Stability of efferent-mediated protection against acoustic overexposure with long maintenance under barbiturate anaesthesia

Bandwidth determines modulatory effects of centrifugal pathways on cochlear hearing desensitization caused by loud sound

Centrifugal olivocochlear (OC) pathways modulate cochlear hearing losses induced in cats by loud sounds varying in bandwidth from tones to clicks and noise bands, in a variety of conditions. The general effect, always to reduce hearing damage, can be a net effect resulting from complex interactions between OC subcomponents (crossed and uncrossed OC pathways). The interactions between these subcomponents vary with type of loud sound, suggesting that sound bandwidth may be important in determining how OC pathways modulate loud sound-induced hearing loss. This dependency was examined and here it is reported that OC pathways do not alter cochlear hearing losses caused by loud noise with a 2-kHz-wide bandwidth intermediate between the loud sounds of previous studies. Increasing stimulus bandwidth even slightly more, to use a loud 3.5-kHz-wide bandwidth noise as the damaging sound, once again revealed OC modulation of cochlear hearing loss. The fact that OC pathways do not modulate cochlear hearing losses induced by loud 2-kHz-wide noise was demonstrated in three very different test conditions in which OC pathways modulate hearing losses caused by narrower or broader bandwidth sounds. This confirmed that the absence of centrifugal modulation of hearing loss to this particular sound was a robust phenomenon not related to test condition. The absence of overall centrifugal effects was also true at the level of subcomponent pathways; neither crossed nor uncrossed OC pathways individually modulated cochlear hearing losses to the loud 2-kHz-wide noise. This surprising frequency dependency has general implications for centrifugal modulation of cochlear responses.

Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system

The medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system is an important component of an active mechanical outer hair cell system in mammals. An extensive neurophysiological literature demonstrates that the MOC system attenuates the response of the cochlea to sound by reducing the gain of the outer hair cell mechanical response to stimulation. Despite a growing understanding of MOC physiology, the biological role of the MOC system in mammalian audition remains uncertain. Some evidence suggests that the MOC system functions in a protective role by acting to reduce receptor damage during intense acoustic exposure. For the MOC system to have evolved as a protective mechanism, however, the inner ears of mammals must be exposed to potentially damaging sources of noise that can elicit MOC-mediated protective effects under natural conditions. In this review, we evaluate the possibility that the MOC system evolved to protect the inner ear from naturally occurring environmental noise. Our survey of nonanthropogenic noise levels shows that while sustained sources of broadband noise are found in nearly all natural acoustic environments, frequency-averaged ambient noise levels in these environments rarely exceed 70 dB SPL. Similarly, sources reporting ambient noise spectra in natural acoustic environments suggest that noise levels within narrow frequency bands are typically low in intensity (<40 dB SPL). Only in rare instances (e.g., during frog choruses) are ambient noise levels sustained at moderately high intensities (~70-90 dB SPL). By contrast, all experiments in which an MOC-mediated protective effect was demonstrated used much higher sound intensities to traumatize the cochlea (100-150 dB SPL). This substantial difference between natural ambient noise levels and the experimental conditions necessary to evoke MOC-mediated protection suggests that even the noisiest natural acoustic environments are not sufficiently intense to have selected for the evolution of the MOC system as a protective mechanism. Furthermore, although relatively intense noise environments do exist in nature, they are insufficiently distributed to account for the widespread distribution of the MOC system in mammals. The paucity of high-intensity noise and the near ubiquity of low-level noise in natural environments supports the hypothesis that the MOC system evolved as a mechanism for "unmasking" biologically significant acoustic stimuli by reducing the response of the cochlea to simultaneous low-level noise. This suggested role enjoys widespread experimental support.

Evaluating the protective role of the olivocochlear bundle against acoustic overexposure in rats by using Fos immunohistochemistry

Efferent inhibition on the cochlea is suggested as a possible function of the olivocochlear bundle (OCB). Substantial evidence supports the finding that the OCB may protect the inner ear from noise-induced damage. However, there is relatively less known about the effects of noise on the central auditory transmission compared to the effects on the periphery. In the present animal study, two experimental paradigms were designed to analyze the influence of OCB lesion on the central auditory transmission following acoustic overexposure. In order to evaluate the animal's auditory function, its hearing threshold and the tone-evoked Fos expression shown in auditory nuclei were examined. Fos is a protein product of proto-oncogene c-fos. Via appropriate acoustic stimulation, Fos expression reveals the activated neuronal elements along the ascending auditory pathway. Thus, in experiment 1, no exposure sound was introduced and therefore no significant differences were shown in hearing thresholds and Fos expression among all rats, regardless of the status of their OCB. This result indicates that, without acoustic overexposure, OCB lesion caused no significant effect on brainstem auditory transmission. In contrast, in experiment 2, rats were exposed to continuous 8 kHz tones at 85 dB sound pressure level (SPL). A significantly increasing threshold was observed in rats with OCB lesion following an exposure period of 5 or 10 days. In addition, Fos expression was invisible first in rats with OCB lesion following 5-day exposure and almost no Fos expression could be examined in all rats after 10-day exposure. Taken together, the present data demonstrate that damaging the OCB renders an animal more easily vulnerable to acoustic damage than that of rat with intact OCB, and then reduces its cochlear activities, which eventually leads to increasing difficulty to induce tone-evoked Fos expression along the ascending auditory pathway.