Standardized rater training for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD₁₇) and the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS(C30))

Routinely accessible parameters of mineralocorticoid receptor function, depression subtypes and response prediction: a post-hoc analysis from the early medication change trial in major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies indicated a relationship between aldosterone, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and antidepressant treatment outcome. Physiological indicators of MR function (blood pressure and electrolytes) are easily accessible and may therefore serve as useful predictors. Thus, our aim was to investigate the predictive value of peripheral MR-related markers for antidepressant treatment outcomes.

METHODS

826 MDD patients who had participated in the randomised-controlled Early Medication Change (EMC) trial were analysed. Depression severity and MR-related markers were assessed weekly. In 562 patients, genetic variation of five MR-related genes was determined.

RESULTS

Patients with blood pressure <120mmHg showed higher depression severity (p = 0.005) than patients with blood pressure ≥120mmHg. Patients with a melancholic subtype had significantly lower blood pressures (p = 0.004). Na⁺/K⁺ ratio was positively and K⁺-concentration was negatively correlated to depression severity and to relative changes in HAMD from baseline to day 14, and 56 respectively (p < 0.001). For none of the MR-related genes, genetic variation was associated with treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed early observations of an altered peripheral MR sensitivity, reflected by lower blood pressure, low K⁺ or high Na⁺/K⁺ ratio in patients with more severe depression. These routinely collected biomarkers may potentially be useful for risk stratification in an early stage of treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974155; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT00974155.

Epigenetic signatures in antidepressant treatment response: a methylome-wide association study in the EMC trial

Although the currently available antidepressants are well established in the treatment of the major depressive disorder (MDD), there is strong variability in the response of individual patients. Reliable predictors to guide treatment decisions before or in an early stage of treatment are needed. DNA-methylation has been proven a useful biomarker in different clinical conditions, but its importance for mechanisms of antidepressant response has not yet been determined. 80 MDD patients were selected out of >500 participants from the Early Medication Change (EMC) cohort with available genetic material based on their antidepressant response after four weeks and stratified into clear responders and age- and sex-matched non-responders (N = 40, each). Early improvement after two weeks was analyzed as a secondary outcome. DNA-methylation was determined using the Illumina EPIC BeadChip. Epigenome-wide association studies were performed and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) identified using the comb-p algorithm. Enrichment was tested for hallmark gene-sets and in genome-wide association studies of depression and antidepressant response. No epigenome-wide significant differentially methylated positions were found for treatment response or early improvement. Twenty DMRs were associated with response; the strongest in an enhancer region in SORBS2, which has been related to cardiovascular diseases and type II diabetes. Another DMR was located in CYP2C18, a gene previously linked to antidepressant response. Results pointed towards differential methylation in genes associated with cardiac function, neuroticism, and depression. Linking differential methylation to antidepressant treatment response is an emerging topic and represents a step towards personalized medicine, potentially facilitating the prediction of patients' response before treatment.

Interrater reliability in the assessment of physiotherapy students

BACKGROUND

Reliable and objective assessment of psychomotor skills in physiotherapy students' education is essential for direct feedback and skill improvement. The aim of this study is to determine the interrater reliability in the assessment process of physiotherapy students and to analyse the assessment behaviour of the examiners.

METHODS

Physiotherapy teachers from two different schools assessed students from two different schools performing proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) patterns. An evaluation sheet with a 6-point rating scale and 20 evaluation criteria including an overall rating was used for assessment. The interrater reliability was determined calculating an intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) and Krippendorff's alpha. The assessment behaviour of the examiners was further analysed calculating the location parameters and showing the item response distribution over item in form of a Likert plot.

RESULTS

The ICC estimates were mostly below 0.4, indicating poor interrater reliability. This was confirmed by Krippendorff's alpha. The examiners showed a certain central tendency and intergroup bias.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The interrater reliability in this assessment format was rather low. No difference between the two physiotherapy schools concerning the interrater reliability could be identified. Despite certain limitations of this study, there is a definite need for improvement of the assessment process in physiotherapy education to provide the students with reliable and objective feedback and ensure a certain level of professional competence in the students.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University (EK 340/16).

The Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties of Different Versions

The format of the original Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was unstructured: only general instructions were provided for rating individual items. Over the years, a number of modified versions of the HAM-D have been proposed. They differ not only in the number of items, but also in modalities of administration. Structured versions, including item definitions, anchor points and semi-structured or structured interview questions, were developed. This comprehensive review was conducted to examine the clinimetric properties of the different versions of the HAM-D. The aim was to identify the HAM-D versions that best display the clinimetric properties of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The search was conducted on MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, and yielded a total of 35,473 citations, but only the most representative studies were included. The structured versions of the HAM-D were found to display the highest inter-rater and test-retest reliability. The Clinical Interview for Depression and the 6-item HAM-D showed the highest sensitivity in differentiating active treatment from placebo. The findings indicate that the HAM-D is a valid and sensitive clinimetric index, which should not be discarded in view of obsolete and not clinically relevant psychometric criteria. The HAM-D, however, requires an informed use: unstructured forms should be avoided and the type of HAM-D version that is selected should be specified in the registration of the study protocol and in the methods of the trial.

Effects of age on depressive symptomatology and response to antidepressant treatment in patients with major depressive disorder aged 18 to 65 years

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that symptomatology in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) changes with age. However, studies comparing depressive symptomatology between different age groups during antidepressant therapy are rare. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics in depressed patients of different age groups at baseline and during treatment.

METHODS

889 MDD inpatients were divided into four age groups (18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-65 yrs.). Demographic and clinical characteristics including depressive symptomatology (assessed by the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms) were assessed at baseline and weekly during treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, young patients (18-29 years) significantly more often reported cognitive symptoms like irritability, suicidality, negative self-concept and interpersonal sensitivity and more often suffered from drug abuse and comorbid personality disorders. Late middle aged patients (50-65 years) significantly more often suffered from neuro-vegetative symptoms such as reduced general interest, sexual interest and sleep disturbances and more often showed a recurrent MDD and comorbid physical disorders. During therapy, symptoms such as interpersonal sensitivity in young patients and low interest in sex in late middle aged patients persisted until the end of treatment while all other symptoms declined until day 56.

LIMITATIONS

The herein presented age differences in depressive symptomatology only hold true for the study medication and are not generalizable to other antidepressants agents.

CONCLUSION

There are substantial differences in the clinical presentation of depression between age groups. Whereas many of these differences disappear during treatment, some differences persisted until the end of treatment. These findings my help to more specifically tailor the treatment of depressed patients.

Higher BDNF plasma levels are associated with a normalization of memory dysfunctions during an antidepressant treatment

One important symptom of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) is memory dysfunction. However, little is known about the relationship between memory performance and depression severity, about the course of memory performance during antidepressant treatment as well as about the relationship between memory performance and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Memory function [learning and delayed recall) was assessed in 173 MDD patients (mean age 39.7 ± 11.3 years] treated by a pre-defined treatment algorithm within the early medication change (EMC) study at baseline, days 28 and 56. Depression severity was assessed in weekly intervals, BDNF plasma levels were measured at baseline, days 14 and 56, BDNF exon IV and p11 methylation status at baseline. Linear mixed regression models revealed that the course of depression severity was not associated with the course of learning or delayed recall in the total group. 63 (36%) of the investigated patients showed memory deficits (percent range ≤ 16) at baseline. Of those, 26(41%) patients experienced a normalization of their memory deficits during treatment. Patients with a normalization of their delayed recall performance had significantly higher plasma BDNF levels (p = 0.040) from baseline to day 56 than patients with persistent deficits. Baseline BDNF exon IV promoter and p11 gene methylation status were not associated with memory performance. Our results corroborate a concomitant amelioration of learning and delayed recall dysfunctions with successful antidepressant therapy in a subgroup of patients and support a role of BDNF in the neural mechanisms underlying the normalization of memory dysfunctions in MDD. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00974155; EudraCT: 2008-008280-96.

Body mass index (BMI) in major depressive disorder and its effects on depressive symptomatology and antidepressant response

BACKGROUND

Obesity is one of the most prevalent somatic comorbidities of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). We aimed to investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and MDD, the symptomatology of the disorder as well as the outcome of antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

Early medication change (EMC) trial participants with BMI measurement (n = 811) were categorized according to WHO-criteria in normal or low weight (BMI < 25), overweight (25-< 30), and obese (≥30). Depression severity and BMI was assessed in weekly intervals up to 8 weeks. BMI at baseline and course of BMI during the study were investigated in linear regression models as possible moderators of therapy response. Possible moderators such as plasma concentrations of applied drugs, sex, comorbidities or age were controlled.

RESULTS

388 (48%) patients showed normal weight, 251 (31%) were overweight and 172 (21%) obese. Linear regression analyses revealed an association between BMI and antidepressant therapy outcome: Overweight patients showed the best response to antidepressant treatment. BMI at baseline was significantly correlated with improvement in neurovegetative and cognitive symptoms of depression. Furthermore, weight gain during the study was associated with better therapy response, independent of symptom complex. Other moderators including serum concentrations of drugs were not able to explain the differences between the BMI groups.

LIMITATIONS

Secondary exploratory analysis. No investigation of visceral fat.

CONCLUSION

We showed for the first time that patients with higher initial increase in BMI showed larger decrease in depression severity during study. The underlying mechanisms are unclear and require further investigation.

Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (pBDNF) and executive dysfunctions in patients with major depressive disorder

Objectives: Executive dysfunctions are frequently seen in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and normalise in many cases during effective antidepressant therapy. This study investigated whether a normalisation of executive dysfunctions during antidepressant treatment correlates with or can be predicted by clinical parameters or levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).Methods: In 110 MDD patients with executive dysfunctions (percentile <16), executive functions and plasma BDNF levels were analysed at baseline, and days 14 and 56 of an antidepressant treatment. BDNF exon IV and P11 methylation status was studied at baseline.Results: Eighty patients (73%) experienced a normalisation of executive dysfunctions, while 30 (27%) suffered from persistent dysfunctions until day 56. Patients with persistent dysfunctions had significantly higher HAMD scores at days 14 and 56, and lower plasma BDNF levels at each time point than patients with a normalisation of dysfunctions (F₁= 10.18; P = 0.002). This was seen for verbal fluency, but not processing speed. BDNF exon IV and p11 promoter methylation was not associated with test performance.Conclusions: Our results corroborate a concomitant amelioration of executive dysfunctions with successful antidepressant therapy and support a role of BDNF in the neural mechanisms underlying the normalisation of executive dysfunctions in MDD.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00974155; EudraCT: 2008-008280-96.

Predictors of the effectiveness of an early medication change strategy in patients with major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who are non-improvers after two weeks of antidepressant treatment have a high risk of treatment failure. Recently, we did not find differences in outcomes in non-improvers randomized to an early medication change (EMC) strategy compared to treatment as usual (TAU). This secondary analysis investigated possible predictors of higher remission rates in the EMC strategy.

METHODS

Of 192 non-improvers (i.e. decrease of ≤20% on the HAMD-17 depression scale) after a two-week treatment with escitalopram, n = 97 were randomized to EMC (immediate switch to high doses of venlafaxine XR) and n = 95 to TAU (continued escitalopram until day 28 with non-responders switched to venlafaxine XR). We first analyzed patient characteristics, psychopathological features and subtypes of MDD by logistic regression analyses as possible predictors of remission rates. In a second investigation, we analyzed the predictors, which showed a significant association in the first analysis before Bonferroni-Holm correction by chi-squared tests separated for treatment groups. All analyses were corrected by Bonferroni-Holm method.

RESULTS

The first analyses yielded no statistically significant results after correction for multiple testing. In the second analyses, however, patients with prior medication at study entry showed higher remission rates in EMC than in TAU (24.2% versus 8.6%, p = 0.017; Bonferroni-Holm corrected significance level: p = 0.025.). Furthermore, patients with a recurrent course of MDD benefited less from treatment as usual (p = 0.009; Bonferroni-Holm corrected significance level: p = 0.025). Age, sex, age of onset, psychiatric or somatic comorbidities, and other subtypes of MDD did not predict remission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in our first analysis we found statistically non-significant results, the second analysis showed significant differences in remission rates between patients with or without previous medication and in patients with recurrent MDD or the first depressive episode. It would therefore be valuable to examine in larger and prospective studies whether remission rates can be increased by quick escalation of treatment in certain subgroups of patients. Promising subgroups to be tested are patients who were previously medicated, and who show a recurrent course of MDD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974155 . Registered at the 10th of September 2009. Retrospectively registered.

Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Thyroid function is closely associated with neuropsychological functions, including mental state and cognitive functions. Although thyroid function is routinely examined in persons with depressive symptom, the association between subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) and depression remains inconclusive. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of depression in persons with SCH. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to August 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of depression, as evaluated by various types of self-reported depression scales. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the risk of depression between persons with SCH and those with euthyroidism. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 103,375 subjects from 7 studies being pooled for the meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of depression. The meta-analysis showed that persons with SCH had a significantly elevated risk of depression than persons with euthyroidism (OR = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.86, P = 0.02). No publication bias was found, as indicated by Egger's test (t = -0.49, P = 0.647) and Begg's test (z = -0.15, P = 0.881). In addition, the funnel plot showed a symmetric distribution. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that SCH was positively associated with the risk of depression, especially in persons above 50 years of age, suggesting it is necessary to pay close attention to depressive symptoms in persons with SCH.

Early improvement of executive test performance during antidepressant treatment predicts treatment outcome in patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Executive dysfunctions frequently occur in patients with Major Depressive Disorder and have been shown to improve during effective antidepressant treatment. However, the time course of improvement and its relationship to treatment outcome is unknown. The aim of the study was to assess the test performance and clinical outcome by repetitive assessments of executive test procedures during antidepressant treatment. Executive test performance was assessed in 209 –patients with Major Depressive Disorder (mean age 39.3 ± 11.4 years) and 84 healthy controls five times in biweekly intervals from baseline to week 8. Patients were treated by a defined treatment algorithm within the early medication change study (EMC trial; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00974155), controls did not receive any intervention. Cognitive domains were processing speed, cognitive flexibility, phonemic and semantic verbal fluency. Intelligence was assessed at baseline. Depression severity was tested once a week by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD₁₇). 130 patients (62%) showed executive dysfunctions in at least one of four tests at baseline. Linear mixed regression models revealed that the course of depression severity was associated to the course of cognitive flexibility (p = 0.004) and semantic verbal fluency (p = 0.020). Cognitive flexibility and semantic verbal fluency may be candidates easily to apply for therapy response prediction in clinical routine, which should be tested in further prospective studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00974155

EudraCT: 2008-008280-96

BDNF Plasma Levels and BDNF Exon IV Promoter Methylation as Predictors for Antidepressant Treatment Response

Major problems of current antidepressant pharmacotherapy are insufficient response rates and difficulties in response prediction. We recently provided preliminary evidence in a small study that patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with a hypomethylation of the CpG-87 site of the promoter IV region of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene are less likely to benefit from antidepressants. Here, we aimed at replicating this finding in a secondary analysis of 561 MDD patients (mean age 40.0 ± 11.9 years, 56% female) included into the Early Medication Change study (EMC). We measured BDNF exon IV promoter and p11 gene methylation at Baseline (BL) as well as BDNF-plasma-levels (pBDNF) at BL and day 14 and related them to treatment outcome. Although we were not able to replicate the predictor function of hypomethylation of the BDNF exon IV promoter, a subgroup of patients with severe depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD-17] ≥ 25) (n = 199) and hypermethylation at CpG-87 of the BDNF exon IV promoter had significantly higher remission rates than patients without a methylation (p = 0.032). We also found that 421 (75%) of 561 patients showed an early improvement (≥ 20% HAMD-17 reduction after 2 weeks), which was associated with a 4.24-fold increased likelihood to remit at study end compared to the 140 patients without early improvement. However, specificity of response prediction of early improvement was low (34%) and false positive rate high (66%). The combination of early improvement with a pBDNF increase between BL and day 14, however, increased the specificity of response prediction from 34 to 76%, and the combination with methylation of the CpG-87 site of the BDNF exon IV promoter from 34 to 62%. Thus, the combined markers reduced false positives rates from 66 to 24% and 38%, respectively. Methylation at other sites or p11 promoter methylation failed to increase specificity of early improvement prediction. In sum, the results add to previous findings that BDNF, BDNF promoter methylation and the combination of clinical and biological markers may be interesting candidates for therapy response prediction which has to be confirmed in further studies. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00974155, identifier: NCT00974155.

Guideline adherence of antidepressant treatment in outpatients with major depressive disorder: a naturalistic study

Little is known about guideline adherence of naturalistic antidepressant drug therapy in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of the study was to analyze guideline adherence, especially regarding treatment length, treatment evaluation and medication change strategies. We investigated 889 patients with MDD who had been admitted for inpatient treatment and were enrolled in the early medication change trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00974155). We investigated all patients at screening visit regarding previous outpatient drug treatment in the index episode, which was assessed by structured interviews. Demographic variables were obtained from patients and patients' records. 51.0% of the patients had received previous drug treatment in the index episode, 56.6% were females, and their mean age was 40.0 years. In the 153 patients who were pharmacologically treated at least 8 weeks, medication was not changed in 129 (84.3%) patients. Patients who had a medication change in their index episode (n = 24, 15.7%) waited 71.1 weeks (±110.4) for their treatment optimization. Only 5 of those 153 patients (3.3%) had a dose increase, whereas 132 patients (86.3%) had no dose adaption at all. Antidepressant blood levels were measured in 46 patients (30.1%). We conclude that a large proportion of patients with MDD is not treated in adherence to treatment guidelines recommending treatment evaluation (e.g. therapeutic drug monitoring) and treatment change after 4 to 8 weeks in non-responders. Earlier treatment optimization may prevent long-term suffering of patients and may avoid inpatient treatment.

Early improvement as a resilience signal predicting later remission to antidepressant treatment in patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Early improvement of depressive symptoms during the first two weeks of antidepressant treatment has been discussed to be a resilience signal predicting a later positive treatment outcome in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, the predictive value of early improvement varies between studies, and the use of different antidepressants may explain heterogeneous results. The objective of this review was to assess the predictive value of early improvement on later response and remission and to identify antidepressants with the highest chance of early improvement. We included 17 randomized controlled trials investigating early improvement in 14,779 adult patients with MDD comparing monotherapy with an antidepressant against placebo or another antidepressant drug. 62% (range: 35-85%) of patients treated with an antidepressant and 47% (range: 21-69%) with placebo were early improver, defined as a >20%/25% symptom reduction after two weeks of treatment. Early improvement predicted response and remission after 5-12 weeks of treatment with high sensitivity (85%; 95%-CI: 84.3 to 85.7) and low to moderate specificity (54%; 95%-CI: 53.1 to 54.9). Early improver had a 8.37 fold (6.97-10.05) higher likelihood to become responder and a 6.38 fold (5.07-8.02) higher likelihood to be remitter at endpoint than non-improver. The highest early improver rates were achieved in patients treated with mirtazapine or a tricyclic antidepressant. This finding of a high predictive value of early improvement on treatment outcome may be important for treatment decisions in the early course of antidepressant treatment. Further studies should test the efficacy of such early treatment decisions.

A combined marker of early non-improvement and the occurrence of melancholic features improve the treatment prediction in patients with Major Depressive Disorders

BACKGROUND

Early Improvement of depressive symptoms within two weeks of antidepressant treatment is a highly sensitive but less specific predictor of later treatment outcome. The aim of this study was to identify clinical features at treatment initiation which are associated with early improvement and non-improvement as well as to identify variables predicting non-remission in patients showing an early improvement.

METHODS

889 patients with a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV who had participated in an antidepressant treatment trial served as study sample. Clinical predictors (demographic variables, psychopathology, comorbid disorders) were analysed in 698 (79%) early improver (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale reduction > 20% after 14 days of treatment) compared to 191 (21%) non-improver. Furthermore, clinical predictors for later remission and non-remission were analysed in the 698 patients showing an early improvement.

RESULTS

Patients with more severe depression and suicidality were more likely to become non-improver, and also non-remitter after 8 weeks of treatment in case of early improvement. Early improver with melancholic, anxious or atypical depression as well as with comorbid social phobia or avoidant personality disorder had an increased risk for non-remission at study end. The combined marker of early non-improvement and the occurrence of melancholic features increased the specificity of treatment prediction from 30% to 90%.

LIMITATIONS

Comorbid disorders were only assessed at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early non-improvement and melancholic features at treatment initiation have a particularly high risk of later non-remission. This group of patients should be considered more attention in treatment decisions.

Randomized controlled study of early medication change for non-improvers to antidepressant therapy in major depression--The EMC trial

Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and no improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy have a high risk of treatment failure. The aim of the study was to determine whether an early medication change (EMC) strategy is superior to a guideline-based treatment in MDD patients without improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Eight-hundred-and-eighty-nine patients with MDD were enrolled, 879 patients received the SSRI escitalopram. Of those, 192 patients had no improvement, defined as a reduction of < 20% on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) after 14 days of treatment, and were randomly assigned to open treatment with the EMC strategy (n = 97; venlafaxine XR for study days 15-56; in case of sustained non-improvement on day 28, lithium augmentation for days 29-56) or TAU (n = 95; escitalopram continuation; non-responders on day 28 were switched to venlafaxine XR for four weeks, i.e. days 29-56). The primary outcome was remission (HAMD-17 ≤ 7) after 8 weeks of treatment as assessed by blinded raters. Remission rates were 24% for EMC and 16% for TAU, which was not significantly different (p = 0.2056). Sensitivity analyses for the primary and secondary effectiveness endpoints consistently showed favorable results for patients randomized to EMC. The results confirm data from post-hoc analyses of clinical trials showing that early non-improvement identifies patients who likely need alternate interventions. However, the herein used two-step switch/augmentation strategy for this risk group was not more effective than the control intervention. Alternate strategies and other design aspects are discussed in order to support researchers addressing the same research question.

Influence of GNB3 C825T polymorphism on the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed the present meta-analysis in order to evaluate the influence of a common polymorphism (C825T, rs5443 C>T) in the GNB3 gene on the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHOD

A relevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CISCOM, CINAHL, Google Scholar, CBM and CNKI databases without any language restrictions. STATA Version 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas USA) was used for this meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Our findings suggested that the GNB3 C825T polymorphism was significantly correlated with a higher response rate to antidepressants in MDD patients under the allele and dominant models. Furthermore, we found significant associations between GNB3 C825T polymorphisms and antidepressant-induced remission in MDD patients. Ethnicity-stratified analysis indicated that GNB3 C825T polymorphisms may be strongly related to the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of MDD among Asians, but not in Caucasians (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide empirical evidence that GNB3 C825T polymorphisms may be correlated with the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of MDD, especially among Asians patients.

The Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C(28)) is more sensitive to changes in depressive symptomatology than the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(17)) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression

Depression rating scales play a decisive role in the assessment of the severity of depression and the evaluation of the efficacy of antidepressant treatments. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) is regarded as the 'gold standard'; nevertheless, studies suggest that the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) is more sensitive to detect symptom changes. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the IDS is more sensitive in detecting changes in depression symptoms in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression (MIND). Biweekly IDS-C(28) and HAMD(17) data from 340 patients of a 10-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of sertraline and cognitive-behavioural therapy in patients with MIND were analysed. We investigated sensitivity to change for both scales (1) from assessment-to-assessment, (2) in relation to depression severity level, and (3) in relation to DSM-IV depression criterion symptoms. The IDS-C(28) was more sensitive in detecting changes in depression symptomatology over the treatment course as well as for different severity levels, especially in patients with a low depression severity. It assesses the DSM-IV criteria more thoroughly, is better able to track the change of cognitive symptoms and to identify residual symptoms. Both scales are well able to assess depressive symptomatology. However, the IDS-C(28) surpasses the HAMD(17) in detecting small changes especially in the core symptoms of depression. This is important for an optimal treatment by capturing early improvements, enabling prompt reactions and detecting residual symptoms.

Early reactions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in plasma (pBDNF) and outcome to acute antidepressant treatment in patients with Major Depression

In Major Depressive Disorder, a growing data base suggests that the onset of antidepressants' action can be detected by improvement of depressive symptoms in the first 10-14 days of treatment. Previous studies showed that the mean concentration of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in blood increases during antidepressant treatment and positively correlates with amelioration of MDD symptoms. We previously showed an association between very early changes of the serum BDNF concentration and treatment outcome (Tadić et al., 2011. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35, 415-420). However, no study has yet investigated whether BDNF concentration in plasma increases in the early course of treatment and enables the prediction of final treatment outcome. The goal of this study was to investigate in MDD patients, whether the change of pBDNF in the early course of treatment is a specific and sensitive marker for final treatment outcome. For this purpose, we performed a naturalistic pilot study with 39 inpatients with MDD according to DSM-IV. Depression severity and pBDNF were measured in weekly intervals from baseline (EP) to endpoint (EP, max. week six) with the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. According to ROC-analysis, the best cut-off value for the prediction of response at EP is an increase of 338 pg/ml or 126%, respectively, of pBDNF between BL and day 7. The single markers pBDNF change and HAMD-21 improvement from BL-d7 predicted later treatment outcome with moderate to high sensitivity and specificity (pBDNF: 42% and 96%, resp.; HAMD improvement: 83% and 65%, resp.). The combined marker early pBDNF change plus HAMD-21 improvement at day 7 increased the specificity for response to 100%. Our data provide first preliminary evidence that an early change of pBDNF in conjunction with early improvement might be a peripheral marker predictive for treatment outcome in patients with MDD. This has to be confirmed in further investigations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

Peripheral blood and neuropsychological markers for the onset of action of antidepressant drugs in patients with Major Depressive Disorder

BACKGROUND

In Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), treatment outcomes with currently available strategies are often disappointing. Therefore, it is sensible to develop new strategies to increase remission rates in acutely depressed patients. Many studies reported that true drug response can be observed within 14 days (early improvement) of antidepressant treatment. The identical time course of symptom amelioration after early improvement in patients treated with antidepressants of all classes or with placebo strongly suggests a common biological mechanism, which is not specific for a particular antidepressant medication. However, the biology underlying early improvement and final treatment response is not understood and there is no established biological marker as yet, which can predict treatment response for the individual patient before initiation or during the course of antidepressant treatment. Peripheral blood markers and executive functions are particularly promising candidates as markers for the onset of action and thus the prediction of final treatment outcome in MDD.

METHODS/DESIGN

The present paper presents the rationales, objectives and methods of a multi-centre study applying close-meshed repetitive measurements of peripheral blood and neuropsychological parameters in patients with MDD and healthy controls during a study period of eight weeks for the identification of biomarkers for the onset of antidepressants' action in patients with MDD. Peripheral blood parameters and depression severity are assessed in weekly intervals from baseline to week 8, executive performance in bi-weekly intervals. Patients are participating in a randomized controlled multi-level clinical trial, healthy controls are matched according to mean age, sex and general intelligence.

DISCUSSION

This investigation will help to identify a biomarker or a set of biomarkers with decision-making quality in the treatment of MDD in order to increase the currently disappointing remission rates of antidepressant treatment.