Transdermal estradiol and testosterone transfer in man: existence, models, and strategies for prevention

Dermatotoxicology of sulfur mustard: Historical perspectives from World War I

Sulfur mustard has been used as a chemical warfare agent for the past century. After its introduction by the Germans in World War I, investigators quickly began studying its impact on the human body including its deleterious effects on skin. This review focuses on two groups in particular who conducted experiments from 1917 to 1918: the United States Army at the American University Experiment Station Laboratories and Torald Sollmann at Western Reserve University. Through this work, these researchers proved far ahead of their time by anticipating dermatologic phenomena not described in the literature until later in the twentieth century. These include regional variation of percutaneous penetration, effect of vehicle on penetration and predicting immunologic contact urticaria. The work conducted by these researchers set the groundwork for much of twentieth century dermatotoxicology.

In Vitro Drug Transfer Due to Drug Retention in Human Epidermis Pretreated with Application of Marketed Estradiol Transdermal Systems

Study objective was to assess skin-to-skin drug transfer potential that may occur due to drug retention in human epidermis (DRE) pretreated with application of estradiol transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) and other estradiol transdermal dosage forms (gels and sprays). TDDS (products-A, B, and C) with varying formulation design and composition, and other estradiol transdermal products (gel and spray) were applied to heat separated human epidermis (HSE) and subjected to in vitro drug permeation study. Amounts of DRE were quantified after 24 h. The DRE with product-B was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than that with product-C, product-A, gel, and spray. However, products-A and C, gel, and spray showed almost the same (P > 0.05) amounts of DRE. A separate in vitro permeation study was carried out to determine amounts of drug transferred from drug-retaining epidermis to untreated HSE. The amounts of drug transferred, due to DRE after 8 h, with product-C were significantly (P < 0.001) higher than those with products-A and B, gel, and spray. The in vitro study results indicate a high potential of skin-to-skin drug transfer due to the DRE after labeled period of using estradiol TDDS, though the clinical relevance of these findings is yet to be determined.

Transdermal patches: history, development and pharmacology

Transdermal patches are now widely used as cosmetic, topical and transdermal delivery systems. These patches represent a key outcome from the growth in skin science, technology and expertise developed through trial and error, clinical observation and evidence-based studies that date back to the first existing human records. This review begins with the earliest topical therapies and traces topical delivery to the present-day transdermal patches, describing along the way the initial trials, devices and drug delivery systems that underpin current transdermal patches and their actives. This is followed by consideration of the evolution in the various patch designs and their limitations as well as requirements for actives to be used for transdermal delivery. The properties of and issues associated with the use of currently marketed products, such as variability, safety and regulatory aspects, are then described. The review concludes by examining future prospects for transdermal patches and drug delivery systems, such as the combination of active delivery systems with patches, minimally invasive microneedle patches and cutaneous solutions, including metered-dose systems.

Pharmacological regulation of the cholesterol transport machinery in steroidogenic cells of the testis

Reduced serum testosterone (T), or hypogonadism, is estimated to affect about 5 million American men, including both aging and young men. Low serum T has been linked to mood changes, worsening cognition, fatigue, depression, decreased lean body mass and bone mineral density, increased visceral fat, metabolic syndrome, decreased libido, and sexual dysfunction. Administering exogenous T, known as T-replacement therapy (TRT), reverses many of the symptoms of low T levels. However, this treatment can result in luteinizing hormone suppression which, in turn, can lead to reduced sperm numbers and infertility, making TRT inappropriate for men who wish to father children. Additionally, TRT may result in supraphysiologic T levels, skin irritation, and T transfer to others upon contact; and there may be increased risk of prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease, particularly in aging men. Therefore, the development of alternate therapies for treating hypogonadism would be highly desirable. To do so requires greater understanding of the series of steps leading to T formation and how they are regulated, and the identification of key steps that are amenable to pharmacological modulation so as to induce T production. We review herein our current understanding of mechanisms underlying the pharmacological induction of T formation in hypogonadal testis.

Pharmacophysiology of bone and spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In recent years, the number of complex spinal surgeries has increased significantly in the elderly population, where the prevalence of low bone density is highest. Consequently, spine surgeons often treat osteoporotic patients who are associated with higher rates of instrumentation failure. Therefore, establishing a successful fusion requires an appropriate substrate for bone formation and local bone remodeling. The fusion process can be supported by therapies that seek to shift the balance of bone homeostasis to increased formation and reduced resorption.

PURPOSE

Thorough understanding of the physiology of bone formation and adjunctive therapies can help improve fusion rates. Therefore, we present a thorough review of the latest pharmacologic agents used to enhance bone strength and surgical spinal fusion.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature.

RESULTS

Current knowledge on bone physiology has led to the development of several pharmacologic agents that enhance bone formation and strengthen the human skeleton. At present, natural supplements of vitamin D and calcium or synthetic medications like bisphosphonates are widely used before and after spine surgeries to enhance bone fusion. Additional physiologic agents, including testosterone, parathyroid hormone, calcitonin, and growth hormone, have been shown to improve bone mass density or spinal fusion in both animal and human studies. As in other medical fields, gene therapy has shown viability and promise with the use of both viral and nonviral vectors.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the understanding of bone physiology, numerous natural and synthetic pharmacologic agents have been developed to enhance the body's skeleton and to improve outcomes of spinal fusion surgery.

Serum testosterone levels in non-dosed females after secondary exposure to 1.62% testosterone gel: effects of clothing barrier on testosterone absorption

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate secondary exposure of testosterone transferred to females from a male partner, dosed with 1.62% testosterone gel after direct skin-to-skin contact with the application site, and to investigate the effect of wearing a t-shirt on testosterone transfer.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Across three studies, a total of 72 healthy males applied 5.0 g 1.62% testosterone gel to their abdomen alone, upper arms/shoulders alone, or a combination of their upper arms/shoulders and abdomen (single dose or once daily for 7 days). Male-female contact occurred 2 or 12 hours after testosterone gel application, with males either wearing or not wearing a t-shirt. There were 15 minutes of supervised contact with the application site between the male and his female partner. Blood samples were collected over a 24 hour period in females for assessment of serum testosterone levels at baseline and after contact.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pharmacokinetic parameters included C(max) (maximum serum concentration), AUC(0-24) (area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours), and C(av) (time-averaged concentration over the 24-hour period post-contact). Subjects were monitored for adverse events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT NUMBERS: Study 1 was not registered (first subject enrolled 8 March 2007); Study 2: 00998933; Study 3, 01130298.

RESULTS

Testosterone levels (C(av) and C(max)) in females increased 86-185% from baseline after direct abdominal skin contact, although C(av) levels remained within female eugonadal range. Testosterone concentrations returned to baseline within 48 hours after last skin contact. A t-shirt barrier reduced testosterone transfer by approximately 40-48% when 5.0 g of testosterone gel was applied to the abdomen alone. A t-shirt barrier prevented transfer when 5.0 g of testosterone gel was applied to the upper arms and shoulders or to a combination of the upper arms and shoulders and the abdomen (C(max) and C(av) increased by approximately 5-11%). No major safety events were observed during the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a risk of testosterone transfer from males using 1.62% testosterone gel to others who come in contact with the application site for at least 12 hours after application. Secondary exposure can be mitigated by means of a t-shirt barrier.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Women for these studies were not selected by menopausal status. The study designs were intended to simulate exaggerated conditions of transfer.

Effect of application site, clothing barrier, and application site washing on testosterone transfer with a 1.62% testosterone gel

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of application site location, clothing barrier, and application site washing on testosterone transfer from males dosed with 1.62% testosterone gel to female partners.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Open-label, randomized, parallel group, crossover study performed in 24 healthy male/female couples. 2.5 or 5.0 g of gel was applied to upper arms and shoulders or abdomens of male subjects. Skin contact occurred 2 hours after gel application between male and female subjects to compare the effect of wearing or not wearing a t-shirt, washing or not washing before contact, and the effect of differing application sites. Treatments were separated by a 1-week washout period. On each dosing day, 15 minutes of supervised skin contact occurred between the dosed male and female partner. Contact was either abdomen to abdomen (male to female), or upper arms/shoulders (male) to upper arms/shoulders, wrists and hands (female), depending on the male application site. Serum samples were collected from females at baseline and after contact to assess secondary testosterone exposure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

C(max) (maximum serum concentration), AUC(0-24) (area under serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours), and C(av) (time-averaged concentration over 24-hour post-contact period) were assessed. Subjects were monitored for adverse events.

RESULTS

Testosterone exposure (C(av) and C(max)) in females increased by up to 27% (2.5 g) or up to 280% (5.0 g) from baseline after direct skin contact at 2 hours after gel application, although C(av) remained within the female eugonadal range. Transfer from the abdomen was prevented when a t-shirt was worn (2.5-g dose). When the application site was washed before contact, mean C(av) was comparable to baseline, and C(max) was slightly higher (14%). Transfer was higher after direct skin-to-skin contact when the application and contact sites were upper arms/shoulders versus the abdomen. Testosterone concentrations returned to baseline within 48 hours after last skin contact.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a risk of testosterone transfer from males using 1.62% testosterone gel to others who come into direct skin contact with the application site. This can be prevented by covering the application site with a t-shirt (2.5-g dose), or washing the application site before contact.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Women for these studies were not selected by menopausal status. The study was conducted under circumstances that were intended to simulate exaggerated conditions of contact and may not represent average contact under normal conditions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT NUMBERS: Study was not registered (first subject enrolled 28 November 2007).