Review of 36,537 patient records for tooth health and longevity of dental restorations

Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index

OBJECTIVE

To investigate occlusal result and post-treatment changes after orthodontic extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion.

SETTING AND SAMPLE

Retrospective longitudinal study in a private practice, with outcome evaluation by an independent academic hospital. Ninety-six patients (53 males, 43 females) consecutively treated by one orthodontist with maxillary first permanent molar extraction were studied, divided into three facial types, based on pre-treatment cephalometric values: hypodivergent (n = 18), normodivergent (n = 21) and hyperdivergent (n = 57).

METHODS

Occlusal outcome was scored on dental casts at T1 (pre-treatment), T2 (post-treatment) and T3 (mean follow-up 2.5 ± 0.9 years) using the weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The paired sample t test and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

PAR was reduced by 95.7% and 89.9% at T2 and T3, respectively, compared with the start of treatment. The largest post-treatment changes were found for overjet and buccal occlusion. Linear regression analysis did not reveal a clear effect (R-Square 0.074) of age, sex, PAR score at T1, incremental PAR score T2-T1, overjet and overbite at T1, and facial type on the changes after treatment (incremental PAR score T3-T2).

CONCLUSIONS

The occlusal outcome achieved after Class II division 1 treatment with maxillary first permanent molar extractions was maintained to a large extent over a mean post-treatment follow-up of 2.5 years. Limited changes after treatment were found, for which no risk factors could be discerned.

Using big data to promote precision oral health in the context of a learning healthcare system

There has been a call for evidence-based oral healthcare guidelines, to improve precision dentistry and oral healthcare delivery. The main challenges to this goal are the current lack of up-to-date evidence, the limited integrative analytical data sets, and the slow translations to routine care delivery. Overcoming these issues requires knowledge discovery pipelines based on big data and health analytics, intelligent integrative informatics approaches, and learning health systems. This article examines how this can be accomplished by utilizing big data. These data can be gathered from four major streams: patients, clinical data, biological data, and normative data sets. All these must then be uniformly combined for analysis and modelling and the meaningful findings can be implemented clinically. By executing data capture cycles and integrating the subsequent findings, practitioners are able to improve public oral health and care delivery.

The differences between three performance measures on dental restorations, clinical success, survival and failure: A matter of perspective

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective methodology study was to investigate the influence of using different definitions for restoration failure and inclusion criteria on restoration longevity expressed in AFR.

METHODS

EPF from fifteen general dental practices were used for collecting the data for this study. From the EPF, 321,749 composite restorations placed in 52,245 patients by forty-seven GDPs between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. Kaplan-Meier statistics were applied and mean AFRs over 2, 5 and 10 years were calculated. The effect on the AFR of using different levels of failure: based on Claims data (CD), Success (SUC), Survival (SUR) and different inclusion criteria of tooth/restoration variables were reported.

RESULTS

Highest AFRs were found for level CD, in which every intervention was considered as failure, and the lowest AFRs for level SUR in which repairs and an endodontic treatments were not considered as a failure. AFRs increased when the observation period prolonged especially for SUR, followed by SUC and CD. An overview of long-term survival studies showed a wide variation in study design, performed clinical examination (USPHS criteria or GDP), number of restorations included, description of restoration failure and found AFRs for CD, SUC and SUR.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using failure criteria, Success and Survival, in future clinical studies would enable a better comparison of studies as well as demonstrate the impact of more conservative restorative intervention protocols on patient care.

Swedish Quality Registry for Caries and Periodontal Diseases - a framework for quality development in dentistry

ObjectivesL There is a need for monitoring dental health and healthcare, as support for quality development, allocation of resources and long-term planning of dental care. The aim of this paper is to describe the concept and implementation of the Swedish Quality Registry for Caries and Periodontal Diseases (SKaPa). Materials and methods: The SKaPa receives information by automatic transfer of data daily from electronic patient dental records via secure connections from affiliated dental care organisations (DCOs). The registry stores information about DCOs, dental professionals and patients. Information on a patient level includes personal identifier, gender, age, living area, dental status, risk assessments for caries and periodontitis, and dental care provided. In addition, data generated from a global question on patient-perceived oral health are uploaded. In total, more than 400 variables are transferred to the registry and updated daily. Results: In 2018, all of the 21 public DCOs and the largest private DCO in Sweden were affiliated to SKaPa, representing a total of 1,089 public and 234 private dental clinics. The accumulated amount of information on dental healthcare covers 6.9 million individuals out of the total Swedish population of 10 million. SKaPa produces reports on de-identified data, both cross-sectional and longitudinal. Conclusion: As a nationwide registry based on automatic retrieval of data directly from patient records, SKaPa offers the basis for a new era of systematic evaluation of oral health and quality of dental care. The registry supports clinical and epidemiological research, data mining and external validation of results from randomised controlled trials

The Monitor Practice Program: implications for dentistry and dental education

The restorative model of care, known colloquially as drilling and filling, has been challenged on the basis of its inappropriateness. The Caries Management System protocol was developed as an evidence-based strategy for non-surgical treatment of caries lesions and the Monitor Practice Program was designed to test the hypothesis that use of the protocol would reduce risk of dental caries experience. After 7 years, patients attending intervention practices, compared with those attending control practices, needed: 30%-50% fewer restorative interventions; 55% fewer first time restorative interventions; 32% fewer repeat restorative interventions; and were only 23% as likely to be classified as high risk. The outcome was cost-effective and patients attending intervention practices highly valued non-invasive care, and intervention dentists derived professional satisfaction from non-surgical caries management. The implications of the program are that the general public will likely embrace the benefits of non-invasive caries management, as will many current and future dental practitioners. This calls for dental practice reform including: the establishment of a clinical discipline in cariology; cariology curriculum development; revised accreditation regulations for cariology programs in dental schools; advanced training in clinical cariology leading to a specialty; support from the dental profession; and public health advocacy.

Tooth loss after periodontal treatment-Mining an insurance database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth loss after periodontal treatment.

METHODS

The data was collected from the digital database of a major German national health insurance company. Periodontal treatment was the intervention in the treatment group. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses on the patient level with the primary outcome extraction were carried out over four years. A control group without treatment was matched and analysed. Differences were tested with the Log-Rank-test. Extraction incidences were calculated over a matched observation period six years before and four years after treatment for both treatment and control group.

RESULTS

A total of 415,718 periodontal treatments could be traced. Focussing on the outcome "extraction", the cumulative four-year survival rate was 63.8% after periodontal treatment. The matched control group without periodontal treatment showed a survival rate of 72.5%. These differences were significant (p < 0.0001). The extraction incidence over time was higher in a four-year period after periodontal treatment compared to a six-year period before periodontal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of periodontal treatment was acceptable. In about two thirds of the patients, extractions could be completely avoided within a four year period after treatment.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study within the German national health insurance system shows that extractions were not observed after periodontal treatment in the majority of cases. Although periodontitis is a chronic disease, patients suffering from periodontitis have a considerable chance to prevent further tooth loss.

Four-year outcomes of restored posterior tooth surfaces-a massive data analysis

OBJECTIVES

There is only sparse knowledge concerning the outcomes of treatments with posterior permanent restorations in general practice settings. This study aimed at evaluating outcomes based on a large dataset by using a novel approach on a tooth surface basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study based on routine data from a major German national health insurance company. Respective treatment fee codes allowed for tracking the clinical courses on a tooth surface level. The study intervention was defined as the placement of a restoration on an interproximal or occlusal posterior tooth surface regardless of its actual extension and material on which no information was available. All surfaces restored between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2013 were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted to estimate four-year survival. The primary outcome was a restorative re-intervention on the same tooth surface. Separate analyses were performed for the secondary outcomes "crowning" and "extraction".

RESULTS

Over ten million interproximal surfaces and eight million occlusal surfaces in nine million posterior teeth had been restored. At 4 years, the cumulative survival rates concerning the primary outcome "re-intervention" for mesial surfaces (81.4%; CI 81.3-81.5%) and distal surfaces (81.2%; CI 81.1-81.2%) differed significantly from those for occlusal surfaces (77.0%; CI 76.9-77.0%). Restored surfaces in premolars showed significantly higher survival rates compared to molars. Four-year survival rates for the secondary outcome "crowning" were 91.9% (CI 91.8-91.9%) for mesial surfaces, 92.1% (CI 92.1-92.2%) for distal surfaces and 93.3% (CI 93.2-93.3%) for occlusal surfaces. The respective rates for the secondary outcome "extraction" were 94.5% (CI 94.5-94.5%) for mesial surfaces, 94.8% (CI 94.7-94.8%) for distal surfaces and 95.4% (CI 95.4-95.5%) for occlusal surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-interventions after restorative treatment play a significant role in general practice settings. Surface-related survival rates of restorations reveal a need for improvement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study allows the estimation of the probability of re-interventions after restoring posterior tooth surfaces. It is based on several million cases from general practises under the terms and conditions of a national health insurance system.

Re-interventions after restoring teeth-Mining an insurance database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine re-interventions after restorative treatment.

METHODS

The data was collected from the digital database of a major German national health insurance company. Only permanent teeth were observed. Placing a permanent restoration other than a crown regardless of involved surfaces and material was the study intervention. The data did not allow for a differentiation between fillings and inlays that were estimated only a very small portion of the restorations. Success was defined as not undergoing any restorative re-intervention with fillings or inlays on the same tooth (primary outcome) and assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses over four years. An additional analysis was conducted rating "crowning" and "extraction" of respective teeth as target events. Differences were tested with the Log-Rank-test. A multivariate Cox regression analyses was carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 17,024,344 restorations placed in 4,825,408 anterior teeth and 9,973,177 posterior teeth could be traced. Focussing on the primary outcome re-intervention, the cumulative four-year success rate was 69.9% for one surface restorations, 74.8% for two surface restorations, 66.6% for three surface restorations and 61.0% for four surface and more extended restorations. These differences were significant (p<0.0001). Focussing on all three target events re-intervention, crowning and extraction, the cumulative four-year success rate was 66.1% for one surface restorations, 67.5% for two surface restorations, 63.0% for three surface restorations and 55.8% for four surface and more extended restorations. The number of restoration surfaces as well as the tooth position remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression.

CONCLUSIONS

The sustainability of restorative dental treatment under the terms and conditions of the German national health insurance system shows room for improvement. From a public health perspective, special focus should be laid on primary and secondary prevention to minimize the restorative treatment need.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study shows that re-interventions are observed regularly after restorative treatment. Therefore, preventive and restorative strategies should be revisited and optimised.

Restoration Survival: Revisiting Patients' Risk Factors Through a Systematic Literature Review

A literature review was conducted to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on restoration survival in posterior permanent teeth as well as to report the methods used to collect these factors. The selection of articles on longitudinal clinical studies investigating the survival of posterior restorations (except full crowns and temporary fillings) and including patient-related factors was performed by applying predefined criteria. The review was organized into two parts, the first describing how patient factors were assessed in the studies (n=45) and the second presenting the statistical significance (n=27) and size of the effect (n=11) of these factors on restoration survival. Patient-related factors mentioned in the studies included age; gender; caries risk; caries activity/severity; decayed, missing, filled teeth; number of restorations; oral hygiene; and bruxism, among others. Sixteen studies included the patient age or age range in the analysis, which was found to be significant in 47% of the studies. Regarding gender, four of 17 reports found a significant effect on survival, showing more failures for men in three studies. The caries risk profile or related variables were included in the analysis of 15 studies, and a significant effect on survival was reported for high-caries-risk individuals (or related variables) in 67% of these studies. Bruxism was also found to influence restoration survival in three of six studies where this variable was investigated. Some issues were found regarding the reporting of methods used to classify patients according to risk and were thoroughly discussed. In view of the information gathered in this review, the assessment of patient factors along with other variables should become part of clinical studies investigating restoration survival, since several of these factors were shown to influence the failure of restorations, regardless of the material type.

Unilateral Maxillary First Molar Extraction in Class II Subdivision: An Unconventional Treatment Alternative

The asymmetrical intra-arch relationship in Class II subdivision malocclusion poses challenges in the treatment planning and mechanotherapy of such cases. This case report demonstrates a treatment technique engaging unilateral extraction of a maxillary first molar and Begg fixed appliances. The outcome stability and the enhancing effect on the eruption of the third molar in the extraction segment were confirmed by a 4-year follow-up examination.

Longitudinal Results of a 10-year Clinical Trial of Repair of Amalgam Restorations

The aim of this prospective, blind, and randomized clinical trial was to assess the effectiveness of repair of localized clinical defects in amalgam restorations that were initially scheduled for replacement. A cohort of 20 patients with 40 (Class I and Class II) amalgam restorations that presented one or more clinical features that deviated from the ideal (Bravo or Charlie) according to US Public Health Service criteria, were randomly assigned to either the repair or the replacement group—A: repair, n = 19; and B: replacement, n = 21. Two examiners who had calibration expertise evaluated the restorations at baseline and 10 years after according to seven parameters: marginal occlusal adaptation, anatomic form, surface roughness, marginal staining, contact, secondary caries, and luster. After 10 years, 30 restorations (75%) were evaluated (Group A: n = 17; Group B: n = 13). Repaired and replaced amalgam restorations showed similar survival outcomes regarding marginal defects and secondary caries in patients with low and medium caries risk, and most of the restorations were considered clinically acceptable after 10 years. Repair treatment increased the potential for tooth longevity, using a minimally interventional procedure. All restorations trend to downgrade over time.

A survey of practices of tunnel preparation among dentists who attended the 100th FDI Annual World Dental Congress

AIM

To study the practice of tunnel restoration (TR) among dentists who attended the 100th World Dental Federation (FDI) Annual World Dental Congress (AWDC).

METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was administered to a sample of 150 dentists who attended the 100th FDI AWDC in 2012. The participants were asked about TR and their practice of TR. They were also asked to provide their years of dental practice and the countries in which they received their dental training.

RESULTS

Fifteen respondents were not performing restoration, and they were excluded from analysis. Most respondents (123/135) practiced general dentistry. Their basic dental training was from 46 countries and regions. Most of them (n = 117, 87%) knew about TR, and 53% (n = 71) practiced it. There were 12 dentists (9%) who had performed more than 10 TRs in the previous 12 months. Practice of TR among dentists who graduated more than 10 years previously was more common (odds ratio 5.87-5.98) than those who graduated <3 years previously.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found that about half of the surveyed dentists practiced TR, although most of them knew about it. Tunnel restoration was performed more frequently among dentists who had more than 10 years of clinical experience.