. Patients with known anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) must be carefully screened with periodic digital rectal exam and anoscopy. The most common presenting symptom is bleeding, with up to one third of patients presenting asymptomatic. Once tissue diagnosis is made, staging of primary tumor is accomplished with either MRI or transanal ultrasound. Distant disease is evaluated with CT of chest abdomen and pelvis vs whole body PET/CT. The gold standard treatment for stage I-III disease remains the Nigro protocol, first described in 1974. Stage I disease not involving sphincter may be treated with local excision. Distant disease is treated with systemic chemotherapy with radiation reserved for locoregional symptoms. Careful surveillance is mandatory after completion of chemoradiation. Salvage abdominoperineal resection can achieve locoregional control in up to 77% of patients with persistent or recurrent disease. Morbidity is high, mostly owing to wound complications, and as such a flap reconstruction of the perineum is warranted.

Management of precancerous anal intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) are at disproportionately high risk for anal cancer. There is no definitive approach to the management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), which are precursors of anal cancer, and evidence suggests that posttreatment adjuvant quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccination improves HSIL treatment effectiveness. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the optimal HSIL management strategy with respect to clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and to identify the optimal age for initiating HSIL management.

METHODS

A decision analytic model of the natural history of anal carcinoma and HSIL management strategies was constructed for HIV-positive MSM who were 27 years old or older. The model was informed by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and published studies. Outcomes included the lifetime cost, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, cumulative risk of cancer and cancer-related deaths, and cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective.

RESULTS

Active monitoring was the most effective approach in patients 29 years or younger; thereafter, HSIL treatment plus adjuvant qHPV vaccination became most effective. When cost-effectiveness was considered (ie, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] < $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year), do nothing was cost-effective until the age of 38 years, and HSIL treatment plus adjuvant qHPV vaccination was cost-effective beyond the age of 38 years (95% confidence interval, 34-43 years). The ICER decreased as the age at HSIL management increased. Outcomes were sensitive to the rate of HSIL regression or progression and the cost of high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of HSIL in HIV-positive MSM who are 38 years old or older with treatment plus adjuvant qHPV vaccination is likely to be cost-effective. The conservative approach of no treatment is likely to be cost-effective in younger patients. Cancer 2017;123:4709-4719. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Review: Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex with Men: Is Screening and Treatment Justified?

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been detected in over 90% of anal carcinoma biopsy specimens from MSM, and is considered a necessary, but alone, insufficient factor for carcinogenesis. Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) may be precursive for SCC, and screening cytology with referral of persons with abnormality for high-resolution anoscopy-guided biopsy, and AIN treatment, has been recommended for prevention. In the absence of either randomized controlled trials or surveillance data demonstrating a reduction in anal SCC incidence, these recommendations were based on analogy with cervical cancer. HPV-mediated genetic changes associated with cervical cancer, and aneuploidy, have been documented in AIN. However, little data exist on the rate of AIN progression to SCC. The treatment of AIN is frequently prolonged and not curative, and if routinized in the care of HIV-infected MSM, would likely be recurring well into their sixth decade of life. Clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in invasive anal carcinoma incidence, as well as acceptable morbidity with repeated AIN destruction, are needed before asking our patients to commit to routine treatment.

Anal cancer: current standards in care and recent changes in practice

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The management of squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal has evolved from surgery as first-line treatment to curative chemoradiation, with surgery reserved for salvage. Significant progress has been made in understanding how to most effectively deliver chemotherapy and reduce toxicity through advancements in radiation delivery. The purpose of this article is to review the multimodality approach to the diagnosis and management of anal cancer based on a review of the published data and in light of available guidelines.

Premalignant lesions of the anal canal and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare tumor. However, its incidence has been increasing in men and women over the past 25 years worldwide. Risk factors associated with this cancer are those behaviors that predispose individuals to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and immunosuppression. Anal cancer is generally preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), which is most prevalent in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men. High-risk patients may benefit from screening. The most common presentation is rectal bleeding, which is present in nearly 50% of patients. Twenty percent of patients have no symptoms at the time of presentation. Clinical staging of anal cancer requires a digital rectal exam and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Endorectal/endoanal ultrasound appears to add more-specific staging information when compared with digital rectal examination alone. Treatment of anal cancer prior to the 1970s involved an abdominoperineal resection. However, the current standard of care for localized anal cancer is concurrent chemoradiation therapy, primarily because of its sphincter-saving and colostomy-sparing potential. Studies have addressed alternative chemoradiation regimens to improve the standard protocol of fluorouracil, misogynic, and radiation, but no alternative regimen has proven superior. Surgery is reserved for those patients with residual disease or recurrence.

Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Colorectal cancer is a major global health problem, with survival varying according to stage at diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can result from patient, practitioner or hospital delay. This paper reports the results of a review of the factors influencing pre-hospital delay - the time between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care or between first presentation and referral to secondary care. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Fifty-four studies were included. Patients' non-recognition of symptom seriousness increased delay, as did symptom denial. Patient delay was greater for rectal than colon cancers and the presence of more serious symptoms, such as pain, reduced delay. There appears to be no relationship between delay and patients' age, sex or socioeconomic status. Initial misdiagnosis, inadequate examination and inaccurate investigations increased practitioner delay. Use of referral guidelines may reduce delay, although evidence is currently limited. No intervention studies were identified. If delayed diagnosis is to be reduced, there must be increased recognition of the significance of symptoms among patients, and development and evaluation of interventions that are designed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and examination by practitioners.

Anal cancer: an overview

Anal cancer is a rare tumor with an incidence that has been rising over the last 25 years. The disease was once thought to develop as a result of chronic irritation, but it is now known that this is not the case. Multiple risk factors, including human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, anoreceptive intercourse, cigarette smoking, and immunosuppression, have been identified. HIV infection is also associated with anal cancer; there is a higher incidence in HIV-positive patients but the direct relationship between HIV and anal cancer has been difficult to separate from the prevalence of HPV in this population. HIV infection is also associated with anal cancer; there are increasing numbers of HIV-positive patients being diagnosed with the disease. Treatment of anal cancer prior to the 1970s involved abdominoperineal resection, but the standard of care is now concurrent chemoradiation therapy, with surgery reserved for those patients with residual disease. We present a case of anal cancer followed by a general discussion of both risk factors and treatment.

Pathological staging of epidermoid anal carcinoma for the new era

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for most patients with epidermoid anal cancer. Pre-treatment staging is based on size for T1-T3 lesions and clinical and radiological assessment of adjacent organ invasion for T4 lesions. For patients with residual or recurrent carcinoma, anorectal excision offers the best chance of oncological salvage. Pathological staging systems for anorectal excision specimens were validated at the time when surgical treatment was first line therapy. A validated staging system is necessary for salvage surgical excision specimens following an attempt to cure by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the purpose of prognosis and further treatment planning.

Malignant anal tumours

Anal tumours represent 5 per cent of anorectal cancers and exist as two clinical entities: tumours of the anal canal and those of the anal margin. Smoking and sexual behaviour, particularly homosexual anal intercourse, are important aetiological factors. This association is related to anal warts and human papillomavirus infection, notably type 16, which is found in around 70 per cent of warts. Symptoms are non-specific and are frequently attributed to benign conditions. Rectal examination reveals a characteristically infiltrating lesion and any suspicious anal area should be biopsied. There are two histological types. Squamous carcinoma comprises approximately 95 per cent of anal tumours and includes the 35 per cent of tumours derived from the anal transition zone (cloacogenic tumours), containing a mixture of squamous and mucinous elements. The remaining 5 per cent of anal tumours are adenocarcinoma. Squamous cell tumours of the anal canal are probably best treated using radiotherapy (with chemotherapy) as complete response rates, 5-year survival rates, and incidences of normal sphincter function and significant toxicity are around 80, 70, 75 and 20 per cent respectively. Treatment failures may be salvaged by surgery. The 5-year survival and local recurrence rates for radical surgery are around 60 and 25 per cent respectively; there are few indications for local excision. In contrast, 60 per cent of anal margin tumours are suitable for local excision, the 5-year survival rate being in excess of 80 per cent. Combining radiotherapy with surgery may give additional benefit. Current randomized controlled trials should further clarify the relative merits and demerits of the treatment options.

Diagnosis and treatment of anal carcinoma. An overview

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal gives early symptoms and is easy to diagnose. However, these patients often present with advanced tumours, probably because of patient's and/or doctor's delay. The diagnosis must be confirmed by a conclusive biopsy as the treatment of ano-rectal tumours is based upon correct histopathological diagnosis. Loco-regional tumour control of squamous cell carcinoma is excellent following radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy as only 10-20% of the patients develop a local recurrence. The great majority of these are cured by abdominoperineal resection. However, this treatment involves considerable acute and chronic toxicity, but mortality is less than 2%. There is no general agreement about how to minimize toxicity without hazarding loco-regional tumour control. One way could be to irradiate only the primary tumour site in patients with early lesions, and reserve radiotherapy of regional lymph nodes for more advanced cases. About 20% of the patients develop distant metastases, which make the disease incurable. Hence, frequent, rectal digital examination is the most important follow-up since early local recurrences can easily be cured. There is no general consensus concerning adjuvant chemotherapy, but its potential should be further explored.