The epithelial barrier function in clear corneal grafts

Corneal barrier function, tear film stability, and corneal sensation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To compare corneal sensation, corneal barrier function, tear secretion, and tear film stability after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 28 eyes of 15 patients underwent PRK and 115 eyes of 59 patients underwent LASIK to correct myopia. Corneal sensation, corneal epithelial barrier function, tear secretion, and tear film stability were examined preoperatively and 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery.

RESULTS

Both PRK and LASIK significantly compromised corneal sensation, increased epithelial barrier function, reduced tear secretion, and deteriorated tear film stability (P < .05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Deterioration of corneal sensation was significantly greater after LASIK than after PRK by 3 months postoperatively (P < .05, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Increases in corneal epithelial permeability were more prolonged after LASIK than after PRK. A significant intergroup difference in permeability was observed 1 month after surgery (P < .01). Tear breakup time was significantly shorter in the LASIK group than in the PRK group up to 3 months after surgery (P < .045).

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK induces greater and more prolonged damage to corneal sensation, corneal barrier function, and tear film stability than PRK.

Corneal epithelial recovery following photorefractive keratectomy

AIMS

To further understand the morphological and functional recovery of corneal epithelium following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

The right eyes (group 1) of 15 male, New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2-3 kg underwent PRK. The left eye of each rabbit (group 2) underwent simple mechanical de-epithelialisation and were examined as treated controls. Both eyes of another eight rabbits (group 3) served as untreated controls. All eyes underwent a corneal epithelial permeability study by fluorophotometry at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery. Five animals in groups 1 and 2 were sacrificed at 9, 10, and 12 weeks after surgery. The animals in group 3 were sacrificed at the end of the 12 week experimental period. Both eyes of each sacrificed animal were enucleated immediately and processed for both haematoxylin and eosin stain and electron microscopic study. The electron micrograph was magnified to 14,000x and the extent of hemidesmosome formation was quantified and analysed.

RESULTS

The corneal epithelial barrier to sodium fluorescein was subnormal and returned to a normal barrier state 4 weeks after PRK in group 1 whereas it was normal in group 2 throughout the examination period. The extent of hemidesmosome formation was abundant yet subnormal in both groups 1 and 2 up to 12 weeks, when compared with that in group 3.

CONCLUSION

The corneal epithelium regained its functional barrier 4 weeks after PRK in rabbits while the extent of hemidesmosome formation was still subnormal 12 weeks after mechanical de-epithelialisation, with or without PRK.